t can be argued whether Einstein was religious at all, since he didn't particularly confess to any religion in particular. Thinking that there may be a God does not make you religious. It just makes you a theist. And he most certainly was not "deeply religious"!
Hope you did a more thorough research on "Steve Jobs", Mr. Isaacson!
Or would you also have us believe that Steve became "deeply religious" on his deathbed?
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real an eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith ~ Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology).
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their vital structures, organs, and reproductive system hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select," not produce. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as
I am an Atheist, and Einstein is one of my idols. And I completely understand the type of "God" Einstein believes in. It is the exact God I would expect any genius like him to believe:
"I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the lawful harmony of all that exists, but not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind."
As long as Einstein thought a personal God is - in modern language - Bullshit, he will continue to be my greatest idol.
"Einstein was not an atheist.", "Einstein was an atheist."
Is this argument important? He didn't believe in an intervening God, and he wasn't a theocratic bully. The important part is that he never used a "faith" to divide, nor conquer. For this reason I don't care what his god was, man could not use it to justify flying planes into buildings, nor burn witches. At least his belief was thoughtful!
Einstein believed in the Spinozian god. Spinoza's view of god was that nothing in the universe was outside of god and that there was no god outside of the universe. Einstein was an atheist.
"There are only two ways of living, one is as if nothing is a miracle. The second is that everything is a miracle. I believe in the latter." --- Albert Einstein
" I used to be a atheist, till I thought I was God." --- John Lennon
"There are only two ways of living, one is as if nothing is a miracle, and the second is that everything is a miracle. I belive in the latter." --- Albert Einstein
"I used to be a atheist, till I thought I was God." ---- John Lennon
any ways, at this times all cientifics and estudents of this matter do not bealive in god..... god is NOW just a historic creation of human brain..... bealive do not have place in the actual world............. sorry.....................
2:32 Einstein thought God is "the Spirit manifest in the laws of the Universe” The laws of nature or the Universe, mathematically calibrate and control the powers of the gravitational, electromagnetic, and the weak & strong nuclear fields. Nature or the universe itself started 13.7 billion years ago. God AKA the real measurable laws & powers were here 10 trillion years before our universe was here. Nature was the created not the creator. Edison is not the same as the light bulb that he created.
"There are only two ways of living, one is as if nothing is a miracle, and the second is that everything is a miracle. I belive in the latter." --- Albert Einstein
"I used to be a atheist, till I thought I was God." ---- John Lennon
"There are only two ways of living, one is as if nothing is a miracle, and the second is that everything is a miracle. I belive in the latter." --- Albert Einstein
"I used to be a atheist, till I thought I was God." ---- John Lennon
"There are only two ways of living, one is as if nothing is a miracle, and the second is that everything is a miracle. I belive in the latter." --- Albert Einstein
"I used to be a atheist, till I thought I was God." ---- John Lennon
Is'nt it odd how religious people always refer to hearsay, when they argue about the faith of Hitler and Einstein. In these two cases everything they wrote, said, and did matters less. It is weakly disguised hipocracy.
Free energy has been here all along ,But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,The revolution begins!
Spinoza's absolutes & 'God logic'; exist, not exist, true, false; break under QM.
It is Einstein's other reference.
QM tells us that observation of Nature is limited to statistical probability.
This does not mean that we cannot discover the universe is a 'lego block' in a larger construction, we may be able to deduce something of what it is, by examining ripples upon the walls.
Like the number '0#'. We can make consistent truthlike statements.& 'see' through, string theory is an example.
If I like to know anything about math or physic defenetly I love to research Mr .Einstien but if I like to know truth about the God I will study Father Pio .Father Pio has the five wound of the Lord Jesus and he has passed away on 1968 pls google that and ask about his and his experience or other Saints in our century thanks for all the people who love the truth may be God bless you all good people pls pray for me ty . a believer
Why would anyone have to wrestle with Einstein assuming a "deist position"? If you have the slightest grain of intelligence then you realise that the question "Does God exist?" is loaded, impossible, a non-question. It's the two faces/vase optical illusion. Too many scientifically minded people are fundamentalist, unwilling to accept that their peers may be different to them on the most basic level.
This video can be confusing because Walter Isaacson is largely talking out of his arse. He has written a good book but he seems biased (probably by Judaism) and is mischaracterising Einstein and Einstein's words.
Not that it really matters one way or the other what Einstein believed, but if you are interested then you must do the research for yourself and not rely on shmucks like this for your information.
I would love there to be a god. Who wouldn't? Its just that the evidence is thinner than the lining in my lucky pair of underpants. Not sure why reilgous people try to claim Einstein. He was a smart guy but IF he did believe in a god it doesn't make it correct. A reilgous person attacking atheists is like a gay homophobe attacking homos to hide their own gayness. Its an attempt to hide their own doubt.
atheist are the weakest people in the whole world if u say einstein believed in god they cant handle the truth or bach also believed in god beethoven , all those man who believed are now immortal
God the creator of the whole universum there is on god no more no less simply one god we just missunderstood the way we should life
God the creator the holder of the balance
like air we cannot see but we feel it each day u can feel god in your heart
@thegoddescomposer I see that everything is not alright with you. I recommend that you read very slowly what you just wrote and see if you can spot some of the fragility in your sense of well-being. Good luck!
@thegoddescomposer It's clear that rudimentary grammar and sentence structure are not prerequisites for entrance to Amsterdam University. I've no doubt you are ordinarily highly cerebral, and that today your comments are merely a lull, in what would otherwise have been a lucid, intelligible and thought provoking altercation. I would love to continue this debate, but I have a feeling your responses will be a touch inadequate. U no wit I mean? gud luk wit universutee n ur life n idees n stuf
"I am a deeply religious nonbeliever. What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of humility. This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism.
The idea of a personal God is quite alien to me and seems even naive."
- Albert Einstein
Did not believe in a personal God, he believed what I believe.
The Universe is amazing, but that doesn't mean there's a God.
It is funny when atheists and the religious twist Einstein's view of God because they're too close minded to understand that Einstein's God is far removed from the conventional ideas of "God", religion, etc.
@Anastasius37, a meaningless bit of sophistry. What are you trying to say? That atheists shouldn't be so sure there isn't a god of Abraham because a man as wise and clever as Einstein had a feeling there was more to reality than could be encapsulated with mere mathematics?
Lol, that definitely wasn't sophistry...I am not saying that at all. I thought I was pretty clear. I am an atheist, Einstein believing there is or isn't a God doesn't change anything for me. I am merely saying it is funny how many people misrepresent his ideas because they're too dumb to grasp them fully. Einstein had faith, and I think he was wrong. But for goodness sakes people need to understand his ideas on God first.
