thought: in a 1 on 1 battle against an abrams or leo 2 the t-90 would probably lose for one simple reason, if a t-90 went up against an abrams or leo 2 the t-90 would be a monkey model, the Russians have no reason to be hostile with us and therefore the russian spec t-90 would be side by side rather than head to head with an abrams or leopard 2
@aracaen "in a 1 on 1 battle against an abrams or leo 2 the t-90 would probably lose for one simple reason, if a t-90 went up against an abrams or leo 2 the t-90 would be a monkey model"
Term "Monkey Model" has a very broad meaning. If you can't describe particular aspects in which a particular "monkey model" is downgraded to original version, then you simply can't determine how dangerous or how not dangerous it would be against Abrams or Leopard.
@BitnikGr i guess what i'm referring to is from the first Gulf War, the gap between Iraqi T-72s and actual russian t-72s, that's about how big i see the gap between t-90s that any country with a reason to engage in a hot conflict with us and actual russian t-90s would be, because most of the countries that have the political connections and money to get decent t-90s are usually at most, indifferent towards the west
i love the BMPT it rullz !!!! the best tactic i swear !! T-90s + BMPT will knock the shit out of any other tank and IFV in the world on a head on battle
i think it has been said a thousand times already that the tanks used in Iraq were "monkey models" of T-72 and old T-55s. Which were giant paper weights. Calling T-80U and T-90S paperweights is either intentional trolling or total lazzyness on the part of the poster to get himself familiar with this tanks.
You can find armour value tables as well as detailed info on FCS, thermal optics, active protection systems (of which none are standard issue on NATO MBTs, I must add) for all the modern tanks. When carefully compared it is clear that there are no clear winners on the issue of which tank is the best. The main factor that will determine the victor in the future battles between these machines will be the crew and strategy employed by the crew.
Dude there were no M1 mods in gulf war and so what if heli can hit tank?) Do you know that 40 % Abrams just have been choked up with dust on a way in first war?
Try to get independed information, not US propoganda))). Peace!
Im actually not a big fun of americans though they are dominating state in our current diplomacy, but I also don't want russians with their high-self estimations.I'd would like to see another russia where caucaseans would be welcomed in russia - othervise "Poshli vi na xuy"!
How caucaseans would be welcomed in Russia, if you say "Poshli vi na xuy"? is it only one u can say? try to become more civilized, now u are typical caucasean(. Try to insult me without reason...
Actually azerbaijan is also not a worthy shit like russia, all the CIS are shitty countries of poor bastards! короче все страны снг - полнейшее говно диктатуры!
а хули ты хотел, вон польша у штатов сосет и дохуя она разбогатела? всякие латвии Россию грязью поливают, но скоро к нам же сосать приползут. Сателиты-слышал слово? когда сша рухнут и вы сосать будете у нас. а из за таких как ты позор азербайджану, быдло ебанное
So why Leapord 2A2 is better than T90? and why T90 is not most powerful tank in the world? Even without `arena` it the best, but with it he one T90 can beat many tanks together. Do u know what arena is?
Wow, if I ever done something that make you misunderstood and angry. I'm very sorry. And I don't know what is an arena mean, so...sorry. What I meant that both tanks are great tanks. But I don't think that they are invincible. You know, there is always better tanks show up in the future, thats why I say not the most powerful. Maybe its a misunderstanding, so...sorry again.....
No, Im not angry), I just want to say that you should know more about new tanks, and especially abour protect system ARENA. It is only innovation, and installed on modern T80, dude it really unbelievably and if T90 will get it-all he will be almost invincible. There are some videos on utube about it.
You meant ARENA is an anvanced warning protective system, right. Using a highly sensivtive radar to detect incoming anti-tank rockets then counter-measure by firing rocket at the incoming weapons, some sort like that right?
it installed on the turret and automaticly hit all anti-tank shells with shrapnel before they touch tank armour. This is make any atack on tank senseless. If t 90 will get that one-he`ll become almost undead.
