TURBOS produce extreme boost, but not where it's useful, but produces unwanted heat and frustrating lag... ROTREX is in a sense, a belt driven turbo (simple explanation), it doesn't have lag, but peak boost is still in the high RPM... ROOTS type blowers offer max boost at any speed, the moment you open the throttle, but at high RPM produces heat & power drops quickly...So, what's the answer???...SCREW type blowers compresses internally, and provides the best of both worlds
shucks the car is fast already, why make it a death trap... seriously it sounds cool Turbos for the win but no this car is fantastic with out the turbo LOL ill just get a better ECU
I too believe that a sport ca MUST have at least 2L engine. I also know that performance has to do with power but has to do with weight too. A light car can turn easier than a heavy, so in twisting roads I would prefere a lightweighted car with a 2L engine.
And last thing. Here in Greece, if you own 1.9L and up, you have to pay over 1.000€ or 1400$ per year a so called "driving tax", plus the other taxes for owing a car and great taxes when buying. So small engines are one way.
Any car that is less than 2000 cc (2L) should be banned from being branded "Sport" or mentioned in same sentence with word "Performance". I have one of these, a few weeks old, and it is absolute crap ! Good for teenage girls and old ladies.
You can put 10 superchargers on it and it will still be a piece of s....
I regret selling my 3L GMH, serves me right for going for the "economy" factor :(
@Bomchilaka If you take into account only its power output in KW, I guess you are right. But there are two more things : torque and top end speed. That can not be achieved without big engine.
And btw, my old car was GMH body with factory fitted RB30 Nissan engine. It would blow this thing off the road.
I still think that Swift and other cars of its type are just crap !
I really really hate my Swift, $20000 wasted. It's a pig !!! It just doesn't go !
@tvobssesed I see,thank you for informing me that,i was very closed minded about car information,i thought if you had alot of power it will have more top end speed,but i was wrong.
@Bomchilaka Simple, large engine will always accelerate easier from, for example 70kmh up than small engine. Australian police tested Subaru WRX for highway patrol use, they abandoned it in favor of Ford Falcon V8 and GMH Commodore also V8. Subaru just couldnt accelerate fast enough at speeds over 100kmh... And we always hear how WRX is very powerful when you compare kilowats. After all Bugati Veyron is the fastest car on the market is W16, 8L car...
@jacksean Whole point of my story is : Power comes from burning fuel, period !
Laws of thermodynamics do not allow you to get something for nothing. Only thing you can influence is efficiency of the system (engine). You can burn 2L of fuel mixture and make excellent power output, or burn 5L and get miserable result. I'm sure that Suzuki 1.5L is efficient, but 1.5L for that power to weight ratio won't get you awesome speed and power. When you mention "Sport" I expect BANG Fireworks ! Tyre smoke
@tvobssesed My MX-5 sport is defenately a sportscar. Even though it has a 1840 cc engine. A friend has a car with a 6.1L engine that I don't consider a sportscar. A sportscar is not about engine size, it's about handling, cornering and having fun driving.
Greddy sounds good, but the rest of the engine & gearbox can't cope with the extra BHP and warranty on the car is void. You also need a proper air filter, not that heap of junk you are using! It has a small surface area and big holes, so you are allowing big bits of dirt in to cause damage and wear to the supercharger and engine internals. A proper paper air filter with area of 13ft (compared to your 1ft) should be used to supply FILTERED air, it's not a restriction so don't mislead people!
Yeah they are 2 different types of kits there, depends what you want,
The rotrex kit provides boost that is proportionate to engine rpms, this can be kinder to clutches and gearboxes and the drivetrain because the torque is built up gradually and it peaks at the top of the rpm range, Goofd for high revving apps.
The greddy kit provides an even spread of boost over the whole rpm range usually than less than the centrifugal type these are better on a larger engined car than don't rev that high
@jarrus464 But the elise S/c uses a positive displacement charger and that's a high revving car, so it's not quite that "cut and dry" , the charger itself in the greddy kit will most like be made by eaton and modded by greddy, rotrex make there own chargers like vortech but rotrex's are of a more compact design, which can be preferable, hell Koenigsegg use rotrex superchagers in there car, and you know how fast they are, so they must be good.....
