Sick morons.Why do you want to search for the oldest gospel(there never was a bible till 300 years after prophet Isa Aalih sallam(jesus)),when the word of God,the creator of the heavens and the earth is right in front of you.
The Noble Quran is the final and last testament of God Almighty.
@izri1 The Quran is only 1400 years old, which makes it useless, sadly pedo lovers like you haven't got the IQ to face it, you probarbly havent read the Q anyway, 80% of muslims can't read. You guys don't belong in a modern world, please stay home in your shitholes and fight eachother, we don't care.
Would the word of god be written on paper that would fade and blur so HIS voice couldn't be heard? Why didn't he give his word to the Native Indians of the U.S.? Oh by the way... the latest edited version came out just in time to sell this easter! Dam good timin' eh? Get'em when they feel the guiltiest. All of it is fairy tales past down and edited to profit the most for the current slang of the day.
I own a King James bible that's 200 years old than this one!-just kiddin. Did someone say the peshitta text is 200 ad, impossible. The oldest peshitta is a thousand years later. There are possibly fragments of the original peshitta dating close to 200, but certainly not earlier than the Greek Text.
It was written 400 years after the death of the man. How many adulterations occurred in those 400 years? How many more adulterations have occurred in the 1,700 years that have come to pass, since then? I no longer trust the dogmas of man. I believe in a Supreme Creator, who loves us all unconditionally. Our Creator is only of love and knows no wrath or scorn. Those are human emotions that were embedded into scripture.
True there´s about 24.000 existing surviving ancient biblical scripts. But only a few complete bibles. Oldest OT: Tanakh (450 BC), oldest found Hebrew bible Leningrad Codex (950-1008 AD. Oldest NT: NT (40-90 AD), Peshitta is oldest found NT (200 AD). Oldest complete Greek bible Codex Sinaiticus (400-450) AD. So remember our bible didn´t start with Greek translations! But with Hebrew/Armaic language!
I prayed to God in the year of 1980 to show me Oldest Bible in my dream, and I saw it in my dream having very large prints, I was amazed. Now its 2011 to my surprise the Oldest Bible that I saw looked just like the one in this video, prints and all. It goes to show you when you ask God to show you something in a dream you will not be let down. .
@3333gigi Peace, are you for real? It said THE OLDEST BIBLE IN THE WORLD, the ORIGINAL would be more exact but that perished. Just because it's the OLDEST doesn't mean it's the ORIGINAL. The Original book of Moses which is of the Bible was written in Hebrew, I hope you know that and not trying to romantize a emotional feel good scheme. Jesus pbut said himself in the NT that he followd the law, Old Testament. Greek is not the standard but Hebrew/Aramaic is !
How can a manuscript with contained so many errors, and omissions that the monks in the monastery which it was found, placed it in a waste basket as trash be the word of God? Before you attack me as a troll or liar why not just research this and then give an informed opinion.
But that's just taking one religious view into consideration. Monotheism isn't the only kind of faith in this world, and even within monotheism there are so many variants. Once you decide to believe that god(s) exists, there is still the issue of choosing which religion best approaches this god(s). That's why Pascal's wager is flawed.
Polytheism was pretty much done with ever since the beginning of the Medieval Ages. No thinking person ever so much as considered from thereon. Thus, the "Dawkinian" argument about these other gods is pure ignorance.
-
With that said, yes it is true that Pascal, as a Christian, had the Christian God in mind in his argument. That doesn't make it flawed in any way. If you want to generalize it more, the generalization will only go as far as the three Monotheistic faiths.
Hindusim still exists. And a significant portion of Chinese people still practice a mix of ancestor worship and polytheism. So, no, polytheism is not "pretty much done with". To so quickly exclude this alternative to monotheism is to oversimplify. I'm sorry, friend, but Pascal's wager is "pretty much done with".
I think it should be required that people at least have a basic understanding of theology before entering these discussions. And I didn't mean polytheism was non-existent; I mean it is no longer considered worthy of any thinking person. You see, there are certain necessary attributes for God that if God does not possess, He could not rightly be called God. This is what disqualifies the Greek and any Eastern deities from being "God."
"I think it should be required that people at least have a basic understanding of theology before entering these discussions."
