Please note that my book Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Shaped Modern Economics is published by W.W.Norton in October.
Professor John B.Taylor says that: “Nicholas Wapshott brings the Keynes-Hayek fight of the 20th century back to life, making the clash both entertaining and highly relevant for understanding economic crises of the 21st century.”
Read an extract at: sites.google.com/site/wapshottkeyneshayek/
the Nobel prize was unmasked as corrupt decades ago after the notorious jew Armand Hammer bribed his way to the finals for the peace prize. The unprincipled jews constantly bribe prize judges to give them awards. Back in the 1980s the wealthy jewish husband of bad actress Pia Zadora bribed all of the judges to give her an award which later caused the show to be removed from television after the scandal broke. The Nobel long ago lost all credibility and now is even considered to be racist.
@NotAllGoyAreStupid your name gives you away, spouting jews every 5 seconds negates anything you have to say, if you have a message to say, get it across , if you are trying to spout racism, take that shit somewhere else.
Peer-reviewed study finds Paul Krugman is the most partisan economist. Krugman was the only economist to "significantly" change his stances for partisan reasons. Krugman has even gone so far as to contradict his own findings to bash Republican politicians.
The peer-reviewed research was published in May 2010 issue of the Econ Journal Watch (EJW), edited by Daniel B. Klein. Seven Nobel laureates are members of the EJW Advisory Council.
an equation that depends on the initial condition(differential equation) and is very sensitivity to small changes at a small change in time from the initial condition
I haven't studied it so thoroughly, but I think it's more of a qualitative, rather then quantitative, concept.
It strives to explain why is majority of international trade taking place in similar products between countries with very similar economic conditions (when Ricardos classical theory says otherwise).
did u know in Norway we pay to see TV? it is a license called NRK License 2000kr.(300dollars) BUT!!! this is the 10th time Norwegian TV repeats TV comedy Friends re-runs and tons others, and we still have to pay for re-run shows of old USA shows and a license to watch TV that old, well, it should not exist anymore. Give us new creative TV.
As a Swede its very disturbing how these prizes goes out to openly liberal people.
Al Gore didnt teach me or the rest of the world about global warming,I knew it years ago,its just a way to put the light on someone who dislike Bush again.
They gave THIS GUY a nobel prize? That's like giving Michael Jackson a key to the local orphanage. This guy has NO IDEA of WHO OR WHAT the powers behind all this are. He thinks it's BUSH?
hahahahahaha
He needs a good lesson about the truth of the Illuminati and the powers behind them
The american goverment doesn't know either the truth about the world. Don't pretend that you're special, cuz we are ALL IN THE SAME BOAT - both the swedish people and the americans need to unite against illuminati. The swedish people didn't give the prize - THEY DID. So, please show some respect.
The Nobel Prize committee has lost all credibility!! haha! First Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, now Krugman. Who's next Michael Moore! Krugman is a liberal Democrat shill journalist. Fuck him and the Marxist horse he rode in on! Bush is only guilty of giving in to Democrat policies like those of Dodd and Barney Frank on Fannie Mae. He's not the architect, he's the one who went along to get along. So Krugman blames Bush and lets Frank off the hook? Proof he didn't deserve to win.
Dude...seriously, you need to cram the tinfoil into the cracks in the wall to really really keep the microwaves out. Otherwise you get convinced that the Nobel Prize is meaningless...the ongoing indoctrination that if it ain't happenin' in the US, it h'aint real.
I think you are confusing the political nature of the peace prize with the other nobel prizes. I've studied with two Noble prize winning economists and they were libertarians. Few serious economists are partisan at all. They are scientists.
You really have to stop watching fox news, or your capacity of thought will shrink completely. You obviously have no memory at all and your reductionist pseudo-argument doesn't comprehend that this goes much beyond a democrat vs republican problem. The fact is that this mans analysis has contributed greatly to public knowledge of economics. As always you resort to the first devil that pops into your miniature brain to defame: Marx. He is a Keynesian economist, but you obviosly have no clue.
The executive is the branch that implements economic policy and budgets along with regulatory measures in the financial sector. The congress was held by a republican majority from 2000 through 2004, when the largest historical deregulatory measures where ever taken in the history of the financial sector. I would strongly advise you to read up on the deeply rooted causes of this crisis and how they are not product of some senator named Frank. Please...don't be ridiculous.
That kind of simplified selective memory is the one that allows politicians to pull a wool on your eyes. Also read up on the most basic things on economic theory. Read about Keynes and then learn who he is. See if he has anything to do with Marx at all. Leave your illiterate ahistorical opinions out of adult conversations or otherwise don't have them. Or do have them and be the scorn and ridicule of others because of your absolutely inept and ignorant ways. In other words, shut the fuck up.
