Economist Peter Schiff On Ron Paul - YouTube.flv

[schwarzblatt]

Intelligent design crackpot, torture apologist, interventionist hawk...looks like Dick Cheney decided to troll Youtube RP videos. Go suck on a Patriot missile.

[KAAAching1]

@samwst56 What a load of shit

[samwst56]

Ron Paul had several incidents he would not like the press to know about. Beware of the Wolf Blitzer.

[samwst56]

Ron Paul would rather forget the "incident" in Iowa in the hotel. But several eye-witnesses won't forget. 

[jneil2007]

Cavuto and Beck are douche bags. "There is an optomistic team." Well what do you want Paul and Schiff to say, "don't worry we can print money endlessly. We are America, economic law doesn't exist here."

[samwst56]

I want a date with the gorgeous red head.

[jneil2007]

@samwst56 Red heads without all them freckles is hot!!! Some freckles are cool but not the ginger look lol.

[dontwatchpornatwork]

this guy has a boner for Ron Paul. So do I, Peter... so do I.

[wolfgange63]

watch?v=lu_VqX6J93k

[khanmar]

@wolfgange63

hey thanks that was actually a really good watch

[CAridge2008]

This was in 2008, before Paul's Left-Wing foreign policy views were well known. Go to AntiWar.com and see Paul's stupid views. He sounds like a leftist peacenik; looney, naive, America-hating/blaming, blathering about the military-industrial complex. It could be Hillary Clinton talking. He thinks that the US just leaves Korea and the North&South will be friends! His immigration policy is incomprehensible! Paul's nutty views are now starting to come out! PAUL = NOT PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL!

[khanmar]

@CAridge2008

again you are way out of context and you dont delve into the reasons why he is mad at the American federal government. Apparently you need to look at more than once source for information.

[nybboy]

Korea's division is along a line that bears no historical relevance in Korea's 3000 year history. The division was caused by the U.S. and the Soviets when they temporarily occupied a reunited Korea after WW2. The North, though is a Kingdom, and there is a lot of power in a few hands so they don't want to lose power and their only playing card is the military. In a peaceful reconciliation, the South's government would seems more legitemate. But, as a whole, both sides want reunification.

[khanmar]

@nybboy Well spoken!

[RightWingTV]

@CAridge2008 - Thank GOD people like you are few and far between today as more of sheeple get unplugged, re-awakened, and informed. Ron Paul 2012. Win or lose, his message of liberty, peace, and prosperity will live on because we will go bankrupt if we don't severely downsize the federal government, and when we as Americans are left holding worthless fiat paper dollar notes, we will beg for answers then. Good luck my fellow citizen and may God grant you wisdom. Learn to speak Chinese.

[CAridge2008]

@RightWingTV - Look, RP may be right on some things like the fed govt. but he is a pacifist America-basher. You dopes that have bought into him don't understand that he is fatally flawed. You are right to downsize the Fed Govt BUT don't take it out of the military's hide! The military only takes 3.5% of the country's GDP and much more is spent on entitlements and the welfare state! On all foreign policy RP is a paranoid crank. But the koolaid drinkers don't want to see that.

[Combat79]

@CAridge2008 baaahhhhh baaaaahhhhh (thats the sound sheep make, im sure you can translate it for me)

[VolkOseba]

@CAridge2008 Someone who talks about the military industrial complex is looney, huh? I don't see you saying that about the guy who originally warned about it, President Eisenhower. It's funny, Conservatives don't like government subsidized industries... except if they make weapons.

[samwst56]

@VolkOseba Beware of the military industrial complex.

[samwst56]

@VolkOseba War is good business. It keeps the wheels of industry going. No money in peace. 

[VolkOseba]

@samwst56 It does not "keep the wheels of industry going." On the contrary, it diverts capital and labor away from those professions which the market actually finds useful...

[samwst56]

@VolkOseba Peace on you.

[khanmar]

@samwst56

i disagree. Economics proves that money not spent in one industry is simply spent in another. Perhaps building, manufacturing or technology. You will never know because the unseen effect's victims never knew their attacker. How can an industry that didnt thrive and went under know who to blame for trillions of dollars beings spent elsewhere. Also that 4-5 trillion is money we 'made' from thin air so its not a good business to be in.

[CAridge2008]

@VolkOseba Look, just because Eisenhower made a worried comment about the MICX in the 50s doesn't mean that in the years since his worries came true; he was ultimately proved wrong. Those that preach about the MICX are 99% left-wingers. US industry has done more to protect American soldiers than all the left-wing kooks that ever lived, with the BEST technology for the best military in the world! So RP looks to me like one of those left-wing kooks when he blathers against the MICX!

[khanmar]

@CAridge2008

Proved ultimately wrong?! Please do tell. Also I would LOVE for you to prove that crony capitalism made my soldier friends good body armor. 5 million pieces, a few which I've seen the plates get CRUSHED with minimal effort...then there is the APCS and LACK of equipment....this is a sore topic for me, and you are treading on dangerous waters with this lie. 2004-2006 80% causality rate when hit in the chest.....fucking bastards only got fired or minimal jail time!

