"African American culture developed seperately from mainstream American culture"
I noticed you featured Jimmy Hendrix there. Well he was part of the psychadelic cultural movement which, despite him, was predominantely white. So you couldn't quite say he was seperate from white "mainstream" culture .
Haha One day Humanity will wake up and see videos like this is foolish. The point their were slaves is nothing African Americans should be ashamed of its something Humanity as a whole SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF. Showing this video to expose what ? How petty and cave man life humanity use to be ? Humanity history as a whole has been rewritten so much that who is to say they are wrong ? I love humanity but I go with Native Americans on this one never trust data that has European anywhere near it. haha
What I want to know is were there ever an "North African civilization" in Subsahara Africa? I have heard the claims of how North Africans brought the practice of Agriculture to central Africa....hmmm...but damn, I thought iron was first discover in subsahara Africa's southeast Nigeria northwest-Cameroon region....interesting
TALKING LOUD, SAYING NUTHIN' IS A OLD POPULAR SAYING AMONG US OLDER BANTU/SUDANIC/NIGER/MIXED CHILDERN OF SLAVE NIGGAS. THAT'S WHAT YOUR VIDEO OF THEORIES AND HALF TRUTHS MIXED WITH SHARP EDITING AND SUB-SAHARAN RYTHMS IS. EXCUSE MY WEST AFRICAN- INFLUENCED ENGLISH AND SPELLING. SOUNDS LIKE ONE OF DEM AFRO-CENTRIST TOOK YOUR SWEET THANG OR LAID SOME BANTU KNUCKLES ON U.
They came from KINGS, QUEENS, SOLDIER, PEASANTS, and COMMON PEOPLE in AFRICA!!!! ;) We had KINGDOMS, EMPIRES, AND DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLICS!!!! ;) WHAT'S TO BE ASHAMED OF??!!!! _V_ (Peace)
@chukwuemeka23456 Poor low IQ nigger... they were remissive slaves that came from their stinky mud huts lol. Egyptians were obviously white mediterraneans the craniofacial structure of their ancient skulls is typical of mediterranean europoids. Not negroids lol. Tutankhamon was R1b. Negroids don't have create simply NOTHING. Sub-saharan Africa, historically, is a total BLACK HOLE. Cause negroids are just inferior your average IQ is 67 lol see the chart:
@jubilee203 85 percent of this video is bullshit. Not too much of a surprise coming from the guy who believes that the Kingdom of Mali was founded and ruled by Caucasoids. Smfh
I am black and I do agree with most of what this video has mentioned. I don't know why someone should be ashamed that they're from sub-sahara Africa. Slavery is not a curse, it's a criminal act with no justice. Nothing to be ashamed of. Raping, kidnapping, and slaving are just barbaric act. People that rapes and kill other people are just people with better weapon. Having better weapon does not make one superior. Black people in America are just bantus, accept it.
Lol ! Morocco is located in Extrem Northren North west africa - North of North african Sahara
a greenland with the Great Mountains called atlas mountains similar to alpine mountains of europe Morocco is so known by his Mediteranean climate similar to southern european environements like spain Italy Greece ....
Damm this guy is racist! what a wasteman! he has hate running trough his backward vain's, I Suggest that intelligent people looking for intelligent debate refrain from wasting their time on this buffoon! we all know no one credible in academia adhere's to this racist gobbledigook, this guy is just looking for a negative argument so that he feed off it! he is a SET FORCE energy seeker, another "Jerusalem Muslim Father of the kabala just another weak ass scholar" ignore his Neanderthal Ass!!!
there is no limit for being a african american you dumbass, if you have a african nationality (north african, south african etc) and you emigrated to america you are an afro (african american)
India is in Asia ... and ASIA is a continent ... so are Indians the same as Japanese or ... are chinese the same as Russians for Example ? if to you african = afro-american then let me know ... does North african equals sub-saharan?
@samysamy25 Im not saying that if your african your a african-american, i am saying that if you are from african descend and you was born in america/ emigrated to america you are a afro american
@samysamy25 how do you expalin the negroid peoples of paupa new guinea or the other micronesian lisands like Vanuatu and the soloman islands? How did they get there? please anwser me that. please sammy please answer me. how did the people of paupa new guinea and the miscronesian islands get there? Look into Austro-Melanesian History. The european caveman was 30,000 years ago. The people of the south pacific were already there 50,000 years ago. this video is misleading
they weren't from 50Kya ...but about 20.000BC and they are BIOLOGICALLY asiatic People NOT closer or related to africans sub-saharans ....they does not look like negroids at this time but of ARCHAIC FEATURES similar to that of Homo.Heidlbergensies .... they look negroids because of tropical environements and chimical effects of this equatorial areas ....its the same case for negroids sub-saharans africans ...they Never look like their real ancestors
Great video, those afrocentrists get on my nerves. They also try to make fake claims about my people. I think they claim other race's civilizations because they are jealous.
I am not clear what the point of your video is really. We all descend from an ancient Egyptian man who was E1b1 anyway so we are all brothers no matter what we look like. This is our massive and super-successful clan!
Lol !! of course Not ...we are not brothers to you or to bantuids ...the Lineage PN2 is originated in North Africa before 30.000BC his ancestor E1b1 DOES NOT LOOK LIKE BANTU ....your real brothers are the pygmies and khoisans since you are closer to them MATERNALLY both by L1c, L0a , L2a1a1 and L2a2 - L2a1b , L2c , L2d mtDNA 's this your massive-successful clan and RACIAL REALITY
BS: bantuids are the result of an ancient admixture between Proto-caucasians and archaic humans
@samysamy25 your reply is also confusing. "we are not brothers to you or to bantuids" do you know what I look like? Who are you to say we aren't allowed to take whoever we want for wives? Your mother is a descendant of L2, L1 and L0. Do you hate your mother? Prodigal Hitler is the most ugly in our fraternity. He also hated his mother. Don't walk in his prodigal footsteps.
Nop ! L-mtDNA sequences weren't the same and the most of our females are from L3 the most divergent Eurasian female .. bantuids had their specific females Like L1c1 and L1a1 In common with Pygmies .those females are NOT Humans but more closet to chimps and Monkeys wich is explains why sub-saharans had an Erectus features its because of admixture and DEVOLUTION
Hitler had nothing with you or to your lumped theories . PN2 is from 30KYA an expulsed men from North africa case Closed
seriously all these are projected to make sure sub saharans have nothing to do with north african and egypt civilization but you forget the whole sub sahara had thier own civilization that out match the greek eg ghana empire and the yorubas.africa is africa and europe is europe leave it like that.what ever comes out of africa leave it to africans and what ever comes out of europe should be for europeans stop trying to divide us.we have intermarried and traded for thousands of years.
ghana ; sounghai and mali empires are made and controled /Invaded by white people like Moroccans and touaregs plus spaniards ; there is nothing Negroid as civilisation in west sub-saharan africa
these civilization is typically from sahel and saharan area not the sub-saharan west africa !
africa is our continent before ur presence in her since she is our word wich means in our language THE COLD CAVE . Greecks are connected to us NOT u BANTUS and we are WHITE NATIVES OF AFRICA
@samysamy25 ok now i cannot continue this arguments cause your no longer making sense , the igbos have been in sub sahara africa for over 5000bc they had a republican system of government even before the greeks, i dont know the war you have with afrocentrics but dont try distort peoples history, they even had pyramids built with muds had writting similar to that of ancient egypt ,they had there own days and years and money arts and there no diff btwenn ancisnt igbo trad and modern one.
HAHAHA wrong again the first appearance of bantus tribes is after 1500BC to 1000AD during their expansion in Equatorial africa ; Igbo had admixed caucaziod blood in them from the Huasa tribes who are originally Asiatics eurasian before 12.000BC . Igbos don't have any system except their life with monkeys and Gorillas ; of course yes , bantuids had no relation with pyramids or anyhting since the first bantu wrinting is appeared at 1945 . stop lying ..pathetic and so stupid ur lies
@samysamy25 honsetly if bantus migrated does not mean there were no indiginous tribes in the subsahara , even the hausa and fulani are in sub sahara but they are of afroa-asiatic, besides not all north africans consider them selves whites anyway its not my buisness you should know better about your people but like the europeans and american whites dont rob others of a legacy they are part of it does no one any good.
bantus are not natives of west sub-saharan africa ; cause they are a recent phenomena of admixed Proto-caucaziod and archaic african human species plus their admixed with gymies and khoisans
those afro-asiatics people of saharan and sahel area are from north africa ; anthroplogically and genetically its prove it . Go to my video why ethiopian have caucasian features !