Are you talking 60mph , 9 seconds thats slower than a standard ford or holden. Im looking a buying one of these things are they slow as snails, I know they handle ok but god 0-60 in 9seconds
It's faster than 9 secs standard. i have had mk 1, 2, and 3. years ago. look a little dated now, but fun fun fun. light and revy. standard could do wi been a little stiffer and lower!!!
Must be me, but they both sound rubbish. Rotrex sounds like some under water submarine and the Greddy just sounds like very fast moving electric motor. I be leaving my Swift sport as it is.
Supercharger + air intake + exaust system + ECU ~152hp on the weels (according to their website). For the money of all that you could buy a new car...
@Nopiw You completely forgot to mention that it takes about 7 times as much power to drive a positive displacement supercharger as it does a turbocharger. I'm not sure about these centri-blowers, maybe only 3 times as much, so at any rate a turbo is more efficient in that regard. That being said: you're right, many superchargers have an AWFUL sound to them (Eaton) but then again nothing is as awful to listen to as that infernal "PSSH!" that every knobjob has on his turbo. Fucking wank.
@Nopiw There is a big negative with superscharger kits - they draw a lot more power from the engine to run, especially the Roots type (Greddy in this video). Of course they make this power back, but they put a lot more strain on the engine than a turbo does.
Oh and plus, turbos are more economical for cruising, which is quite important on a road car!
Superchargers can still be economical for crusing,
take the VAG 1.4 TSI it has a supercharger and a turbocharger, and the supercharger operates in the low rpm and it achieves over 45 mpg so superchargers can be friendly to the wallet as well :)
Bro, jap cars r not crap. u need to understand a good car is not about speed. Its also about Braking power, suspension, weight, aerodynamics, transmission etc etc. And its a challenge to get massive HP increase with just a small engine. Please respect, as alot of hardwork is put in.
What are u talking about? are you retarded? USA cars are crap, not good, any european car can own them and hey... the GTR is japanese, MORON! no Corvette or Mustang can beat it one on one.... pff, lots of HP, retarded asses.
my swift 1.3 is supercharged from this shop producing 160ps,its really cool car but that one is the sport so a little faster than mine. Cost about 500,000yen which is about 4600dollars
could anyone tell me how this sc kit compared to hks turbo kit? coz i still dont know which one is better.. from the performance and full consumption.
To a big rugged American like you a simple Swift with a mod would be a "piece of shit rice burner" but who has the poor mileage, large maintenance bill, heavy insurance, heavy road tax, economy that is dropping daily, oil that is over 100 dollars a barrel, middle class that is about to get wiped out, imports millions of oil barrels a day and trillions of dollars in debt to fund a war for oil?
More economical cars would have certainly helped to avoid most if not all of these problems.
i drive a mustang 71 that gets 12 to 15 miles a gallon. big v8 351c
if you people who drive rice burners. its a 5,8 not no 2.0 4 cylinder FAIL LOL
the fact the idiot people watch need for speed now go out and buy rice burners
fck them all i love mustangs! no fiber glass box. steel and america was the first ones to make cars like ford ive done my research the model t. i buy 91 the best gas ya i pay 320 a gallon idgaf top dollar who gives a shit
@iamtroyyy America has never been able to produce a good car, theyre all bad handling , fuel burning rot boxes. The only quality cars are made in Munchen..
@nespokesman fuck american cars all day man i hate those shit cars a v8 plz it could suck my dick a straight 6 can make the same or more power than a v8 there is no need
Will this modification only work on the 1.6 sport engine or is it also possible for 1.5 engine ?
neutralzonedk 1 week ago
@neutralzonedk
Our supercharger kit is designed and developed for not only ZC31 but also ZC11 and ZC21 engine.
rgds
toshimickey 1 week ago
how much is the rotrex type ?
