Southend
14:51
Added: 5 months ago
From: atomburke
Views: 1,978
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • shouldnt build resisdential areas around industrial plants such as these. We need these plants for what they generate ( power ). Because for now there is no solution to our need of power that could compinsate for our coal power plants. Not solar, nor wind, can generate base load energy like a coal plant can. Nuculear plants arnt the solution either there spent rods fuel still do not have a perminent home. And they remain radioactive for 100's of years.

  • I'm not convinced that the "bowl" is the main factor for all the breathing problems in Muscatine although it probably does contribute. It's all the coal and other pollutants.

    The river bluffs make some houses at the exact elevation as the stacks, so on windy days it may blow coal soot right to your doorstep even if you don't live in Southend.

    Don't discount Iowa's imbalanced dependence on industrial agriculture as a factor either.

  • Adam, it was an exceptional short piece. The one thing I didn't see here was a discussion of the geological shape of the area with its high hills surrounding Muscatine, so the region is a kind of fishbowl, preventing the fumes from escaping, keeping them "bottled up" in this relatively small area and thus concentrating their affects. But of course, this is just a more observable example of the pollution prevalent in much of Iowa because of our imbalanced dependence on dirty coal power plants.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more