Agreed. You need to go read up on your world cultures. Why should theology be dominated by monotheism? Of the middle-eastern strain to be particular. I don't see the point of quibbling over the " necessary attributes" of god when the existence of said personage is in dispute. I'm merely engaging you over the issue of Pascal's wager.
No, you were arguing about other deities being possible substitutes for Pascal's Wager. Thats why I pointed out that those alleged substitutes all fail under theological scrutiny. Please be honest enough to stick to your guns or else there's no discussion to be had.
Where was I not honest? I stated very clearly my opinion that Pascal's wager was flawed in that it did not take into account religions other than Christianity and theological views other than monotheism. I wasn't "arguing about other deities being possible substitutes for Pascal's Wager", I was stating very honestly my opinion that Pascal's wager was flawed in that it did not take into account religions other than Christianity and theological views other than monotheism.
And I told you, other religions were never considered by any civilized peoples in the days of Pascal and under theological scrutiny those deities are disqualified from being rightly considered as God or gods. The only faiths considered were Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. One can perhaps generalize the Wager to apply to the other monotheistic religions, but it doesn't stretch further than that.
You know, on second thought, it only makes sense that you, being a Christian, would prefer to limit the definition of God where the Pascal's wager is concerned. It makes it easier to defend your position on the matter of faith and god since there are less variables to contend with.
Quite a fitting response. You can't provide a rebuttal to the theological arguments presented, so you resort to presuming to tell me what are or are not my intentions and accuse me of fabricated conspiracies. For your information, I don't care too much for Pascal's Wager; I am not emotionally involved with his reasoning. It's just a matter of intellectual honesty, and the fact of the matter is that the Wager is not in any way flawed. You've yet to demonstrate otherwise.
Your "theological arguments" are merely assertions without evidence or proof. You can rationalize your faith in a multitude of ways, but the fact that you're arguing about nothing is self-evident. And as for demonstrating how Pascal's Wager is flawed: I've already done that. It's just that you've invested too much into your position to see that you are wrong.
No, not assertions. They logically follow: God, as the creator of matter, is outside of matter(and therefore immaterial or 'spirit'); as the creator of time, He is outside of time (therefore timeless/eternal); outside of space, therefore space-less (omnipresent, as theologians call it). These are necessary attributes that are not met in any other deities.
-
It is in fact your assertion that is absurd: you cannot argue about nothing for then 'nothing' would be something. Logic much?
Is every atheist's brain here broken? What if I told you this: If you go out to a certain party with your friends tonight, there's a 50% chance you'll get shot and killed. If instead you stay home, you won't have as much fun as if you went to the party, but you escape the 50% chance of getting killed. Thus, it more wise to stay home and escape the 50% chance of getting killed. Is this reasoning flawed?
It's all about FAITH, my brothers & sisters. FAITH is an unbounded realm left virtually unexplored by us all. Yes, it can move mountains (as taught by Yeshua Hamashiach; whom you call Jesus) literally. It heals, it loves, & is the conduit of the all encompassing order & power of God Creator of the heavens & earth. FAITH is realized through prayer, fasting, & meditation. It is through these things He is free to endow us with these incredible gifts for those who seek in FAITH.
Religion is something private, any religion is not for hateing another people who is not the same ! Stop hate/kill in the name of your religion ! Any religion, catholic, muslim, judaism, etc. Stop the war between religions !
So from what I can gather when reading these comments is that Jesus Spoke in Aramaic, he may also have spoken in Hebrew as the people of his surrounding areas did.
So if Jesus Spoke in Hebrew and Aramaic then how can we trust the accuracy and reliability of the Greek Translation to be the exact teachings of Jesus.
What if the Greek translations had some adaptations for political influence to benefit the people in power at the time.
Jesus spoke in a dialect of Aramaic. The first Gospel were written in Aramaic and.or Hebrew. Later, as Xitanity spread, texts were translated into Greek.
@19lfm12 How is it we dont have aramiac or hebrew parchments,only greek documents?As far as i know the hebrew message of Jesus was in the oral form and spread through oral transmission.Educated greek knowing people wrote down the early manuscripts.God knows best.