MIT is the only university that received most nobel prize. So all those folkz in MIT are all liberal right? they earned nobel prize becouse they happen to be "liberal" right?
What kinda of crap is that? You want sweden to give nobel prize to bush lol? Bunch of uneducated conservative racist shitheads
YES waranle - all foolish people who go to University and listen become brainwashed if they don't have the truth of God in their hearts. ALL WHO ARE STUPID AND FOLLOW LIES ARE LIBERALS.
Better wake up... the world is about to change and if you don't know God in your heart you will be just like the foolish libs making crap up to suit your lusts
The premise of your question is flawed. I don't have a private definition, as you imply with "your definition," and I'm not here to be your vocabulary coach, especially for an everyday word. Do you not know how to use a dictionary? If you don't know from everyday usage, it will help you, I think.
With regards to personal definitions of words, that would defeat the purpose of language wouldn't it?
I am simply intrigued by the use of the term "liberal" as a derogatory term.
The success of the USA is to a large extent based on liberal values, especially on liberty of the individual and a limitation of power of the state over the individual. Surely those are good things?
Now that you have joined the conversation:
What then, is the definition of a liberal, as you know it?
Fair enough. The word "liberal" has become pejorative because of objection to liberal policies, reforms promised to be progressive, such as gun control and welfare, which have unintended consequences that show tampering with established laws and traditions is dangerous when done by tiny-minded egomaniacs like Nancy Pelosi, a good example of a self-satisfied vacuous liberal. Look at F.A. Hayek's The Road to Serfdom to learn about liberalism. Look at Reagan, by contrast, a conservative.
This is an obvious and shameless political endorsement from liberals to fellow liberals. Liberals and their institutions are out of the closet, the Nobel Prize is 100% leftist politics. The Nobel Prize has lost credibility in my eyes.
The Nobel Prize is yet another liberal-socialist institution pushing for the leftist ideology. Krugman is a huge asshole, the Nobel Prize keeps being diminished year after year.
Oh and the Nobel Prize has been exposed as a far-left activist organization for a while now... Yassir Arafat getting the Nobel Peace Prize!? Why not Osama bin Laden while you're at it you Swedish cunts!? Then this other "beaut" Al Gore getting a Nobel Prize for one of the biggest frauds ever called Global Warming, a new Y2K but without an expiration date and renewed excuses for the government to tell you what to do in every single aspect of your life, what you eat, drive, travel, live, buy...
Sure, stick to your fringe destitute ideas about life, that will get you ahead! Only the most ignorant, uneducated, blind person would call a keynesian economist a "commie." Do you even know anything about economics? Do you even know what communism is anymore or is it just part of your simplified political repertoir? I won't even talk about your pseudo-conspiratory ideas about nobel prices. Please abstain yourself from voting, rednecks like yourself have taken over america, please let go.
certainly neo-marxist are not communist, nor keynesians are, but as time unveils its secret the role of a scientific driven state and central planing will increase.
of course that all depends what one defines state.
The only way keynesian economics and neo-marxist "convene" is in a very supperficial manner. In essence, they are diametrically opposed,. Keynesian economics propose the state as an agent of very limited regulation and stimulation of a private activity, but unlike marxism the state is not the central core of the economy, it only plays a supporting role. The only point in common is the one many economic theories, not only these two have: that the state must play SOME role.
it make no difference in what model of government you apply keynesianism; they don't refer to ownership, but market dynamics.
its all depends what you assume state is.
you presumably refer to government, where as it can exceed that narrow definition.
in fact state in a more general concept of it, refines every activity either is private, social or economical one with thousands regulations: by no means there is a limited effect of government in production.
The whole body of Keynes' theories are written with the underlaying assumption that the government is not a body that should own the complete means of production, but instead that it should be an agent of intervention in the market place, not only by stimulation but also limited ownership and regulatory measures. Those two are very distinct notions not "semantics". Please rephrase whatever else you tried to write, the rest of the paragraph is incomprehensible.
I watched this guy on CNN defending Obama's clean energy job creation proposals, and, quite independently of the politics (which I favored), I thought this man was sharp as a scalpel. Good for him.
Krugman is the biggest joke ever. The Bush administration did EVERYTHING he said we should've done.
zanariot 3 months ago
Chinese cannot get Nobel prize. The reason is that China doesn't invest in the Nobel fund.