Lol .biologically we are 100% african but we are white in fact other africans are less 10% africans like camerronians
Really? So west african civilizations have nothing to do with west africa? Is that why the cultures of Mali, Songhai, and Benin had nothing to do with that of whites? Tuaregs made timbuktu but indigenous africans turned it into a learning centre. Sankore university's most renowned scholars were WA. Morrocans invaded Mali and ruled it for like a decade before the assholes left and let the country fall to other tribes. No credible historian agrees with that shit, you retard motherfucker
You truely fail at all things relating to history. Mali being a white culture isn't even heard of, jesus being African has more credibility than the shit you've just said. No historian in his right mind would ever say Mali was white, dude, not even the most racist of all Eurocentric scholars would make that argument. Look at the background image of my channel and tell me that Benins Bronze Art was made by a white culture. West African empires were ruled by a Bantu speaking ppl, idiot. Bantuids
Ok, so this is mostly about Bantu migrations. I don't get your point. What/Who is saying amongst the AA community that they are not partially of these people (People of west Africa are not Bantu)? Certainly not me. Who is ashamed of slavery, certainly not me. WE ARE STILL HERE!!! This is a source of pride and strength, FYI. What is your source again for "Negroids" being relatively new, on earth? New compared to who?
Rh Negative is short for Rhesus Factor Negative. Virtually 90% of Europe is Rh Positive..which means their genes include a specific chain of dna from a Rhesus Monkey.
The highest level of Rh- in any region of the world is in the Karaites people of Iraq with 53 per cent of the Rh-negative Cde complex. 50% of the Basque population is Rh-negative. The next highest levels are in Wales and Scotland. The Karaites are actually a Jewish sect that rarely inter marry outside their own blood lines
Negroid is an outdated racialist term. It is completely rejected by credible anthropologists. It is a racist term and how appropriate that it is used in this racist video.
Nice video but a few things are flawed. AAs are not 'ashamed' of their history as slaves. It's actually viewed as a bout of honor to be a survivor those who've committed suicide. I think you should spend some time getting to know AA culture. Now concerning the Bantu expansion, I've seen very few geneticists, anthropologists, archaeologists agree on where this expansion began. BUT we must note something: Bantus are South Africans not West Africans...at least linguistically anyway.
This video is good for you,and I hope you enjoyed your histories,and be proud of what belongs to you, instead of claiming something that never belong to you.
African American = Bantu descendant or type2 Bantoid
Like your Fulani mommy? Lol awwww the irony....it's amazing how someone who is not you can come in and not only divide you according to how they see fit..but tell you what you are at the same time....now little maid girl leave me alone...I have no idea how this month old mashpah ended up in my comments box....ADIOS!
Afro Americans are Pan African in their heritage. Slaves were taken from all over the continent and brought to the coast in West and Central Africa, Although most of the Slaves were of West African descent. Many West Africans now residing in their areas originally descend from Central Saharan / North Central African Negroid populations. Like the Mande and Wolof in your list for example.
@samysamy25 Not according to this woman from her Mtdna.
youtube . com / watch ? v = hZzQU3 dT9DA
Mtdna >
buubi, tikar, hausa, fula
Hausa (Afro Asiatic) originate in North Africa Sudan (Nubia)
Fula (Nilo Saharan) originate in North African (Central Sahara)
Tikar (Niger Congo) originate in Central Africa.
From her Mtdna she is Pan African culturally and linguistically etc. And this is only her Mtdna!!, she hasn't even genetically tested where her Y chromosome comes from!!!
@Focusingmuch it seems that you do not know what Pan Africanism is. Do you see African Americans trying to unite themselves, Africans and others of African heritage? I have never seen such. The only time such a movement was birthed was during the Civil Rights Era. So learn more African American history and put aside the theories...which is mostly what ppl say about us. Another thought concerning African Americans, our cultures vary from region to region so Samy really strewed up this time.
i don't know about , Greek and Phoenician, but we do have Jewish and Moorish roots!!! look at jimili's channel(for example) He's and African-American with Tuareg (Moorish) roots. Plus, people from his Tuareg, Kanuri and Fulani tribes have Jewish roots as well!!! There is the Lemba tribe in South Africa with Jewish roots, and there are Igbo tribes( one of the areas with slave trade) with potential Jewish roots, AND CUSTOMS SIMILAR TO THE JEWISH CULTURE!!!
@chukwuemeka23456 An AA who claims to be a Phoenician or a Greek?! This ish is funny..I never heard of this in my life. Now there are so afrocentrics who claim Moorish ancestry due to European labeling of certain Islamic slave groups. These afrocentrics are the Moorish Science Temple and their lovechild group: NOI. Now for those of us who have genetic proof...yeah, I'm dying to see someone disprove it. By the way, I'm 100% anti-Afrocentric....just the facts.
Plus, NOT ALL OF THE "SUB-SAHARAN" Africans are BANTU'S. If you knew ANYTHING, you would know that FIRST OF ALL, there are some africans that not even BANTIOD (let ALONE Bantu). Some one from West Africa DOESN'T LOOK LIKE someone from EAST AFRICA!!! Someone from East African DOESN'T LOOK LIKE SOMEONE FROM CENTRAL OR SOUTHERN AFRICA!!! Secondly, WE ALL HAVE UNIQUE CULTURES, AND next TO ARABS, WE ARE ONE OF THE MOST DIVERSITY PEOPLE ON THE EARTH!!! PLUS, THEY'RE ARE DARKSKINNED PEOPLE...
Good video but it goes downhill with the nonsense about "Afrocentrics" and what not. You should take that mess out or at least give some examples of the people you are talking about and exactly WHY whatever they claim is incorrect.
like urs of course , I am looking to Debuncking the East african origin of Humanity
and of course proved that Negroids are simply a recent case of OUR DEVOLUTION
In comparaison with Non-African Negroids ..not just by the chemical effects of Environements or the biological and archaic Mixtures but also with craniofacial anthropometry
Just Imagine a video tittled : first people of africa are NOT BLACK
so ! go to ur community and tell to them : don't play with the fire ...
@samysamy25 Well what you need to find then Is DNA evidence that does NOT tie the origin of Humaity to sub Saharan East Africa. Good luck trying to make yourself famous. DNA will pretty much trump whatever you find.
Lol ...DNA most of these Phylogenetics traces are simply theories Not Based by the Modern Anthroplogy ....anyhow , first Homo-sapiens were Not Negroids at all ....they are fully Europoids by racial Looking I can prove it so easly ...and as u know human divergence is happened before 140Kya
@samysamy25 I'd also like to see proof of that as it seems to contradict all the mainstream archeological and genetic evidence that indicates human origins in tropical Africa.
@samysamy25 hah wtf are you talking about you on crack son!... if europeans were the first homosapeins why do they have the highest amount of neanderthal blood up to 50% in some studies paablo parnters has been quoted saying so? its just common sense lol! you racist pig!
EUROPOIDS does not mean Europeans ; and europeans are not the first people of earth but they have some blood and direct relationship on them from these people
Neanderthals are our brothers baby ...we share with them the same ancestor
really ..50% ?! the most hybrid people with neanderthals were north africans and Not europeans as far the max percentage is around 12%
because there is Neanderthals in North Africa since the late Pleistocene
come on u talk with Moroccan !! we know our history and no one has any argument towards us ...we are so honest about that ; to us black represents an Insult
if u came here in Morocco u would be so surprised because our nation are so racist towards sub-saharans u can find on google ;Moroccan racism towards black or Blacks experience racism in Morocco
for wikipedia its me who edit the Ghana Article just for ur Info
You forgot the facts that the ancestors of present-day African Americans, Afro-Latinos, and Afro-Caribbeans created kingdoms/civilizations like Mali, Ghana, Songhai, and Kongo. I'm not an Afrocentric and I don't get that many Afro-descent people just can't be proud of out ancestors instead of making up stupid stories of being Hebrews, Native Americans, Egyptians, Moors or trying to link us to Asian empires (South Asia, East Asia, Southeast Asia).
kingdoms/civilizations like Mali, Ghana, Songhai ...are Gouverned and created by white people of North african descents like Touaregs or Moroccans but also some Iberians these civilizations are mainly peopled by Fulanis Hausa ,Dogons and some sahel and saharan peoples Not by The bantus of Congo and Nigeria
and those people of sahel and sahara are genetically closer and related to North africans and Europeans than sub-saharans
I will make a video about that with sources of course ...sorry but I can't give u any link for this ; I wanna to surprise the afrocentrics crushing them so HARD as they can't ever imaginate what I have
@MysticNinjaJay"Mali, Ghana and Songhai were not governed or created by White people"
Exactly my point on the term Negroid. If we choose to accept the system of racial taxonomy that physical anthropologists have traditionally established—major races: black, white(a term you just used) etc.—then one can classify human skeletons within it just as well as one can living humans. You cannot discredit the evidence of skeletal biology.
