hahahgahahahahaha like seriously, how many drugs r u doing when u get an intervention from drug addicts lol ps im not dissin the rolling stones, they r one of my favorite bands of all time, i just think this is the greatest question ever! like steven adler being kicked out of GNR for drugs
oh amanda what have you done to me? I saw this chic at the gymn, about your size and figure, huge wonderful boobs like you, and i want her. oh i wanna get nasty with her. and it's all ur fault. i used to like those Jessica Biel looking skanks now i want Serena Williams! and you Amanda. and you........
Good question. How much is too much for the Stones? Here's another question for you to ponder: Ozzy Osbourne was kicked out of Black Sabbath for drugs. What was their limit? Was the rest of the band "only" pot smokers?
Hi Super Amanda (nice MySpace page by the way) The answer to your question regarding Brian Jones is that he was a great musician with knowledge of many instruments and many connections may I mention that and he was just used by M & K group members to get ahead in the music world. It's true that he was beginning to falter due to his use of drugs but what musical artist did not used drugs at that time.
But anyways Brian Jones was a great contributor to the Stones success.
The album was a recording of the Moroccan group the Master Musicians of Joujouka,in performance in their village, Jajouka, spelled "Joujouka" on the original album.[Jones called the tracks "a specially chosen representation" of music played in the village during the annual week-long Rites of Pan Festival.The album included three types of music: repetitive vocal chants , flute and drum music featuring "several distinct melodic motifs and improvisations over a drone"
Thanks for the info and let's talk about B. Jones doing drugs and what about the other guys specially Keith Richards ! now that is a real drug addict !
Brian was just stoned and drunk.Maybe if he'd done some coke or speed he would have been more active ? But it was really all about M&K taking over as leaders of the group.
I like the cocks AND the hens at the Sunwise coop and at Hackney Farm. Some are black and some have black feathers with a green under coat plus there are red and white ones too.
I'm not exposing my body, that is vital difference, I doubt I even have a nip slip out in cyber space. I'm also not a huge world famous star with millions of under TENS as my fans base whom I've brought porn too and mainstreaming via the commercialization of hardcore sex and bondage. I expose no body part, I simple suggest with cleavage-HUGE DIFFERENCE!
You see I don't find any different in somebody using cleavage and somebody using bondage and explicit hardcore sex. What is the difference if you think about it? I don't think this really pertains to the subject (even though you were a dominatrix in one video but it wasn't overtly sexual I agree).
But think about it? What is the difference in hardcore sex and somebody flashing their cleavage?
It's the same thing. The intentional utilization of suggestive imagery.
The only thing different is the word and how much is shown but the message is the same and the message is the essence and I believe in this circumstance it is still the same unless there are many other qualities which makes it different. If so please elaborate because then I can use it in my argument on how Modeling is the same Prostitution.
Of course there is going to be one or a couple people out of a group of believers who suggest that something is different and because it is the idea of a minority doesnt mean it is not true. Galileo Galilee suggested the Earth revolved around the sun which was different from the accepted concept that the Sun revolved around the Earth. Einstein theorized relativity and other astronomical proposals which turned out to be true. All theories of a smaller number.
But people wont believe that an adverse theory is true because they are too stubborn out of their own devotion to the original theory especially if it is generally accepted but soon it will inevitably be espoused as a valid hypothesis.
Exposing you vaginal lips and tits is NOT THE SAME as cheekily asking the stones a funny question in a gingham bra with 90% of my body covered. I'm covered up to the wrists in many of my videos are you blind? You need to be blaming the media and the rapidly wanning magazine retouch culture-none of my photos are even airbrushed! Don't blame someone's who's fully clothed!
Im not blind. What makes exposing a vagina and exposing breast any different if they are meant for the same purpose. It is just the societal shock which comes from it. I am pretty sure that back then breasts werent to be exposed but then it was generally accepted and people like you do it and defend it.
I wonder what would happen if I just expose my penis while cheekily asking Angelina Jolie a question on why she adopts babies all of the time.
I am not showing or exposing anything, it's suggestive. where are the nipples, the aureoles?
A penis, btw, is a VERY controversial symbol much more so then the breasts!!You have realize that's why you rarely see them in mainstream films but you see full frontal women naked. If you asked her with an obvious hard on, fully dressed it would be funny.
I think I am being misinterpreted because based on the logic which you think I am disclosing then a woman in a bathing suit going to the beach is being sexually suggestive.
But the thing is that when it is being done for marketing something or to grab attention then what is the difference?
They are both the same. Showing your breast to appeal to our sexual urges and me showing my penis to appeal to the same urges is the same thing, one is just more covered up.
THE COVERING UP IS THE DIFFERENCE! you just are part of a generation where mainstreamed hardcore porn is the norm so you never knew the world without.Living through it and reading about it are two different things.
Its not the body part that is exposed that make it such a big deal in my opinion, it is just the violation of morals and values which makes it so shocking. People have their religious values and other views on what is right and wrong which is what makes something so shocking. People exposing sex organs and their breasts are in the same category. I dont care what the media accepts and I dont go by what it accepts because it is the most corrupt and most immoral group in our culture.
with that logic then a large breasted &small waisted long limbed girl with full hips, FULLY DRESSED, would be considered immoral simply for having a traditionally sexually enticing figure.catholics molest simple beacuse they can't control (or 'legally' relive) natural urges that are perfectly normal but because they obsess and make it taboo it becomes a source of shame and ultimately lust and sadly abuse against those who are helpless like children.
No that is totally different and I think that is ridiculous. You cannot say that a woman or a man's is immoral because of the way he or she is shaped. That is totally out of bounds.
Biologically if they have a sexually enticing body that is due to our natural preferences of sexual attraction and the cultural preferences as well.
But if that buxom woman was to expose her breasts for the sake of marketing or getting attention then that is arguable.
u know what. I'm tired of seeing women who are saying that they are something more to say and hate being objectified when they just play up to the societal stereotypes. I am not questioning the intellectual capacity of this women nor am I doubting her political involvement but she is appealing to men by showing her boobs.
Seriously, if you want some respect then you need to show that you don't have to objectify yourself to get what you want.
"I'm tired of seeing women who are saying that they are something more to say and hate being objectified"
Well that certainly is not me!
Appealing to men (and woman and a few transgender folks) with boobs is fine in my book. Boobs are a happy thing that make people smile. Everything i do is tasteful and above board, never raunchy and usually witty.
MY compliant is the pussyscat dolls crap where it's just sheer airheads who can barely speak and who are 100% manufactured.
Yes boobs make people happy and excited. But is that seriously what you are doing? I mean yes that is true but that isn't how it is utilized honestly.
And you can tell. Because you dont use boobs in videos like this. You just show a still image of your rack and you use it as the immediate thumbnail image of your video to attract people.
It isn't used in your act which I clearly don't see, it is used to attract viewers and not to make people happy. That's just an excuse.
"Because you don't use boobs in videos like this. You just show a still image of your rack and you use it as the immediate thumbnail image of your video to attract people."
Dude! This video is an anomaly, I make industrials about my tits! haha You have obviously not watched any of my other videos, especially Boobs Gone Wild, Boobs and List Boobs and Bach and Does this Bikini make my boobs and butt look big?the middle icon plays to the gallery true, but this is showbiz!
I am not going to watch all a hundred of your videos to find out if this is an anamoly especially when the majority of your videos is just used to attract men or people who find breasts pleasing.
I am not concerned with the objectification even though there may be little there in the content (may seem contradictory), but many people just see boobs which is what I'm saying.
But you had to attract viewers by showing your breasts.
And the showbiz excuse doesn't make something right.
Why can't you be Alison Krauss? Why can't you be sans-gimmick? The event that one person has not used a gimmick and became successful proves that it is possible.
Either you need to use a gimmick or you find it easier to use a gimmick. Or you are a hypocrite.
Women who are good looking can be remembered for doing something else besides modeling in a magazine for the male demographic but in the end they are known for their gimmick and that is inevitable.
