Added: 4 years ago
From: broadcast113
Views: 400,772
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (2,084)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • My ass that a plane can fit in that hole and check any plane crash except 9/11!!! U will see all this debree everywer

  • I don't know how a jet aircraft could fit in that hole. It's too bad we can't get all the facts!

  • watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs

    Pentagon video, paused & zoomed in.

  • @mrh785

    Witnesses who saw a plane = 130+

    Witnesses who saw a missile = ZERO

    911 TRUTH = 911 LIES

  • Comment removed

  • Air Force didn't intercept, Pentagon defenses didn't fire on "hijacked plane". At this time both WTC towers had been hit, 35 & 55 minutes prior.

    How can this happen? Washinton is NEVER left lightly defended yet a jet that was known to have been hijacked gets into the best defended air space in the U.S. & makes it all the way to its target.

  • watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs

    Here's the "plane" that hit the pentagon.

    How many people where supposed to be on that "flight"?

  • All anyone needs to do is watch the pentagon security check point video. Whatever it is in that video it's NOT big enough to be the flight it's said to be.

    Official explanation = bullshit

  • @mrh785

    All anyone needs to do is ask 911 twoofers why they won't answer the questions.

    911 TRUTH = 911 LIES

  • THERE WERE NO PLANES. THERE WERE NO PLANES, IF YOU BELIEVE THAT THERE WERE PLANES GO FUCKING KILL YOURSELF YOU FUCKING MORONS. THERE. WERE. ABSOLUTELY. NO. FUCKING. PLANES.

  • As usual, the twoofer cults edit videos to make it seem like reporters on the scene say theire was no plane, but if you look at the rest of the videos which they leave out, you'd realize THEY DID see planes!!

    Further proof that the so-called "9/11 truth movement" doesn't really care about TRUTH, regardless of what they CALL THEMSELVES!

  • None of you plane deniers can explain the passenger jet wreckage photos including fuselage pieces in American Airlines colours = FAIL

  • @Spindry96 funny how that debris was nowhere to be found on 9/11.

  • @mrh785 No debris??? A 5 year old could google and find the photos of the American Airlines wreckage yet you toofers are somehow unable too

  • Comment removed

  • @Spindry96 I guess you didn't SEE THE "OFFICAIL" 911 commisioned "engineers" videos WHICH STATED THE REASON THERE WAS NO WRECKAGE AT THE PENTAGON AND NO DAMAGE TO THE LAWN WAS, wait for it , wait for it , THE PLANE DISSINTEGRATED INTO THE PENTAGON!, this is the offical version. Like we said SCIENCE VERSES PROGRAMMED EMOTIONAL RESPONSES, the only thing YOU THINK YOU SEE, ARE CABLE SPOOLS THAT WERE THERE BEFORE, due to that part of the pent. having construction active. Good Luck 2 you.

  • @ibeawakened

    "Science?" BULLSHIT!

  • @ibeawakened l guess you somehow never saw the photos of the plane wreckage both inside and outside the Pentagon including fuselage pieces in American Airlines colours. Oh one other thing anyone who uses CAPS just reminds me of an angry child

  • @Spindry96 I USE CAPSLOCK BECAUSE I FUCKING LIKE CAPITAL LETTERS. TAKE YOUR PHOTOS OF DIGITALLY ENHANCED PLANE PIECES AND SHOVE THEM UP YOUR ASS.THERE WERE NO PIECES OF ANY AMERICAN AIRLINES OR UNITED AIRLINES OR ANY OTHER FUCKING AIRLINERS ANYWHERE NEAR IN OUT OUR AROUND THE WTC OR THE PENTAGON. IDIOTS. BRAINWASHED IDIOTS.

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    If the Pentagon was hit by a missile and not a plane, what happened to the passengers and crew?

    If flight 77 was a missile and not a plane, what knocked down the pole lights outside the Pentagon?

    If there was no flight 77, please explain how 130+ witnesses reported seeing a plane?

