Over-the-Shoulder Strapping for Foreskin Restoration

[TLCTugger]

@yorivdood - ^^ this technique could probably fix my slight phimosis for good ^^

We have a new superior approach to phimosis resolution. send me an email or PM.

-Ron

[Sparisi1122]

Wow, gotta hand it to the foreskin restoration streatching guys. Lotta dedication and hard work. I'm glad now that the only thing the doctors cut off of me was my umbilical cord. Foreskin is there obviously by no accident, why cut it off?

[UniteForgetLeftRight]

this is a joke right? if not damn people are trying to grow that shit back? glad my parents had sense enough to leave my dick alone

[TLCTugger]

If only it was all a joke or bad dream.

Hundreds of thousands of men are enduring a multi-year process of non-surgical forskin restoration to undo some of the damage of circumcision.

[TLCTugger]

Numb scrotum sounds potentially serious to me.  I wouldn't ignore that. Start by eliminating tension and just wearing the device. Still numb? If not, the tension was excessive.

If you ARE still numb, then you should ask someone like a doctor what he/she thinks of the numbness.

Of course you would only use the over-the-shoulder method in bed, right?

[RonJLow]

Hi,

That would kind of make me happy, but infant circumcsion destroys varying random amounts of the frenulum.

Taylor's histologies appear to me to say the highest concentration of pleasure receptors is near the tip (roll-over point) of the foreskin, few in the glans.

But then, that doesn't explain how much better sex feels now that I have slinky slack skin, because I didn't regenerate the tip, I just expanded my remaining skin to act like a foreskin. My wife and I are sure glad I did.

[TLCTugger]

^^ you are a foreskin fetishist! ^^

Hey, dope, there is no such thing as a foreskin fetish. A fetish is using otherwise non-sexual things for sexual gratification.

The normal genitals have twice the number of pleasure-receptive sensual nevre endings as your semi-amputated variety, so of course more pleasure may be derived therefrom.

Whatever defect of your penis or of your mind (e.g. Bodily Integrity Identity Disorder) that made you want to amputate a body part, you only subtracted.

[TLCTugger]

(Continuing response to dopecircaustralia):

With a normal amount of slack skin, the skin can be manipulated frictionlessly over the glans for the most awesome mode of stimulation. The skin just sparkles as it makes a tight 180 bend at the roll-over point, in a way I never could have imagined before restoring. The skin be drawn forward of the glans during arousal and a tongue can be plunged within to swirl around and stimulate glans and skin simultaneously.

[TLCTugger]

The slinky slack feels REALLY good for a man's partner as well. My wife loves the plush fullness with low friction.

She can rub my glans through the skin while I'm licking her and she never has to worry about rubbing me raw, it just feels luxuriously good.

The foreskin derives from the same embryonic tissue as the clitoral hood and labia minora (they're indistinguishable until 3 months' gestation), and it's absolutely as vital to a normal sexual experience.

HIS body, HIS decision.

[procircaustralia]

wow! you have fetishised this soo hard that u actually write such utter tripe. i dont know what you are talking about but it what you are describing is not a foreskin!!

[ChristopherLaRock]

It's not a fetish. The foreskin's purpose is to serve the functions Ron is talking about. The ribbed design on condoms is designed to stimulate like a foreskin.

[procircaustralia]

ribbed condoms were designed to stimulate. they had nothing to do with foreskins.

this is another example of anti-circ people making things up as they go along. just because something suits your sad point of view doesnt make it the truth.

[ChristopherLaRock]

It imitates one of the functions of the foreskin. It's a known fact that a foreskin is pushed back during an erection, creating a ribbed texture.

[procircaustralia]

hahahah,

by 'known fact' you really mean, according to no-circ and their biast 'research' it has said function.

you must have been circumcised at birth because there is no such ribbed texture. its all soft skin and has no similar texture.

i know this because i was circumcised at 18 and i KNOW how much better it is, so dont push bullshit no-circ crap on me because its all a bit scam! :D

[ChristopherLaRock]

If you're proud of your mutilated genitals, good for you. It was your choice to get circed. All I'm saying is that infant circumcision is involuntary, and is a violation of his right to decide for himself later on in life if he wants to be cut or not.

[procircaustralia]

i am proud of my circumcised penis and i will not have someone tell me there is anything wrong with it because i know that what i feel is what i feel, i love being circumcised and love it because it feels great, infact better than when i was uncut.

circumcising your son is a good thing and should be respected. your emotive manipulative drivell is just crap and born of ignorance which is what i expect from no-circ whackos like yourself.

