If South Africa didn't have the quota system (certain number of black players) then we would have had two of the best players in the world playing for South Africa (Kevin Petersen and England Captain Andrew Strauss). South Africa is satisfied with sport degradation to get players of color, who can do the job, into national teams. Stupidity rules this country!
@uMuDDyu Strauss would never have played for south africa regardless of the quota system , he only spent the first 6 years of his life there. And his mother is English.
@uMuDDyu wait a minute !!!!!! is that why andrew strauss and kevin peiterson don't play for england ???? cuz they want some black players. that's stupid and racial , matt prior is also a south african , way better than south africa wickets keeper
All Indians do is hate on white cricketers. Same with Pakis. Asians, fuck off if you can't play fair and be a sportsmen. Asian culture is really not inline with international sportsmenship, you need to succed and if you don't you are full of hate.
@jashu76 doubt when he first invented it lol, coz he wouldnt have thought that up there and then, so if you were there whilst he was training i dont think u were there when he invented it
this is the side we need now, not a out of form bopara and a out of form Oais shah...soon as flintoff n KP are back we'll have something to cheer about at one day lvl again!
Better qualities of bat and shorter boundaries, KP can make fun of cricket and bowlers, those are non cricketing shots. KP to counted among greats, he will have to perform for a while with consistency. He got talent but not among the greats yet.
dats y i tried dis shot and it worked.. i also noted dat my brother who is also a right handed batsman couldn't use his left hand wen i said to him to mimic a left hander but i was able to mimic a left hander perfectly!!
yeah i can obviously i can't play wid my left as i play wid the right but if u ever saw me mimicking a left hander u wud have been surprised. and BTW i think this is cause i am a left handed person batting right handed so it may be due to dat.
i aggree with wt ever1 is sayin, its a top shot and perfectly legal, but if a bowler can't miz it up by bowling with the other hand then tht solves cricket,(ITS A BATSMANS GAME)
hahaha...that was funny...just because he hit sixes dont gripe....its a high risk shot and he could easily get out...(if you dont believe me, try playing in left and see how it works out)
Everyone who says a bowler has to tell an umpire which hand he's bowling with, then so should the batsmen are wrong because a batsmen never has to tell anyone which hand he is batting it is just assumed, because they do it all the time.
As KP said, it worked for him on the day, but it won't always. He has some big balls, so to speak, and I wish him all the best for his new position in the squad.
I dint see anything wrong with the shot. If a batsman can come down the pitch while the bowler is taking a run up, he can also change his stance. Absolutely legal
@forejack1- then the bowlers should get away with bowling down the leg-side! as long as the bowler are not allowed to bowl on the legside then the batsmen should not be allowed swith the batting stance! un-fair on the bowlers! we want to see a balanced competition! these days with the introduction of power plays, t-20 and ipl cricket is becoming a batsmen's game!
@forejack1- continued.... if this pattern continues cricket will eventually die because no1 will want to become a bowler! Without bowlers can u play cricket? i dont think so! Maybe the icc will swap bowlers for bowling machines! u never know!
the bowler has to tell the batsman if hes bowling over or around the wicket so the batsman should have to tell the bowler if there doin it. Anyway hes going to miss most of them
WRONG! The bowler tells the batsman because the runner has to stand on the appropriate side of the umpire. If the bowler is good enough, then he should get him out no matter what!
Well since you've allready called it improvisation to then say no ball is a little hypocritical don't you although this does then change the LBW rule as his legstump is now ina different position but I did see on the news that umpire taufell said you consider the sutmps how they were in the first place commentif you thinks its weird
I believe the rules def should change, its already a batsman dominated game. I like seeing this in a game but i think if he changes when the bowler comes in, i believe the bowler shouldn't be able to bowl a wide down the 'legside'.
