@JaLalalover I'm in 3rd year at uni. This is suppose to be knowledge when dealing with certain types of encryptions and decryption in network security (Information and Technology degree). This is only one example and i'm sure there are many others.
It has hundreds of applications through Linear Algebra. Matrices are almost limitless in usefulness from engineering and computer science to economics and physics.
If you have a graphing claculator there is a really easy way to do this........ Skip all steps...... Put your matrix in as a 3x3 and fill the number in. Then get this on your calculator screan [A] and use the x^1 button on the left of the calculator so it says................. [A]^-1.............. push enter. Answer... Easy as pie :)
@MakingCables - DITTO! This really isn't anywhere near as difficult as I was making it. I am going to watch all of his videos. I just hope he covers most of my linear algebra book lol!
@drkmashcore - yes, only square matrices can be inverted
just a question, can you only get the inverse of a matrix if it's a square matrix? or can you do it with any matrix with any number of columns and rows?
Math test tomorrow, Khan is like a life jacket, its the only thing keeping me afloat. Now, to cram and crunch info for the next hour and a half. *CRAM CRAM CRAM CRAM CRAM*
You have no idea of how much of a lifesaver you are!
For the past 3 weeks I've just been going "WTF is this?!" in my math class... This is much simpler then the way my teacher taught me, her way is so confusing, It hurts my brain to try and remember!
@blueeyesofgrey I believe you get the same answers. This method is just the method used before they realized row reduction works to get the Inverse Matrix. Well at least that is from my still learning Linear Algebra understanding lol
@stothek2 Swearing is for uneducated people with no other choice of words because their vocabulary is so small. If you're watching these videos, you're educating yourself. I can swear if I want to, I just choose not to, especially in this kind of setting.
My professor told me to do this by row operations to turn the original matrix into an Identity Matrix, repeating the same steps in an equally large Identity Matrix that would then turn into the inverse matrix.
your videos save my ass every single time! it's amazing. i don't even bother showing up in class anymore. i just learn from your videos. moreover, my classes are in spanish and i still feel more comfortable watching these in english.
Sal, I checked the inverse matrix you made by multiplying with the other one. (A * A^-1) and I got the Identity matrix, I. So you didnt make any silly mistakes! yay!
I'm back in school as an adult. B.S. Physics. You have given all of us an additional supplement with which to augment our learning resources, and for that I thank you. A suggestion from a patron of your videos: Lecture series on Vector Calculus? Thanks again for sharing your knowledge.
Why is the adjoint the same as the matrix of cofactors? does that mean that i dont have to "transpose" or my better guess, is that this is a special case?
There is a different way of doing it by using Gaussian Elimination with the nxn matrix and the identity matrix and trying to manipulate it so that it ends up the identity matrix and then the (nxn)^-1 matrix
Great! I've been trying to figure a way to do inverses in a systematic way, without doing all of that multiplying, substituting, changing rows and columns gobblygook. My pre-calc teacher is threatening to put a 4x4 or 5x5 matrix on my next test and this would save me a bunch of time. ... : S
I didn't do any matrices in high school (though I did my gr. 11 and gr. 12 pure math classes in the same year while they were changing the curriculum around) and you're saying that they do this in many curriculae in the US? I'm doing this now in university, and I'm able to wrap my around it fairly well, but man is it tedious (and I'd imagine hard to understand if you didn't see the purpose or are unable to visualize what it represents).
Ok I have tried this method with 2 different matrices now and it has worked for neither. It only seems to work for yours because you are using such a simple staarting matrix. I like your videos but the examples you use are far too simple. The same with the gausian method, it is much much harder with a larger numbered matrix.
Please show me how this method works for the following matrix.
smokethebong: Try one more time using exactly the same method, I have done your example using khan's presented method and the result is all good. (I have checked it using calculator). You had to made some errors while computing negative numbers. There are some fractions if that cheers you up :)
First find the matrix of minors (as in the video): -2|16|-22 -1|5|-7 -7|7|-7 Then write it as the matrix of cofactors (cheese board + - +...) -2|-16|-22 1|5|7 -7|-7|-7 Then we transepose the matrix (move i,j to j,i, where i is the colum and j is the row). -2|1|-1 -16|5|-7 -22|7|-7 Then to get the inverse matrix we simply multiply by 1 over the determinant, in this case it is 2. -1|1/2|-1/2 -8|5/2|-7/2 -11|7/2|-7/2
haha man thx i just needed a refresher for my exam...lol when u made the first matrix i was like...thats symmetric ...ur gonna get a symmetric transpose and i was thinkingg that if u had to show how to do a transpose it was gonna suck for ppl haha but nonetheless GJ
Good job ! U got it right of course, I multyplied it out and as expected it gives me the Identity matrix .nOW i UNDERSTAND WHY U DISLIKE THEM..I JUST HOPE ITS NOT GOING TO BE ON MY MIDTERM !THANX A LOT, UR GREAT !
