He's such an actor. Its funny cause ive been listening to more classical music lately in the past year and i always wonder how i knew a good amount of songs. probably from bugs bunny.
All Bach's music must be played in a Harpsichord, in piano is too "juicy", Bach never know piano and in his head this is what He wanna hear. Besides, piano es too easy for composers, all sounds good! Harpsichord demand more copmposition talent.
@aarkerio Bach's concept for sound was beyond the sounds of the instruments at that time. There are many proofs of this. He himself wanted to further improve the harpsichord's sound.
That's what they were like in the 70s... these "revival" harpsichords were basically plucked pianos, horrendous bulky things with industrial-strength string tension and iron frames. Awful when plucked, raspy tin gutter sound. Nowadays there are makers who actually build harpsichords in the old baroque style that sound a lot lighter and smoother like they are supposed to. Glenn Gould did the best he could with this thing, but even Gould can't make elephants dance like ballerinas.
Glenn Gould was mechanic, technical, all of that, but that doesn't mean he didn't put his true feelings into it. Those are his true feelings. He was obsessive. He was a nut. You can't expect some flowy romantic waltz out of him. That's not going to happen. He didn't even like that stuff. He hated it. I think his playing is beautiful and reflect his personality wonderfully. That's all you can. If you want perfection, find something played by a computer.
Gould? Or Gumby. Obviously, Gumby had not just more talent but talent itself. How can anybody with functioning ears and in their supposed right minds give this creep a second listen? Guess that they also prefer off key singing and finger nails dragged across a blackboard. YUK!
I have no "beef" with Gould. He's dead. I DO have a beef with people who wish to perpetuate the myth that he was some sort of ultimate interpreter of Bach's music.
So, according to Gould's fanatic fans, the NUTTIER you are the greater genius???
Guess that would put Charley Manson in that category too, although he doesn't play an instrument. Then again, neither did Gould when you come right down to it. This guy was a mental case with delusions of being something "great" and he had one helluva TERIFFIC agent out there hawking him.
Charles Manson plays the guitar dipshit. Look him the fuck up. And in fact, before you ever talk again, why don't you read something that wasn't cranked out of your own asshole. Good night. ;D
Asperger's is an interesting idea, but does not explain Gould's intense emotional connection to the music he played. The man is quite simply a genius. His oddities are completely beside the point.
@rosinlr I would recommend you read the book: Genius Within: The Inner Life of Glenn Gould and watch the documentary film by the same name. I own both and have learned things about Gould that were not available until recently. I don't believe it is just the oddities such as wearing gloves and a heavy coat and hat in hot summer weather and humming while playing that people refer to when they suggest he may have Asperger's syndrome. It was how he lived his entire life that suggests it.
So beautiful and haunting. I love F# minor anyway. such a genius Bach and Glenn are. Triple fugue, amazing that he could play this, just amazing. It is almost overwhelming when the 3rd fugue theme comes in . Bach and Gould, such true geniuses the planet has produced ever.
the harpsichord truly is a wonderful instrument. don't get me wrong, i love the piano, but something about it just makes my insides glow when i hear it sing the well tempered clavier.
@BlackIsOut So far, no one has replied to your query. I can't answer it, but I wonder how difficult it would be to find a harpsichord. If you are in a large cosmopolitan city, you might possibly find one. Other challenges would be to get find a teacher for this rare instrument and to obtain the use of a harpsichord to practice daily.
@gianm73yout you're right, i've just found it on the web... =) but prehaps the pedals are 5.. anyway a very intresting instrument.. I have at home a fiamming one von Gerog Zahl..
@PerfekteWagnerianer yes, but it is a "revival" harpsichord... a historical copy like yours is better for sure.
Please take a look at the Neupert website: they sell both original and revival instruments. Very intersting. There is also the legendary "Bach's harpsichord" model ... nothing to do with the "real" Bach's harpsichord. I do not know if this "revival" harpsichords are still used for baroque concertos and recordings.
@gianm73yout you're right, i've just found it on the web... =) but prehaps the pedals are 5.. anyway a very intresting instrument.. I have at home a fiamming one von Gerog Zahl, 2 manuals, without pedals.....
