the disturbing thing is that on that day 4 separate events occurred yet with very little evidence to support the claims...it is not unfair to question that something other than claimed could occur...the reason their are so many theorists is that fact that if these events could occur and truthful and honest reporting were the result; then where is the tangible proof? Release the videos, release the evidence..silence the theorists!
Why should I believe a person that doesn't even use the word "were" correctly in your title? The proper way genius is "where" not we were. Were is used to say we are. Everyone of your videos has this mistake in it, so if you won't even change or worse realize you made a mistake in your title then forget watching or believing a word you say.
I find it interesting that adorabilly1 would say , "the debris...Could easily be blown into position..."
So a chunk of an aircraft is so lightweight it could be "blown" by wind (of which there is no evidence showing in the pics, BTW).
So I assume would also insist that a plane made of the same lightweight material could pierce a steel-clad, steel columned building like butter, not even losing a wing, a tail, a window...nothing?
at 28 sec right above the KING NEWS red part is debris.
114 to 128 folded over piece of debris. Could they be the C? Maybe.
and with out any date/timestamp I have difficulty trying to piece it together. When is the last image from with the c folded up?
An hour after? 4 hours? 8 hours? That is a massive amount of time. And if it is the debris I pointed out to you, then fire trucks, people looking for debris, or even the WIND could easily flip it over.
Support for assertions. In the images from your video, I can see debris in front of your nice little circles. I don't have video that shows them blowing over, being pushed over, or anything besides that.
But I do believe in Occams razor... debris is visible that looks like the C that is in your last frame in the same images. Simplest answer is usually correct. the debris is in the picture, just not the same location. Could easily be blown into position, flipped over, run over by firetrucks
So because the C is not there in all of your circles, but it shows up in the last 2 seconds, it is fake?
Ok how about this. starting at 114 in your video going up to 126 to the right of your images about 2 inches on my screen there is a piece of debris. that debris is folded over, but it is debris. It could easily have been flipped over by someone going by examining debris. it is near the wall, it is near your circles.
it is called bad video angles. I can also see the debris at 22 seconds
So,since you've compiled afew seconds footage into a 3 minute extravaganza do you have a time line for the different shots?Was the debris moved once everything was calm and things were being tagged and collected?
I don't see what you are looking at in this, I see a shadow then on other pictures I don't see a shadow, shadows are created by objects, if an object was creating the shadow, then moves away, the shadow goes too. That's all I can see, and its simple to resolve.
What is being maintained by the pro-Zionists is that a piece of the debris containining the leter "C" from the word "American" as in "American Airlines" came to rest upon that portion of the wall WHICH IS contained in the superimposed yellow circle/oval
CNN911Fakes and maybe Joe Craine are HERE SHOWING clips from newscasts that that portion of the wall was free from debris of any kind.
In other words, rogue elements within the US military-industrial complex have image-edited debris into it
Geez, like no one can pick up a piece of debris and move it. I guess you expect if it was real each piece should have been unmovable when it hit the ground.
Hmmmm...you know srstacy.... you ACTUALLY MAY BE on to something there!!!
..even though CNN911Fakes spoiled my fun and already blew your argument out of the water
Tell y'what... let's EXAMINE this in the context of other fakery
BwaaaHaaa! LOL! ROTFLMAO!!
ITEM #1
srstacy...has FOX NEWS supplanted their coverage of 9/11/2001 with VIDEO from competing news networks while inexplicably retaining the ORIGINAL AUDIO soundtrack?
srstacy...has FOX NEWS supplanted their coverage of 9/11/2001 with VIDEO from competing news networks while inexplicably retaining the ORIGINAL AUDIO soundtrack?
"yes" or "no"?
YouTube links:
FOXED OUT pt.1
/watch?v=vzCW197AqpM
FOXED OUT pt.2
/watch?v=b9LURV-joLI
y'know srstacy...all the other pro-Zionists---when presnted with these two links have...
...well, let's have fauxSean Connery tell you what the pro-Zionists have done..
...well, let's have fauxSean Connery tell you what the pro-Zionists have done..
Mr Connery? Misterrr Connerrreeeee?
"D'you expeck m'to tokk, Goldfinger?"
"No Meester Bond, I expect you to...cough...no fauxSean Connery ...I expect you to tell me what the pro-Zionists like srstacy have done when presented with this."
Your quite the pseudocomedian kahlmyishmael. Thanks for giving away your agenda so clearly with all of that pro-Zionist ranting. I'm not in the TV news business, so I can't say anything about why a stationed used whatever footage they used, but common sense tells me that it was a hectic morning and producers were working frantically to get whatever video they could quickly, so there's no surprise stations used other station's video, or edited it later.