WRONG TERMINOLOGY! The adjoint or adjugate is the complex conjugate of each element then transpose!!!!
djp117 5 days ago
@ 11:54 bottom left corner, the 2 should be positive because of the chart plus and minus chart he wrote on the top right hand corner!
CWCWwang 6 days ago
well I hope this can prevent my brain from degrading too
nikmuic 1 week ago
WHAT VILE SORCERY IS THIS?
WormySauce 1 month ago
@WormySauce THIS IS SPARTA!!!
wait no thats not right at all...
jonescomplete 2 weeks ago
who discovered that this worked!? mental
pjgmorgan 1 month ago 2
after this video i can see the matix!
boxerek123 1 month ago
What is this sorcery?! Feels horrible to follow formulas without knowing why.
dqds 2 months ago
@dqds Then go and seek the proof so you feel better, you can find it in any linear algebra book.
kv310 4 days ago
Uhm, how do you use this in real life? -_- I so don't want to learn this but oh well! Dear school, I love u!!!
JaLalalover 3 months ago
@JaLalalover I'm in 3rd year at uni. This is suppose to be knowledge when dealing with certain types of encryptions and decryption in network security (Information and Technology degree). This is only one example and i'm sure there are many others.
89lovely89 1 month ago
@JaLalalover
It has hundreds of applications through Linear Algebra. Matrices are almost limitless in usefulness from engineering and computer science to economics and physics.
Fukkensaved 3 weeks ago
If you have a graphing claculator there is a really easy way to do this........ Skip all steps...... Put your matrix in as a 3x3 and fill the number in. Then get this on your calculator screan [A] and use the x^1 button on the left of the calculator so it says................. [A]^-1.............. push enter. Answer... Easy as pie :)
mrseddy14 3 months ago
We need lecturers like you !
jameswell92 3 months ago
Thank you Khan. I am from Hong Kong
likson2003 3 months ago
It works =D
TheXatheron 3 months ago
Comment removed
so880715 3 months ago
i love you man!!
nitro1821 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
iphone and ipad app for calculating matrices:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/matrix-multiplication/id477093471?mt=8
bebefore3 4 months ago
Comment removed
nf4518 4 months ago
whats wrong with hairy?
MarcoOrBust 4 months ago
Its easy because he always chooses easy numbers. Its easy to solve inverse matrix with 0 and 1.
biruktayit 4 months ago
There's an easier way
jaimix697 4 months ago
@jaimix697 watch part 3, i believe thats the easiest way
jassbansal 4 months ago
keep pressing 9:15
mo3ius1 4 months ago
@mo3ius1 i dont geddit
danielzhang0 4 months ago
@danielzhang0 you can DO IT
mo3ius1 4 months ago
watching
TheLoveformankind 4 months ago
9:15 for words of wisdom!
emirguy 4 months ago in playlist More videos from khanacademy
My professor is doing all theory and I haven't even heard of a "determinant" or a "coefficient matrix" to solve this problem - very useful!
bluestarr78 5 months ago
@MakingCables - DITTO! This really isn't anywhere near as difficult as I was making it. I am going to watch all of his videos. I just hope he covers most of my linear algebra book lol!
@drkmashcore - yes, only square matrices can be inverted
bluestarr78 5 months ago
I love my numbers non-hairy
greeneyedutchman 5 months ago
55-minute lecture, and I leave the room scratching my head.
17-minute khanacademy video, full understanding.
Thank you.
MakingCables 5 months ago 62
just a question, can you only get the inverse of a matrix if it's a square matrix? or can you do it with any matrix with any number of columns and rows?
drkmashcore 5 months ago
One of these took me around 30 minutes to do.....
iKennayyy 5 months ago
Thank you so much! I have such a hard time studying
tedoymisojos 5 months ago in playlist More videos from khanacademy
I'm amazed you didn't make a mistake =D. Got the identity matrix when multiplied those two together ^^
TheProoMas 6 months ago
so good I have learnt sth from ur vids
osx101 6 months ago
dam this is good
mimmoon16 7 months ago
at around 12:51 i wonder what falls in the background..... :-p
123alankar 8 months ago
haha only took 17 minutes...
fourhire 8 months ago
I love you
DotAis4Noobs 9 months ago
you are my GOD
HawkBladex 9 months ago
I can't believe they teach this stuff in highschool. Uni math is more like.. graph theory, base 5 numbers.. etc.
