"He is disappointed that, due to lunar gravity, the rock doesn't roll very far."
You ignorant! inertia has nothing to do with gravity. In fact, a ball on the Moon on a flat surface would roll further since there's a fifth as much friction against the surface (proportional to the ball's weight) and no air resistance to oppose its advance.
If it were faked, why didn't they just use an inflatable rock, like at the ending of Rammstein's music video Amerika ( search for it on youtube ) you ask ? Because it would defeat the very PURPOSE of this faked event. They wanted to see just how powerful the media was, in its control of the public's mind --- even though it clearly is in Earth gravity, people believe it because Walter Kronkite says so. It was very similar to the "War of the World's" ---- a social experiment, really.
@mooninquirer The moon landing was one big trial of the ASCH CONFORMITY EXPERIMENT ( search for that on youtube ). They wanted to test to what extent would the public not trust their own eyes, their own common sense, and there own judgment. Indeed, on the one year anniversary of the first moon landing, a poll revealed that 30 % of the public doubted it. But with the media and politicians constantly referring to it as a fact, that number went down to 11 % for the 30 th anniversary.
Oh bullshit I was 20 when the first apollo landing occured NOBODY thought it was faked. It wasn't until Capricorn One that all the hoaxtards came out of the woodwork because they saw a Hollywood Movee and are like little kids . Same thing with The Philadelphia Experiment.
@mooninquirer moon inquirer you are getting the wrong type answers from your inquireys because you are an utter douchbag,paranoid insecure little dweeb.go up to gene cernan and tell him he never went,he would kick your fat pimply ass
@guitarnashelter No, because it was a football player who asked one science teacher, and a president of the National Honor Society ( actually, that was more like being student council president at my school ), asked another science teacher, in high school ---- it was NOT just me. And in college, I had several professors saying on their own accord, without being prompted by any student's question, that the moon landing was a hoax, and one that should be laughed at.
@guitarnashelter Gene Cernan has A LOT more money than I do, so I doubt that he would kick my ass, even as much as I would love to have that battery case. Also, Cernan did not attack Sibrel, so why would he attack me ? The MOST emotionally unstable of these Apollo astronauts is Buzz Aldrin.
@mooninquirer well hes an old man who will die a hero,you are a nobody who will live in a caravan with only ur dog to give you a blow job,have a nice life
Looks EXACTLY like kicking a rock in Earth gravity, including the sand that was kicked up, which should have gone 6 times higher on the moon. That rock would weigh about three pounds on the moon, and would have done a lot more than that slight roll, with that powerful kicking motion.
@krisdevalle I would estimate that rock would weigh 3 pounds on the moon. I am NOT embellishing when I say that this looks EXACTLY like kicking such a rock on Earth --- they just slowed down the footage. There isn't even evidence of 1/2 gravity, let alone 1/6 gravity. Things should look much, much more like a zero gravity condition, than an Earth gravity condition. For example they should have EASILY banged out a set of 10 one armed pull ups on the rung of the ladder.
@mooninquirer Why should it look like zero gravity? That is a lack of gravity.
1/6th gravity still means a gravitational acceleration constant of 1.6metres per second squared.
Schmidt even says 'roll' which means, obviously, he's not kicking the rock to get any air - he's pushing it along the ground, down a slope. And frankly, if this is set up and faked, then why wouldn't they just use a foam rock to make it look better?
I fear your analysis is based simply on your opinion only.
@krisdevalle I didn't SAY that it would look like zero gravity, and you know it ! I said it should look MORE like zero gravity, than like Earth gravity. You are not being a sincere debater here ---- meaning you do not yourself believe man went to the moon. Are you a fan of David Duke ? Does the song by Saga ( search for it on youtube ) called "An Ode to a Dying People" have a special resonance for you ?
QURAN 55:5 The sun and the moon[move] by precise calculation
35:13 He causes the night to enter the day, and? He causes the day to enter the night and has subjected the sun and the moon - each running [its course] for a specified term. That is Allah, your Lord; to Him belongs sovereignty. And those whom you invoke other than Him do not possess [as much as] the membrane of a date seed
25:61 Blessed is He who has placed in the sky great stars and placed therein a [burning]lamp and luminous moon
@theREALkaner I do not claim to be superior. I claim to have knowledge of physics and computer programming... facts that JetFreak refuses to believe. Call me garbage all you like... doesn't change the fact jetfreak is an arrogant little turd, who maintains that ANYONE who disagrees with him must be stupid. btw... I realise that I am nothing... no one will give a shit when I die, and don't I know it.
People listen the Moon landings are fake because of the facts of film visuals and the scenry of the fact there are no stars in the video's? Nothing at all.
Plus Hollywood Director came forth and admitted they made video for the public for a deal with the goverment unlimited use of military craft and future projects for movies.. deal done and made.
As for the rock, what kind of braindead fuckwit would kick a boulder in a pressurized suit? On another world with no medics? real fuckin smart! NOT!! all it takes is 1 tear and you got 1 dead astronaut.
@bjm351 The astronaut is wearing thick, padded lunar overshoes over the normal spacesuit boots. The spacesuit has an integrated thermal micrometeoroid garment capable of withstanding tiny speeding impacts, and is about 13 layers, including mylar, non-woven dacron, etc.
This is the 6th mission to the moon with no spacesuit failures. The astronauts are confident that kicking a rock will not result in death.
Know the context and you will understand the situation.
@krisdevalle Thanks for explaining that mate! i still wouldnt try it if i was up their though! They shouldve taken a golf set up their or a proper footy n kicked it to see how far it would go!
I love the way the cameras follow the astronauts especially when they leave the moon surface back to earth I wonder whom filmed that and was left behind to fly back alone did you guy' notice these things.