I am in the aviation business though, and I do know a bit about parallax, visual illusions, and digital compression artifacts. Usually us in aviation laugh at movies and film with aviation in it, but there is nothing unusual or fake about those videos on 911. It's these videos by Simonshack and CNN911fakes that we laugh at. They've done nothing but show their ignorance, or worse their deception in making these videos.
yeahh...but at the moment...you just misstated and then evaded & now you're laughing at Simon
Steve Wright & Frank Greening who shilled for you pro-Zionists are SEETHING IN ANGER that you let them shill for you in apparent acts of treason WITHOUT INFORMING them first about the MOSSAD AGENTS taking responsibility for the 911 attack...
..try looking at "how to destroy the 911 truth movement" YouTube offrering by WarCrime911
Care to attempt to get Greening to embrace your explanation?
The veil is removed. Now if we can get all this info onto one disc.And distribute it out to EVERY SINGLE mailbox. We can put a HUGE cramp in thier style.
Before the collapse, before the pull back order, no "c" piece.
After the witnesses and rescue workers were all removed from the scene (and firetrucks and hoses), the "c" piece suddenly appears. How did the "terrorists" do that?
the disturbing thing is that on that day 4 separate events occurred yet with very little evidence to support the claims...it is not unfair to question that something other than claimed could occur...the reason their are so many theorists is that fact that if these events could occur and truthful and honest reporting were the result; then where is the tangible proof? Release the videos, release the evidence..silence the theorists!
Coachrob36 8 months ago
@Coachrob36 Thanks.
Another question that needs adressing is why they let Osama Bin Laden put so many faked images/videos into the evidence steam!
CNN911Fakes 8 months ago
@CNN911Fakes exactly, good question as well..thanks for posting !!!
Coachrob36 8 months ago
well if its reue and accurate , the c was not mentioned because there is evidence it was planted.
pederman15 9 months ago
Nice work! ...and nice light poles.
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
No sound ?
truckie118 10 months ago
@truckie118 Joe Craine is a better researcher than video maker.
Please have a look at more recent ones. Your assessment of whether there is an improvement will be appreciated.
CNN911Fakes 10 months ago
people can pick up and move stuff ya know...
iAm1dollarProstitute 1 year ago
@iAm1dollarProstitute Indeed.
It is against the law. But, some are above the law.
CNN911Fakes 10 months ago
Why should I believe a person that doesn't even use the word "were" correctly in your title? The proper way genius is "where" not we were. Were is used to say we are. Everyone of your videos has this mistake in it, so if you won't even change or worse realize you made a mistake in your title then forget watching or believing a word you say.
CrashmagnetMusic 1 year ago
this is no doubt why the rest of the pentagon vids have not been released, too much contraDICKing evidence on film.
EarthsGravitySucks 2 years ago
or a "C" that was there and then removed. How about giving some timing about the video? Or this is an optional for you?
fresniak 3 years ago
fresniak
At 10:06 on "live" ABC and CBS, there was no "C"
The FBI clone image used by 911myths is an afternoon shot.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
I find it interesting that adorabilly1 would say , "the debris...Could easily be blown into position..."
So a chunk of an aircraft is so lightweight it could be "blown" by wind (of which there is no evidence showing in the pics, BTW).
So I assume would also insist that a plane made of the same lightweight material could pierce a steel-clad, steel columned building like butter, not even losing a wing, a tail, a window...nothing?
Just melt right in...like butter on hot toast. :)
nameofthepen 3 years ago
at 28 sec right above the KING NEWS red part is debris.
114 to 128 folded over piece of debris. Could they be the C? Maybe.
and with out any date/timestamp I have difficulty trying to piece it together. When is the last image from with the c folded up?
An hour after? 4 hours? 8 hours? That is a massive amount of time. And if it is the debris I pointed out to you, then fire trucks, people looking for debris, or even the WIND could easily flip it over.
adorabilly1 3 years ago
adorabilly1
Thanks for visiting.
I require support for assertions. Blue sky ideas are not facts.
I will remind you that the official story does not mention any airplane debris at the pentagon.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Support for assertions. In the images from your video, I can see debris in front of your nice little circles. I don't have video that shows them blowing over, being pushed over, or anything besides that.