LeBadman 9 months ago
oneoenoeneonEONEONEOENOENEONEONE
LeBadman 9 months ago
Why do you use a mouse and a computer instead of plain simple paper and a pen?..
LeBadman 9 months ago
you saved my life but when i solved at the end it did not work -_- it was like:
1 0 1
0 0 1
0 0 1
iM0NzT3R 10 months ago
Comment removed
moomoos99 10 months ago
Comment removed
moomoos99 10 months ago
I eat inverted matrices for breakfast u dumb mother fuckers.
moomoos99 10 months ago
wow thanks alot, this is way easier than having to do row operation with the 1 0 0 in the first row and so on.
gdogfolife 10 months ago
wouldn't pass my exams without your help! THANK YOU!
iampoy 10 months ago
Thanks you saved my life
tiffhyw 10 months ago
Math test tomorrow, Khan is like a life jacket, its the only thing keeping me afloat. Now, to cram and crunch info for the next hour and a half. *CRAM CRAM CRAM CRAM CRAM*
StaticShock1100 10 months ago
thanks for ur very helpful videos mr.....(dono)
lovexoxomiley 11 months ago
we have Matrices for another two years in CS .. U saved my ass in the exam .. love ur videos.. .
pjtechy 11 months ago
Hello Mr Khan
Thank you very much for this awesome lecture.
CharlieTan84 11 months ago
"non-hairy" - well played Sal
colverjustin 11 months ago
Why don't you use the gaussian elimination method with a second matrice on the right. Diagonally 1 1 1 and the other values zero?
RippzZ 11 months ago
You have no idea of how much of a lifesaver you are!
For the past 3 weeks I've just been going "WTF is this?!" in my math class... This is much simpler then the way my teacher taught me, her way is so confusing, It hurts my brain to try and remember!
Thank you!!
angelwings2323 11 months ago
I love you ..Thank thank!!!
aeonthailand 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How is it possible to dislike this video?
DesuChanXD 1 year ago
How is it possible to dislike this video?
DesuChanXD 1 year ago
no wonder why computers where invented
scottdylan20 1 year ago
@blueeyesofgrey I believe you get the same answers. This method is just the method used before they realized row reduction works to get the Inverse Matrix. Well at least that is from my still learning Linear Algebra understanding lol
OMFGCMON 1 year ago
hhahaa wtf? 65,179 views on math?! kay Im out(;
ria75002 1 year ago
So much better than the stupid row operations.
gabe562 1 year ago
Your videos really help me, and i am sure not only me, I thank you so much, you really teach very well.Thank you again!!!
L0gic3rror 1 year ago 2
Really good explanation.
LAnonHubbard 1 year ago 19
YOU ARE AWESOME!!!!!!!!!
scruff76 1 year ago 2
this kind of math grows an appreciation on me to folks that do computer science and technology that requires these algebratic applications :]
AdThaDon2k8 1 year ago 3
This is DEFINITELY better than how my COLLEGE TA tells us to do it... Thank you SO much.
inuyome1008 1 year ago 3
Thx, clear & simple!
Diastro3D 1 year ago
Fantastic sal...
robertfox1975 1 year ago
Have you a method which uses Elementary row operation? thanks!!
fluffywhee 1 year ago
bro WAY TO SMALL
stothek2 1 year ago
thank you
coppernicuss 1 year ago
this is what my Engineer tutor told me... unlike my teacher in ateneo.. she does the row x bla bla bla which is so confusing.. thanks anyway
lordswit6666 1 year ago
if i fucking hate matrices, but found this helpful, should i like or dislike this video?
bbhardoin 1 year ago
@bbhardoin like, and please don't use bad language. kids watch these videos.
fizaanTech 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fizaanTech fuck you jerk
stothek2 1 year ago
@fizaanTech if anyone is watching vids on linear algebra they're old enough to know how swear you fuckin dirty cow
stothek2 1 year ago
@stothek2 Swearing is for uneducated people with no other choice of words because their vocabulary is so small. If you're watching these videos, you're educating yourself. I can swear if I want to, I just choose not to, especially in this kind of setting.
fizaanTech 1 year ago
Oh... my... GOSH!!! I UNDERSTAND MATH!!!
RandomPerson150 1 year ago 2
What happens when you multiply the top part of A with the matrix of cofactors and it equals 0? Does that mean there is no inverse of matrix A?