  • @ctcole77 lol, shill

  • @ctcole77 answer to question 1: stop believing the "official reports" that are released by the media because like "flight 93" there WAS NO PLANE TO BEGIN WITH. we were told there was a plane amidst the mass hysteria that was going on so people automatically accepted that as factual truth.

  • @ctcole77 question 2: just like EVERYTHING ELSE - IT WAS STAGED TO LOOK THAT WAY.

  • @ctcole77 question 3: those "witnesses" were given scripts to read of the accounts of what happened according to what the government wanted people to believe. do you honestly believe that the government controlled media would allow people to be on tv telling what actually happened? WAKE UP PEOPLE.

  • @persevereandovercum

    Do you have ANY evidence to support your LIES?

    Or are you just offering your "professional" opinion?

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

  • @ctcole77 EVIDENCE??!?!?!?!? the "EVIDENCE" is all around you douchebag. if you're going to challenge the notion that the great united states would bring about this "terrorist attack" on its own soil to fuel speculation of a country that we gave MILLIONS in weapons and military training to decades ago, had "WMDS" and we had to go in there and get them back, I DONT HAVE TO BE THE ONE TO PROVE ANYTHING IT ALREADY HAS BEEN PROVEN.

  • @ctcole77 and why is it that of all the 'witnesses' to 9/11 who believe planes hit those buildings are the masses of people WHO WATCHED IT ON TV. thats why there are real witnesses who were in new york and in washington who have publicly stated "THERE WERE NO PLANES" PEOPLE WHO WERE WATCHING IT IN REAL TIME WHO SAW BUILDINGS JUST EXPLODE WITH NO SOUND OF A COMMERCIAL AIRLINER FLYING THROUGH MANHATTAN OR WASHINGTON.

  • @persevereandovercum

    Just one problem with you lies.

    Silverstein LOST money on 911.

    Oh, and "pull it" is NOT a demolition term.

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED (2nd time)!

  • @ctcole77 "just one problem with you lies" just one problem that you are obviously some uneducated backwoods fucking hillbilly that posts comments on youtube and can't be grammatically correct when doing so. dude NEWS FLASH!!!! I DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT ANYTHING YOU HAVE TO SAY. YOU'RE A FUCKING MORON. YOUR ARGUMENT IS NOT VALID! LARRY SILVERSTEIN DID NOT LOSE MONEY ON 9/11 YOU STUPID FUCK HE RECIEVED OVER 7 BILLION IN INSURANCE.

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Why did Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor & printing it without her approval?

    How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?

    If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts & how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?

  • @ctcole77 STILL WITH THE FUCKING PLANES, GIVE IT A REST YOURE WORDS ARE MEANINGLESS.

  • @persevereandovercum this guy ctcole77 is a known shill. He'll scream it was a plane, it was a plane until he's blue in the face.

  • @ctcole77 lol so stupid.. 1) everything he has said claims that trace evidence of thermite throughout the building.. 2) maybe everything was set up before june of 2000?? lol pretty sure it wasn't done 2 days before.. 3) lol and demolition bombs are typically set up low to take the base out.. haha who puts controlled explosives at the top of a building?? give it up

  • @prodigy051985 When you collapse a skyscraper in an organised demolition, you would want it to pancake down. If you planted bombs at the bottom only, it wouldn't fall perfectly straight down. It would topple over into other buildings. You would need to time them just right to make it fall straight down.

  • @ctcole77 AND HE SAID "PULL IT" MEANING TO SET THE FUCKING CHARGES THAT ANYONE WATCHING THE VIDEOS OF THE BUILDING CAN SEE BEING SET OFF IN A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. LARRY SILVERSTEIN IS NOT A DEMOLITIONS EXPERT SO HAD NO REASON TO BE QUOTED AS MAKING A REMARK OF DEMO INDUSTRY SLANG FOR TAKING DOWN A BUILDING.

