Added: 3 years ago
From: Antoine2k8
Views: 20,268
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • quality football, but no quality video.

  • DEVIN HESTER!!!!!

  • ALL HAIL ED REED GO CANES!!!!!!!!

  • Dont know how Iowa Vs. LSU in 2005 Captial One bowl isnt on here, as it its one of the best bowl finishes ever, just saying.

  • derrell reives kr hit!

  • @greymoose1000 bull shit

  • why the fuck is that stupid mauluga hit on the UCLA quarterback shown yet it doesnt show that UCLA fucking dominated the trojans for the rest of the game and kept their sorry fucking asses out of the BCS game. Bruins got jipped,they take down their No. 2 rival and dont get shit, but one lousy fucking hit is shown in "the best of the past 10 years."

  • oklahoma sooners is the best in the big 12

  • i guess the usc trojans need to be removed from this. bush has been a great player. but a brainless retard. how the fuck could anyone be that stupid to do that shit when he knew he was breaking the rules. he's cost his team their national championship and will likely lose his hesman. what an idiotic piece of shit

  • why is USC shared with LSU in 2003?

  • unlike the NFl Collage football doesn't have a playoff.

  • @Antoine2k8 but that's the only one where it is a "shared" title. Why not Auburn in 2004?

  • @feetforlovePSU USC would have manhandled Auburn in 2004 just like they did the year before.

  • @greymoose1000 There's no guarantee that would have have happened. The 2004 team was superior to their 03 counterparts. In addition, the Auburn team had made it through the toughest schedule of the 3 teams. Oklahoma had no place in that nc (or the one in 03 for that matter)

  • @feetforlovePSU Because the both polls voted USC to be the best. If oklahoma had won in a close game, more then likely they would have been co-champs. Considering that usc destroyed oklahoma, there was no such co-championship

  • @americasnextopm0del USC didn't play in the NC game, Oklahoma and LSU did so they said if LSU wins USC gets a share but if OU wins OU gets the sole title. LSU won by 7 in a hard fought game

  • @soccer22champ it's because USC got the AP poll national title i realized

  • @soccer22champ ou wouldn't have gotten sole possesion of the title. because usc was consnsus #1 heading into the bowls, it would have taken a miracle for them to not get share as long as they won against michigan

  • @americasnextopm0del hello, they were co-national champs you idiot

  • @gamelvr1 How about you read my other comments you idiot.

  • @americasnextopm0del Good question. LSU won the title in 2003.

  • boise state hasnt lost a game in 2 years

  • they lost to TCU last year

  • @Antoine2k8 not they didnt

    

  • @tbone55757 Look at the date of comment was posted. Boise state did loose to tcu in the bowl game following the 2008 season, so his comment was right you idiot.

  • @leeahx3 Boise state really needs 2 prove they are a powerful team they have had a week schedule to be honest

  • @leeahx3 more like boise state hasnt played anybody in 2 years

  • now you can add alabama to 2009 ROLL TIDE

  • THE SEC HAS DOMINATED THIS DECADE

  • Yes THEY HAVE! Even though the Big Ten was the winner of the BCS the sec has been dominant..,,but.... GO BUCKS!

  • I don't think the Big East deserves a BCS bid, either. I'm all for tweaking it so *deserving* teams like BSU, Utah, and TCU get in, giving the BCS some quality matchups.

    What I'm saying is, I'm all for tweaking the BCS. I'm not for a system that sucks the life out of the season and rivalry games. Playoffs suck the pagentry out of sports. I love college football because it is, while controversial, unique.  It's different than all the other sports in America. I love it.

  • More like, lets not give BCS bids to the Big 10.  They frickin choke every year. Go OSU, oh ya, they already lost fucking faggot conference.

  • And when you can argue intelligently, please, get back to me.

    Got a problem with me being a Buckeye fan? Tough shit, Go Buckeyes! Scarlet and Grey til I rot away!

  • I was trying to talk to your level, let me try again. The Big10 is the worst "major" conference every year. They always get ranked high and end up choking and the Buckeyes are the worst at it. They need to start voting the Big 10 lower...

  • Talk to my level? Hmph. Just because I'm a Buckeye fan doesn't mean I'm not intelligent.

    What school are YOU a "fan" of? Wait, don't tell me...Texas? Florida? USC? Perhaps one of those disgusting people who jump on the Small Guys Bandwagon, only to hop off after they've had their 15 minutes of fame?

  • Hahaha no, Miami. You know, the team that got screwed by the Big Ten ref against the Bucks

  • Lol well then. You still can't let that go, huh? It was 8 years ago. 8 years ago I was in junior high school. Now I'm a junior at Idaho State.

    I think it should surprise you that I like Miami too. I watch Canes games when I get the chance (I caught the beatdown of G-Tech).

    My opinion on the matter? Forget the game. It was 8 years ago. You have more important things to do, like keeping the momentum going and getting back to the upper tiers of CFB, where you belong.