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand." -Bertrand Russell
The universe is NOT fractal! The universe is a whole greater than the sum of its parts so trying to reduce it down to numbers is to reduce it down to irrelevance.
Why is Isaacson is distorting what Einstein said? The correct quote is "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings."
Dear God in Heaven Please Bless your Holy Catholic Church. Please watch over it's Priest and Nuns and keep them faithful in this world that commended your own son. Mother Mary Please Pray for Our Families. Amen
As with regard to any supernatural concept of a god Einstein was an atheist, but for a public face he--for practical reasons--wished to keep his lack of faith from the public. The press and the church wanted people to believe that he was a man of faith, and they succeeded. One must distinguish the public face from the private reality. His comments on god said in public are quite different from his personal writings. One such example:
"From the viewpoint of a Jesuit priest I am, of course, and have always been an atheist....I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one.
@TheDarwinman there are other ideas on what God is. Like the god of laws, order and harmony. A god that is the Universe. This is closer to Einsteins Idea, where God and Nature are one in the same.
You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional
atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our being."
Mr. Isaacson writes a vast biography on Einstein but fails to fully vet the Professor's clear reference to SPINOZA'S god. Saying that Einstein is "deeply religious" while at the same time alluding to Einstein's Spinoza-god is Isaacson's pathetic sophistry.
He does mention it, Page 388 on the bottom. Einstein was not an atheist! Also, I read Charles Darwins biography as well, He also was not an atheist either :)
Infact, when they flocked to him, he even said:
"I don't know where atheist get this idea that I somehow speak for them?" ~ charles darwin. :-)
He does mention it, Page 388 on the bottom. Einstein was not an atheist! Also, I read Charles Darwins biography as well, He also was not an atheist either :)
Infact, when they flocked to him, he even said:
"I don't know where atheist get this idea that I somehow speak for them?" ~ charles darwin. :-)
@sammygebre Darwin started his studies of nature as a Christian, wishing to find evidence in favor of God's design. However his own correspondence details a gradual loss of faith. Something he kept quite secret from his wife, who was a devout Christian.
I have a copy of Darwins autobiography that includes all of the comments that were originally edited out. Everything you say is true up to the part where he kept stuff away from his wife. Thats not true at all. He spoke w/ her about evolution/religion more than anybody else. When atheists flock to him he was really upset which why he wrote a letter to Charles Lyell with the above mentioned comment. The letter was on his wikipedia profile, but alas, someone took it out.....:(
And by the way, he never was an atheist. It says in his autobiography that he considered himself a theist by virtue of the First Cause argument...but later in his life I do believe he prefered the word agnostic...
@sammygebre That's something I didn't know. I read that he was unsure on publishing The Origin of Species due to consideration for his wife, however I wasn't sure to the degree at which he discussed it with her (other than what you'd naturally would come up in day to day life after he published such a ground breaking book). Personally I consider Agnosticism to be the same as Atheism, as neither are belief in Theism, therefore fundamentally the same belief.
@PCrePs a common misconception, Agnosticism is simply believing that such a question of god and the nature of things can never be known or at least not with our limited knowledge. you can still believe god does or doesn't exist but you feel it is impossible to really know for a fact. both a Theist and Atheist can be Agnostic
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
lol! your comments are all nuts. I think ya'all need mental checkups.guys consult your doctors now. God simply exist whether a person will believe it or not. Denial of God is simply the denial of one's existence here on earth. Without God you are nothing.
@awg667 the specific discussion here has to do with whether or not the great Albert Einstein was a theist in any remotely traditional sense or not. Einstein was not a believer in God. The closest approximation that one can make to Einstein's belief is that his awe of the majesty of nature was as it was for Spinoza the source and the only source of a deep-seated mystery for him. Einstein was an atheist. He wrote that he was an atheist. Atheists are fully capable of discerning wonder.
was madamme com mon tu ta tag.ist du gutt or do kranken ist du ,oh excuse moi right you scum bag slag bring your brpother styart a foght a watch me wipe your incompetent asses all over the place you failed assasins stcl at dianna she was your last borne assassination lairy cunts for scum your a dead nogger lover lorraine lairy pounce.fucvking headaches why do you anti monachs hide in mental hospitals oh if you get caught you can call the im a nutter card .cowardly scum filth
Illuminati=ET kin aka gods, Annunaki, Ea, dragons, angels/demons, Satan, Pepsi, naga, vampires, bluebloods, Al Gore, Windsors, Rothschilds, Rockefellars etc who rule cults like Freemasonry. Their agenda: repeatedly cull/victimize people via vaccines/other poisons, carbon taxes, Codex Alimentarius, internet 2, WW3 then stage an alien invasion to get a fascist world government/religion with us chipped. Support Dr Deagle, Stewart Swerdlow, Oracle Broadcasting, gardeners and free-energy technology!
the thing about stupidity is, that the more stupid you are, the less you suspect it!
and from reading your poorly formulated ramblings, it can be deduced that you are stupid in a very epic kind of way. while you think that your comments hurt anybody, they are actually proof of your complete inability to think straight. so... enjoy life in your little "dilemma-capsule"!
btw... since you had to deactivate your channel comments because of all that hate ppl have for you... are you sure that you don't suffer some Cluster-B personality disorder? i'd say along the lines of Histrionic/Narcissistic. so why not COPY these words and then PASTING then into google? doh? goodbye. you don't exist.
of course you're laughing... assclowns do that all the time. i mean, think about the logic here: you keep posting your bad spelling, bad german, bad french... i keep showing you your mistakes and that makes you laugh. you even dare to doubt me about "kleine" or "kleiner" although i speak perfect german. but not enough, you even say that your bad grammar is SOUTH AFRICAN english... very embarrassing.
fieken du miene shitzer hausen bad is better than none at least i leant everything rather than being a robot programmed shit bag laugh at what that your better than me at something certainly aint at being assassins better liars .scum
here's another pointer to help you on the way. a "wannabe grammar nazi" would by definition be someone who "wrongly" accuses ppl for bad grammar. but since your grammar is in a pretty desolate state, it would mean that i'm just simply a "grammar nazi". with "grammar" i mean the thing you call "grummar".
p.s.: you look pretty awesome in that clown costume!
how you perceive reality: you're sitting in the audience of a circus watching a magic show. with a dumb smirk on your face you lean back and think to yourself: "ha! if the rest of the stupid audience just knew that those are only tricks!"
p.s.: did i mention that you're wearing a clown costume while sitting there?
here's a lil' reminder: if you call yourself an ATHEIST, you're actually as dumb/arrogant as a BELIEVER. it's like saying: there are no green unicorns, cuz all the unicorns are pink.