Wow, thats some defense. Wait, it automatic react towards the incoming attack right? What if ten bad guys all fire RPG towards the tank(never happened cause in practicle), can it defeat all incoming attack?
ARENA has little delay between defeat incoming attack, less 1 second, and RPG 32 with tandem warhead can break through it. But if guys in tank won`t sleep you`ll never come up close enough T90 with all his systems
Yeah, and I think modernized russian army won't sent such valuable asset alone into urban combat or mountain patrol. No wonder there is 0 losses on tanks during the South Ossetia War. Still, such technology I think that it is only available within the Russian army. Not for export, right?
Yes, armour in the city or mountains are very vulnerable to diff AT attack. But arena may some help this problem. I don`t know for sure about export complectation, only know that export T 90S haven`t some systems.
Wow, T-90 is one awesome tank. I thought that Russian tanks like most people said, are steel tombs. Many people said that T-90s are tanks for Abrams as target practice. I've never thought its protection is equal or even better to the Merkava tanks. Thanks for the Info : )
Who saud about steel tomb? Are they know anything about war? Abrams is 70 tonns steel tomb and silly target to 90. Merkava have good armour but not enough dinamic and speed. T 90 is 46-47 tonns weight, have D81 cannon 125 mm able to launch guided rocket. Abrams or other main tanks cant.
HEAT missiles with tandem warhead cannot defeat Arena. You can only defeat Arena if you fire two missiles one by one very fast so the second missile hits the tank while control system for the Arena is not yet able to detect it.
Tandem warhead means that there are two explosive charges in the warhead. One that is only HE meant to initiate the ERA charge, thus disabling it, while the second one (bigger) is HEAT and that one penetrates the passive armour of the tank.
ok. Have you ever heard about RPG 32? he have 2 warheads with less then 1 second delay between, and as developer says it can penetrate even arena... arena can protect only once in second, not faster.
Errr, sorry but I have no Russian typing. But I've actually see one in a video. A Javelin missiles was destroyed in midair by a T-80. In slow motion a projetile fly out on the turrent(right side) and hit the Javelin.
yeah, it can shoot any side, not only right) But our military have developed RPG 32 with tandem warhead, that probably can penetrate even arena by delay between1st and 2nd hits.
thought: in a 1 on 1 battle against an abrams or leo 2 the t-90 would probably lose for one simple reason, if a t-90 went up against an abrams or leo 2 the t-90 would be a monkey model, the Russians have no reason to be hostile with us and therefore the russian spec t-90 would be side by side rather than head to head with an abrams or leopard 2
aracaen 6 months ago
@aracaen "in a 1 on 1 battle against an abrams or leo 2 the t-90 would probably lose for one simple reason, if a t-90 went up against an abrams or leo 2 the t-90 would be a monkey model"
Term "Monkey Model" has a very broad meaning. If you can't describe particular aspects in which a particular "monkey model" is downgraded to original version, then you simply can't determine how dangerous or how not dangerous it would be against Abrams or Leopard.
BitnikGr 4 months ago
@BitnikGr i guess what i'm referring to is from the first Gulf War, the gap between Iraqi T-72s and actual russian t-72s, that's about how big i see the gap between t-90s that any country with a reason to engage in a hot conflict with us and actual russian t-90s would be, because most of the countries that have the political connections and money to get decent t-90s are usually at most, indifferent towards the west
aracaen 4 months ago
@aracaen Still, I can't get where from you made a conclusion that downgraded "monkey model" T-90 can't win a 1-on-1 duel with Leopard or Abrams...