  • Hate to break it to you guys, but college football is better with elite teams. That's why playoffs suck. Because the best teams might not face each other.

    CFB must always have an elite. To hell with the smaller teams. They're just as greedy as big teams are. All talk and no tradition or pride.

  • rearly do the best teams ever face each other any ways texas beat oklahoma but did get a chance to play at the title game come on texas was way better then oklahoma but yet oklahoma got the shot. Utah winning every game but not getting a shot thats dumb you can fix that with a playoff.

  • You can't fix shit with a playoff because the best teams may not face each other.

    Texas not playing in the Title game was the fault of the Big12's bizzare tie-breaking rules, not the BCS, and you know this.

    I swear the BCS debate is like debating global warming. All sentiments and sympathy for the issue while totallly discounting the cold facts.

  • dude when you have even the presedent of the free world saying it's dumb you no there a problem the best way to figure out who is best is by playing it on the feild

  • And I'm saying the government doesn't really matter in this debate. They've got bigger issues to fry. In the end, a playoff is just as bad (or worse) than the BCS. People get left out. The best teams don't always play each other.

    And get this: The little guy gets his 15 minutes of fame and usually disappears. Last I checked, sports is something you have to capitalize off of.

    People don't care about small teams. They just ride with them until their moment is over.

  • but your not understanding what i saying the best way play is to play not just vote on some one or let a computer decide when players decide there own fate it becomes that much more better it's just the money factor for those big school that will never let it happen

  • And I'm going to say this: I'm all for tweaking the BCS, so there's less computer involvment and more human involvement. Yes, I hate automatic bids. I'm tired of weak, non-Miami ACC teams in the OB. I don't like watching an undeserving Big10 team in the Rose, and at the same time I hate USC always getting in the Rose instead of something awesome, like the Sugar or Fiesta (USC vs SEC/Big-12 Powerhouse. Fun to think about)

    ...continued...

  • @Antoine2k8 Texas way better then Oklahoma? Oklahoma almost the game, and Texas got some favorable calls to help them win. Plus Oklahoma got the tie breaker over Texas.

  • @Antoine2k8 I know this a year old but a playoff will not fix anything. No sport ever pits the best two teams against each other. The BCS is a great system but needs to be tweaked so all teams are giving the same amount of respect.

  • How in the HELL can you even say that USC was champs in 2003......we was voted number ONE in TWELVE polls will USC in 6.......the BCS crowned LSU #1....we got the crystal football.......GEAUX TIGERS!..........all i can say is this.....that dumbass QB we had last year has been BENCHED......the talent we are bringing back and signed.....WATCH OUT...LSU is gonna roll this year.....and to the BIG TEN lover........the SEC RULES.....Big Ten FB is CRAP!

  • in the history books it still says shared title until we get a flawless system will never have it write like this year utah undefeted florida 1 lost who deseves it more

  • acc fan through and through here, but this man is right. sec is god, and usc's "titles" are such bullshit.

  • i can't stand people who think that the south is the only place to find football it's these lame losers who keep the bcs around

  • i don't think that's an accurate statement. bcs supporters are all over the country, because they know if they don't hold onto their bias-filled power, then no other conference would get a shot! the sec is that good.

  • SEC might love their football, but the Big 10 teaches you how to play it.

    Notice how some of your big teams don't do so well against the Big 10 in bowls? Florida is 2-4 against the Big 10...

    Only Ohio State struggles in bowls against the SEC.

    But your coaches? Saban, Meyer,Miles....all started in Big 10 country. We show you how to play the game, thats why you're so good.

  • haha!! good one man!! plus.. dont u love how most of the NFL flops come from the SEC.. HA! thats funny...

  • weak argument. you say some of the big teams in the sec don't do well against the big ten in bowl games, but then you only list florida's 2-4 record. then you bring up ohio state's struggles...soooo, that's one school from each conference, what's your point? and about the coaches...you think the big ten shows the sec how to play?!? those coaches started in the big ten because to coach in the sec you actually have to be a proven successful coach. start lower and work your way up

  • no OSU UM highlights from 2006 makes these 3 videos = fail

  • doesn't matter, both teams were overrated to begin with (florida 41, osu 14; usc 32, michigan 18). osu's 2002 team was a good one i'll admit.

  • so what if they were "overrated" that was by far the best game of that year, one of the best in the past 10 years at the biggest stage, #1 and #2 OSU and UM, first time in history playing each other.

    even UM fans say that was one of the best OSU UM games to watch

  • there a lot of moments i messed but it would take me for ever to pick every good play from every good game that might take 100 vids are u not happy with just 4

  • Hard to get up for a bowl game when you just beat your rival who was #2 in the biggest game of that storied rivalry's history.

  • I close my eyes every time i see vince running 2 da endzone in the rosebowl it hurts too much to watch

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more