Wrong. An atheist would say there are no green unicorns because no one can give them any solid evidence to prove their existence. You cannot be dumb/arrogant by saying there is not enough (read: zero) evidence to prove somethings (gods) existence.
do you need a 1000yr old story to make up yours? maybe in a 1000years we will all worship harry potter lol? do ppl really not see it as a guide on morals? u see it as 100% fact undeniable truth!!! wow "sheep" lets all follow the guy with the thorn crown (jebus) ?????
At the end of the day he is an atheist. I believe in cosmological god. That does not mean I believe in god. I use the word god all the time. That does not make me a believer. I am an agnostic in the same manner as Einstein. We are atheists. Einstein didn't want to be confused with reactionary atheists against religious indoctrination. We are atheist because it is the rational position to hold.
Mr Isaacson tries to shy Einstein away from atheism because he looks down upon it.
I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it. (Albert Einstein, 1954)
Another name for God might be The Order of the Infinite Universe. This includes all of the laws that regulate the forces and phenomenon of earth's nature, our solar system and the many billions of other galaxies in an ever expanding universe. Its a consciousness that transcends the type of consciousness we experience while here on earth submersed within an opposing finite material influence. There is only God which includes flawed man, instinctive orderly wild animals, insects and so on. Simple
This pisses me off. He says Einstein doesnt believe in a personal god, and then goes on to discredit that as anything significant (like he wouldn't give you a snowday for your homework??) and briefly mentioned spinoza's god...does he even know what any of that means? Or he's just hoping no one pays attention, or it just passes by them but the important fact is that he doesn't label himself atheist? URGH!
Yeah, this video confused me too. I don't know what to believe about Einstein now.
Oh well, I'm not too worried. No matter what his views where it should effect anyone's personal thoughts about God too much. Einstein was wrong about Quantum Theory and he could have been wrong about God too.
Having said that I must admit he was great and I have much respect for him.
@2plus2is9 I don't think it is fair or accurate to say that Einstein was wrong about the quantum theory; he just had his own views.
Most people are not intellectually or spiritually advanced enough to comprehend much philosophy, religion, or so-called science.
There are many versions of 'quantum theory', and also many interpretations. It is just a theory, limited and human. Anyone who professes to understand the universe and reality based on such things is foolish.
Einstein was neither way, but here is my favourite:
I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own -- a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms.
He said specifically, "I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God Who concerns Himself with the fate and the doings of mankind." This is a belief so distant from organized religion that he would be surely labeled an atheist, if not for the sole reason that Christians don't want to sound stupid.
He believed in a God. He believed the universe was the God. Not a single being, not a being in a mind like we have with emotions and what not. But a god, a creator, etc. Atheists believe in no God period. So he wasnt an Atheist. Just something like a pantheist.
You're right, he was a pantheist. Although to be fair, most atheists view pantheism as just a form of atheism. It doesn't have any of the attributes you would give a "theistic" belief system. No divine revelation, no intervention, no "cosmic baby-sitter" etc.
Well, thats not not completley true. I give you anything but "creator", because - if Einstein believed in the god of Spinoza´s concept - he didn´t "create" the universe, the universe would have existed always and will exist for ever. And "creator" gives the impression of intention, which is strictley denied by Spinoza, because god is not causa efficiens, but an immanent cause, which is not directly related to the universe. He is - in Jacobi´s words - ground of everything, but not cause
Well it depends on what you mean by Creator. As in creator - consistencies of the universe. Such as life, planets, etc etc. I wouldnt put my money on it that many things in the universe always existed in the form they exist now. But formed overtime - Which would be a form of creation. Which would make whatever formed these things (laws of nature I would say) would be the cause/creator. As far as the universe as a whole having a start - Not trying to say that.
I just tried to difference between the common definition of cause (named causa efficiens by Aritoteles, a cause that has specific effects) and ground. In Spinozas conception, god (or the self sufficient substance) has no direct link to the universe. Just through his attributes (res extensa and res cogitans are the one we are able to percept). And after Spinoza there was no "big bang", no "creation". Especially as Spinozas god has no will or thought. He just produces in the way of his essence
For example nature is the cause of formations, you know such as: Planet formations, forces in which the universe is consisted of, planet deconstruction which eventually shoots debree in the universe eventually helping to form other planets or in sorts, planet stableness, life, resources in which life depends on, the list goes on. Now if nature is responsible for this. Wouldnt it be safe to assume nature is the god in which many believe? Without religion's add ons? (Simply the cause of what is)
Einstein is inspirational. While the world was fighting about god existing or not. He was out on the mountain looking over everyone. In the logical state of mind. Some may say its logical to say god doesnt exist. I simply believe saying god possibly exists or possibly doesnt exist would be logical. It denies no side. But waits for truth. Although many say to see God is to see the natural world (pretty much as einstein says aswell) & I dont see how that can be false to be honest. Maybe im wrong.
I don´t care if Einstein or ANYBODY believed in God or not. If he believed in GOD, GOOD for him, if he didn´t believe, he ist in eternal CONDEMNATION. Where is he now? If JESUS wasn´t his personal SAVIOR, he is now LOST FOREVER...
Kinda funny that you would not believe in God the way you do now if you were born in China (that is, probably not). Thus, you would be lost forever... The God in your mind certainly is an idiot:D
I hope that you all realize that if we find the smartest person on the planet and ask that person whether or not believes in god does not mean that we find the truth or we found the right answer.
"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth." - Albert Einstein, letter to Guy H. Raner Jr., Sept. 28, 1949, quoted by Michael R. Gilmore in Skeptic, Vol. 5, No. 2
How can people worship fraudulent, mythical, fictional nonsense. Science makes religion irrelevant - ALL religions, Krishna, Hindi, Buddha, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and all the other brands of "belief in so-called god". But if you believe in silly angels, miracles, afterlife, judgment day with a fictional god - such bullshit - until one day yo may WAKE UP. Religion is FRAUD, it is evil - promotes death, war, genocide, murder, slavery - it is just EVIL..
Buddhism is not a religion some how it has just been grouped with them, there is 100% proof that prince shakamuni (not correct spelling) excited even richard dawkins believes this.
Religion is SATANIC, EVIL, but JESUS is NOT. JESUS LOVES YOU. I am a CHRISTIAN and Jesus tells me that I HAVE to love EVERYONE even the one who hates me. WAKE UP! God wants to set you FREE. JESUS DIED for you in order to save your soul...
I don't think Einstein would/or did appreciate so many people trying to claim and/or quote him in order to validate their arguments for or against God. It really is quite ridiculous.
