The first movie shown in Manila, Philippines is titled "Espectaculo Scientifico" and was shown to moviegoers in Salon Pertierra, Escolta, Manila on January 1, 1897!
fake and edited.... at 0:10 look carefully and observe the individuals to the right and to the left, notice their arms positions, their standing positions, etc.....also notice " Mary Stuart's" position while laying over the stone..... replay from 0:10 as many times as needed, you'll see the cut for yourself.... good video though..
It is not real, it is actually the first piece of film footage to use special effects. This clip uses stop action to create the beheading. (2010 Guinness Book of Records p396)
@4711inside I know my history and when the we were starting to make the first films etc...don't you worry I finished my high school in Europe and its tough school, I was just explaining the video how unreal it looks.. beside I didnt even pay attention at the name of the woman..
You beat me to my comment. As crude as these early films seem it is worth noting the use of film editing to create this "effect". It must have seemed rather realistic and shocking to people of the day.
This was actually the first "film trick" in history. The first manipulation of the camera for optical purposes. In other words the first cinematographic optical illusion! Later came Georges Méliès with his famous "magic tricks" through the cinematographe. Méliès really explored camera tricks!
If you look at the video, there is a cut. You can tell it was a dummy afterwards, and reason is that the dummy looks too stif as if it was made out wood with a dress on.
Hello, it was made in 1895!! Of course it's gonna be fake and of course it's gonna look bad. Bit this and the House of the Devil are the roots of cinematic horror. So stop drooling over whether it looks fake or not. It's a goddamn movie. Idiots.
omg it is fake bc A: look at the way he looked at the camera B: wwhen the executioner cut her head off nad then when he picked it up her hair fell of bc she wore a wig besides at 0:11 look at the way the doll was set up
@itsgiragain We all bow to your amazing intelligence which made you figure out that this is not real, although the descriptions says that it is not real.
First of all,it took actually more than blow to over her head,also she was wearing a wig & when they picked up her head the wig came off & her(she wore a wig cause her hair had become completely Grey)
We all know it is a special effect, in the same way that people in the 2020s will know all our CGI is a special effect. Now either enjoy this first ever horror film or go away. Some of us are trying to appreciate this without getting annoyed by asylum escapees.
*I* know *you* know it was a special effect, dude. That was the joke. I would think that was obvious, Do you think anyone on the internet is so stupid as to truly believe they are informing people of the special effect work involved in the execution of Mary Stuart in *1895*, over three centuries after her death?
Do you believe the people of the internet are such nitwits and ninnies and subscribers of nitcompoopery that-
Wait. Never mind. Carry on, and sorry for the confusion.
@velony in early film days they didnt do a very good job at consistancy they could have at least did two chops and have the wig fall of when the executioner lfted up the head and have the head drop and roll with her dog licking up blood
Looked it up on Wikipedia and this is genuinely 104 years old. It's really creepy despite the fact it's supposed to be an evecution but because of how old it looks.
everyone everyone... this aint a movie o.o..... even on the PRESIDENTS worker youtube channel he has a video of like it and saying its not fake.. uhmm
They didn't "pay" to see it. Only scientists and other high society members involved in the scientific field saw this footage. Edison used it as proof that the celluloid motion capturing device did actually work.
It's a 100yrs ago movie making was just invented!!! What do yo expect? Blood gushing out the neck? Detailed decapitation? know something about filmhistory before you say something about it!
When Maria Stuart died, there was no Film invented...
Never read Schiller???
And I don't mean the fish..
Dumbasses you can see when they changed the person and the waxfigure... right between second 10 and 11 she gets in a different position.
Ok maybe my spelling ain't right all the time because I'm german... but all of you who thought they filmed the death of maria stuart... well let's say you should know that Maria Stuart died 1580 or something like that...
It supposed the public execution by decapitation of Marie Stuart. This mini-film was performed by Edison. Along the history, many profesors says this was a geniune decapitation, but the 00:10/00:11 second makes us all to differ..
may have been the first movie with trained actors i heard,and first horror movie ever made and how was it a horror,i'm not making fun of it but i'm just wondering?
back then this was extremely dramatic. many people believed her head was actually cut off back then. it actually lokked pretty good, but if you lokk extremely hard, youll see there was a split second change into a manneqin.
'I think she's dead.'
'No I'm not!'
munggipossu 18 hours ago
to those saying "fake" as if its a revelation and that this film is depitcing a real beheading.....