@joehero4 Don't be:D. Are his movements exaggerated? You are entitled to your oppinion. You might also be right, but to believe they are totally superflous is very naive.
Well, the fugue is about twice the speed I take it. Thinking of the Passion symbols present in the musical rhetoric of the fugue, I would think that a slower tempo would be more fitting. However, at this tempo, the piece takes a whole different form; it is rather more academic, and rather less beautiful, but still fascinating. Sound quality and tempo aside, we are still hearing Bach that actually sounds like Bach (which one rarely hears in this age of retouching masterpieces).
It's not bad at all... Of course that's not a real harpsichord (that sounds incrediply great) but the problem is that wood sound you can hear! The man is obviously a pianist, since the force he puts on his fingers is enough to play the piano, but when playing the harpsichord force doesn't matter at all. You can just touch your fingers and play the same as by playing piano-style; the only diffirence is that annoying sound... (I think somebody said that also before) However, good effort Gould!
It´s seems to be a Neupert "modernized" harpsichord... the action is very easy to control and the performance is made easier....the wood noise you hear are due
to the player´s "pianistic" force on keyboard and plectra. This instrument sounds
so bad... and confused people start to attack the harpsichord music...
@gabrielRAMONE "a person who says Glenn Gould's Bach performances are worse than someone else's, is" (only) jealous. When the genius it' flying up there, mediocreses and jelouses can only to shoot him.
@robertgift that's how you play a harpsichord, the keys are very different to touch (kinda crunchy), you have to play with almost feather like gentleness...given that gould is a pianist and not a harpsichordist he compensates his heavy fingers and wrists, result of the different feel keys have in the piano, by straightening his fingers and lifting his wrists as such. hope this clarifies things.
Nobody knows for sure. This recording sounds like equal temperament to me (I may be wrong). It may have been intended for equal temperament, but a few different just intonations are also candidates.
@assa123assa123 : I'm not a nut about historical authenticity and all of that, but this is a terrible sounding instrument (as an harpsichord)... you should listen - if you haven't already - to a "real" harpsichord (a good copy or a reconstructed instrument), and you'll realize that the instrument Gould is using is nothing but a caricature of the real thing.
You know even though Glenn's performances are not my favorite, They are fantastic. I can't stand the clavecin he is playing but he has a heart of Crystal for Bach!
@nykaza1 I hope you referring to this specific harpsichord as ugly and not harpsichord in general. This specific harpsichord is a nontraditional instrument with steel strings rather than nylon. In addition, Glenn Gould doesn't play with harpsichord technique, as he is a pianist.
I recommend listening to real harpsichords played by harpsichordists before your diss this old instrument. I suggest this recording of a Couperin Unmeasured Prelude. Played historically accurate on a real harpsichord
I've been searching all over the damn internet and I can't find a person who plays this with as much thought and foot tapping beat as Glenn. By the end I'm banging my head and stomping my feet like I'm at a rock concert.
I am amazed that Gould would obsess his entire life for the perfect piano, but when he decided to use a harpsichord - it seemed that he paid no attention whatsoever to the sound or quality of the instrument in question(?) I prefer his Bach on the piano, to be honest....still, his genius is unquestionable.
This isnt a historically accurate harpsichord. It's one of the clunky "revival" ones made in the 60's that use high-tension piano wires and pedals. More recently harpsichord makers like Frank Hubbard and Gerald Self produced instruments that are actually based on the more delicate, precision historical ones, they sound MUCH better than this (that's not a criticism of Glenn Gould's playing, only the rather crude instrument that was available to him at that time).
@tallswede68 You're joking right? He died in 1982. Before you potentially bring it up, he had no jewish ancestry, but often made jokes about it because of his original family name of Gold, which his parents changes to Gould due to peoples assumptions.
It´s seems to be a Neupert "modernized" harpsichord... the action is very easy to control and the performance is made easier....the wood noise you hear are due
to the player´s "pianistic" force on keyboard and plectra. This instrument sounds
so bad that people not acquainted witth the "historic instruments" start to attack or make jokes with the harpsichord and it´s music...