The truth of the matter is that Einstein was neither a staunch atheist or believer in a personal God. Both parties need to just get over it.
"He was deeply religious"
Hogwash! I
t can be argued whether Einstein was religious at all, since he didn't particularly confess to any religion in particular. Thinking that there may be a God does not make you religious. It just makes you a theist. And he most certainly was not "deeply religious"!
Hope you did a more thorough research on "Steve Jobs", Mr. Isaacson!
Or would you also have us believe that Steve became "deeply religious" on his deathbed?
larspallesen 3 months ago
@wardydave you are a sick person.
savedfaves 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the world would be a much better place without issacson!
wardydave 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real an eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith ~ Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their vital structures, organs, and reproductive system hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select," not produce. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as
Mogley52 4 months ago
I am an Atheist, and Einstein is one of my idols. And I completely understand the type of "God" Einstein believes in. It is the exact God I would expect any genius like him to believe:
"I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the lawful harmony of all that exists, but not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind."
As long as Einstein thought a personal God is - in modern language - Bullshit, he will continue to be my greatest idol.
pricardo333 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Einstein was not an atheist.", "Einstein was an atheist."
Is this argument important? He didn't believe in an intervening God, and he wasn't a theocratic bully. The important part is that he never used a "faith" to divide, nor conquer. For this reason I don't care what his god was, man could not use it to justify flying planes into buildings, nor burn witches. At least his belief was thoughtful!
dwolfcoach 10 months ago
Einstein's religion is that which goes by the name of 'Pantheism', whereby God and the Universe are one.
Einstein was not an atheist.
valgio07 10 months ago
Einstein believed in the Spinozian god. Spinoza's view of god was that nothing in the universe was outside of god and that there was no god outside of the universe. Einstein was an atheist.
raphanon 11 months ago
"There are only two ways of living, one is as if nothing is a miracle. The second is that everything is a miracle. I believe in the latter." --- Albert Einstein
" I used to be a atheist, till I thought I was God." --- John Lennon
:)
jaqzzzz 11 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
"There are only two ways of living, one is as if nothing is a miracle, and the second is that everything is a miracle. I belive in the latter." --- Albert Einstein
"I used to be a atheist, till I thought I was God." ---- John Lennon
jaqzzzz 1 month ago
jaqzzzz 11 months ago
any ways, at this times all cientifics and estudents of this matter do not bealive in god..... god is NOW just a historic creation of human brain..... bealive do not have place in the actual world............. sorry.....................
teloprezto8 11 months ago
2:32 Einstein thought God is "the Spirit manifest in the laws of the Universe” The laws of nature or the Universe, mathematically calibrate and control the powers of the gravitational, electromagnetic, and the weak & strong nuclear fields. Nature or the universe itself started 13.7 billion years ago. God AKA the real measurable laws & powers were here 10 trillion years before our universe was here. Nature was the created not the creator. Edison is not the same as the light bulb that he created.
ungertron 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"There are only two ways of living, one is as if nothing is a miracle, and the second is that everything is a miracle. I belive in the latter." --- Albert Einstein
"I used to be a atheist, till I thought I was God." ---- John Lennon
Psalm 34:
jaqzzzz 1 year ago
"There are only two ways of living, one is as if nothing is a miracle, and the second is that everything is a miracle. I belive in the latter." --- Albert Einstein
"I used to be a atheist, till I thought I was God." ---- John Lennon
Psalm 34 gl disserz
jaqzzzz 1 year ago
"There are only two ways of living, one is as if nothing is a miracle, and the second is that everything is a miracle. I belive in the latter." --- Albert Einstein
"I used to be a atheist, till I thought I was God." ---- John Lennon
jaqzzzz 1 year ago
Is'nt it odd how religious people always refer to hearsay, when they argue about the faith of Hitler and Einstein. In these two cases everything they wrote, said, and did matters less. It is weakly disguised hipocracy.
goodbryan 1 year ago
The Greatest Scientist and person who ONLY refers to Buddhism if there are religion!
Logically he SHOULD be GOD! The greatest scientist and person forever!
einstein706 1 year ago
Einstein was a muslim look at this video /watch?v=it4fy494uKg it was german translate it
AZRAILXTC 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy has been here all along ,But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,The revolution begins!
JCrim2398 1 year ago
that is FUCKING bullSHIT !
Aikwood666 1 year ago
Fora tv
CEO of CNN news, Walter Issac
and people, still don't listen. Thanks, for sharing truth, when many if not most chronically complainz;(((
Thanks for awe and truth, Walter:)
Psalm 34 vs 1.2
aprox 80,000 heartbeats today, aprox 20,000 breaths from my fragile lungs,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and I gave thanks for none of them;( Today;( Einstein would give thanks.......... why don't we??????????//
Psalm 34:0
Few give thanks:
jaqzzzz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fora tv
CEO of CNN news,
and people, still don't listen. Thanks, for sharing truth, when many if not most chronically complainz;(((
Thanks for awe and truth, Walter:)
Psalm 34 vs 1.2
aprox 80,000 heartbeats today, aprox 20,000 breaths from my fragile lungs,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and I gave thanks for none of them;( Today;( Einstein would give thanks.......... why don't we??????????//
Psalm 34:0
Few give thanks:
jaqzzzz 1 year ago
Spinoza's absolutes & 'God logic'; exist, not exist, true, false; break under QM.
It is Einstein's other reference.
QM tells us that observation of Nature is limited to statistical probability.
This does not mean that we cannot discover the universe is a 'lego block' in a larger construction, we may be able to deduce something of what it is, by examining ripples upon the walls.
Like the number '0#'. We can make consistent truthlike statements.& 'see' through, string theory is an example.
marsCubed 1 year ago
If I like to know anything about math or physic defenetly I love to research Mr .Einstien but if I like to know truth about the God I will study Father Pio .Father Pio has the five wound of the Lord Jesus and he has passed away on 1968 pls google that and ask about his and his experience or other Saints in our century thanks for all the people who love the truth may be God bless you all good people pls pray for me ty . a believer
hsohrabi 1 year ago
Why would anyone have to wrestle with Einstein assuming a "deist position"? If you have the slightest grain of intelligence then you realise that the question "Does God exist?" is loaded, impossible, a non-question. It's the two faces/vase optical illusion. Too many scientifically minded people are fundamentalist, unwilling to accept that their peers may be different to them on the most basic level.
allonewordy 1 year ago 2
This video can be confusing because Walter Isaacson is largely talking out of his arse. He has written a good book but he seems biased (probably by Judaism) and is mischaracterising Einstein and Einstein's words.
