Added: 4 years ago
From: LennyBound
Views: 5,809
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LennyBound, thank you for the trouble of the upload. UCSD certainly has a gifted Neuroscientificpsychophilosoph­ic faculty: Churchland, Ramachandran, and they also have Akiskal who, though less public, has been at the forefront of the study of effects of psychotropic drugs on neuropsychiatric,psychological­, and behavioural processes. His research helped save my life. With the number of persons downing psychotropics like candy these fields of study will become more and more important.

  • nothing she says is absurd.

    human thought and logic are products of the brain as it interacts with the environment.

    what is the problem?

    do we need to posit a supernatural mind other than the brain in order for life to have meaning or persons to have depth?

  • @JAYDUBYAH29

    I think the problem is that Churchland and other naturalist often end up saying that human thoughts and logic are equal to neurological processes. There is a difference between saying that human thought and logic are products of brain activity and saying that they are equal.

  • recognizing the progress of neuroscience and what it tells us takes nothing away from our humanity or the wonder of the natural world.... it also only deepens a spirituality that is about being in relationship to truth.

  • Comment removed

  • Could you clarify what you mean when you say "her view reduces human thought and logic to total absurdity"?

  • @LennyBound

    This individual is simply revealing the limit of his/her intellect. Which may never the less be above his/her peers.

  • @ArtsyPhilosophyGuy That's nice. Perhaps you would like to offer an argument?

  • @ArtsyPhilosophyGuy to live is absurdity my friend...a self-proclaimed philosopher such as yourself should recognize that with relative ease

  • I have so much respect for this lady-

  • Meat can't reason? So how do you explain G.W. Bush?

  • W was a pile of meat and he couldn't reason. I don't see the contradiction.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more