  • @persevereandovercum

    "We have never, ever heard the term “pull it” being used to refer to the explosive demolition of a building, and neither has any blast team we’ve spoken with. The term is used in conventional demolition circles to describe the specifcie activity of attaching long cables to a pre-weakened building and maneuvering heavy equipment (excavators, bulldozers) to “pull” the frame of the structure over onto its side for further dismantlement."

    ImplosionWorld

  • @ctcole77 AND AGAIN YOU COMPLETELY MISSED THE POINT IDIOT. LARRY SILVERSTEIN SAID "PULL IT' MEANING TAKE DOWN THE FUCKING BUILDING HE IS NOT A FUCKING DEMOLITIONS EXPERT AS I ALREADY SAID SO WHY ARE YOU CONTINUING TO ARGUE THAT IN SOME WAY THATS WHAT IT WAS. MORON THE BUILDING WAS BLOWN UP WITH EXPLOSIVES. THE FACTS EXIST THAT EVERYONE INVOLVED PROFITED FROM IT.

  • @persevereandovercum

    Please answer the questions uneducated gullible shill.

    911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN

  • @ctcole77 and WTC7 who was owned by Larry Silverstein who collected 7 BILLION DOLLARS IN INSURANCE AFTER HE TOLD THE NYFD TO PULL THE FUCKING BUILDING THAT HAD BEEN ALREADY RIGGED WITH EXPLOSIVES. GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS LITTLE BOY AND TAKE THE GOVERNMENTS DICK OUT OF YOUR MOUTH.

  • @persevereandovercum right on! You can use capslock if you damn well wish it.

  • @Spindry96 lol i love how people say there was debris all over the place.. umm where exactly did the wings go?? all you see is a hole, so the wings should have ripped right off.. at least the trade center had holes where the wings were.. you people make me laugh so hard

  • @prodigy051985 Sure anyone can claim this or that is odd but thats just conjecture. The photos of the American Airlines wreckage is however solid evidence. The fact that this evidence is there for all to see yet you people deliberately ignore it and instead pretend to be experts about the defense, construction and camera security at the Pentagon is laughable. Since we are on the topic care to explain the wreckage?

  • @Spindry96 no its not just odd.. the videos of the pentagon provided by the government were laughable. they were all horrible quality and didn't conclude anything.. they didn't even belong to them.. they spend all that money on defense and they can't even provide their own videos.. actual witnesses in washington and new york all have different stories.. fool me once shame on..... shame on me..... fool me twice i can't get fooled again.

  • @prodigy051985 Blast expert and structural engineer A.Kilsheimer said "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." He also said "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts." The photos of the wreckage and the poles knocked down that were too far apart for a missile is plenty evidence for me

  • @Spindry96 yeah he held the tail section of the plane in his hand.. do you know how big the tail section of a boeing 757. parts of the crews uniforms?? if the plane was in pieces.. how were the uniforms still intact? sorry man the government did an awful job covering it up, so its no wonder they need half wits like you to try to convince people otherwise.. i understand they messed up.. but people aren't stupid

  • @prodigy051985 People reported finding pieces of crew members in pieces of flight uniform. One flight attendent of flight 77 who didn't fly that day was shown autopsy photos of her fellow crew members and recognised the severed arm of her best friend by the bracelet on it. The gov would not fly a missile into the pentagon and pretend it was a plane because all it would take for them to be totally exposed would have been one tourist photograph the missile. Way, way to risky

  • @Spindry96 first of all what everyone said they saw was not conclusive enough to say it was a boeing 757.. everyone knows that.. cruise missiles have been around since ww2.. thats 60 years.. and i guarantee that not many people these days have seen a live cruise missile... so they don't have much to compare it too... people say that the security cameras at the pentagon weren't advanced enough to catch anything significant on film?? pretty sure that in 2001 our technology was more than enough

  • @prodigy051985 Low quality suveilance film plus a object flying past hundreds of miles per hour will not result in a great image even in 2012. Even the crappy suveilance film shows an object much larger than a cruise missile and the wingspan of a cruise missile is much to narrow to knock down the two light poles. A cruise missile also doesn't jettison plane parts from a passenger jet and fueslage parts in American airlines colours. Pentagon no plane conspiracy = fail

  • @Spindry96 Do the cruise missiles have a landing gear struts (like the one found imbedded in the wall)?