Because Alison Krauss, Paul Robeson etc those are very rare performers whose raw talent eclipse their image &who have to have it that way.Judy Garland was equally talented yet her image coexisted as a giant alongside her talent so much that people were attracted to the emotional fragility of her presence as they were to her voice.You can't control those things as performer, they decided for you by dna encoding. Townshend too,the greatest rock star if them all, has to break that guitar to bits!
Too many people are famous alone from their shock factor. Miley Cyrus isn't talented in my opinion but at the end of the day she wouldn't go down as a legend. She is just another Disney created person and people will recognize that and because she had nothing else to bring to the table she will be forgotten.
And sometimes the person has something behind the gimmick and the shock factor and that is fine. Mike Jagger has his marijuana and his nontraditional behavior but good music to follow it
Well sadly the media is keeping these bubblegum one hit wonder alive for years like a swine flu from the 1920's in a petri dish, keeping it around to make money hand over fist without letting truly incredible musicians and talents out there.
Oh and besides look at your tags. When I type in big boobs which I admittedly had done your videos pop up all of the time and I admit I am tempted.
But I see some of your videos and what is the act you claim? Posing with bikinis or walking around with your boobs exposed? What is that act? You can put a name on anything but it isn't going to change the content.
I agree with the Pussycat Dolls but are you so different.
The tags make me laugh, sometimes I include very random things and laugh even harder.
"What is that act?" The act is that I'm almost 5'10, very stacked and brunette.U will not find ANY women in the media or magazines who are tall with hourglass figures today. That reason alone makes me proud as I receive fan mail from men AND women who are very happy to see someone enjoying themselves, being witty, healthy and not buying into size zero hip less anorexia culture.The mis en scence is also popular.
But what are in your tags? What are in your tags that are used intentionally to attract viewers? big boobs.
That is explicit but now that I know your true purpose it can be used to show off your cause.
But I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about you muffling what you have to say with your physical attractiveness.
You have something to say but nobody is going to see that because you are just coming off as the stereotypical, suppressed women using breasts to try to get something done.
"stereotypical, suppressed women using breasts to try to get something done."
No, no one else would agree with you. The boobs may come of as a one trick Pony but suppression and muffling don't enter into it.And i am a mint original unlike 90% of the rip off pop cultural strip miners today. I just say what i want about things that concern me elsewhere. if i've learned anything it's that some of the most boring and annoying performers were once hot and then they became political and preachy.
It is stereotypical because women have been suppressed for so long that they are using any method they can to try to get noticed.
Women are suppressed despite the rights they are given. It is only an illusion, perhaps because it is right or just to subdue the women with the satisfaction of acquiring something.
Women voluntarily allow this to happen because no public woman is willing to shine by using another method which just perpetuates the suppression.
Blame madonna,a narcissist who brought the common denominator down to working out and fixation on fashion,hair&acting like a whore in public &that's the legacy women have been handed by the media. A work out body and expensive clothing is more important to today's society then a college degree whereas it used to only get your foot in the door.The woman you described would be scoffed at.
IT'S ALL ABOUT GETTING WOMEN TO CONSUME AND BE MATERIALISTS! I"M VERY VOCAL ABOUT BEING AN ANTI-MATERIALIST!
Okay but you are only an anti-materialist but you still stoop to her standards.
You dont need to make the standard to be as wrong when you follow the standard.
It would be a lot more rewarding if you were to just use your raw talent to get your foot through the door and then if you need to use a gimmick then use a gimmick.
As far as I'm concerned which you most likely don't care about, you are the same as them.
Stick out because you are much more meaningful than Madonna and I agree.
If you are really 19 then you don't remember what and how foul and low madonna's standards have been, she acted and posed like acomplete and utter slut, vagina shots, ugly micro tits topless in public,mini cone bra, talking about her sex life graphically, peeing on herself and talking about it on Letterman , hanging out with trash 24/7. I DO NOT STOOP THAT LOW OR EVEN CLOSE! PUHLEASE!
lmfao. I know about the other stuff but pissing on herself and other things I didnt know.
But we all can see ourselves as higher than another person because of certain actions but the concept is in fact the same.
That was her meal ticket. she used that to get her way and guess what that is all she is remembered for. Yes she has money and all of the fame but that cannot cover up what she really is and it shows and when she dies she will be remembered for that, not her money and not her cars.
What she really is a very Catholic and greedy person whom the media safe guards (she is one with the media in many ways) and protects, she is the ultimate Reagan era relic, she won't be remembered by my children.
Okay your not pissing on yourself but she used all of that as her meal ticket to rope in fans with shock value and using her sexuality and her societal deviance to try to get what she wanted.
You don't do that but that doesn't make you any better IN THIS CASE.
You perhaps are a better human being but when it comes to this you two are in the same boat.
What is the difference in one person using their breast (societal sex organs) and one person flashing their clad vagina?
There is too much arrogance when it comes to people and we all do it and its unfortunate and ignorant because if we can take a stop, to look at the big picture we will see how our actions are similar.
Christians look down upon the Islamic Jihadists of Al'Qaeda as if there isn't a combative bone in their bodies, but what about the Crusades. It's relativism but what that can mean is prejudice but our illogical and ignorant bias doesn't validate our perspectives.
The people in Mumbai recently and many other jihadists (NOT to be confused with Muslims)are perfectly willing to blow up the planet perhaps as a reaction to right wing Christian paranoid style in Western politics or perhaps because it's their goal. They sadly could care less about 'the big picture' you speak of.
But some of the evidence for my point is just so obvious and to even deny it is just being stubborn. Your using sex as your meal ticket. Breasts may not be anatomical sex organs but they do get people excited and have culturally been identified with sex.
The middle icon did not show up in malcolm's tribute or it would have had more views. marketing is marketing, jeez, you might want to live in North Korea!
Its kind of like what you said to me hours and hours ago. You said something about society or the media accepting raunchiness as empowering sexuality or femininity.
But Marketing is your case and in the case of many women or people who use it to exploit women is just a way to continuously objectify women and exploit women by objectifying them just to appeal to males. It's all relativism as you can see. The person doing something is most likely going to think it is right especially with labels
"..it to exploit women is just a way to continuously objectify women and exploit women by objectifying them just to appeal to males."
No, that is only a very small part of it for me. We are genetically wired over the past million years or so. some things are pointless to challenge or analyze. what i do appeals on many different levels.
Yes we are genetically wired over the past thousands of years we have been on this earth but what does that say in your defense? I know many things it can say and they do pertain to the case but it is more subconsciously than intentional.
But you were hardwired to show your boobs to appeal to males just to get attention. Yes that is possible but this isn't irresistible. That is something you are able to deviate from as opposed to not drinking water or eating, essential human needs.
Out of curiosity how does what you are doing appeals to people on what levels?
In the case of flaunting your breastesses (I misspelled it on purpose for a not so comic effect), but it appeals predominantly to the sexual awareness of males or people who just like breasts.
Wrong, million of females both straight and gay (and bi) love breasts and are into breast fetishism. Half the fan mail i get is from women. For every reason under the sun ,breasts appeal to millions perhaps billion of people. it's how we are fed when we pop out for Christ sake as well as other cultural and atheistic factors that I won't waste my life trying analyze!
Okay. You have proven my point which you have been doing in mostly all of your comments. Okay, so maybe you dont appeal to only men and I have accepted that in my comment or people who just like breasts but either way you are appealing to their sexual desires which doesnt disprove me or support your point. A sexual fetish is a sexual attraction towards an object to help get attention in what you call and what could be marketing.
And again you are appealing to their sexual tendencies or their devotion to a certain object as in fetishism instead of grabbing their attention in another way which pertains to the point of your video. I dont see how breasts fetishism has to do with asking a question to the rolling stones or anything else like that. But what it seems like your doing is making a marketing scheme and then trying to substantiate it with profound and deeper reasons to make it more than what it is.
