Gravitons are such pessimists. They always bring you down. Anyways, how do you aim something so freaking small to collide with another tiny little thing? Or do they just spin em round and around till they get something?
I would imagine that throughout the tunnel, they have a positive force (kinda like getting a positive side of a magnet to attach to another positive side, it won't) running through the walls, so that the proton is running on a road. Hope this helps, though its only my opinion on what they did instead of a fact of how they did it.
Matter particles inside the sphere of one half-wavelength region around a dense point will be drawn toward the point, and as as these particle condense on the point, matter inside a hollow sphere defined by the second half-wavelength region will be constrained to condense near a spherical surface in that region. Additional rings or density defects may form if the distribution is large enough.
Using what I'll call "cosine Newtonian gravity" I'll trace through my viewpoint on galactic evolution. I'll start with a largely homogenous or gaussian distribution of randomly moving point-masses that (for whatever reason if homogenous) generate a "center" point of relatively high density within.
I'll suppose only one "frequency" of graviton is involved, and both within and outside of one half-wavelength from the "center" of this distribution encompasses a large number of these point-masses.
The graviton wave cycle describes a phase pattern that only shifts over a change in distance from the source.
Modeling the graviton as a (very slowly) spinning disk that propagates edgewise in a stright line, we might imagine marking the edge with a dot. If we have many, and all are spinning at the same rate, then, no matter if they're tilted sideways etc, all dots will point inward at certain times (pull times), and this will alternate with times that all dots point outward (push times).
Last post should begin "The only detectable quality of gravitons that we know of is their 'pull' ..."
Instead of leaving Newton's gravitional formula GmM/(d^2) as is, I'll multiply by a cosine term with ultralong wave (cycle) length to get cos(kd)GmM/(d^2). If modeling the graviton as a spinning disc moving edgewise at around light-speed, I'd say the cosine factor may be like saying the disk can be tilted at any angle, even upside-down, as long as it's propagating edgewise.
The only detectable quantity of gravitons is their "pull" so I believe one should look for an aligned standing "push" cycle effect in ultralong quantum gravity waves existing on astronomical scales and centered about a massive object such as a galactic core. This is what Hoag's Object is showing to me.
Much as I noted before, photonic "phase" is a detectable variable quantity that goes through a complete reversal of sorts in characteristic and so in graviton phase we should expect (or hope, anyway) would involve a detectable variable quantity that also periodically reverses.
No one is apparently looking for the effects of a "coherent" massive source of steady-state astronomically-scaled "graviton" waves from an apparently stable source, is what I was trying to say. Physicists are looking for transient gravitational shock waves, not standing graviton waves.
No one apparently considered ring galaxies such as Hoag's Object to be a manifestation of coherent graviton waves.
Einstein wasn't able to see ring galaxies in any real level of detail, as we can today. He invented an anti-gravitational "cosmological constant" to counteract the capacity of gravity to rapidly collapse everything.
Photonic "phase" is a detectable variable quantity and so graviton phase we should expect would involve a detectable variable quantity.
The search for gravity waves is not a search for the graviton. Physicists searching for the graviton are searching for the particle, not the wave. The graviton's energy is too small to currently measure as a particle, which implies the wavelength is potentially of galactic scale, but no one is apparently looking for the effects of a "coherent" massive source of astronomically-scaled gravity waves.
there searching for something that does not exist
111alien111 1 day ago
Doesn't exist!
nbsbb2009 7 months ago
Mark all comments from "lethal-sub" as spam.
Thanks
buffboynick 8 months ago
@buffboynick Didn't work in this case, retard.
lethalsub 7 months ago
Sous-titrages en français, s' il vous plaît.
French subtitles, please.
technorockfraggle 1 year ago
I wonder what a graviton bomb would do? I guess make mini black holes big enough to eat cities.
argo984 1 year ago
@argo984
they are actually working on an "anti-matter bomb"
which is VERY scary and ignorant
They need to make less bombs and focus on free power sources instead
buffboynick 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buffboynick Could you stop flinging your shite across youtube, retard.
lethalsub 8 months ago
very interesting.
stybarrow 2 years ago
Comment removed
Mavericker7 1 year ago
@stybarrow Yes it is. I saw this on the Elegant Universe. Did Fermilabs ever have any success with determining if gravitons existed yet?