  • @ssmusic214 l don't think you read my comments for obvious reasons

  • @Spindry96

    The light poles were down ahead of time.

    Only one pole was staged to help spread the story

    Staged? Yes, Lloyd and his cab :-)

    Citizen Investigation Team dot com

  • It was a Super Truth GM345 Mark 2 Missile, Jointly designed by the US and Israel. It resembles a passenger jet and on impact it jettisons pre packed plane parts to simulate a accident

  • @geetarslim306 Or it was a missile. The live reports on the day said that it resembled a missile had hit the pentagon.

  • @mosthighoracle

    They actually said it eas a plane that "was like a cruise missile with wings," but you people ignore that part.

  • @DTD110865 The original hole in the pentagon before it collapsed was only 5 metres wide, which is the same as 15 foot wide. There is no way that a 757 hit the pentagon, check out General Major Albert Stubblebine, he is an expert an he is also certain that a 757 didn't hit the pentagon. Mike Waller actually said that it was like a cruise missile with wings. You are not another one that believes every single word of the official story, are you?

    I am 100% sure that it was an INSIDEJOB.

  • @mosthighoracle

    When American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon's exterior wall, Ring E, it created a hole approximately 75 ft. wide, according to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report. The exterior facade collapsed about 20 minutes after impact, but ASCE based its measurements of the original hole.

    The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide—NOT 15 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

  • @ctcole77 You have no credibility, because I know that you are another CO-INTELPRO disinformation agent, I have no interest in arguing with CO-INTELPRO disinformation agents, but I will let everyone know that you are CO-INTELPRO, so that you have no credibility. The original hole in the Pentagon was only 15 foot before it collapsed. Just answer one question for all the readers, do you believe every single word of the official 9/11 story, and if not what parts do you think are bullshit?

  • @mosthighoracle

    "The original hole in the Pentagon was only 15 foot before it collapsed."

    LIAR!

    The hole in the Pentagon was approximately 75 ft. wide, as documented by the American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University.

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

  • Comment removed

  • @ctcole77 Thanks, I'll pass on the disinformaton today.

  • @ctcole77 I only asked you to answer one question, but you failed to answer it, so I will ask you again, for the readers benifit. Do you believe every single word of the official story and if not what parts do you think are bullshit. I will also repeat that you a CO-INTELPRO disinformation agent and therefore you have no credibility.

    You are CO-INTELPRO CO-INTELPRO CO-INTELPRO

    For the readers benifit I will also recommend that people watch 9/11 SECRET REVEALLED on youtube.

  • @mosthighoracle I only asked you to answer one queston, but you failed to, so I will ask you again,for the readers benifit. Do you believe every single word of the official story, and if not what parts do you think are bullshit. I will also repeat that you are CO-INTELPRO and therefore you have no credidbilty.

    CO-INTELPRO CO-INTELPRO CO-INTELPRO

  • @ctcole77 LETS ALL ARGUE OVER THE "OFFICAL REPORTS" THAT WERE RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC YOU DUMBSHIT MOTHERFUCKERS. THERE WERE NO FUCKING PLANES. NONE. NOT A SINGLE FUCKING ONE. NO PLANES. YOU IDIOTS WANT TO JUST CONTINUE TO FEED OF THE LIES PROPAGATED BY THE GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED MEDIA?? BECAUSE THATS ALL YOU'RE DOING.

  • Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Did you know that LHOdidntdoit is an expert in a matter relevant to 9/11? He has 35 yrs exp in building design.

    I'm humbled by his knowledge and amazed at his youthful attitude. Hanging around youtube every day, spreading his knowledge.