I agree ... it's a batsman's game so we allow the shot to continue, it's a form of improvisation, no wrong in that but once he changes to left handed, a wide should be excluded. Pietersen's the only man capable of that anyway. Can't think of anyone, not used that much too.
speaking of switch-hitting, are there any first-class level batsmen that are actual switchers? i mean, do they switch from left to right depending on if they're facing left or right handed bowlers, pacers or spinners?
it would go on left hander wide rules, the report that gave the green light to this kind of batting said that umpires should base decisions off the handed batting used. So things like leg side LBW's and such forth are done depending on the stance switched to
i think if he swtiches before the bowler enters his delivery stride, his legside should switch too. if he switches after the bowler enters his delivery stride, then legside should remain where it was.
Also a potential problem that if the offside becomes his legside, the slips become leg slips and if there are more than two of them, it's automatically a no-ball.
this shot wasnt invented by pietersen... its been played before also... mayb not in the international games but in street cricket.... there are many how plays tht n i have done it also... successful a couple of times....
Comment removed
digger2455 7 months ago
If South Africa didn't have the quota system (certain number of black players) then we would have had two of the best players in the world playing for South Africa (Kevin Petersen and England Captain Andrew Strauss). South Africa is satisfied with sport degradation to get players of color, who can do the job, into national teams. Stupidity rules this country!
uMuDDyu 1 year ago
@uMuDDyu Strauss would never have played for south africa regardless of the quota system , he only spent the first 6 years of his life there. And his mother is English.
41BobDylan 1 year ago
@uMuDDyu wait a minute !!!!!! is that why andrew strauss and kevin peiterson don't play for england ???? cuz they want some black players. that's stupid and racial , matt prior is also a south african , way better than south africa wickets keeper
shantal577 9 months ago
hes a southafrican
ahmedlama2 1 year ago
great player.....great potential to become best player...
gkrish83 1 year ago
is ian bell still in the england squad or is he still not getting enough runs?
zeeman512 1 year ago
@zeeman512 Yep he's still in. Trott and Broad seem to be dominating for England. Ironically, Broad is almost a tail ender!
Veneratio10 1 year ago
Undoubtedly the best cricketer present. KP hats off to you.
kprules4ever 1 year ago
All Indians do is hate on white cricketers. Same with Pakis. Asians, fuck off if you can't play fair and be a sportsmen. Asian culture is really not inline with international sportsmenship, you need to succed and if you don't you are full of hate.
Tremuoso 1 year ago
yea pieterson is south african as is most of the england team....
shane0lowe 1 year ago
i was there when he first invented this switch hit , it was a great match to watch. he is very daring player and like to experiment new things
jashu76 1 year ago
@jashu76 doubt when he first invented it lol, coz he wouldnt have thought that up there and then, so if you were there whilst he was training i dont think u were there when he invented it
kingcooker 1 year ago
i love men
lmnbu 1 year ago
they are good shots but did u see how far the boundarys are in
TheCamerondragons 2 years ago
They were the same boundaries for ever palyer though.....
sockouk 1 year ago 2
You must have a great eye to make out how big the boundaries are via a video!
Partridgeaha123 1 year ago
Its stupid how short they are these days. Mis-hits still go for six when they should be out.
moggoon 1 year ago
pietersen............ what a freak
conidi2 2 years ago
Nice hits
YouChoonga 2 years ago
Comment removed
harsh595 2 years ago 9
his good but there is no way he is one of the greatest batsmen of all time.. not even close
cjsa19 2 years ago 2
@harsh595 he's South African.
deejaytruong 1 year ago 2
@harsh595 kevin pietersen is not english :L
MrJengem100 1 year ago
@MrJengem100 I know that, but he plays for the English team now, and thats what I meant.
harsh595 1 year ago
@harsh595 hes a southafrican
ahmedlama2 1 year ago
south african*
4f7u6c1k 1 year ago
@harsh595 You mean South African.
skateorthorities99 9 months ago
this is the side we need now, not a out of form bopara and a out of form Oais shah...soon as flintoff n KP are back we'll have something to cheer about at one day lvl again!
nathangonmad 2 years ago
Even tho im indian..but hez ma fav batsman
punjabi987123 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"the saying lightning strikes twice in one place is officially disproven"
quite possibly the stupidist thing ive heard anyone say. since when is kevin pietersen hitting a shot the same as lightning
langdon04 2 years ago
... what you just read is one of the most idiotic comment's on youtube. It's called a figure of speech.
