The universe, that's our word for this incredible place. Questions that's we search for like when this all started? How big is it?(that's what she said), when will it end & how?
there are always a fight between theists and atheists........am an atheists
if they(theists) really stick or eager to worship god then why they depend on things which are made by scientists........never go to the hospital even in emergency............
never use vehicles ............i think they have been hypnotising since their childhood that there is no reason only god have done this...............so every time when they can't know the cause they think that "god must have done it".......
i can tell you just how life was made the opposite of nothing is everything and the bible says there's a time for everything and every activity one thing that is a part of everything is seperation the past travels behind us and the present travels ahead of the past so they are opposites that when time ticks it mirrors the past with the opposite therefore nothing being past becomes something being present watch my video on creation i know way more
@ahmedofa By using your logic, that it must be a thing, must have been created by someone, and must have existed somewhere, then tell me this. Who created God?
@timelordthetrain first off all You have to know that God do not have a Body but He Created things and give these things a body... Your Question in Who creates God... means that u r 100% confused that who creates the Universe and you sure that its cant creates itself..... so thats the Answer of your Question Some One Must Creates These That and That Is God...... You Should kept this n mind that God bless a limited knowledge to the man
@stunningpakistani You made no sense and you put words in my mouth. I know that the Universe created its self, and there is no God. You never really answered question. You just said that God created the Universe, never told me where God came from.
@2qewl4u You don't need a creator to create the universe. Cosmologists have seen mini solar systems being created by mini big bangs, all the time. When I say mini I mean in comparison to us they are actually rather huge. But religion was created when man wanted to know how we got here and all that. Every ancient civilization had a God but different to each other, which to me seems obvious that all other religions are made up by man. We have science now to explain things. Religion is unnecessary
Can you make a version of this video where it repeats for about 2 hours? That's how many times I watched it. Thanks! Mind blowing, and all probably true!
@MultiqProductions How do you think it happened then? It has to have been created by someone. It can't have just appeared. Neither I nor anyone else can explain it because as you have seen compared to all these creations we're just mere human beings, our level of intelligence will never reach that of the creator.
@2qewl4u No one I know can explain infinity. Which has to be true since no one can explain what's supposedly outside the Universe. Which there has to be since no one can explain infinity. What you're doing is what people did in the stone age and medieval times.. You can't think of a solution, so "God must have done it." Back when no one could possibly grasp what a star was, it was "put there by God", that goes for pretty much everything in human history, until it's proven completely natural.
@2qewl4u To give you an analogy. In 1349, over 2000 Jews were burnt to death by fundamentalist Christians to please God. This was a result of the Black Death that killed over half of Europe's population. As it was an invisible killer was deemed impossible, the clergy though, it is absolutely impossible that this wasn't caused by God himself as a wrath on human kind. We know today, that this invisible killer was bubonic plague, which thanks to science is easily cured in a few days by penicillin.
So, how did you tell stakeholders the relation between the universe and Oracle? That the universe is less prone to inconsistency? That your Oracle DB's keep expanding and there is no way to stop it?
aside from being completely untestable, the braneworld theory for the start of the universe presents alot more problems than the more widely accepted big bang followed by inflation theories.
Those parallel rectangle boxes,where they meant to be parallel Universes? Funny,we already live in a parallel universe,its called our mind.There is no parallel universe apart from this universe,its all part of one generalized magnetic field,there is no action,no pure or spontaneous action,there is only reactions to one another like domino's,So there is no doer or traveler and no time.There is no entity that is gauging anything, there is no single mind, just one world mind from which we borrow.
karthiksoun, could you ellaborate on the above statement in a PM to me? even though right now i dissagree with some of what you say, i find it interesting. maybe i dont dissagree as so much as i dont fuly understand what you meant.
This post is contradictory. If there are no parallel universes the very beginning of our universe would have to be spontaneous.
Although its hard to talk about spontaneous events if very existence of time might be only the property of this universe. Therefore terms like event, spontaneous, action->reaction concept etc. may be useless outside our universe, because they only apply if there's a flow of time .
in wat way was it contridictory? Ask anyone of ur harvard, cambridge scientists to prove to me thr is any such thing as pure action or spontenious action and i would pay thm a million dollors. Like u.g.krishnmurti says thr is no action in anything..
There is no parallel universe apart from this universe,its all part of one generalized magnetic field,there is no action,no pure or spontaneous action
In my response there were two main points:
1. If there are no other universes what would cause the beginning of our universe.
2. To talk about action and reaction there is one requirement -> The time flow, which may be only the property of our universe. Therefore it might not apply outside it.
1.Again your stuck in linear terms, thr is no strait line through infinity, everything is cyclic.. The beginning is the coming of a new end.
Like Richard Dawinks says there is no matter, beyond the atoms, nucleus, quarks what is left is nothing. Matter is like throwing a pebble on a still pond,waves appear, its a disturbance.Same way the energy in the universe is disturbed, matter appears.