  • @mrh785

    "Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane. I think an American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass and it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"

    - "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

  • @ctcole77 WOW, someone nobody ever heard of telling me exactly what the government wants me to hear, and with no proof at all but the word of the Guardian, Yeah they always tell the truth at that paper, how could I have been so wrong, with all that Physics and Science stuff, and especially all the information at Boeings site which for some reason now omits the Speed/Altitude schematics of their 757, Yeah fuck physics and common sense, Omar Campo was their and HIS WORD IS LAW. LOL!

  • @ctcole77 Well, we do have a video we can look.

    watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs

    How many people where supposed to be on that "757"?

    They sure are making things smaller these days.

  • @ctcole77 Well, we all know immigrant gardners can't be bought so your evidence is rock solid.

  • @mrh785

    Are you as skeptical of your precious "witnesses hearing explosions" as you are of flight 77 eyewitnesses?

    911 TRUTH = PICKING AND CHOOSING EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS

  • Definately not a plane, why would US government not show a plane hitting the pentagon if it is the most guarded building on the planet, yet they show 2 "planes" hitting the wtc...this was an inside job believe it or not the government does not give a shit about its people, it only gives a shit about itself....conspiracy's and lies are all its made up of...so Sieg Heil you nazi sons of bitches!

  • @dDevil113 I do think that this was an inside job, but I also think that if they release a video of a plane hitting the pentagon everyone will say its fake. Dont you think?

  • @monsteripolo i agree with that it was an inside job, but i also think that the best place to hide something is in plain site. because 'seeing is beleiving', as im sure those debunkers will say

  • so when they recovered parts of the airplane like the engine and other stuff which i no they were their becaue theirs photos of them being their!!! but what i no missile dont have engines on or in them and they cant take out 5 or 6 lamp posts so what to believe missile or plane?

  • No plane? This was found: 757 rim, 757 turbine, blue 757 seats, fuselage wreckage with "American" logo visible, Rolls Royce RB211 engine parts, structural wreckage matching Boing paint primer schemes, 60+ bodies matching the passenger and flight crew list and returned to the families

  • @Spindry96 do fuck off shill, thats just sheer desperation now isnt it, made up out of thin air!!! we all know about cointelpro, 9/11 was an isnide job, no airliner ever hit the pentagon

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Ahh l love the smell of angry childish truther in the morning. lt's your wacky theory but your incapable of debating it and instead resort to angry abuse.... sad

  • @Spindry96 im saying no airliner ever hit the pentagon, and u say its 'childish debate'???? what are we talking about here? WTC that was blown up? molten steel? put options? do i see a plane here?? no? plane damage? no! bodies?? no, its ok, the cctv will tell all, but they wont show it to us! 2 vids released, neither show a plane! a contradictory made up 'eyewitness' list?? wow!! hang on, rumsfeld, tim roemer, mike walters and charlie lewis said 'missile'...jeeez shill your not very good at this

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Let me debate your points. Do fuck off truther.... Hmm did you find that comment childish? Wow just like l found yours childish

  • @Spindry96 lol, shill

  • watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs

  • watch?v=tvhXmJ_w9ZI

  • the pentagon was a test site for the drones we us today

  • Well knowing how well planes can withstand to a Huge solid object at around 400 miles per hour it is safe to say the the plane would have been Completely destroyed at impact while all of the heavy objects would have penetrated the building. Basic physics Also bits and pieces of aluminum where found around the site. lamp posts where knocked down on the exact same route as the plane went on.

  • @wingercalFORNIA1234 all the heavy pieces penetrated the building??? so the wings didnt shear off, hit the ground, fold back, 'turn to vapor' etc??? which is it please??? it cant be all of them!!! why are there no wingmarks on the wall before they blew the roof to cover this (still no wing marks, even after roof C.D!)

  • "ex-navigator" LOL, NOW I KNOW YOU'RE A LIAR.

  • Wait a minute.. You guys don't think a plan crashed into the Pentagon? The Pentagon is the most monitored building in the world next to Ft Knox. You'd think that they could produce ONE fricken picture of an airplane. If you look at pictures of the hole that the "plane" caused, (look it up online), you will see a parking sign posted on the building. FBI confiscated all surveillance from adjacent buildings. WTC 7?  I think the only thing made out of solid brick are your heads.