But I do believe in Occams razor... debris is visible that looks like the C that is in your last frame in the same images. Simplest answer is usually correct. the debris is in the picture, just not the same location. Could easily be blown into position, flipped over, run over by firetrucks
adorabilly1 3 years ago
Wow... Blue sky ideas are not facts.
So your own videos are not facts. They are based on supposition. Yours.
You have camera angles that don't show everything, that have bad angles etc... There is plenty of debris in each of your images provided.
adorabilly1 3 years ago 5
may i ask what am i looking at???
subzeroevildusk 3 years ago
So because the C is not there in all of your circles, but it shows up in the last 2 seconds, it is fake?
Ok how about this. starting at 114 in your video going up to 126 to the right of your images about 2 inches on my screen there is a piece of debris. that debris is folded over, but it is debris. It could easily have been flipped over by someone going by examining debris. it is near the wall, it is near your circles.
it is called bad video angles. I can also see the debris at 22 seconds
adorabilly1 3 years ago
So,since you've compiled afew seconds footage into a 3 minute extravaganza do you have a time line for the different shots?Was the debris moved once everything was calm and things were being tagged and collected?
Seriously pathethic waste of time.
Reactordrone 3 years ago
reactordrone
One of the nice things about YouTube is that even guys like you that don't watch the videos still add to the view count.
Just for the record, one frame of TV footage is about 1/30th of a second.
crime scenes require chains of evidence custody. A sinlge break invalidates the evidence totally for use in getting a conviction...
Unless it was moved at the perp's request as on 911.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
I don't see what you are looking at in this, I see a shadow then on other pictures I don't see a shadow, shadows are created by objects, if an object was creating the shadow, then moves away, the shadow goes too. That's all I can see, and its simple to resolve.
youroom101 3 years ago 2
What is being maintained by the pro-Zionists is that a piece of the debris containining the leter "C" from the word "American" as in "American Airlines" came to rest upon that portion of the wall WHICH IS contained in the superimposed yellow circle/oval
CNN911Fakes and maybe Joe Craine are HERE SHOWING clips from newscasts that that portion of the wall was free from debris of any kind.
In other words, rogue elements within the US military-industrial complex have image-edited debris into it
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago 2
nice work.
DeckardsDream 3 years ago
Bamboozled!!
RexNunc 3 years ago
Just checking for comments from debunkers.....nope.....none yet.....
This is one subject the debunkers won't touch and avoid like the plague.
I've asked them all to look at this video and they won't.
GARY171064 3 years ago 2
Thanks. They are now thumbing comments down. for a great laugh, check the tribute video
watch?v=K6SFxeDMg4E
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
any debunkers here yet.....nope.....wonder why???
GARY171064 3 years ago 2
Thanks for checking back.
Actually none of my now 115 videos has any debunkers. Just these lurkers who don't like the comments!
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Geez, like no one can pick up a piece of debris and move it. I guess you expect if it was real each piece should have been unmovable when it hit the ground.
srstacy 3 years ago
Yeh, that's the law.
Thanks for your confirmatin that it was planted, again.
No, I think the law should be obeyed.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
BwaaaHaaa!
Is that the best that the pro-Zionists can offer up?
ROTFLMAO!!! LOL!
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago
So kahlmyishmael, it's easier to believe the whole thing was faked than to believe someone picked up a piece of metal and moved it?
in your words ---
BwaaHaaa!
ROTFLMAO!!! LOL!
srstacy 3 years ago
srstacy
Get the official version that mentions the piece and how it was found and why it got moved for all of us, otherwise, don't restate that here.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Hmmmm...you know srstacy.... you ACTUALLY MAY BE on to something there!!!
..even though CNN911Fakes spoiled my fun and already blew your argument out of the water
Tell y'what... let's EXAMINE this in the context of other fakery
BwaaaHaaa! LOL! ROTFLMAO!!
ITEM #1
srstacy...has FOX NEWS supplanted their coverage of 9/11/2001 with VIDEO from competing news networks while inexplicably retaining the ORIGINAL AUDIO soundtrack?
"yes" or "no"?
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago
srstacy...has FOX NEWS supplanted their coverage of 9/11/2001 with VIDEO from competing news networks while inexplicably retaining the ORIGINAL AUDIO soundtrack?
"yes" or "no"?
YouTube links:
FOXED OUT pt.1
/watch?v=vzCW197AqpM
FOXED OUT pt.2
/watch?v=b9LURV-joLI
y'know srstacy...all the other pro-Zionists---when presnted with these two links have...
...well, let's have fauxSean Connery tell you what the pro-Zionists have done..
Mr Connery? Misterrr Connerrreeeee?
