no people like gasoline because it works better it has nothing to do with efficiency or corruption. airplanes are more flexible. trains are not nearly as fast . who cares about efficiency if it gets you there, there is never going to be a true energy shortage.
@bizarrocker That made very literally no sense. Like, zero. All I got was some jargon. As far as the possibility aspect - well, hey, if we spent as much money on this as we do on aeronautic travel, this could happen within... weeks.
@miknos2 We already have the technology for this stuff so why is it being studied for so long? Like a curving escelator that has to be researched for a few more years. Why would you study an escelator for a few years?
The basic maglev costs about 55million Euros/mile for the track alone.
1,000 miles = 55 billion euroes. Really? This is not even the "vacuum" tubes. Those are theoretically possible, but not over long distances. A single terrorist detonation at any section would cause the whole snaking tube to explode.
The train only replaces a single aeroplane.
What about accounting for the amount of pollution required to BUILD such an engineering feet?
All this is very basic minded theoretical thinking.
If you check ET3 website you'll see the cost is less than a normal train (few million per mile).
Terrorist could detonate any train today but you don't see it on the news, so the same safety theory (guard the whole distance/track) is not necessary in my opinion.
Tubes could be "filled" with people constantly like a subway (many wagons/tubes) to compensate planes.
Certainly will be pollution to build it ,but would be worth it after.
The economy is based on oil and they will not allow FREE cost transport for the people . This vacuum travel was discovered in the 19Th century but was disregarded by government's to protect the Coal and Oil interests. If the Greedy who run the world decide to build,it will take ten years and be up and running.
If you mean about this transport, maybe in 10 years we'll se one (search for ET3). If you mean about the Resource Based Economy, I think It will be hundred of years because a world coordination is needed. Best thing for now is spread the word and hope decision-making men take the initiative somehow.
And who will pay the trillons of dollars to build this? Who will give up the land for the tracks? Who could afford the tickets? Hmmm...just because we can travel into space, doesn't mean it's affordable.
@birdmanlv are you serious? .... in The Venus Project, Money doesn't exist... what a stupid question to say "Do we have enough fancy papers to build this?" ... pff come on, it's about resources, not fancy paper.
Actually is not that expensive. Check et3.com for more information.
Zeitgeist movement is about a Resource Based Economy (everything without a price-tag). I thought it was completely BS (not even close to possible) but changed my mind after reading about it. It's doable? YES but it's utopia. Maybe in 400 years.
@miknos2@miknos2 You got your head screwed on, but The Venus Project is NOT a utopia. Jacque Fresco loathes the term. Type "the venus project utopia" and watch the third clip down.
@miknos2 even with a "Resource Based Economy ", the effort, the use in manpower and not to mention efforts in research and maintenance would still make it a massive project even if you didnt have to pay workers...
not to mention the fact that you need a way to power it all. and Superconductors need to be cooled along its entire stretch, apparantly liquid hydrogen is used. a system to resupply liquid helium to a track from the US to china would be even more massive.
no people like gasoline because it works better it has nothing to do with efficiency or corruption. airplanes are more flexible. trains are not nearly as fast . who cares about efficiency if it gets you there, there is never going to be a true energy shortage.
circusboy90210 2 months ago
bull Scheiße... I want to see that tunnel from new york to beijing.... who will make it?? is it feasible ? underwater? Penis? die and let live!!!
bizarrocker 3 months ago
@bizarrocker That made very literally no sense. Like, zero. All I got was some jargon. As far as the possibility aspect - well, hey, if we spent as much money on this as we do on aeronautic travel, this could happen within... weeks.
sithlizard 2 months ago
how can the passengers breathe without air?
Isnt this kind of transportation really expensive to built?
IndoPindaNL 4 months ago
In switzerland it was the swissmetro. But the environmentalists were against the project!
I think the mohammedanism is against energetic revolution!They want controll all!
siriusstar10000 4 months ago
why is it so necessary to use high speed technology? Why are people so hasty?
Leofox94 4 months ago
@Leofox94
Why waste time? :)
miknos2 4 months ago 3
@miknos2 Thats like asking why we need sleep
JCdenton50 4 months ago
@JCdenton50
I don't get the analogy.
