@ObjectiveImpact I don't think that's a logical thing to do. I think the logical thing would be to open to ideas of extra dimensions until its proven that they don't exist.
Also (unrelated), I think the strength of gravity relating to it spending a lot of time in other dimensions is an interesting one, and if you don't believe in higher dimensions like a 4th, 5th, 6th etc., consider that maybe light only travels in three (so we could never see them) or that they're too small to be seen.
@DrZudsi well, think of it like 0D=point... it takes a lot of points to build a line=1D, then a lot of alinged lines to create an area=2D, and a lot of stocked areas to create volume=3D... i think when people say 4D is time, they mean that it takes a lot of volumes (one at a time) to create time streams and so on:)
@MyFiveSeconds the fourth dimension as time comes from the considerations of relativity. General relativity is formulated with something called a Minkowski space, which has 4 dimensions, not 3. However, the 4th dimension works differently than the other three (it isn't symmetrical with respect to that dimension) which explains why space seems to be fundamentally separate from time, even though spacetime is actually only one thing.
@TheVerandaguy that is what I'd like to think too, because it merely makes sense, but take your thought further and you get: 1D=point, 2D=line, 3D=..... at this point 3D would equal an area(x and y), which would mean that a cube is 4 dimesional (x, y and z) which it is not, simply per definition. Dimensions are defined like 0D=point(=1 or x^0), 1D=line(=x or x^1), 2D=surface(=x^2), 3D=volume(=x^3)
With your fractal space-filling curve you still need two coordinates to specify any location on it (except where you define zero to be). Trying to travel, say, 2 units from a given location becomes a meaninglessly complex task because the curve has an infinite amount of detail. In other words, every set of two locations have an infinite amount of distance between them, no matter how "close" you try to choose them.
Going from 1D to 2D is actually quite simple when you deal with integers. It goes 1,1 - 1,2 - 2,1 - 1,3 - 2,2 - 3,1 etc. From there it's quite simple to go to higher dimensions.
We define the number of dimensions we live in by what we experience. If we only experience life in 3D, then so be it. However, to argue that more dimensions exist, one must prove as such. To prove it, one must show that interaction with additional dimensions is possible. If the interactions are insignificant enough that they have absolutely zero effect on reality, then guess what? No real interaction. That's my opinion, anyways...
@AlphaVinigre You are correct. I believe that other dimensions could and most probably do exist, but until hard rock solid facts are pressented, I will do most logical thing- not to believe in existence of other dimensions.
You can look at gas, but you can also look at black holes. And black holes indicate that the maximum entropy contained in a region of space is related to the surface area of the black hole - not it's volume.
Some quantity of our reality seems to be two dimensional at least.
@xSpectrumGaming The concept is a theoretical construct in which space is filled by a line with infinite curves. It is hard to grasp because you grew up with space as being 3D hence your comment saying 3D space, but in this theory space could also be filled by a line with an infinite number of turns. In this way you could determine your position in space by measuring your distance along the line, therefore space can be defined in one dimension.
@mazell1988 We use 3D to define space however because it is much simpler to have three measurements to make since everyone can perceive three dimensions and therefore measurements remain consistent. If you where to measure things based on a line and two people drew their lines differently the object would be defined as occupying two different positions by two different people even though it never moved. If we could perceive time as a dimension it would be a 4D coordinate system etc.
@xSpectrumGaming imagine taking a giant piece of paper and curling it into a ball, then take that a step further, and imagine that the paper has infinite folds, so you can't tell if it's folded up, or if it is solid. that's what he is saying about space.
Do one on the possibility of the fourth dimension , Many people believe we are in a 3 dimensional world and we cannot understand the fifth dimension because we do not live in it or a higher one than it!
Disagree, all these scientific facts about the relation between volume and radius in diffusion is concluded as we observe it in this 3-d world. Your assumption and conclusion are circular. There is simply no way to determine it.
so, if something is 4D or 5D, we can't see it? or do we see it in 3D? ... but if we see it in 3D then, what happens to the other 1 or 2 dimensions? do they just disappear?
@MrQStew I like this observation. But if there are infinite points between 1 & 1.1 and between 1 & 10 - how comes, when applying the same thought to time, 9 seconds feels longer than 0.9 seconds.
@richyantwi i am not a physicist/mathematician, but i think you're conflating between the cardinality of infinity and actual discrete units of time.
with infinity, you can do all sorts of crazy maths to prove anything (there's another minute physics where he makes infinite = -1). so it's best not to conflate the two. someone else probably has a better answer.
Yes, essentially I am comparing the Cardinality of Infinity and the Cardinality of Time. A second is, as you say, a discrete unit of time - this is just as discrete as whole numbers. But you you can get Granular with both of them... It's weird but compelling to think about.
But I think you're right in your implication, that I am missing something. That's why I watch minutephysics hehe. I saw that vid on "infinity = -1". Another interesting topic.
