Added: 5 years ago
From: vexed123
Views: 739,832
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (824)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Is it the 2K22M Tunguska-M1 in the same family of the PANTSIR S1? Perhaps the question sounds a little silly, but I was wondering if they are--in essence--the same thing with only small variation.

  • is it better than the german gepard?

  • Tunguska-M1 like a boss in BF3

  • @cakapberak HAHA!! Iwas in a game (in the tunguska on noshahr canals) and they couldn't get past me :P:P the Whole fucking team quitted :(

  • BATTLEFIELD 3!!!!!

  • like if you here coz of battlefield 3

  • This is why in Independence Day movie the aliens dont invade Russia lol

  • I'm unstoppable with this thing in battlefield

  • its not m1 its old model 2s6

  • Unstoppable in BF3

  • ez jo lesz

  • LOVE this thing on BF3...

  • @Sutta92 me 2

  • Для вас пиндосы ничего не жалко

  • i still do not understand why people are afraid of zombie apocalypse when we have such weapons....

  • HATE this thing on BF3...

  • Soviet - not a Russian.

  • I love the fact that when this thing shoots, fire comes out of both ends!

  • янки бойтись

  • anti A-10 and Apache

  • In Russia, this weapon is only available on video

  • this is those shit from Crysis I when u shot in that spider fuck near end of the game

  • Its only a copy of the German flakpanzer Gepard

  • @RealMorphois

    nein es ist leider andersherum. der gepard ist die kopie ;)

  • @natsplit das halte ich für eine kühne Behauptung.

  • @MrElpraesidente

    Das ist Fakt. Der Gepard wurde als Reaktion zur Schilka gebaut, welche mehr als 10 Jahre früher entwickelt wurde. Tunguska ist lediglich eine Weiterentwicklung davon.

    Außerdem hat Gepard keine Luftabwehrraketen. Generell ist das Tunguska System weit leistungsfähiger.

  • @natsplit Die shilka hat auf dem Turm eine Vierlingsflak 4x23mm. Während der Gepard 2x35mm Geschütze hat. Völlig anderes Konzept. Der Tunguska (2x30mm) wurde erst 1986 in Dienst gestellt. Der Gepard wurde 1973 in Dienst gestellt.

    Der Gepard hatte auch ein ganz anderes Einsatzprofil. Für Luftabwehrraketen gibts das System Roland.

    Ob der Tunguska leistungsfähiger ist kann ich nicht sagen. Sein wir mal ehrlich sind beides geile Geräte und es sind beides Flakpanzer. Beide schießen in die Luft.

  • @MrElpraesidente

    Mir sind die Unterschiede schon bewusst, aber auch wenn der Gepard ein anders Kaliber hat orientier er sich vom Konzept her deutlich an Shilka.

    Sowohl Roland, Gepard und Tunguska haben eigentlich das gleiche Einsatzprofil. Luftverteidigung im Nahbereich.

    Wobei Tunguska in etwas das leistet, was Roland und Gepard zusammen erbringen.

  • @natsplit  natürlich orientiert sich das Konzept an Shilka. Es sind Flakpanzer. Dann kannste auch sagen die shilka orientiert sich an den Wirbelwind aus WW2.

  • @MrElpraesidente

    Das mein ich doch nicht. Die radargestüzte Zielerfassung bei der Shilka war damals ein deutlicher Sprung nach vorne.

  • @natsplit Das es ein Sprung nach vorne war bestreite ich nicht, allerdings benutzt der Gepard ein ganz anderen Leitstand mit Folgeradar und Laserentfernungsmesser.

  • Comment removed

  • @RealMorphois no the gepard is the copy xDDD

  • Love it!

  • fuckin' OP in BF3

  • @TheSweata71

    I love raping landing parties on Nashier Canal. Literally impossible to get those M-cons. Of course, i wouldn't say it's OP since, in reality, it fucks shit up that hard.