2. If thr is no action thn thr is no time, if thr no center thr is no circumference.
however, if time is shared and leaked throughout all universes, like gravity from the 11th dimension, then all things would be fundamentally similar (in the sense that we all percieve the flow of time) then again, all perceptions of time may be different. such as the idea that time is just an ocean that covers everything and has no beginning or end. we humans see time as a straight path waiting to be filled in, while other beings might see it as a path that is already filled in.
uhm... do you have any evidence, or any math that even remotely suggests this? And I wont even begin to pick apart the contradictions in your statement...
@KarthikSoun Proof of these statements? If there are numerous galaxies, why not numerous universes? There have to be other dimensions/universes. It only makes complete sense. Of course, only if you actually understand physics - which you clearly don't - since you dismiss the idea as a child dismisses foreign concepts.
@Sviolinist Physics does not include personal attacks only religion does that, unless ur makeing physics into an religion whose theories cant be challanged. Physics is meant to be challenged all the time or it wont be science. So i dont think u understand the nature of science. May be u should be a Mulla in a Mosque.
Even if there where parallel dimensions i dont see how its another universe! Infinity does not mean two.There is only one and thats the nature of infinity.
O tal vez existimos como el eco resultante de otro universo, que a su vez esta dentro de otro y asi sucesivamente, quiza nuestra unica frontera limitante sea el tiempo, puesto que el espacio podria ser finito e infinito al mismo tiempo.
@efergarmx How do you think humans came to existence? The delicate organs and systems in your body. You think an explosion did that? sorry but that's just retarded. We will never know how God created us as our level of intelligence will never reach his. If we keep thinking about how we were made, when the world started, how God came we'll simply go crazy.
@2qewl4u No one has ever claimed that an explosions created our organs. To understand macro-evolution, you have to be able to grasp the concept of "a billion years", if you can, it's fairly easy. If you can't grasp that concept, without coming to terms with how long that truly is (and I can't fully myself either), you'll be left believing that evolution means a monkey can spontaneously evolve into a human. It's very easy to not understand something and say "oh God must have done it!"
@2qewl4u My point is: The fact that we don't know yet, or may never know, does in no way shape or form mean that God is responsible for it. As humans, we constantly feel the need to explain the unknown, this is the reason that both religion and science exist. Religion as an excuse, and science as a method.
@jwh30385 Science (in particular astronomy and cosmology) has fascinated me since a very young age. It is our tool for understanding the Universe that surrounds us. I do believe, however, that religion and spirituality holds a value for humanity. They fill a niche in human society, helping people face problems in life and benefit through the guidance of moral values. Science and religion (in its broadest meaning) are not mutually exclusive, as many are led to believe.
@CarlosMarti123 I agree that spirituality helps a lot of people, and that it is not necessarily mutually exclusive with science. My point is, I think it is too easy for people to simply say "God did it" whenever science hasn't been able to explain something yet. Spirituality is part of humanity, and the backbone of cultures and civilizations, and it would be sad to see it all go. However, it can also be very destructive, and when it does clash with science, it can be dangerous.
@jwh30385 You are right, though it does not happen with all spiritual beliefs, and it would be unjust to make such a generalization. Most of the time, these are caused by extremists or power-seekers trying to justify their own actions. The realms of religion and science in themselves are clearly marked off from each other. The problem comes when one tries to deny unquestionable scientific evidence with unreasonable faith, thus effectively isolating themselves from the reality around them.
la teoria de que los universos existen separados unos de otros como paredes afiladas en un espacio mayor o omniverso es interesante, tan pausible de su posibilidad como que seamos el resultado de los vestigios de universos anteriores mas grandes y vitales que al morir convierten el resto de su energia agonica en espamos de creacion que permitan la creacion de nuevos universos como burbujas de jabon o cabeza de alfiler en el espacio del todo.
and if your surprized how this is done by itself, it never happneed all at once lol, it gradually started to come in to place, it all became blanced due to gravity i imagine, and who knows, maybe there are some galaxy's in caos
You touched on something notable. Do you really think the universe is put together so perfectly? It's an absolute mess.
Easy example: Testes. They have to be at a lower temperature than the body. They're critical for reproduction, and yet are easily damaged due to their placement. They get knocked around during jumping and galloping. They're not even level with each other. Terrible design, just terrible.
Planets, comets, and asteroids crash into each other. Stars explode. Not so perfect.
mphtower what are you talking about? God probably attended for the stars and things to crash into each other, to make new things. Theres always an excuse for an athiest. I feel sorry for you.
mphtower - or anyone who can answer this. If God exists is there any information about what he did before creating the Universe? I know about the fall of lucifer. But If God is eternal that is a lot of time to do things before creating the Universe. Gods not restricted to time so how do you explain something that is eternal? And how do you comprehend there is no begining for God? We know there was a begining for the Universe. But there is a mystery as to what happened before the big bang.