For instance, Japan invests about 1.5 billion yen in the Nobel fund every year.
wabwab2754 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please note that my book Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Shaped Modern Economics is published by W.W.Norton in October.
Professor John B.Taylor says that: “Nicholas Wapshott brings the Keynes-Hayek fight of the 20th century back to life, making the clash both entertaining and highly relevant for understanding economic crises of the 21st century.”
Read an extract at: sites.google.com/site/wapshottkeyneshayek/
Nicholas Wapshott
nhwapshott 7 months ago
ANOTHER MUSLIM MAKING A DIFFERENCE IN A LOST WORLD OF FAKE RELIGIONS AND FALSE GODS...CONVERT TO ALLAH NOW OR PAY!
tjenk712 1 year ago
@tjenk712 wait what?
adsfasdkjfh 7 months ago
the Nobel prize was unmasked as corrupt decades ago after the notorious jew Armand Hammer bribed his way to the finals for the peace prize. The unprincipled jews constantly bribe prize judges to give them awards. Back in the 1980s the wealthy jewish husband of bad actress Pia Zadora bribed all of the judges to give her an award which later caused the show to be removed from television after the scandal broke. The Nobel long ago lost all credibility and now is even considered to be racist.
NotAllGoyAreStupid 1 year ago
@NotAllGoyAreStupid your name gives you away, spouting jews every 5 seconds negates anything you have to say, if you have a message to say, get it across , if you are trying to spout racism, take that shit somewhere else.
Jackalofdeath 1 year ago
judaism is racism. zionism is racism as the United Nations ruled in 1975. Grow a brain and discover the real racists.
NotAllGoyAreStupid 1 year ago
@NotAllGoyAreStupid
go take risperdal
njemnu112 1 year ago
A great man with great ideas. Thank you Mr Krugman for your genius.
honnenut 1 year ago
Goes to show what an inflated sham the Nobel Prize really is, when charlatans like Krugman receive it.
TheBrotherMouzone 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheBrotherMouzone 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Peer-reviewed study finds Paul Krugman is the most partisan economist. Krugman was the only economist to "significantly" change his stances for partisan reasons. Krugman has even gone so far as to contradict his own findings to bash Republican politicians.
The peer-reviewed research was published in May 2010 issue of the Econ Journal Watch (EJW), edited by Daniel B. Klein. Seven Nobel laureates are members of the EJW Advisory Council.
islandmuffin 1 year ago
wait this was an AP video? What's with the sucky editing?
xpxzampop 2 years ago
A prize for what ???????????
1peoplesun 2 years ago
The New trade theory.
8080256256 2 years ago
Is it a dynamical system?
axe863 2 years ago
What do you mean?
8080256256 2 years ago
an equation that depends on the initial condition(differential equation) and is very sensitivity to small changes at a small change in time from the initial condition
axe863 2 years ago
I haven't studied it so thoroughly, but I think it's more of a qualitative, rather then quantitative, concept.
It strives to explain why is majority of international trade taking place in similar products between countries with very similar economic conditions (when Ricardos classical theory says otherwise).
8080256256 2 years ago
wow, it IS possible to say nothing, while talking, for at least a minute and a half! this guy is frugal, I give him that.
joshgura 3 years ago
did u know in Norway we pay to see TV? it is a license called NRK License 2000kr.(300dollars) BUT!!! this is the 10th time Norwegian TV repeats TV comedy Friends re-runs and tons others, and we still have to pay for re-run shows of old USA shows and a license to watch TV that old, well, it should not exist anymore. Give us new creative TV.
FerchoCamilo 3 years ago
quezcatol: most intelligent people dislike bush -- so what's your point? give nobel prizes only to bush supporting morons...?!? :-\
earthypig 3 years ago
Doesnt matter if you dislike him or not, you need to choose great candidates, and not based on their political views.
quezcatol 2 years ago
As a Swede its very disturbing how these prizes goes out to openly liberal people.
Al Gore didnt teach me or the rest of the world about global warming,I knew it years ago,its just a way to put the light on someone who dislike Bush again.
Very sad.
quezcatol 3 years ago
I agree. Very good point. You Swedes shouldn't allow liberals to win it.hahaha
Cockknocker99 2 years ago
thats not the point, the point is in our history books in later years will make it look like "Al Gore" informed us, which is BS.
