@lighthouscolor He most likely new and it wouldn't of mattered if he feathered them or not its a 3 blade prop which means this is going to be no avoiding the prop from touching the ground which automatically means over haul of the engines and with no nose gear they were likely going to slam down on them if they were stopped any way and worst scenario he still needs to go around and now he's got feathered props if he can afford that plane he can afford new engines so why bother
@lighthouscolor He did. If you watch closely the engines were shut down after the mainwheels touched the ground. Shutting them down on final would have been very unsafe. This was the most "crash" landing I've ever seen
@99sammysosa Wait, a minute! In a way it is part of your plane. Your tax money that you involuntary donated to Uncle Sam bought and paid for that plane. It is like you donating a some of money to a company and that company buys a new car. Technically, you have part ownership to that car. Right?! So, Yes, you should be pissed for the Army to F@%$ up your plane!
not to sound like a know it all but that is not a 200 series, a 200 has a T-tail.. that is a C-90...we have one at the school i am attending for Aircraft Maintainance
Probably knew something was wrong, because pilot kept nose off for unusually long time. Probably figured have to land one way or another. Glad nobody hurt.
@indianmalujl He killed the engines so that they were not shock loaded..... Shock loaded engines cost LOTS of money to put right..... Pilot did a textbook landing and made it look easy.... Respect!!!!!
the aircraft more stable and would have reduced the risk of structural dammage to the nose section. Overall though the pilot did a good job keeping things under control during this emergency landing.
runway you on have to send the engine in for a light overhaul and the internal components do suffer the same stresses as an engine under power. As far as the landing goes it is a judgement call that has to be made by the pilot as he/she is ultimately responsible for the aircraft, however with this type of aircraft it is better to land gear up since the main wheels do not fully retract into the wheel well and the aircraft would still ride on them upon landing. Landing gear up would have made
This is not a King Air B200 or a King Air C-90 it is a King Air A65-90 or U-21 as the Army called them. It was the first version of King Air aircraft built by Beechcraft and was designed and built for the Army. The reason for shutting down the engines is purely for financial reasons, if the engine is running when the prop strikes the ground a complete overhaul is required and many components will be stressed and require replacement if the engine is shut down prior to the props striking the
@esdenaze no cause now you have the main landing gears for differential braking, you have more control. in the case you have a gear unsafe light on one of the main gears, id say lets think about gear up landing but this was the way its supposed to be done. look sometimes,.. many times the gear unsafe light is just a false warning,.. and you go ahead do a belly landing,
why did they feather the prop? wouldn't leaving the prop in a low pitch at a low RPM help slow it down more? like like shifting a car into a lower gear...
@Cravin9741 : So the props stop spinning quickly. You wouldn't want the props spinning when then struck the ground. The torque would cause some violent issues.
@Cravin9741 I don't think you want to slow it down more. You want enough speed so your elevator has enough authority to hold the nose up until it's gets too slow and the nose drop down smoothly.
@eddogbreath To lose some extra speed and to give the plane a little extra room to dive the moment he turns off the engines. Just my veteran FSX pilot opinion. :P
He cut the power at 0:14. He pulled back on the controls too much though. That could have been avoided, but under pressure you can't really remember those things...unless you have thousands of hours under your belt.
10/10 for life n min damage..but i think the pilot could've held the nose up a lilo more and place it gradually on ground to be more on the safer side.
Good landing. Pilots should have feathered and cut the engines just a bit sooner so they wouldn't have ruined them like that. But either way, great job.
@wcolby well thats not too thin of air, remember although the standard adiabatic lapse rate is2 degrees C and 1 inch of Hg per 1,000 feet, not everyday is standard day, but it was still a damn nice landing, this is just another reason to nail those soft field multi-engine landings I have been doing so much of
A King Air C-90 and a King Air 200 are two different models of airplane. A King Air 200 is much larger with a T-tail and tandem wheels on the main landing gear. This is probably a U-21 which is a military version of the C-90.
really wasnt bad of a crash at all given the circumstrances.hydraulic loss of MLG, failure to lock over center. definetly requiring engine overhauls, sheet metal replacement, props,etc
Textbook landing. Crew feathers props just before they hit. For the guy that was asking why the crew pulled the nose up like they did.. it's to bleed off as much speed as possible before impact. The chances of survival go up exponentially with every knot of groundspeed bled off.