You did not grow up living for nothing but the stones and The Who with The Stones nor does it appear you know much about the RST's VERY VERY sexual history.The kids in their teens who asked ?'s knew virtually nothing about the stones but i do. had I asked a question to the Who I would have dressed in something low cut but there would be no boob explosion middle icon.The Stones are the ULTIMATE embodiment of raw RnR satanic sexuality.They are a HUGE influence of mine!
I know nothing about those two bands. I just know Mick Jagger but I don't see the point in this because you have boob explosions in most of your videos.
This explanation can definitely prove your case but not the case of any others.
I agree because depending on who you are talking to or about or where your going you dress in a particular way. You wouldn't go to church dressed in a dominatrix outfit or having a conversation with a pastor. So I agree with you
Ok, it would not be a super Amanda video without the explosions and that's kind of where the issue lies. I've seen a huge shift in pop culture trends in my life time and you've barely lived through one generation and have always had the internet. there was innocence and class once in pop culture and even advertising-it was the norm and hot and heavy sex stuff was left for films and X rated theaters and the underground where it belongs.
I can live in one generation and still know another one has existed. I even said that all of this explicit sexuality wasn't publicized like this and was even condemned if put out and was discouraged from exhibiting.
Where has it all gone down hill from? What was the changing point? That is what I don't know but I am sure you can tell me since you lived in many generations (dont want to make you sound old or anything).
But you undoubtedly conformed to this generation's standards.
No!only about2)These are the key points where things went downhill:
MTV and the concept of music artist as cash cow and over exposed commodity,Madonna(as before)&the glut of personal trainers, celebrities walking around naked to get attention and being RESPECTED&PROTECTED by the media for it, reality TV,also spawned by Mtv and Madonna couple that with the Reagan era bling culture&society&pop culture just became cheap, vulgar&greedy artists now are not-few have any talent,originality orclass.
I'm not sexist at all. I don't listen to the stones but I did listen to this one recent song that you probably know: Has Anybody Seen My Baby. I love the imagery in the video and the song is stuck in my head. I find myself singing it all of the time.
I also like the lyrics.
I don't mind sexually explicit lyrics only if they are done in a tasteful manner. You know. I dont like songs that are like: Fuck. Fuck Fuck. Tits. Ass. and that is all it is.
well that's about 85% of the stones catalog if you read between the lines kootch, sex, drugs, drugs, Satan, pussy, coke, hash, junk, tits, groupies, cumming etc sorry tp be so graphic but Mick and Keef wrote the book on the raunchy rock n roll fuck song!
Oh i didnt know the Stones were into sex with the song you were singing. I know the chorus now.
Oh and i thought their famous logo of the lips was to warn audiophiles and aficionados of gingivitis.
But in this entire long-winded argument you could of told me that I am as equally bad as you are (in my opinion).
I am the person who had looked on your video, tallying up your views, and continuing something which I am against. Well people are all hypocrites and I'm human so I'm guilty.
You know what. We could continue this debate if you want to because I can talk about this all of the time. It benefits me and I need this cognitive stimulus because I feel that my brain is lagging a bit.
And I like arguments like this. It expands my mental capacities.
And now I can look at you in a different light now. You are not just dimwitted woman with big boobs. You actually have meaning and worth and have something to say.
It's evident. How do I get people to notice me and my message? I will put a long jacket on and then make my tags the message portrayed.
But not in the majority of the cases and especially yours. It may seem like a psychological strategy to attract viewers but it isn't. Its the only hope of getting viewers.
And I believe you have something to say but nobody will hear your concerns in the way you are dressed which is scanty and revealing to obvious parts which is sexually exploitative IMHO.
Well they will listen now! But even if i had entered into this wearing a turtleneck and no makeup at my webcam vlogging there are always people who watch videos and respond. even to females who are NOT booby.hell, there is a whole cult of guys who like mousy typesaka mosueburger! Guys just are attracted to women period as you well know. I say the important stuff ELSEWHERE and do not multitask. Boobs in one place, politics in one place, endangered species rights, nanny rights in one place etc
Of course they will listen now. You had your gimmick which you immediately used. I will understand if you need to resort to a gimmick when all else fails but it seems like you initially used a gimmick before your true talent shined through.
Do you need to use a gimmick? Just admit it because you kind of implicitly done so.
Yes they are going to listen now because you roped them in with your boobs and your figure. Not because of your intellectual capacity or your environmental involvement. The people that know you now on youtube are people who know you because of your figure. It happens to so many people and women and this is what they became known for.
Not the good they do. Their image and they use it intentionally to their advantage because they have the other way of getting fans. It's unfortunate but true.
Sure they are some group created by the industry to make money but they are part of a trend. (I hate trends and how people are slaves to the trends).
But you are obviously a slave to the trend of objectifying women. It's a shame because you have so much going for you and you have a purpose but you are just reducing yourself to eye candy. No act. Just boobs.
That's my point. You are squandered talent. I'm not just some sex-crazed male. but I guess you got what u want
Bottom line:the whole rationalizing of being sexy as empowering mostly is a false excuse for raunch culture that Ari Levy wrote about in FemaleChauvinistPigs this is because exploitation is never positive &the 'empowerment' is fleeting(as sadly witnessed in the aging and desperate carcass of madonna the godmother of ho-culture & exploitation without camp)
I DON'T EXPLOIT &I AM VERY CAMPY therefore I am truly empowered by what i do as there is obvious joy, mystery &interest on the part of others.
I agree with you and I learned something from you and what you believe is true about yourself, your empowerment and exploitation isn't evident.
What is evident is your exploitation of your physical attractiveness which is so obvious.
You dont need to do sexual acts or overtly do sexual things to be objectified. When you are just look at for your physical attractiveness and nothing more then you are being objectified sexually.
This pertains to many of your videos and not all of them.
"Seriously, if you want some respect then you need to show that you don't have to objectify yourself to get what you want."
I have respect, it's not something I seek from others AND I have what I want.I think what you are saying is that that my shtick seems predictable and that's your opinion. I happen too like, w/out bothering to analyze why,
the aesthetic of the NATURALLY large breasted happy Amazon girl ala Russ Meyer.I hate over analyzing desires is mankind's modern curse&passion killer.
No you obviously have something to say. I actually took the couple of seconds of my time to read your page and it didn't have normal stereotypical hobbies, occupations or interests. It actually had some valuable and meaningful things.
But you don't grab your attention with saying something or with a picture of your face or anything else. You show your boobs. You can try to cover it up with some type of explanation but the evidence is clearyou get attention with your rack and that is your point.
I am not complaining about boobs whatsoever. I just hate the fact that women just need to get attention or attract viewers by having their immediate picture as a huge rack.
I like boobs. :)
But I mean it takes much more than somebody teasing with their rack to get me excited so its really nothing.
When people go to your videos it isn't to hear what you are talking about. That's just a plus that they might listen to after they are done wanking off. They just come to see the boobs.
"...they might listen to after they are done wanking off. They just come to see the boobs."
And that's ok. Truly. No one in my videos is ever raped, tortured, bound pretending to like various and sundry objects shoved up into every orifice or faking an orgasm.There needs to be alternate sources of racy material to remind society that it's not all about the money shot.Despite NOT being anti-porn, i don't do porn or webcam for this very reason as 90% of the time it isn't fun or sensual to watch.
This is obviously a clash between two different opinions in two different topics.
I am saying that it is so predictable for a woman to get the attention of a man using her boobs without using her intellect. Unfortunately that is what women do and that is what it appears that you are doing.
But while you are also celebrating your figure (which I commend), you also exploit your figure for the purpose of sending a message.
Just like putting an apple between your breasts. What's the purpose?
It was in honour of Rene Magritte and Anna Nicole Smith had just died! I wrote along rambling tribute on my blog about her. She became exploitive and she paid with her life and I found that sad. Yet she was VERY campy and made fun of herself so there you go.I also like the lighting and the colours in that video and others. Look up Mis-En-Scene. "What is put into a scene" it's what I live for despite a small camera and very limited budget.