@minutephysics Please make a video explaining the fourth dimension. I had a question, as well: isn't the fourth dimension essentially a graph of the 3-D object versus time, showing the past and the future as parts of this graphs? If so, could the scale not be narrowed down to a single atom, tracing its path through the Universe? PLEASE make a video on this!!
in 3D coordinates an object's positioning is determined by its longitude, latitude and altitude. But 3D does not show WHEN the object is at that position, thats where the 4th dimension comes in, time. An object in 4D's positioning is still determined by latitude, longitude and altitude but the point is time when the object is in that place is also given. I hope that helps =]
@Neutrino980 Thats only one theory about 4D, which is not a staple at all. Cosmologists imagine 4D as an added dimension, which is not related to time. They use their 4D theory to try to describe things like the shape of our universe, the expansion of it, or even the Big Bang, among other things.
@Neutrino980 Eistein concluded that the fourth dimension was time, but he's been wrong before. He also thought that you could go in a straight line through the universe, and eventually return to where you were before: This would not be possible unless there was a physical fourth dimension of additional space that we cannot witness, or are so accustomed to that we don't notice. I have a theory about this, but I don't really want to explain it where everyone can see.
@rockrick1988 4th dimension, scientists believe that we live in a 4 dimensional sphere. that 4th dimension is said to be time. so its ( x, y, z, t)... so if we ever build a time machine, time would be a vital coordinate
This is similar to an observation I made. If you get down to small decimals, you realise that there are equally as many numbers between 1 and 10 as there are between 1 and 1.1. If you just keep adding decimal places and going on, the number of numbers between approaches infinity, just like the number of points on the curve being equal to the number of points in a given space.
Well first, I'm not a physisisisisisist (damn grammaer :) so please judge me on the 'easy-level'. However, my question to you guys: Is it possible to assume, we actually ARE on a curled line defined by us as "time" on which we see "space" wich is actually the same line in a different point of view somehow linked to the same time (maybe touching/crossing the "time"-curve? Might it be that the relation time/space is coorelating such as that given us the Illusion of living in a 3D world?
Didn't get a word you said. Sounds like you're educating scientists that already know the terms and physics. Explain it in words where normal people can understand. And don't say that I'm retarded for asking. I'm not a fucking science major. An average person should understand this. Unless your channel is all about refreshing scientists memories.
@PsYc01025 I'm not a scientist and I understood this pretty well.
Pretty much everything he says in here is really understandable (assuming you paid enough attention in Middle School level shit) Diffusion (molecules spreading out), the three dimensions, curves, etc.
If you're having trouble understanding this video, break what he says and think about it. He's not here to break everything down for you, he only has a minute time frame to present a new way of thinking about shit.
What if we think of dimensions as the basic properties for matter to exist? With the 3 dimensions if space and one of time matter can never exist. We can say the same for energy. So can energy be considered another dimension?
Most, if not all matter can be described in fractional dimensions. The notion of whole number, orthogonal dimensions doesn't match what we can now see.
@MinutePhysics "every point in space can be labeled just one coordinate"
Could you explain that more precisely, please? It doesn't make any sense to me and I am studying mathematics - and I highly doubt this statement is true!
I do really like your videos, but sometimes I feel like you don't always know very much about the stuff you're talking about, just as in this case.
@mag2XYZ Fill a box with string (assume there's no space for air left over). Any point in that box can be represented by how far along that string it is. Instead of challenging the knowledge of the video maker, you COULD just google it/use common sense.
@Uebermenschman No that's the entire point. As long as the measuring perspective is 'a' dimensions, you can reference 'a' dimensions with one co-ordinate =). The issue here is people thinking you can use the number of co-ordinates we use to determine the number of planes.
@SuperCrazyIdiot im not sure the maker of this video really understand what he is talking about. a quote supposedly from einstein (but regardless who said it, i completely agree with it), says "if you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it well enough"
This is a silly theory. We use x,y,z system because it's the easiest way to map any coordinate. There's no right answer. It's not something that already exists, the system is created by people, and the most efficient system should be used. It's just a silly idea.
@DustinTROM Well that's kind of his point - he's explaining why x,y,z is the best system. He points out that there are alternatives, then says that if you want to describe how gasses diffuse, you better be using three dimensions! It's not so much a theory about what's out there, as an exercise in asking ourselves why we think about things in the way that we do.
@DoctorFastest Incidentally, some physicists nowadays are experimenting with working in n-1 dimensions instead of n dimensions (where usually n=11) to see if that makes the maths easier. So far, the maths are too hard either way. ;)
@DarkGraff1 Do you have a question? Someone might try to give an answer.
This is one of the more confusing ones though. It's hard to see what exactly the difference would be between three normal dimensions, and one really weird one that goes through every point. Is this just two different ways of describing the same thing?
@DoctorFastest One way to see a difference between the two things is to ask what predictions they make about how things should behave. Gasses spread out in the three normal direction, not along the weird direction that goes through every point. This, and similar results from other experiments, seem to tell us that three dimensions is the better way to describe things.