True.... real historically accurate harpsichords sound way better than this thing. Have a lot more feeling in their sound too. One reason is that these 1960s "revival" harpsichords were essentially plucked pianos. They used very heavy wire under super-high tension like a piano. Real harpsichords use much thinner wire and not wound so tightly, hence there is more vibration and it doesn't sound so "plunky".
Perhaps it'd be better if you didn't bother to listen to what Gould was trying to say and how he's saying it. Why not send him a few bucks and have it fixed so your delicate ears will not be assaulted.
The Harpsichord is actually a new instrument at the time of recording . Quite possibly the combination of close miking and Gould's Piano technique (the jack's are striking the jackrail quite violently) give the impression of the Harpsichord's "dire need of" repair.
Gould always tried new approaches. He was no harpsichordist - although better than some ;-) a better instrument would have worked better, though. This one has a terrible sound...
Hello. I remember you as someone whose comments stand out as particularly astute.
When you say "He was no harpsichordist" do you mean in terms of technique or aesthetic sensibility? Is it simply that he doesn't fully succeed in adjusting to the action of the harpsichord, or that, more abstractly and elusively, he just lacks the right "touch"?
What is it exactly that most prevents proficiency on the one instrument from translating directly to the other?
@gabrielRAMONE "a person who says Glenn Gould's Bach performances are worse than someone else's, is" (only) jealous. When the genius it' flying up there, mediocreses and jelouses can only to shoot him.
Muchas gracias por compartirlo.
sirjuandabicho 4 weeks ago
Harpsichord lovers are squirming at this hideous sounding instrument....
bersa888 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He's such an actor. Its funny cause ive been listening to more classical music lately in the past year and i always wonder how i knew a good amount of songs. probably from bugs bunny.
RAREpicture 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi,i am looking for a fugue speciallist to tell me what is that chromatic fugue:
youtube.com/watch?v=yotypIIavlQ&list=HL1326399726&feature=mh_lolz
I found it as notes and then i made it with a music notation program
Enlightenment82 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my version of Bach's Prelude in C for piano.
Comments and subscriptions welcome.
Just click my link to hear my channel.
markymark251 1 month ago
It was missing one jack in this harpsichord...
PKamargo 2 months ago
Ja hier spielst du sehr gut beinahe wie meil Karl - I meine richter . fine JSB Leipzig zur Zeit im Grabe :(
Mrababab121212 3 months ago
Gorgeous
musicizzzzzzzzzzzzzz 3 months ago
thank you glen for letting me appreciate the harpsichord
Gorbukoki 3 months ago
All Bach's music must be played in a Harpsichord, in piano is too "juicy", Bach never know piano and in his head this is what He wanna hear. Besides, piano es too easy for composers, all sounds good! Harpsichord demand more copmposition talent.
aarkerio 4 months ago
@aarkerio Odd that you'd be watching Glenn Gould then. He must be the devil incarnate for you.
goingfortheone1 3 months ago
@aarkerio Bach's concept for sound was beyond the sounds of the instruments at that time. There are many proofs of this. He himself wanted to further improve the harpsichord's sound.
NimbleTurtle13 3 months ago
J'aime la musique classique.
kanunisultanhan 4 months ago
Genius !!
kohisiyo 4 months ago 2
The harpshishot might be dead but glenn gould is still alive
crispijnvansas 4 months ago
harpsichords sounds always like castlevania
chochosymphony 5 months ago
Wish he wasn't humming with it! It's sooo offf!
tman8077 5 months ago
@tman8077
I always wonder why he did that. He had perfect pitch, and even if he hadn't, he still could have hummed in tune... guess we'll never know
ciliaspippi 4 months ago
Even if it's a bad instrument I love hearing these ones on harpsichord, especially with the two tiers of keys and sounds.
plunkza 5 months ago
God, I love that Fugue!!
TwelfthRoot2 6 months ago
THe guy before this guy pissed me off
vorrifmn 6 months ago 16
@vorrifmn that's the same guy -.-
dwayne515 5 months ago
This is a terrible harpsichord... Nightmarish concoction.