  • @DustinRoaches YES...the sign is what did it for me...and let's not forget the undisturbed book. All of that "fuel burning" and the book had not been disturbed...

  • Air Force didn't intercept "hijacked plane" & anti-aircraft defenses at pentagon didn't fire. This happend well AFTER both WTC towers had been hit. How can these failures in standard operating procedure happen on the same day??? 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!

  • Breaking uninformed news speculating is the best evidence truthers have?

  • @Spindry96

    LOL yes, ONE person in an interview an hour after the strike said he saw it from a long way off and said "it kinda looked like a missile WITH WINGS" and that's their evidence, it's hysterical how stupid they are.

  • @Blahblobify Lol yes, stupidity is totally inadequate describing them, especially considering there are photos of plane wreckage inside the Pentagon. Nope, it was still a missile...

  • Not in a million years did 19 idiots who couldnt fly a Cessna accomplish this feat without support. Do you believe the official story? Debunk this, USS Maine, Operation Ajax (Mohammed Mossadegh) Operation Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate, The Keating 5 S&L Scandal, Iran Contra, Jaime Roldos, Salvador Allende, Omar Torrijos, Prescott Bush, I challenge anybody to disprove the covert nature of any of these events! Until 5 years ago I bought the "official story" then I saw WTC7 collapse, truth!

  • I swear all the people that say a missle didnt hit the Pentagon must be working for the disinfo branch of the gov..!

  • Retired from Govt USA job at age 32:

    Never 2 work again ....

    And why?  Due 2 American ethics? work ? Thinking? Plots and plans ? Bribes of all kinds ??

    2011.

  • What about George Bush going and meeting a nursing professional from the local Erie County Medical field in New York...during one of the tornado/hurricane damaged areas in the southern USA state areas.... and as she stood on the rubble, he had nodded and went to shake her hand.

    She may have also gone to high school with me or was Professional Principal/teacher and also went before me.... like to my college & taught/worked as staff, then at all jobs and finally at HUD Buffalo at myAge of 30.

  • @guineapiggyman

    for...FUCK...sake.

    Geo-synchronous satellites that maintain the same position over the earth are 24,000 miles up...look it up for youself. A satellite only 400 miles high orbits the earth every 90 minutes and does NOT stay in the same position over the ground.

    My God how can you be so stupid?

  • @guineapiggyman first off I'm not your hun and second if no plane crashed into the pentagon explain why there are plane debris all over the place news video and photographs with american Airlines on them

  • @Texan2525 omg, the only! piece of 'plane' debris was a turbine engine, of the same type used in BALLISTIC MISSILES. there was no back end of a plane or anything. you have a pic of it? show me!

  • @guineapiggyman how would you like me to send them to you besides me pulling them out of my ass haha they do exist and i'd love to show them even though i dont have the rights to them to claim there mine

  • @guineapiggyman do you still want me to show the photographs of the airplane? if so I need an email or some way to send them to you

  • @Texan2525 i would LOVE IT! but sadly, you cant. my email is ethan1985@attDOTnet. awaiting anxiously

  • @guineapiggyman sorry its taking me so long I had to work yesterday and today

  • @guineapiggyman Dont waste your time you twoofer J/K, seriously friend watch Aaron Russo, "Freedom to Fascism" and John Perkins, "Confessions of an economic hitman" then read the book or watch the video by H Michael Sweeney "25 rules of disinformation" After watching these 3 videos you will have, just from reference in the vids, enough information to research for many months.You will be amazed, I promise, then you will know reality. kepp up the fight for your sovereign liberty!! RON PAUL 2012

  • @Texan2525 I've seen those photos, they're fake. It's not the first time "evidence" has shown up years later yet seeming to have been there all along. Be smarter than that people. If they can pull off 9/11 they have the resources to provide "proof". Ask yourself why the plane debris & marks on the lawn weren't IMMEDIATLY visible? Only later did they back off their "desintagration" statement & around the same time pictures of plane debris showed up online.