But let's say it's a productivity manner. If the train goes faster, it means less wagons are needed to carry people.
Imagine you can travel to a distant country for the same price (none). Would you rather spend few hours, or days?
For a slower enjoy-the-ride type would be a cruise.
miknos2 4 months ago
@miknos2 We already have the technology for this stuff so why is it being studied for so long? Like a curving escelator that has to be researched for a few more years. Why would you study an escelator for a few years?
JCdenton50 4 months ago
@JCdenton50
I believe it might be for standardization, safety among other rea$on$.
miknos2 4 months ago
@miknos2 I dont think it takes a few years to determine if something is safe, if you die or get hurt after its used a few times then fix it.
JCdenton50 4 months ago
@Leofox94 holy shit are u dumb? enjoy your fucking lowspeedtrains in america.
fayereaganlover 3 months ago
@fayereaganlover Well lowspeed is better I think because there is a low chance of any accidents and crash.
Leofox94 3 months ago
The basic maglev costs about 55million Euros/mile for the track alone.
1,000 miles = 55 billion euroes. Really? This is not even the "vacuum" tubes. Those are theoretically possible, but not over long distances. A single terrorist detonation at any section would cause the whole snaking tube to explode.
The train only replaces a single aeroplane.
What about accounting for the amount of pollution required to BUILD such an engineering feet?
All this is very basic minded theoretical thinking.
CollectingQuest 5 months ago
@CollectingQuest
If you check ET3 website you'll see the cost is less than a normal train (few million per mile).
Terrorist could detonate any train today but you don't see it on the news, so the same safety theory (guard the whole distance/track) is not necessary in my opinion.
Tubes could be "filled" with people constantly like a subway (many wagons/tubes) to compensate planes.
Certainly will be pollution to build it ,but would be worth it after.
miknos2 5 months ago
The economy is based on oil and they will not allow FREE cost transport for the people . This vacuum travel was discovered in the 19Th century but was disregarded by government's to protect the Coal and Oil interests. If the Greedy who run the world decide to build,it will take ten years and be up and running.
kitwann1 11 months ago
@AmazinglyAgnostic
If you mean about this transport, maybe in 10 years we'll se one (search for ET3). If you mean about the Resource Based Economy, I think It will be hundred of years because a world coordination is needed. Best thing for now is spread the word and hope decision-making men take the initiative somehow.
miknos2 1 year ago
If you have a accident, you would end up in Moon at speed of 4,000 miles/ hours.
comedianFA 1 year ago
@comedianFA
Maybe it's better than "just" dying from a plane crash?
miknos2 1 year ago
@miknos2 i see your not a flying person
vaporized1000 6 months ago
And who will pay the trillons of dollars to build this? Who will give up the land for the tracks? Who could afford the tickets? Hmmm...just because we can travel into space, doesn't mean it's affordable.
birdmanlv 1 year ago
Comment removed
ttthedark 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@birdmanlv are you serious? .... in The Venus Project, Money doesn't exist... what a stupid question to say "Do we have enough fancy papers to build this?" ... pff come on, it's about resources, not fancy paper.
ttthedark 1 year ago
@birdmanlv
Actually is not that expensive. Check et3.com for more information.
Zeitgeist movement is about a Resource Based Economy (everything without a price-tag). I thought it was completely BS (not even close to possible) but changed my mind after reading about it. It's doable? YES but it's utopia. Maybe in 400 years.
miknos2 1 year ago
@miknos2 @miknos2 You got your head screwed on, but The Venus Project is NOT a utopia. Jacque Fresco loathes the term. Type "the venus project utopia" and watch the third clip down.
renoo27 1 year ago
@miknos2 even with a "Resource Based Economy ", the effort, the use in manpower and not to mention efforts in research and maintenance would still make it a massive project even if you didnt have to pay workers...
not to mention the fact that you need a way to power it all. and Superconductors need to be cooled along its entire stretch, apparantly liquid hydrogen is used. a system to resupply liquid helium to a track from the US to china would be even more massive.
evilblades 11 months ago
Pissed the fuck off. Spread this video to expose the corruption.
DocumentaryDoc 1 year ago
woah.
Nekosys 1 year ago