Hopefully you will make it and can get better equipment but you work with what you have but I don't see what the tribute in having an apple in between your breasts? lmfao.
please explain because anna nicole smith's modest look at herself and your stint doesn't make sense to me
I don't want it to make sense to you. i want people to say "I don't get her" just as much as people think it's cool. It's very Pythonesque and more British, my sense of humour.There were these vlog tributes to her of boring people talking and photo slide shows and i thought do something funny,Magritte along with Chagall is my favorite artist.
I didn't see being nonsensical wasn't okay. I just want to get the concept. If there is a pattern I want to get it.
I am not a trend follower. I dont follow trends. This female objectification trend I don't like and that is the reason why I am engaged in this dispute with you .
I hate today's pop culture. I like intellectualism, education, and when there is time some entertainment. I am an anti-materialist. I value the abstract things and most importantly enlightenment.
For 1967-69, Brian was ahead of his time in the group in terms of drug abuse- doing horse tranquilizer, on top of acid, on top of booze, etc. Except for occasionally acid, no one else in the band really did that many drugs at the time (Keith didn't get into Heroin til '69, but had the constitution for it. Brian couldn't handle anything, therefore making him musically expendable).
please don't diss Jones. He was a very good musician and died without full credit for his work with the Stones. His death was perhaps the single most tragic death in Rock.
The best Keef pic is 'patience please a drug free America comes first' portrait and the early shots from LP covers-What a handsome hunk a riffhard he is!
Brian Jones was kicked out of the band because he became un reliable, unstable and could barely play the guitar anymore. The Stones needed to move on.
well the thing is, keith richards would get super fucked up on heroin and shit, and im sure the rest of the guys drank a lot, but in the studio they pretty much kept it clean, brian would come in all fucked up and would pass out during sessions, and he became quite a drag to be w as time went on, the other members of the band would usually get their kicks when the tours would stop and before they had to enter the studio, brian would just get fucked all the time, and then there was his ego...
why was this flagged? oh please there are just some complete frigid prudes out there! leave it to a bunch of you tubers to flag a beautiful and funny woman with tastefully displayed cleavage. I guess skanky bleached blonds with silicone or video games violences only translates to some of you losers.
tubemeokay : after reading some of the other comments you've left me i highly recommend that you keep your comments to Holocaust denying and KKK women's auxiliary groups. you belong with human refuse like that!
whatever asswipe what's so depressing is that so many of you fake groveling stones fans approach them like you're addressing city hall or some supreme court justice that sort of goes against their original message--duh asshole(s)... you are an insipid/mindless slave if you take rock stars seriously. And I'm more of a stones fan than you will EVER BE, words can't describe it certainly not the ones that your 54 year old hateful self chooses.
actually it does. I have a booming and clear broadcaster's voice and considering I did this all in one take with no tripod I'm pretty damn articulate AND I have titties. You are just pissed off and leaving your sundry generic hater comments because I'm happy and have stuff going on an you don't have jack.
"Silicon?" Oh please, a plastic surgeon can't even come close to endowing someone with what nature gave me. I'm not fake at all, this is a joke and you are a humorless relic.
It's all in the biographies and interviews, Amanda. Work indeed seems to have suffered. Being in a band is a professional job as any other. My feeling is that they may have underestimated his talent, and tried harder to keep him in the band, but that's just an opinion.
U are hot tooo hot
grandcreateur2 1 year ago
Comment removed
songwritervideos 1 year ago
hahahgahahahahaha like seriously, how many drugs r u doing when u get an intervention from drug addicts lol ps im not dissin the rolling stones, they r one of my favorite bands of all time, i just think this is the greatest question ever! like steven adler being kicked out of GNR for drugs
zerbo803 1 year ago
Brian felt he doesn't belong to the Stones anymore so he and others made up
this story about his alleged drug problem as an excuse for leaving world best
rock and roll band!They hated each other fo some reason.
You know,as years went by, no amount of drugs proved too much to
kick Ron Wood out of the Stones or anyone else from their close ranks!
sylentcrow 1 year ago
oh amanda what have you done to me? I saw this chic at the gymn, about your size and figure, huge wonderful boobs like you, and i want her. oh i wanna get nasty with her. and it's all ur fault. i used to like those Jessica Biel looking skanks now i want Serena Williams! and you Amanda. and you........
KBoogs719 1 year ago
Good question. How much is too much for the Stones? Here's another question for you to ponder: Ozzy Osbourne was kicked out of Black Sabbath for drugs. What was their limit? Was the rest of the band "only" pot smokers?
86celtics 1 year ago
he got kicked out not because of the drugs but because of that he could not play anymore, because of the drugs, he fucked up
horbergaren 1 year ago
Hi Super Amanda (nice MySpace page by the way) The answer to your question regarding Brian Jones is that he was a great musician with knowledge of many instruments and many connections may I mention that and he was just used by M & K group members to get ahead in the music world. It's true that he was beginning to falter due to his use of drugs but what musical artist did not used drugs at that time.
But anyways Brian Jones was a great contributor to the Stones success.
chanoc455 2 years ago
Brian Jones was amazing and an important figure in British rock history. Pipes of Pan at Joujuka is not to be missed!
BrickLaneBetty 2 years ago
You are right sister but what's "Pipes of Pan at Joujuka"
explain please !
chanoc455 2 years ago
The album was a recording of the Moroccan group the Master Musicians of Joujouka,in performance in their village, Jajouka, spelled "Joujouka" on the original album.[Jones called the tracks "a specially chosen representation" of music played in the village during the annual week-long Rites of Pan Festival.The album included three types of music: repetitive vocal chants , flute and drum music featuring "several distinct melodic motifs and improvisations over a drone"
-Wikipedia
BrickLaneBetty 2 years ago
I thought I knew about the Rolling Stonesthanks for the info
chanoc455 2 years ago
Thanks for the info and let's talk about B. Jones doing drugs and what about the other guys specially Keith Richards ! now that is a real drug addict !
chanoc455 2 years ago
@chanoc455 Keith is not anything apart from PERFECTION!
BrickLaneBetty 1 year ago
Amanda, you didnt hav 2 trick us with that still. You're always fun to listen... and look at!
startrekalien 2 years ago
shave the mustache babe
RockkNRolla 2 years ago
?? I have HUGE lips, they cast shadows, there is no facial hair butty.
BrickLaneBetty 2 years ago
Brian was just stoned and drunk.Maybe if he'd done some coke or speed he would have been more active ? But it was really all about M&K taking over as leaders of the group.
zachbos666 2 years ago
It's because he was doing too many of MICK & KEFF'S drugs!
"Get yer own, Brian! Yer outta the band! Ah, ah ah! Yer not taking the water wings-those are Charlies!"
stratman123 2 years ago
i cum in my pants
catchfree84 2 years ago
ha ha well put , how much does it take to get kicked out ?
pubsterguy 2 years ago
why the moustache?
wurzygon 2 years ago
Believe me, there isn't one! The light casts shadows because I have such full natural lips!!
BrickLaneBetty 2 years ago
Your a little to full of yourself
arkansasbean 2 years ago
well if I say .. i am addicted ...and my addiction is u..
u've to answer me ..
take care.. kisses..
guyzepo123 2 years ago
How many drugs do you have to do to get kicked out of Guns N Roses?
Apparently enough to give you a stroke and have you end up on some crap reality show.
qqrk1372 3 years ago
lol!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
where can i see you naked?
fingerboard621 3 years ago
Haha nowhere on the net until my website premiers later this year. There will be no porn or skanky stuff but there will be tasteful nudity.
xoSuper Amanda
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
k cant wait for the site lol
fingerboard621 3 years ago
I have a question also: Do you like black cocks?
quincy965 3 years ago
I like the cocks AND the hens at the Sunwise coop and at Hackney Farm. Some are black and some have black feathers with a green under coat plus there are red and white ones too.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
What about black penis?
quincy965 3 years ago
Haha that's too personal!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
I bet you DO!
quincy965 3 years ago
Happy Holidays Super Amanda!! I Hope you have been happy as well!
xoxox
pinklisa 3 years ago
GREAT TITS
RHCristobal 3 years ago
I'm not exposing my body, that is vital difference, I doubt I even have a nip slip out in cyber space. I'm also not a huge world famous star with millions of under TENS as my fans base whom I've brought porn too and mainstreaming via the commercialization of hardcore sex and bondage. I expose no body part, I simple suggest with cleavage-HUGE DIFFERENCE!
