I think the 1994 version had superior costuming. They did a lot of research on the styles, fabrics, etc. pertaining to that area of the country during the early Civil War era. Some of these dresses look a bit modern.
im supposed to read the thick book of little women because its a requirement in our school but im too lazy to read so instead im watching it=))THANK YOU YOUTUBE!!!
@princessexito well just don't mention anything about Aunt March reading Jo's book because that would give it away that you cheated. A movie adaptation usually makes a lot of changes from the original.
Um weren't they all supposed to be younger after all in the bok Amy was twelve, Beth was thirteen, Jo was fifteen and Meg was sixteen they lokk a bit old :/
jo and meg start at 15 and 16 in novel but end at 21 or 22 at novel . so you never see in any adaption of novel an actress under 20 acted as jo or meg
Wow it's so... crazy that Susan Dey is playing a girl who is supposed 2 be plain. There is nothing plain about her. 8:54 when the guy said "I hoped you'd be as plain as you look." But I like Susan as Jo, of course I didn't see the previous n new one so I have nothing to compare it to. I like this movie so far. I think they cast the rite person as Jo, but her looks don't match with her character's description.
Why is Meg being spoilt with attention over her pretty looks and Jo treated as an ugly duckling?? I think this lady Susan Dey has the face of an angel - quite possibly the prettiest casting they've ever had as Jo, though my favourite acting by far is June Allyson's.
@Ilovecats112233 Meg isn't just pretty, she's ladylike and interested in girl things. Jo may be pretty, but she's blunt-spoken and tomboyish and doesn't play the social "game" as well.
I think the 1994 version had superior costuming. They did a lot of research on the styles, fabrics, etc. pertaining to that area of the country during the early Civil War era. Some of these dresses look a bit modern.
churchmousie 5 months ago 2
im supposed to read the thick book of little women because its a requirement in our school but im too lazy to read so instead im watching it=))THANK YOU YOUTUBE!!!
princessexito 5 months ago
@princessexito well just don't mention anything about Aunt March reading Jo's book because that would give it away that you cheated. A movie adaptation usually makes a lot of changes from the original.
churchmousie 5 months ago
@churchmousie k thanks:D
princessexito 4 months ago
Um weren't they all supposed to be younger after all in the bok Amy was twelve, Beth was thirteen, Jo was fifteen and Meg was sixteen they lokk a bit old :/
nawalhaque 6 months ago 2
@nawalhaque
jo and meg start at 15 and 16 in novel but end at 21 or 22 at novel . so you never see in any adaption of novel an actress under 20 acted as jo or meg
dearashymashy2 6 months ago 2
@dearashymashy2
Ahh that makes sense :)
nawalhaque 6 months ago
I love Jo she is cool! I thought she was 12 cause she acted like it in the book lov it !
amyx188 6 months ago
I think Jo and Meg's dresses are stunning and attractive... It shows them off instead of their dresses :)
Elemiriel 6 months ago in playlist drama 3
BILLY GARDINER INVENTED THE SHAG.
hellomynameisKATiiE 8 months ago
the only reason i came here is cuz i read the book and was wondering if there is a show for it... there is... now i cant stop watching........
MultiGorri 8 months ago 3
Wow it's so... crazy that Susan Dey is playing a girl who is supposed 2 be plain. There is nothing plain about her. 8:54 when the guy said "I hoped you'd be as plain as you look." But I like Susan as Jo, of course I didn't see the previous n new one so I have nothing to compare it to. I like this movie so far. I think they cast the rite person as Jo, but her looks don't match with her character's description.
timidteen4 8 months ago
4:39 the back of her dress isn't scorched....
YellowElf13 9 months ago
@BenedictRoend yes she would. In the book, Mr. Lawrence becomes her friend. She's shy but she makes him think about his daughter who died
filipendule1 9 months ago 2
WRONG. Beth would NEVER talk at Mr. Laurence!
BenedictRoend 1 year ago 10
lol Aunt March told Jo that girls do notwaste their tmes on novels but when she left the novel auntmarch quickly read it...lol
PrincessMelody6 1 year ago 8
Why is Meg being spoilt with attention over her pretty looks and Jo treated as an ugly duckling?? I think this lady Susan Dey has the face of an angel - quite possibly the prettiest casting they've ever had as Jo, though my favourite acting by far is June Allyson's.
Ilovecats112233 1 year ago 4
@Ilovecats112233 Meg isn't just pretty, she's ladylike and interested in girl things. Jo may be pretty, but she's blunt-spoken and tomboyish and doesn't play the social "game" as well.
CassieLopez 1 year ago 2
@Ilovecats112233 i've read the book a hundred times over; Jo never cares how she looks and she relates better with boys since she's a tomboy
missyadams 1 year ago 2