@reding321 She did have other sons with Joseph her husband, but Jesus was born while she was still a virgin. According to the Bible, Joseph did not know (become intimate with) Mary until she had brought forth her first son, and called his name Jesus.
People who believe in the sin aiticus do not believe the bible at all. The good bibles were used so much they wore out. They had to be copied over and over by hand untill the printing press came in. The Textus Receptus is correct.
@starynite7 If you don't know what you're talking about, don't wast people's time with your KJVonlyist nonsense. The Codex Sinaiticus is in such good condition because it was always treated with great respect and care by its owners from the time it was written until today. The monks of the monastery used to keep it wrapped in a red cloth. It is priceless and contains the word of God. Your disparaging comments border on blasphemy. The Textus Receptus is a late majority text.
@Keruaran Its only blasphemy if you believe in God mate. How can I say something disparaging about a deity that I don't believe exists. You can't say that this thing is "The word of God" because that is just something that someone told you as a child. Christianity is just a tragic hypocrisy that has been mistranslated so many times its not funny. What are you going to do when you find out that Jesus was a magician in a traveling show with his 12 mates??.
@Superdudemann This comment is 2 months old, and was it addressed to you? No. Why would I waste my time on yet another moron who thinks his amateur hour comment touching upon the textual criticism of Bible texts (something you're clearly ignorant of) is in any way valid?
@Superdudemann dear sir ; JESUS CHRIST IS COMING SOON !!! and he will have many magical powers!!!!,and they are real,powers!!!! so real he'll send your soul to hell for blasphemy !!! DON'T MOCK GOD AT ANY TIME!!!!!!!!!
@walter42194 LOL@ "magical powers". Dude seriously. What if he doesn't come mate, what then?. You will have gone through your entire life believing in a work of fiction. If he does come, all I have to do is repent and all is forgiven (So says the bible). I'd say the odds are stacked in my favour. Good luck though :)
@Superdudemann While what you say MAY be true; when your heart is opened back up via God's Love, you will gush with tears of love for His sacrifice He made in behalf of us. Remember that Satan has his seed in us, & so validates his claim for our souls. This is what prompted God (Creator of the heavens & earth) to rescue those who have the love of God in them) & thus He came down even IN His Son (Yeshua Hamashiach) to live in poverty & a common life; to serve & then offer Himself as sacrifice.
@Kazyman How do you start you comment with "What you say MAY be true" , and then proceed to tell me that i'm suddenly going to "opened up" to God's love. Way to completely contradict yourself. Surely you can see that I DO NOT believe in God. I would have thought that would be devastatingly obvious.
@Superdudemann Read again what you wrote, unknown friend...in the "what if" scenario, you said "all I have to do is repent and all is forgiven," so therefore you concluded that the odds are stacked in your favor, to which I said that that MAY be true. How did I contradict myself? Look mate, we have auto insurance just in case; & medical insurance just in case, etc. Why not start a dialogue with God (Creator of the heavens & earth) just in case? Great eternal insurance for free JUST IN CASE.
@KenMacMillan, You asked abou copies (set of manuscripts) Gen, Ex, Num, Deu, Lev, Judges, Job, Psal, Ruth, Dan, Sam, Micah, Zeph, Jer, Eze, Isa, Hosea, Nah, Song of Songs, Kings, Amos, Lam. almost all. If you ask about Codex (with all books) is a little different matter. Torah set of Dead Sea Scrolls are dated around 200 years BCE.
The world's oldest known copy of the complete bible (in bound book form), dating from 300-350 AD, is the Codex Sinaiticus. It is a translation from Hebrew and Greek manuscripts into an all Greek bible.
This is entirely false. The oldest bible is stored in Etchmiadzin in Armenia. That copy was translated from Syriac in the October of AD 411 by Saint Mashdotz.
Its all bullshit lol
scriminamp 1 week ago
Thank you for this video. Please see my Orthodox video promotions on youtube under marykfilms.
marykfilms 3 weeks ago
love the video man
khijasmith 1 month ago
love the video really good
shoppittsburghnow 1 month ago
very interesting video thanks
staranjela 1 month ago
Sick morons.Why do you want to search for the oldest gospel(there never was a bible till 300 years after prophet Isa Aalih sallam(jesus)),when the word of God,the creator of the heavens and the earth is right in front of you.