Not that it really matters one way or the other what Einstein believed, but if you are interested then you must do the research for yourself and not rely on shmucks like this for your information.
endofscene 1 year ago
I would love there to be a god. Who wouldn't? Its just that the evidence is thinner than the lining in my lucky pair of underpants. Not sure why reilgous people try to claim Einstein. He was a smart guy but IF he did believe in a god it doesn't make it correct. A reilgous person attacking atheists is like a gay homophobe attacking homos to hide their own gayness. Its an attempt to hide their own doubt.
mickyisclass 1 year ago
duuude. i need to do a speech on him. HELP
frecklesbrown300 1 year ago
CREATION DEMENDS CREATOR
thegoddescomposer 1 year ago
atheist are the weakest people in the whole world if u say einstein believed in god they cant handle the truth or bach also believed in god beethoven , all those man who believed are now immortal
God the creator of the whole universum there is on god no more no less simply one god we just missunderstood the way we should life
God the creator the holder of the balance
like air we cannot see but we feel it each day u can feel god in your heart
thegoddescomposer 1 year ago
@thegoddescomposer .... is everything alright?
tonowicz1 1 year ago
@tonowicz1 sure but those retarded atheist is the most sickest people in this world xd they cannot understand this creation demends creator
thegoddescomposer 1 year ago
@thegoddescomposer I see that everything is not alright with you. I recommend that you read very slowly what you just wrote and see if you can spot some of the fragility in your sense of well-being. Good luck!
tonowicz1 1 year ago
@tonowicz1 CREATION DEMENDS CREATION LIFE DEMENDS LIFE GIVER
thegoddescomposer 1 year ago
@thegoddescomposer Rome wasn't built in a day, and your mental health won't be fixed after one You Tube comment. I say it again, good luck!
tonowicz1 1 year ago
@tonowicz1 lol i am in amsterdam collage university
nahh i cant believe how retard u are cannot believe i hope for u there is some cure for u , but i rather for not good luck for u
thegoddescomposer 1 year ago
@thegoddescomposer It's clear that rudimentary grammar and sentence structure are not prerequisites for entrance to Amsterdam University. I've no doubt you are ordinarily highly cerebral, and that today your comments are merely a lull, in what would otherwise have been a lucid, intelligible and thought provoking altercation. I would love to continue this debate, but I have a feeling your responses will be a touch inadequate. U no wit I mean? gud luk wit universutee n ur life n idees n stuf
tonowicz1 1 year ago
White Afro!
QWho2005 1 year ago
the word God has been skewed over time and I think Einstein understood that
BeAsTm0aD 1 year ago 2
"I am a deeply religious nonbeliever. What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of humility. This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism.
The idea of a personal God is quite alien to me and seems even naive."
- Albert Einstein
Did not believe in a personal God, he believed what I believe.
The Universe is amazing, but that doesn't mean there's a God.
tjbayliss 1 year ago
Eistein was fairly clever
JonThm 1 year ago
Albert E was nearly right
JonThm 1 year ago
google Doe's Account, its mindblowing.
Nevyfling 1 year ago
It is funny when atheists and the religious twist Einstein's view of God because they're too close minded to understand that Einstein's God is far removed from the conventional ideas of "God", religion, etc.
Anastasius37 1 year ago 10
@Anastasius37, a meaningless bit of sophistry. What are you trying to say? That atheists shouldn't be so sure there isn't a god of Abraham because a man as wise and clever as Einstein had a feeling there was more to reality than could be encapsulated with mere mathematics?
ananiasacts 1 year ago
Lol, that definitely wasn't sophistry...I am not saying that at all. I thought I was pretty clear. I am an atheist, Einstein believing there is or isn't a God doesn't change anything for me. I am merely saying it is funny how many people misrepresent his ideas because they're too dumb to grasp them fully. Einstein had faith, and I think he was wrong. But for goodness sakes people need to understand his ideas on God first.
Anastasius37 1 year ago
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand." -Bertrand Russell
This sums it up for you.
Anastasius37 1 year ago
@Anastasius37, that's certainly possible. But then wouldn't I think it meant something else and never get to know it?
So what happens after you die? How will I know what to believe?
ananiasacts 1 year ago
The universe is fractal.
therm0911 1 year ago
@therm0911
The universe is NOT fractal! The universe is a whole greater than the sum of its parts so trying to reduce it down to numbers is to reduce it down to irrelevance.
sammygebre 1 year ago
see the arrivals videos on youtube
NoorminAllah 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why is Isaacson is distorting what Einstein said? The correct quote is "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings."
mckrev 1 year ago
Comment removed
mckrev 1 year ago
Einstein? Never heard before...
crieiessacontaagora 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jesus Christ has returned. I AM.
IAMJESUSmovie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear God in Heaven Please Bless your Holy Catholic Church. Please watch over it's Priest and Nuns and keep them faithful in this world that commended your own son. Mother Mary Please Pray for Our Families. Amen
janettehanzelka 1 year ago
@TheDarwinman
C'mon, gimme a break!!
almightyggj 2 years ago
As with regard to any supernatural concept of a god Einstein was an atheist, but for a public face he--for practical reasons--wished to keep his lack of faith from the public. The press and the church wanted people to believe that he was a man of faith, and they succeeded. One must distinguish the public face from the private reality. His comments on god said in public are quite different from his personal writings. One such example:
TheDarwinman 2 years ago
Einstein was not a coward and were he an atheist he would have been upfront about it.
ivlfounder 1 year ago
"From the viewpoint of a Jesuit priest I am, of course, and have always been an atheist....I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one.
TheDarwinman 2 years ago
@TheDarwinman there are other ideas on what God is. Like the god of laws, order and harmony. A god that is the Universe. This is closer to Einsteins Idea, where God and Nature are one in the same.
reno17420 1 year ago
You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional
atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our being."
TheDarwinman 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheDarwinman 2 years ago
Mr. Isaacson writes a vast biography on Einstein but fails to fully vet the Professor's clear reference to SPINOZA'S god. Saying that Einstein is "deeply religious" while at the same time alluding to Einstein's Spinoza-god is Isaacson's pathetic sophistry.
TheDarwinman 2 years ago
@TheDarwinman
Indeed, the reference is skewed.
Lotusflowerism 1 year ago
@TheDarwinman
He does mention it, Page 388 on the bottom. Einstein was not an atheist! Also, I read Charles Darwins biography as well, He also was not an atheist either :)
Infact, when they flocked to him, he even said:
"I don't know where atheist get this idea that I somehow speak for them?" ~ charles darwin. :-)
sammygebre 1 year ago
@TheDarwinman
He does mention it, Page 388 on the bottom. Einstein was not an atheist! Also, I read Charles Darwins biography as well, He also was not an atheist either :)
Infact, when they flocked to him, he even said:
"I don't know where atheist get this idea that I somehow speak for them?" ~ charles darwin. :-)
sammygebre 1 year ago
@sammygebre Darwin started his studies of nature as a Christian, wishing to find evidence in favor of God's design. However his own correspondence details a gradual loss of faith. Something he kept quite secret from his wife, who was a devout Christian.
