Amigos da A & E. Nenhuma universidade, centros de pesquisa, revistas técnicas, os cientistas, ASSOCIAÇÕE ns de engenheiros, arquitetos e pilotos de acreditar nas mentiras ea demolição do A & E. O mesmo em
Ásia, Oceania, Canadá, Europa e Sul America.The lista abaixo é today.I tem o link de all.Always encontrar mais sobre as provas internet.There contra as torres e WTC7.Only 0,0001% de USengineers estão em A & E. Sem as universidades do A & E nunca vai convencer o Congresso dos EUA para reabrir anything.The A & E nasceu desertou.
upload the uncut video or else this is complete garbage you faggots, no conclusion at all can be drawn from this video since it's so over-obviously edited.
This is crazy! The Camera skips at a critical moment. They make a point to zoom on the fire, the guy seems to have no compassion, the other guy seems like he is reading a script, and at the end of the video he brings up the fire again! Who the hell would think a fire could bring down a building especially pre 9.11
LOL! 2 sections of footage cuts, at 0:05. good timing for a camera skip! Visible in 0:05 is the roof fully intact, and then a skip and the top section of the roof is gone against the skyline and you can clearly see the bend towards the middle.
it skips at 0:04 and 0:05 like this: full roof ~ some roof ~ no roof xD
Rare video? NO.. I think the rare one is the one without critical frames cut out. This is just more circumstantial evidence.. Why the delay in the release? and Why the cutout frames? are all rhetorical questions at this point having the ability to add 2+2... The cutout frames just scream "COMPLACENCY" from the provider.
The most complete WTC attack video that has ever surfaced is an over two hour video from that day called: 'Tuesday Morning in September'. it is an experience like no other from that day. It is something that was never released .. until nine years after 9/11/2001. You can have a personal copy of the 130 minute chronicle on DVD. Something that the media never had.. something pure from that day that you will hold onto and share with generations to come....
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth"-Albert Einstein
WTC 7 is the key to 9/11. When we try to explain some science to people who have no knowledge of construction and no common sense, they'll tell you its perfectly normal for a building to collapse from fire. Well then, when a building needs to come down, why bother calling a professional demolition team to come in; spend several weeks of careful planning, preparation, and execution. why not just light it on fire?
This would be first time the history of the whole god damn world when three huge buildings have been fell on their own footprints within few hrs without contolled demolitions... pls XD The islamists dont do it that clean. They cause chaotic destruction. What happened on 9/11 it rly asks engineer level planning to avoid "collateral damages". But hey it's never too late to open ur eyes.
Before even reading the comments I had suspicion about the voices in the video. Definitely seems very wierd to me, 3,000 people die right down the street just a few hours earlier and another building collapses out of nowhere, and he talks about knowing the 'sucker' was gonna fall? Get real..
@Ninety9Soulz Why does everything and everytone have to be a part of a conspiracy. So everyone who weren't part of it were never able to turn on a camera... Get real ..
@tommyboy31885 I said 'suspicion', not confirmation. Forgive me for being skeptical about what I see and hear. Perception is only perceived reality.
Go read up on Operation Northwoods, the fast and furious scandal, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident. No event is far-fetched when it comes to government.
I offer two links where it is not accepted the myth of the conspiracy. 100% of the engineering schools reject the myth of the 9 / 11. I have many beyond those below. In the U.S., Canada, Australia, Europe, Brazil and even in communist China. The only benefit in Cuba, Venezuela, Pakistan, Iran and North Korea.
Theres been alot of witnesse and firefighters etc...that have said there were loud secondary explosions going off every 30 sec or so, what bothers me is that a structure made out of steel desinegrates because of fire, i can see it collapsing and elaving behind hugse sections of steel beams where there wasnt a fire but that didnt happen
There is a jump right before 0:06. A half second or so has been cut out, probably to conceal explosions. I think the "gay guys" were dubbed in later. Much later.
@anewell41 OK, but because they missed the start of the collapse, for whatever reason, the video is useless for answering the questions we all have. The "gay guy" comments sound as fake as a three-dollar bill.
Why dont you idiots watch the UNEDITED video of Building 7 collapsing, and see how it collapsed progressively and did not free fall AT ALL.
Fucking idiots watching this edited videos. How ironic that it is YOU being lied to. It really is fascinating how thick you all are.
The UNEDITED version of the building 7 can be seen at ItWasTyped. com under the Building 7 post in the conspiracy theory section. Raging fires and all. The ENTIRE collapse, no editing bullshit.
@Yoshi5020 WTC7 was doomed to collapse and everybody expected it. Its collapse came as no surprise to those who actually saw it bulging, groaning and burning hours beforehand.
@UK31337 It was bulging and groaning and moaning! That explains the simultaneous removal of several floors' worth of support to initiate the free fall collapse. Case closed, nothing to see here people! Seriously though, you need to research free fall collapse and the physics behind it. You cannot have the free fall without explosives. I know it sucks but it's true.
@edyken77 It does explain it, actually. The low boom you heard before the collapse was likely the internal structure failing and a ripple effect causing the insides to collapse from within. The support then failed and the walls fell virtually intact.
You can watch the top of the building collapsing sequentially from left to right as the internal structure failed, then the outer walls gave way and it fell. If you time it you'll discover it wasn't even free fall.
You need to do some more research chum, the NIST report on building 7 shows how it was in free fall for over 20 stories of the collapse. Now stop trying to debunk things that you do not even know the basics about.
@323157 Yeah you know why it was in free fall? Because the internal components of it were failing all across the building. 7 is coming apart internally LONG before the outer shell drops.
Go and look at video of the collapse running along side video of the NIST simulation. I think you'll find that they match up perfectly.
@FnkDctr 7 Was collapsing long before the exterior portion of it came down. The entire top of the building is peeling off backwards (just as described by eye witnesses and just as modeled on NISTS simulation. In fact the NIST simulation and actual footage of 7 line up perfectly. )
Besides.. A team of CD technicians were already there when it came down. I don't need to spell that out for you or what it means.
@FnkDctr You CANNOT have FREE FALL from FIRES. IMPOSSIBLE.
Says who? YOU?... If the structure is coming apart internally there is nothing THERE to hold it up. Why do you think the Penthouse was caving in? Because a main column failed. Which then moved across to other columns. Finally the entire building fell. The column that failed was interconnected to MAJOR support areas.
@FnkDctr LOL. Dude. I am playing with you. They knew it was coming down LONG before it did. You need to read the oral histories from the FDNY. I have it. B7 was evacuated and allowed to burn. I have quote after quote after quote of firemen dealing with it. Fully aware it was in imminent risk of collapse. It was no mystery to them. And nobody heard any explosions or any of that crap. Guiliani was in a meeting uptown. Why would he be there? Its on Fire!!
@UK31337 It was close enough to free fall to be impossible by the official story; wtc7 collapse time=6.5seconds wtc7 height=174m Position(m)=X time(s)=t gravitational acceleration=g=9.81m/s^2 (taking down as positive, with NO resistance of ANY kind (air, floor supports, concrete, windows etc. - you know, stuff buildings are made from) X=g/2*t^2 t=sqrt(2*X/g) t=sqrt(2*174/9.81) t=5.96s Thats 0.54s slower than dropping a ball from the top of the building. With wind resistance, they are almost =
@BF4MJ23 Oh hey!! its the 2+2= 5 guy!! How are you?? LOL!!!
No dude what you need to start questioning is not the bullshit stories of Conspiracy theories. You need to start questioning people who say this building was taken down with explosives.
Trust me. I have been there and i know what this kind of thing is like. You don't have a building "allegedly" crammed full of high explosives and have it make no noise.