BitnikGr 4 months ago
holly molly its a super tank it goes underwater
bmak2100 8 months ago
What was that rolling up at 7:44, with the mine rollers?
tommyzDad 9 months ago
nr1
zoran163 1 year ago
БМПТ суко крута выглядит. тока че с ней в пробеге? а на 3-4 км.? нах сдалали:. гумна кусок на т-55 шасси
ra8791 1 year ago
лучший суко! хотя скорее Ст, по сравнению с меркавой и абрамсомсом. иудеи пиздец замутили) его б на рязанщину)))
ra8791 1 year ago
were is the t-72m1 all i saw was the t-90
KHfreak7526 1 year ago
i love the BMPT it rullz !!!! the best tactic i swear !! T-90s + BMPT will knock the shit out of any other tank and IFV in the world on a head on battle
Cnupoc 1 year ago
For those who are looking for english subtitled videos about T-90. You can see some of them here:
/watch?v=8paDwGHAy-s
/watch?v=2h4uUfYnXUw
/watch?v=V7nGWFL1zPo
/watch?v=aS7dcK6SAEo
Also, I have videos about T-64 and about tank crews during WW II on Eastern Front, if you are interesting.
BitnikGr 2 years ago 4
Interesting, just download it.
kirillvz 2 years ago
@BitnikGr any on the BMPT?
starknight97 4 months ago
@starknight97 There are some detailed insights about BMPT from ExpoArms 2011, but not in English unfortunately.
BitnikGr 4 months ago
@BitnikGr yeah i'll have to stick too text for the time being then thxs.
starknight97 4 months ago
subtitulos en castellano or english please !!
zagueee 2 years ago
no problms, what u want to know?
kirillvz 2 years ago
Read a reply above.
BitnikGr 2 years ago
fuck that would hurt being inside that thing once it goes off a jump!
wikikomoto 2 years ago
I read how two tanks tried to repeat this trick: both tanks were crashed, crew of one get to hospital...
kirillvz 2 years ago
oh man there ya go, point proven
cause seriously russian tanks have the smallest crew areas of any vehical and have all the way back since WW2
wikikomoto 2 years ago
why this video so popular in South Korea ?
EcilopRus 2 years ago
вот вам! бойтесь уроды натовские:)))
MrFEDOT22 2 years ago 3
RUSSIAN WEAPONS RULZ
Vladimirulz 2 years ago 13
ooohh sure, i understand everything!!!!
Leo222222000 2 years ago 4
@Leo222222000 Learn russian asshole
Prorok107 2 years ago
@Prorok107 , sucha lovly message, marryechrismats
Leo222222000 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no russian tank can take out a US one just cheap death traps they performed bad in iraq and chechnya. like giant paper weights.
cameronthegreat1 2 years ago
i think it has been said a thousand times already that the tanks used in Iraq were "monkey models" of T-72 and old T-55s. Which were giant paper weights. Calling T-80U and T-90S paperweights is either intentional trolling or total lazzyness on the part of the poster to get himself familiar with this tanks.
Iggy82xl 2 years ago 3
You can find armour value tables as well as detailed info on FCS, thermal optics, active protection systems (of which none are standard issue on NATO MBTs, I must add) for all the modern tanks. When carefully compared it is clear that there are no clear winners on the issue of which tank is the best. The main factor that will determine the victor in the future battles between these machines will be the crew and strategy employed by the crew.
Iggy82xl 2 years ago 2
Impressive!! Although I did not understand what the narrater is saying, I still enjoyed the video!! Russian tanks lead the way!!
380800 2 years ago
Thank bro. Greeting the Singapore!!!
kirillvz 2 years ago
Warning!! T-72M1 tanks can be easily destroyed by the US helicopter Apache. As have been witnessed during the gulf war.
aghabeypasha 2 years ago
Dude there were no M1 mods in gulf war and so what if heli can hit tank?) Do you know that 40 % Abrams just have been choked up with dust on a way in first war?