TheReadingStudent 2 years ago 2
lmao..
go to school buddy
jjdons85 2 years ago
pieterson is an extremely talented batsman
bharathreddy74 2 years ago 4
i know he has faced the fstest ball ever and survived.
MegaSweetooth 2 years ago 10
i think it was nick knight who face the fastest ball in the history of cricket: correct me if i am wrong
bharathreddy74 2 years ago
Better qualities of bat and shorter boundaries, KP can make fun of cricket and bowlers, those are non cricketing shots. KP to counted among greats, he will have to perform for a while with consistency. He got talent but not among the greats yet.
indianspartacus 2 years ago
Fabulous run-out from Collingwood.
danbo1984 2 years ago
dats y i tried dis shot and it worked.. i also noted dat my brother who is also a right handed batsman couldn't use his left hand wen i said to him to mimic a left hander but i was able to mimic a left hander perfectly!!
desperategamer93 2 years ago
Slightly arrogant. I also don't believe you.
patrickchelsea2k8 2 years ago
yeah i can obviously i can't play wid my left as i play wid the right but if u ever saw me mimicking a left hander u wud have been surprised. and BTW i think this is cause i am a left handed person batting right handed so it may be due to dat.
desperategamer93 2 years ago
Just like googly (a spin bowling variation) this shot speaks of his batting skills. totally legal
ibneadam85 2 years ago
ironic how vitori bowled him out in todays ipl match when pieterson tried the same exact shot
aftermath4 2 years ago
great skills
i loved it when he said "SAYING THAT LIGHTNING DOESNT STRIKE AT SAME PLACE IS NOW OFFICIALLY PROVED WRONG"
lol
ntdnad 2 years ago
i aggree with wt ever1 is sayin, its a top shot and perfectly legal, but if a bowler can't miz it up by bowling with the other hand then tht solves cricket,(ITS A BATSMANS GAME)
JBrads91 2 years ago
hahaha...that was funny...just because he hit sixes dont gripe....its a high risk shot and he could easily get out...(if you dont believe me, try playing in left and see how it works out)
vindastra 2 years ago
Its totally legal. I dont see the problem.
mother fuckers
CharlieSlater 2 years ago
Everyone who says a bowler has to tell an umpire which hand he's bowling with, then so should the batsmen are wrong because a batsmen never has to tell anyone which hand he is batting it is just assumed, because they do it all the time.
goofydraws 2 years ago
As KP said, it worked for him on the day, but it won't always. He has some big balls, so to speak, and I wish him all the best for his new position in the squad.
Adambrew 3 years ago
yeh, he said it could of quite easily gone up to a fielder and got out
theskateboarders 2 years ago
I dont care what they say....its a cricket shot and thats that...!!!
BlitzAce92 3 years ago 3
yeha thats just pure skill
nk7792 3 years ago 2
call it what u wil, its brilliant
juwboi 3 years ago 2
hahah he sounds like a bitch..
lafacey 3 years ago
I dint see anything wrong with the shot. If a batsman can come down the pitch while the bowler is taking a run up, he can also change his stance. Absolutely legal
forejack1 3 years ago 20
i agree
brooksnk 3 years ago
@forejack1 nobody said it wasn't
RetroDJCarlo 9 months ago
@forejack1- then the bowlers should get away with bowling down the leg-side! as long as the bowler are not allowed to bowl on the legside then the batsmen should not be allowed swith the batting stance! un-fair on the bowlers! we want to see a balanced competition! these days with the introduction of power plays, t-20 and ipl cricket is becoming a batsmen's game!