Mali, Ghana and Songhai were not governed or created by White people
yeah because of North african muslim Influence on west africa u can't deny this fact !! but also those empires are conquered and controled by touaregs or Moroccans and some cities are declared as North african territories and build by spaniards or Moroccans and touaregs !
Nop ! wrong again ....adaptation is due to radiation and Hot climatic effects
most of caucaziod who are so diverse are admixed with other Unknown species semilar to Homo-Redhonesian or homo-florensis specially those of south of sahara ;bantuid face is not due to climate but with an hybrid admixture of proto-caucaziods with archaic homonoids ....
@samysamy25 Homo-Redhonesian? Never heard of it. If you're not going to give me your sources on these racial theories then I will wait for your video. Until I see credible evidence to the contrary I'm sticking to mainstream concepts in evolutionary biology on the diversity of human traits.
@samysamy25 Alot of Afrocentrics are adopting the term "Black African" and calling terms like Caucasoid,Negroid irrelevant in order to place themselves in Egypt.Of course when using the term Black African they refer specifically to Negroids.
as u know egypt has nothing with afro-americans ... yeah she is an african civilization but this does not = black !! africa is a continent not race or color
@solarempire88 Most African-Americans who identify with Ancient Egypt and know a bit about the history of African cultures know that they are not directly descended from Ancient Egyptians but see Egypt as a Black civilization. The Ancient Egyptians were a native African people who would have looked like your average tropical East African.
so according to u there is such thing like : black civilization ?
explain to me how they aren't not directly linked to ancient egyptians ?
u know that east africans are genetically NOT CLOSER or related to west african groups at all ...tropics ? and In east africa ...they are Pastoralists originally from saharan area ...BTW ancient egyptians had nothing with east africans
@samysamy25 Denying Black civilizations is a bit like Holocaust Denial. No credible mainstream modern scholar takes it seriously. Shomarka Keita who you mention in the video tags proved empirically that the Ancient Egyptians were biologically linked to more Southerly Africans such as Nubians, Somali and Oromo. Their language and culture were introduced to the Nile Valley from East Africa. There's also some Saharan influence but Northwest Africa was not always populated by lighter skinned people.
Nop ! its not a denial cause u believe in color civilizations ! ! !
Shomarka Keita ....ask @Salassin if u wanna what he said because what u claimed about him is totally a bunch of lies ...to me Keita is so Biased ! biologically ?! ..really ...so find this Video /watch?v=sOhEtxi6Skc
saharan influence in Northwest africa is due to slavery like other parts of North africa and thats has nothing with native North africans ..afro-asian languages are introduced by Europoid Populations
@samysamy25 If you go to Salsassin's videos you will find comments I made about emailing Keita myself to ask him more direct questions about what the Ancient Egyptians looked like and he confirmed what I am saying about his work. I have screenshots for proof. How is Keita biased. He's a respected Biological Anthropologist. Afroasiatic was introduced to North Africa and the Middle East from East Africa. Look up the work of Christopher Ehret.
of course Not I can't respect such PROPAGANDIST like this one ; and who can foreget his claims of Badarian with Tropic teeth ?! he is so Biased ....Now he can't Understand why North africans had the most oldest caucasian females in the world ....his PAN-BLAKCNESS of course do u think really that I can respect him ...oh ! No ..Plz ! ever Now ...he said amazighs are related to chadic and ancient egyptians just this but he can't said they are Amazighs ! so Hard for him
@samysamy25 Tropical teeth? What article did he say this in? Keita doesn't prescribe to Pan-Blackness. Again he is a respected Biological Anthropologist he has been consulted by mainstream academic publications like National Geographic Magazine to talk about the Ancient Egyptians as well as invited to prestigious colleges like Cambridge to give lectures on the subject.
he was before being debuncked by some experts they said : Keita is biased
its not only my own opinion on him sorry if u have no more infos on him ; but really I don't know why some afro-americans belive that he is a leader ...
@samysamy25 Because I believe in color civilizations? Are you claiming every civilization on earth was made by White people? Why is it that the only people denying the existence of Black African civilizations are racists with no credibility? You have to go back to a time when institutional racism was still the law of the land in the USA to hear any mainstream scholars denying the existence of Black African civilization. It's a racist myth.
the only one who talks about color civilization are afro-americans did u noticed that ?
its like to said that u wanna that all sub-saharans are the same ?! isn't ur real Objectifs and this because of skin color ...but the biggest question is
@samysamy25 What is a color civilization? All I am saying is that Africans who have dark skin color built civilizations. It doesn't matter what views they had about skin color. What matter is that this idea that these people were capable of creating civilization and complex societies which debunk the RACIST MYTHS about them not being able to do so.
sorry Darker does not equal black and for ur Info a lot of sub-saharans claimed themselves for darker NOT BLACK except some nations that are ensalved ...
BLACK as a term is so commun between those who experienced slavery
@samysamy25 For instance can you find me even a single video on Youtube by a historian in good standing amongst mainstream academia who is denying the existence of Black African Civilizations and NOT connected to racist organizations?
@samysamy25 Some Afrocentrists have claimed all North Afican civilizations are Black. I don't believe in that. But on the flip side denial of Black African civilizations is motivated by racism. Trying to claim every Sub-Saharan African culture was really created by light-skinned North Africans is motivated by racist views. Also claiming that Blacks are devolved humans is most certainly racist.
its not racist this is facts ...we have proof about that we respect ur humanity but when we are attacked we must reacted there ... every nation has his NUCLEAR WEAPONS and North africans a serious problem for afrocentrics
who are our ennemies like arabs and Islamists they have prefer that and we cant resist again towards their lies about us ...thats enough !
@solarempire88 I don't have a problem with skeletal biology or the fact that there is anatomical variation between humans. The problem is when you say that anatomy denotes distinct lineages in humans. Human variation is not structured into subspecies ("races"). Race implies that the various traits we observe are consistently correlated and that when we find a trait complex it can be assumed that the complex is unique to specific populations and that it diverged from others.
@solarempire88 No. I acknowledge that there is variation in anatomical traits within and between geographic populations but I would not use those terms to classify these traits because while they are adaptively significant they are not wholly ancestry informative. Traits called Caucasoid (typically a narrow face) could imply ancestry anywhere from Northern Europe to Eastern Africa, India and even among the aboriginal people of Japan. Populations with diverse ancestral lineages.
@solarempire88 When of the more well-known advocates of race in anthropology is George Gill who got involved in the debate over the race of Kennewick Man. Gill insisted that Kennewick Man's craniofacial features were different from the typical Native American and therefore should not be seen as an ancestor of any native tribe but possibly belonged to a group that shared common ancestry with modern Europeans. His facial features were labeled Caucasian. Dental traits however were closer to Ainu.
@solarempire88 Take the example of the concept of Negroid for instance. It is traditionally based on craniofacial features typically ascribed to populations with broad faces. We know that these traits exist but it is the assumption that they denote a unique ancestry that is the problem. Broad craniofacial features are found all over Africa as well as other regions of the world and the genetic evidence indicates that they don't have a common origin. Its just an adaptation to human climate.
@solarempire88 And I was using White in a social context. Those civilizations are indigenous to West Africa. They were not created by non-indigenous people. The people of this region are typically dark-skinned what most people call Black. They were not created by light-skinned people.
Nop ! Ghana Empire as an Example is created by the Amazighs who are originally from the North.Mali people don't claim themsleves as BLACK = Noir . because a lot of them said that : our ancestors are white people from The North we are admixed with fulani and wolof women thats all we are not like other sub-saharans we are muslims
senegalese people claimed themselves as black they said : nous somme noir
I have one friend from senegal to him Islam represents his life not his skin
@DaTruth2024 Yea I pretty much agree with what you just said. And there are also the huge stone structures in Zimbabwe that are pretty old. But it's rare that you hear anyone talk about those
There's alot of interesting research in this video about African ethnic groups and population genetics but I think you crashed and burned at the end with the rhetoric about Afrocentrists claiming non Sub-Saharan cultures as part of their heritage because they are ashamed of slavery as well as using outdated racial terminology like Negroid. North Africa is not racially divorced from the rest of the African continent. It is apart of Africa and Africa is very culturally and biologically diverse.