Hunt3r8867 2 weeks ago
@Hunt3r8867
Please contact us by e-mail to trade@rsrs.jp
rgds
T. Takagi Director
toshimickey 2 weeks ago
i need 1 my email my email bashar.na@gmail.com
pls send me the price
seso1999 3 months ago
hello
good jobs
it's possible for a jimny 1.3L essence 2006 ?
thanks
theadrix38 3 months ago
@theadrix38
we are sorry that our product is designed and developed for Suzuki Swift only.
WBCvc 3 months ago
Greddy sounds better
rambo1685 3 months ago
can anyone tell me how much the price for rotrex???
shahruliverpool 6 months ago
We are very sorry we don't have any tuning parts for diesel Swift car.
WBCvc 7 months ago
hi what do u have for diesel swift ?
guywhohateslove 7 months ago
suuuuuuuuuuu zoooooo kiiiiiiii
tdotmostwanted 7 months ago
Dude still weak
merza16465 7 months ago
Rotrex have the better sound ;)
smajli25 7 months ago
nice
Theoaek21 8 months ago
nice
Theoaek21 8 months ago
I want the 1,88L engine in my Swift Sport!
The 1,6L Engine sucks! No power but burns gas like a big truck!
And the 205 tires are way to smal to get the SSS around the corners!
If you don't tune it its a car for old Women! :-P
einherjer1988 8 months ago
Here's the problem:
TURBOS produce extreme boost, but not where it's useful, but produces unwanted heat and frustrating lag... ROTREX is in a sense, a belt driven turbo (simple explanation), it doesn't have lag, but peak boost is still in the high RPM... ROOTS type blowers offer max boost at any speed, the moment you open the throttle, but at high RPM produces heat & power drops quickly...So, what's the answer???...SCREW type blowers compresses internally, and provides the best of both worlds
phoenix11994466 8 months ago
does a standerd suzuki swift sport have a turbo?
0h4yd3n0 10 months ago
@0h4yd3n0 nah it doesnt dude its just a 1.6 littre engine :)
mcb055 10 months ago
What's the sense, it's not even a whole car.
Coolride17 1 year ago
shucks the car is fast already, why make it a death trap... seriously it sounds cool Turbos for the win but no this car is fantastic with out the turbo LOL ill just get a better ECU
Mount2ion 1 year ago
how much it cost?
jh0ssimar 1 year ago
superchargers cost kw's
brazzr 1 year ago
0:19 Did I hear a Pigeon? lol
8giang8 1 year ago
Gotta love the sound of chargers. Fuk turbos
DGAF4LYFE420 1 year ago
I too believe that a sport ca MUST have at least 2L engine. I also know that performance has to do with power but has to do with weight too. A light car can turn easier than a heavy, so in twisting roads I would prefere a lightweighted car with a 2L engine.
And last thing. Here in Greece, if you own 1.9L and up, you have to pay over 1.000€ or 1400$ per year a so called "driving tax", plus the other taxes for owing a car and great taxes when buying. So small engines are one way.
larrythes 1 year ago
greddy!
rorioshi 1 year ago
Any car that is less than 2000 cc (2L) should be banned from being branded "Sport" or mentioned in same sentence with word "Performance". I have one of these, a few weeks old, and it is absolute crap ! Good for teenage girls and old ladies.
You can put 10 superchargers on it and it will still be a piece of s....
I regret selling my 3L GMH, serves me right for going for the "economy" factor :(
tvobssesed 1 year ago
@tvobssesed Japanese pull more power out of a 1.8 liter then a 3L American car,
Bomchilaka 1 year ago
@Bomchilaka If you take into account only its power output in KW, I guess you are right. But there are two more things : torque and top end speed. That can not be achieved without big engine.
And btw, my old car was GMH body with factory fitted RB30 Nissan engine. It would blow this thing off the road.
I still think that Swift and other cars of its type are just crap !
I really really hate my Swift, $20000 wasted. It's a pig !!! It just doesn't go !
At least I will thrash it well....
tvobssesed 1 year ago
@tvobssesed I see,thank you for informing me that,i was very closed minded about car information,i thought if you had alot of power it will have more top end speed,but i was wrong.