Also aside from the written word of books like the Bible what evidence points toward the existance for God? And how accurate are we about how old the Universe really is? Was there nothing in space that sparked the big bang? How is that possible? When an effect needs a cause.
there is the theory of spontaneous creation, but its unlikely, i do believe that something created us, but not god, like some sort of supreme alien being who wanted to create the universe,please reply, i want a response, positive or negative, its only converstion to me!
isthereanythathasnt3 - Atheists reject God because they want science to explain everything. From a rational standard point, I believe not all Atheists rule out the posibility of God. And If God created the Universe he created the science that goes with it. Any supreme being could very well exist it's just that most humans want the evidence. I think logically that an intelligence beyond ours could very well have created everything. But unless that's reavealed to us people will remain skeptics.
Many of the wonders that we have are miracles in themselfs. And I think all of it we all take for granted. I also think that humans can be very arrogant in their beliefs to reject this possibilty of the unknown. Who knows what we have yet to discover?
So, there is a kernel of truth in all things religious. Is it possible that the theory of a supreme being is based on some sort of perception of reality? Sure. But it's also possible that it's the personification of something that we do not yet understand.
Yes, we can be arrogant in rejecting the unknown. But we can be equally arrogant in thinking the unknown is just like us.
I agree there is some truth in all religions. And I think it's a shame in this day and age that people discredit religion. Mostly for it's negitive impacts on humanity. Forgetting like history, much of religion has been a learning and discovering factor for who we are as humans today. If we had the knowledge to make a computer in ancient times we could have done it. That knowledge was always here we just discovered how to do it. what other knowlege already exists that we don't know about?
That factor of discovery proves the arrogance and pride that humans have. Humans are intelligent but nothing has ever been invented or ever will be invented unless it had the potential to be made in the past. In other words like I was saying if we had the knowedge cell phones could have existed in ancient times. All we do as humans is discovery. what works in the universe we live in Mix a with b what happens? That factor implies possible intervention with intelligence greater than ours.
@AlienPhilosophy I get your feelings on this, but make no mistake, scientists are not arrogant in the face of the unknown. This is a false 'meme' if you will, that people often say to scientists 'don't you consider the Universe to be a fascinating mystery?Do you any sense of the transcendent?Isn't it bigger than all of us?'To fact is that scientists are the least arrogant, as they never assume, they have to submit their ideas to the scientific method and they are always fascinated by the unknown
Other particles that feed in the thick saltwater at the beginning. They form, grow, become a plant. And first moving live: a kind of jellyfish. And bla bla bla.........
There are a few ways to go with responding, so I'll take the one that leads to further thinking.
Religion and science serve the same purpose--to understand the universe. Think of the Greeks and their various gods. They sought to explain the unknown through personification of the world, because that's easiest to do. What they saw was real (there was a sun that went across the sky), but the explanation was purely human (a dude with a chariot).
@BigBossRell123 you believe in god so how did he "create" humans when evolution clearly proves we evolved from another species like like monkeys and apes.
ok you say the big bang is bullshit, do u have another theory to back it up, AND that makes more sense? and not that god created it, because that makes no sense
after god shot all of the starts and planets out of his ass (aka big bang theory) i am sure the stars were not in a galaxy at first, recently found out there are super massive black holes in the center of nearly every galaxy we could spot which gives another clue on how galaxys are made now huh? though doesnt mean there was no big bang of course
The big bang theory says that all the stars and galaxies were once a very powerful white hole ( the opposite of a black hole witch eliminates matter instead of sucking it ) that wasn't stable and exploded forming us.
The are other whit holes in the universe, but not powerful enough to make a universe and usually they collapse in a black hole
They keep claiming the oldest stars they can see (what about the stars farther out they can't see) are 13 billion light years away so this was the alleged "big bang". But since stars would have moved out to that position at a speed LESS than speed of light, that would make them way over 30 billion years old, which immediately debunks their 13 billion years as the "age of the universe". red shift used to explain universe expansion is really result of gravity interaction of masses passed in space.
You're correct, of course. I was just being snarky for no particular reason. However, I would argue that Adams is a continuation of Reich's and Glass' minimalism, and certainly Adams was influenced by them. But I would also say that the dynamism in his music is a pretty big difference.
Also, HEY PORTUGAL! Apparently this video is popular there. Go Portugal!
Out of all of the things you do (general songwriting, musical comedy pieces, etc.) I think this -- synthesized, orchestral like compositions -- is your strongest point. You always had great taste in synth sounds.
Very much so. Even more amazing is that this may not have been the first time the universe went through the big bang. There is a possibility that there have been multiple big bangs, each with the universe expanding and then condensing again over the course of hundreds of billions of years. So cool.