And they choose people based on their political agenda.
quezcatol 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good job Paul Krugman, Now pleeeeeeeeeeeese teach some economy to illiterate Republicans.
konovik 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Whoa, freakshow in the comments.
slatkin 3 years ago
They gave THIS GUY a nobel prize? That's like giving Michael Jackson a key to the local orphanage. This guy has NO IDEA of WHO OR WHAT the powers behind all this are. He thinks it's BUSH?
hahahahahaha
He needs a good lesson about the truth of the Illuminati and the powers behind them
BLESSEDone333 3 years ago
The american goverment doesn't know either the truth about the world. Don't pretend that you're special, cuz we are ALL IN THE SAME BOAT - both the swedish people and the americans need to unite against illuminati. The swedish people didn't give the prize - THEY DID. So, please show some respect.
clarkcolt45 3 years ago
big deal. can he solve economic crisis?
LU29UN99 3 years ago
The Nobel Prize committee has lost all credibility!! haha! First Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, now Krugman. Who's next Michael Moore! Krugman is a liberal Democrat shill journalist. Fuck him and the Marxist horse he rode in on! Bush is only guilty of giving in to Democrat policies like those of Dodd and Barney Frank on Fannie Mae. He's not the architect, he's the one who went along to get along. So Krugman blames Bush and lets Frank off the hook? Proof he didn't deserve to win.
JoeyFudd 3 years ago
Don't forget that Kissinger, Rabin, and Arafat also won Nobels. It's just a popularity contest. The only thing that makes it meaningful is the money.
Zeldovich 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dude...seriously, you need to cram the tinfoil into the cracks in the wall to really really keep the microwaves out. Otherwise you get convinced that the Nobel Prize is meaningless...the ongoing indoctrination that if it ain't happenin' in the US, it h'aint real.
mowriter 3 years ago
I think you are confusing the political nature of the peace prize with the other nobel prizes. I've studied with two Noble prize winning economists and they were libertarians. Few serious economists are partisan at all. They are scientists.
etsneroj 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
You really have to stop watching fox news, or your capacity of thought will shrink completely. You obviously have no memory at all and your reductionist pseudo-argument doesn't comprehend that this goes much beyond a democrat vs republican problem. The fact is that this mans analysis has contributed greatly to public knowledge of economics. As always you resort to the first devil that pops into your miniature brain to defame: Marx. He is a Keynesian economist, but you obviosly have no clue.
wongkar 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The executive is the branch that implements economic policy and budgets along with regulatory measures in the financial sector. The congress was held by a republican majority from 2000 through 2004, when the largest historical deregulatory measures where ever taken in the history of the financial sector. I would strongly advise you to read up on the deeply rooted causes of this crisis and how they are not product of some senator named Frank. Please...don't be ridiculous.
wongkar 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That kind of simplified selective memory is the one that allows politicians to pull a wool on your eyes. Also read up on the most basic things on economic theory. Read about Keynes and then learn who he is. See if he has anything to do with Marx at all. Leave your illiterate ahistorical opinions out of adult conversations or otherwise don't have them. Or do have them and be the scorn and ridicule of others because of your absolutely inept and ignorant ways. In other words, shut the fuck up.
wongkar 3 years ago
Marxist? Seriously get your facts straight.
retardchild 3 years ago
MIT is the only university that received most nobel prize. So all those folkz in MIT are all liberal right? they earned nobel prize becouse they happen to be "liberal" right?
What kinda of crap is that? You want sweden to give nobel prize to bush lol? Bunch of uneducated conservative racist shitheads
Waranle 3 years ago
YES waranle - all foolish people who go to University and listen become brainwashed if they don't have the truth of God in their hearts. ALL WHO ARE STUPID AND FOLLOW LIES ARE LIBERALS.
Better wake up... the world is about to change and if you don't know God in your heart you will be just like the foolish libs making crap up to suit your lusts
BLESSEDone333 3 years ago
This is a charade! Liberals never fail to disgust me. Sweden is going down the deep end.
3rdWorldInvasion 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What's your definition of a liberal?
budweizer306 3 years ago
The premise of your question is flawed. I don't have a private definition, as you imply with "your definition," and I'm not here to be your vocabulary coach, especially for an everyday word. Do you not know how to use a dictionary? If you don't know from everyday usage, it will help you, I think.
JoeyFudd 3 years ago
Hi
With regards to personal definitions of words, that would defeat the purpose of language wouldn't it?
I am simply intrigued by the use of the term "liberal" as a derogatory term.
The success of the USA is to a large extent based on liberal values, especially on liberty of the individual and a limitation of power of the state over the individual. Surely those are good things?