The Noble Quran is the final and last testament of God Almighty.
izri1 3 months ago
@izri1 The Quran is only 1400 years old, which makes it useless, sadly pedo lovers like you haven't got the IQ to face it, you probarbly havent read the Q anyway, 80% of muslims can't read. You guys don't belong in a modern world, please stay home in your shitholes and fight eachother, we don't care.
jr32142 3 months ago
@jr32142 Damn you're racist, and also very ignorant.
I'm white, and I think you should be put in a hole to die somewhere.
bijansta200 1 month ago
@bijansta200 sorry i have many black friends, i'm not a racist, just realistic you're the racist here
jr32142 1 month ago
Yet another bible surprise....surprise..
imicky 4 months ago
THE LATEST AND THE OLDEST ARE WRITTEN BY EXPERT ARISTOCRATIC CONMEN.THEY ARE NEVER THE WORD OF GOD.
THE ONLY WORD OF GOD IS IN OUR HEARTS.IF YOU DONT LISTEN.HOW CAN YOU HEAR?
awake2012nibiru 5 months ago
Would the word of god be written on paper that would fade and blur so HIS voice couldn't be heard? Why didn't he give his word to the Native Indians of the U.S.? Oh by the way... the latest edited version came out just in time to sell this easter! Dam good timin' eh? Get'em when they feel the guiltiest. All of it is fairy tales past down and edited to profit the most for the current slang of the day.
Mammothviking 6 months ago
@Mammothviking check out josh allem science of gods word
crazysillybaby1 3 months ago
Is the name of god (JHWH) in the codex sinaticus??????????
20dez1991 6 months ago
I own a King James bible that's 200 years old than this one!-just kiddin. Did someone say the peshitta text is 200 ad, impossible. The oldest peshitta is a thousand years later. There are possibly fragments of the original peshitta dating close to 200, but certainly not earlier than the Greek Text.
protochris 7 months ago
Does it still say the earth is flat and the center of the solar system? Lie about a global flood?
gregrutz 7 months ago
It was written 400 years after the death of the man. How many adulterations occurred in those 400 years? How many more adulterations have occurred in the 1,700 years that have come to pass, since then? I no longer trust the dogmas of man. I believe in a Supreme Creator, who loves us all unconditionally. Our Creator is only of love and knows no wrath or scorn. Those are human emotions that were embedded into scripture.
My God is of pure love and only love.
Wildrosestands 7 months ago
Sorry but is anyone here fluent in Greekenough to accurately translate these pages? NO? Well, I guess we are just screwed huh?
NewChristianSoldiers 7 months ago
True there´s about 24.000 existing surviving ancient biblical scripts. But only a few complete bibles. Oldest OT: Tanakh (450 BC), oldest found Hebrew bible Leningrad Codex (950-1008 AD. Oldest NT: NT (40-90 AD), Peshitta is oldest found NT (200 AD). Oldest complete Greek bible Codex Sinaiticus (400-450) AD. So remember our bible didn´t start with Greek translations! But with Hebrew/Armaic language!
royalsteven 8 months ago
I prayed to God in the year of 1980 to show me Oldest Bible in my dream, and I saw it in my dream having very large prints, I was amazed. Now its 2011 to my surprise the Oldest Bible that I saw looked just like the one in this video, prints and all. It goes to show you when you ask God to show you something in a dream you will not be let down. .
HAVE A BLESSED DAY.
Gigi
3333gigi 9 months ago
@3333gigi Peace, are you for real? It said THE OLDEST BIBLE IN THE WORLD, the ORIGINAL would be more exact but that perished. Just because it's the OLDEST doesn't mean it's the ORIGINAL. The Original book of Moses which is of the Bible was written in Hebrew, I hope you know that and not trying to romantize a emotional feel good scheme. Jesus pbut said himself in the NT that he followd the law, Old Testament. Greek is not the standard but Hebrew/Aramaic is !
rahim4411 9 months ago
How can a manuscript with contained so many errors, and omissions that the monks in the monastery which it was found, placed it in a waste basket as trash be the word of God? Before you attack me as a troll or liar why not just research this and then give an informed opinion.
