The problem that results from the having too much choice of jam is because of the problem of scarcity. Scarcity of jam, time, energy, etc Scarcity denotes a lack of choice. If there is a scarcity of something such as time, energy, then clearly you have less choice. So to rephrase what I said earlier, the problem of having too much choice of jam STEMS FROM HAVING AN OVERALL LACK OF CHOICE IN GENERAL.
The problem is NOT that there was too much jam(too much choice). The problem is organization, scarcity, and the time it takes to search for the particular jam that you want. Obviously, if all the choices of jam were
The problem that results from the having too much choice of jam is because of the problem of scarcity. Scarcity of jam, time, energy, etc Scarcity denotes a lack of choice. If there is a scarcity of something such as time, energy, then clearly you have less choice. So to rephrase what I said earlier, the problem of having too much choice of jam STEMS FROM HAVING AN OVERALL LACK OF CHOICE IN GENERAL.
DaveDoggOwns 1 year ago
4:44, again she's confusing the inefficiency in the apparatus that supplies choice with inefficiency of more choices per se.
DaveDoggOwns 1 year ago
The problem is NOT that there was too much jam(too much choice). The problem is organization, scarcity, and the time it takes to search for the particular jam that you want. Obviously, if all the choices of jam were
a)orgnaized well
b)were not scarce
c)took little time to actually find
then more choice is not debilitating.
DaveDoggOwns 1 year ago