Bomchilaka 1 year ago
@Bomchilaka Simple, large engine will always accelerate easier from, for example 70kmh up than small engine. Australian police tested Subaru WRX for highway patrol use, they abandoned it in favor of Ford Falcon V8 and GMH Commodore also V8. Subaru just couldnt accelerate fast enough at speeds over 100kmh... And we always hear how WRX is very powerful when you compare kilowats. After all Bugati Veyron is the fastest car on the market is W16, 8L car...
430kmh top speed.
tvobssesed 1 year ago
@tvobssesed it also has 4 turbos so you cant really compare it to a N/A v8
jacksean 1 year ago
@jacksean Whole point of my story is : Power comes from burning fuel, period !
Laws of thermodynamics do not allow you to get something for nothing. Only thing you can influence is efficiency of the system (engine). You can burn 2L of fuel mixture and make excellent power output, or burn 5L and get miserable result. I'm sure that Suzuki 1.5L is efficient, but 1.5L for that power to weight ratio won't get you awesome speed and power. When you mention "Sport" I expect BANG Fireworks ! Tyre smoke
tvobssesed 1 year ago
@tvobssesed My MX-5 sport is defenately a sportscar. Even though it has a 1840 cc engine. A friend has a car with a 6.1L engine that I don't consider a sportscar. A sportscar is not about engine size, it's about handling, cornering and having fun driving.
Wernerrrrr 1 year ago
Thats pretty cool bro:) very nice suzuki
demigodnz 1 year ago
sry dude but you just wasted your money on a super charger
xstr33tr4cerx 1 year ago
Greddy sounds good, but the rest of the engine & gearbox can't cope with the extra BHP and warranty on the car is void. You also need a proper air filter, not that heap of junk you are using! It has a small surface area and big holes, so you are allowing big bits of dirt in to cause damage and wear to the supercharger and engine internals. A proper paper air filter with area of 13ft (compared to your 1ft) should be used to supply FILTERED air, it's not a restriction so don't mislead people!
.
urbex2007 1 year ago
suzuki your Autostake
laxapapa 1 year ago
Much Money. I`ll stick with my Supercharged Polo G40 lol.
Fred196407 1 year ago
im respect supercharge..now in malaysia, some toyota KE70 engine standart 4k put and Add supercharge SC14..nice...
shadowsharpshooter 1 year ago
Nice turning a crappy car into a even more crappy car.
muslimhunterFTW 1 year ago
@muslimhunterFTW don't judge a car if you havent driven it
komahoby 1 year ago
Rotrex 製のタービン音いいッ！！
キーッン！って感じが好きだぁ！！
AT01typeZR 1 year ago
my farts sounds more powerfull tunnel cunt!
megmegmeg21 1 year ago
When it comes to smaller cars, The United States doesn't get shit. Can you say Focus RS?
phattacorider 1 year ago
Suzuki, please bring this car to North America.
scaliose 1 year ago
It makes a lot of noise but looks slow
Silverchair84 1 year ago
HP????
Skratchyo8 1 year ago
i like it... nice sound
jiantak16 1 year ago
Yeah they are 2 different types of kits there, depends what you want,
The rotrex kit provides boost that is proportionate to engine rpms, this can be kinder to clutches and gearboxes and the drivetrain because the torque is built up gradually and it peaks at the top of the rpm range, Goofd for high revving apps.
The greddy kit provides an even spread of boost over the whole rpm range usually than less than the centrifugal type these are better on a larger engined car than don't rev that high
jarrus464 1 year ago
@jarrus464 But the elise S/c uses a positive displacement charger and that's a high revving car, so it's not quite that "cut and dry" , the charger itself in the greddy kit will most like be made by eaton and modded by greddy, rotrex make there own chargers like vortech but rotrex's are of a more compact design, which can be preferable, hell Koenigsegg use rotrex superchagers in there car, and you know how fast they are, so they must be good.....
jarrus464 1 year ago
this kit can be instaled on 1.3 version?