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about, if nanothermate was used then it would have been able to take out all the steel beams in seconds with hardly any noise at all. Don't comment on things you do not have the feintest idea about.
@323157 No darling YOU have no idea what you're talking about. You don't slice up load bearing steel columns with a couple of buckets full of thermite. It requires high explosives. Go and call up a demo company and tell them you would like them to use Thermite on your next building implosion.
Then wait for the laughter. Because that's what you'd get.
@tvoidt "Why are you all so hell bent on this conspiracy bullshit? You all think this is staged because you have it in your heads!"
Nope. We have this in our heads because there is substantial evidence that points to that being a fact. Seriously dude, do a bit more research and you'll see for yourself. I suggest for starters that you watch the 9/11 episode of 'Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura.' I can send you the link if you're at all interested.
@tvoidt When a building the size of the Empire State collapses in what looks like a controlled demolition, just after rescue workers and witnesses report hearing explosions and the resulting investigation doesn't mention it, you know there is a conspiracy. Then 9 years later NIST release the results of their investigation and supply a partial simulation of the collapse which bears no similarity to the actual film and witnesses evidence. That isn't science it's a cover up.
No building prior too, or after, has ever collapse because of fire... blah blah blah Zeitgeist movie is accurate.. Steal beams do not melt until roughly 1200 degrees, which is several hundred degrees higher, than jet fuel even burns. done.
This video is one of the many "informative" videos to suddenly appear, which clears up any misunderstandings about what really happened on 9-11, just in case anyone was doubting the government story. There's some other strange videos that "establish" other 9-11 Narative Critical details...creating the depth the cover needs to survive. I do not believe this video is genuine. It's edited at the very least, and the casual actors talking..this isn't some random home movie that got posted.
You're yet another moron attacking the people on the videos who didn't even know what was going on. Your comment is so baseless and closed minded that I'm all but sure you'd have made a comment just as ignorant as his. You're now calling someone an asshole, pretending like you care more about the deaths than a person who saw it happen themselves.
Clearly you don't give a shit about those people yourself if you're using it as your trump card on youtube.
Also you're being a complete jerk to the other 30,000 people who have already died from the asbestos poisoning.
You said it was only 3,000.... So then you don't care about the other 30,000, ten times more people who died in a far more excruciating way and continue to die, more and more every die.
Asbestos poisoning found that the white house heard about on day one, but fluffed it over and let people die from it anyways, just to get the stock exchange back up again.
The CIA must of used silent explosives to bring WTC7 down, I have witnessed many controlled demolitions and all of them had the same boom boom boom as the shaped charges cut through the load bearing frame. and brought the building down. Funny that it's absent here, maybe space aliens introduced a new technique to the CIA ?
Its not a conspiracy when you literally see the building which was avoided by the media and the 911 investigation report falling down demolition style. Do you have no logic in your brain? Are you just going to let the government decide for you? Why don't you just wake up and stop letting the government decide for you fucking idiot.
@gspot6916 Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
Our American skyscrapers are extremely gracile buildings just itching to fall down at the instant a phat executive drops his cigar in the lobby.
I remember the office fires of the 50's, buildings would just fall down flat like a pancake.. One time I farted in an oven and it created an electrical fire which burned for 3 hours, and the whole damn building fell down like a pack of bricks. True story, I have government documents that prove it.
@GarfoyleZanderfield Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
HA HA LOL LMFAO HENRY MOFO KISSINGER THE LUCFARIAN NAZI ZIONIST MOFO SPY JUST LIKE CROWLEY, 4GOT 2 MENTION BUILDING 7 WTF AND YOU DUMB FUCKS STILL DONT CATCH ON TO THIS RITUAL FALSE FLAG INSIDE JOB FUCK THE TERRORIST B.S. THEY ARE THE TERRORIST SO WHEN PEOPLE SAY TERRORIST PICTURE BUSH,KISSINGER,CLINTONS,OBAMAS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AMERICAN MILITARY WORLD ELITE ETC THINK OF THEM MOFO'S
yeah 911 wasn't an inside job, jfk wasn't shot in the front of his face which caused the back of his head to go flying off, the golf on tonkin incident really happened, and pearl harbor was such a suprise to FDR! the bankers and rich fuckers who control the world don't profit from war, do they?? right??
@Feared1AJ oh god suck dick obviously i was joking and pretending to be the majority of the dumbfucks in this country that think their government is jesus.
9/11 ..a total scam, and (at the time it happened) the entire U.S. population were sucked into believing the so-called "official story". Now its obvious the entire event was orchestrated by U.S. elite, with the obvious strategic objectives of oil and military power in the Middle East. But hey, its too late to change what happened, and its not about taking sides. The U.S. War Machine is rolling...its just about where to 'take cover' from what comes next.
@Cricky1975 Are you fuckin stupid or what? That Building was brought down for Insurance purposes not for additional excuses to go to war!! Ya thick Cunt!!
@nelly13tube man dont waste your breath on those sheep..they will never get it nor have the balls that you have on your worst day. This building was clearly a controlled demo. They have NO IDEA that Larry Silverstein accidentally admitted on video that he gave the order to blow it up or "pull". If you know this and still dont see it then there is no point of arguing with them because they clearly dont matter anyways due to being so impotent. What could a person like that accomplish anyway?
@AntBanks2626 Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
What all the ANTI-conspiracy people seem to be saying is: controlled demolition is NOT really a SCIENCE at all! Meaning, if you want a building TO FALL STRAIGHT DOWN, it's NOT an exact science + requires NO PLANNING or expertise! Why? Because the SAME exact results can be achieved by either flying a plane into the building RANDOMLY (2 wtc towers), OR you can just set random fires (build. 7). The "exact" science of controlled demolition is (apparently) a total SCAM, I guess. Think about it!
@marcjtdc Maybe cause he didn't have the camera turned on cause he didn't know exactly when it was going to collapse. Only after he saw it falling did he flip the switch. There are other videos showing the beginning of collapse, why would this be suspicious
@tommyboy31885 Because the other videos don't have a clear audio. This one could have exposed more things or shut down certain views. You can hear a "boom" a couple seconds after the initiated collapse. How fast does sound travel from building 7 and there? It is a distorted truth in itself having missing frames... Leading people to believe more in the conspiracy... and nobody reacts that fast to turn ON a camera. Anybody would have been late to catch anything. Those frames were taken out.
@Fred420ist Why does everything have to be a conspiracy with you guys. So the guy couldn't be outside with his friend and his camera next to him, and turned it on as soon as saw something going on.But there could be an elaborate conspiracy trying to tamper with the video when all they had to do was not release it at all. And how could the government ever take the chance of other videos that could have been filmed and were sent to any public media unedited if there was something they were hiding?
@tommyboy31885 He already had it on. Example: You hear: *Explosion* What you hear is delayed from the source, the building would be down before you could turn your camara back on. Because it was half way down before you heard it. Why is it that people "like you" make judgements about people about people who see obvious anomolies that are manmade. This film was cut like soooo many others. Perfect timing to take out the "money shot" To many clips missing from to many late release videos.
@tommyboy31885 Why wasn't this video available earlier to the public? Why is it missing a :money shot" like others. WHO exactly had it during these years? Why would it not have been given to authorities? Why are YOU so addimant about defending this obvious manipulation? You too seem to have nothing but questions about this also. Lol.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since Larry Silverstein said pull it, demolished WTC 7 and collected billions in insurance, why would the insurance company pay the claim if there's evidence of fraud?
If WTC 1 & 2 were destroyed by demolition & not fire, how do you explain video of the exterior columns buckling under heat & stress loads 18 min after impact?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
@ctcole77 #1. Larry took them to court and won. He claimed two different acts between the buildings represented two claims for payment. The insurance company did not want to pay until ordered by the court to do so as they had reservations as to who did it. The courts position did not include who did the acts, just if they were done or not, as the merit of the case.