Drakopulous 7 months ago
@Drakopulous
That's what they were like in the 70s... these "revival" harpsichords were basically plucked pianos, horrendous bulky things with industrial-strength string tension and iron frames. Awful when plucked, raspy tin gutter sound. Nowadays there are makers who actually build harpsichords in the old baroque style that sound a lot lighter and smoother like they are supposed to. Glenn Gould did the best he could with this thing, but even Gould can't make elephants dance like ballerinas.
susumu07 7 months ago
my thoughts of this video
whats this? a harpsichord?. what.. ow! my ears!
SSvolksgrenadier 7 months ago
I just cried watching this video
murilolovizotto 7 months ago
I really don't like the sound of this instrument. Is it only me?
lip333 7 months ago
@lip333 you're not alone, it gives me a headache
keishadelacerna 7 months ago
Glenn Gould was mechanic, technical, all of that, but that doesn't mean he didn't put his true feelings into it. Those are his true feelings. He was obsessive. He was a nut. You can't expect some flowy romantic waltz out of him. That's not going to happen. He didn't even like that stuff. He hated it. I think his playing is beautiful and reflect his personality wonderfully. That's all you can. If you want perfection, find something played by a computer.
fissionesque 8 months ago
Comment removed
fissionesque 8 months ago
Gould? Or Gumby. Obviously, Gumby had not just more talent but talent itself. How can anybody with functioning ears and in their supposed right minds give this creep a second listen? Guess that they also prefer off key singing and finger nails dragged across a blackboard. YUK!
NorbertZF 8 months ago
@NorbertZF
lol joke?
freshhh1994 8 months ago
@NorbertZF What is your beef with Gould?
beatlesmack9 8 months ago
@beatlesmack9
I have no "beef" with Gould. He's dead. I DO have a beef with people who wish to perpetuate the myth that he was some sort of ultimate interpreter of Bach's music.
NorbertZF 8 months ago
@NorbertZF vagina brain
BasileusR 4 months ago
So, according to Gould's fanatic fans, the NUTTIER you are the greater genius???
Guess that would put Charley Manson in that category too, although he doesn't play an instrument. Then again, neither did Gould when you come right down to it. This guy was a mental case with delusions of being something "great" and he had one helluva TERIFFIC agent out there hawking him.
NorbertZF 8 months ago
@NorbertZF
Hey idiot:
Charles Manson plays the guitar dipshit. Look him the fuck up. And in fact, before you ever talk again, why don't you read something that wasn't cranked out of your own asshole. Good night. ;D
MeowMixerable 8 months ago
Let me very clear - I am an admirer of Glenn Gould and own many of his recordings and have read many books and watched many films about him.
mmcrosbie 9 months ago
what a master
pyrosardukar 9 months ago
Asperger's is an interesting idea, but does not explain Gould's intense emotional connection to the music he played. The man is quite simply a genius. His oddities are completely beside the point.
rosinlr 10 months ago
@rosinlr I would recommend you read the book: Genius Within: The Inner Life of Glenn Gould and watch the documentary film by the same name. I own both and have learned things about Gould that were not available until recently. I don't believe it is just the oddities such as wearing gloves and a heavy coat and hat in hot summer weather and humming while playing that people refer to when they suggest he may have Asperger's syndrome. It was how he lived his entire life that suggests it.
mmcrosbie 9 months ago
So beautiful and haunting. I love F# minor anyway. such a genius Bach and Glenn are. Triple fugue, amazing that he could play this, just amazing. It is almost overwhelming when the 3rd fugue theme comes in . Bach and Gould, such true geniuses the planet has produced ever.
trevjr 10 months ago 2
@trevjr I couldn't add to yours. You said it all. Bach, born 1685, Gould 1932. I should like to think the two men have conversed in the afterlife.
Loejyrrab 10 months ago
It's official. I've watched this video more than any other. Probably 20-30 times
kduffy760 10 months ago 2
the harpsichord truly is a wonderful instrument. don't get me wrong, i love the piano, but something about it just makes my insides glow when i hear it sing the well tempered clavier.
yumeybaconcutout 11 months ago
prefer this so much more to Book I
TheLivingHeiromartyr 11 months ago
lol 0 00 died.
by the way, i want to play harpsichord is it more difficult thet piano? and how do the keys feel?