  • This AA brings pain & misery to many pilots in BF3 :X

  • lav-ad is good but

    tunguska in aa work is better have 30mm gun and lav 25mm

    and tunguska-m1 have better gun

    gtling gun is no adapted to long time shot

    and aa missile .........last 2006 57e6 sa-22 lol is much better than stinger

    stinger is small personnal aa missile

  • russia makes some bad ass anti air machines no question about it.

  • @animalmother4 yeah and the US makes some bad ass radar seeking munitions. HA HA

  • @Thespeakerofmanytru8 F-117 wasn't a match for S-125 NEVA :)

  • @totalmalfunction Mmmmm I think there was a bit more to that then meets the eye, I believe they had set up an incredibly intricate method of tracking using cell phone masts' burst transmissions. It was a technical achivement but it would require a massive and impractical building of cell phone style towers over a vast area.

  • Regalemos uno a mi país anden si??

  • Dear Santa....

  • If you have this - no chance for Sarkozys terror-jets.

  • And please go on thinking that :)

  • AWESOME! Russians build the most wicked weapons!

  • @deathratrald

    Search for "Flugabwehrpanzer Gepard" and You will see the original...real action starts at 1:38....And Gepard is an older one...based on the Leopard technology...

  • @tausendstein ZSU-23-4 Shilka was developed earlear then Gepard

  • @deathratrald wrong

  • Russia Rules ! ^^

  • aw, they still use guns, how cute

  • Fuck off NATO

  • @Morbid2410 Haha! Too bad NATO actually builds good tanks.

  • @Tyco200 , nato is shit

  • @Tyco200 ,such as which tanks? and in general why such an aggressive organization of NATO??

  • @Morbid2410 craprams and sherman xD

  • Cool, but why do Russian tanks have those giant radars on them. They are 1/5 of the size of the tanks.

  • @livingdream1234 to see the enemy from a large distance I think...

  • its from battlefield 2)

  • I love Russian unique brain for deadly toys

  • ALWAYS RUSSIA CLAIMS THAT "WE ARE BETTER THAN YOU".. BUT YOU STILL CANT BEAT A FEW CHECENS IN CHECHNYA .. YOU LOSER RUSSIANS.. YOU WILL NEVER CHANGE..

  • @dengeyoook please man Chechen repulic is a pert of Russian federation,its new rebuilding republic,very happy,so please tell me:))) were is US happy war end:)))

  • @SlavaSvarogu chechen repuclic is a part of russia? lololololol :))))

  • @dengeyoook Yes part of Russian federation ,use wikipedia

  • @SlavaSvarogu thats why you are still fighting in chechenia.. :))

  • @dengeyoook Shut up troll!

  • A-10 Warthog:Tunguska offiser says:"Help mama"

  • oh man this is just a bad copy of the german AA-tank gepard,cme on...and its crappy btw

  • dear santa...

  • @qualmimero82 better u ask santa for the german gepard

  • мне нравится как она срет патронами. Круче чем шилка

  • Слава Руси!

  • The editor is implying that mission impossible for any aircraft that pass above Tunguska :-)

  • lol what type of ammo is it shooting?

  • ЖЕСТЬ!!!+

  • american music over russian military video :P hahahahahah

  • @alizgraphikz  Retarded americans being retarded as always. This soundtrace were made by a guy from Argentine. If you look into it, half of the shit you think are american - actually isnt.

  • @1TtidnaB thanks dumbass for your shitty info

  • @alizgraphikz ha ha you got owned there!

  • @alizgraphikz Dont hate on me, its not my fault you are as knowledgeable as a european 4yr old.

  • Respect from Serbia !!! Braco nasa do smrti smo zajedno !!! ORTODOX BROTHERS!

  • Actually the a-10 was designed to survive anything up to 23mm. Hence why this thing spits out 30mm..

  • I heard some countries have new class rockets. LG = Land to God. To shoot down... oh you know who.

  • ît have same charackter then german "gepard"

    Its Rapid in firerats and speed, gun tower

    greetings from germany

  • I suspect an A-10 pilot would call these "targets"

  • @Hiwatcher1 An A-10 pilot would be good staying away from anything like this. The A-10 wasn't designed to take hits from 30mm cannons

  • @Azyashi That is if the 30mm shells can hit it in the first place, and even then an A-10 is built to withstand a few cannon calibers. The cannon armament on the Tunguska would mostly be used to take out low flying helicopters, its the missile that would be used to take down a high flying fix-wing like the A-10.

