Documentary of BYU Physics Prof. Steven Jones (Part 1)

[Origin305]

could be just a coincidence but is Jones literally back against the wall in this video? the man is probably in trouble.

[AndrewJ254]

i am glad some people have the guts to do what's right.

he is simply stating facts.

he did not just pick up the dust from the demolitions, i mean collapses ;-) and say hmm, this has signs of explosives in it, lol.

thanks for taking time to examine the dust particles and revealing the truth

[mendyleve]

thanks professor, making me proud to have graduated BYU :} it is so obvious once one looks into the facts, i just wish more people would!

[Origin305]

posted it on facebook. I hope these videos get more viewing cause people have to see this.

[Origin305]

great video, why only 1K views??

make this more public!!!

[Sixalienasa]

I believe that the planes impacting the buildings would have enough kinetic energy to render the structures unstable enough to cause them to collapse.

[Zuel7227]

Even if that is the case it would not account for the free fall collapsed speed of the North and South towers.

[Sixalienasa]

@Zuel7227 I am afraid I am ignorant of what the North and South Towers are. I presume you are refering to other buildings than the Twin Towers.

Look up on Boeings site what one of those Planes weighs.

The weight of the fuel carried not to mention its explosive energy.

Its top speed.

Multiply them together, and take a good long look at the Kinetic energy involved in the answer. Not taking into account the explosive energy involved.

Dont cast it aside, just go do the calculations. ;-)2010

[Zuel7227]

You know what the North and South Towers are they were the twin towers that got hit. I imagine the maths involved with kinetic energy and plane impacts are quite impressive. But the designers who made these buildings took into account planes hitting them and the bigegst ones at the time of construction was a boeing 707 which of similar size and weight of both planes used on 9/11, and they have spoke saying that the buildings could not have come down to planes and fires alone.

[Zuel7227]

But you are not wrong to highlight kinetic energy, the steel used in construction has been destroyed and negates the possibiltiy of a more detailed forensic examination.

[Sixalienasa]

@Zuel7227

I saw an expiriment here on the Toob with a Phantom Jet Fighter, which hit a concrete wall at 500MPH. It was vaporised. Do you have an idea of the Kinetic energy involved? Do me and yourself a favor and go and do the Calculations. Dont mind what the designers said for the moment. Do the math Dude. so that you will get an idea of the forces involved. It is actually staggering. You can still hold on to your theories if you like afterward, but you will be looking at both sides.

[Zuel7227]

@Sixalienasa I've had a chance to look at the calculations looking at Joules and Kilowatts per hour. The plane that hit the second tower flight 175 a boeing 767 was doing roughly 500mph, weighing 140000 kgs a closely estimated guess. It would have created a Kinetic force of 3,388,000,000 Joules or 941 Kw/H even at Maximum speed (530mph) and fully loaded weight (180000kg) 5,055,210,000 or 1405 Kw/H.

[Zuel7227]

Compare that to the 707 which is 152000 Kg flying max weight at 500mph its Kinetic forces would be 3,678,400,000 joules or 1022 Kw/H a 707 max speed is 607 mph quite a bit faster than the 767 that was 5,622,754,000 joules or 1562Kw/h. Impressive numbers but I was looking at wind bearing loads for the twin towers and it seems that in order to structually unstable the them it would require a force at a minimum of anthing between 50000 and 150000 Kw/h so thiers quite a gap, let me know your ideas

[Sixalienasa]

@Zuel7227 I was surprised to see that the 707 had a cruising speed of over 500 mph. Boeing always did make efficient aircraft. A friend of mine was at one time in the British Army Tank Regiment. While on exercises one day, he fired a BB Pistol at the armoured window of an APC. He was thinking just to have a laugh with his mate driving the APC. But to his surprise the window shattered. If you know anything about the British Army you will imagine the Hullabaloo that ensued.