Nice handling of the situation. I dont know, if the shut down the engines before prop earth contact. But they did a very good and professional landing. Did you see, how relaxed they sit inside until braking with the nose? I would have a brown strip in my shorts!
I had the same exact thing happen while landing a C-90 (without the extra wheelie just before letting the nose down). The most surprising effect of the experience was the deceleration (242' skid on the nose with minimal damage). The only injury was a 320 lb. medic twisting his ankle jumping off the aft stair.
The issue was that nose gear was never in the locked position in the first place. Read the OP - 2 lights, not three. Why do you think they were taping this? It's not SOP to tape every landing - only those which may pose a problem.
the pilot never brought the power completely to idle thats why the plane kept the nose up attitude, then what he did to compensate for that is he brought the nose down too sharply breaking the nose gear lock and thus crashin.
To Mechanically turn the propellers so they are thin side to the air flow, or not spinning in the wind.. It hurts the engine less if the propellers aren't turning when they hit the runway.
@wcolby To me it looks like the yoke was pulled back simply to keep the nose off the dirt for as long as possiable. Less time in contact with the ground = less damage. I think he timed feathering the props well, as they stopped just as the nose hit.
@wcolby These propellers cannot be "mechanically turned". The PT-6 turboprop engine propellers are turned by turbine airflow. The pilot shut off the engines (stopped fuel to the turbines), but there was no way to ensure that the props would end up in that position rotation-wise. He could have feathered them (knife-edge into the wind). He did a superb job in keeping the nose up for as long as he did, and also in keeping the plane straight down the runway before the nose gear collapsed.
You need to look closer!!, the pilot new there was a problem with the nose wheel, check the first few seconds and you can see the excess movement in the wheel. The pilot was trying to keep the nose off as long as possible to allow the speed to bleed off so the impact was less drammatic. Shame they couldnt pull the engines and save 2 expensive teardowns but great work by the crew
PT-6 is a free wheel turbine so there is no internal destruction like you would see with an opposed piston or radial engine. I'd be looking at the prop flange, hub's and engine mounts pretty closely. Also, props slicing into runway tend to frag cabin area. Uncle Sam can rebuild her!
In a complex prop airplane to feather means to reverse the pitch of the propellers.This causes the prop to push airflow in the opposite direction and dramatically reduces stopping distance when a short landing is required.
Damn fast shut down and feathering the props before nose down. Nice.
21stOPFOR 1 week ago
typical senior behaviour, jump in line in front of everyone , then take forever to get off the bus... meh!!
YoLninYo 1 month ago
Nicely done.
joedlang 1 month ago
Ace Ventura landed it...LIKE A GLOVE!
theokonstantinidis 2 months ago
This is nothing compared to the iran air flight
Aidino123 2 months ago
Did the pilot know the nose gear was not locked? If so he could have saved a lot of damage to the plane by stopping the engines on final approach.
lighthouscolor 3 months ago
@lighthouscolor He most likely new and it wouldn't of mattered if he feathered them or not its a 3 blade prop which means this is going to be no avoiding the prop from touching the ground which automatically means over haul of the engines and with no nose gear they were likely going to slam down on them if they were stopped any way and worst scenario he still needs to go around and now he's got feathered props if he can afford that plane he can afford new engines so why bother
SkatingIsMyWayOfLife 2 months ago
@SkatingIsMyWayOfLife
Have you ever heard of something called grammar?