.... this horror film was made in 1895..
mary queen of scots was executed on the 8th feb 1587
work it out
excellent special effect for the first time done.
excrutiated 1 week ago
Guys! This was the first known use of special effects in films. So STFU about al this Fake or Real shist!
Indy2Cool 1 week ago
fake
Drew927 2 weeks ago
The first movie shown in Manila, Philippines is titled "Espectaculo Scientifico" and was shown to moviegoers in Salon Pertierra, Escolta, Manila on January 1, 1897!
hamsternice 2 months ago
Anybody know the box office numbers for this film?
squeemu 2 months ago
i thought this was real on first watch
jeffreynolds50 3 months ago 3
Fake
ASB189 4 months ago
whats this the trailer for ?
woodhd 5 months ago
and then hollywood was born and it all went to shit..
theraVen27 5 months ago 10
Too many jump-cuts.
rockyrigby 5 months ago
This reminds me of Monty Python for some odd reason, I think it had something to do with penguins.
rancper 5 months ago
Also the first time actors appeared in a film!!
donlarsen1956 6 months ago
I just borrowed the Guinness Book of World Records 2010 from the library, and found this. I looked this up on YouTube as soon as a got home :P
Guessmylevel 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fake and edited.... at 0:10 look carefully and observe the individuals to the right and to the left, notice their arms positions, their standing positions, etc.....also notice " Mary Stuart's" position while laying over the stone..... replay from 0:10 as many times as needed, you'll see the cut for yourself.... good video though..
Manny4Sound 7 months ago
Comment removed
Manny4Sound 7 months ago
Es una ejecución FALSA.
cachibache2100 7 months ago
BRILLIANT!!!! I am so happy to beable to view this!
IHeartHelloKitty1974 8 months ago
It is not real, it is actually the first piece of film footage to use special effects. This clip uses stop action to create the beheading. (2010 Guinness Book of Records p396)
Jsmiley007 10 months ago
0:09 moment of the change
cicisilver 10 months ago
Lol its over a hundred years old. Of course it's going to look fake. Excuse them for not having the special effects we have today --'
imkohia 10 months ago
It looks old enough to be the real thing ....
rees276 10 months ago
Se o Rapaduracast te trouxe ak de um "voto positivo"
diegopyro 10 months ago 4
how movie from 1895 didnt not know that they have movies from that year didnt even know that they have camera that day
Sabic18 1 year ago
@Sabic18 lol i agree
fruitcakeasylum 1 year ago
AHAHAh What version of After effects was used in this?
SirFancyBubbles 1 year ago
@4711inside I know my history and when the we were starting to make the first films etc...don't you worry I finished my high school in Europe and its tough school, I was just explaining the video how unreal it looks.. beside I didnt even pay attention at the name of the woman..
87Euroboy 1 year ago
Not real.. you can see after she gets down and get ready do die..the image changed and that's a doll or something
87Euroboy 1 year ago
people actually thought the actress gave her life to make it it was that compelling for its time
blablaman233 1 year ago
You beat me to my comment. As crude as these early films seem it is worth noting the use of film editing to create this "effect". It must have seemed rather realistic and shocking to people of the day.
carlsetzer 1 year ago
i find these old movies very spooky
queenjoanne1984 1 year ago
Oh yeah! the man who created this first "film trick" is called Alfred Clark, working in Edison's production.
PilotzInTheSky 1 year ago
This was actually the first "film trick" in history. The first manipulation of the camera for optical purposes. In other words the first cinematographic optical illusion! Later came Georges Méliès with his famous "magic tricks" through the cinematographe. Méliès really explored camera tricks!
PilotzInTheSky 1 year ago
If you look at the video, there is a cut. You can tell it was a dummy afterwards, and reason is that the dummy looks too stif as if it was made out wood with a dress on.
Miccheal 1 year ago
Hello, it was made in 1895!! Of course it's gonna be fake and of course it's gonna look bad. Bit this and the House of the Devil are the roots of cinematic horror. So stop drooling over whether it looks fake or not. It's a goddamn movie. Idiots.
SinisterSammich 1 year ago
I can't believe people were stupid enough to think this was real. Fail. It's the first film to use trained actors, I believe.
TheMikeyX 1 year ago 2
Thanks YouTubers for clarifying this is fake. I had thought it was the first snuff film made by time travelers.
mphtower 1 year ago 3
Thanks for this piece of film history
tigranvartanovitch 1 year ago
u can see it cut at 0:10
HorrorMovieFan87 1 year ago
omg it is fake bc A: look at the way he looked at the camera B: wwhen the executioner cut her head off nad then when he picked it up her hair fell of bc she wore a wig besides at 0:11 look at the way the doll was set up
itsgiragain 1 year ago
@itsgiragain We all bow to your amazing intelligence which made you figure out that this is not real, although the descriptions says that it is not real.