This has been flagged as spam show
@ObjectiveImpact I don't think that's a logical thing to do. I think the logical thing would be to open to ideas of extra dimensions until its proven that they don't exist.
Also (unrelated), I think the strength of gravity relating to it spending a lot of time in other dimensions is an interesting one, and if you don't believe in higher dimensions like a 4th, 5th, 6th etc., consider that maybe light only travels in three (so we could never see them) or that they're too small to be seen.
MrJepcats 4 days ago
@DrZudsi well, think of it like 0D=point... it takes a lot of points to build a line=1D, then a lot of alinged lines to create an area=2D, and a lot of stocked areas to create volume=3D... i think when people say 4D is time, they mean that it takes a lot of volumes (one at a time) to create time streams and so on:)
MyFiveSeconds 4 days ago
@MyFiveSeconds the fourth dimension as time comes from the considerations of relativity. General relativity is formulated with something called a Minkowski space, which has 4 dimensions, not 3. However, the 4th dimension works differently than the other three (it isn't symmetrical with respect to that dimension) which explains why space seems to be fundamentally separate from time, even though spacetime is actually only one thing.
IIRobertll 2 days ago
Um, a "one-dimensional line" is a paradox. By definition, one dimension can only contain (and by extension be) a single point.
TheVerandaguy 5 days ago
@TheVerandaguy that is what I'd like to think too, because it merely makes sense, but take your thought further and you get: 1D=point, 2D=line, 3D=..... at this point 3D would equal an area(x and y), which would mean that a cube is 4 dimesional (x, y and z) which it is not, simply per definition. Dimensions are defined like 0D=point(=1 or x^0), 1D=line(=x or x^1), 2D=surface(=x^2), 3D=volume(=x^3)
MyFiveSeconds 4 days ago
With your fractal space-filling curve you still need two coordinates to specify any location on it (except where you define zero to be). Trying to travel, say, 2 units from a given location becomes a meaninglessly complex task because the curve has an infinite amount of detail. In other words, every set of two locations have an infinite amount of distance between them, no matter how "close" you try to choose them.
MrTanookiMario 6 days ago
so what does a 4D perspective look like?
gamer5122 6 days ago
Going from 1D to 2D is actually quite simple when you deal with integers. It goes 1,1 - 1,2 - 2,1 - 1,3 - 2,2 - 3,1 etc. From there it's quite simple to go to higher dimensions.
tFighterPilot 1 week ago
We define the number of dimensions we live in by what we experience. If we only experience life in 3D, then so be it. However, to argue that more dimensions exist, one must prove as such. To prove it, one must show that interaction with additional dimensions is possible. If the interactions are insignificant enough that they have absolutely zero effect on reality, then guess what? No real interaction. That's my opinion, anyways...
AlphaVinigre 1 week ago
@AlphaVinigre You are correct. I believe that other dimensions could and most probably do exist, but until hard rock solid facts are pressented, I will do most logical thing- not to believe in existence of other dimensions.
ObjectiveImpact 1 week ago
70 people thought the video was in 3D
15butcherj 1 week ago
You can look at gas, but you can also look at black holes. And black holes indicate that the maximum entropy contained in a region of space is related to the surface area of the black hole - not it's volume.
Some quantity of our reality seems to be two dimensional at least.
MadCat360 1 week ago
Are pixels one dimensional?
tbrew222 1 week ago
I'm confused on how 1 dimensional curves can make up 3d space.
xSpectrumGaming 1 week ago
@xSpectrumGaming The concept is a theoretical construct in which space is filled by a line with infinite curves. It is hard to grasp because you grew up with space as being 3D hence your comment saying 3D space, but in this theory space could also be filled by a line with an infinite number of turns. In this way you could determine your position in space by measuring your distance along the line, therefore space can be defined in one dimension.
mazell1988 1 week ago
@mazell1988 We use 3D to define space however because it is much simpler to have three measurements to make since everyone can perceive three dimensions and therefore measurements remain consistent. If you where to measure things based on a line and two people drew their lines differently the object would be defined as occupying two different positions by two different people even though it never moved. If we could perceive time as a dimension it would be a 4D coordinate system etc.
mazell1988 1 week ago
@xSpectrumGaming imagine taking a giant piece of paper and curling it into a ball, then take that a step further, and imagine that the paper has infinite folds, so you can't tell if it's folded up, or if it is solid. that's what he is saying about space.
Ignore14 1 week ago
@DarioColon
how the ell did he do that???? O_O
dereky8 1 week ago
i got 3d glasses! -D---D-
AsianBo0y 1 week ago
My house > London > The Moon > My Garage.
Just where is your garage?!
TheMonkeyWithTheHat 1 week ago 50
@TheMonkeyWithTheHat andromeda, where is your's?
movon2survive 3 days ago in playlist MinutePhysics
Vihart, are you taking hormones?