SwitchingDisguises 1 year ago
Thou hath conquered the mighty 3x3 matrix inversion. Huzzah!
hedonism13 1 year ago 3
My professor told me to do this by row operations to turn the original matrix into an Identity Matrix, repeating the same steps in an equally large Identity Matrix that would then turn into the inverse matrix.
Way way harder than using determinants
bla7091 1 year ago
ur the saint in math!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ABCba5tard 1 year ago
Ouch my head hurts
simplyalif 1 year ago
you are a true hero!
BattenburgBoy 1 year ago
How do you get 4 degrees from MIT and not understand Undo?
frother 1 year ago
your videos save my ass every single time! it's amazing. i don't even bother showing up in class anymore. i just learn from your videos. moreover, my classes are in spanish and i still feel more comfortable watching these in english.
thanks!
tttooommmyyyy 1 year ago
Dude....Props...
Keablerthegreat 1 year ago
hey that step is simliar to the cros product
skyfaze 1 year ago
If geeks could have saints, Sal Khan would be one of them.
madscirat 1 year ago 14
@madscirat u mean if Geeks could have Gods!
pure5abi 5 months ago
"if i keep doing this my whole life it'll stop my brain from degrading"
one of the many salman khan win moments
CaptainFluffy6644 1 year ago 3
Sal, I checked the inverse matrix you made by multiplying with the other one. (A * A^-1) and I got the Identity matrix, I. So you didnt make any silly mistakes! yay!
MrJavaHelp 1 year ago
quick question... why did you calculate the matrix of minors?
why didnt you straight away calculate the det|A| and then the adj
nivvig 1 year ago
@nivvig the adjugate is the transpose of the matrix of cofactors, which comes from the matrix of minors.
UndeadTheta 1 year ago
I'm back in school as an adult. B.S. Physics. You have given all of us an additional supplement with which to augment our learning resources, and for that I thank you. A suggestion from a patron of your videos: Lecture series on Vector Calculus? Thanks again for sharing your knowledge.
WindyCityOfSails 2 years ago 2
What he said, a series on vector calculus would be very much appreciated.
ActiveCamouflage 2 years ago
mother of god.
i'm so happy the other way of doing this exists.Cause that is a hot mess.
Ykoahi 2 years ago
I got it!
Thanks a lot!
5* again
MiniGeek31337 2 years ago
Thanks. you made it a lot clearer then teacher!
5*
ibanez1andrew 2 years ago 3
OMG dude, THANK YOU!!! you just saved me
pinaygirl23 2 years ago
Why is the adjoint the same as the matrix of cofactors? does that mean that i dont have to "transpose" or my better guess, is that this is a special case?
ndog33 2 years ago
The matrix of cofactors just so happened to be symmetrical around the diagonal, but that won't always be the case.
Happy New Year, ndog33!
amjPeace 2 years ago
its a special case cause the matrix is symmetric he explains that in the video.
theonlyrealshark 2 years ago
very good explanation!ty
hulio1987 2 years ago
this really helped!!!!!!!
cndiixx 2 years ago
There is a different way of doing it by using Gaussian Elimination with the nxn matrix and the identity matrix and trying to manipulate it so that it ends up the identity matrix and then the (nxn)^-1 matrix
will3330 2 years ago
I used this video to answer a quiz question and I arrived at the correct answer! thank you for posting this informative video.
onmyblindside 2 years ago
I hate matrices.. its easy as you make careless mistakes.
quantomic1106 2 years ago
Great! I've been trying to figure a way to do inverses in a systematic way, without doing all of that multiplying, substituting, changing rows and columns gobblygook. My pre-calc teacher is threatening to put a 4x4 or 5x5 matrix on my next test and this would save me a bunch of time. ... : S
NeoXC 2 years ago
3x3 Matrices are a mess. WOW!!
Soulj4h4Christ 2 years ago
I didn't do any matrices in high school (though I did my gr. 11 and gr. 12 pure math classes in the same year while they were changing the curriculum around) and you're saying that they do this in many curriculae in the US? I'm doing this now in university, and I'm able to wrap my around it fairly well, but man is it tedious (and I'd imagine hard to understand if you didn't see the purpose or are unable to visualize what it represents).
david0aloha 2 years ago
I can actually understand these lessons. These are going to save me on my exam. Thanks.
lorifix 2 years ago
I am a retard. But I understood this. Thanks
jeestudent007 2 years ago 3
this video is fanatastic, but its very confusing to digest , though with practise it should be easier.
