I think Danny is 90% right in here, although they didn't show him the video, where you can see the basement explosions ( blowing the core support ), it's filmed from a distance and you can clearly see the camera shake, earthquake like... then 10 to 11 seconds later the top comes down. So I believe the planes where real ( maybe controlled like drones..., but with real passengers ), but the core was blown, to make it look like the planes did it, cause everybody was paying attention to the top....
Anyone supporting truthers claims are replied with no thanks I don't want to believe that person because they're wrong. And can't explain why with their own words.
But anyone supporting debuggers claims are special and must be respected by all or they are nutty. LoL
Please!! Obviously many professionals don't agree with each other, And the ones chosen to speak for NIST was obvious supporters of failure & not CD. All based on a rushed report.
The ones we hear now have taken time to know truth.
@911SanityandRespect Just because you refuse to believe or understand or see the who's where's & whys doesn't mean you can blame people who don't even know who Osama is for this day.
How do you kill people who don't support this agenda and wears the same clothes as the accused. 19hijackers from 2 other countries all together.
Back off of me, cause we'll just fight, I don't believe the official story & you can't change that with appointed lies & name calling.
This was not a normal CD job. It had to look like failure from the impacts. So NOTHING traditional was seen, But plenty of it was heard.
Many people heard bombs going off & even reported so on tape including fire fighters.
But as long as the choice to hear by debuggers support this crime by failure they can be heard with no bashing.
But let someone prove & show this was a CD job & not by failure, they are personally bashed & liars drunks & non credible & they cry like babies about it.
@Snowman374th People said it SOUNDED like bombs. That doesn't make it bombs. The fireman said something to the effect of 'i could hear a boom boom boom...like a bomb'. Well, that doesn't mean it was a bomb. Just that (the collapsing of the buildings) sounded like bombs going off. The pancaking of the floors would make a very loud sound, probably much like a bomb going off.
@911SanityandRespect So I hear your OPINION now, AND THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT NOT A BOMB.
Debuggers make too many excuses. All they have is an official report with holes everywhere in it. fake passports, 2 planes, Pull it, And a lot of lies.
And I for one care what J.V. has to say. I feel the same way he does. You people are a joke. don't bother name bashing me, I've heard em all before, there stupid, your experts are not experts. So what about J.V.
Debunkers? Does THIS answer YOU using a dead-man's simple lack of knowledge about "alternative new methods" to make him look like a fool, and to use his courage to admit that YES ...WTC7 WAS a VERY STANDARD CD ?
@HomerbearReloaded Who is attempting to make him look like a fool? Stop making shit up.
Jowenko gave his opinion, without much evidence, that WTC could have been a CD. He didn't research it himself. Someone gave him some info and a bad copy of loose change and asked his opinion. He didn't run around saying 'it was an inside job'. Truthers manipulated what he said, and dragged his name through the mud of the 'truth movement'.
Danny Jowenko was not a truther. Have some respect.
@911SanityandRespect All ur FACTS are based on the testimony of DEAD experts like John O'neil.
It doesn't take an expert to demonstr8 Newton's third law of physics. Repeatable EVERYTIME. The images of 175 DO NOT COMPLY, ergo they are IMAGES. Tech is 10yr getting out, we have 3D TV. Experts like seismologist show p-waves NASA shows thermal sat photos.
@cheerdiver Is it hard to make absolutely no sense whatsoever?
What do 3D TV's have to do with Muslim extremists hijacking planes and attacking the US? Why do you bring up Newton's 3rd law of physics?
I wouldn't have, because Newton and his 3rd law laughs at chuckleheads like you who regurgitate incoherent statements over and over again, while not even understanding what they are saying.
@911SanityandRespect "who regurgitate incoherent statements over and over again, while not even understanding what they are saying."
You nailed it, That's a debugger through and through.
Why in the fuck would a country barely able to feed itself attack a country who has everything. No Muslim extremist done shit. This was over oil drugs & money.
No matter how many excuses you come up with or lame facts to give, you can never change that fact, And we Americans know it now.