@Dorisequador `apparently` that camera was remote controlled by Houston lol!! Which says to me, that their should be PLENTY of footage from that camera if its still up their yeh? notice how the camera never shows them go all the way into space? it actually pans back down to the ground! and the camera on board conveniently stops filming at the same height that the ground camera starts to pan down. cables were only 90ft high i think. ALL MOON FOOTAGE IS FAKE. but some of the photos are real.......
@bjm351 remote controled in 1969? hmmmm I know we went around the moon and came back yes thats true landed? I think not. they launched a teliscope to show us the planets out there yes very nice but show us proof live that your landing existed and I want real footage. Not bullshit fake crap.
I do believe all moon footage is fake fake fucking fake. But I do believe we made it just not landed ..
If we did they have no real footage due to the cold of space breaking the film strips.
@Dorisequador Yeh thats it, all moon footage is faked but you dont need to be Einstein to work that out!! What shits me is Google moon and the friggin Hubble cant even show us a crystal clear view of the landing spots. We see NO evidence of buggy tracks on moon or rover tracks on Mars. Now i know Mars has wild storms but apparently the moon doesnt, so all the footprints and tracks should be clearly visible. but they arent. You would think they would be proud to show off the landing site!!
@krisdevalle interesting! got a link or is it on their site? How come the Jap probe didnt see it that flew pretty low didint it? they shouldve crashed it somewhere near the Apollo spot so it could flyover low! but yeh keen to see these pics!!
@bjm351 IF you google for 'BBC LRO' you should get the news article about it.
The Kaguya probe did not have as big a camera. The LRO has two cameras, the NAC and WAC (Narrow and Wide Angle Cameras) and while the science payload is different 7 instruments, the camera instrument is only part of the setup, and as I recall weighs about 20kg. This is a lot different from Earth satellite cams that can weight up to 700kg. It's easier to get smaller things to the moon.
@krisdevalle hmmmm so i looked at the photos, only the shadows dont match up!! for 1, the Apollo gear has the blackest of black shadows, while all the rest are pale, and the shadows being cast are from the wrong direction!! LEM is casting a shadow to the east, while everything else is casting a shadow to the west!! Dammit i knew id find something wrong with it!! Also theres not enough tracks for Apollo 17 for all the driving they did for 3 days!! I dunno! i just dont know!
@bjm351 How many other satellite images from the moon have you reviewed?
There is an entire staff of experts working at the Arizona State University, at the LROC web page, and they all have contact details. If you are having trouble understanding the images, then contact one of them.
If you seriously are thinking these are fakes and some one-eyed doofus retard has photoshopped the shadows the the wrong way, you are stupider than I thought.
@krisdevalle well ill stick to bein stupid and you stick to being a loyal NASA sheep ok!! Guess its too much to have a conversation without bringing the other down for their views eh? The fact that it took the 40 yrs to release a pic doesnt help. btw ive looked at hundreds of sat photos i have a whole file on them. but anyway im done talking to you your just another that sooks when someone doesnt agree with you. i guess your not as intelligent as i thought! catchya. BTW i said i dunno. not PS.
@bjm351 Perhaps I was rash; but it is an affront to say that you think the shadows are going to the 'wrong way' when obviously, these pictures have been released worldwide, and made it to the BBC and other news outlets and nobody noticed - or even if they were faked, the fakers were so stupid as to make a mistake like that. Think about it.
Do you really think that if it was faked, and NASA wanted to show it was not faked, they would be so clumsy as to mess up these images?
@bjm351 Honestly, what goes through your head when calling other people sheep? Do you not realize that the only people who are on the same boat as you are strange strange people who have nothing better to do than be internet warriors? What goes through your head when you watch videos of the Saturn V launches? Were those just for shits? When non government radars tracked the modules to the moon? What about the millions of experts who come to the opposite conclusion as your? Incredibly ignorant.
Especially with todays tech, they should be able to easily show us and then it mite shut people like me up a lil bit, but they dont. And theyre arrogant enough to say `we dont need to`. Well yes NASA you fucking do because times running out before other countries expose your lies!! it really cant be hard for them to show us. And Obama saying that the US doesnt have the tech to go back WTF? worked 40 yrs ago why not now!! its all lies!!!
Especially with todays tech, they should be able to easily show us and then it mite shut people like me up a lil bit, but they dont. And theyre arrogant enough to say `we dont need to`. Well yes NASA you fucking do because times running out before other countries expose your lies!! it really cant be hard for them to show us. And Obama saying that the US doesnt have the tech to go back WTF? worked 40 yrs ago why not now!! its all lies!!!
@krisdevalle Everybody has and opinion and thats fine but do not tell me that the moon footage is real when you can see the way they move is a wired suport movement. Plus we do not move in slow motion in space? Or on the moon they did that for affect that made me believe it was all faked.
I've seen fottage of space it's clear and smooth framed not slow motion.
Second they would not fall stupidly or kick rocks due to puncher of the suit and fear.. or wow be careful we made it.
@Dorisequador The moon footage looks real to everyone who isnt a strange messed up person who feels the desperate need to fit in with a group so they cling on to these weird ideas. Ever notice that you are in the same group as the 9/11 conspiracy guys? The UFO weirdos? The Flat Earthers? The chemtrail nuts? The Japanese earthquake nuclear false flag conspiracy theorists? See a pattern here? DO YOU? YOU ARE PART of that group that the rest of us laugh at for not using a shred of critical thinking
@Dorisequador The moon footage looks real to everyone who isnt a strange messed up person who feels the desperate need to fit in with a group so they cling on to these weird ideas. Ever notice that you are in the same group as the 9/11 conspiracy guys? The UFO weirdos? The Flat Earthers? The chemtrail nuts? The Japanese earthquake nuclear false flag conspiracy theorists? See a pattern here? DO YOU? YOU ARE PART of that group that the rest of us laugh at for not using a shred of critical thinking
@Dorisequador The moon footage looks real to everyone who isnt a strange messed up person who feels the desperate need to fit in with a group so they cling on to these weird ideas. Ever notice that you are in the same group as the 9/11 conspiracy guys? The UFO weirdos? The Flat Earthers? The chemtrail nuts? The Japanese earthquake nuclear false flag conspiracy theorist? See a pattern here? DO YOU? YOU ARE PART of that group that the rest of us laugh at for not using a shred of critical thinking
@Dorisequador Thank you for proving my point exactly. And I love it when people try to call others stupid, when they themselves can barely cobble together a proper sentence with correct spelling. Yeah, nice going buddy. You are exactly what we've come to expect from this group. Goodbye.
