Added: 4 years ago
From: boboy2u
Views: 114,789
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (82)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They should of called it Vienna instead of 7.

  • it's 7 because it's the number of luck failer

  • I agree. For some reason, after windows 3, they do not count the non NT kernel releases like windows 98 and ME. At least that is the way it seems.

  • 200 and me have the same kernel ;)

  • Windows 7 is ripoff of Linux KDE and MAC OS is for elitist, pseudo-intellectual's who think it will make them come off as sophisticated when in reality it makes them come off as homosexual. Screw computers, just stick with an abacus.

  • are you kidding!? Linux KDE its nothing like windows 7. and only slightly similar to OSX.

  • linux is better than all windows shit

    suck my dick

  • linux is a joke. The only real linux competition comes from ubuntu. Other than that linux is crap. you got a ton of different distributions with little or no standards. its all a mess. Not only that linux has piratically no driver support for it.

  • To say Linux does not have good drivers is pretty bogus. Load up openSUSE, for instance, on an average PC and everything is recognized and configured at the time of installation. With Windows you will go through a stack of CDs getting everything working right because the drivers are not included with the OS. After that you will go through a stack of application CDs because nothing comes with it. Not even a basic office suite. This is a fact, not an opinion.

  • yes that is true, when it works awesome.But what happens if a piece of hardware doesn't install? in my experience you get screwed cause usually there are no linux drivers for the mass hardware out there. if it doesnt work you have to write the driver your self or compile it for your current kernal. kind sucky if you ask me. Linux still sucks to me not because its crappy but because it lacks standardization and common kernel drivers. check out.Desktop Linux Sucks, And What We Can Do About It.vid

  • You suck! Give us a unix-based OS! :p

  • so this is v7? and v6 was vista? v5 exp, v3 some wother shit

    so where did windows 95 and 98 go? oh and that horrible OS I think it was windows ME? I dont get it

  • How much memory does Vista's kernal take?

  • *sigh* you know I get really tired of you mac dorks going around says, oh mac's better, mac's better, vista sucks, mac's better, you guys use the same damn excuse... it is too slow. well guess what, you base that off company computers, companies give shitty pc's to the employees, and often does not have enough ram or memory to run it. That's the only reason people say it's slow, try it on a home built custom pc with quality parts, it runs like a dream. Mac is the poor man's computer.

  • I agree, I guess I'm a hypocrite? LOL! I use to say oh Vista sucks balls, slow is hell, buggy as fuck! I recently got a pretty sick deal at BestBuy .. I was planning on a custom pc but yeah no time haha .. 4GB RAM, Q6600 Quad Core Proc. .. pretty quick enough for Vista .. I started up Vista first time, it was fast as hell... always updates fixing the bugs which I am happy about..

  • EMM200, your a stupid ignorant fuck. Vista does not get shitty computers, they get all the memory they need in the world, its just not enough to support what is probably the worst operating system ever created in vista. Whereas leopard can run on even the older models without much memory needed.I have a iMac with leopard, and a laptop with Vista..and vista is just a piece of shit. Vista is just a resource hog...and the fact is your just jealous u cant afford a mac.

  • wow... you obviously know absolutely nothing, you see, I have used macs, they're slow as fuck, vista works fine on computers that meet the specs, unfortunately, company pcs, along with your shit ass laptop don't meet those specs, so no shit it will seem like a resource hog, it has a lot of shit running and needs lots of memory along with RAM, along with a decent CPU... stfu until you know what the fuck you're talkign about, I do admit yes, vista has it's issues, but it's not as bad as you say.

  • also, yes, the macs I used did meet the specs for mac osx, surpassed the specs, people try running vista with shit ass pcs, and like hell I'm too poor to get a mac, I have a mac book with guess what, vista... cuz osx fuckin crashed on it... :o what a surprise.

  • This sums it up:

    "Vista looks like it could turn out to be one of the greatest missteps in tech history."