Ever notice how some people drop periods and commas and
capitalize the first word of something called a "sentence"?
eaterofclams 2 months ago
@lighthouscolor He did. If you watch closely the engines were shut down after the mainwheels touched the ground. Shutting them down on final would have been very unsafe. This was the most "crash" landing I've ever seen
flynmid 1 month ago
"Whahappon?"
"I taughta u gonna lowerda landingear"
"No I taughta u gonna lowerda laningear!"
"Sheee"
bg11215 3 months ago
pro
cars675 3 months ago
was that some sort of russian spy in that plane, protected by nato agents, so he could infiltrate the FBI ? I know all your plans big man
Sven2Perroy 3 months ago
So, what was the problem?
Michael55443 3 months ago
JAARS,org
garyshouse305 4 months ago
Nothing bad about that. He was doing tests for the new Brembo brakes!
johnnyboy3600 4 months ago
*pilot puts his glasses on at the end, LIKE A BOSS hehe
Hummermaniac1 4 months ago 17
@Hummermaniac1 That's Horatio from CSI Miami !
pablof59 3 months ago
Well done
danlilley2000 4 months ago
ofc the army would have broken planes, its the army.
caseychaos3601 4 months ago
"we're here!"
fsx767 5 months ago
thats definitely one way to stop
usernameavailable152 5 months ago
It's going to require a little extra power to taxi.
chazflyz 5 months ago
expensive brakes.
likmahchoda 5 months ago
A couple of propellers is a fair price to pay for saving lives.
MrRonnieG 6 months ago
Thanks everyone for flying Tree Top Airlines..Have a great day!!
UFOSPACE1999 6 months ago
Welcome to Reno and thank you for traveling with us! We hope that you will consider us the next time you are traveling! Thank you again.
captainmorgan757 6 months ago
masterful piloting! notice he keeps the nose up and cuts the engines at the last second. hats off, aircrew!
islandtech63 7 months ago
NAVY!
Levo909 7 months ago
i like how the second pilot jumps out, helps the passenger and claps hes hand like ...yyyhaaa we did it!!! YES SIR YOU MADE A GREAT JOB!
Swissman81 7 months ago
wow just 2 destroyed props and some scratches :)
xam107 7 months ago
Theres nothing better anyone anywhere could have ever done. Good one. I hope that if i ever have a hydraulics failure i can do what this guy did.
DreamVikings 7 months ago
Nice job !
Alexvideoclip 7 months ago
if that was my plane i would be pissed!
99sammysosa 8 months ago
@99sammysosa Wait, a minute! In a way it is part of your plane. Your tax money that you involuntary donated to Uncle Sam bought and paid for that plane. It is like you donating a some of money to a company and that company buys a new car. Technically, you have part ownership to that car. Right?! So, Yes, you should be pissed for the Army to F@%$ up your plane!
itsmonti1 6 months ago
@itsmonti1 Yeah, because the PIC caused that nose gear failure purposefully for shits and giggles, right?
MiG21bisFishbedL 5 months ago
they looked relaxed
dowww21 8 months ago
Chuck Norris was the pilot of that exact plane...
GoneViralProductions 9 months ago 5
porque o piloto nao estoura a cauda do aviao ao inves de destruir o bico as helices e tudo mais?
CASSIANOCAVARESE1 9 months ago
0:17 bouncing gear
4500intelx 9 months ago
Made in china
yurivw 9 months ago
Do you think those props will hammer straight ?
bermudarailway 9 months ago
LOL
anilakskater 10 months ago
Puts the glasses on LIKE A BOSS.