[Sixalienasa]

@Zuel7227 not sure if the other part of this went through. But anyway he was involved in a series of tests to determine how a BB could shatter an armoured window of an APC. They did all sorts of tests hitting the window with bullets to even pieces of coal thrown at it. The Scientists decided that there had to have been some sort of resonant vibration action on the window at the time of the impact of the BB, which led it to shatter. Perhaps because of the powerful engines of the APC.

[Sixalienasa]

It is certainly better to explore all avenues when looking for a cause, before arriving at a conclusion. There are forces in operation in the fundamental elements of this Universe, Gods creation, that we have not the slightest inkling of. Look at the Bumblebee, scientists assert that it cannot fly due to its size weight shape. But it flies. Perhaps it is using forces which are on the atomic level rather than on the molecular level. Who knows?

[Zuel7227]

I think glass and steel have different properties to resonat frequencies but I think we have discovered that the 707 and 767 have equal kinetic forces and it shows in the numbers. The real answers to any questions that are being raised is in the steel columns and I believe even after the Offical Report of NIST, those beams should have been preserved for future forensic examination and detailed analysis the fact most of it has been destroyed illegally raises some questions of a cover up alone

[Sixalienasa]

@Zuel7227 Apart from all this very amateur engineering, why do you think anyone in Ametica would want to do such a thing? I just dont see any reason for it. If a reason is needed for an invasion of another country wouldnt it make sense to find a reason outside the States. I frimly believe that when those planes hit the towers, that when they didnt blow up and fall down immediately, the cry went up; Inside Job. You are all playing into Bin Ladens hands. He is being used by the Oil Barons.

[vicegripp]

@Sixalienasa No that makes no sense. You need to understand the law to understand the rules of engagement for war. In order to wage war legally you have to declare it, which you have to prove that a country willfully attacked ours. If it's a national security threat, because of certain amendments the President can use military force but it's supposed to be for only up to 90 days. Bin Laden was trained by the CIA. These are facts. Look them up.

[Sixalienasa]

@vicegripp Who wages war legally Dude? The Big Hitters see that as the mark of a fool. The way to wage war now is to beat them before they even know that they are at war. You need to move into the modern age of war Dude.

[vicegripp]

@Sixalienasa yeah i understand that but just cuz its the reality of the times don't make it the correct way to do things ya dig wat im saying?? im all for having no laws but where are the repercussions for all these mutha fukkas on top gonna come from? reminds me of the Dave Chapelle skit where he switched the way CEO's and drug dealers face prosecution hahaha that shit was ingenious.

[Sixalienasa]

@vicegripp I am not for one moment saying that it is the correct way to do things, but as you say it is the reality of the times and they need to adjust to win. I can not agree with you about having no laws, because isnt that what they are doing? In the Book of Mormon it states that; The Word of God had more effect in changing the hearts of the people than even the sword. I'm paraphrasing btw.

[vicegripp]

@Sixalienasa lol Mormons are fukkin insane, bad choice of reference imo.. people do need to adjust why u think these radical political groups hate our government? u can't try to police and influence the world when no one wants u to and think there isn't gonna be negative repercussions.. the CIA calls it "blow back"

[Sixalienasa]

@Zuel7227 I did it the simple way.

Not taking into account the explosive power of the Aviation Fuel on board, which is not like the Gas in your car, 140,000Kgs X 500MPH = 70,000,000.KgMPH. I wonder why the building didnt go down sooner. BTW, have you done the Calcs. for the 707? Another BTW a very different aircraft. 50's Technology Vrs 90's.

I dont have the Specs for the 707 but the Top Speed would be somewhat lower. Thank you for taking the time to do the Calcs.

[Zuel7227]

@Sixalienasa I have the Calcs for the 707 on here., it shows the top speed and max weight that both planes can take off in. And if you use them numbers and divide KE you can work out how much force they impact at. 707 is more powerful than the 767. But in order for the impact to have max damage all that energy must be aimed at the core columns, and its been tested by structual engineers how much energy would transfer from impact to core columns and I believe they varied from 30 to 60%

[Sixalienasa]

By the way, it was the Phantom which was vaporised not the Concrete Block.