TheZequitube 1 week ago
Do one on the possibility of the fourth dimension , Many people believe we are in a 3 dimensional world and we cannot understand the fifth dimension because we do not live in it or a higher one than it!
razial36 2 weeks ago
I thought it was 11 dimensions///
00Billy 2 weeks ago
@00Billy Theoretically there are 11 dimensions, but we only live in / experience 3 (4 if time counts)
thetechanatoralt 1 week ago
@thetechanatoralt
Sometimes I can't even find my ass...with both hands... i think it goes to the 9th for short periods/
00Billy 1 week ago
@00Billy There are 12 [dimensions]
KageTori12 1 week ago
@KageTori12
now if I mentioned the number 22... would their be a high eisenberg factor of my stupidity? lol
00Billy 1 week ago
@KageTori12
meant to add... wouldn't it be better with 11 or 13? nice juicy prime number ?
00Billy 1 week ago
3-d works in real life. So that is why we use it.
Wenyang0407 2 weeks ago in playlist MinutePhysics
Disagree, all these scientific facts about the relation between volume and radius in diffusion is concluded as we observe it in this 3-d world. Your assumption and conclusion are circular. There is simply no way to determine it.
Wenyang0407 2 weeks ago in playlist MinutePhysics
This has been flagged as spam show
O͍̪̣͈̭ͨ̉̐́̓ͮĥ͔̫̯̖̦̟̙ͨ̌̊͗͑̚ ̰̲̦͓̥c̦͇̣̣̠r͖͓̳͖͔ͧ̃̃ȧ͓̼ͬp̥.̣͈͍͕̯̮.͕̂.̤̯̲͔͑͋̓̅ͯ̾I͉͉̳̳ ̺̒th̟͕͙̅ͧiͩ̐ͪͦn̖͈ͩk͍̘̀͊ ̮̰̀̾͊̒͑ͪͣĬ̦̻̟͈̜̦ͩ͗ͦ ̹͎̭̠͙ͫ̏m̮̔ȯ̠̜̾̎v̲͔̹̯̲̺̤ë͆͐ͮ̓̂d̖̩̪̑̅ͮ͑ͪͣ ͔̬̗̟̟̲̳̽̍i̹̠ͨ̔ͨn͚̈̑͆ͭ̌ͅt͉ͨ̐̐͗o̤͕͂̊͋ ̤t̲͉̬͐͛h͙̬̳͚̪͑ͣ͋̈ẹ̙̞ͫͥ̃͋̎ ̺͙͖̗̩f̖̘̭̫̠̼͇i̮̦͍̰͇͋̆̂f̖̭̙͇̬̞̻t͚̤̩̟̟͌̀h̳̺ͯ̃̆ ͇̘̮̞ͧ̋͐ͤͥ̋d̳̱́̇̑͑ͯi͙̻̮͇͙m̜͉ͭ͋̈́e̬͉̾ͮnͥͩ͊̆s̰̳̰̥͈ͪ͐͌̿ͤiͨͯ͐̄̎o̩͖̮͔̼̳̹ͯ̊ͯn͇͎̭͓̼̩̒ͬ͂ͅ.̙̭̅ͨ͒͒ͭ̓ͭ.̲͋͌͑̔͗̊̿.̘̊ͦ̄ͧͧͅ
hasantariq123 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็
SomeAssholeOnYT 2 weeks ago
WTF. CRAZY COMMENTS EXPLODING EVERYWHERE.
chocobosROK 2 weeks ago 2
we are 3d. full stop. end of story.
nerdybrony 3 weeks ago in playlist MinutePhysics 2
@nerdybrony isn't time the 4th dimension?
newlyrisen 2 weeks ago
@newlyrisen true point. we are 4d. end of revised story.
nerdybrony 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
aqualieutenant 2 weeks ago
Gabe newall is the fourth dimension.
thecheatlord999 3 weeks ago
This is wrong.
theblueisyou 3 weeks ago
To fast and brief. How do you expect people to understand?
theapocilip 3 weeks ago
this guy vs vihart
TheRausing1 3 weeks ago in playlist MinutePhysics
WAIT A SECOND if the line would be cureld up it wouldnt be at least 2D because 1D is just a straight line ?
kleinesmaenchen 3 weeks ago
@kleinesmaenchen true that...
bennydu2007 3 weeks ago
what a stupid thing to consider....curved line...pf
dingobeater 3 weeks ago
what is 4D?
PrinceCharrrming 3 weeks ago
@PrinceCharrrming time
SenorBroncasaur 3 weeks ago
@PrinceCharrrming
3D + smell. I think it's when I put on 3D glasses and ride a ride at a theme park. I could see 3D images coming at me and smell them too. lol
chocoboblue99 2 weeks ago
We live in 4d. But we can only see in 3d. Look at your palm. If you were able to see in 4d, you would be able to see the back and front of your palm
TheUnicornslayer 3 weeks ago
@TheUnicornslayer I don't think you understand dimensions.