Yea, if thats true there is a theory out there called the reocurring theory, i believe by Neizchtke, that says everything you have done and that has ever happend, has happend before and will happen an inumerable amount of times more, which means if there is a big bang, and it ends with the big crunch, everything will repeat itself forever
Im actually kind of pissed its not solved, I wish I would be around when it is solved, because sometimes it feels like thats the only thing that has any meaning in life, because we have no idea what happens after death
Science and Religion should never be matched together that is why scientist created something called pseudoscience
void787 2 months ago
@ahmedofa the big bang wasn't an explosion it was an expansion. Fallacy
MrRightfootleftfoot 4 months ago
The universe, that's our word for this incredible place. Questions that's we search for like when this all started? How big is it?(that's what she said), when will it end & how?
jkang24 5 months ago
there are always a fight between theists and atheists........am an atheists
if they(theists) really stick or eager to worship god then why they depend on things which are made by scientists........never go to the hospital even in emergency............
never use vehicles ............i think they have been hypnotising since their childhood that there is no reason only god have done this...............so every time when they can't know the cause they think that "god must have done it".......
asdf5201 5 months ago
Can we make rocks?
heartlessvietboy 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i can tell you just how life was made the opposite of nothing is everything and the bible says there's a time for everything and every activity one thing that is a part of everything is seperation the past travels behind us and the present travels ahead of the past so they are opposites that when time ticks it mirrors the past with the opposite therefore nothing being past becomes something being present watch my video on creation i know way more
t2k2011 7 months ago
those who say that GOD didn't create the universe, and they say that the universe has been created from the big bang!
so if u think u r right, the big bang was an explosion of what?? ( it must be a thing)
and where did the grand explosion happened? ( it must be somewhere )
this THING and this SOMEWHERE are created by GOD!
ahmedofa 8 months ago
@ahmedofa By using your logic, that it must be a thing, must have been created by someone, and must have existed somewhere, then tell me this. Who created God?
timelordthetrain 6 months ago
@timelordthetrain first off all You have to know that God do not have a Body but He Created things and give these things a body... Your Question in Who creates God... means that u r 100% confused that who creates the Universe and you sure that its cant creates itself..... so thats the Answer of your Question Some One Must Creates These That and That Is God...... You Should kept this n mind that God bless a limited knowledge to the man
stunningpakistani 4 months ago
@stunningpakistani You made no sense and you put words in my mouth. I know that the Universe created its self, and there is no God. You never really answered question. You just said that God created the Universe, never told me where God came from.
timelordthetrain 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timelordthetrain ok once your eyes will be closed and then you will understand all these things but the time will have been gone......
stunningpakistani 3 months ago
Epic video man, the music really sets an awe-inspiring feeling!
Iamjustherek 9 months ago
@2qewl4u you are a fucking cunt that spreads ignorance and disinformation
number6of6the6beast 9 months ago
Comment removed
Futurecop2012H 10 months ago
@2qewl4u You don't need a creator to create the universe. Cosmologists have seen mini solar systems being created by mini big bangs, all the time. When I say mini I mean in comparison to us they are actually rather huge. But religion was created when man wanted to know how we got here and all that. Every ancient civilization had a God but different to each other, which to me seems obvious that all other religions are made up by man. We have science now to explain things. Religion is unnecessary
BrocK2026 11 months ago
Heres me Brother's Perspective, NOTHING HAPEN AND SOMETING HAPEN
GzeroArchives 1 year ago
Suddenly nothing appeared out of nowhere colliding into nothing and then nothing magically exploded which made dinosaurs.
Makes perfect sense.
scavenski 1 year ago
10 ppl who disliked this belive GOD made universe himslef.
AndyCAgi 1 year ago
In the words of Kent Hovind, that's ... stupid!
desasterz 1 year ago
@desasterz in the words of kunt hovind ...".hey guards !! my cell mate wants to.show me the big gangbang theory'"'
mugwamp4 1 year ago
Can you make a version of this video where it repeats for about 2 hours? That's how many times I watched it. Thanks! Mind blowing, and all probably true!
Sviolinist 1 year ago
Comment removed
JimmyFox01 1 year ago
who's music is this? can I have the whole track please???
Neanderthalcouzin 1 year ago
Uhmm... sorry... but it's kinda stupid to think that God did all this. That's just bullshit... sorry...
MultiqProductions 1 year ago 19
@MultiqProductions How do you think it happened then? It has to have been created by someone. It can't have just appeared. Neither I nor anyone else can explain it because as you have seen compared to all these creations we're just mere human beings, our level of intelligence will never reach that of the creator.
2qewl4u 1 year ago
@2qewl4u No one I know can explain infinity. Which has to be true since no one can explain what's supposedly outside the Universe. Which there has to be since no one can explain infinity. What you're doing is what people did in the stone age and medieval times.. You can't think of a solution, so "God must have done it." Back when no one could possibly grasp what a star was, it was "put there by God", that goes for pretty much everything in human history, until it's proven completely natural.
jwh30385 1 year ago
@2qewl4u To give you an analogy. In 1349, over 2000 Jews were burnt to death by fundamentalist Christians to please God. This was a result of the Black Death that killed over half of Europe's population. As it was an invisible killer was deemed impossible, the clergy though, it is absolutely impossible that this wasn't caused by God himself as a wrath on human kind. We know today, that this invisible killer was bubonic plague, which thanks to science is easily cured in a few days by penicillin.
jwh30385 1 year ago
@MultiqProductions God didn't make this, NASA made it.
robthebuilder321 1 year ago
no scientific explanation...really none . Just a animation of the universe like a trugianatickulus planet .
