Forgive the probably silly question... Is there a notion of a "1-adic" completion of Q, as there is for any other positive characteristic? If so, is it just the reals, or is it some other object which isn't a genuine complete field? If not, why should the notion of Q_p not extend (Arakelov theoretically, probably, but I don't know any Arakelov theory really) to characteristic one?
The relationship with the Riemann Zeta Function........because there is a conjecture relating to that the Great Mr Connes is probably trying to demystify.....
Good
jalbana1 8 months ago
I watched all of his lecture in youtube.
then i realized F1 reminds me monad which Leibniz said.
narunaru1230 1 year ago
He is a living legend. I'm glad he's on youtube.
bill0chatour 1 year ago 6
Forgive the probably silly question... Is there a notion of a "1-adic" completion of Q, as there is for any other positive characteristic? If so, is it just the reals, or is it some other object which isn't a genuine complete field? If not, why should the notion of Q_p not extend (Arakelov theoretically, probably, but I don't know any Arakelov theory really) to characteristic one?
Very informative video, thanks!
Fermatprime 1 year ago
This is great
Istymast 2 years ago
Joint paper!
cnordheim 2 years ago
The relationship with the Riemann Zeta Function........because there is a conjecture relating to that the Great Mr Connes is probably trying to demystify.....
quillendaniel 2 years ago
Brilliant .....of course....
quillendaniel 2 years ago