  • @mrh785 you guys couldn't handle the truth as it is presented to your face as I did because you can't handle the fact our country was attacked by terrorists on our soil taking almost 3,000 lives and yet the only logical thing to do is say its an inside job because you can't believe it that we were attacked by a radical muslim group*who weren't true muslims*

  • @Texan2525 well, I can give ya some credit for not giveing me the standard line "truthers are whack jobs" & so on, thanks for that. I once believed the ofiicial explanation too, I just couldn't anymore. We where told the WTC was closed down for maintanence/upgrades on the weekend of the 8th & 9th & it was only a coincidence. Now the story has changed as the NY port authority is denying that ever took place. Even though former WTC employees have confirmed it happend & have been ignored. more lies

  • @Texan2525 I would disagree, In fact my inability to see the truth was caused in no small part by the fact I had trouble accepting that there are people in this country with power who would do this to their countrymen. I wish it never happend but it did. Whoever is responsible for 9/11 had to have gotten inside those buildings before hand & by definition was an inside job. Do you know who Barry Jennings is? He was the head of E.M. for the whole wtc complex (i think) & he was trapped in WTC 7 >>>

  • @Texan2525 watch?v=_DuSeuxjiJQ That's a Youtube link to a interview by Barry Jennings, He was the Deputy Director of Emergency Management services in WTC 7. He was trapped in 7 most of the day until he was finally rescued. If ya wanna know what happend in that building this the guy to listen to, He was killed 2 days before the commision report came out, I believe he was murdered. I hope you make time to watch it & you can come to your own conclusions.

  • I bet that nobody can prove that a 757 actually hit the pentagon. Check out "It was a Military Plane" on youtube, the second plane that hit the WTC was not a passenger airliner, It was either black or grey and it had no windows. The LIVE reports on the day are very insightful, anyone that was watching LIVE will remember, just like remembering a dream.

  • @mosthighoracle

    Hey dummy if you google it you'll see photos of American Airline flight 77 parts with American Airlines markings all over the crash site.

    137 witnesses saw an airplane.

    Nobody saw a missile.

    Case closed.

  • 9/11 has CONSPIRACY written all over it.

  • There was originally was only a 5 metre hole in the pentagon (about 15 feet), as if a 757 passenger airliner would have fit in that hole, as if any plane would have been able to hit one of the most guarded places on the planet, unless they let it.

  • This reporter here actually later changed his story in 2006, and said that he was taken out of context. Look up Jamie Mcintire changes his story 9/11 pentagon.

  • AKKSDLA

    I hate seeing this. It's makes me upset. I have to remember what happened every time we go through the parking lot to get home. D:

  • 9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is? inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!

  • Watch the video:

    National Security Alert - 911 Pentagon Attack

    And the Truth will set the World free!

  • 'vhulheim' is a known shill. paid by cointelpro to spread BS on this vid, shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs), they are all racist convicted fellons given a 2nd chance in life, peddling the official 9/11 lie for a few tax free bucks an hour, hoping to 'sway peoples opinion'....they fail miserably!!! in 10 years no one has proved that crazy saudis armed with stationary did all this!!! 9/11 was an inside job folks, everyone knows it...google 'cointelpro' for more info on the STDs...

  • to all those nuts saying no plane hit the pentagon, technically you are all correct, the plane hit the ground before hitting the building - this obviously absorbed most of the impact damage. Here's a very good animation interspersed with photo's and video explaining the events. /watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8 -- Most of you that saying this was an inside job are trolls, a few of you are either misinformed or choose to believe in fantasy.

  • @vhulheim

    You're batshit crazy!.....the photo of the first fire truck on the scene showed the lawn looking like a putting green!

  • @vhulheim the plane hit the ground did it eh??? jeeez cointelpro only get what they pay for i guess....

  • @truthseeker0183 you dont make it obvious do u son??? your agenda??? we all know about cointelpro!!! of course 9/11 was an inside job, no planes were highjacked on 9/11!