@ctcole77 #2. Only at the point of impact was there any type of buckling. When the top portion started to fail, the explosive sequence had to be nitiated at that point to save surrounding structure outside the complex. The complete failure of structure could not be completed as it happened without explosives. Too much evidence has been found of explosives to deny it anymore.
@ctcole77 #3. Who wants to be part of a scene of a crime at the time it happens? The policies and plan was established then control was handed over to a manager. Your questions have been answered. So your arguement is mute.
@ctcole77 Your position is rhetorical. Since bro Bush no longer was there, he had no dealing with any future plans or direction for the company during his tenure? What about Silverstein signing the lease on July 24, 2001, only weeks (48 days) before the towers were destroyed on 11th September of the same year? After Silverstein closed his deal he stated; “This is a dream come true,” “We will be in control of a prized asset, and we will seek to develop its potential, raising it to new heights.”
@ctcole77 WTC before 9/11. From an economic standpoint, the Trade Center — subsidized since its inception — has never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace. The Port Authority had made several attempts over the years to get the permits required to demolish the entire site but were always refused. It would've required $200 million in renovations and improvements to make the buildings rentable.
@ctcole77 There’s the interesting clause to the 99 year lease that included that; although Silverstein was not permitted to redevelop the site, HE DID HAVE THE RIGHT TO REBUILD THE STRUCTURES SHOULD THEY BE DESTROYED so in late July 2001, Silverstein immediately insured his “‘white elephant” buildings. The insurance coverage on the property ‘fortuitously’ covered acts of terrorism. payout was $7.1 billion, more than enough to build a new complex and leave a hefty profit for the Silverstein.
@ctcole77 And all only 48 days after he signed the contracts! Is there any wonder he used his own 14 million dollars and even more of other people money to make that deal? and, If so many BIG people knew that the buildings were not permitted to be demolished due to health risks from asbestos, why were the locals told the air was “safe to breath” immediately after the 9/11 collapse? I will now wait for a response to all the inquiries I poised to you.
The large explosion noise and the collapse of the east penthouse has been removed from this video clip by the 'evil-doers'. Please search for "WTC 7 Guts Itself in 10 Seconds Then Falls- Contrast Enhanced - Contrast Enhanced" here on Youtube to see these events and much more.
@JadedRoy Ok then why did Larry Silverstein admit in an interview that he told the chief fire fighter to "pull it". From the mouth of the dirty cunt himself.
@JadedRoy I read through that website and according to them to "pull" means to get everybody out of their and clear the area or to use cables to pull a building in a certain direction (WTC7 fell straight down), but when Larry Silverstein says it in his interview, he says "maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it, errr and they made that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse." which to me sounds very much like he's making the decision to pull the building with explosives.
@RonBurgundy161 what was Larry Silverstein talking about when he said "pull it"then? The firefighters had reportedly already all been called out from the building and the area before, By 11:30 a.m., the fire commander in charge of that area, Assistant Chief Frank Fellini, ordered firefighters away from [WTC 7] for safety reasons." [New York Times)Fox news (live)reported WTC7coming down BEFORE it had a happened
@HardcoreJungFunk He WAS referring to the firefighters... If "pull it" isn't a demolition term and is never used in the industry, why the hell do you think it was referring to a supposed demolition?
@HardcoreJungFunk I see that you've offered an opinion concerning Building 7, so I've got a very specific question for you regarding same. I think it is an important question as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.) Thank you.
@azul8811 answer: it doesn't matter who let the police/firefighters know it was going to collapse. The fact remains that it collapsed at freefall speed for a portion of the collapse, which is ironclad proof of explosives.
@64adamw64 It collapsed at that speed because generally speaking, a building doesn't fall one floor at a time over a span of time. When one floor falls, the force from that fall would instantaneously cause the next floor to collapse, and so on. And, as more and more floors fall, the amount speed gained from each story collapsing would keep increasing because of the increasing amount of weight of the upper floors, thus increasing the momentum of the collapsing portion.
@marvelfannumber1 /watch?v=Ml_n5gJgQ_U ..................... WTC7 fell in 7 seconds, falling at a perfectly coincidental free fall speed I see, just like wtc 1+2... Still believe the US govt?
@marvelfannumber1 klstorybro, just so you know they blow the middle column first (which is why the penthouse caved inwards) so that the building falls in on itself, otherwise the building would collapse outwards onto the buildings a few feet away. Then they blow the rest of it and it all falls into its basement in a pile of dust. Magic.
@marvelfannumber1 klstorybro, just so you know they blow the middle column first (which is why the penthouse caved inwards) so that the building falls in on itself, otherwise the building would collapse outwards onto the buildings a few feet away. Then they blow the rest of it and it all falls into its basement in a pile of dust. Magic.
@64adamw64 get an architecture degree and figure it out yourself then. why would the government want to blow up the buildings?????? dumbass conspiracy theorists, shit they'd believe strawberry jam is a conspiracy if you told them the govenment paid them to make it.
@nickarry They did it so that they could have an excuse to go to war in Iraq for oil. It's been going on for hundreds of years, such as Hitler blaming the Jews for their WW1 defeat. If you passed History in school you would have known that. And why do I need an architecture degree when there are thousands of controlled demolition experts agree that it was controlled? Your too dumb to think for yourself and stop believing everything the govt tells you, they always lie, everyone knows that.
@64adamw64 Tell me how it can be charges. The steel beams that support the buildings (trade centers and 7 tower) are strong. They take a wile to become weak. When they couldn't support the weight anymore, each floors beams gave out exactly the same time BECAUSE of the weight above. Example: make a card house but make it tall. Now drop a small book on the tall card house. This will result in the cards falling in a perfect free fall because they cant withstand the weight of the book coming down.
@tehetahatoho WOW..except these arent cards..they are steel beams treated with high temperature coats to withstand jetliner impacts and 250 mph winds without collapsing. You are not an engineer and its clear that you drive trucks or fix cars or something like that. Stop making up your own explanations for the govt because thats not even what they said happened. So according to you...u know more than the U.S govt. AND Architects and Engineers for 911 truth....?....
@AntBanks2626 Are you fucking retarded? Did you just say that they are supposed to withstand jetliner impacts? Its idiots like you why Twin Tower engineers and architects got sewed millions. A building is not supposed to withstand jetliner impacts. I don't give a fuck how fast the jet is going. And myth busters did a test. They burned steal beams at high temperatures and they lasted for about 30-1 hr and then gave out. JUST LIKE THE FUCKING TOWERS DID. Go back to school. Learn some shit.
Amigos da A & E. Nenhuma universidade, centros de pesquisa, revistas técnicas, os cientistas, ASSOCIAÇÕE ns de engenheiros, arquitetos e pilotos de acreditar nas mentiras ea demolição do A & E. O mesmo em
aczjbr 2 hours ago
Ásia, Oceania, Canadá, Europa e Sul America.The lista abaixo é today.I tem o link de all.Always encontrar mais sobre as provas internet.There contra as torres e WTC7.Only 0,0001% de USengineers estão em A & E. Sem as universidades do A & E nunca vai convencer o Congresso dos EUA para reabrir anything.The A & E nasceu desertou.
aczjbr 2 hours ago
Scientific American. com
Enr.com - Engeneerin notícias
Jornal de Engenharia Mecânica ASCE
Incêndio Engenharia de Proteção
Desnotícias.
Popular Mechanics
Século Dynamics, Inc.Concord, CA,
Myers, Houghton & Partners, Engineersm Inc.Structural, Pacific Coast
DeStefano Associates, e é sócio na firma de Parceiros Engenharia Costeira.
aczjbr 2 hours ago
Teng & Associates, Inc. em Chicago.