'Giraffes have LONG NECKS, lasers shot from sat's. GOV LIES. What about that guy who said that thing???? ALL THE EVIDENCE IS FAKE. We have digital blenders now. OPEN YOUR EYES.'
See, that doesn't make any goddamn sense. That is how you (and a lot of truthers) come across. Unintelligible and confused, yet in complete belief that what you say is right.
@HomerbearReloaded Who is attempting to make him look like a fool? Stop making shit up.
Jowenko gave his opinion, without much evidence, that WTC could have been a CD. He didn't research it himself. Someone gave him some info and a bad copy of loose change and asked his opinion. He didn't run around saying 'it was an inside job'. Truthers manipulated what he said, and dragged his name through the mud of the 'truth movement'.
Danny Jowenko was not a truther. Have some respect.
I did remove the (dot) and insert a . . It doesn't work. Send the links to me by PM.
Fission? Really? Star Wars laser guns? Dr. Judy Wood? Ya? Well, I think Dr. Judy is right about a few things.....but I've dismissed the laser gun on the World Trade Centers. It simply appears to me that they collapsed just like NIST suggests and due to a weak design. WTC 7 still has me scratching my head however. Lots of 911 events do.
@1971SuperLead Check out this guy, RKOwens. He has done amazing work on debunking most, if not all the 911 conspiracy theories. He is in my favorites.
The important thing to remember about this collapse was that it was not the steel beams that failed. It was the bolts and fasters that held the floors to the beams that were the failing devices. The Twin Towers were actually a bad design. No building built prior to these are built where the floors are needed to hold the beam structure in place.
@cheerdiver Your link does not work, and don't be so sure that I'm the one who is clueless.
Abolhassan Astaneh, Engineering Professor at University of California in Berkley, did a five-year study of the collapse of the Twin Towers. He had access to the architecture plans only days after the event. After reviewing the plans his conclusion was, "A better design likely would have prevented many of the nearly 3,000 deaths that day."
@1971SuperLead hey clueless, u have to replace the (dot) w/ a . or it won't work. This was an insurance scam, and morons like u fell hook line and sinker. Show me an upclose vid of a SOLID object (767) colliding w/ either tower. It DOESN"T EXIST!!
Fission created these BLAST RADII: loc(dot)gov/exhibits/911/images/lg-map-therm1(dot)jpg
Structural failure would only create a PARTIAL collapse.
@911SanityandRespect And yet I can back it up w/ evidence and FACT. What do u back ur statements w/ derogatory diatribe. Just goes to show who is on the correct side of the LAWS OF PHYSICS.!.
@cheerdiver You don't have evidence or facts. Just another truther that would rather live in a paranoid delusional bubble then believe that angry radical Muslims attacked the U.S on 9/11.
You are right with one thing. The FED GOV has screwed you, but not in any secret 9/11 conspiracy with lasers and explosives.
Why not fight the gov on real things? Like unemployment, wall street, infrastructure, health care...
Flaming on about 9/11 is what the GOV wants you to do. The NWO thanks you!
@cheerdiver Nice JFK quote on your youtube channel...
"Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."
LOL. That sums up the entire 9/11 truth movement!!! All you have are myths and conspiracy theories, which allows you to have opinions without critical thinking.
@911SanityandRespect The myth believer refers to ppl like urself. Tell us, how many books have u read on the subject? U claim to care so much. Or do u even know how to read a book, and get all ur info from the bought and paid for media?
u have yet to make the 1st point or even support why ur right.
gov employees are required to lie.
So why is there no accident report for any aircraft on the NTSB accident summation page?
u don't even know where the gov claims to get their info.
@cheerdiver LOL was I supposed to make the first point? Why is it up to me to prove to you that I am right?
It is up to you and the rest of the 'truth movement' to produce YOUR facts. My side already has facts that have been checked and proven by experts and reviewed by peers. You just choose to dismiss them all as lies.
While on the other hand, the 'truth movement' does not have facts. They have opinions and theories, both of which are fine to have but ARE NOT TRUTH.
@ella5024 Whoa. I am being mean? You just told me to get castrated. That seems mean.