Einmaliger 1 year ago
@itsgiragain and bc mary queen of scots was executed in 1587. jesus, people. know your history.
NYofthePacific 1 year ago 3
@NYofthePacific haha nice reply
legion5220 1 year ago
fake determined a fake by the Society for Truth debunked
ghostman3331 1 year ago
they used a real actor until 0:11 , then they brung in a doll
booyahhayoob 1 year ago
First of all,it took actually more than blow to over her head,also she was wearing a wig & when they picked up her head the wig came off & her(she wore a wig cause her hair had become completely Grey)
purplecat11 1 year ago
It's fake
nodge69r 2 years ago
hehe... cool.
singapuraxrftgtxrose 2 years ago
so fake.
libra61060 2 years ago
Yes ... it's a movie. Are you also complaining during Star Wars movies that the people are only acting like they're space heroes?
Superphilipp 1 year ago
@libra61060
Eighteen-ninety-five.
They were lucky enough to get actors, a working camera, an axe, and costumes all in the same place at once.
Npowell01 1 year ago
People come in here expecting gore and amazing special effects without a break in the camera frame
IT'S 1895 WHAT DO YOU EXPECT
goodygoody23 2 years ago
fuckin hell are you all stupid, read the fuckin info first. the person who put this up is not sayin this real. ur all fuckin oxegen thiefs!!!!
lissluis 2 years ago
PWND
rumpranger65 2 years ago
for a film made in 1895 this footage of an execution is better then the ones you see in films of today & im not just saying that lol
faithoffaith 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fake video ..look btw 09 sec and 10
kimozean 2 years ago
its just because that the graphics that time were not good as today
Sidneius 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's fake. Mary Stuart was executed in 1567; this film was made in 1895. :P
velony 2 years ago
People know it's fake...it's a movie about Mary Stuart. It's one of the first movies ever made. It's not supposed to be showing the actual execution.
literaturechick12 2 years ago 4
@velony Hurr durr, herpa derp derp.
We all know it is a special effect, in the same way that people in the 2020s will know all our CGI is a special effect. Now either enjoy this first ever horror film or go away. Some of us are trying to appreciate this without getting annoyed by asylum escapees.
Moseslawgiver 1 year ago
@Moseslawgiver
*I* know *you* know it was a special effect, dude. That was the joke. I would think that was obvious, Do you think anyone on the internet is so stupid as to truly believe they are informing people of the special effect work involved in the execution of Mary Stuart in *1895*, over three centuries after her death?
Do you believe the people of the internet are such nitwits and ninnies and subscribers of nitcompoopery that-
Wait. Never mind. Carry on, and sorry for the confusion.
velony 1 year ago
@velony in early film days they didnt do a very good job at consistancy they could have at least did two chops and have the wig fall of when the executioner lfted up the head and have the head drop and roll with her dog licking up blood
ghostman3331 1 year ago
Can't say that was subtle, but meh. I came here to see teh first film to use special effects, not some cutting-edge CGI.
KillTheToy11 2 years ago
damn for a 1800 film it's pretty creepy o.0
LisaBreeBranch 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fake lol
jazzpsalti 2 years ago
Read the info first.
yog28 2 years ago 2
It's fake. You can see the scene cut just before he swings the axe down. They replaced the real actor with a dummy.
TranceNemesis 2 years ago
@TranceNemesis And the Blue People in AVATAR are actually just glorified cartoons made on a computer.
I just ... durr ... found this out today ... hurr.
Moseslawgiver 1 year ago
wow , the first film i've ever seen that can switch from two mind sets , cute or disturbing .
boredandwise 2 years ago
this isnt real people, its the first horror movie ever made.
zburas985 2 years ago 31
@zburas985 did people actually think this was real, i thought it was famous enough as the first use of stop-motion as an editing tool
Blakeamania 3 months ago
fake look arms 0:10
tonnaer002 2 years ago
Looked it up on Wikipedia and this is genuinely 104 years old. It's really creepy despite the fact it's supposed to be an evecution but because of how old it looks.