    Ground air defense is always vulnerable against ground-attack aircraft these days, they really should come up with something new, like a stealth-version of the Tunguska.

  • @kovona the a10 flys way lower then any other american fixed wing aircraft

  • @101andrewj Doesn't matter, its still hard to hit with gun projectiles. This isn't the second world war anymore, you don't wait for a ground strike aircraft loaded with air-to-surface missiles to get close enough before engaging with short range cannon armament. If you have a SAM, use it.

    The cannon armament on the Tungaska is specifically used for killing enemy helicopters, because most people don't know that helicopters actually have a high chances of outmaneuvering guided AA missiles.

  • @kovona its cannon is for helicopters AND low flying fixed wing aircraft, like the A10...

  • @101andrewj The Tunguska will be dead with a Maverick up its ass before it gets to use the damn cannon. Unless it keeps its radar off, well hidden under camouflage netting, its operator in tune with a grid of visual spotters to help him pinpoint the aircraft because his radars off, have his radar on and tracking moments before the A-10 enters its engagement envelope of a two-three miles max, then finally shoot the damn A-10 before it destroys the objective the 2K22M was suppose to be defending.

  • @kovona I don't think the A-10 is designed to go after AA guns or batteries.

    Besides AA units work as an integrated network, at least in countries like Russia or USA.

    The M1 has a missile range of 10KM which is not too bad, versus the Maverick 28 KM, but the Maverick is still a subsonic missile, so there is a change the M1 can shoot it down. Anyway, you are making it way too simple for one Thunderbolt to go after 1 Tunguska.

  • @vexed123 It still won't use the cannon first when engaging fixed wing. The operator will always use the missile if it has it when engaging fix-wing like the A-10. If you were hunting a lion, will you use a short-range throwing spear or a long range rifle? A 30mm cannon is a short range weapon in terms of anti-aircraft armament. Its a last line of defence, if enemy aircraft were able to break through/evade your umbrella network of long/medium SAM and they're right on top of your ground assets.

  • @kovona You are in LALA land. A-10 is not designed for that.

  • @Hatinonthehaters So I assume you think it was designed for flying around the theatre unarmed and asking to be shot down. Really intuitive.

  • 0:32, whoa! Shame there is no actual audio.

  • En el Perú necesitamos los tunguska,los shilkas regasenlos a los boys scoot para que cazen patos.La guerra no es un juego si no te apertrechas con lo mejor, pierdes.Lo mismo en toda tipo de armas.-actualizar.Viva nuestras FFAA.-Viva el Perú--A los chilenos racistas y soberbios demosle por el chico.Hay que hacerlos felices.-nos van a querer..

  • i remember when i was destroying those in eurofighter typhoon. dozens of them!!

  • This thing costs more than two Abrams....

  • Good Job......

  • Dear Russians, would you borrow me this just for one day... I have to visit some people ;)

  • Hey russian why your AA guns do not help our libyans brothers to kill some OTAN planes, it is something wrong with the guns you sell to others countries????

  • you know you have some powerful guns when they rock a tank back and shoot casings like confetti launchers :D

  • So what? We have Lady Gaga and The iPhone....America wins

  • this is why we never seen Santa...

  • I bet Kadafi wishes he had a few of those right now.

  • @BlueStateChronicle they'd get rammed up the cruise missile up their ass on short notice

  • @BlueStateChronicle Gadaffi he lols at the amount of people that can't spell his name right.

  • @Saulscmit I'm afraid to say it is spelled phonetically, therefore has multiple spellings. Most names and place names in MENA and Arabic countries are like this. Gadaffi, Qadaffi, Kadaffi.. all are right! If you remember when his right hand man defected to the UK, some sources spelled it Musa Kusa, some spelled it 'Mousse Kousse'... It doesn't matter, both are right...

