The Time Is Nigh For The Bankers-Les Visible

[variezn34gm]

2012 = REVELATION 20.12 and justice for them = GENESIS 4.11 in accordance with the REVELATION 4. 2-11 crew. AND BTW ... REVELATION 4.11 and REVELATION 22.21.

[variezn34gm]

I suggest REVELATION 4.11 is going to HANG GENESIS 4.11 and you are being watched.

[LooksAeterna]

To the rest: this troll using the nick "violetta3333" - lacking arguments - has systematically and arbitrarily deleted parts of the arguments. My last reply, for instance contained "Contd." 3 and 4 and contain the clearest debunking analogy to what the troll was trying to purvey. I suggest you move to the "all comments" page and click on the contributions falsely marked as "spam".

[HorChild]

White people are the problem!! 

Your average jane and joe - we gave them, the Rulers, the power by not fighting evil - because it didn't apply to us!! When there is a Threat to Justice anywhere there is a threat to justice everywhere!!!! We must always be vigilant of the lie and liar!!! Fight EVIL and Love Truth!!

[TheMatteigenauer]

The bankers buy out the politicians, and we fire the politicians once they take away our funding! Rothschild said "give me control of a nations money and I care not who makes the laws"

[mypix2tv]

Who did the voice over? Just to know. It sounds amazing.

[violetta3333]

I think the bankers are not the root of the problem - if yo dig deeper - it is the politicians and the government

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 Now IF you WOULD dig deeper then look here: If the fat ugly assholes wouldn't get sex for exploitation, they wouldn't have any reason to do it.

Most important literature of our times:

warrenfarrell. org/ TheBook/

and also look for "Manipulated Man" by Esther Vilar

Remove spaces and happy reading !

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna ?? "sex for exploitation"

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 Yes, of course. These ugly men getappetitzing sex ONLY because they - directly or more often indirectly PAY for sex, and they can do that ONLY (in excess of their not so ugly competition) because they make unproportional profits which is synonymous with exploitation.

Read the literature I recommended before you send me another thoughtless question mark, please.

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna Maybe you should read more than just a couple of books before you think that you know everything and before you are rude by accusing me of being thoughtless. There is a lot more to world's problems than just them getting sex for exploitation :))))) Just looking at how many times you've used the word 'sex' in the comments suggests that maybe you haven't been getting much lately.:))))) PS I am not reading any more of your crap

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna and sorry for ruining your believe that you are well educated dude, But the references you gave are not the most important literature of our times :))

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 There is nothing someone like you could ruin for me. I also believe that your words - and avalanche of empty, insulting rhetoric with zero arguments - do more than I ever could to expose you.

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 (contd.) And the other thing, of course, is: these assholes you complain about. What is the problem with them ? It is simply - as your total lack of any conscience and decency shows - that they are people like you, except they have a bit more power. You deserve them.

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna I already said to you I am not reading any more of your crap

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 You already did, you continually self-contradicting, feces-language dependent, falsely insinuating, wrongly-into-your-vis-a-vis-op­inion-impositioning uneducated Cass Sunstein minion.

I am not writing for a hopless case such as you anyway - I am making sure the others see your probably professional mud slinging for what it is so that adolescents won't be swayed into accepting this utterly demented idea that the paid for actors called politicians might be the true authors of policy.

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna Leave me alone. And nobody is going to read your stuff anyway because as soon as people see insulting rude words, they don't bother reading the rest, there is just so much else to read on the internet. Now you know. And I never said that politicians might be the true authors of policy - you misunderstood me. Now, please, learn to be a little bit more patient, and leave me alone

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 "Leave me alone."

bwaha, as if I were after you ! But I will not leave your barbaric nonsense unchallenged (which is probably what you meant here). It's easy to stop your being bashed by me: just fulfil your promise by not reading what i write.

"I never said that politicians might be the true authors of policy"

What ??? Well, given that thinking doesn't seem to be your specialty, you might actually believe this. But here's are your original words: (to be contd.)

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 (contd.) ...your original words:

"the bankers are not the root of the problem - if you dig deeper - it is the politicians and the government"

For anyone who CAN think, this makes only sense if politicians WOULD have power to set policy that this is their only job. Obviously it matters not whether you used the exact words of my comment, but your exact words imply this idiotic assumption.

Your whole diatribe is as brilliant as accusing a puppet of a bad script. Please shut up.

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna No, what I meant by it is that the very fact that the politicians and the government exist is the bigger problem.(Sorry, I should have mentioned that I am an anarchist.) Fundamentally the state is a corrupt system that lets bankers and corporations to do what they do and will always do because there is always going to be bad people that are attracted to the government like to a magnet. When there will be no government, these bankers will simply not able to do what they do....

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 "No, what I meant by it is that the very fact that the politicians and the government exist is the bigger problem."

You just don't get it: that a politician exists can only be a problem if he sets policy ! Therefore, your claim that his existence is a problem COGENTLY implies that the politician is NOT a puppet, and that is positively idiotic to claim.

I don't give a damn if you think you are an anarchist, because you simply can't think staight !