Transam941 10 months ago
not to sound like a know it all but that is not a 200 series, a 200 has a T-tail.. that is a C-90...we have one at the school i am attending for Aircraft Maintainance
pfcquinn22 10 months ago
0:54 puts his sunglasses on, WIN.
rikin45 10 months ago 2
Probably knew something was wrong, because pilot kept nose off for unusually long time. Probably figured have to land one way or another. Glad nobody hurt.
stevegyro1 10 months ago
@indianmalujl He killed the engines so that they were not shock loaded..... Shock loaded engines cost LOTS of money to put right..... Pilot did a textbook landing and made it look easy.... Respect!!!!!
austerace 10 months ago 2
Sad to see such a beautiful plane take a hit but whatcha gonna do, pilot did a good job.
crockett616 10 months ago
the aircraft more stable and would have reduced the risk of structural dammage to the nose section. Overall though the pilot did a good job keeping things under control during this emergency landing.
kwaiboysucks 11 months ago
runway you on have to send the engine in for a light overhaul and the internal components do suffer the same stresses as an engine under power. As far as the landing goes it is a judgement call that has to be made by the pilot as he/she is ultimately responsible for the aircraft, however with this type of aircraft it is better to land gear up since the main wheels do not fully retract into the wheel well and the aircraft would still ride on them upon landing. Landing gear up would have made
kwaiboysucks 11 months ago
This is not a King Air B200 or a King Air C-90 it is a King Air A65-90 or U-21 as the Army called them. It was the first version of King Air aircraft built by Beechcraft and was designed and built for the Army. The reason for shutting down the engines is purely for financial reasons, if the engine is running when the prop strikes the ground a complete overhaul is required and many components will be stressed and require replacement if the engine is shut down prior to the props striking the
kwaiboysucks 11 months ago
i bet they've never seen the runway THIS close up before :D
jamie190595 11 months ago
@jamie190595 when they walked on it?
10dthompson60 11 months ago
dude ur not driving a motarbike
BIGPAKIBOYSAFFY 11 months ago
Great JOb..
leonardozaramella 11 months ago
This is a c90, not a b200
selgemm 1 year ago
When I was 12, I landed a Beechcraft Bonanza V35B during strong wind and snow fall... That was amazing :)
1Nekit1 1 year ago
@1Nekit1 Who cares, it was on a flight sim.
flattrackmile 1 year ago
@1Nekit1 wow you're so cool dude...you sound just like a pilot!
osterwalder6 11 months ago
you know you got skill when you can do a stoppie in an airplane.
koopi5 1 year ago
Killed the engine, so the props wouldn't go flying everywhere haha.
Indianmalujl 1 year ago
awesome, first of all, after everything's fine, put the sunglasses on :D
EBergJibber 1 year ago
They should make an Air Crash Investigation based on this? :P
SuperEminemBoy 1 year ago
He did a great job keeping that nose up and feathering those props on shutdown. I'd say those engines would be reusable. Awesome flying!
vfrl7r 1 year ago
Awesome job!!
gsxrider24 1 year ago
Sweet. at least my weed delivery should be on time!
TWOLF365 1 year ago
maybe a retarded idea but would it not have been safer/easier to just belly land?
esdenaze 1 year ago
@esdenaze no cause now you have the main landing gears for differential braking, you have more control. in the case you have a gear unsafe light on one of the main gears, id say lets think about gear up landing but this was the way its supposed to be done. look sometimes,.. many times the gear unsafe light is just a false warning,.. and you go ahead do a belly landing,
haitiano1982 1 year ago
@esdenaze nope if you can just put out 1 wheels its allways better that non, wheels is like less damage.
nolifemerc 1 year ago
& that ladies and gentlemen, is why hes a navy pilot
killarneyloners 1 year ago
why did they feather the prop? wouldn't leaving the prop in a low pitch at a low RPM help slow it down more? like like shifting a car into a lower gear...
Cravin9741 1 year ago
@Cravin9741 The pilot has used the "reverse" to help to stop the aircraft.
aless2004 1 year ago
@Cravin9741 : So the props stop spinning quickly. You wouldn't want the props spinning when then struck the ground. The torque would cause some violent issues.
JarvisJesseT 1 year ago
@Cravin9741 I don't think you want to slow it down more. You want enough speed so your elevator has enough authority to hold the nose up until it's gets too slow and the nose drop down smoothly.
jkiang 9 months ago
I love whe the pilot down of the aircraft , and he puts you ray-ban glasses!
capvallejo 1 year ago
Unbelievable demonstration of pilot skill - he definitely earned his paycheck that day.