@MysticNinjaJay Well it's like the difference between Indians and Chinese (or east Asians in general). They share the same continent, and actually live much closer to eachother than the black Africans do to the North Africans, but they look absolutely nothing alike and have very different cultures and languages as well. They're able to remain separate distinct because in both cases you have a geographic barrier that is difficult to cross.
@MysticNinjaJay Well my entire point was that Africa is a place not a race of people and especially not a single culture. In the US we use "Asian" as a racial term but when we talk about Asians we aren't talking about everyone from continental Asia. Because technically India, Russia, and the Middle East are also part of Asia.
@MysticNinjaJay " as well as using outdated racial terminology like Negroid"
The term Negroid still used by many anthropologists, especially physical anthropologists working in the forensic field of craniofacial anthropometry. You can tell a persons race from a skeleton, a skull, even a single bone. If there was no such thing as race how could this be possible?
@solarempire88 Phenotypes exist. There are variations in anatomical trait complexes and these can be distinguished via forensic analysis however a common misconception of racialists is that race is synonymous with biological differences between populations. It is not. The concept of race implies that external traits denote distinct ancestral lineages. Race is synonymous with Darwin's concept of a sub-species which is defined as an evolutionarily distinct breeding population.
@solarempire88 No human population fits the criteria for phylogenetic subspecies. Kittles and Long (2003) noted the following reasons why standard biological concept of race fails to describe the nature of human biological variation....
(1) There are no agreed-upon criteria for when to assign formal
names to groups that might more appropriately be considered aggregates of local
populations. (2) Race classifications fail for phenotypically intermediate populations. (3) They fail for individuals who trace their ancestry to two or more named races. (4) They are defied by sets of characters that show independent geographic trends.
@MysticNinjaJay Personally I don't agree. I believe in the traditional view that human races are biologically valid and real.Forensic anthropologist are overwhelmingly in support of the idea of the basic biological reality of human races.They attain a high degree of accuracy in determining geographic racial affinities (white, black, American Indian, ) by utilizing both new and traditional methods of bone analysis.
The industrial revolution definitely can be claimed t happen in Britain, but England/Britain didn't exist in a vacuum. Mathematics was used, Mathematics created outside of Europe. The Cotton gin was also non european.
The world that gave birth to the Industrial Revolution is old too me. You just chose that time to be the modern, but earlier dates can be chosen or even later dates. IMO, the modern world is the Information age.
Even if you use the Industrial Revolution as a marker, the things that made that Revolution had non european influence. Such as Roads, Iron work, Machine building, Canals, etc. Ever thought about the mathematics that was used to create the Industrial Revolution?
Are talking about "a cranium found in a cave in Morocco, Africa, the so called "Jebel Irhoud 1" has been difficult to date. But it's believed to be in the vicinity of 100,000 to 200,000 years old." There are skulls in China and Zambia that are just as old. The oldest archaic sapien fossil is a skull from Java dated 700,000 years ago.
its not Jebel Irhoud by the way he represents another proof of Homonoid continuity of Ifri N'Ammar ...WTF 700.000 u said ?! those of java are homo-erectus NOT HOMO-SAPIENS , In Morocco we have Homo-erectus and homo-habilis to 3 millions of years ;)
and those of china so younger around 100kya to 40kya !!!
@samysamy25 it was an article I read a while back it said archaic sapien. Still it proves that man was already evolving...of course Africa is the birthplace of mankind there are probably a lot more all over the continent which suggests that a single ancestral population with modern features spread out rapidly across Africa, Asia, and Europe. "Anthropologists believe these widespread modern human characteristics indicate a recent common origin." Therefore, all humans have a common ancestor.
@samysamy25 back to your video must American African diaspora think anything Africa="Black". "Black" only in a social economic term. The idea is that all Africans have been oppressed by some foreign force. My opinion is that if your from Africa you are a "brotha".
"African American culture developed seperately from mainstream American culture"
I noticed you featured Jimmy Hendrix there. Well he was part of the psychadelic cultural movement which, despite him, was predominantely white. So you couldn't quite say he was seperate from white "mainstream" culture .
Skulldini 2 weeks ago
Haha One day Humanity will wake up and see videos like this is foolish. The point their were slaves is nothing African Americans should be ashamed of its something Humanity as a whole SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF. Showing this video to expose what ? How petty and cave man life humanity use to be ? Humanity history as a whole has been rewritten so much that who is to say they are wrong ? I love humanity but I go with Native Americans on this one never trust data that has European anywhere near it. haha
grownman455 6 months ago
good video you exposed their true history ...well done samy.
keysi07 7 months ago
Excellent Video. Exposes them very well,
ahmedzs1 7 months ago
Im not ashamed of my African heritage. So that statement shouldnt apply to every African American.
chibi171 8 months ago
What I want to know is were there ever an "North African civilization" in Subsahara Africa? I have heard the claims of how North Africans brought the practice of Agriculture to central Africa....hmmm...but damn, I thought iron was first discover in subsahara Africa's southeast Nigeria northwest-Cameroon region....interesting
jimilli09 8 months ago
TALKING LOUD, SAYING NUTHIN' IS A OLD POPULAR SAYING AMONG US OLDER BANTU/SUDANIC/NIGER/MIXED CHILDERN OF SLAVE NIGGAS. THAT'S WHAT YOUR VIDEO OF THEORIES AND HALF TRUTHS MIXED WITH SHARP EDITING AND SUB-SAHARAN RYTHMS IS. EXCUSE MY WEST AFRICAN- INFLUENCED ENGLISH AND SPELLING. SOUNDS LIKE ONE OF DEM AFRO-CENTRIST TOOK YOUR SWEET THANG OR LAID SOME BANTU KNUCKLES ON U.
mixmixsim 8 months ago
They came from KINGS, QUEENS, SOLDIER, PEASANTS, and COMMON PEOPLE in AFRICA!!!! ;) We had KINGDOMS, EMPIRES, AND DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLICS!!!! ;) WHAT'S TO BE ASHAMED OF??!!!! _V_ (Peace)
chukwuemeka23456 9 months ago
@chukwuemeka23456 Poor low IQ nigger... they were remissive slaves that came from their stinky mud huts lol. Egyptians were obviously white mediterraneans the craniofacial structure of their ancient skulls is typical of mediterranean europoids. Not negroids lol. Tutankhamon was R1b. Negroids don't have create simply NOTHING. Sub-saharan Africa, historically, is a total BLACK HOLE. Cause negroids are just inferior your average IQ is 67 lol see the chart:
/wiki/IQ_and_Global_Inequality
patres818 1 month ago
this shit is a BIG JOKE hahahah!!
2 many inconsistencies LOL he said sahara dessert LMAO
sahara means dessert
any1 with sense knows bantus are central(partially) and south africa LOL
west africans are not bantu they are KWA
i should know im igbo HAHAHA
also the numbers of the slave trade arent even accurate
you waste ppls time with non sense
MrRobyopunkass 9 months ago
@MrRobyopunkass what is the difference between Kwa and Bantu?
PunchOjr 9 months ago
@jubilee203 85 percent of this video is bullshit. Not too much of a surprise coming from the guy who believes that the Kingdom of Mali was founded and ruled by Caucasoids. Smfh
TutankhAusar 11 months ago
I am black and I do agree with most of what this video has mentioned. I don't know why someone should be ashamed that they're from sub-sahara Africa. Slavery is not a curse, it's a criminal act with no justice. Nothing to be ashamed of. Raping, kidnapping, and slaving are just barbaric act. People that rapes and kill other people are just people with better weapon. Having better weapon does not make one superior. Black people in America are just bantus, accept it.
jubilee203 1 year ago
@samysamy75 is morocco/west sahara counting as a west african country?
SalihProductions 1 year ago
@SalihProductions
Lol ! Morocco is located in Extrem Northren North west africa - North of North african Sahara
a greenland with the Great Mountains called atlas mountains similar to alpine mountains of europe Morocco is so known by his Mediteranean climate similar to southern european environements like spain Italy Greece ....
watch this : /watch?v=cGX4Ro1NkX4
or this :
/watch?v=I2iNKCZJ5tg
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 What are Somalis?
Abdikarimelmi 2 months ago
@SalihProductions ***in fact, negroids are a relatively a recent phenomena***
~chortle~
akaroyalljelly 8 months ago
Hendrix was mixed.
aaronscrewme 1 year ago
et ben je savais pas qu e t as une vid aussi importante que celle ci .
bonne harmonie musique image .
Well done Sam.