PCrePs 1 year ago
@PCrePs
I have a copy of Darwins autobiography that includes all of the comments that were originally edited out. Everything you say is true up to the part where he kept stuff away from his wife. Thats not true at all. He spoke w/ her about evolution/religion more than anybody else. When atheists flock to him he was really upset which why he wrote a letter to Charles Lyell with the above mentioned comment. The letter was on his wikipedia profile, but alas, someone took it out.....:(
sammygebre 1 year ago
@PCrePs
And by the way, he never was an atheist. It says in his autobiography that he considered himself a theist by virtue of the First Cause argument...but later in his life I do believe he prefered the word agnostic...
sammygebre 1 year ago
@sammygebre That's something I didn't know. I read that he was unsure on publishing The Origin of Species due to consideration for his wife, however I wasn't sure to the degree at which he discussed it with her (other than what you'd naturally would come up in day to day life after he published such a ground breaking book). Personally I consider Agnosticism to be the same as Atheism, as neither are belief in Theism, therefore fundamentally the same belief.
PCrePs 1 year ago
@PCrePs a common misconception, Agnosticism is simply believing that such a question of god and the nature of things can never be known or at least not with our limited knowledge. you can still believe god does or doesn't exist but you feel it is impossible to really know for a fact. both a Theist and Atheist can be Agnostic
reno17420 1 year ago
@PCrePs true but its said on his death bed he believed there was a higher intelligence behind creation.
reno17420 1 year ago
@reno17420
That is an urban legend.
Even answersingenesis . org lists Darwin's "deathbed conversion" as an "Argument Christians Shouldn’t Use".
doGoNsIylbaborPerehT 1 year ago 5
@doGoNsIylbaborPerehT Where's the damn Myth Busters when you need them haha
reno17420 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol! your comments are all nuts. I think ya'all need mental checkups.guys consult your doctors now. God simply exist whether a person will believe it or not. Denial of God is simply the denial of one's existence here on earth. Without God you are nothing.
awg667 2 years ago
@awg667 the specific discussion here has to do with whether or not the great Albert Einstein was a theist in any remotely traditional sense or not. Einstein was not a believer in God. The closest approximation that one can make to Einstein's belief is that his awe of the majesty of nature was as it was for Spinoza the source and the only source of a deep-seated mystery for him. Einstein was an atheist. He wrote that he was an atheist. Atheists are fully capable of discerning wonder.
TheDarwinman 1 year ago
"Einstein was not a believer in God."
What part of Einstein's saying "I'm not an atheist" is so hard for atheists to understand?
ivlfounder 1 year ago
was madamme com mon tu ta tag.ist du gutt or do kranken ist du ,oh excuse moi right you scum bag slag bring your brpother styart a foght a watch me wipe your incompetent asses all over the place you failed assasins stcl at dianna she was your last borne assassination lairy cunts for scum your a dead nogger lover lorraine lairy pounce.fucvking headaches why do you anti monachs hide in mental hospitals oh if you get caught you can call the im a nutter card .cowardly scum filth
delpha3110 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Illuminati=ET kin aka gods, Annunaki, Ea, dragons, angels/demons, Satan, Pepsi, naga, vampires, bluebloods, Al Gore, Windsors, Rothschilds, Rockefellars etc who rule cults like Freemasonry. Their agenda: repeatedly cull/victimize people via vaccines/other poisons, carbon taxes, Codex Alimentarius, internet 2, WW3 then stage an alien invasion to get a fascist world government/religion with us chipped. Support Dr Deagle, Stewart Swerdlow, Oracle Broadcasting, gardeners and free-energy technology!
deagla2 2 years ago
Watch High Resolution Videos of Nassim Haramein's Crossing the Event Horizon(ALL VIDEOS) from the below link.
Please note: Replace [dot] by .
Dont leave blankspaces anywhere.
alienmates[dot]byethost14[dot]com/eventhorizon[dot]html
[Or]
alienmates[dot]webng[dot]com/am/eventhorizon[dot]html
Blog Url:
alienmates[dot]blogspot[dot]com
Nassim's website:
theresonanceproject[dot]org
tubecrapper 2 years ago
believing in god, does god exist, if god exists, what does that change?
SoCalSocialism 2 years ago
@SoCalSocialism
The better question to ask is, if god doesn't exist, how does everything change?
satchitananda24 2 years ago
evolution
btw i dont kno if god exist or not....open jour eyes and look at universe
crocolix 2 years ago
@satchitananda24 time
Sakar0666 2 years ago
modern religion is a la " I BELIVE IN JOU"
gimme a foking paradise
crocolix 2 years ago
@crocolix
a crocolix is a la " PLAESE TEECH MY SOM GRUMMAR" gimme a foking brains
dumpsky 2 years ago
halt deine fresse
or ferme ta geueule
and dont make me laugh..wonnabe grammar nazi lol
crocolix 2 years ago
@crocolix
"ferme ta geule" and not "geueule"
"wannabe" and not "wonnabe"
the thing about stupidity is, that the more stupid you are, the less you suspect it!
and from reading your poorly formulated ramblings, it can be deduced that you are stupid in a very epic kind of way. while you think that your comments hurt anybody, they are actually proof of your complete inability to think straight. so... enjoy life in your little "dilemma-capsule"!
p.s.: don't procreate! thx.
dumpsky 2 years ago
"ferme ta geule"
omg i kno that all swiss are "Un paysan est une personne tirant des ressources de la nature proche de son habitat"
"ta geule " ta mère lol
i speak south- african english:) just a hint for ppl who overuse "commas" with pretty bad stylistic
but thx for a good laugh kleiner Schwuhtel:)
crocolix 2 years ago
@crocolix
oki, here we go:
1.) kleine Schwuchtel NOT kleiner Schwuhtel:)
2.) "pretty bad stylistc" doesn't really mean anything
3.) be less angry, little assclown! :-)
dumpsky 2 years ago
@dumpsky
kleiner Schwuchtel ist ein kleiner Schwuchtel:)
du bist doch nicht weiblich? oder?