PatSoCal 1 year ago
best pilot!
8martie 1 year ago
that was a short flight...
PILOTasRAHMAN 1 year ago 2
That plane must have been poorly built. It did'nt even get into the air before it crashed.
TheZa1994 1 year ago
@TheZa1994 Its a landing with failed landing gear not a take off
hariswahedi 1 year ago
Any landing you can walk away from is a good one!
roadracer1593 1 year ago
@Stefano, I'm with you! it was a text book landing, why did he re-flare?
eddogbreath 1 year ago
@eddogbreath To lose some extra speed and to give the plane a little extra room to dive the moment he turns off the engines. Just my veteran FSX pilot opinion. :P
pingpongpung 1 year ago
just another classic way to waste tax-payers' money :)
tarashel 1 year ago
0:40 Hey! wheres the red carpet?!?
DetEJagDe 1 year ago
He cut the power at 0:14. He pulled back on the controls too much though. That could have been avoided, but under pressure you can't really remember those things...unless you have thousands of hours under your belt.
nuclear944 1 year ago
" ...two green lights on the gear , thats cool if you are a tail dragger but being a tricycle landing gear aircraft, its bad. ..."
Love your humor.
Thanks for explaining.
Would like to have seen fire arrive on scene.
robertgift 1 year ago
10/10 for life n min damage..but i think the pilot could've held the nose up a lilo more and place it gradually on ground to be more on the safer side.
stickturn 1 year ago
Good landing. Pilots should have feathered and cut the engines just a bit sooner so they wouldn't have ruined them like that. But either way, great job.
swpilot2494 1 year ago
Just like owebama, tearing up government property.
BPwhistleblower 1 year ago
Awesome skills.. The pilot managed to get everybody safe and without destroying the airplane. Good job
Heinekeem 1 year ago 47
@Heinekeem
All that & he did it in the thin air at about 4500 feet
wcolby 1 year ago 6
@wcolby ey, What is SOP?
:S
FSXpakistan 9 months ago
@FSXpakistan Standard Operating Procedure
wcolby 9 months ago
@wcolby Thanks:)
Good day!
FSXpakistan 9 months ago
@wcolby well thats not too thin of air, remember although the standard adiabatic lapse rate is2 degrees C and 1 inch of Hg per 1,000 feet, not everyday is standard day, but it was still a damn nice landing, this is just another reason to nail those soft field multi-engine landings I have been doing so much of
codzomz 5 months ago
@Heinekeem LMAO
zintoit 1 year ago
@Heinekeem the plane could probobly be fixed from that
warriorxp111 10 months ago
POWERSLIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDE!
Thats a freakin awesome rocker!
Pfahli94 1 year ago
Wow. Absolutely FANTASTIC landing. This man is a piloting genious.
RADIOACTIVEBUNY 1 year ago
impressed how the pilot held the lane
tom201090 1 year ago
Hahahahaha :D
SuperThink13 1 year ago
lol 2012 bloopers!
agentpancakes1 1 year ago
bet the pilots thinking " atleast i dont have to pay for that"
TeenFlyer95 1 year ago
I hope everyone enjoyed their flight on TREE TOP AIRLINES....
UFOSPACE1999 1 year ago
Listen closely, from 0:17 onwards you can hear the pilot scream,
"what the fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu...."
daveescape01 1 year ago
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
i noe its rong rong to do dat but its just funny to me
TEEHEE
liopandah123abc 1 year ago
That looked expensive.
BigJonBone 1 year ago
Any landing you can walk away from . . .