MYSTERY!! The 1950's!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
You see I don't find any different in somebody using cleavage and somebody using bondage and explicit hardcore sex. What is the difference if you think about it? I don't think this really pertains to the subject (even though you were a dominatrix in one video but it wasn't overtly sexual I agree).
But think about it? What is the difference in hardcore sex and somebody flashing their cleavage?
It's the same thing. The intentional utilization of suggestive imagery.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
ONE is SUGGESTIVE and the other is EXPLICIT-BIG difference.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
The only thing different is the word and how much is shown but the message is the same and the message is the essence and I believe in this circumstance it is still the same unless there are many other qualities which makes it different. If so please elaborate because then I can use it in my argument on how Modeling is the same Prostitution.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
it's not. perhaps to you but you are only one in a billion people.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Of course there is going to be one or a couple people out of a group of believers who suggest that something is different and because it is the idea of a minority doesnt mean it is not true. Galileo Galilee suggested the Earth revolved around the sun which was different from the accepted concept that the Sun revolved around the Earth. Einstein theorized relativity and other astronomical proposals which turned out to be true. All theories of a smaller number.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
But people wont believe that an adverse theory is true because they are too stubborn out of their own devotion to the original theory especially if it is generally accepted but soon it will inevitably be espoused as a valid hypothesis.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Exposing you vaginal lips and tits is NOT THE SAME as cheekily asking the stones a funny question in a gingham bra with 90% of my body covered. I'm covered up to the wrists in many of my videos are you blind? You need to be blaming the media and the rapidly wanning magazine retouch culture-none of my photos are even airbrushed! Don't blame someone's who's fully clothed!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Im not blind. What makes exposing a vagina and exposing breast any different if they are meant for the same purpose. It is just the societal shock which comes from it. I am pretty sure that back then breasts werent to be exposed but then it was generally accepted and people like you do it and defend it.
I wonder what would happen if I just expose my penis while cheekily asking Angelina Jolie a question on why she adopts babies all of the time.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
I am not showing or exposing anything, it's suggestive. where are the nipples, the aureoles?
A penis, btw, is a VERY controversial symbol much more so then the breasts!!You have realize that's why you rarely see them in mainstream films but you see full frontal women naked. If you asked her with an obvious hard on, fully dressed it would be funny.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
I think I am being misinterpreted because based on the logic which you think I am disclosing then a woman in a bathing suit going to the beach is being sexually suggestive.
But the thing is that when it is being done for marketing something or to grab attention then what is the difference?
They are both the same. Showing your breast to appeal to our sexual urges and me showing my penis to appeal to the same urges is the same thing, one is just more covered up.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
THE COVERING UP IS THE DIFFERENCE! you just are part of a generation where mainstreamed hardcore porn is the norm so you never knew the world without.Living through it and reading about it are two different things.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Logic doesn't change with the generation. Logic is consistent and is out of bounds from time.
I dont need to be in a certain generation to know that exposing two body parts for the same reason are equally the same.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Its not the body part that is exposed that make it such a big deal in my opinion, it is just the violation of morals and values which makes it so shocking. People have their religious values and other views on what is right and wrong which is what makes something so shocking. People exposing sex organs and their breasts are in the same category. I dont care what the media accepts and I dont go by what it accepts because it is the most corrupt and most immoral group in our culture.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
" People have their religious values and other views on what is right and wrong which is what makes something so shocking."
well they are not MY values or morals. Besides,there is some SERIOUS smut in the bible and in a lot of religions they just are complete hypocrites.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Well since it isn't your religious values then what values or what opinion do you have that make you see vagina and breast exposure as different.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
with that logic then a large breasted &small waisted long limbed girl with full hips, FULLY DRESSED, would be considered immoral simply for having a traditionally sexually enticing figure.catholics molest simple beacuse they can't control (or 'legally' relive) natural urges that are perfectly normal but because they obsess and make it taboo it becomes a source of shame and ultimately lust and sadly abuse against those who are helpless like children.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
No that is totally different and I think that is ridiculous. You cannot say that a woman or a man's is immoral because of the way he or she is shaped. That is totally out of bounds.
Biologically if they have a sexually enticing body that is due to our natural preferences of sexual attraction and the cultural preferences as well.
But if that buxom woman was to expose her breasts for the sake of marketing or getting attention then that is arguable.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
u know what. I'm tired of seeing women who are saying that they are something more to say and hate being objectified when they just play up to the societal stereotypes. I am not questioning the intellectual capacity of this women nor am I doubting her political involvement but she is appealing to men by showing her boobs.
Seriously, if you want some respect then you need to show that you don't have to objectify yourself to get what you want.
If I had something to say I won't show my penis.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
"I'm tired of seeing women who are saying that they are something more to say and hate being objectified"
Well that certainly is not me!
Appealing to men (and woman and a few transgender folks) with boobs is fine in my book. Boobs are a happy thing that make people smile. Everything i do is tasteful and above board, never raunchy and usually witty.
MY compliant is the pussyscat dolls crap where it's just sheer airheads who can barely speak and who are 100% manufactured.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Yes boobs make people happy and excited. But is that seriously what you are doing? I mean yes that is true but that isn't how it is utilized honestly.
And you can tell. Because you dont use boobs in videos like this. You just show a still image of your rack and you use it as the immediate thumbnail image of your video to attract people.
It isn't used in your act which I clearly don't see, it is used to attract viewers and not to make people happy. That's just an excuse.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
"Because you don't use boobs in videos like this. You just show a still image of your rack and you use it as the immediate thumbnail image of your video to attract people."
Dude! This video is an anomaly, I make industrials about my tits! haha You have obviously not watched any of my other videos, especially Boobs Gone Wild, Boobs and List Boobs and Bach and Does this Bikini make my boobs and butt look big?the middle icon plays to the gallery true, but this is showbiz!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
I am not going to watch all a hundred of your videos to find out if this is an anamoly especially when the majority of your videos is just used to attract men or people who find breasts pleasing.
I am not concerned with the objectification even though there may be little there in the content (may seem contradictory), but many people just see boobs which is what I'm saying.
But you had to attract viewers by showing your breasts.
And the showbiz excuse doesn't make something right.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Fair enough but showbiz is showbiz and every stripper from Mick Jagger to Miley Cyrus has gotta gimmick! We can't all be Alison Krauss !!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Why can't you be Alison Krauss? Why can't you be sans-gimmick? The event that one person has not used a gimmick and became successful proves that it is possible.
Either you need to use a gimmick or you find it easier to use a gimmick. Or you are a hypocrite.
Women who are good looking can be remembered for doing something else besides modeling in a magazine for the male demographic but in the end they are known for their gimmick and that is inevitable.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Because Alison Krauss, Paul Robeson etc those are very rare performers whose raw talent eclipse their image &who have to have it that way.Judy Garland was equally talented yet her image coexisted as a giant alongside her talent so much that people were attracted to the emotional fragility of her presence as they were to her voice.You can't control those things as performer, they decided for you by dna encoding. Townshend too,the greatest rock star if them all, has to break that guitar to bits!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Too many people are famous alone from their shock factor. Miley Cyrus isn't talented in my opinion but at the end of the day she wouldn't go down as a legend. She is just another Disney created person and people will recognize that and because she had nothing else to bring to the table she will be forgotten.
And sometimes the person has something behind the gimmick and the shock factor and that is fine. Mike Jagger has his marijuana and his nontraditional behavior but good music to follow it
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Well sadly the media is keeping these bubblegum one hit wonder alive for years like a swine flu from the 1920's in a petri dish, keeping it around to make money hand over fist without letting truly incredible musicians and talents out there.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Oh and besides look at your tags. When I type in big boobs which I admittedly had done your videos pop up all of the time and I admit I am tempted.