MrsSANTICHKA 1 year ago
this vid is only partially right, full of half truths good work for what it is though...
dmthead2012 1 year ago
Damm this guy is racist! what a wasteman! he has hate running trough his backward vain's, I Suggest that intelligent people looking for intelligent debate refrain from wasting their time on this buffoon! we all know no one credible in academia adhere's to this racist gobbledigook, this guy is just looking for a negative argument so that he feed off it! he is a SET FORCE energy seeker, another "Jerusalem Muslim Father of the kabala just another weak ass scholar" ignore his Neanderthal Ass!!!
jumz82 1 year ago
there is no limit for being a african american you dumbass, if you have a african nationality (north african, south african etc) and you emigrated to america you are an afro (african american)
DeliciousOnion 1 year ago
@DeliciousOnion
does japanese equals indian since they are Asiatics ?
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 India is not a continent, its a country... So indian people are from asia (continent) like all the other countrys in asia
DeliciousOnion 1 year ago
@DeliciousOnion
India is in Asia ... and ASIA is a continent ... so are Indians the same as Japanese or ... are chinese the same as Russians for Example ? if to you african = afro-american then let me know ... does North african equals sub-saharan?
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Im not saying that if your african your a african-american, i am saying that if you are from african descend and you was born in america/ emigrated to america you are a afro american
DeliciousOnion 1 year ago
@DeliciousOnion
Yeah it the same for chinese americans and Indian americans cause they are all Asian-Americans :)
so afro-american does Not = BLACK or sub-saharan since it was a continental Term not associated with race of skin color
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 well, i am from west african descend and live in america (im black) but in your video i am not counting as a afro-american?
DeliciousOnion 1 year ago
@DeliciousOnion
yeah you are an afro-american of sub-saharan west african descend ....
samysamy25 1 year ago
@DeliciousOnion
its titled african americans sub-saharan and european roots - its about those of trans-atlantic slavery-
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 how do you expalin the negroid peoples of paupa new guinea or the other micronesian lisands like Vanuatu and the soloman islands? How did they get there? please anwser me that. please sammy please answer me. how did the people of paupa new guinea and the miscronesian islands get there? Look into Austro-Melanesian History. The european caveman was 30,000 years ago. The people of the south pacific were already there 50,000 years ago. this video is misleading
redcapsnmacs 1 year ago
@redcapsnmacs
they weren't from 50Kya ...but about 20.000BC and they are BIOLOGICALLY asiatic People NOT closer or related to africans sub-saharans ....they does not look like negroids at this time but of ARCHAIC FEATURES similar to that of Homo.Heidlbergensies .... they look negroids because of tropical environements and chimical effects of this equatorial areas ....its the same case for negroids sub-saharans africans ...they Never look like their real ancestors
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 well, I am from west african descend, im black and i life in america, but in your video you arnt counting me as a african-american
DeliciousOnion 1 year ago
i like the vid.
watchMEshyne 1 year ago
Fucking sub saharan africans trying to claim North Africa (the only good part of Africa)
Moatw001 1 year ago
Comment removed
sandmanhater 1 year ago
@sandmanhater ya ppl r losers so fuck u and MALI WAS NEVA WHITE SOUNDS LIKE U PPL R THE THEIVES OF HISTORY
mrabdullah71 1 year ago
Great video, those afrocentrists get on my nerves. They also try to make fake claims about my people. I think they claim other race's civilizations because they are jealous.
sandmanhater 1 year ago
@sandmanhater
you are right my friend :)
samysamy25 1 year ago
I am not clear what the point of your video is really. We all descend from an ancient Egyptian man who was E1b1 anyway so we are all brothers no matter what we look like. This is our massive and super-successful clan!
UpyritzKazimir 1 year ago
@UpyritzKazimir
Lol !! of course Not ...we are not brothers to you or to bantuids ...the Lineage PN2 is originated in North Africa before 30.000BC his ancestor E1b1 DOES NOT LOOK LIKE BANTU ....your real brothers are the pygmies and khoisans since you are closer to them MATERNALLY both by L1c, L0a , L2a1a1 and L2a2 - L2a1b , L2c , L2d mtDNA 's this your massive-successful clan and RACIAL REALITY
BS: bantuids are the result of an ancient admixture between Proto-caucasians and archaic humans
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 your reply is also confusing. "we are not brothers to you or to bantuids" do you know what I look like? Who are you to say we aren't allowed to take whoever we want for wives? Your mother is a descendant of L2, L1 and L0. Do you hate your mother? Prodigal Hitler is the most ugly in our fraternity. He also hated his mother. Don't walk in his prodigal footsteps.
UpyritzKazimir 1 year ago
@UpyritzKazimir
Nop ! L-mtDNA sequences weren't the same and the most of our females are from L3 the most divergent Eurasian female .. bantuids had their specific females Like L1c1 and L1a1 In common with Pygmies .those females are NOT Humans but more closet to chimps and Monkeys wich is explains why sub-saharans had an Erectus features its because of admixture and DEVOLUTION
Hitler had nothing with you or to your lumped theories . PN2 is from 30KYA an expulsed men from North africa case Closed
samysamy25 1 year ago
seriously all these are projected to make sure sub saharans have nothing to do with north african and egypt civilization but you forget the whole sub sahara had thier own civilization that out match the greek eg ghana empire and the yorubas.africa is africa and europe is europe leave it like that.what ever comes out of africa leave it to africans and what ever comes out of europe should be for europeans stop trying to divide us.we have intermarried and traded for thousands of years.
bashr4 1 year ago
@bashr4
ghana ; sounghai and mali empires are made and controled /Invaded by white people like Moroccans and touaregs plus spaniards ; there is nothing Negroid as civilisation in west sub-saharan africa
these civilization is typically from sahel and saharan area not the sub-saharan west africa !
africa is our continent before ur presence in her since she is our word wich means in our language THE COLD CAVE . Greecks are connected to us NOT u BANTUS and we are WHITE NATIVES OF AFRICA
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 ok now i cannot continue this arguments cause your no longer making sense , the igbos have been in sub sahara africa for over 5000bc they had a republican system of government even before the greeks, i dont know the war you have with afrocentrics but dont try distort peoples history, they even had pyramids built with muds had writting similar to that of ancient egypt ,they had there own days and years and money arts and there no diff btwenn ancisnt igbo trad and modern one.
bashr4 1 year ago
@bashr4
HAHAHA wrong again the first appearance of bantus tribes is after 1500BC to 1000AD during their expansion in Equatorial africa ; Igbo had admixed caucaziod blood in them from the Huasa tribes who are originally Asiatics eurasian before 12.000BC . Igbos don't have any system except their life with monkeys and Gorillas ; of course yes , bantuids had no relation with pyramids or anyhting since the first bantu wrinting is appeared at 1945 . stop lying ..pathetic and so stupid ur lies
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 honsetly if bantus migrated does not mean there were no indiginous tribes in the subsahara , even the hausa and fulani are in sub sahara but they are of afroa-asiatic, besides not all north africans consider them selves whites anyway its not my buisness you should know better about your people but like the europeans and american whites dont rob others of a legacy they are part of it does no one any good.
bashr4 1 year ago
@bashr4
bantus are not natives of west sub-saharan africa ; cause they are a recent phenomena of admixed Proto-caucaziod and archaic african human species plus their admixed with gymies and khoisans
those afro-asiatics people of saharan and sahel area are from north africa ; anthroplogically and genetically its prove it . Go to my video why ethiopian have caucasian features !
Lol .biologically we are 100% african but we are white in fact other africans are less 10% africans like camerronians
samysamy25 1 year ago
Really? So west african civilizations have nothing to do with west africa? Is that why the cultures of Mali, Songhai, and Benin had nothing to do with that of whites? Tuaregs made timbuktu but indigenous africans turned it into a learning centre. Sankore university's most renowned scholars were WA. Morrocans invaded Mali and ruled it for like a decade before the assholes left and let the country fall to other tribes. No credible historian agrees with that shit, you retard motherfucker
TutankhAusar 1 year ago
@TutankhAusar
the cultures of Mali, Songhai, and Benin had nothing with bantuids , those cultures are made and ruled by white people not sub-saharans bantuids
samysamy25 1 year ago
You truely fail at all things relating to history. Mali being a white culture isn't even heard of, jesus being African has more credibility than the shit you've just said. No historian in his right mind would ever say Mali was white, dude, not even the most racist of all Eurocentric scholars would make that argument. Look at the background image of my channel and tell me that Benins Bronze Art was made by a white culture. West African empires were ruled by a Bantu speaking ppl, idiot. Bantuids
TutankhAusar 1 year ago
Ok, so this is mostly about Bantu migrations. I don't get your point. What/Who is saying amongst the AA community that they are not partially of these people (People of west Africa are not Bantu)? Certainly not me. Who is ashamed of slavery, certainly not me. WE ARE STILL HERE!!! This is a source of pride and strength, FYI. What is your source again for "Negroids" being relatively new, on earth? New compared to who?
