I think the bagel-rules, i.e. that you cannot make it too difficult for someone to reach a certain spot is difficult to defend on strict philosophical libertarian grounds.
All the socialists who think that businesses extort 'unfair' prices from consumers should try running businesses! I mean from the cost of maintaining production and the lower revenues that tend to arise from very high prices that create high net profit margins, many businesses have a difficult time even remaining solvent. With that in mind we can see why price ceilings are so destructive. Prices have to rise with diminishing returns on production, price ceilings make production insolvent quicker
I don't agree with his bagel theory. If someone block the option of a road, for instance, I say we expose the land owner, and boycott his products/business, take away privilege to the private road, so on and so on... I'm sure he will reconsider someway.
Walmart would be a lot more careful in their research on potential new locations if there is an additional cost, rather than if it is eliminated. The process is still not perfect and stores in general would still close if they are not profitable (consumers do not demand it to a profitable extent), as they should close. Murray N. Rothbard nailed it with "All rights are property rights", once you violate one, you potentially violate all of them.
Would it be okay for Walmart to expropriate that property instead of offering the owner a price he might be interested in? With that logic, I can also steal the shirt off of you and give it to someone who needs it. Lets say you do advocate this sort of theft, it is still not logical from an economic perspective because people make mistakes.
Are you defending this practice? If not, what is your point? I dont think he was arguing that they dont exist. He was just saying they are bad practices. Also...Excelsior!
Organjic, I suggest you watch it again, if anything Walter is agreeing with you. In any case, are you saying its okay to steal someone's property because of some "greater good"? Lets say Walmart (which provides a vast variety of products for a fairly low price) wants to build a store in some ideal location which needs employment / has only a poor variety of expensive goods available etc.
I think the bagel-rules, i.e. that you cannot make it too difficult for someone to reach a certain spot is difficult to defend on strict philosophical libertarian grounds.
BiznizTrademark 1 year ago
@BiznizTrademark You can buy a helicopter for 100 or 150k right now, in the future this road issue will be a joke.
Hashishin13 1 year ago
All the socialists who think that businesses extort 'unfair' prices from consumers should try running businesses! I mean from the cost of maintaining production and the lower revenues that tend to arise from very high prices that create high net profit margins, many businesses have a difficult time even remaining solvent. With that in mind we can see why price ceilings are so destructive. Prices have to rise with diminishing returns on production, price ceilings make production insolvent quicker
Nintendomanwill 1 year ago
"unemployed socks"...lol
constablekohler 2 years ago 4
Another good video. Like all (or at least most) of the Mises Institutes videos, these concepts are easy to grasp. Good job guys
constablekohler 2 years ago
In addition to a fixed amount of money, controlled rent can be augmented by other "services" by a young and pretty girl tenant.
sinitskyd 2 years ago 4
sinitskyd, he says that at about 15:40 or so
jnort122 2 years ago
The arson stuff at 10:00 is crazy
latewire 2 years ago 3
I don't agree with his bagel theory. If someone block the option of a road, for instance, I say we expose the land owner, and boycott his products/business, take away privilege to the private road, so on and so on... I'm sure he will reconsider someway.
Organjic 2 years ago
Walmart would be a lot more careful in their research on potential new locations if there is an additional cost, rather than if it is eliminated. The process is still not perfect and stores in general would still close if they are not profitable (consumers do not demand it to a profitable extent), as they should close. Murray N. Rothbard nailed it with "All rights are property rights", once you violate one, you potentially violate all of them.
patrikkorda 2 years ago 2
Would it be okay for Walmart to expropriate that property instead of offering the owner a price he might be interested in? With that logic, I can also steal the shirt off of you and give it to someone who needs it. Lets say you do advocate this sort of theft, it is still not logical from an economic perspective because people make mistakes.
patrikkorda 2 years ago 5
The gov't already steals the shirt off your back and gives it to someone else, it's called welfare.
ManBearPigWolf 2 years ago 6
Are you defending this practice? If not, what is your point? I dont think he was arguing that they dont exist. He was just saying they are bad practices. Also...Excelsior!
NicoBanTyralash 2 years ago
Organjic, I suggest you watch it again, if anything Walter is agreeing with you. In any case, are you saying its okay to steal someone's property because of some "greater good"? Lets say Walmart (which provides a vast variety of products for a fairly low price) wants to build a store in some ideal location which needs employment / has only a poor variety of expensive goods available etc.
patrikkorda 2 years ago 2
Sorry my comments came out in reverse order, read from the third to the first :{
patrikkorda 2 years ago