But I see some of your videos and what is the act you claim? Posing with bikinis or walking around with your boobs exposed? What is that act? You can put a name on anything but it isn't going to change the content.
I agree with the Pussycat Dolls but are you so different.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
The tags make me laugh, sometimes I include very random things and laugh even harder.
"What is that act?" The act is that I'm almost 5'10, very stacked and brunette.U will not find ANY women in the media or magazines who are tall with hourglass figures today. That reason alone makes me proud as I receive fan mail from men AND women who are very happy to see someone enjoying themselves, being witty, healthy and not buying into size zero hip less anorexia culture.The mis en scence is also popular.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
But what are in your tags? What are in your tags that are used intentionally to attract viewers? big boobs.
That is explicit but now that I know your true purpose it can be used to show off your cause.
But I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about you muffling what you have to say with your physical attractiveness.
You have something to say but nobody is going to see that because you are just coming off as the stereotypical, suppressed women using breasts to try to get something done.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
"stereotypical, suppressed women using breasts to try to get something done."
No, no one else would agree with you. The boobs may come of as a one trick Pony but suppression and muffling don't enter into it.And i am a mint original unlike 90% of the rip off pop cultural strip miners today. I just say what i want about things that concern me elsewhere. if i've learned anything it's that some of the most boring and annoying performers were once hot and then they became political and preachy.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
It is stereotypical because women have been suppressed for so long that they are using any method they can to try to get noticed.
Women are suppressed despite the rights they are given. It is only an illusion, perhaps because it is right or just to subdue the women with the satisfaction of acquiring something.
Women voluntarily allow this to happen because no public woman is willing to shine by using another method which just perpetuates the suppression.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Blame madonna,a narcissist who brought the common denominator down to working out and fixation on fashion,hair&acting like a whore in public &that's the legacy women have been handed by the media. A work out body and expensive clothing is more important to today's society then a college degree whereas it used to only get your foot in the door.The woman you described would be scoffed at.
IT'S ALL ABOUT GETTING WOMEN TO CONSUME AND BE MATERIALISTS! I"M VERY VOCAL ABOUT BEING AN ANTI-MATERIALIST!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Okay but you are only an anti-materialist but you still stoop to her standards.
You dont need to make the standard to be as wrong when you follow the standard.
It would be a lot more rewarding if you were to just use your raw talent to get your foot through the door and then if you need to use a gimmick then use a gimmick.
As far as I'm concerned which you most likely don't care about, you are the same as them.
Stick out because you are much more meaningful than Madonna and I agree.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
If you are really 19 then you don't remember what and how foul and low madonna's standards have been, she acted and posed like acomplete and utter slut, vagina shots, ugly micro tits topless in public,mini cone bra, talking about her sex life graphically, peeing on herself and talking about it on Letterman , hanging out with trash 24/7. I DO NOT STOOP THAT LOW OR EVEN CLOSE! PUHLEASE!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
lmfao. I know about the other stuff but pissing on herself and other things I didnt know.
But we all can see ourselves as higher than another person because of certain actions but the concept is in fact the same.
That was her meal ticket. she used that to get her way and guess what that is all she is remembered for. Yes she has money and all of the fame but that cannot cover up what she really is and it shows and when she dies she will be remembered for that, not her money and not her cars.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
What she really is a very Catholic and greedy person whom the media safe guards (she is one with the media in many ways) and protects, she is the ultimate Reagan era relic, she won't be remembered by my children.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Okay your not pissing on yourself but she used all of that as her meal ticket to rope in fans with shock value and using her sexuality and her societal deviance to try to get what she wanted.
You don't do that but that doesn't make you any better IN THIS CASE.
You perhaps are a better human being but when it comes to this you two are in the same boat.
What is the difference in one person using their breast (societal sex organs) and one person flashing their clad vagina?
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
There is too much arrogance when it comes to people and we all do it and its unfortunate and ignorant because if we can take a stop, to look at the big picture we will see how our actions are similar.
Christians look down upon the Islamic Jihadists of Al'Qaeda as if there isn't a combative bone in their bodies, but what about the Crusades. It's relativism but what that can mean is prejudice but our illogical and ignorant bias doesn't validate our perspectives.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
well the crusades were many many moons ago.
The people in Mumbai recently and many other jihadists (NOT to be confused with Muslims)are perfectly willing to blow up the planet perhaps as a reaction to right wing Christian paranoid style in Western politics or perhaps because it's their goal. They sadly could care less about 'the big picture' you speak of.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
No. I am not talking about the "big picture" I am just speaking on how everything is relative. What you think is not what I think.
What they think is not what others think. But I'm going to look up that Mumbai situation. Sounds interesting. People blowing up the world.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
But some of the evidence for my point is just so obvious and to even deny it is just being stubborn. Your using sex as your meal ticket. Breasts may not be anatomical sex organs but they do get people excited and have culturally been identified with sex.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
"Your using sex as your meal ticket.'
How I make money has nothing to do with my breasts currently.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Semantics?
It is your way to get views for youtube not to take earn income.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
You dont see any correlation between the video pictures and the views?
and look at this numerical disparity: Bikini Video 2008 Super Amanda, 24,889 views in 3 months.
Super Amanda Loves Malcolm: 5,096 views in 7 months.
It isnt mere coincidence that this is a ploy that you intentionally plotted.
I cant understand that you can dispute with fact but the numbers dont lie.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
The middle icon did not show up in malcolm's tribute or it would have had more views. marketing is marketing, jeez, you might want to live in North Korea!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Its kind of like what you said to me hours and hours ago. You said something about society or the media accepting raunchiness as empowering sexuality or femininity.
But Marketing is your case and in the case of many women or people who use it to exploit women is just a way to continuously objectify women and exploit women by objectifying them just to appeal to males. It's all relativism as you can see. The person doing something is most likely going to think it is right especially with labels
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
"..it to exploit women is just a way to continuously objectify women and exploit women by objectifying them just to appeal to males."
No, that is only a very small part of it for me. We are genetically wired over the past million years or so. some things are pointless to challenge or analyze. what i do appeals on many different levels.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Yes we are genetically wired over the past thousands of years we have been on this earth but what does that say in your defense? I know many things it can say and they do pertain to the case but it is more subconsciously than intentional.
But you were hardwired to show your boobs to appeal to males just to get attention. Yes that is possible but this isn't irresistible. That is something you are able to deviate from as opposed to not drinking water or eating, essential human needs.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
You are not me. First lesson of any good artist is that you don't make people's choices and decisions for them, that's called fascism.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Out of curiosity how does what you are doing appeals to people on what levels?
In the case of flaunting your breastesses (I misspelled it on purpose for a not so comic effect), but it appeals predominantly to the sexual awareness of males or people who just like breasts.
Enlighten me if I am wrong.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Wrong, million of females both straight and gay (and bi) love breasts and are into breast fetishism. Half the fan mail i get is from women. For every reason under the sun ,breasts appeal to millions perhaps billion of people. it's how we are fed when we pop out for Christ sake as well as other cultural and atheistic factors that I won't waste my life trying analyze!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Okay. You have proven my point which you have been doing in mostly all of your comments. Okay, so maybe you dont appeal to only men and I have accepted that in my comment or people who just like breasts but either way you are appealing to their sexual desires which doesnt disprove me or support your point. A sexual fetish is a sexual attraction towards an object to help get attention in what you call and what could be marketing.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
I never said it isn't marketing, I just said it isn't pornographic, explicit or raunchy.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
And again you are appealing to their sexual tendencies or their devotion to a certain object as in fetishism instead of grabbing their attention in another way which pertains to the point of your video. I dont see how breasts fetishism has to do with asking a question to the rolling stones or anything else like that. But what it seems like your doing is making a marketing scheme and then trying to substantiate it with profound and deeper reasons to make it more than what it is.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
You did not grow up living for nothing but the stones and The Who with The Stones nor does it appear you know much about the RST's VERY VERY sexual history.The kids in their teens who asked ?'s knew virtually nothing about the stones but i do. had I asked a question to the Who I would have dressed in something low cut but there would be no boob explosion middle icon.The Stones are the ULTIMATE embodiment of raw RnR satanic sexuality.They are a HUGE influence of mine!
