Our uranium,our chemicals for such downey soft comforts as modern medicine, all come from that cesspool and political insurrection that is the continent I was born on. If we want the world to move forward, the only thing that will continue it is a strong, stable Africa. Allowing world corporations and large banks to bleed Africa dry through debts and tairrifs will only work against America having a bright future.
Well, because I have worked very hard, on the ground, on what's happening in the world. For example, I have lead a task force on US-Russia relations... Der... Uhh... Council on Foreign Relations.
This baffoon's poverty tour is nothing more than a political vaudeville. You gotta let go of this notion that we, the most powerful nation of economic and social elites, can eradicate the miseries of poor, uneducated, helpless in Africa and Asia - problems which they don't understand too well. The demo political candidates often exploit education, poverty, and inequity because these have a lot of emotional appeal and it helps push their collectivist economic agendas. This is disgusting.
Tooltalk: Why don't you post this sort of thing on a Republican candidate's video? None of Edwards' audience is interested in remarks like these, and in fact, we find them disgusting.
Please keep your Social Darwinist economic agenda to yourself.
Oh, did I hurt your feeling by criticizing your idol? I love you democrats, so-called progressives - you guys are such an open-minded crowd; not to mention your superior morality and intellect. Why don't you study the issue of poverty if you care at all about your candidate. Stop talking with your ass.
Where in the constitution does it say that the US Federal government has a responsibility (or even the authority) to educate 100 million elementary students in other countries? If US citizens want to contribute money to causes like this, they can do it through charitable organizations.
Exactly. This just sickens me, how it seems like everyone is so worried about other counties that are nothing but a burden to our own peoples well being!
He's very right on what he said about American values. The problem is that this current administration has done things that in the past would have been unspeakable for a president to do. I could never imagine the Clinton or even Reagan white houses condoning torture or spying upon Americans. Our values have been distorted and we need to go back to the way we were before all this madness.
Eliminating poverty is an admirable cause, but it ultimately it's not as simple as just feeding them. Or even educating them. It ultimately gets back to spreading democracy. The countries where people are most destitute tend to be dictatorships. So how does he plan to eliminate dictatorships?
Well, not that simple. there is actually no correlationship between good governance (i.e. dictator, democracy, policy) and economic growth. Most of the East Asian countries that experienced rapid economic growth (reduction poverty, higher living standard) in the 60s-80s, for instance, were under some form of authoritarian gov't.
Dictators often steal the country's wealth, leaving everyone else starving. And of course you can't vote the bums out of office. This isn't true in democracies. I would agree that other factors are involved, but democracy still helps. Oh, and there's no such word as "correlationship".
if u r right, India the largest democracy in the world should have experienced huge economic growth bet 50-80. There is no single political system that guarantees your economic well-being. Democracy, widely misconceived by many, including Bush, isn't the be-all end-all solution.
Democracy is the ONLY solution. If you think people of a particular country do NOT deserve to live under a free representative system, please name them.
Democracy is not a precondition for economic takeoff; neither is saving/investment, technology, or education. I find your comment a bit arrogant and I find it annoying that the word democracy is thrown around carelessly to justify everything from war to poverty.
I didn't attempt to justify war. I think Iraq was ill conceived to put it mildly. Perhaps I don't understand your position...do you see the spread of democracy as a desirable goal for all nations?
I miss Sen. Edwards.
:(
CaptainPhillibuster 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
We don't want a John Ritter look-alike president!
Vote Hillary '08!
JoseAnd911World 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your videos are ghay. thank god for you that YouTube/Google is an online media branch for the ultra-liberal wing of the Democrat Party.
wowzers987654321 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why John Edwards licks cum off his lips every minute or so?
VermoXL 4 years ago 2
why is it white behind edwards
Wildarms7OOO 4 years ago
Yes, quite a good effect, he's got a good video team...to go with the haircut.
Cheerios99 4 years ago
"Africa, Africa" Who cares?! What about AMERICA. That's what you're running for, to be the President of AMERICA. Damn, that's annoying.
Strengthxpain 4 years ago
Our uranium,our chemicals for such downey soft comforts as modern medicine, all come from that cesspool and political insurrection that is the continent I was born on. If we want the world to move forward, the only thing that will continue it is a strong, stable Africa. Allowing world corporations and large banks to bleed Africa dry through debts and tairrifs will only work against America having a bright future.