Mavericker7 1 year ago
Heh. One of the sound effects used for the atoms bouncing off each other is that of a Dalek gun, I noticed. Funny.
DoctorWhoNinteyFive 3 years ago
Gravitons are such pessimists. They always bring you down. Anyways, how do you aim something so freaking small to collide with another tiny little thing? Or do they just spin em round and around till they get something?
vitruvian8807 3 years ago
I would imagine that throughout the tunnel, they have a positive force (kinda like getting a positive side of a magnet to attach to another positive side, it won't) running through the walls, so that the proton is running on a road. Hope this helps, though its only my opinion on what they did instead of a fact of how they did it.
metalikarm 3 years ago
They send a bunch going one direction, and they send a bunch going in the opposite direction, so alot of them are bound for collision.
DeathByAgito 2 years ago
Matter particles inside the sphere of one half-wavelength region around a dense point will be drawn toward the point, and as as these particle condense on the point, matter inside a hollow sphere defined by the second half-wavelength region will be constrained to condense near a spherical surface in that region. Additional rings or density defects may form if the distribution is large enough.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
Using what I'll call "cosine Newtonian gravity" I'll trace through my viewpoint on galactic evolution. I'll start with a largely homogenous or gaussian distribution of randomly moving point-masses that (for whatever reason if homogenous) generate a "center" point of relatively high density within.
I'll suppose only one "frequency" of graviton is involved, and both within and outside of one half-wavelength from the "center" of this distribution encompasses a large number of these point-masses.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
The graviton wave cycle describes a phase pattern that only shifts over a change in distance from the source.
Modeling the graviton as a (very slowly) spinning disk that propagates edgewise in a stright line, we might imagine marking the edge with a dot. If we have many, and all are spinning at the same rate, then, no matter if they're tilted sideways etc, all dots will point inward at certain times (pull times), and this will alternate with times that all dots point outward (push times).
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
Last post should begin "The only detectable quality of gravitons that we know of is their 'pull' ..."
Instead of leaving Newton's gravitional formula GmM/(d^2) as is, I'll multiply by a cosine term with ultralong wave (cycle) length to get cos(kd)GmM/(d^2). If modeling the graviton as a spinning disc moving edgewise at around light-speed, I'd say the cosine factor may be like saying the disk can be tilted at any angle, even upside-down, as long as it's propagating edgewise.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
Contd.:
The only detectable quantity of gravitons is their "pull" so I believe one should look for an aligned standing "push" cycle effect in ultralong quantum gravity waves existing on astronomical scales and centered about a massive object such as a galactic core. This is what Hoag's Object is showing to me.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
Much as I noted before, photonic "phase" is a detectable variable quantity that goes through a complete reversal of sorts in characteristic and so in graviton phase we should expect (or hope, anyway) would involve a detectable variable quantity that also periodically reverses.
The only detectable quantity
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
No one is apparently looking for the effects of a "coherent" massive source of steady-state astronomically-scaled "graviton" waves from an apparently stable source, is what I was trying to say. Physicists are looking for transient gravitational shock waves, not standing graviton waves.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
More thoughts:
No one apparently considered ring galaxies such as Hoag's Object to be a manifestation of coherent graviton waves.
Einstein wasn't able to see ring galaxies in any real level of detail, as we can today. He invented an anti-gravitational "cosmological constant" to counteract the capacity of gravity to rapidly collapse everything.
Photonic "phase" is a detectable variable quantity and so graviton phase we should expect would involve a detectable variable quantity.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
Random thoughts:
The search for gravity waves is not a search for the graviton. Physicists searching for the graviton are searching for the particle, not the wave. The graviton's energy is too small to currently measure as a particle, which implies the wavelength is potentially of galactic scale, but no one is apparently looking for the effects of a "coherent" massive source of astronomically-scaled gravity waves.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
Maria is kinda hot.
madtiger111 3 years ago
Yeah, forget the physics and do some biology! :-D
Ciderman2007 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I can explain gravity with out drawing force. With out bending space.
I can explain old light redshifting with out expanding space. I can explain galaxies twirling with out dark matter.
I can told how atoms nucleus energy expanding all a time.
You cant told how space expanding. I think that space dont expanding at all. I think there is no extra dimension at all.
Old time people believe stardome and you believe extradimension. Lets forget extra dimensions!
Etimespace 3 years ago