Now that you have joined the conversation:
What then, is the definition of a liberal, as you know it?
budweizer306 3 years ago
Fair enough. The word "liberal" has become pejorative because of objection to liberal policies, reforms promised to be progressive, such as gun control and welfare, which have unintended consequences that show tampering with established laws and traditions is dangerous when done by tiny-minded egomaniacs like Nancy Pelosi, a good example of a self-satisfied vacuous liberal. Look at F.A. Hayek's The Road to Serfdom to learn about liberalism. Look at Reagan, by contrast, a conservative.
JoeyFudd 3 years ago
This is an obvious and shameless political endorsement from liberals to fellow liberals. Liberals and their institutions are out of the closet, the Nobel Prize is 100% leftist politics. The Nobel Prize has lost credibility in my eyes.
Fuck you Krugman, and fuck you liberals!
ItstheJihadStupid 3 years ago
The Nobel Prize is yet another liberal-socialist institution pushing for the leftist ideology. Krugman is a huge asshole, the Nobel Prize keeps being diminished year after year.
USAJuly4th1776 3 years ago
Fuck Krugman, this douche bag is an anti-American commie.
PatriotMcCain 3 years ago
Oh and the Nobel Prize has been exposed as a far-left activist organization for a while now... Yassir Arafat getting the Nobel Peace Prize!? Why not Osama bin Laden while you're at it you Swedish cunts!? Then this other "beaut" Al Gore getting a Nobel Prize for one of the biggest frauds ever called Global Warming, a new Y2K but without an expiration date and renewed excuses for the government to tell you what to do in every single aspect of your life, what you eat, drive, travel, live, buy...
PatriotMcCain 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sure, stick to your fringe destitute ideas about life, that will get you ahead! Only the most ignorant, uneducated, blind person would call a keynesian economist a "commie." Do you even know anything about economics? Do you even know what communism is anymore or is it just part of your simplified political repertoir? I won't even talk about your pseudo-conspiratory ideas about nobel prices. Please abstain yourself from voting, rednecks like yourself have taken over america, please let go.
wongkar 3 years ago
Keynesian economists and neo Marxist economist
convene in this part of history.
certainly neo-marxist are not communist, nor keynesians are, but as time unveils its secret the role of a scientific driven state and central planing will increase.
of course that all depends what one defines state.
amet1980 3 years ago
The only way keynesian economics and neo-marxist "convene" is in a very supperficial manner. In essence, they are diametrically opposed,. Keynesian economics propose the state as an agent of very limited regulation and stimulation of a private activity, but unlike marxism the state is not the central core of the economy, it only plays a supporting role. The only point in common is the one many economic theories, not only these two have: that the state must play SOME role.
wongkar 3 years ago
not really.you just use semantics.
it make no difference in what model of government you apply keynesianism; they don't refer to ownership, but market dynamics.
its all depends what you assume state is.
you presumably refer to government, where as it can exceed that narrow definition.
in fact state in a more general concept of it, refines every activity either is private, social or economical one with thousands regulations: by no means there is a limited effect of government in production.
amet1980 3 years ago
The whole body of Keynes' theories are written with the underlaying assumption that the government is not a body that should own the complete means of production, but instead that it should be an agent of intervention in the market place, not only by stimulation but also limited ownership and regulatory measures. Those two are very distinct notions not "semantics". Please rephrase whatever else you tried to write, the rest of the paragraph is incomprehensible.
wongkar 3 years ago
QUE APRENDIMOS DE ESTA CRISIS:
Que la economía del mundo se rige no por el trabajo honesto sino por la cantidad de dólares fabricados abruptamente sin sustento alguno.
Que habemos demasiados seres humanos y tenemos que establecernos controles de natalidad urgentes.
Que otra CRISIS puede volver a ocurrir ya que no se creó ningún mecanismo de control hacia los BANCOS.
Que el interés por prestamos hipotecarios debe ser de tipo FIJO y nunca variable.
Que el FMI está equivocado.
josejloayza 3 years ago
The Nobel prize is becoming just like the Oscars..
neotoy 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I watched this guy on CNN defending Obama's clean energy job creation proposals, and, quite independently of the politics (which I favored), I thought this man was sharp as a scalpel. Good for him.
everygdusernametaken 3 years ago
Notice the Woodrow "make the world safe for democracy though millitary intervention" Wilson banner behind him?
THE SAME POLICY OF GEORGE "FLAMING LIBERAL" W. BUSH.
Humanity is doomed.
OfficialConspirator 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I love when organizations so openly show how left they really lean.
pinkclimax 3 years ago
Wow a former Enron financial advisor won the prize. Fuck balls.
sniper6081 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Woo. Go Krugman!
socksnogger 3 years ago