  • @BlueStateChronicle he did have a small amount of the first generation tunguskas, i believe the compound they were in was among the first targets hit by NATO stealth aircraft before the conventional air war

  • @BlueStateChronicle wad about Stalin?

  • @BlueStateChronicle He cant afford em, they are about 16 mil a pop ;D

  • @BlueStateChronicle me to)) from Russia witl love, понимаешь)

  • @BlueStateChronicle its Gadafi not kadafi :D

  • @HrvatskitDomoljub Actually no one knows the correct spelling... His name has no official translation from arabic, it has been found spelled differently in the media from countries all over the world in more than 100 different ways.

  • @TheC4Guy -------- officially its Qaddafi >> Arabic pronunciation is " Katha-fee " in some media they say Kaddafi or Gaddafi which is wrong but it works .

  • @TheC4Guy Rebels found a diplomatic passport belonging to one of his sons. The name was written 'Gathafi'. there is a video on it here on youtube (search "Mohamed Al-Gaddafi's Passport". Cannot post a direct link.

  • that tank looks brutal

  • dear santa...

  • lol mission impossible music fails -_-

  • holly crap wats the ROF on that thing?

  • @woody000555 It is about 3 900 to 5 000 rounds/min.

  • The Russians make AAA look cool... still they look like the little toy AFV that Godzilla used to stomp in Japan.

  • very good,

  • nice gun, but "mission impossible" back sound? why?

  • niceeeeeeeee

    

  • 0:32-0:33

  • OH and by the way this is coming from a 14 years old kid.

  • Like @TheKarriem said about the three wars that america started(and the 4th now in Libia) the american goverment always says something like ......we are just protecting our homeland , but wtf where they protecting on Vietnam , or Afganistan , Irak , or when they bombed Serbia .

    that had nothing to do with us safety , the american goverment has always its own interest in something , not freaking peace for gods sake .

  • It is decided !

    I trade my VW POLO for that beast LOL

  • Almost as good as sliced bread

  • its a good system for AA i give it that its dam effective and brutal. But againts USAF 6Gen Aircraft like the B-2 Spirit witch is almost undetectable this aint worth the dirt its driven on

  • @nardyman8501 Russians didn't make this think to shot down b2 bomber.. S 400 is made for that so B2 won't be able to come closer to this think. Tunguska is used to support infantry and armored units on the field...

    Greetings!

  • @Putin34000 No, the Tunguska is used to shoot down low-flying bombers, transport aircraft, and support infantry.

  • @nardyman8501 It is use to provide air cover for tactical column. Their target is not B2, but A-10 or AH-64.

  • These guns are good protection against missiles heading to tunguska.. So there is only one way to destroy it. You must wait the moment when he must reload.. :D

    Great system.... I think Pantsir s is better.

  • no more ufo above russia territory lol

  • @listentome1986

    Best comment ever.

    +1 internets.

  • @m1up thx it is

  • @listentome1986 I live a long time in Russia is nothing suspicious had not seen for 10 years, previously lived in Germany where in the sky were all sorts of weird things. 8D

  • @listentome1986

    At least you do mot hate Russia

  • imagine 2 or 3 of these on riot control... oh god yes

  • Russia has #1 Ground Army&a shit Navy! Air? 40yrs behindUS. F22=1979 tech. PAKFA=pretty plan,capability most dubious.Rs stole stealth from crashed F117 pieces.Obsolete since 80.B2,X45,X48,antigravity,cham­eleonCamo,SR71as launchplatform,Mach5,supercrui­se,plasmapropulsion,Cormorant,­polecat,nanotech,netcentric strat.,combat experienced force,etc.etc.etc!

  • @newmanfrigan You wrong about russian navy and air technologies.

  • lmao wouldn't want to be a hostile aircraft flying past that convoy xD

  • Is it just me, or the radar unit is based on MT-LB?

  • The name "tunguska" sure brings fear...

    

  • I'd love to see this baby firing non-stop at US soldiers.

    Hmmmmmm......appetising.

