OK. But how do you explain the free fall of Building 7 in 6.5 seconds into its own footprint? Eh?
The real issue is the cover-up. NIST and FEMA say the "collapse" was solely due to "office fires". The "Official Commission" report didn't even bother to comment on Building 7.
Doesn't this bother you?
Why do people continually defend a government that clearly doesn't give a shit about them?
@ictvvictoria I inform that puppet is not! I´m not is ignorant to technical facts happened in the 9/11. The documentation generated by the happened swept all of the engineering universities. Here only who agree with you´re the ones that has hate to the empire yankee and they are for Iran, Cuba, venezuela, Korea of the north and other. The one that I know took 2 hours with 1 lecture on Metallic Structures. And in the audience he had some like you. they were massacred by the Teacher's arguments
@ictvvictoria against the such conspiracy. And him nor close to NY it was, therefore the Engineering is Universal. Now as I´ll type him here what do I know? I would be hours and hours! ! Do you have hate of the bush? me also! he invaded Iraq removing troops of Afghanistan without permission of UN. Only to avenge the father and to steal the oil. Giving breath to Al Qaeda and talibã. Only lack you he to say that they didn't deserve to wash candy!
@ictvvictoria Excuse the delay. Engineers have to work. As it is impossible here to type what know on the towers and WTC7, I indicate engineering sites. I only get to post that site. The others are obstructed. type in the google that you will find. Not only him as well as several engineering sites on the 9/11. It has even at my country. nobody knows them that it helps such conspiracy: debunking911
We can all argue about fine and rough details -- and proffer detailed or undetailed analysis of the physics of that fateful day -- but we suggest the focus should also include the "facts" of the "Official Story" via FEMA, The 9/11 Commission and NIST -- all of whom purport that "office fires" were responsible. The option of controlled demolition was utterly and virtually left out of the collapse hypothesis. Most important, WTC 7 was NOT hit by an aircraft or substantial debris from WTC 1 & 2.
RG2057, how can the vacuum be created by the fire in the basement of a building 200meters away from the fire? i believe alot of windows were open to let the air in and let the smoke out of the towers so the vacuum would have been filled.
this man strikes me as very inteligent and has no reason to make this up.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
Why won’t Dr. Steven Jones release the “rigorous non-critical” peer review comments offered by David L. Griscom regarding his nanothermite paper?
How much nanothermite did Niels Harrit estimate was used in the supposed controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, & 7?
@ctcole77 What does that prove?? Why no pentagon plane? Why no mention of WTC7 in commission? Bandana-please!!!!?>????? Thermite? And maybe 100 other questions. Why cant we hear the cockpit tames for 93? Why cant we see the garage footgae for pentagon? No way in the world, did the towers just collapse. Come on....don't be simple
"Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane.....an American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass & it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
@ctcole77 other eye witnesses say that the plane appeared as if it were landing, and came in slow. he claimed tuihat he saw the plane for a total of 10 seconds and that was at the gas station and anex building.
"Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane. An American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass & it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
"Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane. An American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass & it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
I believe the official version is that the fire in the twin towers sucked in the air in the towers and, as a result, a vacuum developed at the base and underground under each towers.
Therefore, in addition to intense temperature that softened the structure, a net force of air pressure was acting to fill this vacuum. The towers did not just fall by gravity, their were also sucked in by their own base.
I can say i have 100% CERTAINTY that the building was brought down by SATAN, and since no one can prove me wrong (prove me satan himself didn't open earth to let the building fall, then shut it off afterwards. Just prove me wrong!
I know the government lies, I know Bush was a fucking asshole. I know regular Media is often biased. BUT this "professor" here is talking some bullshit also. the twin towers didn't collapse due to office fire, that is really a demented statement. Also you can't state that "there's no doubt that this building was taken down in a controlled demolition". Yes THERE IS DOUBT. I'm not saying it couldn't have been, but saying IT WAS FOR SURE is just as idiotic as anything else.
well, he never heard of this before because his Tv was off!!! everyone watching the live broadcasting that day knew the fucking building was going down.
They got away with it. Get over it. The American public are a bunch of cowards.
ThePeoplesuk 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThePeoplesuk
FAKE THERMITE!
That's right, Dr. LIARS Harrit FAKED his thermite paper.
911 TRUTH = LIARS Harrit payday
ctcole77 1 month ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 4 months ago
@aczjbr
OK. But how do you explain the free fall of Building 7 in 6.5 seconds into its own footprint? Eh?
The real issue is the cover-up. NIST and FEMA say the "collapse" was solely due to "office fires". The "Official Commission" report didn't even bother to comment on Building 7.
Doesn't this bother you?
Why do people continually defend a government that clearly doesn't give a shit about them?
