Re: yellow top BF -- can easily tell that it is fake simply by how the lower leg straightens out (extends) while walking. The second film-- This guy has a presumably terrifying 30 second encounter and from that distance is able to Focus in on his foreskin?? even through the body fur??? Come on. That phone interview sounds as fake as "Harley Davidson Shirt Guy 9/11 witness"
Another video of Bigfoot where he (it) is doing the same thing as all the Bigfeet in other videos. If you're going to make a fake, at least have some originality.
as much as i wanna believe their is still some mystery in the forests of north america,i cant believe anymore. every piece of evidence in pic or video form now is more likely a hoax and all the people reporting sightings of these animals are just bein hoaxed by a bunch of assholes. im sorry to say but my beliefs in sasquatch are squashed!! maybe they once existed cuz i have to believe in the"patty" footage but they are extinct. they probly died out by the ea.rly eighties.
How do we know the physiology of a penis of a bigfoot???? WE DON'T? Criminy....they obviously have a lot of diffewrences from human! Does their penis even have a sheath?
Did he have a slight hard on at the time?
To totally discount this excellent footage because of this is downright sad.
Consider this... If Bigfoot is real, If.... Seeing horses for instance, If the penis is extended, not even erect, but if it is extended... Then even an uncircumsized penis will have the glans showing.... Just a thought.....
He's Jewish, hello. A jewish sasquatch.... The whole time, well I personally think hoaxers are watching you bigfoot researchers in order to pull these pranks. I would love to believe that there is such a thing as a bigfoot but I'm a visual kinda person. I gotta see it to believe it. I respect the crazy work you do but you have to expect assholes like these hoaxers. Even when it comes to ufology or all cryptozooology study cases, without hard evidence the majority will always doubt you. Goodluck.
Are you seriously expecting people to believe that TWO of you (both yourself and this Jim fellow) both saw a Bigfoot, and you were able to focus in an a penis, on a FURRY animal, long enough to see that sort of detail? Sorry, but I fond that extremely difficult to believe. Not to mention, the organs of a primate would not be exactly the same as those of a human being. Sounds like BS to me. The video is excellent, and looks like the real deal. This "new information"? Not credible.
I would assume that most Sasquatch being large in its body size would have a rather large penis, and in the video they don't say how large it's penis was, just that they saw its genitals. Just because Sasquatch are said to be relatively close to humans doesn't mean that their genitals are exactly like humans. Im not saying that they don't have foreskin, but maybe he just mated with a female Sasquatch and his penis was still rather hard and the tip of his penis was protruding out of the foreskin?
I don't understand how that other guy, Tom or what ever his name was, came to the conclusion that this creature's penis was circumsized? I doubt he got close enough to actually see if it was. If he was close enough to be able to tell that the penis was circumsized, how could he not tell that the penis was sticking out of a large whole cut into the suit that some asshole was wearing. It doesn't make sense. And how big was the penis?
I think most hoax vids have accomplice cameramen, not random encounters. Anyone dumb enough to be randomly tromping around in a sasquatch costume is also dumb enough to deserve getting shot by some redneck who is packing heat in bear country and prepared to bring home real "evidence". And you can bet if that actually happens, that dumb dead guy will be promptly buried in the middle of nowhere to hide the unintentional manslaughter evidence.
Man,whenever I go to the woods,I'd bring my .44,cause IF I actually spot one,I would charge it,than bring it back for ACTUAL evidence,because a video doesn't do much...
trouble accepting it so their questioning what they saw which is a complete natural reaction. To much points to this being legit, esp the genitals. The both of you just saw a male big foot, thats all.
@someguy212 Too much points to it being legit?! You sound like an easy sell. This whole thing was a project, performance art in a sense. The newspaper articles, the photos, all contrived and made in Photoshop to look real. The cell phone calls, contributing "actors" in the project. Nothing was spontaneous, nothing was random. It was all an art project that a lot of people blindly accepted as "legit". It was clearly filled with hints of it being a spoof. Check out the Gable film as a better hoax.
Not realy, i try to keep as open of a mind as possible and not only that i try to listen to what is exhibited in front of me. The way this whole thing sounds, still keeps me on the fence. Not much about this incident, atleast that i can see around here or on the net atleast lends much insight. Sure it "could" be a hoax, but there is always that chance. I have the monsterquest episode on the gable film, pretty cool.
@someguy212 I try to keep an open mind as well, but too many people think an open mind is the same as a wishful mind. It isn't. I might wish bigfoot is real, but that does not make me suspend my rational thinking. I enlarged and slowed down both clips of Yellowtop, and it's clear that both clips are a costume. The newspaper articles are fabricated in Photoshop, totally easy to do. Try to find those articles or even the newspapers mentioned. It's all fake.