Try to get independed information, not US propoganda))). Peace!
kirillvz 2 years ago
You are right about M1 mods, I am wrong, my bad. Where can I get independent info? The US is everywhere.
aghabeypasha 2 years ago
Oh dude, I dont know. I only know about info on Russian. You should try to find more different souses.
kirillvz 2 years ago
Russian propaganda, American propaganda, British propaganda.. c'mon man.
aghabeypasha 2 years ago 4
Evrything except Fighters can be destroyed with Apache...
14EMC88 2 years ago
WOW...wot eta orushiya...moshno iti v boy
macarubka 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck russia !!!
Azerbaijan is goin' to buy A1M1 Abrams!
so2murad 2 years ago
ok, you can buy any steel expensive tombs you want, but why you try to hurt my country?
kirillvz 2 years ago
Im actually not a big fun of americans though they are dominating state in our current diplomacy, but I also don't want russians with their high-self estimations.I'd would like to see another russia where caucaseans would be welcomed in russia - othervise "Poshli vi na xuy"!
so2murad 2 years ago
How caucaseans would be welcomed in Russia, if you say "Poshli vi na xuy"? is it only one u can say? try to become more civilized, now u are typical caucasean(. Try to insult me without reason...
kirillvz 2 years ago
I said "othervise" - can u read in English ?
Actually azerbaijan is also not a worthy shit like russia, all the CIS are shitty countries of poor bastards! короче все страны снг - полнейшее говно диктатуры!
so2murad 2 years ago
а хули ты хотел, вон польша у штатов сосет и дохуя она разбогатела? всякие латвии Россию грязью поливают, но скоро к нам же сосать приползут. Сателиты-слышал слово? когда сша рухнут и вы сосать будете у нас. а из за таких как ты позор азербайджану, быдло ебанное
kirillvz 2 years ago
opat ti tut gnida
MacMexaN 2 years ago
v jopu tebe opat dam, dolbanniy schwein !
so2murad 2 years ago
))) opat?) ti nawerno mena pereputal s kem-to obiz'yana cernaya),da pritom i pidorskaya)
MacMexaN 2 years ago
molchat schwein prostitut(-ka), Natashka is Antaliyskogo pritona.
so2murad 2 years ago
sosi xuy azerbot) zri akwarel-bluy radugoy OSLAN!)
MacMexaN 2 years ago
бля мужики хватит вам чернить друг друга.
будьте вы цивилизованными, не поддавайтесь на дешевые провакации
kirillvz 2 years ago
город Нижний Тагил. Полигон Старатель
MsGreddy 2 years ago 4
hasta los RUSOS DICEN Q EL EJERCITO SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHLENO ESTA LLENO DE HOMOSEXUALES COBARDES.
Cesar3781 2 years ago
What this mean?
kirillvz 2 years ago
It means that the people from Chile are gay.
I am from Peru we love Russia.
Cesar3781 2 years ago 3
Thanks bro! Hope not all Chileans are so stupid as this)
Greeting Chile!
kirillvz 2 years ago
T-90, It may not be the most powerful tank in the world. But its one of my most favorite military vehicle I've seen so far, besides the Leapord 2A2.
willychong8921 2 years ago
So why Leapord 2A2 is better than T90? and why T90 is not most powerful tank in the world? Even without `arena` it the best, but with it he one T90 can beat many tanks together. Do u know what arena is?
kirillvz 2 years ago
Wow, if I ever done something that make you misunderstood and angry. I'm very sorry. And I don't know what is an arena mean, so...sorry. What I meant that both tanks are great tanks. But I don't think that they are invincible. You know, there is always better tanks show up in the future, thats why I say not the most powerful. Maybe its a misunderstanding, so...sorry again.....
willychong8921 2 years ago
No, Im not angry), I just want to say that you should know more about new tanks, and especially abour protect system ARENA. It is only innovation, and installed on modern T80, dude it really unbelievably and if T90 will get it-all he will be almost invincible. There are some videos on utube about it.
kirillvz 2 years ago
You meant ARENA is an anvanced warning protective system, right. Using a highly sensivtive radar to detect incoming anti-tank rockets then counter-measure by firing rocket at the incoming weapons, some sort like that right?