BlackIsOut 11 months ago
@BlackIsOut So far, no one has replied to your query. I can't answer it, but I wonder how difficult it would be to find a harpsichord. If you are in a large cosmopolitan city, you might possibly find one. Other challenges would be to get find a teacher for this rare instrument and to obtain the use of a harpsichord to practice daily.
mmcrosbie 9 months ago
I believe this was Greta Kraus' Wittmayer double manual. Who has it today, I wonder?
studentjohn36 11 months ago
@studentjohn36 : I hope no one does... ;-)
bersa888 11 months ago
what kind of cembalo is this, with 5 pedals?
PerfekteWagnerianer 1 year ago
@PerfekteWagnerianer it should be a whittmayer with six pedals... but I'm not sure
gianm73yout 1 year ago
@gianm73yout you're right, i've just found it on the web... =) but prehaps the pedals are 5.. anyway a very intresting instrument.. I have at home a fiamming one von Gerog Zahl..
PerfekteWagnerianer 1 year ago
@PerfekteWagnerianer yes, but it is a "revival" harpsichord... a historical copy like yours is better for sure.
Please take a look at the Neupert website: they sell both original and revival instruments. Very intersting. There is also the legendary "Bach's harpsichord" model ... nothing to do with the "real" Bach's harpsichord. I do not know if this "revival" harpsichords are still used for baroque concertos and recordings.
gianm73yout 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gianm73yout you're right, i've just found it on the web... =) but prehaps the pedals are 5.. anyway a very intresting instrument.. I have at home a fiamming one von Gerog Zahl, 2 manuals, without pedals.....
PerfekteWagnerianer 1 year ago
se vende este video????
bromerboy 1 year ago
The first two second forces me to laugh! :D
I don't even know, why need those funny moves, and mimicry. He won't better with those... But more ridiculous! :D
joehero4 1 year ago
@joehero4 When you watch a movie do you laugh cry or express any other feelings?
Ianthe22 1 year ago
@Ianthe22 I don't. But i think it's tooooooooo exaggerating!
joehero4 1 year ago
@joehero4 So you mean to tell me you don't ever express any of your feelings?
Ianthe22 1 year ago
@Ianthe22 Bah... Sorry... Nevermind that so...
joehero4 1 year ago
@joehero4 Don't be:D. Are his movements exaggerated? You are entitled to your oppinion. You might also be right, but to believe they are totally superflous is very naive.
Ianthe22 1 year ago
Well, the fugue is about twice the speed I take it. Thinking of the Passion symbols present in the musical rhetoric of the fugue, I would think that a slower tempo would be more fitting. However, at this tempo, the piece takes a whole different form; it is rather more academic, and rather less beautiful, but still fascinating. Sound quality and tempo aside, we are still hearing Bach that actually sounds like Bach (which one rarely hears in this age of retouching masterpieces).
thonyus 1 year ago
It's not bad at all... Of course that's not a real harpsichord (that sounds incrediply great) but the problem is that wood sound you can hear! The man is obviously a pianist, since the force he puts on his fingers is enough to play the piano, but when playing the harpsichord force doesn't matter at all. You can just touch your fingers and play the same as by playing piano-style; the only diffirence is that annoying sound... (I think somebody said that also before) However, good effort Gould!
pmchsaini 1 year ago
It´s seems to be a Neupert "modernized" harpsichord... the action is very easy to control and the performance is made easier....the wood noise you hear are due
to the player´s "pianistic" force on keyboard and plectra. This instrument sounds
so bad... and confused people start to attack the harpsichord music...
harpsinth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gabrielRAMONE "a person who says Glenn Gould's Bach performances are worse than someone else's, is" (only) jealous. When the genius it' flying up there, mediocreses and jelouses can only to shoot him.
alemile656 1 year ago
Comment removed
alemile656 1 year ago
Oh my god the progression 5:10 is perfect!