[CAridge2008]

@khanmar Look, US companies provide our soldiers with thousands of pieces of equipment and they are the best equipped in the world - I don't have to prove that. IF some company makes bad equipment THEN that company will be dropped off the US supplier's list. If there's corruption and a bad company turns up then EACH CASE has to be looked at individually. Don't let your raging anger get in the way and don't be like kooky Ron Paul wanting to throw out the baby with the bathwater!

[CAridge2008]

@VolkOseba And another thing: the defense industry is not a "government subsidized industry!" The US has a military (because RP supporters, it's a dangerous world out there!) and the military needs equipment. So who are they going to buy high-tech equipment from? The bureaucrats at the H.U.D? If the military doesn't need it, they won't buy it, so where is the subsidization? "Subsidizing" means you support something without needing its products, but JUST to keep it propped up.

[VolkOseba]

@CAridge2008 To "subsidize" means "to support financially."

[schwarzblatt]

@CAridge2008 let's close down our military bases and bring our troops home, then we can talk about whether we should be shoveling money into Raytheon and Boeing's bloated coffers.

[CAridge2008]

@schwarzblatt Yes, you Ron Paul robots want to close down ALL bases around the world whether they're needed or not! And then stop ALL money into the "EVIL" corporations that are keeping American troops safe with the best technology in the world. Then, when the "EVIL" corporations and the US military can't defend America any more, what will you do? You sound like a bunch of left-wing utopian loonies! That's why the voters are rejecting RP and his kooky deranged libertarian views.

[khanmar]

@CAridge2008

You are as moronic as bush looking through a pair of binoculars with the lens cap on. All over seas bases do need to come to a close. Fiscally it cannot be maintained with the level of debt this country has taken on. corps are not evil provided they are not subsidized or lobbied for. We have enough arms, we dont need any more. We need to open bases back here at home rather then close bases here and open them over seas thats retarded, illogical and unsound!

[CAridge2008]

@khanmar Look, how about this bit of reasoning: close some overseas bases but only the least important ones. Most are there at the host country's request. Why use RP's scortched-earth reasoning to close them all? Why balance the entire US budget on the back of the military? It's only 20% of the budget! If the US government's welfare state (80% of the budget) was scrutinized & de-funded like the miltary, we would have no Federal debt! But only a reasonable mind will get this.

[rogerfgay]

@CAridge2008 and eating babies, don't forget to mention eating babies - that's really cool

[samwst56]

@CAridge2008 Very, very truthfully told. The Runts followers don't like to hear the truth.

[khanmar]

@samwst56

If you consider that the truth , you seriously need to fact check, are either of you even in the military?

[HelzzFinestx]

@CAridge2008 America hating? He is a constitutionanist. That's as PRO American as it gets. You are a complete idiot. Ron Paul signs usually say ONE thing, "Google Ron Paul." Why? Because the facts don't lie. Do your research before you take shots at our only hope.

[CAridge2008]

@HelzzFinestx And you support de-balling the US military with fake calls to the constitution! Where in the constitution does it say to disarm the US military? Where in the constitution does it say to never have any bases overseas in order to protect America? Where does it say to put blinders on about nuclear threats against the US and are allies? Where does it say that we can't kill a terrorist who killed 3000 American citizens? Where does it say to keep our borders wide open?

[HelzzFinestx]

@CAridge2008 Where in the constitution does it say to do ANYTHING the government is doing today. Obviously the constitution isnt going to have specific points of interest where we should have bases because that is clearly something that happens through events or acts of terrorism. But the point is we do not need to be in hundreds of countries around the world when we on our own are not doing okay. 3000 American citizens And here is what happened 4770 American servicemen KIA in Iraq

[PrivateAckbar]

@CAridge2008 You have no idea what you're talking about.

[Tyler7692]

@CAridge2008

Whatever the issue is, if you're so concerned about the rest of the world how about you devote your entire unemployment check to saving South Korea, or Israel, or the other 138 countries we maintain bases in. I'm sick and tired of paying for it, and I'm sick and tired of pissing other nations off to the point that they WANT / NEED to attack us to get the message across. RON PAUL 2012

[ImhoffInstruments]

I like Peter Schiff even more now :) I'd like to see Paul/Schiff in 2012

[khanmar]

@ImhoffInstruments

that would be cool, but i see Schiff as more of a capitalist. I want Paul to pick either judge napolitano or maybe a tv libertarian icon like John stossel.

[ImhoffInstruments]

@khanmar Yeah my first choice out of television personalities would probably be Napolitano, I'd like to see Stossel too but I'm not sure it would happen. Whoever it is, I'm sure they'll have similar views to Ron though thankfully. :)

[wolfgange63]

@khanmar There is nothing wrong with capitalism. There is nothing wrong with working for trade. However Paul is against federalist not capitalist.

[superhawkn]

Peter Schiff and Ron Paul staightening Glenn Beck out for first time Beck is making some sense of late.

[david4141faith]

wow peter knows his sh...