Uh, no--that's called an additive dissolve. It's an editing effect. It has nothing to do with camera work, and it's not "bad". You might not like it, but it's a legitimate effect.
That's still not bad camera work. The point is to frame her using the painted asphalt in the foreground. That's a well-composed shot using the rule of thirds and keen attention to depth-of-field.
I like this, but @ :16 it's bad camera work 101.
mastashaker916 3 years ago
Uh, no--that's called an additive dissolve. It's an editing effect. It has nothing to do with camera work, and it's not "bad". You might not like it, but it's a legitimate effect.
cinemakid 3 years ago
I'm just talking about the far-away camera, not the transition From a purely novice standpoint.
mastashaker916 3 years ago
That's still not bad camera work. The point is to frame her using the painted asphalt in the foreground. That's a well-composed shot using the rule of thirds and keen attention to depth-of-field.
cinemakid 3 years ago
I see, I do prefer the shot at :02 which seems to be under a similar premise.
Really a camera on a boom would be nice, you know like in the opening to the oscars or something. lol jjust kidding, it would be awesome though.
mastashaker916 3 years ago