Google Cocksucker Blues!!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Not to say that The Who don't have a huge amount of sexual energy in there music beacuse they do it's just much more subtle then the Stones.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
I know nothing about those two bands. I just know Mick Jagger but I don't see the point in this because you have boob explosions in most of your videos.
This explanation can definitely prove your case but not the case of any others.
I agree because depending on who you are talking to or about or where your going you dress in a particular way. You wouldn't go to church dressed in a dominatrix outfit or having a conversation with a pastor. So I agree with you
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Ok, it would not be a super Amanda video without the explosions and that's kind of where the issue lies. I've seen a huge shift in pop culture trends in my life time and you've barely lived through one generation and have always had the internet. there was innocence and class once in pop culture and even advertising-it was the norm and hot and heavy sex stuff was left for films and X rated theaters and the underground where it belongs.
My stuff is innocent.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
I can live in one generation and still know another one has existed. I even said that all of this explicit sexuality wasn't publicized like this and was even condemned if put out and was discouraged from exhibiting.
Where has it all gone down hill from? What was the changing point? That is what I don't know but I am sure you can tell me since you lived in many generations (dont want to make you sound old or anything).
But you undoubtedly conformed to this generation's standards.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
No!only about2)These are the key points where things went downhill:
MTV and the concept of music artist as cash cow and over exposed commodity,Madonna(as before)&the glut of personal trainers, celebrities walking around naked to get attention and being RESPECTED&PROTECTED by the media for it, reality TV,also spawned by Mtv and Madonna couple that with the Reagan era bling culture&society&pop culture just became cheap, vulgar&greedy artists now are not-few have any talent,originality orclass.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
and now look at the picture of this video which isn't an act or a movie, its a question and you still put breasts as your picture.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Yes, it's a SUPER AMANDA video! and the stones are all about sex! Jeez take Mick to task while you're at it. Don't be so sexist! ;)
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
I'm not sexist at all. I don't listen to the stones but I did listen to this one recent song that you probably know: Has Anybody Seen My Baby. I love the imagery in the video and the song is stuck in my head. I find myself singing it all of the time.
I also like the lyrics.
I don't mind sexually explicit lyrics only if they are done in a tasteful manner. You know. I dont like songs that are like: Fuck. Fuck Fuck. Tits. Ass. and that is all it is.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
well that's about 85% of the stones catalog if you read between the lines kootch, sex, drugs, drugs, Satan, pussy, coke, hash, junk, tits, groupies, cumming etc sorry tp be so graphic but Mick and Keef wrote the book on the raunchy rock n roll fuck song!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Oh i didnt know the Stones were into sex with the song you were singing. I know the chorus now.
Oh and i thought their famous logo of the lips was to warn audiophiles and aficionados of gingivitis.
But in this entire long-winded argument you could of told me that I am as equally bad as you are (in my opinion).
I am the person who had looked on your video, tallying up your views, and continuing something which I am against. Well people are all hypocrites and I'm human so I'm guilty.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
hahha funny!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
You know what. We could continue this debate if you want to because I can talk about this all of the time. It benefits me and I need this cognitive stimulus because I feel that my brain is lagging a bit.
And I like arguments like this. It expands my mental capacities.
And now I can look at you in a different light now. You are not just dimwitted woman with big boobs. You actually have meaning and worth and have something to say.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
If I hurt you in anyway I apologize. I assume I haven't and you probably ignored it because you are strong willed and satisfied with what you do.
But I hope I see you living your dreams. I wish you all of the success and wish you can be all that you can be.
Good luck on your album and hopefully you can change things for the better.
Don't let anybody put you down and always put higher standards for yourself.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Thanks but i am always happy to debate, no worries. sometimes i step away from my computer or I don't have access to it like when I'm in the UK.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
It's evident. How do I get people to notice me and my message? I will put a long jacket on and then make my tags the message portrayed.
But not in the majority of the cases and especially yours. It may seem like a psychological strategy to attract viewers but it isn't. Its the only hope of getting viewers.
And I believe you have something to say but nobody will hear your concerns in the way you are dressed which is scanty and revealing to obvious parts which is sexually exploitative IMHO.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Well they will listen now! But even if i had entered into this wearing a turtleneck and no makeup at my webcam vlogging there are always people who watch videos and respond. even to females who are NOT booby.hell, there is a whole cult of guys who like mousy typesaka mosueburger! Guys just are attracted to women period as you well know. I say the important stuff ELSEWHERE and do not multitask. Boobs in one place, politics in one place, endangered species rights, nanny rights in one place etc
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Of course they will listen now. You had your gimmick which you immediately used. I will understand if you need to resort to a gimmick when all else fails but it seems like you initially used a gimmick before your true talent shined through.
Do you need to use a gimmick? Just admit it because you kind of implicitly done so.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Yes they are going to listen now because you roped them in with your boobs and your figure. Not because of your intellectual capacity or your environmental involvement. The people that know you now on youtube are people who know you because of your figure. It happens to so many people and women and this is what they became known for.
Not the good they do. Their image and they use it intentionally to their advantage because they have the other way of getting fans. It's unfortunate but true.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Chapter 2 on my responses.
Sure they are some group created by the industry to make money but they are part of a trend. (I hate trends and how people are slaves to the trends).
But you are obviously a slave to the trend of objectifying women. It's a shame because you have so much going for you and you have a purpose but you are just reducing yourself to eye candy. No act. Just boobs.
That's my point. You are squandered talent. I'm not just some sex-crazed male. but I guess you got what u want
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Bottom line:the whole rationalizing of being sexy as empowering mostly is a false excuse for raunch culture that Ari Levy wrote about in FemaleChauvinistPigs this is because exploitation is never positive &the 'empowerment' is fleeting(as sadly witnessed in the aging and desperate carcass of madonna the godmother of ho-culture & exploitation without camp)
I DON'T EXPLOIT &I AM VERY CAMPY therefore I am truly empowered by what i do as there is obvious joy, mystery &interest on the part of others.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
I agree with you and I learned something from you and what you believe is true about yourself, your empowerment and exploitation isn't evident.
What is evident is your exploitation of your physical attractiveness which is so obvious.
You dont need to do sexual acts or overtly do sexual things to be objectified. When you are just look at for your physical attractiveness and nothing more then you are being objectified sexually.
This pertains to many of your videos and not all of them.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
"Seriously, if you want some respect then you need to show that you don't have to objectify yourself to get what you want."
I have respect, it's not something I seek from others AND I have what I want.I think what you are saying is that that my shtick seems predictable and that's your opinion. I happen too like, w/out bothering to analyze why,
the aesthetic of the NATURALLY large breasted happy Amazon girl ala Russ Meyer.I hate over analyzing desires is mankind's modern curse&passion killer.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
No you obviously have something to say. I actually took the couple of seconds of my time to read your page and it didn't have normal stereotypical hobbies, occupations or interests. It actually had some valuable and meaningful things.
But you don't grab your attention with saying something or with a picture of your face or anything else. You show your boobs. You can try to cover it up with some type of explanation but the evidence is clearyou get attention with your rack and that is your point.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
Bottom line: Dude you are complaining about boobs. Why?
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
I am not complaining about boobs whatsoever. I just hate the fact that women just need to get attention or attract viewers by having their immediate picture as a huge rack.
I like boobs. :)
But I mean it takes much more than somebody teasing with their rack to get me excited so its really nothing.
When people go to your videos it isn't to hear what you are talking about. That's just a plus that they might listen to after they are done wanking off. They just come to see the boobs.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
"...they might listen to after they are done wanking off. They just come to see the boobs."