American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, Chicago (AISC),
Sociedade Americana de Engenheiros Civis (ASCE), 123 mil membros
American Institute of Architects (AIA), 80.000 membros
Associação de Indústria de parede e de teto, 2.000 membros que são principalmente de parede e teto empreiteiros
American Concrete Institute (ACI), 20.000 membros abrangendo 108 países.
Conselho Americano de empresas de engenharia (ACEC), 6.000 empresas
aczjbr 2 hours ago
Sociedade Americana de Engenheiros Mecânicos (ASME), 120.000 membros
Instituto Americano de Aeronáutica e Astronáutica (AIAA), 35.000 membros
American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), 40.000 membros
American Standards Institute (ANSI), 125 mil e 3,500 membros Empresas mil.
Sociedade Internacional de Metalografia,
Instituto de Engenheiros estruturais Association of New York (SEAoNY),
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 370 mil membros
aczjbr 2 hours ago
Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 15.000 membros
Conselho Nacional das Associações de Engenheiros estruturais (NCSEA), 12 membros mil,
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 70.000 pessoas em todo o mundo,
Estruturais Engineering Institute (SEI),
Society for Fire Protection Engineering (SFPE),
Atlantic International University, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Miami
Columbia University, Fundação Escola de Engenharia e Ciências Aplicadas
aczjbr 2 hours ago
California Polytechnic State University, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental
Cornell University, Escola de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental e Departamento de Ciências do Solo da colheita
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Departamento de Engenharia,
Michigan State University, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental
Northwestern University, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental,
Princeton University, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental
aczjbr 2 hours ago
Universidade de Illinois em Urbana-Champaign, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental,
Universidade da Califórnia, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental
Academia Nacional de Engenharia,
Universidade da Pensilvânia, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental,
Universidade de Maryland, Department of Fire Engenharia de Proteção,
State University of New York, em Buffalo, Departamento. De civil, estrutural e de engenharia
Stanford University, Departamento de Engenharia Civil,
aczjbr 2 hours ago
Universidade de Wisconsin-Green Bay, Naturais e Ciências Aplicadas,
Universidade de Perdue, Escola de Engenharia Civil,
Universidade de Arizona, Departamento de Engenharia Civil,
Universidade de Colorado, Departamento de Engenharia Civil,
Universidade de Louisville, Departamento de Urbanismo e Relações Públicas
Universidade de Akron, Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica
aczjbr 2 hours ago
Universidade do Texas em El Paso, Departamento de Ciência da Computação e Departamento de Administração Pública
Universidade de Delaware, Departamento de Sociologia, Justiça Criminal, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental
Virginia Polytechnic Institute e State University,
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, Departamento de Engenharia,
Washington State University, Departamento de Ciência Política, Justiça Criminal, Faculdade de Engenharia Elétrica. e Ciência da Computação,
aczjbr 2 hours ago
Man, that voice from the guy that says no 8 times...
Weslietje 1 day ago
The internet always had loud dumb people. But I never seen anything quite as bad as Youtube.
JuliusIsMe 1 day ago
yeah, keep telling yourself it wasn't an inside job....
Aboertmann 1 week ago
@Aboertmann Yea keep telling yourself it was.
MEZKAHN 1 week ago
upload the uncut video or else this is complete garbage you faggots, no conclusion at all can be drawn from this video since it's so over-obviously edited.
faggots
Tautoulogic 1 week ago
This is crazy! The Camera skips at a critical moment. They make a point to zoom on the fire, the guy seems to have no compassion, the other guy seems like he is reading a script, and at the end of the video he brings up the fire again! Who the hell would think a fire could bring down a building especially pre 9.11
shorfilmman 2 weeks ago 2
Collapse my ASS!!!
Harzburgitic 2 weeks ago
LOL! 2 sections of footage cuts, at 0:05. good timing for a camera skip! Visible in 0:05 is the roof fully intact, and then a skip and the top section of the roof is gone against the skyline and you can clearly see the bend towards the middle.
it skips at 0:04 and 0:05 like this: full roof ~ some roof ~ no roof xD
UrSoMeanBoss 2 weeks ago
Thank you Gene Cappa, for all your investgative journalism....
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
This is how it collapsed..
watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=iEuJimaumW4
JMcMac21 2 weeks ago
planted video, missing key frames, with what *seems* like dubbed audio simply put in to buttress the official story (lie) on WTC7.
but would be nice if we could find out who shot this, and see the entire CLIP, without frames removed.
anonymouscommentss 3 weeks ago
Rare video? NO.. I think the rare one is the one without critical frames cut out. This is just more circumstantial evidence.. Why the delay in the release? and Why the cutout frames? are all rhetorical questions at this point having the ability to add 2+2... The cutout frames just scream "COMPLACENCY" from the provider.
Fred420ist 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The most complete WTC attack video that has ever surfaced is an over two hour video from that day called: 'Tuesday Morning in September'. it is an experience like no other from that day. It is something that was never released .. until nine years after 9/11/2001. You can have a personal copy of the 130 minute chronicle on DVD. Something that the media never had.. something pure from that day that you will hold onto and share with generations to come....
Supersynapsis 3 weeks ago
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth"-Albert Einstein
WTC 7 is the key to 9/11. When we try to explain some science to people who have no knowledge of construction and no common sense, they'll tell you its perfectly normal for a building to collapse from fire. Well then, when a building needs to come down, why bother calling a professional demolition team to come in; spend several weeks of careful planning, preparation, and execution. why not just light it on fire?
MyCityToronto1 1 month ago
This would be first time the history of the whole god damn world when three huge buildings have been fell on their own footprints within few hrs without contolled demolitions... pls XD The islamists dont do it that clean. They cause chaotic destruction. What happened on 9/11 it rly asks engineer level planning to avoid "collateral damages". But hey it's never too late to open ur eyes.
Scumbot404 1 month ago
Before even reading the comments I had suspicion about the voices in the video. Definitely seems very wierd to me, 3,000 people die right down the street just a few hours earlier and another building collapses out of nowhere, and he talks about knowing the 'sucker' was gonna fall? Get real..
Ninety9Soulz 1 month ago
@Ninety9Soulz Why does everything and everytone have to be a part of a conspiracy. So everyone who weren't part of it were never able to turn on a camera... Get real ..
tommyboy31885 1 month ago
@tommyboy31885 I said 'suspicion', not confirmation. Forgive me for being skeptical about what I see and hear. Perception is only perceived reality.
Go read up on Operation Northwoods, the fast and furious scandal, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident. No event is far-fetched when it comes to government.
Ninety9Soulz 1 month ago
very calm reaction? curious my friends, very curious
imHIGHasFUCK420 2 months ago
they cleared the street saying bombs were planted and sudenly it gets no mention.
zenoist2 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I offer two links where it is not accepted the myth of the conspiracy. 100% of the engineering schools reject the myth of the 9 / 11. I have many beyond those below. In the U.S., Canada, Australia, Europe, Brazil and even in communist China. The only benefit in Cuba, Venezuela, Pakistan, Iran and North Korea.
Please join to access the link.