LordMungu 1 year ago
adfas
ihateimall 1 year ago
Rh Negative is short for Rhesus Factor Negative. Virtually 90% of Europe is Rh Positive..which means their genes include a specific chain of dna from a Rhesus Monkey.
The highest level of Rh- in any region of the world is in the Karaites people of Iraq with 53 per cent of the Rh-negative Cde complex. 50% of the Basque population is Rh-negative. The next highest levels are in Wales and Scotland. The Karaites are actually a Jewish sect that rarely inter marry outside their own blood lines
greenmagoos 1 year ago
Rhesus Negative blood
watch?v=zND_NDIvQHM
greenmagoos 1 year ago
Negroid is an outdated racialist term. It is completely rejected by credible anthropologists. It is a racist term and how appropriate that it is used in this racist video.
HelpTheWorld91 1 year ago
Nice video but a few things are flawed. AAs are not 'ashamed' of their history as slaves. It's actually viewed as a bout of honor to be a survivor those who've committed suicide. I think you should spend some time getting to know AA culture. Now concerning the Bantu expansion, I've seen very few geneticists, anthropologists, archaeologists agree on where this expansion began. BUT we must note something: Bantus are South Africans not West Africans...at least linguistically anyway.
jimilli09 1 year ago
@jimilli09
This video is good for you,and I hope you enjoyed your histories,and be proud of what belongs to you, instead of claiming something that never belong to you.
African American = Bantu descendant or type2 Bantoid
mars3400 1 year ago
@mars3400
Like your Fulani mommy? Lol awwww the irony....it's amazing how someone who is not you can come in and not only divide you according to how they see fit..but tell you what you are at the same time....now little maid girl leave me alone...I have no idea how this month old mashpah ended up in my comments box....ADIOS!
jimilli09 1 year ago
Afro Americans are Pan African in their heritage. Slaves were taken from all over the continent and brought to the coast in West and Central Africa, Although most of the Slaves were of West African descent. Many West Africans now residing in their areas originally descend from Central Saharan / North Central African Negroid populations. Like the Mande and Wolof in your list for example.
Focusingmuch 1 year ago
@Focusingmuch
Not from all over the continent ,WRONG again
its only from sub-saharan west africa to central and southern africa
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 i have dna from the great lakes area and i am carbbean...
dmthead2012 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Not according to this woman from her Mtdna.
youtube . com / watch ? v = hZzQU3 dT9DA
Mtdna >
buubi, tikar, hausa, fula
Hausa (Afro Asiatic) originate in North Africa Sudan (Nubia)
Fula (Nilo Saharan) originate in North African (Central Sahara)
Tikar (Niger Congo) originate in Central Africa.
From her Mtdna she is Pan African culturally and linguistically etc. And this is only her Mtdna!!, she hasn't even genetically tested where her Y chromosome comes from!!!
Focusingmuch 1 year ago
@Focusingmuch it seems that you do not know what Pan Africanism is. Do you see African Americans trying to unite themselves, Africans and others of African heritage? I have never seen such. The only time such a movement was birthed was during the Civil Rights Era. So learn more African American history and put aside the theories...which is mostly what ppl say about us. Another thought concerning African Americans, our cultures vary from region to region so Samy really strewed up this time.
jimilli09 1 year ago
Eurocentrism = White Supremacy = Fairytales
BOYCOTTFOXNEWS 1 year ago 2
This guy samy is a fucking fraud.
BOYCOTTFOXNEWS 1 year ago
i don't know about , Greek and Phoenician, but we do have Jewish and Moorish roots!!! look at jimili's channel(for example) He's and African-American with Tuareg (Moorish) roots. Plus, people from his Tuareg, Kanuri and Fulani tribes have Jewish roots as well!!! There is the Lemba tribe in South Africa with Jewish roots, and there are Igbo tribes( one of the areas with slave trade) with potential Jewish roots, AND CUSTOMS SIMILAR TO THE JEWISH CULTURE!!!
chukwuemeka23456 1 year ago
@chukwuemeka23456 An AA who claims to be a Phoenician or a Greek?! This ish is funny..I never heard of this in my life. Now there are so afrocentrics who claim Moorish ancestry due to European labeling of certain Islamic slave groups. These afrocentrics are the Moorish Science Temple and their lovechild group: NOI. Now for those of us who have genetic proof...yeah, I'm dying to see someone disprove it. By the way, I'm 100% anti-Afrocentric....just the facts.
jimilli09 1 year ago
Plus, NOT ALL OF THE "SUB-SAHARAN" Africans are BANTU'S. If you knew ANYTHING, you would know that FIRST OF ALL, there are some africans that not even BANTIOD (let ALONE Bantu). Some one from West Africa DOESN'T LOOK LIKE someone from EAST AFRICA!!! Someone from East African DOESN'T LOOK LIKE SOMEONE FROM CENTRAL OR SOUTHERN AFRICA!!! Secondly, WE ALL HAVE UNIQUE CULTURES, AND next TO ARABS, WE ARE ONE OF THE MOST DIVERSITY PEOPLE ON THE EARTH!!! PLUS, THEY'RE ARE DARKSKINNED PEOPLE...
chukwuemeka23456 1 year ago 2
so as a somali, i'm a meditid?
firefrostpeacemaker 1 year ago
@firefrostpeacemaker
somalis are aethiopids wich means paternally Mediteranean of North african roots with Maternal East african origins
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 i see, so your a berber?
firefrostpeacemaker 1 year ago
@firefrostpeacemaker
Yeah I am an Amazigh :)
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 so do you know the actual genome of a Somali man such as myself?
firefrostpeacemaker 1 year ago
@samysamy25 ok one more thing, what's the song it's awesome!
firefrostpeacemaker 1 year ago
Good video but it goes downhill with the nonsense about "Afrocentrics" and what not. You should take that mess out or at least give some examples of the people you are talking about and exactly WHY whatever they claim is incorrect.
AfricaTeacher 1 year ago
@AfricaTeacher
like urs of course , I am looking to Debuncking the East african origin of Humanity
and of course proved that Negroids are simply a recent case of OUR DEVOLUTION
In comparaison with Non-African Negroids ..not just by the chemical effects of Environements or the biological and archaic Mixtures but also with craniofacial anthropometry
Just Imagine a video tittled : first people of africa are NOT BLACK
so ! go to ur community and tell to them : don't play with the fire ...
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Well what you need to find then Is DNA evidence that does NOT tie the origin of Humaity to sub Saharan East Africa. Good luck trying to make yourself famous. DNA will pretty much trump whatever you find.
AfricaTeacher 1 year ago 2
@AfricaTeacher
Lol ...DNA most of these Phylogenetics traces are simply theories Not Based by the Modern Anthroplogy ....anyhow , first Homo-sapiens were Not Negroids at all ....they are fully Europoids by racial Looking I can prove it so easly ...and as u know human divergence is happened before 140Kya
so , bye-bye khoisans and Pygmies !!!
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 I'd also like to see proof of that as it seems to contradict all the mainstream archeological and genetic evidence that indicates human origins in tropical Africa.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
I no think that scientists claimed that humans are from Tropical africa ... Look at my video = Out of Africa
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 so as a somali, i'm cushid meditid?
firefrostpeacemaker 1 year ago
@samysamy25 hah wtf are you talking about you on crack son!... if europeans were the first homosapeins why do they have the highest amount of neanderthal blood up to 50% in some studies paablo parnters has been quoted saying so? its just common sense lol! you racist pig!
dmthead2012 1 year ago
@dmthead2012
EUROPOIDS does not mean Europeans ; and europeans are not the first people of earth but they have some blood and direct relationship on them from these people
Neanderthals are our brothers baby ...we share with them the same ancestor
really ..50% ?! the most hybrid people with neanderthals were north africans and Not europeans as far the max percentage is around 12%
because there is Neanderthals in North Africa since the late Pleistocene
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25
so....you are a eurocentric?
rebellion1234 1 year ago
@rebellion1234
of course Not if u mean Aryanizm ; Hitler is my cousin ;)
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25
its a simply question.......where is your proof?
rebellion1234 1 year ago
@rebellion1234
come on u talk with Moroccan !! we know our history and no one has any argument towards us ...we are so honest about that ; to us black represents an Insult
if u came here in Morocco u would be so surprised because our nation are so racist towards sub-saharans u can find on google ;Moroccan racism towards black or Blacks experience racism in Morocco
for wikipedia its me who edit the Ghana Article just for ur Info
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25
oooooh you X )
rebellion1234 1 year ago
You forgot the facts that the ancestors of present-day African Americans, Afro-Latinos, and Afro-Caribbeans created kingdoms/civilizations like Mali, Ghana, Songhai, and Kongo. I'm not an Afrocentric and I don't get that many Afro-descent people just can't be proud of out ancestors instead of making up stupid stories of being Hebrews, Native Americans, Egyptians, Moors or trying to link us to Asian empires (South Asia, East Asia, Southeast Asia).