1Mihailo 1 year ago
@1Mihailo Where did the uploader say he would post an explanation of said history?
ericleb01 1 year ago
So, how did you tell stakeholders the relation between the universe and Oracle? That the universe is less prone to inconsistency? That your Oracle DB's keep expanding and there is no way to stop it?
Impressive. :P
sickmonkey 1 year ago
I would recommend captions
niconikko 1 year ago
beautiful!
TheVideoMaker001 1 year ago
Branes
MrAvidLearner 2 years ago
Cool the way you've compiled this. Big fan of Glass myself too and have written stuff a tiny bit like his in the past too. Your music's better though
downfader2 2 years ago
nice vid
schu808 2 years ago
aside from being completely untestable, the braneworld theory for the start of the universe presents alot more problems than the more widely accepted big bang followed by inflation theories.
kapwns 2 years ago
I like men
Unregistered100 2 years ago
jhahahahahahahahahahajajajjajahahahahahahahajajajahahahahahahahajahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahaha
Chapina56 2 years ago
def philip glass.
holdenholden 2 years ago
Those parallel rectangle boxes,where they meant to be parallel Universes? Funny,we already live in a parallel universe,its called our mind.There is no parallel universe apart from this universe,its all part of one generalized magnetic field,there is no action,no pure or spontaneous action,there is only reactions to one another like domino's,So there is no doer or traveler and no time.There is no entity that is gauging anything, there is no single mind, just one world mind from which we borrow.
KarthikSoun 2 years ago
karthiksoun, could you ellaborate on the above statement in a PM to me? even though right now i dissagree with some of what you say, i find it interesting. maybe i dont dissagree as so much as i dont fuly understand what you meant.
Heliosvector 2 years ago
This post is contradictory. If there are no parallel universes the very beginning of our universe would have to be spontaneous.
Although its hard to talk about spontaneous events if very existence of time might be only the property of this universe. Therefore terms like event, spontaneous, action->reaction concept etc. may be useless outside our universe, because they only apply if there's a flow of time .
PepePL89 2 years ago
in wat way was it contridictory? Ask anyone of ur harvard, cambridge scientists to prove to me thr is any such thing as pure action or spontenious action and i would pay thm a million dollors. Like u.g.krishnmurti says thr is no action in anything..
KarthikSoun 2 years ago
Im reffering to this sentence:
There is no parallel universe apart from this universe,its all part of one generalized magnetic field,there is no action,no pure or spontaneous action
In my response there were two main points:
1. If there are no other universes what would cause the beginning of our universe.
2. To talk about action and reaction there is one requirement -> The time flow, which may be only the property of our universe. Therefore it might not apply outside it.
PepePL89 2 years ago
1.Again your stuck in linear terms, thr is no strait line through infinity, everything is cyclic.. The beginning is the coming of a new end.
Like Richard Dawinks says there is no matter, beyond the atoms, nucleus, quarks what is left is nothing. Matter is like throwing a pebble on a still pond,waves appear, its a disturbance.Same way the energy in the universe is disturbed, matter appears.
2. If thr is no action thn thr is no time, if thr no center thr is no circumference.
KarthikSoun 2 years ago
however, if time is shared and leaked throughout all universes, like gravity from the 11th dimension, then all things would be fundamentally similar (in the sense that we all percieve the flow of time) then again, all perceptions of time may be different. such as the idea that time is just an ocean that covers everything and has no beginning or end. we humans see time as a straight path waiting to be filled in, while other beings might see it as a path that is already filled in.
infinitenight2093 2 years ago
uhm... do you have any evidence, or any math that even remotely suggests this? And I wont even begin to pick apart the contradictions in your statement...
trekid54409 2 years ago
lol.
KarthikSoun 2 years ago
@KarthikSoun Proof of these statements? If there are numerous galaxies, why not numerous universes? There have to be other dimensions/universes. It only makes complete sense. Of course, only if you actually understand physics - which you clearly don't - since you dismiss the idea as a child dismisses foreign concepts.
Sviolinist 1 year ago
@Sviolinist Physics does not include personal attacks only religion does that, unless ur makeing physics into an religion whose theories cant be challanged. Physics is meant to be challenged all the time or it wont be science. So i dont think u understand the nature of science. May be u should be a Mulla in a Mosque.
Even if there where parallel dimensions i dont see how its another universe! Infinity does not mean two.There is only one and thats the nature of infinity.
KarthikSoun 1 year ago
A lot of nice effects. Sweet eye candy.
undeadcowstudios 2 years ago
i rekon if u go so far in space u hit a black wall and u cant go no further =)
spoty212 2 years ago
lol, but whats on the other side of the wall O.o
jk19studios 2 years ago
O tal vez existimos como el eco resultante de otro universo, que a su vez esta dentro de otro y asi sucesivamente, quiza nuestra unica frontera limitante sea el tiempo, puesto que el espacio podria ser finito e infinito al mismo tiempo.
