@batlin I'm not sure about photoreading, but I do know that many techniques that they teach in speed reading does improve your reading speed to at least 3-4 times faster, if not more. I've recently began a 36 chapter book on rapid reading, and after 6 chapters, I've already doubled my speed. So I think it is "possible." Whether his particular teaching method is effective or not, I'm not sure, but many people who do practice speed reading do read that fast with great comprehension.
@kooritsuki What before and after speeds are you talking about? Believe me, I would like to believe it more than anyone - I even wrote a rapid serial visual presentation program to experiment with reading bigger blocks of words. But until there is decent evidence that speed can go up (above even 400-500wpm) without damaging comprehension, we just have lots and lots of "it made me 3/4/5/10 faster, trust me!" claims.
I really do want speed reading to work, but so far the evidence is poor :/
@batlin I'm not sure of your question. I'm talking about speeds prior to speed reading exercises and after. Obviously, comprehension will be compromised if you practice only speed. But a good speed reading program should have exercises on both speed and retention; otherwise, there's really no point. I still think it's achievable.
@batlin As with the program you developed, I'm not sure how yours work, but there are several computer programs out there trying to improve reading speed for people, but I find them generally ineffective as most of them flashes words/phrases/paragraphs on the monitor, and all it does was just irritates the eyes instead of helping, imo.
@kooritsuki I meant, literally what speed did you have before you started, and what do you achieve now?
Re: the reading program, yes it's as you described it. I actually find it (usually) comfortable to read blocks of 3 words at a time, but I leave it set at 280-300wpm because my comprehension gets bad beyond that. Had to add rewind/forward buttons for when it happens.
@batlin ic, I started with 150-180wpm, and am at around 350-400wpm now with easy to average material. Right now, I'm pairing speed drills with comprehension drills and am finding it pretty good.
I've use that type of reading programs before, and was able to do around 5 words at a time no problem, except I couldn't do it for more than 2 - 3 mins at a time because it strains the eyes as it's on a computer screen flashing. I find it much better to practice on real paper.
like math.most asian good
davidboyman 8 months ago
这老师什么都教 。强人
luyefar 1 year ago
感謝分享
cimensan13 2 years ago
越老越不持久
706815903 2 years ago
I wish I could understand Chinese. What is the standard Chinese language that you can use basically everywhere?
viteminwater 2 years ago
跟训练照相记忆差不多= =可以说一样
pikaqiu888 2 years ago
pretty good skill! thanks!
zengrz 2 years ago
i think speed reading just good for read neswpaper and magazines...... not good for a student in his study
frankie238 3 years ago 2
not actually, its pretty useful to read at 1000 WPM ;D
leobody 2 years ago
true , technical material such as biology or physics may be difficult to understand
smokingsomeganja 2 years ago
看的快，記不得，有用嗎?一個小時給你拼命速讀1萬本書，你能記得多少？相信只記得幾本比較特別的書名吧，我就覺得真的不要浪費時間做這些訓練，在閱讀中需認真思考，思考過后相信所思考的東西將會銘記于心，還有看了這位老師的教學方式就沒什么信心，說話很慢，相信是大腦放映的比較慢，所以來不及迅速的思考出自己想表答什么.
wenwei07 3 years ago
看來你有所不知了
利用速讀法在一個小時內看完一萬本書且能理解到的我覺得沒甚麼可能=.=
但練成後以一小時看數本書，把內容理解而且能夠記下來卻是可以的
但能夠做到速讀的人不多，要不要練就自己選擇吧
ladeiv 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CHINKO!!
RichmanDEranGed 3 years ago
速读只是读书时候有用吧 学习是需要联想的
sdsh111 3 years ago
Thank you for sharing..I am going to try that
Jennywang0323 3 years ago
我记得黄健翔当时是通过念马路上的车牌号练口才的吧？
orochicc002 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck off u chinky bastard... wt the fuck are you on about... just sounds like a goat is fornicating to me. please die :| ingerland!
stellasbadmen 3 years ago
shut the fuck up you racist bastard!
are you one of those asian UK people who diss china because you think china is a low ranked country?
forgetaboutspellingg 3 years ago 5
I got the gist...