    Peter Burrows BusinessWeek

    Want more proof? How come so many people are downgrading to XP..yes DOWNGRADING! That really says a lot about Vista. What was the last mac you used? the 93' performa? Get in touch with the present. And dont say the company doesnt meet the specs...if at least 1 gb of ram and intel core 2 duo isnt good...i dont know what is. Go get a blue screen or something.

  • Macs are a peice of shit. They make a new 1 every month so your mac is ALWAYS outdated -.- at least windows makes new Operating Systems every 5 years.

  • You're a piece of shit. They dont make a new one every month u idiot, ur just exaggerating. Always outdated? My ipod is outdated...does that mean its garbage? No it still does the job i want it to...it plays music. Go play rs on ur vista u sad fuck.

  • too right

  • The only good thing about Mac is their GUI and their ability to con elitist idiots buying an overpriced system.

  • Theres plenty other good things, and what does an elitist idiot have to do with a purchase of a computer.. Don't bring up the overpriced bs...thats like saying hmmm I'm gonna buy the Hyundai instead of the Ferarri because the Ferarri is overpriced. Macs make their own hardware, whereas Windows just makes software. "A company isn't serious about making software until they make their own hardware."

  • @gaoloole: I don't think Mac is a bad OS, the concept of a stable Linux based kernel with a very good GUI is in fact realy appealing. The only 'problem' I have with Mac is that they make a hype of their product and making annoying ignorant people saying to me that windows blows (which it surely did and still does at certain points). This is for a big deal Apple's fault (or should I say plan) illustrated by their 'I'm a Mac' commercials.

  • Alright, my bad, I misunderstood what you said. It's great to see that you appreciate one of the most strongest features of the Mac. I see what you are saying with Apple's marketing, but that has nothing to do with the OS. Apple hypes their products to get the message out there, because only Mac computers run OS X, and its competitors (Toshiba, Acer, HP, Lenovo, Sony, LG) all carry Windows. Every company should believe they are the best, which is what Apple does.

  • @ gaoloole:

    I would like to add that Microsoft was the first company to concentrate solely on software and became one of the richest companies ever so yes, it's a serious business.

    Is that a quote btw? and if so, by who?

  • I'm not bad mouthing windows, I just dislike their latest work in Vista. In fact, what I like most about windows is their compatibility with pretty much anything, which has been a problem with Macs in the past. By the way, the quote was said by a computer designer of whom I cannot recall the name, but it was mentioned at a recent Mac Keynote presentation. Great convo though...its nice to talk computers from both sides with someone like you who isn't so ignorant. Thanks.

  • Mac OS is certainly not overpriced, it's in fact cheaper, and better, than Vista.

    My 'problem' with Apple is that Apple's home market is hardware. And that hardware when compared to other companies is overpriced. People still buy it for their superior OS (and also because of the hype, but let us ignore that). Especially the desktops are insanely expensive.

  • Distributing their next OS on all PC's would be great; it will make windows innovate and it will advance compatibility on both systems.

    Apple sadly does not want this because it earns a lot on it's hardware, and is the sole competitor in that market. (combination of OS and hardware)

    Personally I use a slimmed down version of XP; it's very fast and compatible and I'm happy Windows has extended the support for XP.

  • microsoft have soem hardware.. it;s just it s not so popular.. and they don t have alot of variety stupid

  • Who is this dumbass? They make some hardware? Like what the Zune? Sure, but it doesnt incorporate their software idiot...

  • How do you pronounce this new window 7?

    " Vienna "

  • Its pronounced as "Windows 7" Vienna was the code name not Windows 7. Microsoft has confirmed that it well ship as Windows 7.

    They said giving it a name like they did with Vista would be a disgrace to a drop dead sexy OS.

    but any ways Vienna is pronounced V-Yen'a

  • yeah, read the description.

    your comment was down right 100% useless.

    it's early in development as you said.

    but it's not that this isn't vienna, it's the milestone 1.

  • .....I dont comment this vid...But of another vienna vids theyre touchable....must cost big money next time while on sale!!! cuz....if vista costs 4,5g CZK...than vienna must costs 10+g

  • how do i get a copy of windows 3.1?

  • torrents! I found MsDos 6.2 and Win 3.1 on piratebay

  • Did they work?