MrIgorzaumm 1 year ago
@MrIgorzaumm all is perfect
FabioThePianist 1 year ago
Although he looks like he's about to have a seizure during part of his performance because he is so into his playing, this is absolutely amazing!
missprincess909 1 year ago
What's with the lifting and straightening of the fingers?
Funny that he sings parts.
Unfortunately I often whistle very high pitch as though I am supplying a mixture rank on an organ.
robertgift 1 year ago
@robertgift that's how you play a harpsichord, the keys are very different to touch (kinda crunchy), you have to play with almost feather like gentleness...given that gould is a pianist and not a harpsichordist he compensates his heavy fingers and wrists, result of the different feel keys have in the piano, by straightening his fingers and lifting his wrists as such. hope this clarifies things.
orangekush3 7 months ago
Love that Gould moment at 2:30, There's a magnificent choral effect. His singing makes it.... jubilant!
paulchiuk 1 year ago
lol best intro ever...
JacobRudduck 1 year ago
@JacobRudduck lol yeah!
pinkfloyddwc 1 year ago
so is this similar to the tuning that bach would've used?
buzzflydunbother 1 year ago
@buzzflydunbother
Nobody knows for sure. This recording sounds like equal temperament to me (I may be wrong). It may have been intended for equal temperament, but a few different just intonations are also candidates.
Envergure 1 year ago
Glenn is great. The fugue is a triple fugue.
trevjr 1 year ago
I think Glenn Gould Is In love with Bach..... :P
gitersaras 1 year ago
@gitersaras who does not? :D
magor665 1 year ago
i find it AMAZING that glenn gould has such refined skills on the piano and clavier. they are really two different skill sets.
jrblockquote 1 year ago
cage your que
artboy76 1 year ago
Comment removed
IpsaPaphum 1 year ago
This fugue is epic ^^
ereko25 1 year ago
I don't choose to listen to this kind of music that often, but watching him play that instrument is pretty epic :D
chexg 1 year ago
I love how this instrument sounds. Especially that clicking sound that it makes when he plays the trill :-)
LongDriveChamp03 1 year ago
Look at him! He loves that shit! What passion! THUMBS UP!!! ^__^
ILikeToShred 1 year ago
Comment removed
lro5 1 year ago
somehow this is the most amazing harpsichord sound I've heard
and that's Gould of course
assa123assa123 1 year ago
@assa123assa123 : I'm not a nut about historical authenticity and all of that, but this is a terrible sounding instrument (as an harpsichord)... you should listen - if you haven't already - to a "real" harpsichord (a good copy or a reconstructed instrument), and you'll realize that the instrument Gould is using is nothing but a caricature of the real thing.
bersa888 11 months ago
Genial!!!
nairigrigorian 1 year ago
You know even though Glenn's performances are not my favorite, They are fantastic. I can't stand the clavecin he is playing but he has a heart of Crystal for Bach!
Bachlives2 1 year ago
@Bachlives2 Agreed!
OrganoAeternam 1 year ago
Drug addicts are always the best musicians.
Joshology21 1 year ago
sorry but Glenn Gould/Bach on a cembalo is like Michael Schumacher on a kids tricycle (even if this music was originally written for cembalo)...
str3123 1 year ago
@str3123 hmmm...comparing musical composition and performance to f1 racing is like comparing brain surgery to band-aid application...
nykaza1 1 year ago
...having said that, i agree...both of their talents are wasted on this ugly sounding instrument...it sounds... pretentious...
nykaza1 1 year ago
@nykaza1 I hope you referring to this specific harpsichord as ugly and not harpsichord in general. This specific harpsichord is a nontraditional instrument with steel strings rather than nylon. In addition, Glenn Gould doesn't play with harpsichord technique, as he is a pianist.
I recommend listening to real harpsichords played by harpsichordists before your diss this old instrument. I suggest this recording of a Couperin Unmeasured Prelude. Played historically accurate on a real harpsichord
zyxonian 1 year ago
@zyxonian Post a link please,
thanks
bill76169 1 year ago
@nykaza1 damn it. I couldn't send it.
zyxonian 1 year ago
@nykaza1 I sent it in a personal message.
zyxonian 1 year ago
I could careless that he is a strange man. His musicianship is first class.