Lukeyy19 3 weeks ago
I wish you'd do more than one minute. These are fascinating. I've long been annoyed at my lack of grounding in physics.
YourXavier 1 month ago 69
This has been flagged as spam show
so, if something is 4D or 5D, we can't see it? or do we see it in 3D? ... but if we see it in 3D then, what happens to the other 1 or 2 dimensions? do they just disappear?
DiskyToy 1 month ago
Comment removed
DiskyToy 1 month ago
But you didn't explain what a dimension is, only why we live in 3D.
trouts4 1 month ago
You forgot 4D.
Mrjarrett1 1 month ago
Copy and paste that weird comment and then hold delete and watch as the letters go away. It's weird :3
PeachesAndSkeet 1 month ago
press 5 for ass
CKDindustry 1 month ago 2
I don't understand ANYTHING this guy sais, but at the same time I know exactly what's going on.
Whoaman555 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็
PinkRoboticDinosaurs 1 month ago
flatland FTW!
seductiveox 1 month ago 2
@MrQStew I like this observation. But if there are infinite points between 1 & 1.1 and between 1 & 10 - how comes, when applying the same thought to time, 9 seconds feels longer than 0.9 seconds.
richyantwi 1 month ago
@richyantwi i am not a physicist/mathematician, but i think you're conflating between the cardinality of infinity and actual discrete units of time.
with infinity, you can do all sorts of crazy maths to prove anything (there's another minute physics where he makes infinite = -1). so it's best not to conflate the two. someone else probably has a better answer.
simulcra 1 month ago in playlist More videos from minutephysics
@simulcra Thank you for your quick reply.
Yes, essentially I am comparing the Cardinality of Infinity and the Cardinality of Time. A second is, as you say, a discrete unit of time - this is just as discrete as whole numbers. But you you can get Granular with both of them... It's weird but compelling to think about.
But I think you're right in your implication, that I am missing something. That's why I watch minutephysics hehe. I saw that vid on "infinity = -1". Another interesting topic.
richyantwi 1 month ago
I'm just here for the prettz pictures... hahahahahah :D
TheRule23 1 month ago
They show a diagram of THE FOURTH DIMENSION! At 0:58!
JamesIcepick 1 month ago in playlist MinutePhysics
This has been flagged as spam show
brain.exe has stopped working.
mcr6478 1 month ago
@minutephysics Please make a video explaining the fourth dimension. I had a question, as well: isn't the fourth dimension essentially a graph of the 3-D object versus time, showing the past and the future as parts of this graphs? If so, could the scale not be narrowed down to a single atom, tracing its path through the Universe? PLEASE make a video on this!!
newbiedoodle 1 month ago
Try to explain what 4D is! That would be very interesting!
DrZudsi 1 month ago
@DrZudsi 4D explaination:
in 3D coordinates an object's positioning is determined by its longitude, latitude and altitude. But 3D does not show WHEN the object is at that position, thats where the 4th dimension comes in, time. An object in 4D's positioning is still determined by latitude, longitude and altitude but the point is time when the object is in that place is also given. I hope that helps =]
Neutrino980 1 month ago in playlist MinutePhysics
This has been flagged as spam show
@Neutrino980 Thats only one theory about 4D, which is not a staple at all. Cosmologists imagine 4D as an added dimension, which is not related to time. They use their 4D theory to try to describe things like the shape of our universe, the expansion of it, or even the Big Bang, among other things.
SilentShotV 1 month ago
@Neutrino980 Eistein concluded that the fourth dimension was time, but he's been wrong before. He also thought that you could go in a straight line through the universe, and eventually return to where you were before: This would not be possible unless there was a physical fourth dimension of additional space that we cannot witness, or are so accustomed to that we don't notice. I have a theory about this, but I don't really want to explain it where everyone can see.
EXOUSTIA 1 month ago
@Neutrino980 @DrZudsi How would you describe 5D? Or is there a 5D?
