@jctevere Jeeps are built very strongly. And at 35, there was quite a bit of difference, the whole front end of the Jeep was destroyed and there was about a foot of crumple, the Jeep would no longer be driveable. A 35 mph collision has nearly twice the energy as a 25 mph collision because velocity (speed) is squared:
Thanks for that handy little formula! I'm going to write it down! Does speed have to be Miles or Kilometers? Same goes for mass? Pounds or Kilograms. Or is it just Lbs with Mp/h and Kg with Km/h?
@CarPro1993 You are very welcome! I don't know what you'd call the units, not pounds-force... let's just say units. Here's a website that provides the force in pounds and tons:
hyperphysics. phy-astr. gsu.edu /hbase/carcr. html
(take out the spaces, links can't be posted "straight up")
That's a really nice site, I was able to calculate that my Audi for example is 3,500 Lbs and hits a solid wall at 35 Mp/h, it has an impact force of 71.1 tons.
@CarPro1993 If it stopped in a foot, yes. I forgot to say, you need to put in the crush distance in the "crash that stopped the car in a distance of" box just above where it shows the tons. Default crush distance is 1 foot / 0.3048 m.
For example, this Jeep is 4,000 lbs, hit a solid wall at 25 mph, and crushed in 6 inch or 0.5 feet. The force on the Jeep is 83.6 tons. Your Audi would take less force because it has "crumple zones" that sacrifice the front end for safety.
@CarPro1993 I bet if the airbags hadn't gone off it wouldn't be totaled. Then again, the unbelted dummies would have experienced very high HIC and Chest G values. And that Jeep probably could never be restored to drive in perfect condition.
Oh god look at those poor wipers!
MrDerbius 2 weeks ago
holy shit id hate to be hit by that on the road .
scott14705 2 months ago
like a rock
MrVac14 4 months ago 5
@MrVac14 now i do like jeep expecially the new jeep grand cherokee, but this is a 25 MPH test not much going on.
RaudelSolis 1 week ago
bet it still ran after that
imnottellinguwhy 4 months ago 9
Why is there such little crumple zone deformation? I can't imagine that from 25 mph to 35mph there is that much of a difference.
jctevere 7 months ago
@jctevere Jeeps are built very strongly. And at 35, there was quite a bit of difference, the whole front end of the Jeep was destroyed and there was about a foot of crumple, the Jeep would no longer be driveable. A 35 mph collision has nearly twice the energy as a 25 mph collision because velocity (speed) is squared:
Force = mass * speed squared
July 22, 2011 11:54 am
whattheheck1000 7 months ago
@whattheheck1000
Thanks for that handy little formula! I'm going to write it down! Does speed have to be Miles or Kilometers? Same goes for mass? Pounds or Kilograms. Or is it just Lbs with Mp/h and Kg with Km/h?
CarPro1993 7 months ago
@CarPro1993 Yup. Lbs with Mp/h and Kg with Km/h.
Example:
A 1992 Ford Escort hits a wall at 35 Mp/h.
Force = 2400 lbs * 35 mph squared
Force = 2400 * 1125
Force = 2.7 million units
July 22, 2011 12:04 pm
whattheheck1000 7 months ago
@whattheheck1000
Impressive! Thanks!
CarPro1993 7 months ago
@CarPro1993 You are very welcome! I don't know what you'd call the units, not pounds-force... let's just say units. Here's a website that provides the force in pounds and tons:
hyperphysics. phy-astr. gsu.edu /hbase/carcr. html
(take out the spaces, links can't be posted "straight up")
July 22, 2011 12:08 pm
whattheheck1000 7 months ago
@whattheheck1000
That's a really nice site, I was able to calculate that my Audi for example is 3,500 Lbs and hits a solid wall at 35 Mp/h, it has an impact force of 71.1 tons.
CarPro1993 7 months ago
@CarPro1993 If it stopped in a foot, yes. I forgot to say, you need to put in the crush distance in the "crash that stopped the car in a distance of" box just above where it shows the tons. Default crush distance is 1 foot / 0.3048 m.
For example, this Jeep is 4,000 lbs, hit a solid wall at 25 mph, and crushed in 6 inch or 0.5 feet. The force on the Jeep is 83.6 tons. Your Audi would take less force because it has "crumple zones" that sacrifice the front end for safety.
July 22, 2011 12:19 pm
whattheheck1000 7 months ago
@whattheheck1000
Oh, I didn't notice that. I will keep that in mind next time I do a calculation.
CarPro1993 7 months ago
@CarPro1993 Alrightyy then!
July 22, 2011 12:25 pm (HA, my birthday in PM)
whattheheck1000 7 months ago
@whattheheck1000
Is your birthday today?
CarPro1993 7 months ago
@CarPro1993 No, it's December 25, hence the 12:25.
July 22, 2011 12:36 pm
whattheheck1000 7 months ago
Thanks!
dave11686 7 months ago
I bet that thing's still driveable. There's hardly any damage.
July 22, 2011 12:29 am
whattheheck1000 7 months ago
@whattheheck1000
It bent the front frame up some and shifted the windscreen (Broke it too), new bumper, bumper support. frame needs realigned, and airbags.
It could drive, but it could be a total loss.
CarPro1993 7 months ago
@CarPro1993 I bet if the airbags hadn't gone off it wouldn't be totaled. Then again, the unbelted dummies would have experienced very high HIC and Chest G values. And that Jeep probably could never be restored to drive in perfect condition.
July 22, 2011 12:36 am
whattheheck1000 7 months ago