@GoodOldAnime You are absolutely right. Apparently some teachers and authors of textbooks do not know what deductive reasoning is. They are teaching their misconceptions to students, who make Youtube videos. Inductive reasoning may be shown to be correct, but that does not make it deductive reasoning.
after a certain number of occurrunces.....based on a persons tolerance or mental awareness.....they will be expecting to be hit by the third or fourth day perhaps, and will no longer scream.....(you have successfully displayed DEDUCTIVE reasoning, but not successfully used deductive reasoning to predict an outcome......which it is used for)
awsome, i really needed this for eng1020, now im gonna think about you guys when i recall the definition of inductive and deductive reasoning. Thank You!
ok. thx every1 for watching. but seriously. we came to the conclusion that someone would get mad based on previous observations. and it just so happened to be correct. so it IS DEDUCTIVE reasoning
thx for actaully explaining inductivej/inductive reasoning well some other videos just fail and dont teach you clearly but the last example was inductive
Now, we can't be a hundred percent certain, but there's atleast a 50% chance that the scraped knee and hands came from the victim being pushed over. Why was he pushed over? MAYBE because he got angry at the potato-thrower, and started to shout, insult or even attack him. Now, from this, if the scraped-knee and hands WAS from the potato incident. I can QUITE safely say tha indeed, the victim got angry from getting a potato thrown at him. - read from 3rd continuous post.
This could be an indication that the potato-thrower pushed or knocked the victim onto his knees, though this cannot be confirmed, yet. You then see that his palm's skin is also slightly scraped. Unless he's emo, or it happened from another incident, he tried to stop his fall by placing his hands infront of his body. Now, we can't be a hundred percent certain, but there's atleast a 50% chance that the scraped knee and hands - continue from the one above.
kinguana1 is actually right. Seeing as though you *built* up a reason " somehow " that someone would get mad when a potato had been thrown at them. Though there was no actual deduction in it. A deduction would be something like :
If you witnessed a potato being thrown at someone, but then you walk away. The next day, you see the victim of the thrown potato. You see that his pants/knees are slightly scraped. This could be an indication that the potato-thrower - continue from the one above.
they weren't potatoes, they looked more like tennis balls so I suspect your reasoning is unfounded.
If you had chosen to use potatoes instead your research may well have had some legitimacy, but you chose to lie... fail!
In my experience it is normally Arabs who choose to lie, I wonder what that might mean?
Occamed 3 months ago
arent they both deductive reasoning??
jeezywifey14 5 months ago
@GoodOldAnime You are absolutely right. Apparently some teachers and authors of textbooks do not know what deductive reasoning is. They are teaching their misconceptions to students, who make Youtube videos. Inductive reasoning may be shown to be correct, but that does not make it deductive reasoning.
MrErasmusbdragon 5 months ago
after a certain number of occurrunces.....based on a persons tolerance or mental awareness.....they will be expecting to be hit by the third or fourth day perhaps, and will no longer scream.....(you have successfully displayed DEDUCTIVE reasoning, but not successfully used deductive reasoning to predict an outcome......which it is used for)
peney14 6 months ago
I LIKE THE GENIUS IN YOU ALL
kathespo 10 months ago
awsome, i really needed this for eng1020, now im gonna think about you guys when i recall the definition of inductive and deductive reasoning. Thank You!
MrElmoussa 1 year ago
ok. thx every1 for watching. but seriously. we came to the conclusion that someone would get mad based on previous observations. and it just so happened to be correct. so it IS DEDUCTIVE reasoning
caitlinathena 1 year ago
thx for actaully explaining inductivej/inductive reasoning well some other videos just fail and dont teach you clearly but the last example was inductive
Lickerice 1 year ago
WERE*
say that*
rucay 1 year ago
Now, we can't be a hundred percent certain, but there's atleast a 50% chance that the scraped knee and hands came from the victim being pushed over. Why was he pushed over? MAYBE because he got angry at the potato-thrower, and started to shout, insult or even attack him. Now, from this, if the scraped-knee and hands WAS from the potato incident. I can QUITE safely say tha indeed, the victim got angry from getting a potato thrown at him. - read from 3rd continuous post.
rucay 1 year ago
This could be an indication that the potato-thrower pushed or knocked the victim onto his knees, though this cannot be confirmed, yet. You then see that his palm's skin is also slightly scraped. Unless he's emo, or it happened from another incident, he tried to stop his fall by placing his hands infront of his body. Now, we can't be a hundred percent certain, but there's atleast a 50% chance that the scraped knee and hands - continue from the one above.
rucay 1 year ago
kinguana1 is actually right. Seeing as though you *built* up a reason " somehow " that someone would get mad when a potato had been thrown at them. Though there was no actual deduction in it. A deduction would be something like :
If you witnessed a potato being thrown at someone, but then you walk away. The next day, you see the victim of the thrown potato. You see that his pants/knees are slightly scraped. This could be an indication that the potato-thrower - continue from the one above.
rucay 1 year ago