@philritter21 Well who's gonna answer you at night a scientist or doctor or a Lawyer? No a Drunk couch potato like me hahaha Cannot make a proper sentence.. well if you can read I made my point.
I called you a Retard because you are one. If I actually found you to be a person who deserves respect you would have gotten respect.
I know these video's 100% are fake. Stop telling people your so intelligent and great and they are real?/ When they are not at all.
@Dorisequador havent you seen the recent satellite that went to the moon a few days ago? it took the first pictures of the landing sites again, totally gets rid of the moon hoax idea
@Dorisequador you're not gunna stop till you're actually standing right next to the LM are you? you're that stubborn ( /watch?v=PTeM4ZqEKR4&feature=channel_video_title )
@Dorisequador What are you then ? Oh so you think every engineers who work for NASA and space agencies (aka the best engineers on earth) are stupid, or part of a big lie ? Wow really... You dare insult me. As I said, get help!
@toocoolforu Engineers that worked on the original spce program did a decent job but today they sell the public a lie. The past video's were all faked and everyone went along with it that mattered they sold it to their staff. Get a buge pay check and shut up and keep your job and have a meal on the table. The others just believed the lie.. like everybody else. They made it they landed but the video's are fakes.
At that time people wanted a show so they gave it to them.
@Dorisequador If you can't make it...fake it! lol...We were not that smart back then...heck, they didn't even realize to start equal rights until ten years "after" the fact (Which should have been way sooner!). This was the same generation that said it was healthy to stuff yourself full of food, cigarettes are okay and cool, water makes you weak, and what are lead toys etc.? They didn't know crap! lol Likewise, we still don't know much! lol
@stephen2152002 I agree man I talked to people of age back then who worked on such similare things they had no way of doing what they said in that time.. Their tech back then just wasn't up to par They went into space then came back.. that's it.. Years later Possibly but the radiation is emence. I wonder who would survive that?
Radiation outside our planets invisable sheild which goes out into space about 3 times the size of the earth which we do not understand how the planet has this.
Right, cuz kicking rocks is something NASA would want an astronaut to do in space. How safe is running around, falling on hard moon rocks, getting in/out of the buggy and driving like a lunatic up and down valleys? ONLY TARDS honestly believe we went there with that tard ass tech.
@shermanr6 Pretty safe. The integrated thermal micrometeoroid garment that goes over the top of the spacesuit had the top couple of layers consisting of rip-proof woven mylar, designed to resist the impact of tiny micrometeoroids traveling thousands of miles per hour.
You don't think NASA would so stupid as to design a flimsy, easily ripped spacesuit, do you?
Do you really think that's a thing they would overlook?
@krisdevalle You know, with limited gravity n all, u hit one of those moon rocks and the next thing u know ur ass has escaped the moons graviational field. No but seriously, 8 mph over rocks, hills, valleys and an ALIEN surface to me, is TOO dangerous, especially if im a NASA scientist. WE DIDNT GO, America is the land of the fake and home of bullshit!
@shermanr6 Boy, you really displayed your deep ignorance there.
The escape velocity of the moon is 2.38 kilometres PER SECOND.
I told you to quit while you were ahead but you had come back and say even stupider shit. You're not a NASA scientist. You think they'd design a rover that was unsafe, or incapable of dealing with the lunar surface? What the fuck is wrong with you - just because you think it's dangerous, that suddenly makes it a fake? Those guys have bigger balls than you, obviously.
@kernzyp This rock wouldn't move at all if it was on Earth. Unless you can give me exact measurements on how big the rock was, how much it weighed, etc., there is no way to calculate how much it should've moved.
@Klartank Imagine how hollow and plastic it was kicked around in the sound stage in Nevada. Wait, Im sorry...saying it was kicked around in Nevada is jumping to conclusions...definitely a sound stage on earth, so same weight though ;)
@akaredcrossbow When you actually have hard evidence the moon landing was faked, maybe people will listen to you. Until then, you're going to have to disprove scientists who don't work for the government as well as those that do. You likely believe 9/11 was the work of President Bush, that Pearl Harbor was the work of FDR, etc. People like you fit into a category I like to call FUCKTARDED.
@kennjohnsen People like you fit into a state called "losers" who haven't done their research and simply refuse to believe anything, regardless of what supporting evidence there is, largely due to some agenda they have to attack others to feel better about themselves. Nobody tells us to see or believe anything...we have the ability to think and function as individuals. You fall into a small percentage of people who don't think we went to the moon. This is the US, not Nazi Germany.
@jetfreak4 Why don't you go find some videos of a dune buggy or a sand rover at the beach, dry beach sand then get back to me K. The sand kicks off the tires and falls the same way. The only difference is that it's during the day and they haven't slowed the videos down. Looks like you are right somebody has never been to the beach. LOL
thats no rock.. its a moon turtle.. yah couldn't see, but it bit him on the boot .^_^. astronaut thoughts before kick'n it... *stupid moon turtle!! try'n to bite my foot huh? i'll give u something to bite..*..sec's later. KICK! KICK!.. ect.. lol
thats no rock.. its a moon turtle.. yah could see, but it bit him on the boot .^_^. astronaut thoughts before kick'n it... *stupid moon turtle!! try'n to bite my foot huh? i'll give u something to bite..*..sec's later. KICK! KICK!.. ect.. lol
@fauxnim Like you can read and know everything about me. Watergate and Guatemala are two incidents. There is solid proof that we went to the moon. Recent images taken by satellites show the equipment of several Apollo missions. And unlike these two cases, the U.S. never made these things public while they were occuring. How can two cases therefore be explanations for the rest of the times? And why would the U.S. fake the same thing 6 times? To make it convincing, right? Idiot.