PrinceCharrrming 3 weeks ago
I never know what this guy is talking about....:(
dngu00 1 month ago
I Love watching minutephysics! They make me so happy and calm ;D
Bjarnejoensen 1 month ago
just fyi, as i keep seeing it in the comments, 4D in physics is typically x+y+z+time :)
gibbo1112 1 month ago
this is bs
jumb0mumb0 1 month ago
O͍̪̣͈̭ͨ̉̐́̓ͮĥ͔̫̯̖̦̟̙ͨ̌̊͗͑̚ ̰̲̦͓̥c̦͇̣̣̠r͖͓̳͖͔ͧ̃̃ȧ͓̼ͬp̥.̣͈͍͕̯̮.͕̂.̤̯̲͔͑͋̓̅ͯ̾I͉͉̳̳ ̺̒th̟͕͙̅ͧiͩ̐ͪͦn̖͈ͩk͍̘̀͊ ̮̰̀̾͊̒͑ͪͣĬ̦̻̟͈̜̦ͩ͗ͦ ̹͎̭̠͙ͫ̏m̮̔ȯ̠̜̾̎v̲͔̹̯̲̺̤ë͆͐ͮ̓̂d̖̩̪̑̅ͮ͑ͪͣ ͔̬̗̟̟̲̳̽̍i̹̠ͨ̔ͨn͚̈̑͆ͭ̌ͅt͉ͨ̐̐͗o̤͕͂̊͋ ̤t̲͉̬͐͛h͙̬̳͚̪͑ͣ͋̈ẹ̙̞ͫͥ̃͋̎ ̺͙͖̗̩f̖̘̭̫̠̼͇i̮̦͍̰͇͋̆̂f̖̭̙͇̬̞̻t͚̤̩̟̟͌̀h̳̺ͯ̃̆ ͇̘̮̞ͧ̋͐ͤͥ̋d̳̱́̇̑͑ͯi͙̻̮͇͙m̜͉ͭ͋̈́e̬͉̾ͮnͥͩ͊̆s̰̳̰̥͈ͪ͐͌̿ͤiͨͯ͐̄̎o̩͖̮͔̼̳̹ͯ̊ͯn͇͎̭͓̼̩̒ͬ͂ͅ.̙̭̅ͨ͒͒ͭ̓ͭ.̲͋͌͑̔͗̊̿.̘̊ͦ̄ͧͧͅ
DarioColon 1 month ago in playlist More videos from minutephysics 278
@DarioColon nope. zalgo
elektronikc 1 month ago
@elektronikc Nope, C͉͔̩̻͍͇͍͍͛̃ͩ̑̚̕ḩ̷̣̽ͤͩ̑͂̓ͣ̎u̡̫̟̪̩̺͇͔͈̓̀̏ͧč̷̨̭̻͖̅̓͜k̨̲̦̗̉͌͑ͣ̚͜ ̘͖̏̔̎̈͜T̘͎͙͇̲͉͇̖̒͊̀͒ͅe͙̺̬̼̺̝͆ͥ̇̈̎͌̀͜ͅs̴̭ͣ͗ͪͨ͑ͯ͛̂̏t͉̯̩͍ͪͦ̕ͅa̲̞͎̲̦͖͚ͨ̏ͭͩͣͬ̀́.
MattVariety 1 month ago 2
@DarioColon zalgo is for noobs ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็
ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็
chaosx7777 3 weeks ago
@̣̣͎͎̥͔̟̿Ḍ̺ͩ̋̆͝ạ̜̘̣͓̜ͥ̐̈̆̚r̃̾ͩ͊̆i̗̞̪͈̘̽̄͂͂̓͒̀o̤͔̭ͤ́Ć̲̖̳̱̐̽͆̉ͩo̩͓̼̘͘l̞̤͔̠̣̺̊͛́̚͜ͅo̧̘̔̽́̏̎̓ǹ̟̩̚ ̠̙͚̾̊ͣ͠Ṁ̴̲͉̜͕̠̤͚͆ͤ͆e̼ͥ̆͡ ͉̭͔̳̠̭t͂̓̓̐̚҉̞̩̞ȍ̸̋ͯ̋͆ŏ̭͈!̺̪͇̾̔!̸͍̖̗̦̘̦ͥͯ!̢͇̬̘̈ͨ̑ ͩͫ͡:̭͓̱͔̱̣̽̔͆͊Ǒ̻̥̗͖̰ͅ
1lAllanl1 3 weeks ago
@DarioColon How did you make that. I Googled it and Google said they could process it.
ModelThree64 3 weeks ago
@ModelThree64 Use the text generator at eeemo.net
DarioColon 3 weeks ago
since 2D isn't directly observable (we keep thinking everything is 3D) does that mean the comparison is between theoretical 1D and observable 3D ?
piecharthosen 1 month ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@piecharthosen oddiest thing is if you observe 2d on a 3d plain it would be both 1d and 2d. in theory there is a break between the two.
43darkNero 1 month ago
You should do a video what 4D really is! thumbs up if you agree :)
Nboy1000 1 month ago 3
What about 4D?
BEAVER7014 1 month ago
@BEAVER7014 that's the "and so on" part.
emikochan13 1 month ago
ow my brain
leroyboy18 1 month ago
My GF ass is 2D clearly
MrSuperZangief 1 month ago in playlist Fler videoklipp från minutephysics
550D FTW!!!
BinghamVlogs 1 month ago
I watched this in 2012. :)
Pacheconator122 1 month ago
3 Ds. LIKE MY GRADES !
LawrenceTun 1 month ago 189
@LawrenceTun 2 D's LIKE THAT ONE HOT CHICK!
snake4543 1 month ago
@LawrenceTun That is terrible.
metalock989 2 weeks ago
whoa!…wait…what?
wikkyz4903 1 month ago in playlist MinutePhysics
......what?