And that's ok. Truly. No one in my videos is ever raped, tortured, bound pretending to like various and sundry objects shoved up into every orifice or faking an orgasm.There needs to be alternate sources of racy material to remind society that it's not all about the money shot.Despite NOT being anti-porn, i don't do porn or webcam for this very reason as 90% of the time it isn't fun or sensual to watch.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
This is obviously a clash between two different opinions in two different topics.
I am saying that it is so predictable for a woman to get the attention of a man using her boobs without using her intellect. Unfortunately that is what women do and that is what it appears that you are doing.
But while you are also celebrating your figure (which I commend), you also exploit your figure for the purpose of sending a message.
Just like putting an apple between your breasts. What's the purpose?
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
It was in honour of Rene Magritte and Anna Nicole Smith had just died! I wrote along rambling tribute on my blog about her. She became exploitive and she paid with her life and I found that sad. Yet she was VERY campy and made fun of herself so there you go.I also like the lighting and the colours in that video and others. Look up Mis-En-Scene. "What is put into a scene" it's what I live for despite a small camera and very limited budget.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Hopefully you will make it and can get better equipment but you work with what you have but I don't see what the tribute in having an apple in between your breasts? lmfao.
please explain because anna nicole smith's modest look at herself and your stint doesn't make sense to me
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
I don't want it to make sense to you. i want people to say "I don't get her" just as much as people think it's cool. It's very Pythonesque and more British, my sense of humour.There were these vlog tributes to her of boring people talking and photo slide shows and i thought do something funny,Magritte along with Chagall is my favorite artist.
it's ok to NOT make sense!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
I didn't see being nonsensical wasn't okay. I just want to get the concept. If there is a pattern I want to get it.
I am not a trend follower. I dont follow trends. This female objectification trend I don't like and that is the reason why I am engaged in this dispute with you .
I hate today's pop culture. I like intellectualism, education, and when there is time some entertainment. I am an anti-materialist. I value the abstract things and most importantly enlightenment.
THEVIDEOARBITRATOR 3 years ago
ok, me too, I just do it differently then you.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Uh... A lot of drugs? Brian Jones probably was so overdosed that he couldn't hold a tune(or a mike).
Winkblinkone 3 years ago
test
The0neAnd0nlyRV2 3 years ago
You wanna put a wee space between your words, Superamanda.
bollockowithalob 3 years ago
I bet you have to do barrel loads of drugs to get the boot from the stones old Keef even snorted his dads ashes and smoked spiders webs in a joint
oodled 3 years ago
such a MILF omg1
MmoInfo 3 years ago
haha not now but we are working on it!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
;O I watch it again.. wow, DO WANT. How much? ;]
MmoInfo 3 years ago
wow did they ever answere ya ? what is up with those boobs , are they yours or what got me confused a tad ,
MyPinkRainbow 3 years ago
your hot
Nastalio 3 years ago
For 1967-69, Brian was ahead of his time in the group in terms of drug abuse- doing horse tranquilizer, on top of acid, on top of booze, etc. Except for occasionally acid, no one else in the band really did that many drugs at the time (Keith didn't get into Heroin til '69, but had the constitution for it. Brian couldn't handle anything, therefore making him musically expendable).
steveconn 3 years ago
we need more chicks like you in this world! :) frof
luvinlife33 3 years ago
wasnt really paying attention to the video, but trust me, u just made a 16 year old's fantasy almost come true, <3 ty.
FreshMilk1 3 years ago
brian was kicked because he couldnt tour america because of drug busts. and for being sort of useless.
SEANDI777 3 years ago
please don't diss Jones. He was a very good musician and died without full credit for his work with the Stones. His death was perhaps the single most tragic death in Rock.
manfred62493 3 years ago
I agree don't diss a musical genius.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
OMG im in 8th grade and i taped a keith picture to myself sooo awesome but NOBODY knew who he was
DonTrustZepHaters 3 years ago
The best Keef pic is 'patience please a drug free America comes first' portrait and the early shots from LP covers-What a handsome hunk a riffhard he is!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
LOL i know thats the best picture ever
DonTrustZepHaters 3 years ago
Brian Jones was kicked out of the band because he became un reliable, unstable and could barely play the guitar anymore. The Stones needed to move on.
tonno80 3 years ago
ur hot, take off that shirt and show us dem boobies
RathalosRocker 3 years ago
Hmm, the flower's not blossoming ... maybe yuh need tuh SCREAM AT IT A LITTLE LOUDER ... DEE-DEE-DEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
mythmanjay 3 years ago
well the thing is, keith richards would get super fucked up on heroin and shit, and im sure the rest of the guys drank a lot, but in the studio they pretty much kept it clean, brian would come in all fucked up and would pass out during sessions, and he became quite a drag to be w as time went on, the other members of the band would usually get their kicks when the tours would stop and before they had to enter the studio, brian would just get fucked all the time, and then there was his ego...
stashJ8 3 years ago
I think she was a student of Timmothy Oleary !
ukraininoak 3 years ago
you are weird....
Yesitis808 3 years ago
Maybe ... but WE LIKE IT!
mythmanjay 3 years ago
"WE LIKE IT"? Who is "WE"? Super Amanda´s another nickname/s? :-)
youwannabecool 3 years ago
as in fans.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
why was this flagged? oh please there are just some complete frigid prudes out there! leave it to a bunch of you tubers to flag a beautiful and funny woman with tastefully displayed cleavage. I guess skanky bleached blonds with silicone or video games violences only translates to some of you losers.
felinekittyjukebox 3 years ago
good ? but he was out of control
qtips3 3 years ago
tubemeokay : after reading some of the other comments you've left me i highly recommend that you keep your comments to Holocaust denying and KKK women's auxiliary groups. you belong with human refuse like that!
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
damn kinda wanna jizz on her lips. didnt pay attention to what she said but who cares right? :p
blafuckyou 3 years ago
You bitch, wasnt even born back in the day and you think you can talk to them like that.
BTW, the tittys doesnt make the girl, haveing some fucking brains...MIGHT!! Big titted LOSER!!
tubemeokay 3 years ago
whatever asswipe what's so depressing is that so many of you fake groveling stones fans approach them like you're addressing city hall or some supreme court justice that sort of goes against their original message--duh asshole(s)... you are an insipid/mindless slave if you take rock stars seriously. And I'm more of a stones fan than you will EVER BE, words can't describe it certainly not the ones that your 54 year old hateful self chooses.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
tubemeoky you should be shot through the head at point black range and trampled underfoot.
aurafura 3 years ago
You might be a smart girl, but in this video it doesn´t seem so.
amaskiea 3 years ago
actually it does. I have a booming and clear broadcaster's voice and considering I did this all in one take with no tripod I'm pretty damn articulate AND I have titties. You are just pissed off and leaving your sundry generic hater comments because I'm happy and have stuff going on an you don't have jack.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
:-) Oh, my god! :-)))
amaskiea 3 years ago
No sense, no humor, no point, no anything...
amaskiea 3 years ago
No sense, no humor, no point, no anything.
amaskiea 3 years ago
how much silicon do you have to put into your body to show off your clevage, fake people being critical of fake people isn't a waste of time.
ThingNation 3 years ago
"Silicon?" Oh please, a plastic surgeon can't even come close to endowing someone with what nature gave me. I'm not fake at all, this is a joke and you are a humorless relic.
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
good question, even better tits :P
tempy1991 3 years ago
It's all in the biographies and interviews, Amanda. Work indeed seems to have suffered. Being in a band is a professional job as any other. My feeling is that they may have underestimated his talent, and tried harder to keep him in the band, but that's just an opinion.
zzxqxzz 3 years ago
This is not to be taken too seriously...
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
i think i can speak for the stones as i say,
as soon as the music / work suffers from the abuse, it´s time to quit the drugs or the art.
mastalucas 3 years ago
yep, that's what I heard.
nealmayborn 3 years ago
What? no one can 'speak for The Stones!'
BrickLaneBetty 3 years ago
Oh wow, amazing and slamming body, you turned me on.
What was the video about again?
heeey06 3 years ago