All I did was suggest you see a doctor, because it isn't normal to think holographic planes and birds are following you. I was seriously trying to help.
@911SanityandRespect See an eye doctor, and ask her to check your vision, because you can't see the difference between a dark grey military jet, and commercial jet.
@ella5024 And you can? And anyways, you said the planes were not real. You said they were holograms.
Now why would the military goto all the trouble of making fake holographic planes and make them look like military jets? Wouldn't that be the dumbest mistake in the world?
If the story is that commercial jets hit the buildings, then they would make sure the made the right holograms.
@911SanityandRespect I know because I know, that's all. They had help, but....oh well you would never believe it anyway because you can't even see a dark grey jet.
@911SanityandRespect You want to know for the reason of discrediting me, then? I don't have to prove anything to you. I'm not in the business of proving anything to anyone. I told you what I know out of the goodness of my heart, because I am an honest person. Going any further than that would endanger too many lives. I don't find any sanity, or respect in your perspective, because I know that your story is wrong. I'm done with this conversation. The rabbit hole is yours to discover on your own.
I think Danny is 90% right in here, although they didn't show him the video, where you can see the basement explosions ( blowing the core support ), it's filmed from a distance and you can clearly see the camera shake, earthquake like... then 10 to 11 seconds later the top comes down. So I believe the planes where real ( maybe controlled like drones..., but with real passengers ), but the core was blown, to make it look like the planes did it, cause everybody was paying attention to the top....
barthoedemaker 5 days ago
Anyone supporting truthers claims are replied with no thanks I don't want to believe that person because they're wrong. And can't explain why with their own words.
But anyone supporting debuggers claims are special and must be respected by all or they are nutty. LoL
Please!! Obviously many professionals don't agree with each other, And the ones chosen to speak for NIST was obvious supporters of failure & not CD. All based on a rushed report.
The ones we hear now have taken time to know truth.
Snowman374th 4 months ago
@Snowman374th If truthers had actual facts, not just theories, maybe they would be taken seriously. But they don't have proof.
911SanityandRespect 3 months ago
@911SanityandRespect Just because you refuse to believe or understand or see the who's where's & whys doesn't mean you can blame people who don't even know who Osama is for this day.
How do you kill people who don't support this agenda and wears the same clothes as the accused. 19hijackers from 2 other countries all together.
Back off of me, cause we'll just fight, I don't believe the official story & you can't change that with appointed lies & name calling.
Snowman374th 3 months ago
@Snowman374th Back off you? This is my house silly...you came here to post and make no sense. I can't help but point that out.
Go move to Mexico with your bff J.V.
911SanityandRespect 3 months ago
This was not a normal CD job. It had to look like failure from the impacts. So NOTHING traditional was seen, But plenty of it was heard.
Many people heard bombs going off & even reported so on tape including fire fighters.
But as long as the choice to hear by debuggers support this crime by failure they can be heard with no bashing.
But let someone prove & show this was a CD job & not by failure, they are personally bashed & liars drunks & non credible & they cry like babies about it.
Snowman374th 4 months ago
@Snowman374th People said it SOUNDED like bombs. That doesn't make it bombs. The fireman said something to the effect of 'i could hear a boom boom boom...like a bomb'. Well, that doesn't mean it was a bomb. Just that (the collapsing of the buildings) sounded like bombs going off. The pancaking of the floors would make a very loud sound, probably much like a bomb going off.
911SanityandRespect 3 months ago
see Dr JUDY WOOD
The Buldings were Turned to "DUST", 24 Large Holes were left, Truck loads of Dirt were standing by to come in and fill up the 24 Large Holes
Jesse Ventura beleives Weapons like HAARP was used
Only 20% of the MASS of the Buildings was left to Haul Away
deadadelta 4 months ago
@deadadelta I already know about Dr. Judy Wood. Thanks, but no thanks. My mind lives in reality.
Well, there was a lot of dust. But there were also lots of big chunks of the building left. It was not just dust...that is just batshit insane.
Who really cares what Jesse Ventura believes? What exactly is he an expert on?
911SanityandRespect 4 months ago
@911SanityandRespect So I hear your OPINION now, AND THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT NOT A BOMB.