JuanSierra1000 1 month ago
apprently i heard from people there are more then 20 dimension but we havent discovered yet is this ture??o---o?
Dahellox3 1 month ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@Dahellox3 11 dimensions
Dnaudio12 1 month ago
wait... higher dimension? what are they??
rockrick1988 1 month ago
@rockrick1988 4th dimension, scientists believe that we live in a 4 dimensional sphere. that 4th dimension is said to be time. so its ( x, y, z, t)... so if we ever build a time machine, time would be a vital coordinate
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
@XxIshxXCwalk ok thanks :)
rockrick1988 1 month ago
@rockrick1988 nop :)
XxIshxXCwalk 1 month ago
This is similar to an observation I made. If you get down to small decimals, you realise that there are equally as many numbers between 1 and 10 as there are between 1 and 1.1. If you just keep adding decimal places and going on, the number of numbers between approaches infinity, just like the number of points on the curve being equal to the number of points in a given space.
MrQStew 1 month ago
I have watched 16 minutephysics videos, some vsouce and SmarterEveryDay. Now my mind is totally fucked
gripa21 1 month ago in playlist MinutePhysics
The 4 dimension is the time dimension.
bart123b 2 months ago
U speak too fast, only see the drawing and understand only 26,7% (or less)
Ivanderjsk13 2 months ago 2
Hi guys!
Well first, I'm not a physisisisisisist (damn grammaer :) so please judge me on the 'easy-level'. However, my question to you guys: Is it possible to assume, we actually ARE on a curled line defined by us as "time" on which we see "space" wich is actually the same line in a different point of view somehow linked to the same time (maybe touching/crossing the "time"-curve? Might it be that the relation time/space is coorelating such as that given us the Illusion of living in a 3D world?
crizzy777 2 months ago
so what does 4-D look like?
blackdragon1426 2 months ago
@blackdragon1426 The 4th Dimension is time.
scampynoXP 1 month ago
@blackdragon1426 We don't know. It doesn't exist here.
TheRinzl3r 1 month ago in playlist More videos from minutephysics
Didn't get a word you said. Sounds like you're educating scientists that already know the terms and physics. Explain it in words where normal people can understand. And don't say that I'm retarded for asking. I'm not a fucking science major. An average person should understand this. Unless your channel is all about refreshing scientists memories.
PsYc01025 2 months ago
@PsYc01025 I'm not a scientist and I understood this pretty well.
Pretty much everything he says in here is really understandable (assuming you paid enough attention in Middle School level shit) Diffusion (molecules spreading out), the three dimensions, curves, etc.
If you're having trouble understanding this video, break what he says and think about it. He's not here to break everything down for you, he only has a minute time frame to present a new way of thinking about shit.
silveRxG 1 month ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@silveRxG Ignore this guy, he's just flashing his internet junk.
FALLoFHalcyon 1 month ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@PsYc01025 This was one of easy videos.....
TheRinzl3r 1 month ago in playlist More videos from minutephysics
thumbs up if ur only watching for the drawings :P
RandomFunnyComedyish 2 months ago
@minutephysics i don't think you understand algebra or topology... there are pretty good mathematical definitions of dimension.
tscct3 2 months ago
i feel stupid
crasite 2 months ago
i used to live in 2d until i took an arrow to the knee
TPeters321 2 months ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@TPeters321 HA you're hilarious! not really...
StellarArcade 2 months ago
@TPeters321 Wow i hate that arrow to the knee stuff
XBabyDollAnimeX 2 months ago
GOD DAMMIT T-MOBILE... I already have a cellular service provider... GAH
RazorsInYourApple 2 months ago
3d is related to Diffusion of Gas.....Strange......!
BiGGeSTLiTTLeFaN 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i just waned to know about 4D . u should explain it to. Watching movies in 4D 0_0
Mr007eds 2 months ago
i just waned to know about 4D . u should explain it to. Watching movies in 4D 0_0
Mr007eds 2 months ago
@Mr007eds The fourth dimension is time. You can think of each dimension as a direction (up/down, forwards/backwards, left/right and next/last).
Nayrbarr1234 2 months ago
Sometimes i think scientists just love making up theorys out of everything
MrFunyyy 2 months ago
@MrFunyyy Because you're to much of a dumbass to understand. Go and read your bible.
killetrocitystick 2 months ago
so... Why does the movie theater charge me so much more for a 3D movie?
gaeta34 2 months ago
...i don't get it...
LoganLevi006 2 months ago
How bout 3 minute physics to explain it properly?
Boolsnburger 2 months ago
*without the.....
mkakati2805 2 months ago
What if we think of dimensions as the basic properties for matter to exist? With the 3 dimensions if space and one of time matter can never exist. We can say the same for energy. So can energy be considered another dimension?
mkakati2805 2 months ago
That would Conveniently explain alot of "Modern" Life, don't believe everything You Think
You See, hehehe*
Rosyheart1 2 months ago
Most, if not all matter can be described in fractional dimensions. The notion of whole number, orthogonal dimensions doesn't match what we can now see.
kokopelli314 2 months ago
We live in 11 dimensions. We can only sense 3... possibly 4.