DaTruth2024 1 year ago
@DaTruth2024
kingdoms/civilizations like Mali, Ghana, Songhai ...are Gouverned and created by white people of North african descents like Touaregs or Moroccans but also some Iberians these civilizations are mainly peopled by Fulanis Hausa ,Dogons and some sahel and saharan peoples Not by The bantus of Congo and Nigeria
and those people of sahel and sahara are genetically closer and related to North africans and Europeans than sub-saharans
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Mali, Ghana and Songhai were not governed or created by White people.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
Yeah they were created by Europoid Populations more than that first people of Mali were Europoids and NOT Negroids ...PS: I have the skulls ;)
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 You have the skulls in your position? Really? Seriously though I'd like to see a credible academic source.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
yeah and Plus an official reconstruction .... THEY LOOKS LIKE MODERN EUROPEANS ....
the first people of Mali .....
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Source?
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
I will make a video about that with sources of course ...sorry but I can't give u any link for this ; I wanna to surprise the afrocentrics crushing them so HARD as they can't ever imaginate what I have
samysamy25 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay"Mali, Ghana and Songhai were not governed or created by White people"
Exactly my point on the term Negroid. If we choose to accept the system of racial taxonomy that physical anthropologists have traditionally established—major races: black, white(a term you just used) etc.—then one can classify human skeletons within it just as well as one can living humans. You cannot discredit the evidence of skeletal biology.
solarempire88 1 year ago
@solarempire88
Mali, Ghana and Songhai were not governed or created by White people
yeah because of North african muslim Influence on west africa u can't deny this fact !! but also those empires are conquered and controled by touaregs or Moroccans and some cities are declared as North african territories and build by spaniards or Moroccans and touaregs !
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 *adaptation to humid climate
Likewise Caucasoid, Mongoloid and other racial categories are not scientifically valid.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
Nop ! wrong again ....adaptation is due to radiation and Hot climatic effects
most of caucaziod who are so diverse are admixed with other Unknown species semilar to Homo-Redhonesian or homo-florensis specially those of south of sahara ;bantuid face is not due to climate but with an hybrid admixture of proto-caucaziods with archaic homonoids ....
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Homo-Redhonesian? Never heard of it. If you're not going to give me your sources on these racial theories then I will wait for your video. Until I see credible evidence to the contrary I'm sticking to mainstream concepts in evolutionary biology on the diversity of human traits.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
Go to Anthroscape forum -Paleo-Anthroplogy section and read my articles ;)
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 What is your screenname?
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay samysamy25
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Hi Samy. What is your opinion on the terms Caucasoid,Negroid etc..? Do you believe them to be invalid?
solarempire88 1 year ago
@solarempire88
NOP ! Valid ....
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 I agree as well.
solarempire88 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Alot of Afrocentrics are adopting the term "Black African" and calling terms like Caucasoid,Negroid irrelevant in order to place themselves in Egypt.Of course when using the term Black African they refer specifically to Negroids.
solarempire88 1 year ago
@solarempire88
as u know egypt has nothing with afro-americans ... yeah she is an african civilization but this does not = black !! africa is a continent not race or color
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 I know.I find it amusing that Afro Americans are attempting to claim ancestry to Egypt.
solarempire88 1 year ago
@solarempire88 Most African-Americans who identify with Ancient Egypt and know a bit about the history of African cultures know that they are not directly descended from Ancient Egyptians but see Egypt as a Black civilization. The Ancient Egyptians were a native African people who would have looked like your average tropical East African.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
Hmmm ... ARE U SERIOUS biggest claim we have here
so according to u there is such thing like : black civilization ?
explain to me how they aren't not directly linked to ancient egyptians ?
u know that east africans are genetically NOT CLOSER or related to west african groups at all ...tropics ? and In east africa ...they are Pastoralists originally from saharan area ...BTW ancient egyptians had nothing with east africans
TOTALLY DEBUNCKED THIS ONE
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Denying Black civilizations is a bit like Holocaust Denial. No credible mainstream modern scholar takes it seriously. Shomarka Keita who you mention in the video tags proved empirically that the Ancient Egyptians were biologically linked to more Southerly Africans such as Nubians, Somali and Oromo. Their language and culture were introduced to the Nile Valley from East Africa. There's also some Saharan influence but Northwest Africa was not always populated by lighter skinned people.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
Nop ! its not a denial cause u believe in color civilizations ! ! !
Shomarka Keita ....ask @Salassin if u wanna what he said because what u claimed about him is totally a bunch of lies ...to me Keita is so Biased ! biologically ?! ..really ...so find this Video /watch?v=sOhEtxi6Skc
saharan influence in Northwest africa is due to slavery like other parts of North africa and thats has nothing with native North africans ..afro-asian languages are introduced by Europoid Populations
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 If you go to Salsassin's videos you will find comments I made about emailing Keita myself to ask him more direct questions about what the Ancient Egyptians looked like and he confirmed what I am saying about his work. I have screenshots for proof. How is Keita biased. He's a respected Biological Anthropologist. Afroasiatic was introduced to North Africa and the Middle East from East Africa. Look up the work of Christopher Ehret.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
of course Not I can't respect such PROPAGANDIST like this one ; and who can foreget his claims of Badarian with Tropic teeth ?! he is so Biased ....Now he can't Understand why North africans had the most oldest caucasian females in the world ....his PAN-BLAKCNESS of course do u think really that I can respect him ...oh ! No ..Plz ! ever Now ...he said amazighs are related to chadic and ancient egyptians just this but he can't said they are Amazighs ! so Hard for him
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Tropical teeth? What article did he say this in? Keita doesn't prescribe to Pan-Blackness. Again he is a respected Biological Anthropologist he has been consulted by mainstream academic publications like National Geographic Magazine to talk about the Ancient Egyptians as well as invited to prestigious colleges like Cambridge to give lectures on the subject.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
he was before being debuncked by some experts they said : Keita is biased
its not only my own opinion on him sorry if u have no more infos on him ; but really I don't know why some afro-americans belive that he is a leader ...
because he is an afro-american perhaps ?!
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 I have never heard a single scholar say that Keita is biased let alone give examples why. If what you say is true provide sources.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
yeah there is sources about that but I am still awaiting for the next claims of Keita
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 If you're claiming that scholars have said Keita is biased then surely you have sources. What Salsassin video are you talking about?
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Because I believe in color civilizations? Are you claiming every civilization on earth was made by White people? Why is it that the only people denying the existence of Black African civilizations are racists with no credibility? You have to go back to a time when institutional racism was still the law of the land in the USA to hear any mainstream scholars denying the existence of Black African civilization. It's a racist myth.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
the only one who talks about color civilization are afro-americans did u noticed that ?
its like to said that u wanna that all sub-saharans are the same ?! isn't ur real Objectifs and this because of skin color ...but the biggest question is
did sub-saharans believe in Black ?! as color ...
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 What is a color civilization? All I am saying is that Africans who have dark skin color built civilizations. It doesn't matter what views they had about skin color. What matter is that this idea that these people were capable of creating civilization and complex societies which debunk the RACIST MYTHS about them not being able to do so.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
sorry Darker does not equal black and for ur Info a lot of sub-saharans claimed themselves for darker NOT BLACK except some nations that are ensalved ...
BLACK as a term is so commun between those who experienced slavery
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Black is a socially-constructed Western label that has been used for many dark-skinned people all over the world.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
Nop ! did u watched the salassin video about black color ?!
maybe u can change ur ideas ;)
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 For instance can you find me even a single video on Youtube by a historian in good standing amongst mainstream academia who is denying the existence of Black African Civilizations and NOT connected to racist organizations?
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
actually afrocentrics works to claimed that North african civilization are black ...so because.... why ? RACISM or ANTI-european Agendas ...
if there is a color civilization so why she must be under a contact with foreign people who aren't DARKER ;) and not black
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 Some Afrocentrists have claimed all North Afican civilizations are Black. I don't believe in that. But on the flip side denial of Black African civilizations is motivated by racism. Trying to claim every Sub-Saharan African culture was really created by light-skinned North Africans is motivated by racist views. Also claiming that Blacks are devolved humans is most certainly racist.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
its not racist this is facts ...we have proof about that we respect ur humanity but when we are attacked we must reacted there ... every nation has his NUCLEAR WEAPONS and North africans a serious problem for afrocentrics
who are our ennemies like arabs and Islamists they have prefer that and we cant resist again towards their lies about us ...thats enough !