@someguy212 Nicely done, perhaps, which is why so many people believed it, and why the perps took it to the next level to "expose" their hoax in such a silly manner. They have a sense of humor, they're laughing about it all.
I called the Musem of Natural History in Lawrence Ks, and currently has a primate expert on staff, and he tells me that great ape foreskin is limited in length and my indeed look circumsized when partial or fully engorged state. You might try to contact another expert and see if you can get a reponse, so far the emails I have sent other than to the professor I eventually was able to speak with did not repond to request to discuss the subject.
@Oreocremerocks that primate expert, is correct in what he told you. You can find that out by simply watching great ape footage that is about the education of male ape behavior. The figure in the second camera phone video, while shotty quality you can tell it is a rather tall individual. Those foot stomps, are making a good deal of noise, which indicates it is very heavy. The creature in the video before, you can tell is also pretty big in build. I think this is legit, and these guys are having
Excuse me buit I have a little buzzzzzz. But it saeems to me that you concentrating way to much on the penis and not SorraBERATING FOOTPRINTS OR HIEGHT
Seriously?,...did you actually see the sasquatch's penis flopping around? Was it gigantically enormous? Did it it have a large girth and large crown? Did you touch it and hold it in your hands or mouth? Did you show the sasquatch your little penis? Did you get a good look at it's scrotum and anal area?
Did you exchange bodily fluids with the sasquatch on this day in question?
I"m sure your probally aware of the Redwood Video Footage that shows this area as well , and in that photo it does not appear to look the same as a circumcised males genitalia either, but I do not think that we can assume exactly what a male bigfoots genitalia would look like, or exspect it to be the same in appearance to a human males. I certainly would not discount or dismiss the authenticity of this footage on the basis of this matter only. That to me would be a little premature judgement.
I appreciate the objectivity and honesty as well, but I still am not totally convinced that we can call it a hoax. First, we don't know what a bigfoot penis is supposed to look like, and second, I don't know if either of you were close enough to really see it was circumcised. It may have appeared to have no "foreskin", but that doesn't equal true circumcision.
I agree. I wouldn't write this off as a hoax yet either. Remember, the enhanced version of the Redwoods footage shows an apparent male sasquatch with what appears to be a circumcised organ. Has anyone even suggested calculating the creature's intermembral index to see whether or not it is within the human range?
maybe sasquatch penises aren't sheathed by a foreskin like humans? Maybe he was aroused like when a dog gets a stiffy.
ShiebMo 2 months ago
Re: yellow top BF -- can easily tell that it is fake simply by how the lower leg straightens out (extends) while walking. The second film-- This guy has a presumably terrifying 30 second encounter and from that distance is able to Focus in on his foreskin?? even through the body fur??? Come on. That phone interview sounds as fake as "Harley Davidson Shirt Guy 9/11 witness"
rntonp 7 months ago
Bigoots got a nice dick :p
BFDxxJOE 8 months ago
Another video of Bigfoot where he (it) is doing the same thing as all the Bigfeet in other videos. If you're going to make a fake, at least have some originality.
illxtra 8 months ago
LOL. Fake? No way. A hoaxed bigfoot? LOL.
cochranexyz 9 months ago
as much as i wanna believe their is still some mystery in the forests of north america,i cant believe anymore. every piece of evidence in pic or video form now is more likely a hoax and all the people reporting sightings of these animals are just bein hoaxed by a bunch of assholes. im sorry to say but my beliefs in sasquatch are squashed!! maybe they once existed cuz i have to believe in the"patty" footage but they are extinct. they probly died out by the ea.rly eighties.
09sexygirlie 11 months ago
How do we know the physiology of a penis of a bigfoot???? WE DON'T? Criminy....they obviously have a lot of diffewrences from human! Does their penis even have a sheath?
Did he have a slight hard on at the time?
To totally discount this excellent footage because of this is downright sad.
mrzizzi1 11 months ago
Cryptozoology novel see video book trailer
dltanner99 11 months ago
Comment removed
drsentell 1 year ago
Not true...the uncircumcized penis when erect or semi-erect emerges from the sheath.
Our Yellow Headed Friend was probably indisposed just prior to being caught on camera.