SmittySmitha 2 months ago
WAT.
coltzlauu 2 months ago
Do 4D!
ckay1100 2 months ago
Try telling my mathmatics teacher the side of a square has for points and I'll have a month of tutoring...
ShiroHero13 2 months ago
@MinutePhysics "every point in space can be labeled just one coordinate"
Could you explain that more precisely, please? It doesn't make any sense to me and I am studying mathematics - and I highly doubt this statement is true!
I do really like your videos, but sometimes I feel like you don't always know very much about the stuff you're talking about, just as in this case.
Convince me of the contrary!
mag2XYZ 2 months ago
@mag2XYZ Fill a box with string (assume there's no space for air left over). Any point in that box can be represented by how far along that string it is. Instead of challenging the knowledge of the video maker, you COULD just google it/use common sense.
s036055 2 months ago 41
@s036055 good example not the best though string in itself is 3 dimensional but i understood what u were getting at
Uebermenschman 1 month ago
@Uebermenschman No that's the entire point. As long as the measuring perspective is 'a' dimensions, you can reference 'a' dimensions with one co-ordinate =). The issue here is people thinking you can use the number of co-ordinates we use to determine the number of planes.
s036055 1 month ago
Should really make a video about the 4th dimension its the most interesting thing ever
muiscnight 2 months ago in playlist MinutePhysics
someone should explain the dimensions above 3 to me
watcherofzideozeszz 2 months ago
We're trying to determine the dimension we're in based on studies in our confined dimension?
TheDivineWinds 2 months ago in playlist MinutePhysics
MY BRAINS EXPLODED
Nombitable 2 months ago
am i the only person who has no idea what hes talking about?
physics is my thing, yet everything you say sounds too complicated for my ears :\
SuperCrazyIdiot 2 months ago in playlist MinutePhysics
@SuperCrazyIdiot im not sure the maker of this video really understand what he is talking about. a quote supposedly from einstein (but regardless who said it, i completely agree with it), says "if you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it well enough"
identification21 2 months ago
What happened to length, width, breadth, and time?
1Mudkip88 2 months ago
Arrgh this is fucking with my mind.
frogjezz 2 months ago
How about we just call it "nerdvision" and move on?
AtomicPengWIN 2 months ago
Isn't it not possible for something to be in 2d?
AwkwardSmileMeme 2 months ago
If anyone knows the name of this theory could you respond, please? :)
EmFanXXX 2 months ago
i love the pretty drawings :D
LovinDragonSlayerJoe 2 months ago in playlist More videos from minutephysics
100D FTW
nour5629 2 months ago 18
@nour5629 Any number of dimensions above 11 would make the universe unstable. How do i know this? Basic string theory.
TheandroidR 1 month ago
You claim we think we live in 3D... But technically the theory is that we are 3D, but living in a 4D universe(with time being the 4th dimension)
garfieldkatt1 2 months ago
most people have 2D minds in 3D world :)
earthlinglife 2 months ago
6D movies :O
fliminthebox 2 months ago
you drew a 4d object on a 2d sheet of paper.... impossiburrrrr
(i know i know, it ain't 3d either, but at least it can be considered a projection of a 3d object)
WolfProductions27 2 months ago
This is a silly theory. We use x,y,z system because it's the easiest way to map any coordinate. There's no right answer. It's not something that already exists, the system is created by people, and the most efficient system should be used. It's just a silly idea.
DustinTROM 2 months ago
@DustinTROM Well that's kind of his point - he's explaining why x,y,z is the best system. He points out that there are alternatives, then says that if you want to describe how gasses diffuse, you better be using three dimensions! It's not so much a theory about what's out there, as an exercise in asking ourselves why we think about things in the way that we do.
DoctorFastest 2 months ago
@DoctorFastest Incidentally, some physicists nowadays are experimenting with working in n-1 dimensions instead of n dimensions (where usually n=11) to see if that makes the maths easier. So far, the maths are too hard either way. ;)
DoctorFastest 2 months ago
so what do 4d look like
narutoxpein98 2 months ago
i wish i could understand one of your vids:(
DarkGraff1 2 months ago
@DarkGraff1 Do you have a question? Someone might try to give an answer.
This is one of the more confusing ones though. It's hard to see what exactly the difference would be between three normal dimensions, and one really weird one that goes through every point. Is this just two different ways of describing the same thing?
DoctorFastest 2 months ago
@DoctorFastest One way to see a difference between the two things is to ask what predictions they make about how things should behave. Gasses spread out in the three normal direction, not along the weird direction that goes through every point. This, and similar results from other experiments, seem to tell us that three dimensions is the better way to describe things.
DoctorFastest 2 months ago
im just watching because of the drawings. derp, im a derp
SlappytheIdiot 2 months ago in playlist MinutePhysics