Snipe4261 1 year ago 16
@Snipe4261 Or run/swim away from...
krbosak 6 months ago
good piloting.. he knew the problem and tried to keep it on its back 2 wheels till plane slowed down abit
TkMToM1993 1 year ago
What's that guy at 0:51 doing? Don't ask don't tell?
quentin3434 1 year ago
I kinda think that might be a straight 90 maybe an A or B
Anybody know what happened? It looks like the bicycle chain must have broke.
lasjayhawk 1 year ago
Pilot pulled back the stick to give engines more time to spool down. Looks like minimal damage, beautiful job.
rrip1 1 year ago
A King Air C-90 and a King Air 200 are two different models of airplane. A King Air 200 is much larger with a T-tail and tandem wheels on the main landing gear. This is probably a U-21 which is a military version of the C-90.
nocalsteve 1 year ago
really wasnt bad of a crash at all given the circumstrances.hydraulic loss of MLG, failure to lock over center. definetly requiring engine overhauls, sheet metal replacement, props,etc
badbrains409 1 year ago
if he landed it with a supeer haaaaaaaaaaaard bumb , the gear , was locked
22cibe 1 year ago
hahahhahhaa lol
shahabbangash 1 year ago
Textbook landing. Crew feathers props just before they hit. For the guy that was asking why the crew pulled the nose up like they did.. it's to bleed off as much speed as possible before impact. The chances of survival go up exponentially with every knot of groundspeed bled off.
raysot 1 year ago
and he just walks off thinking he is not going to have to pay for that
invisibleyoyo31 1 year ago
that was a textbook landing under those circumstances.Well done
FISHMUSKIE1 1 year ago
Give that pilot a beer!
frank2398 1 year ago
I wonder if it is better to land with no gear than half gear?
cjellwood 1 year ago
That was a picture perfect way to make the best out of a bad situation. Props to the pilot.
lowball420 1 year ago
He forgot to shut off the engines. That plane is dun.
3624nathan 1 year ago
@3624nathan he clearly shut it down at 0:15
Leticoz 1 year ago
Very good pilot
wolf69a 1 year ago
look at my preferite aircraft!!! no way!!! the pilot is a dork!
accuruneide 1 year ago
@accuruneide dude read the description , the pilot was genius !!
TheoO18 1 year ago
Its a Kingair C90, very nice job by the pilot
txmuddog 1 year ago
pilot did a great job of not hurting anybody 2 thumbs up
Mushkill666 1 year ago
@Mushkill666 Thumbs down.
robert0joe 1 year ago
Text book. Well done Sir. Saved the engines as well.
meccabumbleswan 1 year ago
Good job, you had the gear down then you raised it back up. And FAILED
Kfaypilot 1 year ago
@Kfaypilot
Wow you must be retarded...He didn't raise the gear back up, the front gear didn't lock.
Sting3733 1 year ago
damn, im the only person that disliked this video so far. i mean, im not gonna give a thumbs up to those guys when they got out of the aircraft
Deepthunder11 1 year ago
great job
cutasscrew 1 year ago
yea thats really bad,well everyone was ok so thats good.
MrPaki1996 1 year ago
very well done!
straighttailpilot 1 year ago
Nice Job Pilot!
Jonathanrulze 1 year ago
Nice handling of the situation. I dont know, if the shut down the engines before prop earth contact. But they did a very good and professional landing. Did you see, how relaxed they sit inside until braking with the nose? I would have a brown strip in my shorts!
FreiheitTV 1 year ago
pilot got skill
butterbean444 1 year ago
he should have killed the props first to prevent further damage
VEE1r0tate 1 year ago
@VEE1r0tate
Thats what he did.
RontoWolfBackUp 1 year ago
I had the same exact thing happen while landing a C-90 (without the extra wheelie just before letting the nose down). The most surprising effect of the experience was the deceleration (242' skid on the nose with minimal damage). The only injury was a 320 lb. medic twisting his ankle jumping off the aft stair.
To mention it, this is not a King Air 200.
Iflew727 1 year ago
thats some good piloting skills
skat0r 1 year ago
The issue was that nose gear was never in the locked position in the first place. Read the OP - 2 lights, not three. Why do you think they were taping this? It's not SOP to tape every landing - only those which may pose a problem.
mugaliens 1 year ago
True, its not SOP to tape every landing... But I have a video on Youtube called Airplanes Landing Safely & nobody watches it. :-)
wcolby 1 year ago 13
@wcolby Oh wow I feel bad.
codclanable 9 months ago
@wcolby Hey, What is SOP?