davidmammen 7 months ago
@forejack1- continued.... if this pattern continues cricket will eventually die because no1 will want to become a bowler! Without bowlers can u play cricket? i dont think so! Maybe the icc will swap bowlers for bowling machines! u never know!
davidmammen 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
CHEATING
that aint a reverse sweap.
but it is fuckin amazing
joshuaneilherbert 3 years ago
TIT.
tnsandland 2 years ago
the bowler has to tell the batsman if hes bowling over or around the wicket so the batsman should have to tell the bowler if there doin it. Anyway hes going to miss most of them
boomer998 3 years ago
WRONG! The bowler tells the batsman because the runner has to stand on the appropriate side of the umpire. If the bowler is good enough, then he should get him out no matter what!
AnInfant 3 years ago
Well since you've allready called it improvisation to then say no ball is a little hypocritical don't you although this does then change the LBW rule as his legstump is now ina different position but I did see on the news that umpire taufell said you consider the sutmps how they were in the first place commentif you thinks its weird
shaungerman 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cricket sucks!
american football all da way!!!!
PeterPan712 3 years ago
Haha .... :-( You have no idea.
RyanBachoo 3 years ago
I believe the rules def should change, its already a batsman dominated game. I like seeing this in a game but i think if he changes when the bowler comes in, i believe the bowler shouldn't be able to bowl a wide down the 'legside'.
youngsterguy4 3 years ago
are u serious not many people can freaking reverse sweep for 6
vinesrok 3 years ago
Andy Flower is a name you used to reverse sweep for sixes. Pietersen is a freak.
youngsterguy4 3 years ago
vinesrok, that wasn't a reverse sweep. That was a left handed shot.
chesmaster2 3 years ago
I dont think the rules should change, it think it's all part of the mind games between batsman and bowler
FinrodSilmaril 3 years ago
I agree ... it's a batsman's game so we allow the shot to continue, it's a form of improvisation, no wrong in that but once he changes to left handed, a wide should be excluded. Pietersen's the only man capable of that anyway. Can't think of anyone, not used that much too.
RyanBachoo 3 years ago
Realistically it could be called as a no ball cause there is more then 2 behind square leg.
youngsterguy4 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
hey i am a young leg spinner and are there any tips to help enhance my bowling
50337000 3 years ago
speaking of switch-hitting, are there any first-class level batsmen that are actual switchers? i mean, do they switch from left to right depending on if they're facing left or right handed bowlers, pacers or spinners?
vladtepes97 3 years ago
2 of my friends bat left handed and bowl right...but they dont switch :S
Fernyrocks42 3 years ago
nodoubt in it he is an amazing world top class cricketer .... switch hitting is amazing
hemanth 3 years ago
So wait, what would be 'wide' if he switch hits?
englishcricketer 3 years ago
it would go on left hander wide rules, the report that gave the green light to this kind of batting said that umpires should base decisions off the handed batting used. So things like leg side LBW's and such forth are done depending on the stance switched to
phoenix45000 3 years ago
I think if he switches, there is no longer a 'leg side'
both sides are considered 'off sides' for both LBW situations and Wide situations... Adds just that much more risk into the shot :)
deepside7 3 years ago
so, if the ball pitched outside offstump after he swung around, that would be his new legside. could he still be called out lbw?
vladtepes97 3 years ago
thats what the mcc have to decide, i guess
Sk3tchydude 3 years ago
i think if he swtiches before the bowler enters his delivery stride, his legside should switch too. if he switches after the bowler enters his delivery stride, then legside should remain where it was.
vladtepes97 3 years ago
Also a potential problem that if the offside becomes his legside, the slips become leg slips and if there are more than two of them, it's automatically a no-ball.
saccerzd 3 years ago
this shot wasnt invented by pietersen... its been played before also... mayb not in the international games but in street cricket.... there are many how plays tht n i have done it also... successful a couple of times....
secay 3 years ago
LOL
warlock07 3 years ago
Cric-Tube(.com) Watch the Latest Cricket IPL Highlights and Cricket Clips online
mizukiin 3 years ago