World Trade Center Reconstruction Site Progress Insulting Desperate Onlookers

[iGaRaai90]

barriers??? there's a 70 foot drop straight down to bed rock with out those barriers those contractors would a shit load of liability to deal with

[smokenfly514]

I just wanted to know by when the towers should be rebuilt, and how they demolished what remained of the original ones. Can anyone help? Thanks

[supebioshock]

@smokenfly514 estimated to be done in 2013

[paul14075]

google: "Israel did 9/11"

[paul14075]

google "israel did 9/11"

[Cryptome1]

Nothing I've seen supports the arguments outlined, but I'm a skeptic of assertions are not backed up with thorough information. Anything withheld that the public must take on faith, discredits any account. I know that conspiracy theories are appealing, which is why spies, scholars and faith-peddlers are so honored for outlandish bogosities.

[paul14075]

Cryptome, you're ignoring the multitude of other evidence that 9/11 was perpetrated by rogue factions of our own government. It's obvious to anyone with 2 eyes that no airliner crashed in Shanksville. The Pentagon appears to have been hit with a cruise missile. Airplane debris was planted in the streets of NYC. FEMA's lead ground-zero videographer is seeking political asylum in Argentina due to what he has seen. The FBI says it found a hijacker's passport unscathed in the WTC rubble.ADMITIT

[smokenfly514]

No airliner crashed in Shanksville??

[Cryptome1]

Part 7

There are barriers now to such open participation in developing public knowledge and confidence in what happened at WTC, crassly represented by the street barriers at the site emblazoned with sacchrine renderings, and totally misrepresented by the inexorable reconstruction of the same old banal and bloated architecture by the same old dark-sided crew.

Thank your for not snoring or snorting.

[MediaBlitzDIR]

Thank you for sharing your professional opinion as an architect. I've always suspected the real conspiracy concerning the WTC was preventing the public from learning the towers were poorly designed and structurally weak. Which begs the question "How many other U.S. sky-scrapers are similarly flawed?"

[jacktls26]

@MediaBlitzDIR what ??????? 

[MediaBlitzDIR]

@jacktls26 - What part of my prior comment confuses you?

1) my thanks to New York Architect Cryptome1 for his post

2) my suspicion that the WTC towers were poorly designed and structurally weak (like the 59-story Citicorp in NY that authorities feared would collapse duke•edu/~hpgavin/ce131/citico­rp1.htm)

[Cryptome1]

Part 6

A beneficial discussion can be had about WTC but it must be informed by more than speculation and suspicion, that is, experienced professionals and officials who have taken part in WTC investigations and are now keeping quiet must participate openly not secretly. And they will not tell what they know so long as they are threatened with "professional suicide."

Continues

[Cryptome1]

Part 5

Bear in mind that most in the architectural, engineering, construction and finance industries favor the method of excluding the public. When disasters occur as a result of this method, the response is to seal court records, settle with victims, dampen investigations by compliant commissions, and swear professionals to confidentiality -- to speak out is to "commit professional suicide" so say the wisened

Continues.

[Cryptome1]

Part 4

A consequence of this public exclusion is the rise in suspicion and paranoia about what caused the WTC collapse. NIST's voluminous study omitted crucial information about the cause of the collapse, with the expectation that stonewalling the public will work as it has in the past, under the claim that the public must not be alarmed in these terrorism-troubled times.

Continues

[Cryptome1]

Part 3

Instead, compliance with these standards was bypassed through special powers granted to the Port Authority by the States of New York and New Jersey.

The Port Authority is not alone among the nation's hundreds of special authorities established to bypass local building codes and public review. The reconstruction of WTC is utilizing the same public-interest bypassing mechanisms, which is why developers are happy to cut deals with officials who fear public review.

Continues

[Cryptome1]

Comment part 2

Design and financing energy required to prevent the collapse of the two towers is what was missing. To hold down costs of the over-sized towers, conceived for the glorification of officials, safety factors in engineering were minimized. The disintegration of the towers would not have happened if these safety factors had met building code standards at the time of construction.

Continues in part 3

[Cryptome1]

As an architect practicing in NYC for over 3 decades, I do not think the disintegration of the two towers was due to an explosive force other than that caused by the collapse of under-designed structures employing the real estate industry's legal-financial philosophy that until a disaster occurs the outer envelope of safety has not been tested.

Comment continues in part 2.

[1DashMan]

I was there yesterday, the progress is a huge question mark. I'd love to know what the actual workers make of it, anyway, if you go down there I advise taking a guided tour with the former firefighter who is based at the exhibition

[paul14075]

81% of both buildings were reduced to sub 300 micron particles.

55% of that 81% were less than 3 micron in size.

The epa states;

mass of material (> 10 x 10^6 tons) reduced to dust and smoke (introduction, P.2, L.10 )

The energy required to pulverise all that material including concrete to sub 3 micron particle size is massive and a conservative 6 million kwh are required.

TNT and thermite cannot do this alone... there was another energy source present, but CRYPTOME won't admit it.