AntG72 9 months ago
@Kazyman that's called Pascels wager, known to be a flawed argument. Why not believe in fairys and unicorns, just in case.
SGTRandyB 1 year ago
@SGTRandyB
-
How is Pascal's Wager flawed? It's not even an argument, by the way. He just shows that it more wise to believe in God than to reject Him.
AgApE010 1 year ago
@AgApE010
But that's just taking one religious view into consideration. Monotheism isn't the only kind of faith in this world, and even within monotheism there are so many variants. Once you decide to believe that god(s) exists, there is still the issue of choosing which religion best approaches this god(s). That's why Pascal's wager is flawed.
TADahar 1 year ago
@TADahar
-
Polytheism was pretty much done with ever since the beginning of the Medieval Ages. No thinking person ever so much as considered from thereon. Thus, the "Dawkinian" argument about these other gods is pure ignorance.
-
With that said, yes it is true that Pascal, as a Christian, had the Christian God in mind in his argument. That doesn't make it flawed in any way. If you want to generalize it more, the generalization will only go as far as the three Monotheistic faiths.
AgApE010 1 year ago
@AgApE010
Hindusim still exists. And a significant portion of Chinese people still practice a mix of ancestor worship and polytheism. So, no, polytheism is not "pretty much done with". To so quickly exclude this alternative to monotheism is to oversimplify. I'm sorry, friend, but Pascal's wager is "pretty much done with".
TADahar 1 year ago
@TADahar
-
I think it should be required that people at least have a basic understanding of theology before entering these discussions. And I didn't mean polytheism was non-existent; I mean it is no longer considered worthy of any thinking person. You see, there are certain necessary attributes for God that if God does not possess, He could not rightly be called God. This is what disqualifies the Greek and any Eastern deities from being "God."
AgApE010 1 year ago
@AgApE010
"I think it should be required that people at least have a basic understanding of theology before entering these discussions."
Agreed. You need to go read up on your world cultures. Why should theology be dominated by monotheism? Of the middle-eastern strain to be particular. I don't see the point of quibbling over the " necessary attributes" of god when the existence of said personage is in dispute. I'm merely engaging you over the issue of Pascal's wager.
TADahar 1 year ago
@TADahar
-
No, you were arguing about other deities being possible substitutes for Pascal's Wager. Thats why I pointed out that those alleged substitutes all fail under theological scrutiny. Please be honest enough to stick to your guns or else there's no discussion to be had.
AgApE010 1 year ago
@AgApE010
Where was I not honest? I stated very clearly my opinion that Pascal's wager was flawed in that it did not take into account religions other than Christianity and theological views other than monotheism. I wasn't "arguing about other deities being possible substitutes for Pascal's Wager", I was stating very honestly my opinion that Pascal's wager was flawed in that it did not take into account religions other than Christianity and theological views other than monotheism.
TADahar 1 year ago
@TADahar
-
And I told you, other religions were never considered by any civilized peoples in the days of Pascal and under theological scrutiny those deities are disqualified from being rightly considered as God or gods. The only faiths considered were Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. One can perhaps generalize the Wager to apply to the other monotheistic religions, but it doesn't stretch further than that.
AgApE010 1 year ago
@AgApE010
You know, on second thought, it only makes sense that you, being a Christian, would prefer to limit the definition of God where the Pascal's wager is concerned. It makes it easier to defend your position on the matter of faith and god since there are less variables to contend with.
TADahar 1 year ago
@TADahar
-
Quite a fitting response. You can't provide a rebuttal to the theological arguments presented, so you resort to presuming to tell me what are or are not my intentions and accuse me of fabricated conspiracies. For your information, I don't care too much for Pascal's Wager; I am not emotionally involved with his reasoning. It's just a matter of intellectual honesty, and the fact of the matter is that the Wager is not in any way flawed. You've yet to demonstrate otherwise.
AgApE010 1 year ago
@AgApE010
Your "theological arguments" are merely assertions without evidence or proof. You can rationalize your faith in a multitude of ways, but the fact that you're arguing about nothing is self-evident. And as for demonstrating how Pascal's Wager is flawed: I've already done that. It's just that you've invested too much into your position to see that you are wrong.