  • @USisfuckedup

    Экий долбоёб редкостный. Во всех роликах уже насрал.

  • @USisfuckedup What is wrong with you? Why so much hatred? Where are you from?

  • All governments do the same.I hate US Fascist Aggression,but all Countries become bloodthirsty,imperial,greedy&a­rrogant at some stage.USSR was arguably the worst.Napoleon;Hitler of his age.British Empire built on corpses, BelgianCongo,Balkans,SpanishCi­vilWar.In50yrs many will wax nostalgic4 US power,as Chinas Hegemony.Green Tech is the key, but no chance if US,Russia,Chinese,Indian all FIGHT CorporateFascist Stealth Dictatorship. and the Revolution is ON NOW!

  • @USisfuckedup I find this to be very disrespectful. I mean i do understand to an extent but you cannot blame any american soilder for what orders they must follow. Why because you problably have no clue what you are talking about i proudly serve this country and will do what i have to, to protect my family and probably your ass so before you start to disrespect people please get your facts striaght.

  • @TheKarriem eh... why can't you blame american soldier for following orders? as i understand everyone in the u.s. military has volunteered for it.

    it's rather naive to start ranting about protecting families when the current 2 wars have nothing to do with the security of your family or countrymen.

    next you will be saying something retarded like "we're fighting for your freedoms" i hope i don't have to explain how idiotic that phrase sounds.

  • @USisfuckedup where are you from?

  • @USisfuckedup So the russians who invaded Afghanistan were fucking assholes...and despicable and stupid

  • @arveduilastking Russians who invaded Agfhanistan had a very good reason to do so. They were CALLED by the afghani govenrment to help establish order because those despicable pakistani and fuckers saudis togehter with CIA organised and established taliban to attack and destroy the country. After the russians achieved a tactical victory they withdrew and left afghanistan. Same happend in cechnia again CIA and saudis supportinng islamic terrorists.

  • @USisfuckedup

    It's nice to see some common sense for once, instead of all those gung-ho crewcuts that watches this clip just to jerk off.

  • @USisfuckedup Soviet soldiers in Afghnistan were stupid, what about Chechnya? tupoy pridurok

  • @krazzed101 30 kill death ratio per soldier is pretty good lol

  • @USisfuckedup I agree with you, everybody has the god given right to defend his home, family and country. Whoever goes and invades antoher country just because some dispicaple government fucker ordered them to go and murder innocent people and wage war so that some company in US could earn extra couple of millions profit is a criminal and should be executed as he is not worth to be a human being. Those governments are corrupt and criminal they do not serve the people they serve themselves.

  • @USisfuckedup i agree 100% go go talibans!

  • @USisfuckedup Awesome comment ! very well said.

  • @USisfuckedup You can't blame the soldiers, following orders is simply their job and always was since even a hundred years ago. Blame the one at the top of the chain hes responsible.

  • @USisfuckedup

    If our USA goverment for last 10years would talk in diplomatic language not by force and power

    USA my beloved country will at least 5 times more powerful than we right now

    We always in war !

    this is simply destroy all that previos USA generations did build working hard

    Now we spending what our grand grand mothers and fathers safe to make USA the BEST

    Sorry I feel bad about that

  • @USisfuckedup We don't give a damn about your "respect". Destroy our buildings, make war upon our friends, we will fuck up the offending country, Two if necessary. If you invite war, we got some for ya.

  • @USisfuckedup what the fuck is wrong with you asshole?

  • i cant keep my eyes of that god dam radar spinning thing...

  • I'd really like to buy one of these. I went to a place that said "MILITARY LOANS" but they wouldn't loan me any money. Donations needed please.

  • Да здравствует матери России

  • you don't wanna mess with this baby

  • very reliable & deadly system ! I think the target isn't happy.....

    greetings to Russia from Italy

  • whats the song

  • @YapLee1314 Mission impossible theme performed by U2

    

  • @bhaskarbrahma2000 Thanks:)

  • Russian army............ xtreme!!!!

  •  Thats really is a kick ass war machine my friends. WOW.......fantastic.