:S
FSXpakistan 9 months ago
TKFlyboy: "the pilot never brought the power completely to idle thats why the plane kept the nose up attitude"
Wrong - The King Air is a turbine, and uses constant speed props - the pitch is altered to achieve the appropriate thrust.
"then what he did to compensate for that is he brought the nose down too sharply breaking the nose gear lock and thus crashin."
Wrong. The nosewheel touchdown velocity was well within limits.
mugaliens 1 year ago
so much for those propellers
kenchen3000 1 year ago
the pilot never brought the power completely to idle thats why the plane kept the nose up attitude, then what he did to compensate for that is he brought the nose down too sharply breaking the nose gear lock and thus crashin.
TKFlyboy 2 years ago
no, the nose ldg didn't lock down when the landing gears were took down, and the pilot had an indication of it in the cockpit.
fincruix 2 years ago 13
a real pilot would of taxied it to the ramp
rkasior 2 years ago
:,(
yz450fWOO 2 years ago
i bet they put themselves in for medals and purple hearts.
jjjazzycraig 2 years ago
Why disable embed? Please, think about it
bachian 2 years ago
Thanks to reconsider! ;-)
bachian 2 years ago
pilot puted his sun glasses back just after he went of the plane :D
coolos123456789 2 years ago 2
its only about a foot jump.. lol
mellebaby1 2 years ago
0:41 "How are we gonna get out?!" XD
captainmattthompson 2 years ago
lol
Cheesepickles22 2 years ago
that is not a B200, but great job by those pilots! those engines are good to go again!
Solberg83 2 years ago
The pilot did a great job, you can't really say he did bad or criticise until it happens to you!
Saberpride73 2 years ago 3
thats gotta hurt
borshn 2 years ago
To Mechanically turn the propellers so they are thin side to the air flow, or not spinning in the wind.. It hurts the engine less if the propellers aren't turning when they hit the runway.
wcolby 2 years ago
@wcolby To me it looks like the yoke was pulled back simply to keep the nose off the dirt for as long as possiable. Less time in contact with the ground = less damage. I think he timed feathering the props well, as they stopped just as the nose hit.
kevgza1 1 year ago
@wcolby Would it matter as much with a turboprop?
LukeWratten 1 year ago
@wcolby These propellers cannot be "mechanically turned". The PT-6 turboprop engine propellers are turned by turbine airflow. The pilot shut off the engines (stopped fuel to the turbines), but there was no way to ensure that the props would end up in that position rotation-wise. He could have feathered them (knife-edge into the wind). He did a superb job in keeping the nose up for as long as he did, and also in keeping the plane straight down the runway before the nose gear collapsed.
tenpiloto 1 year ago
Just managed to feather in time!
ChrizRockster 2 years ago
You need to look closer!!, the pilot new there was a problem with the nose wheel, check the first few seconds and you can see the excess movement in the wheel. The pilot was trying to keep the nose off as long as possible to allow the speed to bleed off so the impact was less drammatic. Shame they couldnt pull the engines and save 2 expensive teardowns but great work by the crew
debiassi 2 years ago
PT-6 is a free wheel turbine so there is no internal destruction like you would see with an opposed piston or radial engine. I'd be looking at the prop flange, hub's and engine mounts pretty closely. Also, props slicing into runway tend to frag cabin area. Uncle Sam can rebuild her!
YakAV8R 2 years ago
In a complex prop airplane to feather means to reverse the pitch of the propellers.This causes the prop to push airflow in the opposite direction and dramatically reduces stopping distance when a short landing is required.
ddrummond87 2 years ago
Hey guys no one died. This was an Army aircraft so that was considered a great landing.
wavefool 2 years ago