willychong8921 2 years ago
it installed on the turret and automaticly hit all anti-tank shells with shrapnel before they touch tank armour. This is make any atack on tank senseless. If t 90 will get that one-he`ll become almost undead.
kirillvz 2 years ago
Wow, thats some defense. Wait, it automatic react towards the incoming attack right? What if ten bad guys all fire RPG towards the tank(never happened cause in practicle), can it defeat all incoming attack?
willychong8921 2 years ago
ARENA has little delay between defeat incoming attack, less 1 second, and RPG 32 with tandem warhead can break through it. But if guys in tank won`t sleep you`ll never come up close enough T90 with all his systems
kirillvz 2 years ago
Yeah, and I think modernized russian army won't sent such valuable asset alone into urban combat or mountain patrol. No wonder there is 0 losses on tanks during the South Ossetia War. Still, such technology I think that it is only available within the Russian army. Not for export, right?
willychong8921 2 years ago
Yes, armour in the city or mountains are very vulnerable to diff AT attack. But arena may some help this problem. I don`t know for sure about export complectation, only know that export T 90S haven`t some systems.
kirillvz 2 years ago
Wow, T-90 is one awesome tank. I thought that Russian tanks like most people said, are steel tombs. Many people said that T-90s are tanks for Abrams as target practice. I've never thought its protection is equal or even better to the Merkava tanks. Thanks for the Info : )
willychong8921 2 years ago
Who saud about steel tomb? Are they know anything about war? Abrams is 70 tonns steel tomb and silly target to 90. Merkava have good armour but not enough dinamic and speed. T 90 is 46-47 tonns weight, have D81 cannon 125 mm able to launch guided rocket. Abrams or other main tanks cant.
kirillvz 2 years ago
HEAT missiles with tandem warhead cannot defeat Arena. You can only defeat Arena if you fire two missiles one by one very fast so the second missile hits the tank while control system for the Arena is not yet able to detect it.
Tandem warhead means that there are two explosive charges in the warhead. One that is only HE meant to initiate the ERA charge, thus disabling it, while the second one (bigger) is HEAT and that one penetrates the passive armour of the tank.
Iggy82xl 2 years ago
ok. Have you ever heard about RPG 32? he have 2 warheads with less then 1 second delay between, and as developer says it can penetrate even arena... arena can protect only once in second, not faster.
kirillvz 2 years ago
type:
ВТТВ-Омск-99. Полигон. Т-80 У-М1"Барс"
u can see tank with ARENA on the turret.
kirillvz 2 years ago
Errr, sorry but I have no Russian typing. But I've actually see one in a video. A Javelin missiles was destroyed in midair by a T-80. In slow motion a projetile fly out on the turrent(right side) and hit the Javelin.
willychong8921 2 years ago 2
yeah, it can shoot any side, not only right) But our military have developed RPG 32 with tandem warhead, that probably can penetrate even arena by delay between1st and 2nd hits.
kirillvz 2 years ago
By the way, have you ever heard of Drozd? What is that? Is it similar to the Arena system?
willychong8921 2 years ago 3
yes but it really old system and arena is absolutely another level with another capacityies.
kirillvz 2 years ago
Абмрамс бы посмотреть на этом полигоне ))
Drinkius 2 years ago
В Абу-Даби уже посмотрели, когда при выполнении крена у абрамса порвался трак)). 70 тонн дорогостоящего говна)
kirillvz 2 years ago
Да эт я читал, просто никак не найду видео где абрамсы по полосе препятствий идут, их же как то испытывают, а видео на этот счет редкость какая то...
Drinkius 2 years ago
Между прочим я общался с сержантом армии США, если дойдут руки спрошу его на счет видео испытаний их техники.
kirillvz 2 years ago
Было бы очень ) ...
Drinkius 2 years ago