fxcell 1 year ago
super charger respond more efficient then a turbo charger check the sound of the engine
tornillo20003 2 years ago
If you want to know the price, it costs around 3,700 EUROS, or 5,230 US Dollars
JellyGrease 2 years ago
LOL rotrex sounds so much better =P
for an awesome silant sleeper you could put one of these on a suzuki liana1.6i ,as its the same engine{ M series}
105 bhp as standard and 144 hpt
0.60 in about 9 seconds
i realy dont know why people dont use thim in more car ??
its basicaly a honda vtec but not as revvy well not 9000 ,more like 7500
but still a very good engine =D
zacb997 2 years ago
Are you talking 60mph , 9 seconds thats slower than a standard ford or holden. Im looking a buying one of these things are they slow as snails, I know they handle ok but god 0-60 in 9seconds
BrianDewy 1 year ago
It's faster than 9 secs standard. i have had mk 1, 2, and 3. years ago. look a little dated now, but fun fun fun. light and revy. standard could do wi been a little stiffer and lower!!!
sandstau 1 year ago
@BrianDewy its 8.9 but with 16 alloys and esp off i get 0-100km in 7.5 sec stock swift sport
Djjeanresident 1 year ago
Must be me, but they both sound rubbish. Rotrex sounds like some under water submarine and the Greddy just sounds like very fast moving electric motor. I be leaving my Swift sport as it is.
e1337prodigy 2 years ago
the electric motor sound is normal... that's how superchargers sound
but yea, rotex sounds really horrible
Nopiw 2 years ago
Price please !
MrSeedification 2 years ago
i want one for my swift :)))
siabdo 2 years ago
Dios como sopla el turbo al levantar el pie del acelerador
charlyduc 2 years ago
how much is this thing cost for an sx4?
nadavdw 2 years ago
does the swift have any sort of dump valve on it???
wulliefst 2 years ago
oh the greddy sound...
do you get torque steer after putting one of those on?
valetdabess 2 years ago
if u want torque steer, better thing is to get a turbo
polak4lyf 2 years ago
of course, massive i presume.
monono954 2 years ago
toyota corolla sucks swift is the best amongst all
mpkprashant123456789 2 years ago
I'll have to disagree with what's his name over there. I think the Rotrex's surge sounds awesome.
Ralli2Yazh 2 years ago 7
how do you order a supercharger kit seriously ? I asked everywhere and they told me that they will charge me 2 times of the price for shipping it.
Moonface00z 2 years ago
Greddy's OWN!
lyordson2K 2 years ago
damn that Rotrex kit just sounds horrible with the surge
RXHardstyle 2 years ago
Hy, my Suzuki user pal wonders where can he get theese things, what does it costs, and is it compatible with his 1.3 engine (93hp)?
Thx: Me
Sanyey 2 years ago
if just bought swift sport, if i got the rotex superharcher how much power gain are we talking about exactly?
SirDodds 2 years ago
Supercharger + air intake + exaust system + ECU ~152hp on the weels (according to their website). For the money of all that you could buy a new car...
Nopiw 2 years ago 2
well said, and my stock 03 corolla has more has more than 152hp
simplejax 2 years ago
is right but a 152 bhp for a car that weight under 1400 pounds is a beast.
DASFSw 2 years ago 2
Swift Sport weighs 2270 pounds (1030kg)
Toyota Corolla TS (2003) around 2860 pounds (1300kg)
A vehicle under 1400 pounds? sounds like an F1 car...
Nopiw 2 years ago 2
yea i make a mistake i suppose to say kg not pounds.
DASFSw 2 years ago
ohh, ok then
Nopiw 2 years ago
yeh fuck i was just thinking.... swift weighing 600kgs? is it made entirely of carbon haha
kingtipz 2 years ago
my dad has an efin clubman, about 1200 pounds with 155 rearwheel horsepower and loads of torque. but that is a race car.
jcadlols 2 years ago
so is supercharging or turbo charging better for a car?
LancerVX 2 years ago
There is no "better"...it depends on what you want.
Turbocharger:
+ much additional hp in high rpms (4000+)
- turbolag
Supercharger:
+ additional power available in low AND high rpms
+ no lag
- some brands have an annoying noise
For this car I'd take a Supercharger...
the one from Greddy sounds quite good on too.