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
World Trade Center 7 Relatório Coloca Teoria 11/09 Conspiracy to Rest
Read more: World Trade Center 7 Relatório Coloca Teoria 11/09 Conspiracy to Rest - Popular Mechanics
w w w . popularmechanics com. / tecnologia / engenharia / arco hitecture/4278874
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Structure Magazine - A Join Publication of NCSEA / CASE / SEI
How the Loss of One Column May Have Led to the Collapse of WTC 7 - Ramon Gilsanz, PE, SE, Willa Ng
w w w . structuremag . org / article . aspx?articleID = 284
aczjbr 2 months ago
Theres been alot of witnesse and firefighters etc...that have said there were loud secondary explosions going off every 30 sec or so, what bothers me is that a structure made out of steel desinegrates because of fire, i can see it collapsing and elaving behind hugse sections of steel beams where there wasnt a fire but that didnt happen
BF4MJ23 2 months ago
There is a jump right before 0:06. A half second or so has been cut out, probably to conceal explosions. I think the "gay guys" were dubbed in later. Much later.
Skeptic121 2 months ago 23
@Skeptic121 maybe he quickly started filming after he saw the building was going
Weslietje 1 day ago
@Weslietje That would not account for the jump cut.
Skeptic121 1 day ago
@Skeptic121 They probably stopped recording because it did burn for a while. Then recorded as soon as it collapsed.
anewell41 1 day ago
@anewell41 OK, but because they missed the start of the collapse, for whatever reason, the video is useless for answering the questions we all have. The "gay guy" comments sound as fake as a three-dollar bill.
Skeptic121 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why dont you idiots watch the UNEDITED video of Building 7 collapsing, and see how it collapsed progressively and did not free fall AT ALL.
Fucking idiots watching this edited videos. How ironic that it is YOU being lied to. It really is fascinating how thick you all are.
The UNEDITED version of the building 7 can be seen at ItWasTyped. com under the Building 7 post in the conspiracy theory section. Raging fires and all. The ENTIRE collapse, no editing bullshit.
Intelligent people welcome
culturebully3 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE MOST COMPLETE VIDEO CHRONICLE OF THE 911 ATTACKS '
'Tuesday Morning in September'. Available on DVD. Runtime 130 minutes...
TuesMorninginSept911 3 months ago
Wow this dude sounds ridiculously calm about the whole thing.. Guess he was nice and baked or something lol.
Cherrywoo77 3 months ago
"I told you that sucker was gonna go!"
Haha... as if that would be the first natural reaction from ANYONE.
Nice try guys.
Yoshi5020 3 months ago 17
it was from him. and after watching the other two buildings go down with fires, why not? he was right after all. @Yoshi5020
Mgorky 3 months ago
@Yoshi5020 WTC7 was doomed to collapse and everybody expected it. Its collapse came as no surprise to those who actually saw it bulging, groaning and burning hours beforehand.
UK31337 3 months ago
@UK31337 It was bulging and groaning and moaning! That explains the simultaneous removal of several floors' worth of support to initiate the free fall collapse. Case closed, nothing to see here people! Seriously though, you need to research free fall collapse and the physics behind it. You cannot have the free fall without explosives. I know it sucks but it's true.
edyken77 2 months ago
@edyken77 It does explain it, actually. The low boom you heard before the collapse was likely the internal structure failing and a ripple effect causing the insides to collapse from within. The support then failed and the walls fell virtually intact.
You can watch the top of the building collapsing sequentially from left to right as the internal structure failed, then the outer walls gave way and it fell. If you time it you'll discover it wasn't even free fall.
UK31337 2 months ago
@UK31337
You need to do some more research chum, the NIST report on building 7 shows how it was in free fall for over 20 stories of the collapse. Now stop trying to debunk things that you do not even know the basics about.
323157 2 months ago
@323157 Yeah you know why it was in free fall? Because the internal components of it were failing all across the building. 7 is coming apart internally LONG before the outer shell drops.
Go and look at video of the collapse running along side video of the NIST simulation. I think you'll find that they match up perfectly.
roquefortfiles 2 months ago
@roquefortfiles You cant have free fall without simultanoues structural failure.
If it was standing, it had resistance.
Next second, its free falling.
All support beems must have failed within a split second to create free fall which is IMPOSSIBLE from fires.
NIST confirmed free fall, NIST confirmed fires the cause. NIST confirmed WTC 7 was a lie, an inside job, and did not happen from terrorists.
roquefortfiles, debunk me please, prove 9/11 was NOT an inside job.
FnkDctr 2 months ago
@FnkDctr 7 Was collapsing long before the exterior portion of it came down. The entire top of the building is peeling off backwards (just as described by eye witnesses and just as modeled on NISTS simulation. In fact the NIST simulation and actual footage of 7 line up perfectly. )
Besides.. A team of CD technicians were already there when it came down. I don't need to spell that out for you or what it means.
Unless you're an idiot?
roquefortfiles 2 months ago
@roquefortfiles "7 Was collapsing long before the exterior portion of it came down. "
Proof?
"The entire top of the building is peeling off backwards (just as described by eye witnesses "
eye witnesses saw the top of the building? LOL?!?!
proof?
"In fact the NIST simulation and actual footage of 7 line up perfectly."
great, that confirmed free fall. Which is IMPOSSIBLE from fires. your point moron?
What does CD have to do with WTC 7 free falling?
conspiracy theorist
FnkDctr 2 months ago
@roquefortfiles you can sit here and be an uneducated pathetic troll all you want.
The fact that NIST confirmed WTC 7 was free fall means that FIRES ARE AN IMPOSSIBLE CAUSE OF COLLAPSE.
You CANNOT have FREE FALL from FIRES. IMPOSSIBLE.
What part of FREE FALL + FIRES = IMPOSSIBLE dont you get?
This is 7th grade science. Anyone can jump off their roof and debunk the official story.
Unless you're an idiot?
duhhhbunker!??!
You wouldnt be a debunker if you knew the facts.
FnkDctr 2 months ago
@FnkDctr You CANNOT have FREE FALL from FIRES. IMPOSSIBLE.
Says who? YOU?... If the structure is coming apart internally there is nothing THERE to hold it up. Why do you think the Penthouse was caving in? Because a main column failed. Which then moved across to other columns. Finally the entire building fell. The column that failed was interconnected to MAJOR support areas.
Besides. A CD team was already there.
Kinda stupid silly stories!!
roquefortfiles 2 months ago
@roquefortfiles Says the laws of physics. LOL
You cannot have free fall with support or resistance.
"Which then moved across to other columns. Finally the entire building fell"
You just confirmed a gradual collapse when you said, "moved across to other columns"
Exactly. If this was true for the ENTIRE COLLAPSE, Then it would have fallen ACROSS or SLOWLY as supports started to fail.
A simultaneous structural failure is IMPOSSIBLE from fires and so is free fall. FACT.
FnkDctr 2 months ago
@FnkDctr Oh. I see.
So what was responsible for it then?
And keep in mind just about everyone and their dog were expecting this building to come down.
And a team of Demolition experts were already there watching collapse as well.
If you can come up with the year book answer I am waiting
roquefortfiles 2 months ago
@roquefortfiles "So what was responsible for it then?"
You tell me? This is why we demand another investigation.
I have questions the government and NIST cannot answer.
Why did EVERYONE and their "dog" expect WTC 7 to collapse and NOT the other WTC buildings that had much more damage?
Why wasnt Guiliani in WTC 7 when that was his BUNKER built after 1993 IN CASE OF TERRORIST ATTACKS ON THE WORLD TRADE CENTERS?
Guiliani knew the WTC was going to collapse, who told him?
FnkDctr 2 months ago
@FnkDctr LOL. Dude. I am playing with you. They knew it was coming down LONG before it did. You need to read the oral histories from the FDNY. I have it. B7 was evacuated and allowed to burn. I have quote after quote after quote of firemen dealing with it. Fully aware it was in imminent risk of collapse. It was no mystery to them. And nobody heard any explosions or any of that crap. Guiliani was in a meeting uptown. Why would he be there? Its on Fire!!