@shanehoustein Further more the hijackers would have been at the front of the plane, the fireball would not happen untill the fuel tanks in the wings ruptured and ignited a long way behind the cockpit by which time the debris from the front half of the plane travelling at 100's MPH would have exited the other side of the building, hows your physics lessons going? ;)
@musicbruv this lesson is great, thanks :) I appreciate people taking the time to write comments without getting abusive. I still find it very difficult to believe that it would have survived the fireball and somehow ended up intact on top of the rubble.
@shanehoustein If you look at footage of the twin towers after the attack you will see all sorts of paper fluttering about in the air, a passport would be heavier but still float slowly to the ground possibly well away from the towers, personaly I think it is very plausable that the passport could just be laying around somewhere.
@shanehoustein You were asking for it, and quite frankly, he's being no more abusive than me. Either way, you've been served. Eat what's on your plate and maybe you'll get smart.
@jetfreak4 yeah... because my job programming computers doesn't require any smarts, right? What about the pods attached to the planes; the fact that Osama wrote with his right hand in the confession video (even tho he was left handed); the way building 7 fell; the fact that Bush and his cabinet wouldn't testify under oath; THE Israelis that went on TV to say they were there to document the event (and therefore had prior knowledge)? The list goes on and on.
@shanehoustein I seriously doubt you program computers. The so-called pods are either the engines of the plane or they were filmed with poor quality footage that is impossible to definitively make out. High quality footage which I remember seeing on the day of 9-11 showed no pods, just planes. There would have been proof of a missile in the debris. Building 7 collapsing is once again backed up by physics. Muslim tradition is one reason why Bin Laden used his right hand, or the FBI got it wrong
@jetfreak4 you seriously doubt I program computers? lmao! goes to show how assuming and arogant you are. Building 7... is also backed up by a controlled demolition expert saying it is definitely a controlled demolition. And Bin Laden writing with his right hand - it is a well known fact that he was left handed. If you choose to believe that the FBI got it wrong, or that somehow he was able to force himself to right with his right hand... go ahead... but that is not a "reasonable" explanation.
@shanehoustein Building 7 is also attested to have fallen down as the government said it did by many other controlled demolition experts. And why shouldn't I doubt you program computers? You claim to have studied physics yet clearly have no knowledge or understanding of it. It is easily plausible the FBI could have made a mistake. The U.S. government deliberately killing 3,000 citizens at random is not. Have a nice life, Truther. If you reply back, don't expect me to this time.
@jetfreak4 I was using physics just the other day... when I was programming a game using the Box2D physics engine. You are an arrogant, stuck-up, wanker of epic proportions. Better buy yourself a life time supply of tissues mate, because with your attitude you ain't ever getting laid... unless you pay for it... but I guess you'll have enough money because you're so damn smart, right!
All of the so-called lists you present have reasonable explanations. You choose to go with the outrageous ones. Now..this is done. I'll hand the rest off to musicbruv.
@fauxnim This is a waste of my time and energy arguing with a conspiracist. Do us all a favor and beat the crap out of yourself instead of starting fights on the internet. Or better yet, face the people you have a problem with in person. I'm guessing you're too much of a coward to do that. Either way, not my problem. Have a nice life.
@jetfreak4 911 was an inside job. Proof: the official story says that one hijacker was identified by his passport, which was ejected from the fireball when the plane struck the tower and fell to the street below where it was found by the FBI. Absolutely impossible! But if you want to believe it, go ahead.
@shanehoustein Explain how it's impossible, and maybe I'll believe you. You have no explanation for how it's impossible, so until you do, I choose to stick with the official story. Better yet, until you convince the majority of Americans it was an inside job, or explain why our own government would plunge our country into economic crisis, kill 3,000 of our own people, nearly bankrupt our own airline industry....etc. Makes even less sense than the FBI finding the terrorist's passport.
@jetfreak4 for starters, the rubble would have come down on top of the passport... unless the passport managed to flutter around in the air like a magic little fairy for an hour before coming to rest on top of the debris. Secondly, none of the hijackers names appeared on any passenger list, so how could the FBI assume, even for a second that the passport originated from the plane? I didn't say the government had anything to do with it. "inside" means people on the inside, not the whole govt.
@shanehoustein You're obviously lacking both in factual knowledge of 9-11, and in knowledge of the laws of physics. I don't waste my time on truthers normally, and I'm just reminded again of why I don't.
@shanehoustein You lack knowledge because anyone with knowledge of physics knows explosions are unpredictable. You'd be surprised what survived the 9-11 explosions. Jewelry, personal items, the landing gear, which was flung several miles from the towers, etc. Something as light as a passport could easily have been flung far enough away not to be covered in rubble. And it wasn't found by the FBI, but by a passerby, and not quickly either as many like you believe.
@shanehoustein Excuse me, the report says several blocks. Regardless, the report also acknowledges the presence of debris where the passport was found. Also, the alleged passenger lists were not passenger manifests: they were victims lists. And unless you believe the terrorists were victims, there is no reason why they'd appear on the lists. that's my two cents: if you don't like it, good luck selling your theory to the masses.