Nopiw 2 years ago 31
@Nopiw You completely forgot to mention that it takes about 7 times as much power to drive a positive displacement supercharger as it does a turbocharger. I'm not sure about these centri-blowers, maybe only 3 times as much, so at any rate a turbo is more efficient in that regard. That being said: you're right, many superchargers have an AWFUL sound to them (Eaton) but then again nothing is as awful to listen to as that infernal "PSSH!" that every knobjob has on his turbo. Fucking wank.
zapwatt 1 year ago 2
@Nopiw There is a big negative with superscharger kits - they draw a lot more power from the engine to run, especially the Roots type (Greddy in this video). Of course they make this power back, but they put a lot more strain on the engine than a turbo does.
Oh and plus, turbos are more economical for cruising, which is quite important on a road car!
munkul 1 year ago
@munkul Not all the time,
Superchargers can still be economical for crusing,
take the VAG 1.4 TSI it has a supercharger and a turbocharger, and the supercharger operates in the low rpm and it achieves over 45 mpg so superchargers can be friendly to the wallet as well :)
jarrus464 1 year ago
@Nopiw Herpa herpa if you super charge a car you don't get all the added hp like a turbo would as you lose a lot when the belt has to power it.
olah002 1 year ago
@olah002 Let me put it this way: You're subscribed to Pruane, your argument is invalid.
Nopiw 1 year ago
@Nopiw most superchargers lose power in the top end unless its a centrifugal or twinscrew design ...
somerandomaussie 1 year ago
@Nopiw Supercharger takes power from the engine = Less power on high rpms.
JiTiMusic 11 months ago
@JiTiMusic wow, you are the first person who ever came to this conclusion
Nopiw 11 months ago
@Nopiw Wow your ample, well why post that shit if your not even sure? On a small motor turbo is btr 90% of the cases I would say.
JiTiMusic 11 months ago
@JiTiMusic yea, sure dude
Nopiw 11 months ago
@Nopiw that annoying noise you refer to is the best thing ive ever heard
hitbythese 7 months ago
@hitbythese you know what the word "some" means? search it up in a dictionary
Nopiw 7 months ago
@Nopiw supercharger is more eff to install to this kind of cars....
olnvd02 5 months ago
@olnvd02 do you speak from experience? no? then go fuck yourself
Nopiw 5 months ago
@Nopiw my point of view as a mechanical engineering student puto
olnvd02 5 months ago
@olnvd02 so no experience at all fitschi... now go fuck yourself
Nopiw 5 months ago
@Nopiw teri maaaa ki choooot
go fuck ur khaalaaa in her BHOSDA
zeshanalikhan 5 months ago
I would say supercharging, cause if puts less stress on the engine. And maintenance is alot cheaper too.... and the big plus - no turbo lag!
KamsCan 2 years ago
вот . то что доктор прописал.. огонь!!
rodionrbk 2 years ago
Nice car man I think this car does not need more then 250 hp
ISR24ns 2 years ago
Bro, jap cars r not crap. u need to understand a good car is not about speed. Its also about Braking power, suspension, weight, aerodynamics, transmission etc etc. And its a challenge to get massive HP increase with just a small engine. Please respect, as alot of hardwork is put in.
Armban 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The starter on my car has more torque than that POS!
heatherandpaul2 2 years ago
What are u talking about? are you retarded? USA cars are crap, not good, any european car can own them and hey... the GTR is japanese, MORON! no Corvette or Mustang can beat it one on one.... pff, lots of HP, retarded asses.
stylnox 2 years ago 4
i dont care who u are...u cant tell me that lil guy wouldnt be a blast to drive
get your head out of your asses
dmke 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow, it sounds like a supercharged fart. How much did it boost your power? from 100 hp to 130 hp??? Thats killer. You ricers are all fags.
