Those folks that made shrek just don't get it. I bet they were thinking... "how can we fill up 2 hours of 'movie'" as if they could just dump garbage with hardly any plot, jokes worse than anything i've found in a cracker jack box, and character development that is as dramatic as an episode of barney and friends.
It's funny tho, I think I can do all the cgi scenes in the first Tron within a week. And I'm yet considered as a beginner in 3D animation. That's just so unfair !! ^^
Alias used in Jurassic park? I'm sure it was but Softimage was a huge part of that movie. This thing makes it sound like it was all Alias all the time.
Actually, Toy Story was the first full animated feature film where i forgot that those characters were just simple computer datas. No, they were absolutely alive, and heart touching not like DreamWorks's stuff, the driving on funny stories, and this is the fact why they will never beat Pixar. :)
How the hell can you not mention Ed Catmull/Pixar in this.. Toy story was the first ever fully computer animated feature. I cannot believe how biased this documentary is.
fully agree with all posts relating to the lack of content regarding Pixar, I was personally involved in the advertising of Toy Story for buisness marketing at sun microsystems. However Pixar content sadly wasnt in this particular documentry.
@FpsMuch Exactly. Dreamworks contributed nothing to innovate or revolutionize CGI and here they are, dissing Tron and not even mentioning Toy Story. Toy Story is million times better than Shrek.
Agreed, Toy Story was the first and broke new ground in every respect, and definately ought to have been included as a major contributer for this doc. Shrek did experiment with many new techniques that had not been established prior, ie fluid, flame and cloth dynamics. Im guessing discovery channel has links with Dreamworks or Pixar didnt wish to contribute, being they released their own full length production. Pixar the story.
hm.. the guys behind pixar invented a lot of the methods used for both 2d and 3d animation, and they werent even mentioned? ..this docu is severely biased,
my first 3d animation was done on an amiga but just to render 1 frame took like 20mins later got a sgi indy which was top end stuff at the time wavefront was advanced for the time too but again took like 3 days to render a 5min clip heh,,much faster these days although theres a lack of quality i think is more cartoony now
I don't understand why people thought TRON was a story-telling failure. My own explanation is that people just didn't get it. The whole movie was about ambition. The whole story and production embodied that same ethos.
TRON was actually a great movie. People just didn't "get it" back then because no body knew the lingo. I was 11 when TRON hit the screen and I totally "got it" because at that time I was programming the ATARI with its PLAYER MISSILE GRAPHICS (aka SPRITES) in machine language. In other words, TRON was 10 to 15 years ahead with its story line.
How can anyone even THINK onf making a "history of computer animation" without noting LucasArts, Pixar and Renderman?
Shrek was no damn milestone in CA. In fact compared to Monster Inc. (launched the same year) it was pretty weak attempt to make computer animated film. It's CGI was at least 2-3 years behind Pixar.
6:37 :D
DasMegaUltra 3 months ago in playlist Weitere Videos von Neuroplasm
The audio loses sync pretty early on.
Jerakal 4 months ago
Those folks that made shrek just don't get it. I bet they were thinking... "how can we fill up 2 hours of 'movie'" as if they could just dump garbage with hardly any plot, jokes worse than anything i've found in a cracker jack box, and character development that is as dramatic as an episode of barney and friends.
jaymorpheus11 7 months ago
one hundred million hours to render?? That's over TEN THOUSAND YEARS....Am i hearing this right??
karama8484 7 months ago 4
It's funny tho, I think I can do all the cgi scenes in the first Tron within a week. And I'm yet considered as a beginner in 3D animation. That's just so unfair !! ^^
zelexboy 8 months ago
actually, softimage was used for t2 and jurassic park. the discovery people should do their research...
moeljayer 10 months ago
Were they using Nt.3.51 for Shrek?