Helloooo!!
roquefortfiles 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@roquefortfiles "And a team of Demolition experts were already there watching collapse as well.
If you can come up with the year book answer I am waiting"
What does that have to do with anything?
I bet a lot of people were there, its NYC. I was there on 9/12.
Whats the yearbook question?
NIST confirmed WTC 7 was free fall, IMPOSSIBLE from FIRES.
Barry Jennings witnessed explosions.
The official story is a LIE.
I dont know the truth, thats why im here
FnkDctr 2 months ago
arielhematsiraky 2 months ago
@Yoshi5020 Exactly. Why do you think the financial center didn't even have a scratch?
MexicanChamp1000 1 month ago
Why are you all so hell bent on this conspiracy bullshit? You all think this is staged because you have it in your heads!
tvoidt 3 months ago
@tvoidt when the government says 2+2=5 we start questioning it
BF4MJ23 3 months ago
@BF4MJ23 Don't recall that ever happening. All of your "facts" are made up.
tvoidt 3 months ago
@BF4MJ23 Oh hey!! its the 2+2= 5 guy!! How are you?? LOL!!!
No dude what you need to start questioning is not the bullshit stories of Conspiracy theories. You need to start questioning people who say this building was taken down with explosives.
Trust me. I have been there and i know what this kind of thing is like. You don't have a building "allegedly" crammed full of high explosives and have it make no noise.
That's where your 2+2 = 5 lies.
Its not possible.
roquefortfiles 2 months ago
@roquefortfiles
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about, if nanothermate was used then it would have been able to take out all the steel beams in seconds with hardly any noise at all. Don't comment on things you do not have the feintest idea about.
323157 2 months ago
@323157 No darling YOU have no idea what you're talking about. You don't slice up load bearing steel columns with a couple of buckets full of thermite. It requires high explosives. Go and call up a demo company and tell them you would like them to use Thermite on your next building implosion.
Then wait for the laughter. Because that's what you'd get.
roquefortfiles 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tvoidt "Why are you all so hell bent on this conspiracy bullshit? You all think this is staged because you have it in your heads!"
Nope. We have this in our heads because there is substantial evidence that points to that being a fact. Seriously dude, do a bit more research and you'll see for yourself. I suggest for starters that you watch the 9/11 episode of 'Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura.' I can send you the link if you're at all interested.
Cherrywoo77 3 months ago
@tvoidt When a building the size of the Empire State collapses in what looks like a controlled demolition, just after rescue workers and witnesses report hearing explosions and the resulting investigation doesn't mention it, you know there is a conspiracy. Then 9 years later NIST release the results of their investigation and supply a partial simulation of the collapse which bears no similarity to the actual film and witnesses evidence. That isn't science it's a cover up.
apbriggs07 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cut cut cut strange strange strange cunt cunt cunt
boppzz 3 months ago
/watch?v=tacYjsS-g6k&feature=colike
chillaxer1993 3 months ago
Is that Tom Hanks?
doctorseaweed2 3 months ago
No building prior too, or after, has ever collapse because of fire... blah blah blah Zeitgeist movie is accurate.. Steal beams do not melt until roughly 1200 degrees, which is several hundred degrees higher, than jet fuel even burns. done.
3eyeswider 3 months ago
Comment removed
Walldy1989 3 months ago
I question the cut right before the building begins falling....er should I say "pulled"...
KurthBemis 3 months ago
This video is one of the many "informative" videos to suddenly appear, which clears up any misunderstandings about what really happened on 9-11, just in case anyone was doubting the government story. There's some other strange videos that "establish" other 9-11 Narative Critical details...creating the depth the cover needs to survive. I do not believe this video is genuine. It's edited at the very least, and the casual actors talking..this isn't some random home movie that got posted.
thegooserooster 3 months ago
WHY WAS THE VIDEO EDITED? WHY WAS THE FOOTAGE THAT SHOWS THE EXPLOSIVES DETONATING TAKEN OUT?
gstanz67 3 months ago
Nice scene-cut xD
Boooooommm
Thissuxxxfull 3 months ago
@SergeantPepper99 ermmmmmm dude talk about the other 30000 people in a video about asbestos this is focused on wtc -_-
coasterguy1000 3 months ago
you're an asshole, i tol you that sucker was going to come down, do you even care that 3,000 people died?
3199henrypreston 4 months ago
@3199henrypreston
You're yet another moron attacking the people on the videos who didn't even know what was going on. Your comment is so baseless and closed minded that I'm all but sure you'd have made a comment just as ignorant as his. You're now calling someone an asshole, pretending like you care more about the deaths than a person who saw it happen themselves.
Clearly you don't give a shit about those people yourself if you're using it as your trump card on youtube.
SergeantPepper99 3 months ago
@3199henrypreston
Also you're being a complete jerk to the other 30,000 people who have already died from the asbestos poisoning.
You said it was only 3,000.... So then you don't care about the other 30,000, ten times more people who died in a far more excruciating way and continue to die, more and more every die.
Asbestos poisoning found that the white house heard about on day one, but fluffed it over and let people die from it anyways, just to get the stock exchange back up again.
SergeantPepper99 3 months ago
@SergeantPepper99
30,000 have not died from asbestos exposure at the WTC - why do you lie?
Denierbud11 3 months ago
"The most important part of the collapse is missing from the video. Why ? I've never seen a complete one."
I have. From other angles.
Clarrisani 4 months ago
The US government is really corrupt
the reason behind all of this is to start a "war" and suck other countries petroleum
q8smiley 4 months ago
Thats very strange it as if there was bombs inside already I guess it will be a conspiracy if we say controlled demolition and noone will ever listen
bio3dx 4 months ago
Comment removed
novitamins 4 months ago
why the edit at 0:06??? thanks
danp5648 4 months ago
Disinfo voiceover. Just listen to their conversations, and ask yourself does it feel "real" or scripted.
I told ya that sucker was gonna go
Whatta we do, jump inside?
No
Its gonna come up here
No
Theyre people down there
No
See, that’s why they didn’t try to put that fire out
bitemethehardest 4 months ago
The CIA must of used silent explosives to bring WTC7 down, I have witnessed many controlled demolitions and all of them had the same boom boom boom as the shaped charges cut through the load bearing frame. and brought the building down. Funny that it's absent here, maybe space aliens introduced a new technique to the CIA ?
jdollinter 4 months ago
@ArtificialRed1083
/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100
gspot6916 4 months ago
@ArtificialRed1083
Its not a conspiracy when you literally see the building which was avoided by the media and the 911 investigation report falling down demolition style. Do you have no logic in your brain? Are you just going to let the government decide for you? Why don't you just wake up and stop letting the government decide for you fucking idiot.
gspot6916 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gspot6916 Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
Stupid people still believe the building was brought down by normal fires.
HAHA fucking idiots
gspot6916 4 months ago
Fire brought this building down. silly twoofers.
Our American skyscrapers are extremely gracile buildings just itching to fall down at the instant a phat executive drops his cigar in the lobby.
I remember the office fires of the 50's, buildings would just fall down flat like a pancake.. One time I farted in an oven and it created an electrical fire which burned for 3 hours, and the whole damn building fell down like a pack of bricks. True story, I have government documents that prove it.