TADahar 1 year ago
@TADahar
-
No, not assertions. They logically follow: God, as the creator of matter, is outside of matter(and therefore immaterial or 'spirit'); as the creator of time, He is outside of time (therefore timeless/eternal); outside of space, therefore space-less (omnipresent, as theologians call it). These are necessary attributes that are not met in any other deities.
-
It is in fact your assertion that is absurd: you cannot argue about nothing for then 'nothing' would be something. Logic much?
AgApE010 1 year ago
@AgApE010 Not flawed? loool. Try Googling: pascal's wager fallacy
update.uu.se/~fbendz/nogod/pascal[dot]htm
Velox415 11 months ago
@Velox415
-
Is every atheist's brain here broken? What if I told you this: If you go out to a certain party with your friends tonight, there's a 50% chance you'll get shot and killed. If instead you stay home, you won't have as much fun as if you went to the party, but you escape the 50% chance of getting killed. Thus, it more wise to stay home and escape the 50% chance of getting killed. Is this reasoning flawed?
AgApE010 11 months ago
@Velox415
Yup, pascal will definitely save you - lulz
Suit yourself, but I'm putting my chips in the hopes of everlasting life.
SmalltimR 10 months ago
It's all about FAITH, my brothers & sisters. FAITH is an unbounded realm left virtually unexplored by us all. Yes, it can move mountains (as taught by Yeshua Hamashiach; whom you call Jesus) literally. It heals, it loves, & is the conduit of the all encompassing order & power of God Creator of the heavens & earth. FAITH is realized through prayer, fasting, & meditation. It is through these things He is free to endow us with these incredible gifts for those who seek in FAITH.
Kazyman 1 year ago
Religion is something private, any religion is not for hateing another people who is not the same ! Stop hate/kill in the name of your religion ! Any religion, catholic, muslim, judaism, etc. Stop the war between religions !
AryanPride18 1 year ago
So from what I can gather when reading these comments is that Jesus Spoke in Aramaic, he may also have spoken in Hebrew as the people of his surrounding areas did.
So if Jesus Spoke in Hebrew and Aramaic then how can we trust the accuracy and reliability of the Greek Translation to be the exact teachings of Jesus.
What if the Greek translations had some adaptations for political influence to benefit the people in power at the time.
How many times has the Bible been mistranslated??
Q187BANG 1 year ago
are the dead sea scrolls older?
dgmoocher 1 year ago
@dgmoocher The Dead Sea Scrolls - and other similar finds of texts in Palestine & Egypt - are much older; dating from the 1st century.
19lfm12 1 year ago
Why is it written in GREEk when Jesus never spoke greek, and the official language was latin????
mfrmfr05 1 year ago
@mfrmfr05 BINGO!
Jesus spoke in a dialect of Aramaic. The first Gospel were written in Aramaic and.or Hebrew. Later, as Xitanity spread, texts were translated into Greek.
19lfm12 1 year ago
@19lfm12 How is it we dont have aramiac or hebrew parchments,only greek documents?As far as i know the hebrew message of Jesus was in the oral form and spread through oral transmission.Educated greek knowing people wrote down the early manuscripts.God knows best.
mfrmfr05 1 year ago
@mfrmfr05 Once again....for the blind....Jesus spoke in a dialect of Aramaic. Shall I repeat that again?
The earliest written forms of the Gospels were in Aramaic & Hebrew. These would scribal texts found in Egypt & Palestine.
Scribal texts transcribed into Greek both came later AND were primarily intended for the Gentile world.
'God knows best'....is completely incoherent.
19lfm12 1 year ago
@19lfm12
jesus was born when Mary had sex with some guy, nothing else.
georgiadrew 1 year ago
@georgiadrew Mary is a virgin that why we call her VIRGIN MOTHER MARY she doesn't have sex with anyone else
reding321 1 year ago
@reding321 She did have other sons with Joseph her husband, but Jesus was born while she was still a virgin. According to the Bible, Joseph did not know (become intimate with) Mary until she had brought forth her first son, and called his name Jesus.