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 The Yoruba's (another tribe with slave history) HAD A CIVILIZATION DEAD SIMILAR TO THE EGYPTIANS!!!!
chukwuemeka23456 1 year ago
@chukwuemeka23456
VANDALISM = AFROCENTRIZM
OH yeah I know Marsian Civilization is Dead culture semilir to SHAKA ZULU Dance ,I know that ...
samysamy25 1 year ago
@solarempire88
Yeah I see that In some afro-vids it seems that they are so obsessed .... I remember my first conversation with an afro-american on INSPEAK
he is so surprised when he see that I am not sub-saharan because he think before that all africans are black !!
samysamy25 1 year ago
@solarempire88 I don't have a problem with skeletal biology or the fact that there is anatomical variation between humans. The problem is when you say that anatomy denotes distinct lineages in humans. Human variation is not structured into subspecies ("races"). Race implies that the various traits we observe are consistently correlated and that when we find a trait complex it can be assumed that the complex is unique to specific populations and that it diverged from others.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay "I don't have a problem with skeletal biology or the fact that there is anatomical variation between humans"
Meaning you accept terms like Caucasoid, Negroid when it comes to skeletal biology?
solarempire88 1 year ago
@solarempire88 No. I acknowledge that there is variation in anatomical traits within and between geographic populations but I would not use those terms to classify these traits because while they are adaptively significant they are not wholly ancestry informative. Traits called Caucasoid (typically a narrow face) could imply ancestry anywhere from Northern Europe to Eastern Africa, India and even among the aboriginal people of Japan. Populations with diverse ancestral lineages.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@solarempire88 When of the more well-known advocates of race in anthropology is George Gill who got involved in the debate over the race of Kennewick Man. Gill insisted that Kennewick Man's craniofacial features were different from the typical Native American and therefore should not be seen as an ancestor of any native tribe but possibly belonged to a group that shared common ancestry with modern Europeans. His facial features were labeled Caucasian. Dental traits however were closer to Ainu.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@solarempire88 Take the example of the concept of Negroid for instance. It is traditionally based on craniofacial features typically ascribed to populations with broad faces. We know that these traits exist but it is the assumption that they denote a unique ancestry that is the problem. Broad craniofacial features are found all over Africa as well as other regions of the world and the genetic evidence indicates that they don't have a common origin. Its just an adaptation to human climate.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@solarempire88 And I was using White in a social context. Those civilizations are indigenous to West Africa. They were not created by non-indigenous people. The people of this region are typically dark-skinned what most people call Black. They were not created by light-skinned people.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
Nop ! Ghana Empire as an Example is created by the Amazighs who are originally from the North.Mali people don't claim themsleves as BLACK = Noir . because a lot of them said that : our ancestors are white people from The North we are admixed with fulani and wolof women thats all we are not like other sub-saharans we are muslims
senegalese people claimed themselves as black they said : nous somme noir
I have one friend from senegal to him Islam represents his life not his skin
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 I have never read a modern mainstram academic source that claims that the Amazigh create the Ghana Empire. What is your evidence?
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay
my sources is from Tarikh al-Fettash ; google it on wikipedia
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25
.............wikipedia....lol
rebellion1234 1 year ago
@DaTruth2024 Yea I pretty much agree with what you just said. And there are also the huge stone structures in Zimbabwe that are pretty old. But it's rare that you hear anyone talk about those
jmsnooks 1 year ago
There's alot of interesting research in this video about African ethnic groups and population genetics but I think you crashed and burned at the end with the rhetoric about Afrocentrists claiming non Sub-Saharan cultures as part of their heritage because they are ashamed of slavery as well as using outdated racial terminology like Negroid. North Africa is not racially divorced from the rest of the African continent. It is apart of Africa and Africa is very culturally and biologically diverse.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay Well it's like the difference between Indians and Chinese (or east Asians in general). They share the same continent, and actually live much closer to eachother than the black Africans do to the North Africans, but they look absolutely nothing alike and have very different cultures and languages as well. They're able to remain separate distinct because in both cases you have a geographic barrier that is difficult to cross.
jmsnooks 1 year ago
@jmsnooks Yes, like I said African people are culturally and genetically diverse.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay Well my entire point was that Africa is a place not a race of people and especially not a single culture. In the US we use "Asian" as a racial term but when we talk about Asians we aren't talking about everyone from continental Asia. Because technically India, Russia, and the Middle East are also part of Asia.
jmsnooks 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay " as well as using outdated racial terminology like Negroid"
The term Negroid still used by many anthropologists, especially physical anthropologists working in the forensic field of craniofacial anthropometry. You can tell a persons race from a skeleton, a skull, even a single bone. If there was no such thing as race how could this be possible?
solarempire88 1 year ago
@solarempire88 Phenotypes exist. There are variations in anatomical trait complexes and these can be distinguished via forensic analysis however a common misconception of racialists is that race is synonymous with biological differences between populations. It is not. The concept of race implies that external traits denote distinct ancestral lineages. Race is synonymous with Darwin's concept of a sub-species which is defined as an evolutionarily distinct breeding population.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@solarempire88 No human population fits the criteria for phylogenetic subspecies. Kittles and Long (2003) noted the following reasons why standard biological concept of race fails to describe the nature of human biological variation....
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@solarempire88
(1) There are no agreed-upon criteria for when to assign formal
names to groups that might more appropriately be considered aggregates of local
populations. (2) Race classifications fail for phenotypically intermediate populations. (3) They fail for individuals who trace their ancestry to two or more named races. (4) They are defied by sets of characters that show independent geographic trends.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@solarempire88
(5) It has been difficult to relate many human populations as distinct evolutionary lineages.
MysticNinjaJay 1 year ago
@MysticNinjaJay Personally I don't agree. I believe in the traditional view that human races are biologically valid and real.Forensic anthropologist are overwhelmingly in support of the idea of the basic biological reality of human races.They attain a high degree of accuracy in determining geographic racial affinities (white, black, American Indian, ) by utilizing both new and traditional methods of bone analysis.
solarempire88 1 year ago
@TheHyperboreanzenith
The industrial revolution definitely can be claimed t happen in Britain, but England/Britain didn't exist in a vacuum. Mathematics was used, Mathematics created outside of Europe. The Cotton gin was also non european.
The whole world learns from others.
godofthisshit 1 year ago
@TheHyperboreanzenith
The world that gave birth to the Industrial Revolution is old too me. You just chose that time to be the modern, but earlier dates can be chosen or even later dates. IMO, the modern world is the Information age.
Even if you use the Industrial Revolution as a marker, the things that made that Revolution had non european influence. Such as Roads, Iron work, Machine building, Canals, etc. Ever thought about the mathematics that was used to create the Industrial Revolution?
godofthisshit 1 year ago
@TheHyperboreanzenith
Almost everything that we associated with Europe or the modern world develop outside of Europe, or was built upon non-european development.
godofthisshit 1 year ago
Are talking about "a cranium found in a cave in Morocco, Africa, the so called "Jebel Irhoud 1" has been difficult to date. But it's believed to be in the vicinity of 100,000 to 200,000 years old." There are skulls in China and Zambia that are just as old. The oldest archaic sapien fossil is a skull from Java dated 700,000 years ago.
osiruskat 1 year ago
@osiruskat
its not Jebel Irhoud by the way he represents another proof of Homonoid continuity of Ifri N'Ammar ...WTF 700.000 u said ?! those of java are homo-erectus NOT HOMO-SAPIENS , In Morocco we have Homo-erectus and homo-habilis to 3 millions of years ;)
and those of china so younger around 100kya to 40kya !!!
samysamy25 1 year ago
@samysamy25 it was an article I read a while back it said archaic sapien. Still it proves that man was already evolving...of course Africa is the birthplace of mankind there are probably a lot more all over the continent which suggests that a single ancestral population with modern features spread out rapidly across Africa, Asia, and Europe. "Anthropologists believe these widespread modern human characteristics indicate a recent common origin." Therefore, all humans have a common ancestor.
osiruskat 1 year ago
@samysamy25 back to your video must American African diaspora think anything Africa="Black". "Black" only in a social economic term. The idea is that all Africans have been oppressed by some foreign force. My opinion is that if your from Africa you are a "brotha".