You people are so stupid...you act like you are all apart of a gang and you just kicked the other gang out of your neighborhood. Blu-Ray and HDDVD are the exact same thing you idiots!!! 20 extra unusable GB's WOW!! I have both a Blu-Ray and HDDVD player...every movie I have looks and sounds better on HDDVD. You gay ass Sony PS3 fan boys get lives.
Actually Blu ray has better sound and interactive menus with matrix bit aart graphic HD bits. So there not the same and some of the extra 20GB is used however, I humor your views though as being gangs.
Blu-Ray has better sound and interactive menus? Your kidding me? I have had 300 and Superman Returns on Blu-Ray and HDDVD...take a guess at wich one sounded/looked better and had cooler menus...HDDVD. Blu-Ray has not immpressed me as a better product "yet"! I doubt any HD movie has used up 50-or even 30 GB's with special features and all. Maybe as time goes by we will see the poteintal that Blu-Ray offers but as of now I see nothin special.
No it doesn't....it depends? You are saying Blu-Ray looks better on specific TVs using specific cables so on and so forth?
That makes no sense, I have a PS3 and a Toshiba HDDVD player I used the same HDMI cable on my (1080i) TV and HDDVD looks/sounds better. All of my stuff put together is well over 1000$ lol jack ass. Stop making dumb excuses!
The Blu-ray release of Akira has a 196KHz Dolby TrueHD track. That, along withe the film, would not fit on a dual layered HD-DVD. And, Warner Bros. was a HD-DVD camper and ported a shitty version, without the lossless track, to Blu-ray. Not until a few months ago they release a worthy version. But, it still has the HD-DVD video port, so it's not reaching it's true potential. Chrissup, I recommend you rent Baraka and tell me an HD-DVD can hold that 8k video transfer.
Am I saying that it was highly superior to Blu-ray? Not at all, I'm saying it was the more obvious choice. Sony greased the wheels of the production companies to side with them, Sony is loosing money now. HDDVD was a good product, and was the better choice for many reasons. It was easier and cheaper to manufacture, it still had more than enough space to hold an HD movie with special features, there was the standard and HD side which was convenient. Need I say more?
Get the fuck out. Bluray holds 50GB of capacity, with 4 layers even to 100GB. HD dvd only could go to 30GB. HDDVD the better choice? LOL the manufacture cost was the same, HDDVD and Bluray both use the same blue laser, HDDVD just didnt have enough space.
My bluray movies are +-45GB, its 15GB more then HDVD can handle.
Sony losing money? No they make money on the PS3 for a year now. Bluray has now a marketshare of 25% while it was only 10-15% last year. Wait till players go <$100
A typical answer when u start running out of arguments: "you sit all day behind pc and I dont, I have a life" ... Just shut the fuck up idiot, clearly u have nothing better to do then writing bullshit on youtube
A standard 2010 DVD supports 7,000kbps bitrate at 720x480 with 8.5GB's. Think about 30GB's.
jpollorena 6 months ago
Well is also confirmed that wwe Wrestlemania 24 will be ONLY on blu-ray in May 2008 also on DVD.
rickengothic 3 years ago
Fire bomb the HD-DVD factories now!
Most likely deserted anyway...
Archarger 4 years ago
Thank GOD. Blu-Ray forever!
bujoun76 4 years ago
Amen brother
themacbookone 4 years ago
You people are so stupid...you act like you are all apart of a gang and you just kicked the other gang out of your neighborhood. Blu-Ray and HDDVD are the exact same thing you idiots!!! 20 extra unusable GB's WOW!! I have both a Blu-Ray and HDDVD player...every movie I have looks and sounds better on HDDVD. You gay ass Sony PS3 fan boys get lives.
chrissup19 4 years ago
Actually Blu ray has better sound and interactive menus with matrix bit aart graphic HD bits. So there not the same and some of the extra 20GB is used however, I humor your views though as being gangs.
themacbookone 4 years ago
Blu-Ray has better sound and interactive menus? Your kidding me? I have had 300 and Superman Returns on Blu-Ray and HDDVD...take a guess at wich one sounded/looked better and had cooler menus...HDDVD. Blu-Ray has not immpressed me as a better product "yet"! I doubt any HD movie has used up 50-or even 30 GB's with special features and all. Maybe as time goes by we will see the poteintal that Blu-Ray offers but as of now I see nothin special.
chrissup19 4 years ago
well I have noticed. It depends on visual and audio stuff you got I presume but then again my get up (including sound set up) $700/£500. Not bad.
themacbookone 4 years ago
No it doesn't....it depends? You are saying Blu-Ray looks better on specific TVs using specific cables so on and so forth?
That makes no sense, I have a PS3 and a Toshiba HDDVD player I used the same HDMI cable on my (1080i) TV and HDDVD looks/sounds better. All of my stuff put together is well over 1000$ lol jack ass. Stop making dumb excuses!
chrissup19 4 years ago
The Blu-ray release of Akira has a 196KHz Dolby TrueHD track. That, along withe the film, would not fit on a dual layered HD-DVD. And, Warner Bros. was a HD-DVD camper and ported a shitty version, without the lossless track, to Blu-ray. Not until a few months ago they release a worthy version. But, it still has the HD-DVD video port, so it's not reaching it's true potential. Chrissup, I recommend you rent Baraka and tell me an HD-DVD can hold that 8k video transfer.
hardcorefrokid 2 years ago
Am I saying that it was highly superior to Blu-ray? Not at all, I'm saying it was the more obvious choice. Sony greased the wheels of the production companies to side with them, Sony is loosing money now. HDDVD was a good product, and was the better choice for many reasons. It was easier and cheaper to manufacture, it still had more than enough space to hold an HD movie with special features, there was the standard and HD side which was convenient. Need I say more?
chrissup19 2 years ago
@chrissup19
Get the fuck out. Bluray holds 50GB of capacity, with 4 layers even to 100GB. HD dvd only could go to 30GB. HDDVD the better choice? LOL the manufacture cost was the same, HDDVD and Bluray both use the same blue laser, HDDVD just didnt have enough space.
My bluray movies are +-45GB, its 15GB more then HDVD can handle.
Sony losing money? No they make money on the PS3 for a year now. Bluray has now a marketshare of 25% while it was only 10-15% last year. Wait till players go <$100
Turkish2023 1 year ago
@Turkish2023 Wow, I didn't even remember any of this, you're posting on a comment thats over a year old, what a dumb ass.
chrissup19 1 year ago
@chrissup19
Then you better don't make stupid comments cuz it might backfire against you in the future, what a dumb ass.
Turkish2023 1 year ago
@Turkish2023 I better don't make? Learn proper grammar, moron.
chrissup19 1 year ago
@chrissup19
lol u needed 5 days to come up with an answer, and u bitch about grammar? lmao
Turkish2023 1 year ago
@Turkish2023 Sorry I'm not a loser like you, sitting behind a computer 24/7...I have a life and much better things to do.
chrissup19 1 year ago
@chrissup19
A typical answer when u start running out of arguments: "you sit all day behind pc and I dont, I have a life" ... Just shut the fuck up idiot, clearly u have nothing better to do then writing bullshit on youtube
Turkish2023 1 year ago
Lol! youre right same shit. i have both of them and same shit there both 1080p 5.1 audio. one format means higher prices.
dakubster 4 years ago
I personally think HDDVD was better...on paper maybe Blu-Ray is better yes. But in my eyes and my ears lol...it wasn't at all.
chrissup19 4 years ago
I personally think HDDVD was better...on paper maybe Blu-Ray is better yes. But in my eyes and my ears lol...it wasn't at all.
chrissup19 4 years ago