Meyer's argument is specious, a scientific theory doesn't have to be a GUT to be valid.
Abiogenesis is a seperate theory that Darwin didn't address. That he speculated about it in a letter does not make it part of his theory of natural selection.
Also, even though the sentence analogy is misrepresented. New words are added and developed all the time. FYI Qwerty would have been considered to be a random jumble in english before typewriters were developed, as would wiki before wikipedia.
Meyer's argument is specious, a scientific theory doesn't have to be a GUT to be valid.
Abiogenesis is a seperate theory that Darwin didn't address. That he speculated about it in a letter does not make it part of his theory of natural selection.
Also, even though the sentence analogy is misrepresented. New words are added and developed all the time. FYI Qwerty would have been considered to be a random jumble in english before typewriters were developed, as would wiki before wikipedia.
massivereader 3 years ago