An Exhibitionist Bigfoot?
drsentell 1 year ago
Consider this... If Bigfoot is real, If.... Seeing horses for instance, If the penis is extended, not even erect, but if it is extended... Then even an uncircumsized penis will have the glans showing.... Just a thought.....
miner830e 1 year ago
He's Jewish, hello. A jewish sasquatch.... The whole time, well I personally think hoaxers are watching you bigfoot researchers in order to pull these pranks. I would love to believe that there is such a thing as a bigfoot but I'm a visual kinda person. I gotta see it to believe it. I respect the crazy work you do but you have to expect assholes like these hoaxers. Even when it comes to ufology or all cryptozooology study cases, without hard evidence the majority will always doubt you. Goodluck.
mjq167 1 year ago
IT DONT MATTER EVERYONE KNOW IT WAS A FAKE FROM THE GET GO BECUSE THE BIGFOOT WAS SKINNY AND TI'S SHOULDER'S WAS LOWER THAN IT'S JAW.
akeemak22 1 year ago
Are you seriously expecting people to believe that TWO of you (both yourself and this Jim fellow) both saw a Bigfoot, and you were able to focus in an a penis, on a FURRY animal, long enough to see that sort of detail? Sorry, but I fond that extremely difficult to believe. Not to mention, the organs of a primate would not be exactly the same as those of a human being. Sounds like BS to me. The video is excellent, and looks like the real deal. This "new information"? Not credible.
LadyGreenEyes964 1 year ago
Just something to think about guys. I know most of us don't want to think about Bigfoot's dick, but damn it. It has to be done!!!!
CBALLZ666 1 year ago
I would assume that most Sasquatch being large in its body size would have a rather large penis, and in the video they don't say how large it's penis was, just that they saw its genitals. Just because Sasquatch are said to be relatively close to humans doesn't mean that their genitals are exactly like humans. Im not saying that they don't have foreskin, but maybe he just mated with a female Sasquatch and his penis was still rather hard and the tip of his penis was protruding out of the foreskin?
CBALLZ666 1 year ago 2
I don't understand how that other guy, Tom or what ever his name was, came to the conclusion that this creature's penis was circumsized? I doubt he got close enough to actually see if it was. If he was close enough to be able to tell that the penis was circumsized, how could he not tell that the penis was sticking out of a large whole cut into the suit that some asshole was wearing. It doesn't make sense. And how big was the penis?
CBALLZ666 1 year ago 3
Basically, someone wants a little peace. "I was fooled, ok?"
.
At these distances on such a hairy beast. Come on!! This statement is more unbelievable than bigfoot itself!!!
No way each of those sightings are a NAKED man haired balled up. In any way!
.
The sighting across the water is another "soldier marching" shot. I never believe those even though it looks huge.
.
The other shoot I would believe if it wasn't for the noise of the cameraman.
Pity.
m1aws 1 year ago 2
So you guys are experts on primate's penises and know for a fact that ALL primates have the same type or style of penis?
I'm seriously not trying to be a smart-ass, I'm just asking.
laughingcrows 1 year ago 2
I think most hoax vids have accomplice cameramen, not random encounters. Anyone dumb enough to be randomly tromping around in a sasquatch costume is also dumb enough to deserve getting shot by some redneck who is packing heat in bear country and prepared to bring home real "evidence". And you can bet if that actually happens, that dumb dead guy will be promptly buried in the middle of nowhere to hide the unintentional manslaughter evidence.
rmcdaniel423 1 year ago
Man,whenever I go to the woods,I'd bring my .44,cause IF I actually spot one,I would charge it,than bring it back for ACTUAL evidence,because a video doesn't do much...
oBLACKandREDo 1 year ago
could you show us yours for comparison...
jopadoch 1 year ago
ok I just went ot the yellow top and is a funny film custom bigfoot .ok nice try .. fraud ..
SLAZHER62 1 year ago
Bonobo penis for reference htt p://ima ges.quickblogcast.c om/2/1/1/8/3/147376-138112/bonobo_chimp_penis_erection_pygmy.jpg
sasquatchcommenter 2 years ago
this guy is too easily convinced by anything, so naive.
RonnieDobbz1978 2 years ago
trouble accepting it so their questioning what they saw which is a complete natural reaction. To much points to this being legit, esp the genitals. The both of you just saw a male big foot, thats all.
someguy212 2 years ago
@someguy212 Too much points to it being legit?! You sound like an easy sell. This whole thing was a project, performance art in a sense. The newspaper articles, the photos, all contrived and made in Photoshop to look real. The cell phone calls, contributing "actors" in the project. Nothing was spontaneous, nothing was random. It was all an art project that a lot of people blindly accepted as "legit". It was clearly filled with hints of it being a spoof. Check out the Gable film as a better hoax.
tontar 1 year ago
@tontar
Not realy, i try to keep as open of a mind as possible and not only that i try to listen to what is exhibited in front of me. The way this whole thing sounds, still keeps me on the fence. Not much about this incident, atleast that i can see around here or on the net atleast lends much insight. Sure it "could" be a hoax, but there is always that chance. I have the monsterquest episode on the gable film, pretty cool.