TajikThunderstorm 2 years ago
So very helpful
tweakedmofo 2 years ago
i have another method of calculating det (A) where you don't need the corresponding co-factor.. but i guess it's easier the way you did it...
andreiduffy 2 years ago
good video
teespoon1234 2 years ago
Hey Sal, thanks for the great video! :) But how do you apply this for a 4 by 4 or n by n matrix?
lyaskoff 2 years ago
sal do you have a fish tank?
shoyb 2 years ago
Ok I have tried this method with 2 different matrices now and it has worked for neither. It only seems to work for yours because you are using such a simple staarting matrix. I like your videos but the examples you use are far too simple. The same with the gausian method, it is much much harder with a larger numbered matrix.
Please show me how this method works for the following matrix.
2 1 -1
5 -2 1
-1 -4 3
smokethatbong 2 years ago
smokethebong: Try one more time using exactly the same method, I have done your example using khan's presented method and the result is all good. (I have checked it using calculator). You had to made some errors while computing negative numbers. There are some fractions if that cheers you up :)
Rejpi 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
mszklany 2 years ago
I don't know why, but this method seems to be easier than the Gauss-Jordan method for me. Thank you for this video!
dohpaz42 2 years ago
Matrices trigger protests in my brain.
59011 2 years ago 70
Thanks, explained it very well.
dre893 2 years ago
Why dont you use the rules of Sarrus???
TIABTS 2 years ago 2
"It will prevent my brain from degrating" That was funny :D Thanks again for your hard work, you're the modern kind of a superhero.
8dimensions 2 years ago 3
thanks a lot for this technique. I think this is less confusing than the elementary row operation.
qbanguy7 2 years ago 27
Agreed. Inverting an nxn matrix utilizing determinants is child's play compared to elementary row operation tomfoolery on this scale.
cianestro 1 year ago
@qbanguy7 explain elementary row operation to me in the comment box... lol jk
PeinItachi 1 year ago
Question: shouldn't the adjugate matrix have a 1 at row 2 column 3, instead of a -1?
CoauthoredStaircase 2 years ago
MATRICES ARE A WAR OF ATTRITION!
Zephyruu 2 years ago
thanks..that helped
shrey321 2 years ago
Comment removed
PiratesVersusNinjas 2 years ago
Comment removed
PiratesVersusNinjas 2 years ago
Comment removed
PiratesVersusNinjas 2 years ago
I multiplied them and it came out correct, Nice Work Sal!
toapeth 2 years ago
thanks man....ur a legend.....trying to figure this out for a long time.
zkuzio 2 years ago
ur a fucking legend......i spent a whole yr trying 2 figure this out....got my exam in 2 days n u finally helped me.....cheers mate.
zkuzio 2 years ago
Really great, well explained, simple !!
I've never learnt that before and following the steps with you gets my head around matrices !!!
Cheers!
vermichou 2 years ago
haha man thx i just needed a refresher for my exam...lol when u made the first matrix i was like...thats symmetric ...ur gonna get a symmetric transpose and i was thinkingg that if u had to show how to do a transpose it was gonna suck for ppl haha but nonetheless GJ
rb44 2 years ago
"It will prevent my brain from degrating" :D Yes, matrices are consuming my brain :)
DeViLiN888 2 years ago
so tedious, i hate IB for expecting us to remember all of these steps. thanks!
ddeny22 2 years ago
I <3 your voice
liyasec1 2 years ago
Great work, Sal.
Winsunn307 2 years ago
Good job ! U got it right of course, I multyplied it out and as expected it gives me the Identity matrix .nOW i UNDERSTAND WHY U DISLIKE THEM..I JUST HOPE ITS NOT GOING TO BE ON MY MIDTERM !THANX A LOT, UR GREAT !
the988 3 years ago 3
thanx ALOT :D
3807312 3 years ago
very nice, thx
riccocz 3 years ago
I love you man! That was so helpful! You just hopefully got me 6 more marks for my exam :)
51andCounting 3 years ago
at least i know it isn't me who only thinks this stuff is hard lol
jellyjam10534 3 years ago
Thanks so much... (my brain hurts now) but at least i understand it now..
killersdeat0 3 years ago
thats sorta like playing sudoku.
dejawolf 3 years ago
coo
Toharvard 3 years ago
THAT IS EXTREMELY HELPFUL! thanks! XD
XanxenigmaX 3 years ago
Only 17 minutes!!!
chopperhead2011 3 years ago
Thanks! lol I recently learned matrices in pre cal in high school!
darkwspyder 3 years ago