ColumRogers 2 years ago
ew...that was rather disturbing. wether its real or not. o.o
Hanatbh 2 years ago
not 4 me i like stuff like this
hardcoldkash 2 years ago
everyone everyone... this aint a movie o.o..... even on the PRESIDENTS worker youtube channel he has a video of like it and saying its not fake.. uhmm
Nickgamereviews 2 years ago
They didn't "pay" to see it. Only scientists and other high society members involved in the scientific field saw this footage. Edison used it as proof that the celluloid motion capturing device did actually work.
AmarisGrey 2 years ago 2
this actrees was actually an actor. his name was robert thomae
avagraceeeeeee 2 years ago
This is pretty f'd up for a 104 year old movie. Why would you pay money to go see this?
westman34 2 years ago 2
This is the VERY first "horror" film ever i think
Gloppy605 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FAKE!!!!
babybluevbworm 2 years ago
Duh, it's fake. *rolls eyes*
glamourchick21 2 years ago
Yeah, you can definitely see the blip, and what a relief! I thought it was real at first, and was quite disturbed!
LadyTwenties 2 years ago
This was the first EVER horror movie.
crisis1991 2 years ago
Watch, he hits her in the back with the axe, but yet her head breaks off? Oh yeah, no blood, what a dumbass!
7stringkiller 3 years ago
It's a 100yrs ago movie making was just invented!!! What do yo expect? Blood gushing out the neck? Detailed decapitation? know something about filmhistory before you say something about it!
Psychotiksilence 2 years ago 5
oh you can't be that silly can you???
When Maria Stuart died, there was no Film invented...
Never read Schiller???
And I don't mean the fish..
Dumbasses you can see when they changed the person and the waxfigure... right between second 10 and 11 she gets in a different position.
Ok maybe my spelling ain't right all the time because I'm german... but all of you who thought they filmed the death of maria stuart... well let's say you should know that Maria Stuart died 1580 or something like that...
TheLittleBigL 3 years ago
Wow! A horror movie before Nosferatu!
NoirHammer 3 years ago
There were few other horror-like movies also, i.e. The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920), The Student of Prague (1913) and Manor of the Devil (1896).
Patryslaw 2 years ago
I've seen those. Good stuff!
NoirHammer 2 years ago
0:11
lolXDimcool 3 years ago
"You are Mary, Queen of Scots?"
"Oi am!"
(*Beating up noises*)
"Oi think she's dead."
"No Oi'm not!"
(*Beating up noises*)
tiferet1 3 years ago 4
HD lol
HowMuchDoUCost 3 years ago
Poor Mary. So gruesome. I wish people weren't so violent with women.
80stimeagain 3 years ago
wtf is wrong with people? you can film anything and what do you decide to be the first film?
not much has changed lol
firekind1980 3 years ago
the first horror film
also first film altogether with trained actors
killthefakes666 3 years ago 24
@killthefakes666 Also the first film with special effects!
MrSaturn33 7 months ago
It supposed the public execution by decapitation of Marie Stuart. This mini-film was performed by Edison. Along the history, many profesors says this was a geniune decapitation, but the 00:10/00:11 second makes us all to differ..
vertepasar 3 years ago 2
was this the whole movie?
Revenge1986 3 years ago 2
yes.
craesykid 3 years ago 2
may have been the first movie with trained actors i heard,and first horror movie ever made and how was it a horror,i'm not making fun of it but i'm just wondering?
AnAerosmithFan 3 years ago
back then this was extremely dramatic. many people believed her head was actually cut off back then. it actually lokked pretty good, but if you lokk extremely hard, youll see there was a split second change into a manneqin.
craesykid 3 years ago 2
ya,wonder how popular this movie was,one of the first comedies was like three minutes where a guy excesively sneezed
SuperHeroMania 3 years ago
i actually wonder how anyone ever saw it.
craesykid 3 years ago 2
August 28, 2008. The 113th year of horror, Happy Birthday, Mary.
MowenStudios 3 years ago 2
For 1895 that was pretty scary. I liked it.
xgirlfiendx 3 years ago
I can see when the actress is replaced by the mannequin. look for the blip at 0:10-0:11
Gordanfreeman456 3 years ago
is the actress really beheaded?
alpinemoldez 3 years ago
No, it is obvious that it is a dummy.
DeaneShafortock 3 years ago
First horror short ever made.
metalalan 3 years ago 2
Damn, this can't be real right? I mean by acting purspective.
feliciafan89 3 years ago
It's not real, at 00:10 you cann see, that some people are chaning the pose. It's just cutted togehter.
But it's a great special effect for 1895
scar89 3 years ago