Huffinearts 1 year ago
musical drug...
humpert 1 year ago
I've been searching all over the damn internet and I can't find a person who plays this with as much thought and foot tapping beat as Glenn. By the end I'm banging my head and stomping my feet like I'm at a rock concert.
savemyplaylist 1 year ago 4
@savemyplaylist Great comment! No one has Gould's timing.
KABRIS1 1 year ago
no!
musicaltra 1 year ago
@musicaltra Yes!
NorrisChuckling 1 year ago
incredible!
kennethwilliams31894 1 year ago
Shit.
incasmaya 1 year ago
Amen ohlordbaby.
phantomeagle 1 year ago
I am amazed that Gould would obsess his entire life for the perfect piano, but when he decided to use a harpsichord - it seemed that he paid no attention whatsoever to the sound or quality of the instrument in question(?) I prefer his Bach on the piano, to be honest....still, his genius is unquestionable.
LaDivinaAriell 1 year ago
Love the intro chord on the piano haha
fakeaccount8455hr 1 year ago
genius.
aomarlargo 1 year ago
genius.
aomarlargo 1 year ago
如果你不會分部
看這個就有概念了
life12172001 1 year ago
Bach was so well-tempered.
mindovermattjr 1 year ago
This isnt a historically accurate harpsichord. It's one of the clunky "revival" ones made in the 60's that use high-tension piano wires and pedals. More recently harpsichord makers like Frank Hubbard and Gerald Self produced instruments that are actually based on the more delicate, precision historical ones, they sound MUCH better than this (that's not a criticism of Glenn Gould's playing, only the rather crude instrument that was available to him at that time).
susumu07 1 year ago
Such daring play.. so skilled and so much feeling for the music.
Ianthe22 1 year ago
Despite the historical accuracy of a harpsichord, I really prefer to hear Gould's Bach on a Steinway.
I dig the 70s vibe of this studio set. :)
todds7 1 year ago
Ten stars!
KABRIS1 1 year ago
why don't they put a sixth star for rating? I would use it!!
vivaweiss 2 years ago 9
@vivaweiss Seven stars, maybe eight? A constellation?
lsb6785 1 year ago
no debiera cortar el ligado de las notas y sobretodo canturrear. Su asiento es demasiado bajo
jewish1972 2 years ago
This fellow seems to be an expert at the keyboard. Does anyone know if he's offering lessons?
tallswede68 2 years ago 3
@tallswede68 You're joking right? He died in 1982. Before you potentially bring it up, he had no jewish ancestry, but often made jokes about it because of his original family name of Gold, which his parents changes to Gould due to peoples assumptions.
SANPH 2 years ago 2
I never had any suspicions that he was Jewish, but thanks for the information.
tallswede68 2 years ago
Interesting use of the word "suspicions." Explain.
Jitpring 2 years ago
Interesting use of the word "interesting". Explain.
tallswede68 2 years ago
Glenn Gould is descended Norwegian of Scottish descent. His maternal grandfather was a cousin of Norwegian composer Edvard Grieg.
Renshen1957 2 years ago
@tallswede68 You're joking, right?
nobody123r 2 years ago
Yes, I'm joking. You know it.
tallswede68 2 years ago
Nobody laughed.
AlsatianCousin 1 year ago
@AlsatianCousin
How could you know such a thing?
tallswede68 1 year ago
he's dead
VinnyTN 2 years ago
Sorry to break the news to you, he's dead...
Mozartology 2 years ago
Was it Beecham who said that a harpsichord sounds like two skeletons copulating on a tin roof?
rwocmo 2 years ago 9
lol'd hard
Yoshi5020 2 years ago
Sir Thomas didn't like J S Bach either.
"Too much counterpoint; what is worse,
Protestant counterpoint."
GRRRRRRR!