@shanehoustein Correct... well done the passsport would have taken a long time to hit the ground proberly a long way away, look at the smoke from the fires and you will see the wind was very strong, if you know anything about physics then you should know that heavy objects fall fast and light ones fall slower and are influenced by the atmosphere conditions. did you skip that lesson?
i may be thick as two short planks, but how does loose rocks sit on the moon?...hopefully some genius will answer that for me!!....lunar gravity...lol as it tells me
@spellgrounds Oh god, of course not! Because the boots were made of a light denim and newspaper. Not layers and layers of Nylon, Dacron, Teflon-coated beta cloth, silicone rubber, Mylar, Chromel-R...
That rock is made out of paper! Why didn't they just jump 6 or more feet straight up if the gravity was so low? Why didn't he just pick that rock up and throw it like a baseball?
haha man they really went out of there way to to prove they went to the moon,
ya back then some people would see this as reall and ya there is still a few today (not to cleaver) people that still think they did haha funny though nice try NASA short on funding lets try and fool people and go to the MOON haha
@kevinjamesryan Couple things: One, why would NASA send a multi-million dollar rocket into space (launch visible from Orlando) with many witnesses, three astronauts, and do absolutely nothing for ten days straight? And also, lack of funding killed Apollos 18 and 19. Again, why would NASA spend millions of dollars on a rocket that did nothing. Look at facts, you goddam moron.
@PoweredByFlow Not as nuts as you might think. The lunar overshoes, worn over the suit proper, were not pressurized and had an outer shell of Chromal R, woven metal, and the toe and sole were of silicon rubber.
w w w*myspacemuseum*com/bootglove*htm
So even if he got a hole through all that, it still wouldn't pop the suit.
@yourmajezty Someone's got an ego, as indicated by their username. if bullshit is all you can say, and you can't explain why, you're a waste of space.
@Nostro200 Nowadays wasn't back then moron. This is 2011. That was 1972. Regardless, you have zero proof that was made of styrofoam. So until you can give a solid case, I'm inclined to stick to the evidence. Also, you've never bothered to explain the lunar samples that were brought back from the moon on Apollo 17. Not even all the lunar samples on earth could've accounted for those amounts. And styrofoam wouldn't work, because lab results conclusively showed them to be of lunar origin.
I thought only two astronauts were only on the moon surface at any one time, I always wondered who was the third guy operating the camera on the tripod, notice the jerky pans and tilts. Anyone got the answer to that?
@beasties movie 1957 the cameras were remotely controlled to capture the astronauts death should that happen. like say lunar radiation or a micrometeorite or a suit malfunction, suicide, homoerotic killing,aliens, i have fallen and i cant get up, and last but not least ................ drum roll............................... the blast off.
@beastiesmovie1957 The camera was on the Lunar Rover and it was automatically controlled by someone at Mission Control in Houston......if you want me to be real specific, I think it was the INCO controller.
"He is disappointed that, due to lunar gravity, the rock doesn't roll very far."
You ignorant! inertia has nothing to do with gravity. In fact, a ball on the Moon on a flat surface would roll further since there's a fifth as much friction against the surface (proportional to the ball's weight) and no air resistance to oppose its advance.
heathmoor 1 day ago
Hey why don't you add a Britney Spears soundtrack instead!
FantasticBob7000 1 month ago
With no atmosphere, and 11 times LESS gravity, why isn't the dirt being kicked up by his boots not "floating" like the flag did?
CONTROVERSYRISING 1 month ago
I used to kick rocks on the moon... then I took an arrow to the knee...
MrVudii 1 month ago
This was very stupid......even though there was almost no gravity, he could damage his clothes and therefore got killed due to the lick of oxigem....
Embraer091 1 month ago
rad. i wanna go to the moon and kick rocks. lol
TheEricrya 2 months ago
moon soccer
saulovyny 2 months ago
Make a hole is ur suit then lets see who will be kicking ;0
sirgrundel 2 months ago
Rock: U mad?
Omnicide 2 months ago
"Also heard speaking is the other astronaut Gene Cernan."
Ah, no. All we can hear is that rubbish pseudo-music you put over the video.
bored1980 3 months ago 32
Suddenly a hole appears
FUCK! FUCK! FUCK!
jvkstudios 3 months ago
If it were faked, why didn't they just use an inflatable rock, like at the ending of Rammstein's music video Amerika ( search for it on youtube ) you ask ? Because it would defeat the very PURPOSE of this faked event. They wanted to see just how powerful the media was, in its control of the public's mind --- even though it clearly is in Earth gravity, people believe it because Walter Kronkite says so. It was very similar to the "War of the World's" ---- a social experiment, really.
mooninquirer 3 months ago
@mooninquirer The moon landing was one big trial of the ASCH CONFORMITY EXPERIMENT ( search for that on youtube ). They wanted to test to what extent would the public not trust their own eyes, their own common sense, and there own judgment. Indeed, on the one year anniversary of the first moon landing, a poll revealed that 30 % of the public doubted it. But with the media and politicians constantly referring to it as a fact, that number went down to 11 % for the 30 th anniversary.
mooninquirer 3 months ago
@mooninquirer
Oh bullshit I was 20 when the first apollo landing occured NOBODY thought it was faked. It wasn't until Capricorn One that all the hoaxtards came out of the woodwork because they saw a Hollywood Movee and are like little kids . Same thing with The Philadelphia Experiment.