"pasting" wtf is that? swiss english? :)
btw assclowns are here :
/watch?v=459jMgB4ZlU
crocolix 2 years ago
PASTING comes from: COPY & PASTE.
it's an english word, baby.
btw... since you had to deactivate your channel comments because of all that hate ppl have for you... are you sure that you don't suffer some Cluster-B personality disorder? i'd say along the lines of Histrionic/Narcissistic. so why not COPY these words and then PASTING then into google? doh? goodbye. you don't exist.
dumpsky 2 years ago
@dumbsky
swiss can speak perfect german lol?)
""kleine" or "kleiner"" und "der" Butter
btw i cant say even grow up to jou
jou are an immature old grise (45 ) "COPY & PASTEr"
and it looks like google made a "smart" guy from jou:)
crocolix 2 years ago
@crocolix
please stop pasting random french sentences... pretty lame. :-D
dumpsky 2 years ago
@dumpsky
keep posting Schlafftablette :)
Ça me fait rire^^
crocolix 2 years ago
@crocolix
of course you're laughing... assclowns do that all the time. i mean, think about the logic here: you keep posting your bad spelling, bad german, bad french... i keep showing you your mistakes and that makes you laugh. you even dare to doubt me about "kleine" or "kleiner" although i speak perfect german. but not enough, you even say that your bad grammar is SOUTH AFRICAN english... very embarrassing.
p.s.: it's SCHLAFTABLETTE btw... 1 F only
dumpsky 2 years ago
fieken du miene shitzer hausen bad is better than none at least i leant everything rather than being a robot programmed shit bag laugh at what that your better than me at something certainly aint at being assassins better liars .scum
delpha3110 2 years ago
poor jfk they must have been at him when he was a twnkle in his fathers eye
delpha3110 2 years ago
@crocolix
here's another pointer to help you on the way. a "wannabe grammar nazi" would by definition be someone who "wrongly" accuses ppl for bad grammar. but since your grammar is in a pretty desolate state, it would mean that i'm just simply a "grammar nazi". with "grammar" i mean the thing you call "grummar".
p.s.: you look pretty awesome in that clown costume!
dumpsky 2 years ago
btw what is a paradise
a lota chiks...alota food
or whatever jour small brain can imagine
or the universe will be jewish....jews need only power...i dont think they care about their jewish ugly chiks
crocolix 2 years ago
@crocolix
how you perceive reality: you're sitting in the audience of a circus watching a magic show. with a dumb smirk on your face you lean back and think to yourself: "ha! if the rest of the stupid audience just knew that those are only tricks!"
p.s.: did i mention that you're wearing a clown costume while sitting there?
:-)
dumpsky 2 years ago
or maybe do jou think hes following instructions
to bring jou to paradise lmao
crocolix 2 years ago
look at foking universe
if the god created that all...just imagine jour selfe at his place
crocolix 2 years ago
here's a lil' reminder: if you call yourself an ATHEIST, you're actually as dumb/arrogant as a BELIEVER. it's like saying: there are no green unicorns, cuz all the unicorns are pink.
:-)
dumpsky 2 years ago
Wrong. An atheist would say there are no green unicorns because no one can give them any solid evidence to prove their existence. You cannot be dumb/arrogant by saying there is not enough (read: zero) evidence to prove somethings (gods) existence.
drewski8686 2 years ago
There won't always be atheist.
Jackiedajackass 2 years ago
@Jackiedajackass:
you should do tshirts with your thought fragments!
dumpsky 2 years ago
@Jackiedajackass
why not?
atheism is another religion...they BELIEVE
that god not exist
btw i dont give a fuck...even if god created ...just for his own fun
crocolix 2 years ago
his ideas can help inform our own.
jaritos675 2 years ago
Who cares if he believed in a god or not? Do you need a famous scientist to make up your minds for you?
broadcastyamum 2 years ago
do you need a 1000yr old story to make up yours? maybe in a 1000years we will all worship harry potter lol? do ppl really not see it as a guide on morals? u see it as 100% fact undeniable truth!!! wow "sheep" lets all follow the guy with the thorn crown (jebus) ?????
rsvr08 2 years ago
I'm an atheist you dumb cunt.
broadcastyamum 2 years ago
Thats bullshit!
At the end of the day he is an atheist. I believe in cosmological god. That does not mean I believe in god. I use the word god all the time. That does not make me a believer. I am an agnostic in the same manner as Einstein. We are atheists. Einstein didn't want to be confused with reactionary atheists against religious indoctrination. We are atheist because it is the rational position to hold.
Mr Isaacson tries to shy Einstein away from atheism because he looks down upon it.
MichelSainteClaire 2 years ago
@MichelSainteClaire
Einstein make it clear he was not an atheist and did not enjoy it when people said he was one.
ivlfounder 2 years ago
At the end of the the day, its all bullshit! Take a second and think about it see if im wrong!?
Tik46 2 years ago
If there were no people there would be no arguement. Therefore all these ideas only exist in the mind.
mickyisclass 2 years ago
I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it. (Albert Einstein, 1954)
mickyisclass 2 years ago
@mickyisclass
Yes, notice the word "personal," he still believed in God. Hurts doesn't it, I bet the word "God" burns you up inside.
DoNotBeHighandMighty 1 year ago
@DoNotBeHighandMighty God is a word. A powerful word, but still just a word. Anyone who is attached to mere words is a prisoner.
endofscene 1 year ago
@endofscene
True.
DoNotBeHighandMighty 1 year ago
@endofscene
I just laugh at people who get so offended over the word "God." It is as if the word raped them when they were a kid.
DoNotBeHighandMighty 1 year ago
@DoNotBeHighandMighty. It did. It raped my mind.
cyberprunes 1 year ago
Comment removed
DoNotBeHighandMighty 1 year ago
This was 1 year before the publication of the Gutkind's letter.
DemokritosAbdera 2 years ago
Comment removed
wordpressbjr10 2 years ago
Another name for God might be The Order of the Infinite Universe. This includes all of the laws that regulate the forces and phenomenon of earth's nature, our solar system and the many billions of other galaxies in an ever expanding universe. Its a consciousness that transcends the type of consciousness we experience while here on earth submersed within an opposing finite material influence. There is only God which includes flawed man, instinctive orderly wild animals, insects and so on. Simple
SPECKofGOD 2 years ago
This pisses me off. He says Einstein doesnt believe in a personal god, and then goes on to discredit that as anything significant (like he wouldn't give you a snowday for your homework??) and briefly mentioned spinoza's god...does he even know what any of that means? Or he's just hoping no one pays attention, or it just passes by them but the important fact is that he doesn't label himself atheist? URGH!
n800064447 2 years ago 2
Yeah, this video confused me too. I don't know what to believe about Einstein now.
Oh well, I'm not too worried. No matter what his views where it should effect anyone's personal thoughts about God too much. Einstein was wrong about Quantum Theory and he could have been wrong about God too.