[ChristopherLaRock]

Why not have your son's sweat glands removed from his armpits too? It would save him the embarrassment of having to wear deodorant later in life.

BTW, the REAL wackos are the ones who go around mutilating other people's genitals for 'their own good'.

[procircaustralia]

hahahaa

you are a foreskin fetishist! 'luxuriously good' you have built this up to yourself for so long you have created in your mind some sort of sacred foreskin.

it is very sad.'

[ChristopherLaRock]

So, what's your purpose in coming here and trolling Ron's videos?

[procircaustralia]

why would you want to disfigure your perfectly circumcised penis?

[TLCTugger]

Thanks for stopping by.

Of course most of the world does not suffer from Bodily Integrity Identity Disorder like you do, so they appreciate the opportunity to undo circumcision damage.

Since circumcision removes about half a male's sensual nerve endings and 15 square inches of exquisite sexual interface. It becomes vital to make the remaining pleasure receptors respond optimally.

Adding slack skin protects the glans and mucosa from the drying and abrasive effects of air and clothing.

[rationalway]

Why would anyone want to disfigure a healthy intact penis?

[ChristopherLaRock]

Because they are sadistic?

[ChristopherLaRock]

Circumcision is disfigurement. Restoration is reconstruction of damage.

[procircaustralia]

no it is not.

a circumcision is a very important procedure that every new born male has the right to.

it is not the place of no-circ addled anti circ whackos like yourself to stick your snouts into other peoples lives and families.

[ChristopherLaRock]

Cutting off part of somebody's genitalia isn't damage?

Every male baby in entitled to have part of his penis cut off without his consent?

Well, aren't you putting your nose into our business by posting here?

[procircaustralia]

no, it is not damage.

every male baby has the right to be circumcised at birth so he can benefit from it all his life.

im not putting my nose into anything, parents dont have to circumcise, if they choose not to then they are denying their son this right.

[ChristopherLaRock]

Cutting off a part of somebody's sexual organ isn't doing damage? How do you figure? There are no benefits to circumcision.

You're forgetting that the foreskin is the child's body part. It should be left up to him when he's older to make that choice.

[procircaustralia]

there are plenty of benefits when circumcised, you just choose to ignore them to suit your point of view, you have let yourself be brainwashed by no-circ, you have suspended any critical faculties you once had and are unable to see reason at all.

you benefit the most from a circumcision done at birth, so anyone circumcised at birth should be thankful their parents thought so highly of them as to do so. :D

[ChristopherLaRock]

Being circed or not should be left up to the individual being cut. Period. Infant circumcision removes the boy's right to make the decision for himself. There a lot of men who are unhappy about being cut without their consent, and I don't blame them.

And you always have the problem with circing somebody too tight, so erections are painful later in life.

Doesn't any of that make sense to you?

[procircaustralia]

it sure does make sense to me!

There a lot of men who are unhappy about being cut without their consent... they are only unhappy because no-circ goes around telling them what to think, i.e. feel bad so you can join our cause and help perpetuate our egregious lies, its that simple.

the overwhelming majority of men are very happy being circumcised, unfortunately there is a small minority such as yourself intent on manipulating them into thinking otherwise.

you are pure evil.

[ChristopherLaRock]

I've wasted enough of my time arguing with a troll. Go, enjoy your mutilated genitals.

[stkcarm5]

@ChristopherLaRock

Foregen is raising money to regenerate everything lost to circumcision at foregen.org

[ChristopherLaRock]

Could you cite some of these benefits for us?

[rationalway]

I just don't understand how can you americans mutilate your sons like muzzies and kikes?

[TLCTugger]

If we're lucky, Wal-Mart and Walgreens will be stocking products to help victims of circumcision in the ner future. For now get them through our web site (see my profile).

[megakai]

Hi Ron, it would be better if you did not attach the clip to the safety pin. Over time, the safety pin would tear out from the elastic band. It would be better to remove the safety pin altogether, just attach the clip to the side of the elastic band. It holds well, better than using the safety pin in my opinion.

[ChristopherLaRock]

I found that boxer briefs work well at preventing devices from hitting the floor. The tight fitting leg portions are quite effective.

[aviatorsunglasses]

Your great ron.