mysterious world lake monsters 3 of 3

[cape6000jkg]

Apparently what they are talking about seeing is a rare and undocumented type of whale that is long, slender and somewhat snakelike. It is similar to what the prehistoric zeuglodon whale looked like. I think the neck and body pic is school of fish or a hoax. But the film clip from the 1960s, as I said looks to me like an otter. The author and analysts could have confused it's wake with it's body and thus overestimated it's size. An otter gets to about six feet long.

[OrthodoxPlanet]

thanks

[whyhatestrangers]

rip a.c.c.

[daintyfoxglove]

Well, if the Japanese can't catch them, then that *proves* lake monsters do not exist, LOL.

[cape6000jkg]

Maybe very tight schools of fish. I disagree with narrartive of film clip bcause It looks like an otter to me. And is it also possible for a very rare and undescribed species of long slender whale to enter loch ness from the ocean?

[bobo007xx]

@cape6000jkg never seen a 30 foot otter with a huge body and a long neck,with a snake head,seen by a water balif,(cop).YOU TARD!

[NightSurfer777]

@bobo007xx i totally agree with you as well they didnt say this in this video but when i first saw this as a kid they said the japanese fisherman threw it back into the sea which i think is bloody stupid

[009kdg]

i not saying i believe these interviews but i think it is possible that there are exstordnary aminals that have not been discovered why not? if you think about in a opened mind a snake can go underground were it is not visible to the naked eye so why cant a gaint amphibian leave deep below the ocean?many things are viewed as impossible into proven possible i believe actions speak louder than words but i also believe almost anything is possible

[Friend2Humanity]

The words of a renegade and open minded thinker!

I agree with you 100%

FREE YOUR MINDS PEOPLE!

[cheerupemokid943]

Yeah, I figured as much. 5:44 doesn't even look biological.

[thedarkallies]

We love you C. Clark!  Thanks for disproving all this bunk.

[13AJJONES]

that was obviously an elephant.

all this proof & he still doesnt even believe his own show. asshole!

[baven522]

@13AJJONES is might not be. is only what you belive in. the world is big there is many things we might not know.

[AristYdes]

i love that in the end of every episode arthur clarke confesses that everything weve just seen is a load of crap. LOL

[pogsquatch]

Well put Hgates101. An example of what you speak is the lack of followup to the discovery in 2003 of bioacoustic echolocation (similar to a whale) of "something" in Lake Champlain by Fauna Communications and Liz Mugganthaller. Since that discovery, no new information or funding has been forthcoming.

[hgates101]

science doesnt belive in this sort of thing, therefore there is no funding towards it, therefore there is no money to be made, which means we have very few scientists searching and our chances of finding anything are very small...which is why we havent found anything concrete so far but nonetheless some compelling evidence that does suggest it can be real

[cheerupemokid943]

At 5:36, I see no mouth and head.

[RealMagick6]

Why is he assuming they need to come up for air, there are fish that poke their heads out of the water?

[AFCscottishNproud]

lol. i love the 'researche' leaving there shoes onshore to avoid noise. why not take them off on board so they dont get stolen. well ,i thought it was funny

[hebikni]

lol ppl keeep believing this ..i seen other stuf that proof it al fake

[jom2ar]

cool..!!

[brunettivictorwillia]

It could be real and i don't think there is nothing today. Or maybe people were trying to make money for leaving. However what if i am wrong; and God created more unknown living thing out of our knowledge. I wish scientis will leave those ceratures alone like others animals today.

[TEC1702]

funny how u put this in pets and animals hehe