Debuggers make too many excuses. All they have is an official report with holes everywhere in it. fake passports, 2 planes, Pull it, And a lot of lies.
And I for one care what J.V. has to say. I feel the same way he does. You people are a joke. don't bother name bashing me, I've heard em all before, there stupid, your experts are not experts. So what about J.V.
Stop making excuses for they're agenda.
Snowman374th 3 months ago
@Snowman374th What excuses have I made?
Please tell me which experts are not 'experts', and why they are not.
I won't bash you. I will call you on your bullshite though. You can call it bashing if you want.
911SanityandRespect 3 months ago
@911SanityandRespect Both sides are definitely separated on this subject.
H-e-y-L-o-o-o-k! It's.....
A&E9/11 for truth!!!
You don't like them! You will talk them down! You will.! say thing's & They will.! prove wrong...You will be mad.!
But YOU! won't prove them to be wrong.
HOLES, plenty of 'em.
Snowman374th 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Danny Jowenko's business went bad, he was nearly broke and drank a lot.
The man was desperate for some attention.
Later he crashed a tree.
koertje 5 months ago
Debunkers? Does THIS answer YOU using a dead-man's simple lack of knowledge about "alternative new methods" to make him look like a fool, and to use his courage to admit that YES ...WTC7 WAS a VERY STANDARD CD ?
to attempt to make him look like a fool?
/watch?v=XSf-ZcPCpqs
RIP DannyJawenko
HomerbearReloaded 5 months ago
@HomerbearReloaded Who is attempting to make him look like a fool? Stop making shit up.
Jowenko gave his opinion, without much evidence, that WTC could have been a CD. He didn't research it himself. Someone gave him some info and a bad copy of loose change and asked his opinion. He didn't run around saying 'it was an inside job'. Truthers manipulated what he said, and dragged his name through the mud of the 'truth movement'.
Danny Jowenko was not a truther. Have some respect.
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
@911SanityandRespect All ur FACTS are based on the testimony of DEAD experts like John O'neil.
It doesn't take an expert to demonstr8 Newton's third law of physics. Repeatable EVERYTIME. The images of 175 DO NOT COMPLY, ergo they are IMAGES. Tech is 10yr getting out, we have 3D TV. Experts like seismologist show p-waves NASA shows thermal sat photos.
YOUR EVIDENCE doesn't stand up to REALITY.
cheerdiver 5 months ago
@cheerdiver Is it hard to make absolutely no sense whatsoever?
What do 3D TV's have to do with Muslim extremists hijacking planes and attacking the US? Why do you bring up Newton's 3rd law of physics?
I wouldn't have, because Newton and his 3rd law laughs at chuckleheads like you who regurgitate incoherent statements over and over again, while not even understanding what they are saying.
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
@911SanityandRespect "who regurgitate incoherent statements over and over again, while not even understanding what they are saying."
You nailed it, That's a debugger through and through.
Why in the fuck would a country barely able to feed itself attack a country who has everything. No Muslim extremist done shit. This was over oil drugs & money.
No matter how many excuses you come up with or lame facts to give, you can never change that fact, And we Americans know it now.
And we're not happy.
Snowman374th 3 months ago
@Snowman374th LOL what country attacked the US? And since when did the US have everything...
Back in your bubble!
911SanityandRespect 3 months ago
@cheerdiver Here is what you read like:
'Giraffes have LONG NECKS, lasers shot from sat's. GOV LIES. What about that guy who said that thing???? ALL THE EVIDENCE IS FAKE. We have digital blenders now. OPEN YOUR EYES.'
See, that doesn't make any goddamn sense. That is how you (and a lot of truthers) come across. Unintelligible and confused, yet in complete belief that what you say is right.
Keep it up, it is good for the lawls.
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
@HomerbearReloaded Who is attempting to make him look like a fool? Stop making shit up.
Jowenko gave his opinion, without much evidence, that WTC could have been a CD. He didn't research it himself. Someone gave him some info and a bad copy of loose change and asked his opinion. He didn't run around saying 'it was an inside job'. Truthers manipulated what he said, and dragged his name through the mud of the 'truth movement'.