NOT!
myonlynick 3 years ago 2
如果你要获取知识的话，那么世界上是没有速读的，一个不容忽视的事实是，尤其在科学上，我们的学习分为两步，记忆和找关系，如果你要看懂一本教科书，那么你最好作的第一件事不是去练速度，而是准备好充分的时间先去记忆，然后第二步就是去找联系，如果遇到新的联系那么你还得去记忆新的联系．我问你，给你三个新事物且联系比较简单，你能在短时间内完全认识它吗？答案是＂能＂．对，那么如果给你五十件新事物，他们之间的关系也比较简单呢？你能完全认识他吗？当然能，只要花时间！如果关系也比较复杂的话，那你就得花更多的时间，所以在系统的学习上没有速读．速读是查漏补缺，去搜索问题答案的时候做的事．就象世界上是没有长生不老药一样，对速读的追求只会是徒劳的．人的自然能力决定这你的学习速度．
yypksfc 3 years ago
我覺得對學生來說是挺有用的,因為語文考試一分一秒都不可錯失,看文章時一定要快!
CWSILY 3 years ago
也就是說直接用視覺去記憶, 在看書的途中思考並不參與...
dddaaannny 3 years ago
我的感想是: 多讀點書, 增加文字辨認速度. 再試著把焦點慢慢放大 (整句整句看). 速度就可以加快了. (不過嚴格得說我這樣不能算速讀吧....)
dddaaannny 3 years ago
He is probably giving us a cake recipe, from what I could get from the book. I hope I can make the cake he suggests. I think my Chinese is improving.
zoozooyou 3 years ago
scaner
niansanlang 3 years ago
ok...good....now english.
333EvolutioN 3 years ago
ehm sure sure :|
autioooo 4 years ago
fan! fan ! fan ! fan ! fan ! oh cho ...and you're done
thats all got here!
izaak791 4 years ago
Read? I don't even know what he's saying!
lynnweida 4 years ago
他说的方法是做得道，但是要很努力去联系。
deviouszbabe 4 years ago
这样有什么用？
flybirds98 4 years ago
Im not going to listen to that fart
Zomggiggity 4 years ago
LOL
ebpm4life 4 years ago
眼睛根本不可能转的像你所说的那么快。
Looks dubious...
batlin 4 years ago
that is crap lol, Photoreading is 100x better , heard of that?
AkaGunmen 4 years ago
Yes I've heard of it and I don't see any proof at all that it works, nevermind being "100x better".
Do you have something real to add, other than just "xyz is 100x better" and a thumbs down for me?
batlin 4 years ago 7
@batlin I'm not sure about photoreading, but I do know that many techniques that they teach in speed reading does improve your reading speed to at least 3-4 times faster, if not more. I've recently began a 36 chapter book on rapid reading, and after 6 chapters, I've already doubled my speed. So I think it is "possible." Whether his particular teaching method is effective or not, I'm not sure, but many people who do practice speed reading do read that fast with great comprehension.
kooritsuki 1 year ago
@kooritsuki What before and after speeds are you talking about? Believe me, I would like to believe it more than anyone - I even wrote a rapid serial visual presentation program to experiment with reading bigger blocks of words. But until there is decent evidence that speed can go up (above even 400-500wpm) without damaging comprehension, we just have lots and lots of "it made me 3/4/5/10 faster, trust me!" claims.
I really do want speed reading to work, but so far the evidence is poor :/
batlin 1 year ago
@batlin I'm not sure of your question. I'm talking about speeds prior to speed reading exercises and after. Obviously, comprehension will be compromised if you practice only speed. But a good speed reading program should have exercises on both speed and retention; otherwise, there's really no point. I still think it's achievable.
kooritsuki 1 year ago
@batlin As with the program you developed, I'm not sure how yours work, but there are several computer programs out there trying to improve reading speed for people, but I find them generally ineffective as most of them flashes words/phrases/paragraphs on the monitor, and all it does was just irritates the eyes instead of helping, imo.
kooritsuki 1 year ago
@kooritsuki I meant, literally what speed did you have before you started, and what do you achieve now?
Re: the reading program, yes it's as you described it. I actually find it (usually) comfortable to read blocks of 3 words at a time, but I leave it set at 280-300wpm because my comprehension gets bad beyond that. Had to add rewind/forward buttons for when it happens.
batlin 1 year ago
@batlin ic, I started with 150-180wpm, and am at around 350-400wpm now with easy to average material. Right now, I'm pairing speed drills with comprehension drills and am finding it pretty good.
I've use that type of reading programs before, and was able to do around 5 words at a time no problem, except I couldn't do it for more than 2 - 3 mins at a time because it strains the eyes as it's on a computer screen flashing. I find it much better to practice on real paper.
kooritsuki 1 year ago
Photo reading is a scam.
andrewbreen 3 years ago