GarfoyleZanderfield 4 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@GarfoyleZanderfield Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
HA HA LOL LMFAO HENRY MOFO KISSINGER THE LUCFARIAN NAZI ZIONIST MOFO SPY JUST LIKE CROWLEY, 4GOT 2 MENTION BUILDING 7 WTF AND YOU DUMB FUCKS STILL DONT CATCH ON TO THIS RITUAL FALSE FLAG INSIDE JOB FUCK THE TERRORIST B.S. THEY ARE THE TERRORIST SO WHEN PEOPLE SAY TERRORIST PICTURE BUSH,KISSINGER,CLINTONS,OBAMAS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AMERICAN MILITARY WORLD ELITE ETC THINK OF THEM MOFO'S
777thefreedomfighter 4 months ago
yeah 911 wasn't an inside job, jfk wasn't shot in the front of his face which caused the back of his head to go flying off, the golf on tonkin incident really happened, and pearl harbor was such a suprise to FDR! the bankers and rich fuckers who control the world don't profit from war, do they?? right??
wrestlingfan01 4 months ago
@wrestlingfan01 this may be the single most idiotic comment I have ever read on youtube.
well done.
Feared1AJ 4 months ago
@Feared1AJ sarcasm babe
wrestlingfan01 4 months ago
@wrestlingfan01 what your sarcasm is implying is idiotic. i shouldn't have had to explain this to you.
Feared1AJ 4 months ago
@Feared1AJ oh god suck dick obviously i was joking and pretending to be the majority of the dumbfucks in this country that think their government is jesus.
wrestlingfan01 4 months ago
hmm that video seems prettyyy choppy right at the collapse.... tampering
TrueInLight 4 months ago
edited video
RobHimselff 4 months ago
fake video
oasisoftheseas22 4 months ago
video of explosions liveleak.com/view?i=e46_1316112224
jomdeluise 4 months ago
liveleak.com
jomdeluise 4 months ago
why does the tape "lag" right before the demolition?
willem01 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WE HAVE THE VIDEO OF WTC7 BEING DEMOLISHED. THE VIDEO SHOWS THE EXPLOSIONS AND IT HAS THE AUDIO. ...ARREST LARRY SILVERSTEIN, NOW!!!
SEARCH: "!MUST WATCH NOW! Visible Explosions !NEW VIDEO! SEPT 2011 WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition"
Born2Flesh 4 months ago
9/11 ..a total scam, and (at the time it happened) the entire U.S. population were sucked into believing the so-called "official story". Now its obvious the entire event was orchestrated by U.S. elite, with the obvious strategic objectives of oil and military power in the Middle East. But hey, its too late to change what happened, and its not about taking sides. The U.S. War Machine is rolling...its just about where to 'take cover' from what comes next.
keysphilip 4 months ago
lol the US can't even pull off killing hundreds of their own people, failures.
TikiTubeable 4 months ago
@TikiTubeable seems like they pulled it of just fine...:/
willem01 4 months ago
@willem01 My bad I meant to add "and make it believable" but forgot.
=D
TikiTubeable 4 months ago
Bush Croney: Are we ready to go to war now?
Bush: Hmmmm...not enough happened...Pentagon...Twin Towers...we need some more evidence to make our case for war...
Bush Croney: I KNOW...lets knock down World Trade Center 7...that will show the world!!!
Bush: Yes...do it now.
Conspircy theorists are dumb asses!
Cricky1975 4 months ago 2
@Cricky1975 Are you fuckin stupid or what? That Building was brought down for Insurance purposes not for additional excuses to go to war!! Ya thick Cunt!!
nelly13tube 4 months ago
@nelly13tube man dont waste your breath on those sheep..they will never get it nor have the balls that you have on your worst day. This building was clearly a controlled demo. They have NO IDEA that Larry Silverstein accidentally admitted on video that he gave the order to blow it up or "pull". If you know this and still dont see it then there is no point of arguing with them because they clearly dont matter anyways due to being so impotent. What could a person like that accomplish anyway?
AntBanks2626 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AntBanks2626 Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
So you met elvis presley, JFK, and john lennon
now we find out you were filming 9-11
DAMN U Forrest gump
GerardoIx 4 months ago
What all the ANTI-conspiracy people seem to be saying is: controlled demolition is NOT really a SCIENCE at all! Meaning, if you want a building TO FALL STRAIGHT DOWN, it's NOT an exact science + requires NO PLANNING or expertise! Why? Because the SAME exact results can be achieved by either flying a plane into the building RANDOMLY (2 wtc towers), OR you can just set random fires (build. 7). The "exact" science of controlled demolition is (apparently) a total SCAM, I guess. Think about it!
TimothyWenk 4 months ago
who the fuck in commentating? government shill ass bastard. or a complete idiot. Eh. .
WideAsleep22 4 months ago
even this guy's comentary is debunking 911 myths.
JadedRoy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why edit the most important part of the video? 0:05
marcjtdc 4 months ago
why edit the most important part of the video? :05
marcjtdc 4 months ago 4
@marcjtdc Maybe cause he didn't have the camera turned on cause he didn't know exactly when it was going to collapse. Only after he saw it falling did he flip the switch. There are other videos showing the beginning of collapse, why would this be suspicious
tommyboy31885 1 month ago
@tommyboy31885 Because the other videos don't have a clear audio. This one could have exposed more things or shut down certain views. You can hear a "boom" a couple seconds after the initiated collapse. How fast does sound travel from building 7 and there? It is a distorted truth in itself having missing frames... Leading people to believe more in the conspiracy... and nobody reacts that fast to turn ON a camera. Anybody would have been late to catch anything. Those frames were taken out.
Fred420ist 3 weeks ago
@Fred420ist Why does everything have to be a conspiracy with you guys. So the guy couldn't be outside with his friend and his camera next to him, and turned it on as soon as saw something going on.But there could be an elaborate conspiracy trying to tamper with the video when all they had to do was not release it at all. And how could the government ever take the chance of other videos that could have been filmed and were sent to any public media unedited if there was something they were hiding?
tommyboy31885 3 weeks ago
@tommyboy31885 He already had it on. Example: You hear: *Explosion* What you hear is delayed from the source, the building would be down before you could turn your camara back on. Because it was half way down before you heard it. Why is it that people "like you" make judgements about people about people who see obvious anomolies that are manmade. This film was cut like soooo many others. Perfect timing to take out the "money shot" To many clips missing from to many late release videos.
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
@tommyboy31885 Why wasn't this video available earlier to the public? Why is it missing a :money shot" like others. WHO exactly had it during these years? Why would it not have been given to authorities? Why are YOU so addimant about defending this obvious manipulation? You too seem to have nothing but questions about this also. Lol.
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since Larry Silverstein said pull it, demolished WTC 7 and collected billions in insurance, why would the insurance company pay the claim if there's evidence of fraud?
If WTC 1 & 2 were destroyed by demolition & not fire, how do you explain video of the exterior columns buckling under heat & stress loads 18 min after impact?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
ctcole77 2 weeks ago
@ctcole77 #1. Larry took them to court and won. He claimed two different acts between the buildings represented two claims for payment. The insurance company did not want to pay until ordered by the court to do so as they had reservations as to who did it. The courts position did not include who did the acts, just if they were done or not, as the merit of the case.
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
@ctcole77 #2. Only at the point of impact was there any type of buckling. When the top portion started to fail, the explosive sequence had to be nitiated at that point to save surrounding structure outside the complex. The complete failure of structure could not be completed as it happened without explosives. Too much evidence has been found of explosives to deny it anymore.
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
@ctcole77 #3. Who wants to be part of a scene of a crime at the time it happens? The policies and plan was established then control was handed over to a manager. Your questions have been answered. So your arguement is mute.
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
@ctcole77 Your position is rhetorical. Since bro Bush no longer was there, he had no dealing with any future plans or direction for the company during his tenure? What about Silverstein signing the lease on July 24, 2001, only weeks (48 days) before the towers were destroyed on 11th September of the same year? After Silverstein closed his deal he stated; “This is a dream come true,” “We will be in control of a prized asset, and we will seek to develop its potential, raising it to new heights.”