someguy212 1 year ago
@someguy212 I try to keep an open mind as well, but too many people think an open mind is the same as a wishful mind. It isn't. I might wish bigfoot is real, but that does not make me suspend my rational thinking. I enlarged and slowed down both clips of Yellowtop, and it's clear that both clips are a costume. The newspaper articles are fabricated in Photoshop, totally easy to do. Try to find those articles or even the newspapers mentioned. It's all fake.
tontar 1 year ago
@someguy212 Nicely done, perhaps, which is why so many people believed it, and why the perps took it to the next level to "expose" their hoax in such a silly manner. They have a sense of humor, they're laughing about it all.
tontar 1 year ago
@tontar a jewishbigfoot??????whowould figure????
thoostorm4 1 year ago
@tontar a jooish bigfoot
thoostorm4 1 year ago
I called the Musem of Natural History in Lawrence Ks, and currently has a primate expert on staff, and he tells me that great ape foreskin is limited in length and my indeed look circumsized when partial or fully engorged state. You might try to contact another expert and see if you can get a reponse, so far the emails I have sent other than to the professor I eventually was able to speak with did not repond to request to discuss the subject.
Oreocremerocks 2 years ago
@Oreocremerocks that primate expert, is correct in what he told you. You can find that out by simply watching great ape footage that is about the education of male ape behavior. The figure in the second camera phone video, while shotty quality you can tell it is a rather tall individual. Those foot stomps, are making a good deal of noise, which indicates it is very heavy. The creature in the video before, you can tell is also pretty big in build. I think this is legit, and these guys are having
someguy212 2 years ago
Comment removed
someguy212 2 years ago
Anyone with a SEMI looks circumcised, you must have turned him on.
phiddlist 2 years ago
So you guys saw a guy in a costume, with his dick out and you couldn't tell? You are fooling yourself. You DID see bigfoot.
Chadfish 2 years ago
What is this fucking bull shit?
A dogs penis doesn't look like a human penis.
What does an ape's penis look like, anyone?
How about a chimp's or a monkey's? I am not convinced that it is a hoax. Who the fuck was out there and KNEW that you were gonna film them? Bogus.
You even said that there had been reports of bigfoot all over that area.
MrDuffy81 2 years ago
LMAO...this is some of the funniest shit I've ever seen/heard. WTF.
jkstock04 2 years ago
My wife will anilize the redwood foootage because she know a giant cercumsized penis when she see's it.
stainlesslobster 2 years ago
that was hilarious. I died laughing.
andrellen 2 years ago
But,seems.,Coraberating. Sorry .... ok a lot buzzed
stainlesslobster 2 years ago
Excuse me buit I have a little buzzzzzz. But it saeems to me that you concentrating way to much on the penis and not SorraBERATING FOOTPRINTS OR HIEGHT
stainlesslobster 2 years ago
Seriously?,...did you actually see the sasquatch's penis flopping around? Was it gigantically enormous? Did it it have a large girth and large crown? Did you touch it and hold it in your hands or mouth? Did you show the sasquatch your little penis? Did you get a good look at it's scrotum and anal area?
Did you exchange bodily fluids with the sasquatch on this day in question?
WE WANT THE DAMN TRUTH!!!
acerman66 2 years ago
It's official, I'm never watching another Bigfoot video.
acedudeone 2 years ago
The reason for this is because BF is a muslim.
But no really, why would a guy in a suit let his stuff hang out.
VCthaGOATdunker 2 years ago
I"m sure your probally aware of the Redwood Video Footage that shows this area as well , and in that photo it does not appear to look the same as a circumcised males genitalia either, but I do not think that we can assume exactly what a male bigfoots genitalia would look like, or exspect it to be the same in appearance to a human males. I certainly would not discount or dismiss the authenticity of this footage on the basis of this matter only. That to me would be a little premature judgement.
mykidsdad36 2 years ago
If you stop the video just before the end, you will see a breast clearly.
needininfo 2 years ago
I appreciate the objectivity and honesty as well, but I still am not totally convinced that we can call it a hoax. First, we don't know what a bigfoot penis is supposed to look like, and second, I don't know if either of you were close enough to really see it was circumcised. It may have appeared to have no "foreskin", but that doesn't equal true circumcision.
Hako2004 2 years ago
Comment removed
nealcole 2 years ago
I agree. I wouldn't write this off as a hoax yet either. Remember, the enhanced version of the Redwoods footage shows an apparent male sasquatch with what appears to be a circumcised organ. Has anyone even suggested calculating the creature's intermembral index to see whether or not it is within the human range?
nealcole 2 years ago
a) it's been an obvious fake since day one
b) you were in on it the entire way
c) we all know you're lying
cannontony 2 years ago
dont be so quick to judge, but i do understand where ur coming from
GermanAmerican22 2 years ago
Wow...Thanks for the honesty..very refreshing..Good Luck
cprahl007 2 years ago