Blahblobify 3 months ago 13
@Blahblobify ya me to , whats with hollywood and there shit movies
onlythewise1 3 months ago
@mooninquirer your talking to your self, typical hoaxer
onlythewise1 3 months ago
@mooninquirer moon inquirer you are getting the wrong type answers from your inquireys because you are an utter douchbag,paranoid insecure little dweeb.go up to gene cernan and tell him he never went,he would kick your fat pimply ass
guitarnashelter 2 months ago
@guitarnashelter No, because it was a football player who asked one science teacher, and a president of the National Honor Society ( actually, that was more like being student council president at my school ), asked another science teacher, in high school ---- it was NOT just me. And in college, I had several professors saying on their own accord, without being prompted by any student's question, that the moon landing was a hoax, and one that should be laughed at.
mooninquirer 2 months ago
@guitarnashelter Gene Cernan has A LOT more money than I do, so I doubt that he would kick my ass, even as much as I would love to have that battery case. Also, Cernan did not attack Sibrel, so why would he attack me ? The MOST emotionally unstable of these Apollo astronauts is Buzz Aldrin.
mooninquirer 2 months ago
@mooninquirer well hes an old man who will die a hero,you are a nobody who will live in a caravan with only ur dog to give you a blow job,have a nice life
guitarnashelter 2 months ago
Looks EXACTLY like kicking a rock in Earth gravity, including the sand that was kicked up, which should have gone 6 times higher on the moon. That rock would weigh about three pounds on the moon, and would have done a lot more than that slight roll, with that powerful kicking motion.
mooninquirer 3 months ago
@mooninquirer How much did the rock weigh? How hard did he kick it? I don't see a 'powerful' kicking motion.
I think you might embellishing somewhat.
krisdevalle 3 months ago
@krisdevalle I would estimate that rock would weigh 3 pounds on the moon. I am NOT embellishing when I say that this looks EXACTLY like kicking such a rock on Earth --- they just slowed down the footage. There isn't even evidence of 1/2 gravity, let alone 1/6 gravity. Things should look much, much more like a zero gravity condition, than an Earth gravity condition. For example they should have EASILY banged out a set of 10 one armed pull ups on the rung of the ladder.
mooninquirer 3 months ago
@mooninquirer Why should it look like zero gravity? That is a lack of gravity.
1/6th gravity still means a gravitational acceleration constant of 1.6metres per second squared.
Schmidt even says 'roll' which means, obviously, he's not kicking the rock to get any air - he's pushing it along the ground, down a slope. And frankly, if this is set up and faked, then why wouldn't they just use a foam rock to make it look better?
I fear your analysis is based simply on your opinion only.
krisdevalle 3 months ago
@krisdevalle I didn't SAY that it would look like zero gravity, and you know it ! I said it should look MORE like zero gravity, than like Earth gravity. You are not being a sincere debater here ---- meaning you do not yourself believe man went to the moon. Are you a fan of David Duke ? Does the song by Saga ( search for it on youtube ) called "An Ode to a Dying People" have a special resonance for you ?
mooninquirer 3 months ago
Looks as genuine as all the other moon footage.
CNN911Fakes 3 months ago
QURAN 55:5 The sun and the moon[move] by precise calculation
35:13 He causes the night to enter the day, and? He causes the day to enter the night and has subjected the sun and the moon - each running [its course] for a specified term. That is Allah, your Lord; to Him belongs sovereignty. And those whom you invoke other than Him do not possess [as much as] the membrane of a date seed
25:61 Blessed is He who has placed in the sky great stars and placed therein a [burning]lamp and luminous moon
tamerakk 4 months ago
QURAN 14:33 And He subjected for you the sun and the moon,continuous[in orbit],and subjected for you the night and the day.
21:33 And it is He who created the night and the day and the sun and the moon;all [heavenly bodies] in an orbit are swimming.
36:38 And the sun? runs [on course] toward its stopping point. That is the determination of the Exalted in Might, the Knowing.
36:39 And the moon - We have determined for it phases, until it returns [appearing] like the old date stalk.
tamerakk 4 months ago
The whole time I was expecting something to jump out, because I watched Apollo 18. -.-
NelzTheDelz 4 months ago
who else wants to go to the moon just to f*ck with gravity?
buggyiscool 4 months ago
this is real u idiots why take pics and all ad take the dirt from it,why take things from a fake set if it wasnt real?this is real
virgo396 4 months ago
Mistake! If they had one little tear in that suit it would be GAME OVER would you chance it by kicking a rock ?
Allahsarmy 4 months ago
@theREALkaner I do not claim to be superior. I claim to have knowledge of physics and computer programming... facts that JetFreak refuses to believe. Call me garbage all you like... doesn't change the fact jetfreak is an arrogant little turd, who maintains that ANYONE who disagrees with him must be stupid. btw... I realise that I am nothing... no one will give a shit when I die, and don't I know it.
shanehoustein 4 months ago
philritter "BAAAA BAAAAA"
Me "What?"
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 i wish you were capable of grasping the irony. It hilarious.
philritter21 4 months ago
People listen the Moon landings are fake because of the facts of film visuals and the scenry of the fact there are no stars in the video's? Nothing at all.
Plus Hollywood Director came forth and admitted they made video for the public for a deal with the goverment unlimited use of military craft and future projects for movies.. deal done and made.
Dorisequador 4 months ago
Did they forget to wire the rock?
philritter21 4 months ago
As for the rock, what kind of braindead fuckwit would kick a boulder in a pressurized suit? On another world with no medics? real fuckin smart! NOT!! all it takes is 1 tear and you got 1 dead astronaut.
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 The astronaut is wearing thick, padded lunar overshoes over the normal spacesuit boots. The spacesuit has an integrated thermal micrometeoroid garment capable of withstanding tiny speeding impacts, and is about 13 layers, including mylar, non-woven dacron, etc.
This is the 6th mission to the moon with no spacesuit failures. The astronauts are confident that kicking a rock will not result in death.
Know the context and you will understand the situation.
krisdevalle 4 months ago
@krisdevalle Thanks for explaining that mate! i still wouldnt try it if i was up their though! They shouldve taken a golf set up their or a proper footy n kicked it to see how far it would go!
bjm351 4 months ago
It shows thins have very less Mass as compared to Land of Earth.