TVperson1 11 months ago
I like how when people talk in this its out of sync
Lastoneremains 1 year ago
Can you PM me link to this documentary.Audio is not sync with video. :(
BranislavDJ 1 year ago
now in a few days i can make a realistic render of a spacecraft in its environment....using google and piratebay as tools for my know how
chevezez 1 year ago
Alias used in Jurassic park? I'm sure it was but Softimage was a huge part of that movie. This thing makes it sound like it was all Alias all the time.
inkswithbrush 1 year ago
haha, i cant believe we all thought they look real back then, looking back at past video games, it all looks so fake
adrianlindsaylohan 1 year ago
Actually, Toy Story was the first full animated feature film where i forgot that those characters were just simple computer datas. No, they were absolutely alive, and heart touching not like DreamWorks's stuff, the driving on funny stories, and this is the fact why they will never beat Pixar. :)
foryou835 1 year ago
6:35 That was pure nightmare fuel.
desu38 1 year ago
Comment removed
mycollegeshirt 1 year ago
How the hell can you not mention Ed Catmull/Pixar in this.. Toy story was the first ever fully computer animated feature. I cannot believe how biased this documentary is.
lakini1103 1 year ago 10
@lakini1103
fully agree with all posts relating to the lack of content regarding Pixar, I was personally involved in the advertising of Toy Story for buisness marketing at sun microsystems. However Pixar content sadly wasnt in this particular documentry.
Neuroplasm 1 year ago 4
@lakini1103
True, how odd this documentary only mentioned Dreamworks. Dreamworks wasn't even born when Pixar's Toy Story wrote the history of computer animation.
karmaXdrama 11 months ago
LAGGY VIDEO!
RICKROLLBLENDER 1 year ago
The end was sooo hinting at CGI Pornography! lol
AtarashiiKira 1 year ago
Dreamworks sucks :|. Every movie has to do with an animal with a crooked smile or some other unfunny joke.
Sticky1254 1 year ago
tron was awesome!
tandjcoffing 1 year ago
tron is so awesome
silvastomp 1 year ago
Yeah, bash Tron, Dreamworks, dorks, will ya! Let me tell ya, though, Shrek SUCKED ! And Tron was awesome.
Spermagram 1 year ago
no mention about Softimage? 3D Studio? Montreal?
fcycles 1 year ago
4 Million for CGI movie... Nowadays it's like hundred of millions of dollars.
zombieiscool 2 years ago
@zombieiscool yeaa man.. avatar cost 500 million aparently, not sure how much of that went to the CGI effects.. i'm guessing alot tho
DomWogboy 2 years ago
I heard it was officially $237 million dollars to make it, and $150 million dollars for advertising.
Might of been like $310 million for making it and $150 for advertising.
Usul573 1 year ago
I always found computer animation creepy. Look at 6:36 for instance.
nek0me0w 2 years ago
Whoops. Typed this on the wrong profile.
memphiselle 2 years ago
I plan to work with CG in the future as a film producer! I am SUPER excited about the future of CG! I can combine live action and CG SEEMLESSLY!
Littledude514 2 years ago
Why does the narrator add an r to the end of words? Like in drawing-r, Sega-r? Does he need a speech therapist?
Jspeterson 2 years ago
great posting - nice job of editing too
Hoogliette 2 years ago
terminator 2 & jurassic park is the best
debsirin33298 2 years ago 4
Tron was made by four CG companies, not six animators.
philipnova798 2 years ago
wtf shrek broke through? MY ASS.
toy story was the first fully generated film! BY PIXAR! and it was realistic! wtf is this shit with dreamworks! im pissed :(
FpsMuch 2 years ago 29
dont forget the SMALL SOLDIERS>..!!...
jayblueridgesumilhig 2 years ago 3
I agree. Dreamworks was years behind Pixar. Not only that, Pixar has a much bigger history of blockbusters.
twebb72 2 years ago
@FpsMuch Exactly. Dreamworks contributed nothing to innovate or revolutionize CGI and here they are, dissing Tron and not even mentioning Toy Story. Toy Story is million times better than Shrek.