Having said that I must admit he was great and I have much respect for him.
2plus2is9 2 years ago 2
@2plus2is9 I don't think it is fair or accurate to say that Einstein was wrong about the quantum theory; he just had his own views.
Most people are not intellectually or spiritually advanced enough to comprehend much philosophy, religion, or so-called science.
There are many versions of 'quantum theory', and also many interpretations. It is just a theory, limited and human. Anyone who professes to understand the universe and reality based on such things is foolish.
endofscene 1 year ago
NERD
brendithap 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Einstein was neither way, but here is my favourite:
I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own -- a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms.
TheObliviousBlackout 2 years ago
He said specifically, "I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God Who concerns Himself with the fate and the doings of mankind." This is a belief so distant from organized religion that he would be surely labeled an atheist, if not for the sole reason that Christians don't want to sound stupid.
thisnameisuniq 2 years ago
He believed in a God. He believed the universe was the God. Not a single being, not a being in a mind like we have with emotions and what not. But a god, a creator, etc. Atheists believe in no God period. So he wasnt an Atheist. Just something like a pantheist.
RastafariPoet 2 years ago
You're right, he was a pantheist. Although to be fair, most atheists view pantheism as just a form of atheism. It doesn't have any of the attributes you would give a "theistic" belief system. No divine revelation, no intervention, no "cosmic baby-sitter" etc.
thisnameisuniq 2 years ago 4
@thisnameisuniq Sounds like what a fanatical atheist zealot would say
CreamyBrown07 1 year ago
Well, thats not not completley true. I give you anything but "creator", because - if Einstein believed in the god of Spinoza´s concept - he didn´t "create" the universe, the universe would have existed always and will exist for ever. And "creator" gives the impression of intention, which is strictley denied by Spinoza, because god is not causa efficiens, but an immanent cause, which is not directly related to the universe. He is - in Jacobi´s words - ground of everything, but not cause
WagnerNietzsche 2 years ago
Well it depends on what you mean by Creator. As in creator - consistencies of the universe. Such as life, planets, etc etc. I wouldnt put my money on it that many things in the universe always existed in the form they exist now. But formed overtime - Which would be a form of creation. Which would make whatever formed these things (laws of nature I would say) would be the cause/creator. As far as the universe as a whole having a start - Not trying to say that.
RastafariPoet 2 years ago
I just tried to difference between the common definition of cause (named causa efficiens by Aritoteles, a cause that has specific effects) and ground. In Spinozas conception, god (or the self sufficient substance) has no direct link to the universe. Just through his attributes (res extensa and res cogitans are the one we are able to percept). And after Spinoza there was no "big bang", no "creation". Especially as Spinozas god has no will or thought. He just produces in the way of his essence
WagnerNietzsche 2 years ago
For example nature is the cause of formations, you know such as: Planet formations, forces in which the universe is consisted of, planet deconstruction which eventually shoots debree in the universe eventually helping to form other planets or in sorts, planet stableness, life, resources in which life depends on, the list goes on. Now if nature is responsible for this. Wouldnt it be safe to assume nature is the god in which many believe? Without religion's add ons? (Simply the cause of what is)
RastafariPoet 2 years ago
Einstein is inspirational. While the world was fighting about god existing or not. He was out on the mountain looking over everyone. In the logical state of mind. Some may say its logical to say god doesnt exist. I simply believe saying god possibly exists or possibly doesnt exist would be logical. It denies no side. But waits for truth. Although many say to see God is to see the natural world (pretty much as einstein says aswell) & I dont see how that can be false to be honest. Maybe im wrong.
RastafariPoet 2 years ago
:-)
vanzylnicole555 2 years ago
oh..sorry....Spinoza's God....that's the logical approach to God
blackcrossunited666 2 years ago 2
how bout SPinoza's God?
blackcrossunited666 2 years ago
Einstein dismissed the idea of God as the product of human weakness and the Bible as "pretty childish."
ChristianIce 2 years ago 4
I don´t care if Einstein or ANYBODY believed in God or not. If he believed in GOD, GOOD for him, if he didn´t believe, he ist in eternal CONDEMNATION. Where is he now? If JESUS wasn´t his personal SAVIOR, he is now LOST FOREVER...
DerAtalaya 2 years ago
Luke 12, 20
"...But God said to him, You foolish one, tonight I will take your soul from you..."
DerAtalaya 2 years ago
Kinda funny that you would not believe in God the way you do now if you were born in China (that is, probably not). Thus, you would be lost forever... The God in your mind certainly is an idiot:D
libbern 2 years ago
I hope that you all realize that if we find the smartest person on the planet and ask that person whether or not believes in god does not mean that we find the truth or we found the right answer.
Arghira 2 years ago
Einstein was a self-proclaimed agnostic.
ParadoxLC 2 years ago 2
that's not true...show me a quote !
Arghira 2 years ago
"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth." - Albert Einstein, letter to Guy H. Raner Jr., Sept. 28, 1949, quoted by Michael R. Gilmore in Skeptic, Vol. 5, No. 2
ParadoxLC 2 years ago
albert is smart guy. but God has nothing to do in this. people that believe in god need to stop bother him let him be in peace
andreinamejia18 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck you
yikeswood 2 years ago
"Where mystery is not allowed, truth is not possible either." (Bertold Brecht)
mrqsilveira 2 years ago
How can people worship fraudulent, mythical, fictional nonsense. Science makes religion irrelevant - ALL religions, Krishna, Hindi, Buddha, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and all the other brands of "belief in so-called god". But if you believe in silly angels, miracles, afterlife, judgment day with a fictional god - such bullshit - until one day yo may WAKE UP. Religion is FRAUD, it is evil - promotes death, war, genocide, murder, slavery - it is just EVIL..
goldstead 2 years ago
Buddhism is not a religion some how it has just been grouped with them, there is 100% proof that prince shakamuni (not correct spelling) excited even richard dawkins believes this.
wishshewoulddome 2 years ago
Religion is SATANIC, EVIL, but JESUS is NOT. JESUS LOVES YOU. I am a CHRISTIAN and Jesus tells me that I HAVE to love EVERYONE even the one who hates me. WAKE UP! God wants to set you FREE. JESUS DIED for you in order to save your soul...
DerAtalaya 2 years ago
Comment removed
wendroid 2 years ago
I don't think Einstein would/or did appreciate so many people trying to claim and/or quote him in order to validate their arguments for or against God. It really is quite ridiculous.
The truth of the matter is that Einstein was neither a staunch atheist or believer in a personal God. Both parties need to just get over it.
Joyness333 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Very good advise!
mrqsilveira 2 years ago