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ctcole77 WTC before 9/11. From an economic standpoint, the Trade Center — subsidized since its inception — has never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace. The Port Authority had made several attempts over the years to get the permits required to demolish the entire site but were always refused. It would've required $200 million in renovations and improvements to make the buildings rentable.
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
@ctcole77 There’s the interesting clause to the 99 year lease that included that; although Silverstein was not permitted to redevelop the site, HE DID HAVE THE RIGHT TO REBUILD THE STRUCTURES SHOULD THEY BE DESTROYED so in late July 2001, Silverstein immediately insured his “‘white elephant” buildings. The insurance coverage on the property ‘fortuitously’ covered acts of terrorism. payout was $7.1 billion, more than enough to build a new complex and leave a hefty profit for the Silverstein.
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
@ctcole77 And all only 48 days after he signed the contracts! Is there any wonder he used his own 14 million dollars and even more of other people money to make that deal? and, If so many BIG people knew that the buildings were not permitted to be demolished due to health risks from asbestos, why were the locals told the air was “safe to breath” immediately after the 9/11 collapse? I will now wait for a response to all the inquiries I poised to you.
Fred420ist 2 weeks ago
jump inside NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
747legend 4 months ago
Chris Griffin doing the filming
BikerBonno 4 months ago
Bloody idiot. "I told you that sucker was gonna go"
BondComputer007 4 months ago
edited shit
zbysiu666 4 months ago
tom hanks?
Sambw19 4 months ago 37
@Sambw19 LMAO Tom Hanks clearly had the situation handled....
danathor99 4 months ago
The dick holding the camera pushed the plunger for the detonations.
tbirdman1991 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The large explosion noise and the collapse of the east penthouse has been removed from this video clip by the 'evil-doers'. Please search for "WTC 7 Guts Itself in 10 Seconds Then Falls- Contrast Enhanced - Contrast Enhanced" here on Youtube to see these events and much more.
Jackblind1000 4 months ago
Cheap cut out of the detonations..
thelastlonesurvivor 4 months ago
if you believe it was detonated by charges you're retarded.
jpeverlong1 4 months ago
@jpeverlong1 lol please explain how it collapsed in almost perfect freefall without charges then? Dumbcunt believing the US govt LOL.
64adamw64 4 months ago 17
@64adamw64 it didn't, go do some research.
JadedRoy 4 months ago
@JadedRoy Ok then why did Larry Silverstein admit in an interview that he told the chief fire fighter to "pull it". From the mouth of the dirty cunt himself.
64adamw64 4 months ago
@64adamw64 pull means pull the debris, go through this website, they talk about that, : debunking911(dot)com
JadedRoy 4 months ago
@JadedRoy I read through that website and according to them to "pull" means to get everybody out of their and clear the area or to use cables to pull a building in a certain direction (WTC7 fell straight down), but when Larry Silverstein says it in his interview, he says "maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it, errr and they made that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse." which to me sounds very much like he's making the decision to pull the building with explosives.
64adamw64 4 months ago
@64adamw64 "Pull it" isn't a term used in the demolition industry.
RonBurgundy161 4 months ago
@RonBurgundy161 what was Larry Silverstein talking about when he said "pull it"then? The firefighters had reportedly already all been called out from the building and the area before, By 11:30 a.m., the fire commander in charge of that area, Assistant Chief Frank Fellini, ordered firefighters away from [WTC 7] for safety reasons." [New York Times)Fox news (live)reported WTC7coming down BEFORE it had a happened
HardcoreJungFunk 4 months ago
@HardcoreJungFunk He WAS referring to the firefighters... If "pull it" isn't a demolition term and is never used in the industry, why the hell do you think it was referring to a supposed demolition?
RonBurgundy161 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HardcoreJungFunk I see that you've offered an opinion concerning Building 7, so I've got a very specific question for you regarding same. I think it is an important question as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.) Thank you.
azul8811 3 months ago
@azul8811 answer: it doesn't matter who let the police/firefighters know it was going to collapse. The fact remains that it collapsed at freefall speed for a portion of the collapse, which is ironclad proof of explosives.
edyken77 2 months ago
@64adamw64 It collapsed at that speed because generally speaking, a building doesn't fall one floor at a time over a span of time. When one floor falls, the force from that fall would instantaneously cause the next floor to collapse, and so on. And, as more and more floors fall, the amount speed gained from each story collapsing would keep increasing because of the increasing amount of weight of the upper floors, thus increasing the momentum of the collapsing portion.
xLucidNightmaresx 4 months ago
@64adamw64
18 seconds is not freefall ;)
marvelfannumber1 4 months ago
@marvelfannumber1 /watch?v=Ml_n5gJgQ_U ..................... WTC7 fell in 7 seconds, falling at a perfectly coincidental free fall speed I see, just like wtc 1+2... Still believe the US govt?
64adamw64 4 months ago
@64adamw64
Kewl story bro.
/watch?v=G86yuunRBIw
marvelfannumber1 4 months ago
@marvelfannumber1 klstorybro, just so you know they blow the middle column first (which is why the penthouse caved inwards) so that the building falls in on itself, otherwise the building would collapse outwards onto the buildings a few feet away. Then they blow the rest of it and it all falls into its basement in a pile of dust. Magic.
64adamw64 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@marvelfannumber1 klstorybro, just so you know they blow the middle column first (which is why the penthouse caved inwards) so that the building falls in on itself, otherwise the building would collapse outwards onto the buildings a few feet away. Then they blow the rest of it and it all falls into its basement in a pile of dust. Magic.
64adamw64 4 months ago
@64adamw64 That third collapse got Larry Silverstein an extra few billion from his insurance policy.
MsAgnosticatheist 4 months ago
@MsAgnosticatheist Yeah 7 billion I think it was and he only invested 15 million into it.
64adamw64 4 months ago
@64adamw64 get an architecture degree and figure it out yourself then. why would the government want to blow up the buildings?????? dumbass conspiracy theorists, shit they'd believe strawberry jam is a conspiracy if you told them the govenment paid them to make it.
nickarry 4 months ago
@nickarry They did it so that they could have an excuse to go to war in Iraq for oil. It's been going on for hundreds of years, such as Hitler blaming the Jews for their WW1 defeat. If you passed History in school you would have known that. And why do I need an architecture degree when there are thousands of controlled demolition experts agree that it was controlled? Your too dumb to think for yourself and stop believing everything the govt tells you, they always lie, everyone knows that.
64adamw64 4 months ago
@64adamw64 Tell me how it can be charges. The steel beams that support the buildings (trade centers and 7 tower) are strong. They take a wile to become weak. When they couldn't support the weight anymore, each floors beams gave out exactly the same time BECAUSE of the weight above. Example: make a card house but make it tall. Now drop a small book on the tall card house. This will result in the cards falling in a perfect free fall because they cant withstand the weight of the book coming down.
tehetahatoho 4 months ago
@tehetahatoho WOW..except these arent cards..they are steel beams treated with high temperature coats to withstand jetliner impacts and 250 mph winds without collapsing. You are not an engineer and its clear that you drive trucks or fix cars or something like that. Stop making up your own explanations for the govt because thats not even what they said happened. So according to you...u know more than the U.S govt. AND Architects and Engineers for 911 truth....?....
AntBanks2626 4 months ago
@AntBanks2626 Are you fucking retarded? Did you just say that they are supposed to withstand jetliner impacts? Its idiots like you why Twin Tower engineers and architects got sewed millions. A building is not supposed to withstand jetliner impacts. I don't give a fuck how fast the jet is going. And myth busters did a test. They burned steal beams at high temperatures and they lasted for about 30-1 hr and then gave out. JUST LIKE THE FUCKING TOWERS DID. Go back to school. Learn some shit.
tehetahatoho 4 months ago