0griggs 4 years ago
he is very loud
salvador36213 4 years ago
Jeez, whats with the snail-phone?
Io42 4 years ago 2
this is incredible, good work and i hope to see more presidential interviews in the future.
da133 4 years ago
Well, because I have worked very hard, on the ground, on what's happening in the world. For example, I have lead a task force on US-Russia relations... Der... Uhh... Council on Foreign Relations.
haha
1Raven4u 4 years ago
Evidently, James isn't a master video editor. He's busy trying to get his arrogant ass on TV, that's all.
ArtificialReality 4 years ago
This baffoon's poverty tour is nothing more than a political vaudeville. You gotta let go of this notion that we, the most powerful nation of economic and social elites, can eradicate the miseries of poor, uneducated, helpless in Africa and Asia - problems which they don't understand too well. The demo political candidates often exploit education, poverty, and inequity because these have a lot of emotional appeal and it helps push their collectivist economic agendas. This is disgusting.
tooltalk 4 years ago
Tooltalk: Why don't you post this sort of thing on a Republican candidate's video? None of Edwards' audience is interested in remarks like these, and in fact, we find them disgusting.
Please keep your Social Darwinist economic agenda to yourself.
Naturyl 4 years ago
Oh, did I hurt your feeling by criticizing your idol? I love you democrats, so-called progressives - you guys are such an open-minded crowd; not to mention your superior morality and intellect. Why don't you study the issue of poverty if you care at all about your candidate. Stop talking with your ass.
tooltalk 4 years ago
haha layers meeting...figures
mark1242 4 years ago
Where in the constitution does it say that the US Federal government has a responsibility (or even the authority) to educate 100 million elementary students in other countries? If US citizens want to contribute money to causes like this, they can do it through charitable organizations.
DrMarson 4 years ago 2
Exactly. This just sickens me, how it seems like everyone is so worried about other counties that are nothing but a burden to our own peoples well being!
Strengthxpain 4 years ago
He's very right on what he said about American values. The problem is that this current administration has done things that in the past would have been unspeakable for a president to do. I could never imagine the Clinton or even Reagan white houses condoning torture or spying upon Americans. Our values have been distorted and we need to go back to the way we were before all this madness.
hill0118 4 years ago
Eliminating poverty is an admirable cause, but it ultimately it's not as simple as just feeding them. Or even educating them. It ultimately gets back to spreading democracy. The countries where people are most destitute tend to be dictatorships. So how does he plan to eliminate dictatorships?
gary
gdstark 4 years ago
He could start by impeaching Cheney and Bush.
kevinabt 4 years ago
Well, not that simple. there is actually no correlationship between good governance (i.e. dictator, democracy, policy) and economic growth. Most of the East Asian countries that experienced rapid economic growth (reduction poverty, higher living standard) in the 60s-80s, for instance, were under some form of authoritarian gov't.
tooltalk 4 years ago
Dictators often steal the country's wealth, leaving everyone else starving. And of course you can't vote the bums out of office. This isn't true in democracies. I would agree that other factors are involved, but democracy still helps. Oh, and there's no such word as "correlationship".
gary
gdstark 4 years ago
if u r right, India the largest democracy in the world should have experienced huge economic growth bet 50-80. There is no single political system that guarantees your economic well-being. Democracy, widely misconceived by many, including Bush, isn't the be-all end-all solution.
tooltalk 4 years ago
Democracy is the ONLY solution. If you think people of a particular country do NOT deserve to live under a free representative system, please name them.
gary
gdstark 4 years ago
Democracy is not a precondition for economic takeoff; neither is saving/investment, technology, or education. I find your comment a bit arrogant and I find it annoying that the word democracy is thrown around carelessly to justify everything from war to poverty.
tooltalk 4 years ago
I didn't attempt to justify war. I think Iraq was ill conceived to put it mildly. Perhaps I don't understand your position...do you see the spread of democracy as a desirable goal for all nations?
gary
gdstark 4 years ago
i'm with berliita...how do u explain what happened at 01:37?
mozartsnum1fan 4 years ago
Hi, James.
At 1:37 there's a cut. How come?
Isn't this supposed to be the unabridged version?
What did you cut off?
berliita 4 years ago