"It was a holographic image, projected into the sky"?
or...
"It was a tomahawk missile smashing into the tower ... i hope you record that because later when everyone says it was a plane me and my fellow New Yorkers wont mention a missile anymore because we all agreed on that for no apparent reason."
Good heavens you no-planers are stupid... so f.. uhhh.. goddamn it hurts.. your stupidity is unbearable...
"People will STILL say this witness was a government plant."
He doesn't need to be a plant you fool. He never described what he saw, he vaguely mentions a "jet". From his position, he only had a split second to see what struck the WTC. He was simply mistaken.
HUH!!?? What about the many many thousands of us new yorkers who watched this live? And much better views than this man? certainly once the North Tower had been struck, everyone's eyes were in the towers. Commercial aircraft definitely plowed into wtc 1&2, and the entire lower west side of Manhattan and surrounding neighborhoods (Chelsea, Soho, West Village, Wall St, etc ALL had ringside seats! We would all have to be suffering from some mass delusion for what you say to be true..
@winston2015 Mass delusion is a common thing these days, unfortunately. However, I am still not convinced that the planes were identifiable as 'commercial.' There are too many conflicting statements, and the videos produced are all 'conveniently' blurry/hazy/out of focus. I'm more convinced that those aircraft were not commercial - same or similar type planes as 767's - but not commercial airliners. Too many other elements exist: ATC clues, flight technology in use, and pre-planned legislation.
His lips are not saying "A jet"...
Fakers911 8 months ago
@Fakers911
Uh-hu... so what does his lips say?
"It was a holographic image, projected into the sky"?
or...
"It was a tomahawk missile smashing into the tower ... i hope you record that because later when everyone says it was a plane me and my fellow New Yorkers wont mention a missile anymore because we all agreed on that for no apparent reason."
Good heavens you no-planers are stupid... so f.. uhhh.. goddamn it hurts.. your stupidity is unbearable...
palasta 1 month ago
inside job, death to israel
adibeh 2 years ago
Also, he could simply be reiterating conjecture. Chances are, this fellow didn't see shit.
ImyManz99 2 years ago
"People will STILL say this witness was a government plant."
He doesn't need to be a plant you fool. He never described what he saw, he vaguely mentions a "jet". From his position, he only had a split second to see what struck the WTC. He was simply mistaken.
No 767s struck the WTC, period.
ImyManz99 2 years ago
@ImyManz99
HUH!!?? What about the many many thousands of us new yorkers who watched this live? And much better views than this man? certainly once the North Tower had been struck, everyone's eyes were in the towers. Commercial aircraft definitely plowed into wtc 1&2, and the entire lower west side of Manhattan and surrounding neighborhoods (Chelsea, Soho, West Village, Wall St, etc ALL had ringside seats! We would all have to be suffering from some mass delusion for what you say to be true..
winston2015 1 year ago 5
@winston2015 Mass delusion is a common thing these days, unfortunately. However, I am still not convinced that the planes were identifiable as 'commercial.' There are too many conflicting statements, and the videos produced are all 'conveniently' blurry/hazy/out of focus. I'm more convinced that those aircraft were not commercial - same or similar type planes as 767's - but not commercial airliners. Too many other elements exist: ATC clues, flight technology in use, and pre-planned legislation.
milackk7 10 months ago
Standing in front of West Bway Famous Deli on W Broadway, between Murray and Warren streets.
YougeneDebs 3 years ago
ha! I saw 2 jets !!!!
merged 3 years ago