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna I my god! What happened in your childhood that made you so emotionally imature. For the third time: poticians dont set policies, they enable those who set policies. That his existence is a problem never implies that he is not a puppet - his IS a puppet and it would be better to do without these puppets, becuase we still need bankers, but we don't need this puppets. You keep twisting what i say, and you keep implying things in you head and making up stuff about what I said....

[LooksAeterna]

@violetta3333 "This conversation is over"

I wish, and you promised that before - in vain.

"I my god!"

That says a lot about you and fits right in with your previous behavior, especially in light of your rogue pop-pyschology: "What happened in your childhood that made you so emotionally imature."

which is of course just another playform of your insulting and uneducated conduct. Now to the subject matter (contd.)

[LooksAeterna]

(contd 1) @violetta3333 "That his existence is a problem never implies that he is not a puppet"

Sure it does because the mere existence of puppets is no problem. Who cares if there is a puppet if they are ignored by everyone ? Part of the problem is the power to present the liars as if they were setting policy. And this power is not with the puppet, it is - obviously - DEEPER. And that happens to be the unholy coalition between sex and power...

[LooksAeterna]

(contd. 2) @violetta3333 ... a millennia old deal between attractive women and ugly, ruthless men, the latest playform of which is financial capitalism.

The state should be there to protect us from such ruthess power, but a sensible person cannot blame the state for what happens because it was undermined, i.e. de facto abolished, by far more primitive forces.

"poticians [sic !] dont set policies, they enable those who set policies."

Bwhaa, as if they had any power to enable anything ! ...

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna ...I think you are pretending to misunderstand me because you've realised that you jumped into conclusion about what i ment to say at the beginning. This conversation is over, obviously you have some personal issues to resolve first, I warned you to stop insulting me but you just can't help yourself. I am guessing one of your parents or both used to call you an idiot/unintelligent/stupid a lot, because you seem to use these words a lot. Take a chill pill, and learn to relax. Bye

[violetta3333]

@LooksAeterna ...E.g. The Federal Reserve is a big problem, but it is just a symptom/effect of a bigger problem - the state. We need bankers and companies for the economy to do their jobs. You can read the comments I wrote to other user if you want more details. Now, and I mean it this time, I am not going to debate with you any further unless you stop being insulting to me.

[PeaceOverPride]

@violetta3333 What if the bankers, politicians, government (including all workers), police, CPS/Human Services, greedy entrepreneurs and employees willing to please them for a job (which includes most of us in one way shape or form)feed this system.... The bankers are only a glorified mirror image of society in general.... Could it be that our own greed and jealousy causes us to envy them? Do we not continue to feed them for fear of not eating ourselves?

[violetta3333]

@PeaceOverPride That's an interesting point about the jealosy part, but it has nothing to do with the point i made. My point was that i don't think that the bankers are the root of all evil like this video states (they are evil, but not the root of all evil). Governments and politicians are closer to the root, and wouldn't be for the politicians, the bankers woulndn't be able to do all the evil - they would be doing what they are supposed to do instead.

[love4ourhumans]

Bankers and Corporations give money to the lobbies who in turn make "contributions" to the representatives who are supposed to "Represent US". Who's to blame? It's bout money & Power. This includes companies that are buying our seeds to then generically altering our seeds, our foods... We need to learn about our money system (The Federal Reserve 1913) and about our food system (organic farming-check Generically Modified Organisms) There's so much to it then just bankers... Educate yourselves!!!

[violetta3333]

@love4ourhumans Thank you for the advice to educate myself, I just hope you weren't rude to me by trying to be smart or arrogant. I am familiar with the FR 1913 Act and the organic farming (I don't know why people like to presume that I've never heard about the Act) You ask: who's to blame? I blame the government for being there in the first place. If there was no government, there would be no lobbing, and the bankers and corpor.s wouldn't able to do their evil but instead do their jobs

[love4ourhumans]

@violetta3333

Hey violetta,

No, it was not directed to you. I don't think I click on "reply" but instead just typed a comment. However, I had been saying "Educate yourselves" every since I realize that some people just love to argue for the sake of arguing and not taking into consideration that is actually enough information out there with real facts. It's a habit now.

[violetta3333]

@love4ourhumans ...The repsentatives are never ever going to "represent us", they are supposed to according to their theories, but they are never going to, it's an illusion, because their system is corrupt by definition and everything else about them. Bankers and corporations are always going to take advantage of this corruption as long as they are given the chance. If there would be no government, they would't have the chance, and we do need bankers and good companies for economic growth.

[love4ourhumans]

@violetta3333

I agree with you there! Though , IMO, the "system" is not the problem. IMO, the "people" within that system are the problem. Have you seen the 60 minutes video about Jack Abramoff: The lobbyist's playbook??? Check it out. it is disgusting and will make anyone sick about how he "bought" representatives. I can't post a link here though.

[violetta3333]

@love4ourhumans I checked out the 60min video - very interesting. It is unbelievably common what he did. There will always be lobbyists and corrupt congress men like in the video, most of them are and will be like that.

[variezn34gm]

HI from AZ: Very well done! LUKE 17.21