Spermagram 1 year ago
@FpsMuch
Agreed, Toy Story was the first and broke new ground in every respect, and definately ought to have been included as a major contributer for this doc. Shrek did experiment with many new techniques that had not been established prior, ie fluid, flame and cloth dynamics. Im guessing discovery channel has links with Dreamworks or Pixar didnt wish to contribute, being they released their own full length production. Pixar the story.
Neuroplasm 1 year ago 5
@FpsMuch agreed
crazyivan030983 1 year ago
@FpsMuch I like how they ignore Pixar. Bloody mac people.
TVperson1 11 months ago
If you do the research pixar wins almost all the computer animation awards
PIXAR IS #1 dreamworks is a credit stealing company
rrangel1995 2 years ago 2
This documentary is a bunch of bullshit
I agree with athr0x.
Dreamworks is company that is trying to take Pixar's credict for being revolutionary and innovative
look at The Pixar Story documentary which is the true story of computer animation
also if you look closely at this, the only people being interviewed are from dreamworks and nobody is from pixar
rrangel1995 2 years ago 5
and.. oh.. didn't the final fantasy 7 cutscenes and the movies come before shrek? those humans were a lot more livelike
athr0x 2 years ago 3
hm.. the guys behind pixar invented a lot of the methods used for both 2d and 3d animation, and they werent even mentioned? ..this docu is severely biased,
athr0x 2 years ago 15
@athr0x
biased to who, I just thing its dumbed down and misinformed beyond belief
rollokb2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com
kodykodyoneill 2 years ago
CGI has already reached its limits wherein "There are no more limits"..xD
blssdfall27 2 years ago
my first 3d animation was done on an amiga but just to render 1 frame took like 20mins later got a sgi indy which was top end stuff at the time wavefront was advanced for the time too but again took like 3 days to render a 5min clip heh,,much faster these days although theres a lack of quality i think is more cartoony now
buzzjunked 2 years ago
I don't understand why people thought TRON was a story-telling failure. My own explanation is that people just didn't get it. The whole movie was about ambition. The whole story and production embodied that same ethos.
vapourmile 2 years ago
WTF why did Ryan get an Oscar?! What is so SPECIAL about it? Enlighten me please!
feelthefears 2 years ago
Games now out strip the movie industry 8:26
bigsky780 2 years ago
Cool.
SonAvitch 3 years ago
TRON was actually a great movie. People just didn't "get it" back then because no body knew the lingo. I was 11 when TRON hit the screen and I totally "got it" because at that time I was programming the ATARI with its PLAYER MISSILE GRAPHICS (aka SPRITES) in machine language. In other words, TRON was 10 to 15 years ahead with its story line.
mefreakshow 3 years ago
arent you great
BobCassidy 2 years ago
Autodesk now bought MAYA in 2006 and later on 3D MAX, MUDBOX, ETC....
mik987 3 years ago
Wow, Pixar got a bit shafted there eh?
Boyinabox 3 years ago 4
"Ryan" is a great film. Everyone should go see it.
SSCrow 3 years ago
wow, i never new maya was so old
polopnol 3 years ago
How can anyone even THINK onf making a "history of computer animation" without noting LucasArts, Pixar and Renderman?
Shrek was no damn milestone in CA. In fact compared to Monster Inc. (launched the same year) it was pretty weak attempt to make computer animated film. It's CGI was at least 2-3 years behind Pixar.
ipiloot 3 years ago
is this payed by dreamworks? no mention to Pixar, no mention to Toy Story, come on!
poeteapau 3 years ago 5
It's a couple seconds out of sync.
But at least it doesn't show people talking alot.
sonicmonkey123 3 years ago
Realtime > Pre-Rendered
Jumpseri 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sir, you fail.
QuantumCarl 3 years ago
I always wanted to see something like this documentary :P
<3 it
5/5
Dk69pt 3 years ago 4