  • Yes! Tried them with Wmvare! I had problems with sound drivers instalation!

    Now I'm using Dosbox for older programs!

  • minwin sucks. 40 megs of memory and it does nothing. i can make an equivalent os that runs on 0 megs :)

  • so go make it and stop den. if u dont like da 40megs of memory den dont use it batty boi no 1 is makein u use it.. so suck yah momma pushole

  • This is all sooooo yesterday...

  • darpanbajaj and jeriqoo, You fucking idiots!

    This IS Windows 7, go google it around, stop posting stupid comments that only reveal how dumb you actually are. The new Kernel is called MinWin which requires just 30MB of Operating Memory to run.

    F**king idiots.

  • hey u basturd

    if u dont have knowledge

    dont show it

  • Name a system that does not have a Core.

  • That is not 7 at all

  • Find me a system without a core, now.

  • its windows vista

  • MinWin, tard.

  • What a dumb video.

    "Hey, look how fast windows 1 launches on my quad core computer! amazing"

    "Hey, windows 7 only uses 40Mb of memory... there is not graphical interface, but a light web server! cool uh"

  • lmfao!!

  • It's the new kernel presentation, you retard.

  • you my friend are a moron! The point is to START out with the "core" of windows, instead of putting shit, ontop of shit. Ofcourse it will have a gui. The conference was to prove a point. The point is, windows 7 WONT be bloated, it will have the basics, and that's what most people want.

  • This isn't even your video.

  • windows vienna?

  • i kno 3five yeye

  • BETTER than Windows 98 "WOW!" blue screen with gates

  • What ? what am i looking at where was this footage of Windows 7 ?

    Tosser, you should label it, some guy mentions windows 7 then shows us every windows but Vienna.

    Thanks for wasting my time.

  • your dumb to think that there is actual footage of windows 7 in production,

    they keep it secret for about 1 year befor release then rush out all these adds nd videos about how cool it will be and how u can get a BETA(very buggy) of it we wont see actualy footage or anything on windows 7 until a long time off unless there is a leak of system files, all this stuff going through utube is bs none of it is real just fake stuff, your best bet is to imagine on what its going to be like OSX leopard :P

  • hope they fix all the bugs and shit from the old vista before its released.

  • U fucking idiot minwin IS windows 7!its core anyway!they dont release the info untill two or three days before relese cuz they unlike u have brains and do not want to get bankrupt!

  • Wow Im looking forward too 2010, Which will be the future of all OS. I just have the feeling!

  • This is just MinWin... Not sure if Windows7 is based on MinWin...? Anyone confirm that...?

  • actualy people dont understand that in the development of windows longhorn (codename) which had bran new technology a new file system and more... they had to make a really big decision either continue with it or respond to the attack of worms that was coming and so they decided to stop and work on xp sp2 do defend xp against worms. then 2 and a half years after they released vista (which had nothing to do w/ longhorn) and now they are going to continue longhorn where they left off

  • vista blows. they need to go back to xp and build from that.

    i stand by that till vista runs as fast & faithfully as xp

  • I think i might just buy the new MacBook Air....NOT

  • Actually the guy is wrong! Windows 2000 was 5.0, Windows XP was 5.5!!

  • ...

    like you know better, smart one

  • I do. Shit man I used all of those OS's for years!

  • actually xp is 5.1 and server 2003 is 5.2

  • 5.5 never existed it is 2000 is 5.0, xp: 5.1, server 2003: 5.2, vista is 6.0 and server 2008 will be 6.1

  • I stand corrected

  • to be correct: 2000 was 5.0, XP: 5.1, Server 2003: 5.2, Vista: 6.0, Server 2008: 6.0 (Same as Vista because it is based on Vista SP1) And Win7 is 6.1.

    I heard that 5.5 was Neptune.

  • want a cookie?

  • this guy is just a stupid presentation-department-member­, is so stupid some times

  • HERE WE HAVE....MS-DOS Server...?

  • Windows 1 had mouse support in it. Retard.

  • Comment removed

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more