Can you say "paid shills???"
ictvvictoria 4 months ago
@ictvvictoria I inform that puppet is not! I´m not is ignorant to technical facts happened in the 9/11. The documentation generated by the happened swept all of the engineering universities. Here only who agree with you´re the ones that has hate to the empire yankee and they are for Iran, Cuba, venezuela, Korea of the north and other. The one that I know took 2 hours with 1 lecture on Metallic Structures. And in the audience he had some like you. they were massacred by the Teacher's arguments
aczjbr 4 months ago
@ictvvictoria against the such conspiracy. And him nor close to NY it was, therefore the Engineering is Universal. Now as I´ll type him here what do I know? I would be hours and hours! ! Do you have hate of the bush? me also! he invaded Iraq removing troops of Afghanistan without permission of UN. Only to avenge the father and to steal the oil. Giving breath to Al Qaeda and talibã. Only lack you he to say that they didn't deserve to wash candy!
aczjbr 4 months ago
@ictvvictoria Excuse the delay. Engineers have to work. As it is impossible here to type what know on the towers and WTC7, I indicate engineering sites. I only get to post that site. The others are obstructed. type in the google that you will find. Not only him as well as several engineering sites on the 9/11. It has even at my country. nobody knows them that it helps such conspiracy: debunking911
aczjbr 4 months ago
@ictvvictoria That is another that I got post. he/she grieves that here doesn't accept the links;
tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112.html
aczjbr 4 months ago
love the intro soundtrack
Seigu007 7 months ago
You are a good man Dr Niel Harrit...thank you for these excellent interview.
PURELOVECREW 7 months ago 9
We can all argue about fine and rough details -- and proffer detailed or undetailed analysis of the physics of that fateful day -- but we suggest the focus should also include the "facts" of the "Official Story" via FEMA, The 9/11 Commission and NIST -- all of whom purport that "office fires" were responsible. The option of controlled demolition was utterly and virtually left out of the collapse hypothesis. Most important, WTC 7 was NOT hit by an aircraft or substantial debris from WTC 1 & 2.
ictvvictoria 8 months ago
RG2057, how can the vacuum be created by the fire in the basement of a building 200meters away from the fire? i believe alot of windows were open to let the air in and let the smoke out of the towers so the vacuum would have been filled.
this man strikes me as very inteligent and has no reason to make this up.
Mykhaiylo 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"how do you explain 2000C molten metal found 3 weeks after the callapse under all 3 towers?"
EASY GULLIBLE SHEEP!
MOLTEN ALUMINUM! 911 twoofers have been unable to prove it was metal.
Nice try LIAR!
Mykhaiylo DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 8 months ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
Why won’t Dr. Steven Jones release the “rigorous non-critical” peer review comments offered by David L. Griscom regarding his nanothermite paper?
How much nanothermite did Niels Harrit estimate was used in the supposed controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, & 7?
ctcole77 8 months ago
@ctcole77 What does that prove?? Why no pentagon plane? Why no mention of WTC7 in commission? Bandana-please!!!!?>????? Thermite? And maybe 100 other questions. Why cant we hear the cockpit tames for 93? Why cant we see the garage footgae for pentagon? No way in the world, did the towers just collapse. Come on....don't be simple
cockywatchman1976 5 months ago
@cockywatchman1976
"Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane.....an American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass & it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 5 months ago
@ctcole77 other eye witnesses say that the plane appeared as if it were landing, and came in slow. he claimed tuihat he saw the plane for a total of 10 seconds and that was at the gas station and anex building.
gordonculp 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cockywatchman1976
"Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane. An American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass & it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cockywatchman1976
"Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane. An American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass & it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 5 months ago
RG2057, how do you explain 2000C molten metal found 3 weeks after the callapse under all 3 towers?
Mykhaiylo 8 months ago
I believe the official version is that the fire in the twin towers sucked in the air in the towers and, as a result, a vacuum developed at the base and underground under each towers.
Therefore, in addition to intense temperature that softened the structure, a net force of air pressure was acting to fill this vacuum. The towers did not just fall by gravity, their were also sucked in by their own base.
RG2057 8 months ago
@RG2057 thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard. honestly.
1buckdawg 8 months ago 2
@RG2057 yeah right!!!!!!!!!!!!! Shut up. Why was steel imbedded in WTC3....it had to fly off at a velocity so high, only an explosion could do that.
cockywatchman1976 5 months ago
I can say i have 100% CERTAINTY that the building was brought down by SATAN, and since no one can prove me wrong (prove me satan himself didn't open earth to let the building fall, then shut it off afterwards. Just prove me wrong!
WilliamAztech 8 months ago
I know the government lies, I know Bush was a fucking asshole. I know regular Media is often biased. BUT this "professor" here is talking some bullshit also. the twin towers didn't collapse due to office fire, that is really a demented statement. Also you can't state that "there's no doubt that this building was taken down in a controlled demolition". Yes THERE IS DOUBT. I'm not saying it couldn't have been, but saying IT WAS FOR SURE is just as idiotic as anything else.
WilliamAztech 8 months ago
well, he never heard of this before because his Tv was off!!! everyone watching the live broadcasting that day knew the fucking building was going down.
WilliamAztech 8 months ago
Spot On!
FINALLY THE TRUTH IS OUT PEOPLE....
FINALLY PEOPLE KNOW THE LEVEL OF CORRUPTION IN THE WORLD GOVERNEMENTS.....
WE NEED TO ALL FINALLY WAKE UP!
TechnoKid79 11 months ago
Yes, you've gotta be in serious denial if you believe WTC7 fell due to burning debris and structural damage, the thing went down like a concertina!
misterbonzai08 11 months ago