@Vamp6661 Oh God Yes. I'm an experienced chaser and have seen F-2's do major damage. Unless a person has seen a tornado up close and in person.....you cannot imagine just how huge a F-2 tornado is. Once you do it's easy to understand just how powerful these are. Even an F-1 can scare you to death, and yes, they are more than capable in killing you quickly. Don't let Hollywood or t.v. shows impair your thoughts on the smaller tornadoes.
I noticed a few erroneous bits of information. One, the video purporting to show multiple vortices was showing a satellite tornado and the vid showing the satellite tornado was actually showing a multiple vortex tornado.
@sqlru31 Please explain where the informations are wrong, in the video or in the description and give a few examples of what you have considered wrong informations and, if possible, the sources of the bases of your conclusions. Incidentally, are you an expert on tornadoes?
@Jeanng11nov71 The idea that updrafts and downdrafts meeting creates the spin that causes tornadoes is incorrect; if that were the case, every thunderstorm would be producing tornadoes. The spin comes from vorticity in the ambient environment. Also the things that derbah mentioned; they mix up the definitions of "multi-vortex" and "satellite" tornadoes. Also, they show a dust devil when they say landspout; and describe dust devils as a type of tornado; they are not.
Not sure what anyone else found, but the description of a multiple vortex tornado in the video is slightly misleading. A multiple vortex tornado is not multiple tornadoes within the same supercell, but multiple vortices within the tornado itself. The central vortex in one becomes unstable near the ground so the main funnel has to branch off while following the same column of air.
@DramaticMoments That......is a damn good question. I would suppose that it would....depending how concentrated the waterspout's base is a the point of contact with the water....and how long that waterspout base stayed in one place on the water. Very interesting.
D*mn I would hate to be stuck in a fire tornado
kaylajackson30 1 week ago
oklahoma gets the wite mouth monster
ManyFaces2011 2 weeks ago
the fire tornado was awesome
eggroll757 2 months ago
Comment removed
MzPittman01 2 months ago
dangerous
mrtanvir201 4 months ago
is a F2 tornado strong enough to tear up a house? or destroy a car?
Vamp6661 6 months ago
@Vamp6661 Oh God Yes. I'm an experienced chaser and have seen F-2's do major damage. Unless a person has seen a tornado up close and in person.....you cannot imagine just how huge a F-2 tornado is. Once you do it's easy to understand just how powerful these are. Even an F-1 can scare you to death, and yes, they are more than capable in killing you quickly. Don't let Hollywood or t.v. shows impair your thoughts on the smaller tornadoes.
WickedTornado 1 month ago
wow fire and water tornados are freaking awesome sadly those two are rare >_<
zohir256 7 months ago
any type of tornado im still getting the hell out of there
TheNightridr 8 months ago
not all waterspouts are tornadic in nature
kmfdm5 9 months ago
0:06 Nuclear war ?
playsbba018 10 months ago
@playsbba018 obvy not
Gator115 8 months ago
tornadoes have both interested me and scared me...i blame the wizard of oz for that. I like this video. thanks for posting :D
iheartsupernatural 11 months ago 5
the first one is a worm not a tornado!
kiwininja100 1 year ago
I noticed a few erroneous bits of information. One, the video purporting to show multiple vortices was showing a satellite tornado and the vid showing the satellite tornado was actually showing a multiple vortex tornado.
derbeh 1 year ago 8
at 2:20 the three tornadoes are combining? (sorry i dont speak english)
CTRPolar 1 year ago
i am noticing a lot of wrong information on this video
sqlru31 1 year ago
@sqlru31 Please explain where the informations are wrong, in the video or in the description and give a few examples of what you have considered wrong informations and, if possible, the sources of the bases of your conclusions. Incidentally, are you an expert on tornadoes?
Jeanng11nov71 1 year ago
@Jeanng11nov71 The idea that updrafts and downdrafts meeting creates the spin that causes tornadoes is incorrect; if that were the case, every thunderstorm would be producing tornadoes. The spin comes from vorticity in the ambient environment. Also the things that derbah mentioned; they mix up the definitions of "multi-vortex" and "satellite" tornadoes. Also, they show a dust devil when they say landspout; and describe dust devils as a type of tornado; they are not.
Runningonbrains 9 months ago
@Jeanng11nov71 well for one thing they are formed from columns of air that are horizontal are made vertical
djoshman14 8 months ago
@Jeanng11nov71
Not sure what anyone else found, but the description of a multiple vortex tornado in the video is slightly misleading. A multiple vortex tornado is not multiple tornadoes within the same supercell, but multiple vortices within the tornado itself. The central vortex in one becomes unstable near the ground so the main funnel has to branch off while following the same column of air.
IxenBlaze 2 months ago
@IxenBlaze You are correct, they had the info totally wrong with the video showing the so-called "multi-vortex" tornado.
WickedTornado 1 month ago
I wonder if a waterspout creates a whirpool underneath it.
DramaticMoments 1 year ago 2
@DramaticMoments That......is a damn good question. I would suppose that it would....depending how concentrated the waterspout's base is a the point of contact with the water....and how long that waterspout base stayed in one place on the water. Very interesting.
WickedTornado 1 month ago