MajAamir 4 months ago
I love the way the cameras follow the astronauts especially when they leave the moon surface back to earth I wonder whom filmed that and was left behind to fly back alone did you guy' notice these things.
Dorisequador 4 months ago
@Dorisequador Hope you're joking bro....you know cameras can be automated right.
impaleddead 4 months ago
@Dorisequador `apparently` that camera was remote controlled by Houston lol!! Which says to me, that their should be PLENTY of footage from that camera if its still up their yeh? notice how the camera never shows them go all the way into space? it actually pans back down to the ground! and the camera on board conveniently stops filming at the same height that the ground camera starts to pan down. cables were only 90ft high i think. ALL MOON FOOTAGE IS FAKE. but some of the photos are real.......
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 remote controled in 1969? hmmmm I know we went around the moon and came back yes thats true landed? I think not. they launched a teliscope to show us the planets out there yes very nice but show us proof live that your landing existed and I want real footage. Not bullshit fake crap.
I do believe all moon footage is fake fake fucking fake. But I do believe we made it just not landed ..
If we did they have no real footage due to the cold of space breaking the film strips.
Dorisequador 4 months ago
@Dorisequador Yeh thats it, all moon footage is faked but you dont need to be Einstein to work that out!! What shits me is Google moon and the friggin Hubble cant even show us a crystal clear view of the landing spots. We see NO evidence of buggy tracks on moon or rover tracks on Mars. Now i know Mars has wild storms but apparently the moon doesnt, so all the footprints and tracks should be clearly visible. but they arent. You would think they would be proud to show off the landing site!!
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 Very very much agreed I think the wold would really like to see it.. They left eh car behind so it's there still. I wanna see it.
Dorisequador 4 months ago
@bjm351 Just this week NASA released pix of the landing sites, from 20km up, as the LRO passed in a temporarily lower orbit.
krisdevalle 4 months ago
@krisdevalle interesting! got a link or is it on their site? How come the Jap probe didnt see it that flew pretty low didint it? they shouldve crashed it somewhere near the Apollo spot so it could flyover low! but yeh keen to see these pics!!
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 IF you google for 'BBC LRO' you should get the news article about it.
The Kaguya probe did not have as big a camera. The LRO has two cameras, the NAC and WAC (Narrow and Wide Angle Cameras) and while the science payload is different 7 instruments, the camera instrument is only part of the setup, and as I recall weighs about 20kg. This is a lot different from Earth satellite cams that can weight up to 700kg. It's easier to get smaller things to the moon.
krisdevalle 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@krisdevalle Thanks bud will check it out now!
bjm351 4 months ago
@krisdevalle hmmmm so i looked at the photos, only the shadows dont match up!! for 1, the Apollo gear has the blackest of black shadows, while all the rest are pale, and the shadows being cast are from the wrong direction!! LEM is casting a shadow to the east, while everything else is casting a shadow to the west!! Dammit i knew id find something wrong with it!! Also theres not enough tracks for Apollo 17 for all the driving they did for 3 days!! I dunno! i just dont know!
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 How many other satellite images from the moon have you reviewed?
There is an entire staff of experts working at the Arizona State University, at the LROC web page, and they all have contact details. If you are having trouble understanding the images, then contact one of them.
If you seriously are thinking these are fakes and some one-eyed doofus retard has photoshopped the shadows the the wrong way, you are stupider than I thought.
krisdevalle 4 months ago
@krisdevalle well ill stick to bein stupid and you stick to being a loyal NASA sheep ok!! Guess its too much to have a conversation without bringing the other down for their views eh? The fact that it took the 40 yrs to release a pic doesnt help. btw ive looked at hundreds of sat photos i have a whole file on them. but anyway im done talking to you your just another that sooks when someone doesnt agree with you. i guess your not as intelligent as i thought! catchya. BTW i said i dunno. not PS.
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 Perhaps I was rash; but it is an affront to say that you think the shadows are going to the 'wrong way' when obviously, these pictures have been released worldwide, and made it to the BBC and other news outlets and nobody noticed - or even if they were faked, the fakers were so stupid as to make a mistake like that. Think about it.
Do you really think that if it was faked, and NASA wanted to show it was not faked, they would be so clumsy as to mess up these images?
krisdevalle 4 months ago
@bjm351 Honestly, what goes through your head when calling other people sheep? Do you not realize that the only people who are on the same boat as you are strange strange people who have nothing better to do than be internet warriors? What goes through your head when you watch videos of the Saturn V launches? Were those just for shits? When non government radars tracked the modules to the moon? What about the millions of experts who come to the opposite conclusion as your? Incredibly ignorant.
philritter21 4 months ago
Especially with todays tech, they should be able to easily show us and then it mite shut people like me up a lil bit, but they dont. And theyre arrogant enough to say `we dont need to`. Well yes NASA you fucking do because times running out before other countries expose your lies!! it really cant be hard for them to show us. And Obama saying that the US doesnt have the tech to go back WTF? worked 40 yrs ago why not now!! its all lies!!!
bjm351 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Especially with todays tech, they should be able to easily show us and then it mite shut people like me up a lil bit, but they dont. And theyre arrogant enough to say `we dont need to`. Well yes NASA you fucking do because times running out before other countries expose your lies!! it really cant be hard for them to show us. And Obama saying that the US doesnt have the tech to go back WTF? worked 40 yrs ago why not now!! its all lies!!!
bjm351 4 months ago
@Dorisequador Radio was invented in 1885, and remote control was first demonstrated in 1898. That's more than 70 years before this footage.
krisdevalle 4 months ago
@krisdevalle Everybody has and opinion and thats fine but do not tell me that the moon footage is real when you can see the way they move is a wired suport movement. Plus we do not move in slow motion in space? Or on the moon they did that for affect that made me believe it was all faked.
I've seen fottage of space it's clear and smooth framed not slow motion.