ElAmanuensis 2 years ago
maybe the universe has always existed, and there is no beginning or end.
layzsonsabitch 2 years ago
hahaha, I disagree.
Rainbowpikmin93 2 years ago
maybe the universe has always existed, and there is no beginning to it
layzsonsabitch 2 years ago
Religion doesn't serve to understand the universe. Only the work of the human can do it with mathematics and technology combined.
efergarmx 2 years ago 14
@efergarmx How do you think humans came to existence? The delicate organs and systems in your body. You think an explosion did that? sorry but that's just retarded. We will never know how God created us as our level of intelligence will never reach his. If we keep thinking about how we were made, when the world started, how God came we'll simply go crazy.
2qewl4u 1 year ago
@2qewl4u No one has ever claimed that an explosions created our organs. To understand macro-evolution, you have to be able to grasp the concept of "a billion years", if you can, it's fairly easy. If you can't grasp that concept, without coming to terms with how long that truly is (and I can't fully myself either), you'll be left believing that evolution means a monkey can spontaneously evolve into a human. It's very easy to not understand something and say "oh God must have done it!"
jwh30385 1 year ago
@2qewl4u My point is: The fact that we don't know yet, or may never know, does in no way shape or form mean that God is responsible for it. As humans, we constantly feel the need to explain the unknown, this is the reason that both religion and science exist. Religion as an excuse, and science as a method.
jwh30385 1 year ago
@jwh30385 Science (in particular astronomy and cosmology) has fascinated me since a very young age. It is our tool for understanding the Universe that surrounds us. I do believe, however, that religion and spirituality holds a value for humanity. They fill a niche in human society, helping people face problems in life and benefit through the guidance of moral values. Science and religion (in its broadest meaning) are not mutually exclusive, as many are led to believe.
CarlosMarti123 1 year ago 2
@CarlosMarti123 I agree that spirituality helps a lot of people, and that it is not necessarily mutually exclusive with science. My point is, I think it is too easy for people to simply say "God did it" whenever science hasn't been able to explain something yet. Spirituality is part of humanity, and the backbone of cultures and civilizations, and it would be sad to see it all go. However, it can also be very destructive, and when it does clash with science, it can be dangerous.
jwh30385 1 year ago
@jwh30385 You are right, though it does not happen with all spiritual beliefs, and it would be unjust to make such a generalization. Most of the time, these are caused by extremists or power-seekers trying to justify their own actions. The realms of religion and science in themselves are clearly marked off from each other. The problem comes when one tries to deny unquestionable scientific evidence with unreasonable faith, thus effectively isolating themselves from the reality around them.
CarlosMarti123 1 year ago
Increible, muy buena animacion.
la teoria de que los universos existen separados unos de otros como paredes afiladas en un espacio mayor o omniverso es interesante, tan pausible de su posibilidad como que seamos el resultado de los vestigios de universos anteriores mas grandes y vitales que al morir convierten el resto de su energia agonica en espamos de creacion que permitan la creacion de nuevos universos como burbujas de jabon o cabeza de alfiler en el espacio del todo.
ElAmanuensis 2 years ago
so much to know, so much to see
k4ba 2 years ago
One word "God" there's no way this could be done its self.
BigBossRell123 2 years ago
well you cant say there is a god, if theres no proper proof, im just on the fence, i rather not say
Vinniekl 2 years ago
and if your surprized how this is done by itself, it never happneed all at once lol, it gradually started to come in to place, it all became blanced due to gravity i imagine, and who knows, maybe there are some galaxy's in caos
Vinniekl 2 years ago
Well, the Higgs Boson could explain that.
LessthanJake14 2 years ago
Comment removed
BigBossRell123 2 years ago
God did this, there's no way a universe can be put together so perfectly.
BigBossRell123 2 years ago
You touched on something notable. Do you really think the universe is put together so perfectly? It's an absolute mess.
Easy example: Testes. They have to be at a lower temperature than the body. They're critical for reproduction, and yet are easily damaged due to their placement. They get knocked around during jumping and galloping. They're not even level with each other. Terrible design, just terrible.
Planets, comets, and asteroids crash into each other. Stars explode. Not so perfect.
mphtower 2 years ago
mphtower what are you talking about? God probably attended for the stars and things to crash into each other, to make new things. Theres always an excuse for an athiest. I feel sorry for you.
BigBossRell123 2 years ago
Wait, so does God make the new things, or does God create systems whereby new things are created? You seem to be taking the latter point.
If so, then you would be arguing that the universe is created by chance with an initial input by God. Thus, it's still not perfect.