OneGodApostolic238 1 year ago
People who believe in the sin aiticus do not believe the bible at all. The good bibles were used so much they wore out. They had to be copied over and over by hand untill the printing press came in. The Textus Receptus is correct.
starynite7 1 year ago
@starynite7 If you don't know what you're talking about, don't wast people's time with your KJVonlyist nonsense. The Codex Sinaiticus is in such good condition because it was always treated with great respect and care by its owners from the time it was written until today. The monks of the monastery used to keep it wrapped in a red cloth. It is priceless and contains the word of God. Your disparaging comments border on blasphemy. The Textus Receptus is a late majority text.
Keruaran 1 year ago
@Keruaran Its only blasphemy if you believe in God mate. How can I say something disparaging about a deity that I don't believe exists. You can't say that this thing is "The word of God" because that is just something that someone told you as a child. Christianity is just a tragic hypocrisy that has been mistranslated so many times its not funny. What are you going to do when you find out that Jesus was a magician in a traveling show with his 12 mates??.
Superdudemann 1 year ago
@Superdudemann This comment is 2 months old, and was it addressed to you? No. Why would I waste my time on yet another moron who thinks his amateur hour comment touching upon the textual criticism of Bible texts (something you're clearly ignorant of) is in any way valid?
Keruaran 1 year ago
@Superdudemann dear sir ; JESUS CHRIST IS COMING SOON !!! and he will have many magical powers!!!!,and they are real,powers!!!! so real he'll send your soul to hell for blasphemy !!! DON'T MOCK GOD AT ANY TIME!!!!!!!!!
walter42194 1 year ago
@walter42194 LOL@ "magical powers". Dude seriously. What if he doesn't come mate, what then?. You will have gone through your entire life believing in a work of fiction. If he does come, all I have to do is repent and all is forgiven (So says the bible). I'd say the odds are stacked in my favour. Good luck though :)
Superdudemann 1 year ago
@Superdudemann While what you say MAY be true; when your heart is opened back up via God's Love, you will gush with tears of love for His sacrifice He made in behalf of us. Remember that Satan has his seed in us, & so validates his claim for our souls. This is what prompted God (Creator of the heavens & earth) to rescue those who have the love of God in them) & thus He came down even IN His Son (Yeshua Hamashiach) to live in poverty & a common life; to serve & then offer Himself as sacrifice.
Kazyman 1 year ago
@Kazyman How do you start you comment with "What you say MAY be true" , and then proceed to tell me that i'm suddenly going to "opened up" to God's love. Way to completely contradict yourself. Surely you can see that I DO NOT believe in God. I would have thought that would be devastatingly obvious.
Superdudemann 1 year ago
@Superdudemann Read again what you wrote, unknown friend...in the "what if" scenario, you said "all I have to do is repent and all is forgiven," so therefore you concluded that the odds are stacked in your favor, to which I said that that MAY be true. How did I contradict myself? Look mate, we have auto insurance just in case; & medical insurance just in case, etc. Why not start a dialogue with God (Creator of the heavens & earth) just in case? Great eternal insurance for free JUST IN CASE.
Kazyman 1 year ago
This is the oldest complete copy of the new testament. Anyone know what the oldest complete copy of the torah is?
KenMacMillan 2 years ago
@KenMacMillan, Dead Sea Scrolls.
timmhg 2 years ago
I don't think they are complete, & the story is a little different.
KenMacMillan 2 years ago
@KenMacMillan, You asked abou copies (set of manuscripts) Gen, Ex, Num, Deu, Lev, Judges, Job, Psal, Ruth, Dan, Sam, Micah, Zeph, Jer, Eze, Isa, Hosea, Nah, Song of Songs, Kings, Amos, Lam. almost all. If you ask about Codex (with all books) is a little different matter. Torah set of Dead Sea Scrolls are dated around 200 years BCE.
timmhg 2 years ago
the other two codex are Codex Alexandrius and Codex Vaticanus
mannyfit75 2 years ago
Not really. The video is correct.
The world's oldest known copy of the complete bible (in bound book form), dating from 300-350 AD, is the Codex Sinaiticus. It is a translation from Hebrew and Greek manuscripts into an all Greek bible.
mannyfit75 2 years ago
This is entirely false. The oldest bible is stored in Etchmiadzin in Armenia. That copy was translated from Syriac in the October of AD 411 by Saint Mashdotz.
shadmikharner 2 years ago