Added: 1 year ago
From: Jeanng11nov71
Views: 38,359
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • D*mn I would hate to be stuck in a fire tornado

  • oklahoma gets the wite mouth monster

  • the fire tornado was awesome

  • Comment removed

  • dangerous

  • is a F2 tornado strong enough to tear up a house? or destroy a car?

  • @Vamp6661 Oh God Yes. I'm an experienced chaser and have seen F-2's do major damage. Unless a person has seen a tornado up close and in person.....you cannot imagine just how huge a F-2 tornado is. Once you do it's easy to understand just how powerful these are. Even an F-1 can scare you to death, and yes, they are more than capable in killing you quickly. Don't let Hollywood or t.v. shows impair your thoughts on the smaller tornadoes.

  • wow fire and water tornados are freaking awesome sadly those two are rare >_<

  • any type of tornado im still getting the hell out of there

  • not all waterspouts are tornadic in nature

  • 0:06 Nuclear war ?

  • @playsbba018 obvy not

  • tornadoes have both interested me and scared me...i blame the wizard of oz for that. I like this video. thanks for posting :D

  • the first one is a worm not a tornado!

  • I noticed a few erroneous bits of information. One, the video purporting to show multiple vortices was showing a satellite tornado and the vid showing the satellite tornado was actually showing a multiple vortex tornado.

  • at 2:20 the three tornadoes are combining? (sorry i dont speak english)

  • i am noticing a lot of wrong information on this video

  • @sqlru31 Please explain where the informations are wrong, in the video or in the description and give a few examples of what you have considered wrong informations and, if possible, the sources of the bases of your conclusions. Incidentally, are you an expert on tornadoes?

  • @Jeanng11nov71 The idea that updrafts and downdrafts meeting creates the spin that causes tornadoes is incorrect; if that were the case, every thunderstorm would be producing tornadoes. The spin comes from vorticity in the ambient environment. Also the things that derbah mentioned; they mix up the definitions of "multi-vortex" and "satellite" tornadoes. Also, they show a dust devil when they say landspout; and describe dust devils as a type of tornado; they are not.

  • @Jeanng11nov71 well for one thing they are formed from columns of air that are horizontal are made vertical

  • @Jeanng11nov71

    Not sure what anyone else found, but the description of a multiple vortex tornado in the video is slightly misleading. A multiple vortex tornado is not multiple tornadoes within the same supercell, but multiple vortices within the tornado itself. The central vortex in one becomes unstable near the ground so the main funnel has to branch off while following the same column of air.

  • @IxenBlaze You are correct, they had the info totally wrong with the video showing the so-called "multi-vortex" tornado.

  • I wonder if a waterspout creates a whirpool underneath it.

  • @DramaticMoments That......is a damn good question. I would suppose that it would....depending how concentrated the waterspout's base is a the point of contact with the water....and how long that waterspout base stayed in one place on the water. Very interesting.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more