(Not an atheist, by the way.)
mphtower 2 years ago
mphtower - or anyone who can answer this. If God exists is there any information about what he did before creating the Universe? I know about the fall of lucifer. But If God is eternal that is a lot of time to do things before creating the Universe. Gods not restricted to time so how do you explain something that is eternal? And how do you comprehend there is no begining for God? We know there was a begining for the Universe. But there is a mystery as to what happened before the big bang.
AlienPhilosophy 2 years ago
Also aside from the written word of books like the Bible what evidence points toward the existance for God? And how accurate are we about how old the Universe really is? Was there nothing in space that sparked the big bang? How is that possible? When an effect needs a cause.
AlienPhilosophy 2 years ago
there is the theory of spontaneous creation, but its unlikely, i do believe that something created us, but not god, like some sort of supreme alien being who wanted to create the universe,please reply, i want a response, positive or negative, its only converstion to me!
isthereanythathasnt3 2 years ago
isthereanythathasnt3 - Atheists reject God because they want science to explain everything. From a rational standard point, I believe not all Atheists rule out the posibility of God. And If God created the Universe he created the science that goes with it. Any supreme being could very well exist it's just that most humans want the evidence. I think logically that an intelligence beyond ours could very well have created everything. But unless that's reavealed to us people will remain skeptics.
AlienPhilosophy 2 years ago
Many of the wonders that we have are miracles in themselfs. And I think all of it we all take for granted. I also think that humans can be very arrogant in their beliefs to reject this possibilty of the unknown. Who knows what we have yet to discover?
AlienPhilosophy 2 years ago 2
So, there is a kernel of truth in all things religious. Is it possible that the theory of a supreme being is based on some sort of perception of reality? Sure. But it's also possible that it's the personification of something that we do not yet understand.
Yes, we can be arrogant in rejecting the unknown. But we can be equally arrogant in thinking the unknown is just like us.
mphtower 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
AlienPhilosophy 2 years ago
Comment removed
AlienPhilosophy 2 years ago
I agree there is some truth in all religions. And I think it's a shame in this day and age that people discredit religion. Mostly for it's negitive impacts on humanity. Forgetting like history, much of religion has been a learning and discovering factor for who we are as humans today. If we had the knowledge to make a computer in ancient times we could have done it. That knowledge was always here we just discovered how to do it. what other knowlege already exists that we don't know about?
AlienPhilosophy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That factor of discovery proves the arrogance and pride that humans have. Humans are intelligent but nothing has ever been invented or ever will be invented unless it had the potential to be made in the past. In other words like I was saying if we had the knowedge cell phones could have existed in ancient times. All we do as humans is discovery. what works in the universe we live in Mix a with b what happens? That factor implies possible intervention with intelligence greater than ours.
AlienPhilosophy 2 years ago
@AlienPhilosophy I get your feelings on this, but make no mistake, scientists are not arrogant in the face of the unknown. This is a false 'meme' if you will, that people often say to scientists 'don't you consider the Universe to be a fascinating mystery?Do you any sense of the transcendent?Isn't it bigger than all of us?'To fact is that scientists are the least arrogant, as they never assume, they have to submit their ideas to the scientific method and they are always fascinated by the unknown
Neanderthalcouzin 1 year ago
good point :]
isthereanythathasnt3 2 years ago
isthereanythathasnt3- Then what created the aliens?
MLGKarma 2 years ago
Other particles that feed in the thick saltwater at the beginning. They form, grow, become a plant. And first moving live: a kind of jellyfish. And bla bla bla.........
lyue1996 2 years ago
Hi AlienPhilosophy,
There are a few ways to go with responding, so I'll take the one that leads to further thinking.
Religion and science serve the same purpose--to understand the universe. Think of the Greeks and their various gods. They sought to explain the unknown through personification of the world, because that's easiest to do. What they saw was real (there was a sun that went across the sky), but the explanation was purely human (a dude with a chariot).
mphtower 2 years ago
@BigBossRell123 you believe in god so how did he "create" humans when evolution clearly proves we evolved from another species like like monkeys and apes.
Ethooo1993 1 year ago
very Phillip Glass - like indeed, awesome score though.
rigobueno1 2 years ago
The Big Bang is Bull Shit
stashincash06num1fan 2 years ago
lol ur a fan?
but true BIG BANG IS BS
stashincash06 2 years ago
Can I be a fan as well?
But, gotta ask, why do you say it's BS?
mphtower 2 years ago
fine Bull shit
Happy?
lol
stashincash06 2 years ago
ok you say the big bang is bullshit, do u have another theory to back it up, AND that makes more sense? and not that god created it, because that makes no sense
imseanlol 2 years ago
well you can go to hell
heithan
stashincash06 2 years ago
ic no better theory :/
imseanlol 2 years ago
The stuff going on at 0:30, is that supposed to represent the branes colliding at the 5th dimension and hence, starting the big bang?
opiates 3 years ago
white* holes sorry
boggy2411 3 years ago
such small people on such a large scale will never be able to solve such a huge mystery easily said in my point of view
reaperflynn3 3 years ago
after god shot all of the starts and planets out of his ass (aka big bang theory) i am sure the stars were not in a galaxy at first, recently found out there are super massive black holes in the center of nearly every galaxy we could spot which gives another clue on how galaxys are made now huh? though doesnt mean there was no big bang of course
reaperflynn3 3 years ago
The big bang theory says that all the stars and galaxies were once a very powerful white hole ( the opposite of a black hole witch eliminates matter instead of sucking it ) that wasn't stable and exploded forming us.