Renshen1957 2 years ago
@rwocmo
It´s seems to be a Neupert "modernized" harpsichord... the action is very easy to control and the performance is made easier....the wood noise you hear are due
to the player´s "pianistic" force on keyboard and plectra. This instrument sounds
so bad that people not acquainted witth the "historic instruments" start to attack or make jokes with the harpsichord and it´s music...
harpsinth 1 year ago
@harpsinth
True.... real historically accurate harpsichords sound way better than this thing. Have a lot more feeling in their sound too. One reason is that these 1960s "revival" harpsichords were essentially plucked pianos. They used very heavy wire under super-high tension like a piano. Real harpsichords use much thinner wire and not wound so tightly, hence there is more vibration and it doesn't sound so "plunky".
susumu07 1 year ago
This harpsichord sounds quite old and in dire need of retuning/repair. If he had used a better instrument, I think the songs would sound better.
SilversTears 2 years ago
Perhaps it'd be better if you didn't bother to listen to what Gould was trying to say and how he's saying it. Why not send him a few bucks and have it fixed so your delicate ears will not be assaulted.
yt033059 2 years ago
The Harpsichord is actually a new instrument at the time of recording . Quite possibly the combination of close miking and Gould's Piano technique (the jack's are striking the jackrail quite violently) give the impression of the Harpsichord's "dire need of" repair.
Renshen1957 2 years ago
3 i think?!
Sashomei 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WAY too fast. This is a funeral dirge and he plays it a breakneck speed. But he's glenn gould and can do no wrong, right?
organman52 2 years ago
Near the end how many voices are there?
Theonedue 2 years ago
@Theonedue
either three or four
fagottist 2 years ago
Three. I play the same peice.
AsturiasGuitar 2 years ago
Bach definitely sounds better on a harpsichord since the volume levels of all the voices are equal...
talonboy5432 2 years ago
this is awsome lol his singing =P
ragtimest 2 years ago
Gould always tried new approaches. He was no harpsichordist - although better than some ;-) a better instrument would have worked better, though. This one has a terrible sound...
bersa888 2 years ago 2
@bersa888
Hello. I remember you as someone whose comments stand out as particularly astute.
When you say "He was no harpsichordist" do you mean in terms of technique or aesthetic sensibility? Is it simply that he doesn't fully succeed in adjusting to the action of the harpsichord, or that, more abstractly and elusively, he just lacks the right "touch"?
What is it exactly that most prevents proficiency on the one instrument from translating directly to the other?
polymath7 1 year ago
a person who says Glenn Gould's Bach performances are worse than someone else's, is mentally retarded.
gabrielRAMONE 2 years ago 66
thats not a smart comment
Stehnz 2 years ago
16 thumbs up for me =)
gabrielRAMONE 2 years ago
@gabrielRAMONE yes, you are right. thanks for pointing that out.
123coolmik 1 year ago
Comment removed
alemile656 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gabrielRAMONE "a person who says Glenn Gould's Bach performances are worse than someone else's, is" (only) jealous. When the genius it' flying up there, mediocreses and jelouses can only to shoot him.
alemile656 1 year ago
This video is just so amazing, Glenn Gould was a God amongst piano/harpsichord players.
Just a small notion/question,
The first 3:40 is the Prelude
And from there on its the Fugue right?
From 3:40 till the end is pure ecstasy.
Oh and btw, what is that b&w clip the first few seconds?
Necromundi 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why the fuck he needs to do that retarded face
lightmyfire90 2 years ago
He's fucking Glenn Gould. He can make whatever fucking face he wants and you'll damn well enjoy it.
ohlordbabyjesus 2 years ago 72
This has been flagged as spam show
i dont care who he is
lightmyfire90 2 years ago
I see,,,
barrigudo00 2 years ago
good for you
lightmyfire90 2 years ago
Well you fucking should. He's like the Chuck Norris of piano players.
ohlordbabyjesus 2 years ago 7
ah......... no i dont
lightmyfire90 2 years ago
well then you shall incur his wrath.
ohlordbabyjesus 2 years ago
mmm.....
lightmyfire90 2 years ago
Comment removed
pincmin 2 years ago
The internet labels you ingorant
AndreasLuna 2 years ago
ahhh really dont care
lightmyfire90 2 years ago
@ohlordbabyjesus unlike our dear friend Mr.Lang Lang, who makes many different faces and we do not enjoy any of them.
Terrdemarzielle 1 year ago 2