Danny Jowenko was not a truther. Have some respect.
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
@HomerbearReloaded Oh, and if you loved Danny so much, spell his fucking name right.
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
I did remove the (dot) and insert a . . It doesn't work. Send the links to me by PM.
Fission? Really? Star Wars laser guns? Dr. Judy Wood? Ya? Well, I think Dr. Judy is right about a few things.....but I've dismissed the laser gun on the World Trade Centers. It simply appears to me that they collapsed just like NIST suggests and due to a weak design. WTC 7 still has me scratching my head however. Lots of 911 events do.
1971SuperLead 5 months ago
@1971SuperLead Check out this guy, RKOwens. He has done amazing work on debunking most, if not all the 911 conspiracy theories. He is in my favorites.
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
@911SanityandRespect Ya, RK gave up along time ago. He won't respond to any comments.
about 2yr now.
cheerdiver 5 months ago
Comment removed
paranorma1palace 5 months ago
@paranorma1palace LOL it was interesting...too bad she removed a lot of her comments. I was smart and got screenshots befroe she did, though.
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
The important thing to remember about this collapse was that it was not the steel beams that failed. It was the bolts and fasters that held the floors to the beams that were the failing devices. The Twin Towers were actually a bad design. No building built prior to these are built where the floors are needed to hold the beam structure in place.
1971SuperLead 5 months ago
@1971SuperLead Dimitri Khalezove explains it all for those who don't have a clue.
And you seem to be quite clueless.
<2K died: nydailynews(dot)com/ny_local/2011/08/24/2011-08-24_id_remains_of_wtc_worker_10_yrs_later.html
It's called a super structure for a reason.
cheerdiver 5 months ago
@cheerdiver Your link does not work, and don't be so sure that I'm the one who is clueless.
Abolhassan Astaneh, Engineering Professor at University of California in Berkley, did a five-year study of the collapse of the Twin Towers. He had access to the architecture plans only days after the event. After reviewing the plans his conclusion was, "A better design likely would have prevented many of the nearly 3,000 deaths that day."
I suppose he is clueless too? Who are you? God?
1971SuperLead 5 months ago
@1971SuperLead hey clueless, u have to replace the (dot) w/ a . or it won't work. This was an insurance scam, and morons like u fell hook line and sinker. Show me an upclose vid of a SOLID object (767) colliding w/ either tower. It DOESN"T EXIST!!
Fission created these BLAST RADII: loc(dot)gov/exhibits/911/images/lg-map-therm1(dot)jpg
Structural failure would only create a PARTIAL collapse.
WAKE UP, THE FED GOV HAS SCREWED U ROYAL.
pay attention
cheerdiver 5 months ago
@cheerdiver You're a looney.
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
@911SanityandRespect And yet I can back it up w/ evidence and FACT. What do u back ur statements w/ derogatory diatribe. Just goes to show who is on the correct side of the LAWS OF PHYSICS.!.
cheerdiver 5 months ago
@cheerdiver You don't have evidence or facts. Just another truther that would rather live in a paranoid delusional bubble then believe that angry radical Muslims attacked the U.S on 9/11.
You are right with one thing. The FED GOV has screwed you, but not in any secret 9/11 conspiracy with lasers and explosives.
Why not fight the gov on real things? Like unemployment, wall street, infrastructure, health care...
Flaming on about 9/11 is what the GOV wants you to do. The NWO thanks you!
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
@911SanityandRespect It doesn't conform to the LAWS OF PHYSICS. The proof is in front of ur eyes, yet u refuse to acknowledge it.
Radical extremest only exist in the elite and ur brainwashed mind.
People who join the military have no choice, but to conform the gov opinion. Sad little sacks of crap they are, traitors to my country.!.
cheerdiver 5 months ago
@cheerdiver LOL.
You don't conform to the LAWS OF SANITY. The proof is in front of your eyes, yet you refuse to acknowledge it.
What proof do you have that radical extremism only exists in the elite? What does that even mean?
