I don't believe in the huge evolution of everything from one cell, but I do believe that we come from less advanced forms of our species. I don't think humans are descended from rat creatures, but I can see our ancestors being apeish men who were just figuring out how to stack sticks.
@uFEARChuckNorris well, whether im feeble minded or not is up to you, but i can tell you right now, an intelligent, logical, accepting (of new evidence) person, would not believe in creationism. and anyone who argues the theory themselves, or defends people who believe in it are inhibiting the human race. lastly, you can fuck right off.
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T CREATE. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. It only operates once there is life and reproduction and not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. Natural selection is a passive process, not a creative process. The real issue is not natural selection but what biological variations are possible in nature. Read my Internet article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
NOT EVEN ALL EVOLUTIONISTS agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution., including that of Lucy. Even the discoverer of Lucy has disowned his own discovery! These bones were found miles apart, no certainty the bones belonged to the same individual, only forty percent of the bones for Lucy. They can reconstruct whatever they want from these bones. Read popular Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
BLIND WATCHMAKER IS NO ARGUMENT. DNA sequence isn't like a watch. Even if the parts of a watch come together by chance, that doesn't mean the parts could be produced by chance. An incomplete watch can last a long time until its human DESIGNER completes it. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read my Internet article HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE, because of entropy, could not have sustained itself eternally. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
I'd guess that they have no schools in a country where so many "don't believe in" the fact evolution, but I know they have schools in America.. So what do they teach there, I wonder.. No science? : )
America (usa) in general is just stupid.
Miguelc271086 9 hours ago
I don't believe in the huge evolution of everything from one cell, but I do believe that we come from less advanced forms of our species. I don't think humans are descended from rat creatures, but I can see our ancestors being apeish men who were just figuring out how to stack sticks.
JessesanMan 14 hours ago
@JessesanMan then you should research the topic and relieve yourself of ignorance. It's quite a liberating experience.
TSGator100 3 hours ago
because theyre fucking idiots
rdcruick 1 month ago 9
@rdcruick Those who make generalizations typically are feeble minded, and you are a prime example from what I've seen from your channel.
uFEARChuckNorris 1 month ago
@uFEARChuckNorris well, whether im feeble minded or not is up to you, but i can tell you right now, an intelligent, logical, accepting (of new evidence) person, would not believe in creationism. and anyone who argues the theory themselves, or defends people who believe in it are inhibiting the human race. lastly, you can fuck right off.
rdcruick 1 month ago
@rdcruick Also its easier for our dumbfucks to understand "FLOATY MAN UP IN DA SKY DID IT" vs explaining genetic mutations.
1dash800dashRonPaul 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T CREATE. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. It only operates once there is life and reproduction and not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. Natural selection is a passive process, not a creative process. The real issue is not natural selection but what biological variations are possible in nature. Read my Internet article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NOT EVEN ALL EVOLUTIONISTS agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution., including that of Lucy. Even the discoverer of Lucy has disowned his own discovery! These bones were found miles apart, no certainty the bones belonged to the same individual, only forty percent of the bones for Lucy. They can reconstruct whatever they want from these bones. Read popular Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
Mogley52 6 months ago
Comment removed
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLIND WATCHMAKER IS NO ARGUMENT. DNA sequence isn't like a watch. Even if the parts of a watch come together by chance, that doesn't mean the parts could be produced by chance. An incomplete watch can last a long time until its human DESIGNER completes it. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read my Internet article HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 6 months ago
@Mogley52 It wouldn't be a slight change in a muscle, it would be multiple changes in multiple organs over multiple generations.
FantomL0rd 5 months ago
@Mogley52 How about you read an actually peer reviewed science book on the subject? Cause what you just spouted was utter crap.
nanaforiod 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE, because of entropy, could not have sustained itself eternally. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 6 months ago
@Mogley52 - Fuck off you annoying troll nobody is buying the shit you're dishing out.
You fail at being a failtard.
Leonis1989 5 months ago
I'd guess that they have no schools in a country where so many "don't believe in" the fact evolution, but I know they have schools in America.. So what do they teach there, I wonder.. No science? : )
winterstellar 7 months ago