The are other whit holes in the universe, but not powerful enough to make a universe and usually they collapse in a black hole
boggy2411 3 years ago
Where you got the music from ?
Cuenca20 3 years ago
The universe is actually far older than that "bang" theory. Nice animation though.
ZeroHumans 3 years ago
The universe's origin and age remains unknown. Way to purport that for which you have no evidence, only speculation.
philnoll 3 years ago
"The universe is actually far older than that "bang" theory. Nice animation though."
Do you know where on youtube or anyplace else that could describe this? This is very interesting to me...
oakleywellington 3 years ago
They keep claiming the oldest stars they can see (what about the stars farther out they can't see) are 13 billion light years away so this was the alleged "big bang". But since stars would have moved out to that position at a speed LESS than speed of light, that would make them way over 30 billion years old, which immediately debunks their 13 billion years as the "age of the universe". red shift used to explain universe expansion is really result of gravity interaction of masses passed in space.
ZeroHumans 3 years ago
Redshift indicates gravitational equilibrium:
Gravitational Energy = -mu/R + mcv
centripetal acceleration = v^2/R
centrifugal accel. = cv/R cos(v)
Redshift is result of v^2/R = cv/R cos(v),
thus: v/c =cos(v)= sqrt(GM/Rc^2)
Gravitational energy -mu/R + mcv is a quaternion energy of real energy: -mu/R, & vector energy: mcv
Real energy gives centripetal acceleration and vector energy gives centrifugal(dark energy)
Newton & Einstein never included vector energy in their gravity
ZeroHumans 3 years ago 2
wow, someone sbeen doing there homework!
stijn165792 2 years ago
i hate being stuck on this planet its obvious that we will never master space travel specially being the universe growing and stuff ..
penguinowns 3 years ago 2
I'd take you up on your assertion that John Adams just sounds like Glass. They're stylistically two very different composers.
Otherwise, nice video, though.
madlutist 3 years ago
Howdy Madlutist,
You're correct, of course. I was just being snarky for no particular reason. However, I would argue that Adams is a continuation of Reich's and Glass' minimalism, and certainly Adams was influenced by them. But I would also say that the dynamism in his music is a pretty big difference.
Also, HEY PORTUGAL! Apparently this video is popular there. Go Portugal!
mphtower 3 years ago
What a clever and totally pleasing vid! :) 5*s!
nameofthepen 3 years ago
whoa
happyface3457 3 years ago
wow...breathtaking 5*
berylman 3 years ago
why?
AgentKonrad 3 years ago
Where did the branes come from ?
brazensteel 3 years ago
From a nut ball brain >.>
Darkfoster22 3 years ago
They evenually were.
MaBu888 3 years ago
very awesome.! =)
PaigeW20 3 years ago
Out of all of the things you do (general songwriting, musical comedy pieces, etc.) I think this -- synthesized, orchestral like compositions -- is your strongest point. You always had great taste in synth sounds.
Cheers,
Jon Rowe
JonWRowe 3 years ago
Nice! Hypnotising isn't it guys?
lapatrole 4 years ago
Very much so. Even more amazing is that this may not have been the first time the universe went through the big bang. There is a possibility that there have been multiple big bangs, each with the universe expanding and then condensing again over the course of hundreds of billions of years. So cool.
humanistfuture 4 years ago
Yea, if thats true there is a theory out there called the reocurring theory, i believe by Neizchtke, that says everything you have done and that has ever happend, has happend before and will happen an inumerable amount of times more, which means if there is a big bang, and it ends with the big crunch, everything will repeat itself forever
grizadams07 3 years ago
Could you reading this reply right now be a mathematical extrapolation, not only of the dynamics of the big bang, but every big bang before it?
Let us be thankful that the grand unified theory has not been solved, for it gives us something to ponder, and hope that free will is real after all.
zaphodb777 3 years ago
Im actually kind of pissed its not solved, I wish I would be around when it is solved, because sometimes it feels like thats the only thing that has any meaning in life, because we have no idea what happens after death
grizadams07 3 years ago
Would it make you feel any better to find out that this universe is a nucleated bubble of false vacuum?
zaphodb777 3 years ago
What? Read my first comment about Neitchzke and understand what the subject was about. I know all about the universe, in basic term
grizadams07 3 years ago
zaphod, what do you mean dude i dont get it please understand
penguinowns 3 years ago
Who knows maybe all your question are answered when you die. IN FACT why don't you go kill yourself to find out!? JK
djvbb12 3 years ago
wow
juhkuh 4 years ago
beautiful!
grafight 4 years ago