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
@cheerdiver Nice JFK quote on your youtube channel...
"Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."
LOL. That sums up the entire 9/11 truth movement!!! All you have are myths and conspiracy theories, which allows you to have opinions without critical thinking.
Thank you!
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
@911SanityandRespect The myth believer refers to ppl like urself. Tell us, how many books have u read on the subject? U claim to care so much. Or do u even know how to read a book, and get all ur info from the bought and paid for media?
u have yet to make the 1st point or even support why ur right.
gov employees are required to lie.
So why is there no accident report for any aircraft on the NTSB accident summation page?
u don't even know where the gov claims to get their info.
cheerdiver 5 months ago
@cheerdiver LOL was I supposed to make the first point? Why is it up to me to prove to you that I am right?
It is up to you and the rest of the 'truth movement' to produce YOUR facts. My side already has facts that have been checked and proven by experts and reviewed by peers. You just choose to dismiss them all as lies.
While on the other hand, the 'truth movement' does not have facts. They have opinions and theories, both of which are fine to have but ARE NOT TRUTH.
911SanityandRespect 5 months ago
this demolition guy pretty well says it all.
I don't know how much of the building was welded & how much was bolted so his expertise is sound to me.
OugaBoogaShockwave 5 months ago
Comment removed
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 What does that even mean?
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
Comment removed
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 Probably because it was a commercial jet, full of real people.
Energy weapons? Hologram planes? Please explain.
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
Comment removed
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 You can't assure me, because you don't have any substantiated proof. Saying it was lasers and holograms is not substantiated proof.
I have looked at the planes many times. They are real. So were the people.
Are you sure that you couldn't make phone calls from the air in 2001? Watch this.
watch?v=Z96MZOZyilo
And I assume that you don't think the Pentagon was hit by a plane either? Watch this.
watch?v=t1wQ2BJsgx0
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
Comment removed
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 If you are seeing holographic planes everyday, you should go see a doctor. There are no holographic planes. You need medical attention.
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
Comment removed
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 Ok, I watched some of your videos.
I recommend you see a doctor even more now. There are no holographic birds or planes. No plasma orbs.
You really should get some professional help.
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
Comment removed
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 Why are you removing all your comments?
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
@911SanityandRespect Because you are being mean. Maybe castration would be an option, I would recommend it.
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 Whoa. I am being mean? You just told me to get castrated. That seems mean.
All I did was suggest you see a doctor, because it isn't normal to think holographic planes and birds are following you. I was seriously trying to help.
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
@911SanityandRespect I recommend YOU see a doctor.
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 For what reason?
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
@911SanityandRespect See an eye doctor, and ask her to check your vision, because you can't see the difference between a dark grey military jet, and commercial jet.
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 And you can? And anyways, you said the planes were not real. You said they were holograms.
Now why would the military goto all the trouble of making fake holographic planes and make them look like military jets? Wouldn't that be the dumbest mistake in the world?
If the story is that commercial jets hit the buildings, then they would make sure the made the right holograms.
See how all this makes absolutely no sense?
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
@911SanityandRespect The military didn't do it, Iraq did it.
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 Iraq is responsible for 9/11? They made the holograms and faked all the evidence? How do you know Iraq was responsible?
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
@911SanityandRespect I know because I know, that's all. They had help, but....oh well you would never believe it anyway because you can't even see a dark grey jet.
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 Well, if you had some actual proof I might believe you.
Where are you getting all this information about Iraq being involved?
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
@911SanityandRespect You don't want to know that, trust me.
ella5024 7 months ago
@ella5024 I do want to know. Because so far it seems like you have no real, fact based evidence.
'I know because I know, that's all." Is not proof in any way.
911SanityandRespect 7 months ago
@911SanityandRespect You want to know for the reason of discrediting me, then? I don't have to prove anything to you. I'm not in the business of proving anything to anyone. I told you what I know out of the goodness of my heart, because I am an honest person. Going any further than that would endanger too many lives. I don't find any sanity, or respect in your perspective, because I know that your story is wrong. I'm done with this conversation. The rabbit hole is yours to discover on your own.
ella5024 7 months ago