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago
...well, let's have fauxSean Connery tell you what the pro-Zionists have done..
Mr Connery? Misterrr Connerrreeeee?
"D'you expeck m'to tokk, Goldfinger?"
"No Meester Bond, I expect you to...cough...no fauxSean Connery ...I expect you to tell me what the pro-Zionists like srstacy have done when presented with this."
"they've crrrrapped their panties and fled"
THANK YOU, MR CONNERY!
..."they've really taken it up the tookkuss"
THANKS AGAIN, MR. CONNERY.That's quite enuf
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago 2
"they've crrrrapped their panties and fled"
THANK YOU, MR CONNERY!
..."they've really taken it up the tookkuss"
THANKS AGAIN, MR. CONNERY.That's quite enuogh!
"More cushion to the pro-Zionist cushion"
MR. CONNERY...we'll have none of that homoseckkshual tokk aboard the Red Oktober!! Stop it now!!
"They keest*red it and fled with their pro-Zionist panties still hangin' doon roond their ankles!!!"
I regret not asking Scotty from Star Trek to answer the question
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago
Your quite the pseudocomedian kahlmyishmael. Thanks for giving away your agenda so clearly with all of that pro-Zionist ranting. I'm not in the TV news business, so I can't say anything about why a stationed used whatever footage they used, but common sense tells me that it was a hectic morning and producers were working frantically to get whatever video they could quickly, so there's no surprise stations used other station's video, or edited it later.
srstacy 3 years ago
I am in the aviation business though, and I do know a bit about parallax, visual illusions, and digital compression artifacts. Usually us in aviation laugh at movies and film with aviation in it, but there is nothing unusual or fake about those videos on 911. It's these videos by Simonshack and CNN911fakes that we laugh at. They've done nothing but show their ignorance, or worse their deception in making these videos.
srstacy 3 years ago
yeahh...but at the moment...you just misstated and then evaded & now you're laughing at Simon
Steve Wright & Frank Greening who shilled for you pro-Zionists are SEETHING IN ANGER that you let them shill for you in apparent acts of treason WITHOUT INFORMING them first about the MOSSAD AGENTS taking responsibility for the 911 attack...
..try looking at "how to destroy the 911 truth movement" YouTube offrering by WarCrime911
Care to attempt to get Greening to embrace your explanation?
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago
swing and a miss, old chum
The VIDEO coverage they actually showed on 911 has now been replaced while retaining the ORIGINAL AUDIO soundtrack
You misstated & then evaded the ORIGINAL AUDIO..try again
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago
kahlmyishmael
Actually, there is little we are allowed to have anymore:
watch?v=QfJixNOF7Io
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
ishmael, you've never noticed how common it actually is to mix audio and videos in playbacks?
Now, what's your PROOF of Mossad agents taking responsibility?
And by far it's the "troothers", you included, that use most of the tricks the "how to destroy the 911 truth movement" video depicts.
srstacy 3 years ago
Once more, srcstacy...swing-and-a-miss...this is not their...cough.."playback"
This is what they maintain is their ARCHIVED coverage of that day's events
Care to join an e-mail group where YOU CAN PUBLICLY ENCOURAGE pro-Zionist shills Greening, Wright & Roberts to embrace your explanation?
They're seething in anger that you pro-Zionists allowed them to commit an apparent act of treason without telling them about this stuff
Go to my comments at "How to destroy 911 truth" by WarCrime911
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago
Not a popular video for the 9/11 debunkers is it.....proves what a good video this is...
GARY171064 3 years ago
Thanks.
They are now using the
"Honey, I have no idea how that naked person got in our bed and I knew I forgot something, that's why I cam back to the bedroom - to get dressed"
argument.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Just checking for debunkers comments on this video.....no.....none yet.
The truth is here.....spread the word.
GARY171064 3 years ago
Thanks.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
The veil is removed. Now if we can get all this info onto one disc.And distribute it out to EVERY SINGLE mailbox. We can put a HUGE cramp in thier style.
Good job!!!
Peace
HJ
tornadokidf5 3 years ago
Another week has passed and still no debunkers.....because you can't debunk facts.....
GARY171064 3 years ago
I notice the debunkers don't comment here!!!
GARY171064 3 years ago
I guess they just don't C the point.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Before the collapse, before the pull back order, no "c" piece.
After the witnesses and rescue workers were all removed from the scene (and firetrucks and hoses), the "c" piece suddenly appears. How did the "terrorists" do that?
wakenbake22 3 years ago 2