heatherandpaul2 2 years ago
you burgers are all fags
theeroom 2 years ago
just because u havnt got on ur just f**king jelous
cyberlink123456 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you guys need to stop going to the like shop and getting 1.3Ls of milk come one get some more power then that to play with lol
as for that little turbo and superchager kit that you have got on the car you might as well got your mothers hair dryer lol :P
binzababygirl 3 years ago
oi mopar guy..there are supercharger kits for things beyond your world of v8 9liter cars and shit you kno..wake up
Dekzta22 3 years ago 9
@Dekzta22 ...your an idiot!
nwma1830 1 year ago
where the fuck can i get some of those ?!!
nothingface1984 3 years ago 2
in d store
elvisvwvw 2 years ago
respect,thc-tuning
schnuebu 3 years ago
how the hell do you put a supercharger kit on an engine smaller than 2 literes?
KeithConcerto 3 years ago
you make one for it...simple...
mopar43v3r 3 years ago 7
be couse we can:P
ROB101Q 3 years ago 4
my swift 1.3 is supercharged from this shop producing 160ps,its really cool car but that one is the sport so a little faster than mine. Cost about 500,000yen which is about 4600dollars
swift160ps 3 years ago 3
Man I need to know if I can supercharger my 07 Jimny?? it has M13A engine with 5MT :)
can you please check it out for me?
ej254 2 years ago
I must have that greddy shit! killlerrr
s4nlol 3 years ago
the turbo sounds like a bitch! i love this car
pinello88 3 years ago
could anyone tell me how this sc kit compared to hks turbo kit? coz i still dont know which one is better.. from the performance and full consumption.
thx anyway
deriwhiteswift 3 years ago
wher can i get it
syk2111 3 years ago
I wonder if this would fit the engine in the Move as well
dctim 3 years ago
I did mean the Wagon.
dctim 3 years ago
wreos pelle m
djkakos1 3 years ago
awesome,i wanna buy this kit
devrimecz 3 years ago
ela re ktinos!!!swiftara gia panta!!!japan for ever!
nasosg13b 3 years ago
Swiftαρα ολε !!!
varsamakos 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
piece of shit riceburner
pennellamichael 3 years ago
To a big rugged American like you a simple Swift with a mod would be a "piece of shit rice burner" but who has the poor mileage, large maintenance bill, heavy insurance, heavy road tax, economy that is dropping daily, oil that is over 100 dollars a barrel, middle class that is about to get wiped out, imports millions of oil barrels a day and trillions of dollars in debt to fund a war for oil?
More economical cars would have certainly helped to avoid most if not all of these problems.
Go V8.
nespokesman 3 years ago 38
Nice answer! I totally agree with you ;)
preludePT 3 years ago 3
yu fucked his trip :D
candydude235 3 years ago 2
@nespokesman
you know i dont care about gas
i drive a mustang 71 that gets 12 to 15 miles a gallon. big v8 351c
if you people who drive rice burners. its a 5,8 not no 2.0 4 cylinder FAIL LOL
the fact the idiot people watch need for speed now go out and buy rice burners
fck them all i love mustangs! no fiber glass box. steel and america was the first ones to make cars like ford ive done my research the model t. i buy 91 the best gas ya i pay 320 a gallon idgaf top dollar who gives a shit
iamtroyyy 1 year ago
@iamtroyyy lol ford is the worst car to buy everyone knows that get a honda it's alot better
fireball420 1 year ago
@fireball420
your ignorance is what keeps people down.
Look up Ford Focus RS 2010.. The best front wheel drive sports car made.
greenrolaids 1 year ago
@iamtroyyy America has never been able to produce a good car, theyre all bad handling , fuel burning rot boxes. The only quality cars are made in Munchen..
Draxindustries1 1 year ago
@Draxindustries1
what a load of bollocks.
Paulmar2019 1 year ago
@nespokesman fuck american cars all day man i hate those shit cars a v8 plz it could suck my dick a straight 6 can make the same or more power than a v8 there is no need
xstr33tr4cerx 1 year ago
etsi etsi ta swift!
optimus21nk 3 years ago 3
I whant it! ;-)
croach06 3 years ago
so nice! I prefer Rotrex one !!
mickey14300 3 years ago 2
Quel bruit.... Trop fort....
Michel301168 3 years ago