Second they would not fall stupidly or kick rocks due to puncher of the suit and fear.. or wow be careful we made it.
Dorisequador 4 months ago
@Dorisequador I don't see any wires.
Every astronaut was careful of movement in space; especially in a different gravity environment.
The suits were very tough. What do you think they were made of? I was interested, so I went and found out.
krisdevalle 4 months ago
@Dorisequador The moon footage looks real to everyone who isnt a strange messed up person who feels the desperate need to fit in with a group so they cling on to these weird ideas. Ever notice that you are in the same group as the 9/11 conspiracy guys? The UFO weirdos? The Flat Earthers? The chemtrail nuts? The Japanese earthquake nuclear false flag conspiracy theorists? See a pattern here? DO YOU? YOU ARE PART of that group that the rest of us laugh at for not using a shred of critical thinking
philritter21 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Dorisequador The moon footage looks real to everyone who isnt a strange messed up person who feels the desperate need to fit in with a group so they cling on to these weird ideas. Ever notice that you are in the same group as the 9/11 conspiracy guys? The UFO weirdos? The Flat Earthers? The chemtrail nuts? The Japanese earthquake nuclear false flag conspiracy theorists? See a pattern here? DO YOU? YOU ARE PART of that group that the rest of us laugh at for not using a shred of critical thinking
philritter21 4 months ago
@Dorisequador The moon footage looks real to everyone who isnt a strange messed up person who feels the desperate need to fit in with a group so they cling on to these weird ideas. Ever notice that you are in the same group as the 9/11 conspiracy guys? The UFO weirdos? The Flat Earthers? The chemtrail nuts? The Japanese earthquake nuclear false flag conspiracy theorist? See a pattern here? DO YOU? YOU ARE PART of that group that the rest of us laugh at for not using a shred of critical thinking
philritter21 4 months ago
@philritter21 I love retards like you your so dumb a retard say's you fucking stupid.
9/11 wow building 7 just fell no planes no nothing down the street? Really brighty explain that one seriously?
No because you a complete fuck up gay fuck.
I never said the 2 builing were not hit by planes and came down because of the planes?
They actually did come down because of the planes running threw them.
Moon Landings well prove a nice videos of the stars at night like a see from earth ?
Nothing.
Dorisequador 4 months ago
@Dorisequador Thank you for proving my point exactly. And I love it when people try to call others stupid, when they themselves can barely cobble together a proper sentence with correct spelling. Yeah, nice going buddy. You are exactly what we've come to expect from this group. Goodbye.
philritter21 4 months ago
@philritter21 Well who's gonna answer you at night a scientist or doctor or a Lawyer? No a Drunk couch potato like me hahaha Cannot make a proper sentence.. well if you can read I made my point.
I called you a Retard because you are one. If I actually found you to be a person who deserves respect you would have gotten respect.
I know these video's 100% are fake. Stop telling people your so intelligent and great and they are real?/ When they are not at all.
Dorisequador 4 months ago
@Dorisequador remote control cameras :P
kirza94 4 months ago
@kirza94 hahah oh ya in a studio i guess hehehe
Dorisequador 4 months ago
@Dorisequador havent you seen the recent satellite that went to the moon a few days ago? it took the first pictures of the landing sites again, totally gets rid of the moon hoax idea
kirza94 4 months ago
@kirza94 fake pictures.. show me the sight and where they are clear? Not fake ..
Dorisequador 4 months ago
@Dorisequador you're not gunna stop till you're actually standing right next to the LM are you? you're that stubborn ( /watch?v=PTeM4ZqEKR4&feature=channel_video_title )
kirza94 4 months ago
@Dorisequador Idiot, it's an motored camera. THINK about posting stupid things about conspiracies.
toocoolforu 4 months ago
@toocoolforu Your beyond retarded you know that don't you.. I feel bad for you your that stupid ..I really do.
Dorisequador 4 months ago
@Dorisequador What are you then ? Oh so you think every engineers who work for NASA and space agencies (aka the best engineers on earth) are stupid, or part of a big lie ? Wow really... You dare insult me. As I said, get help!
toocoolforu 4 months ago
@toocoolforu Engineers that worked on the original spce program did a decent job but today they sell the public a lie. The past video's were all faked and everyone went along with it that mattered they sold it to their staff. Get a buge pay check and shut up and keep your job and have a meal on the table. The others just believed the lie.. like everybody else. They made it they landed but the video's are fakes.
At that time people wanted a show so they gave it to them.
Think moron.
Dorisequador 4 months ago
@Dorisequador If you can't make it...fake it! lol...We were not that smart back then...heck, they didn't even realize to start equal rights until ten years "after" the fact (Which should have been way sooner!). This was the same generation that said it was healthy to stuff yourself full of food, cigarettes are okay and cool, water makes you weak, and what are lead toys etc.? They didn't know crap! lol Likewise, we still don't know much! lol
stephen2152002 4 months ago
@stephen2152002 I agree man I talked to people of age back then who worked on such similare things they had no way of doing what they said in that time.. Their tech back then just wasn't up to par They went into space then came back.. that's it.. Years later Possibly but the radiation is emence. I wonder who would survive that?
Radiation outside our planets invisable sheild which goes out into space about 3 times the size of the earth which we do not understand how the planet has this.
Dorisequador 4 months ago
Right, cuz kicking rocks is something NASA would want an astronaut to do in space. How safe is running around, falling on hard moon rocks, getting in/out of the buggy and driving like a lunatic up and down valleys? ONLY TARDS honestly believe we went there with that tard ass tech.
shermanr6 5 months ago
@shermanr6 Pretty safe. The integrated thermal micrometeoroid garment that goes over the top of the spacesuit had the top couple of layers consisting of rip-proof woven mylar, designed to resist the impact of tiny micrometeoroids traveling thousands of miles per hour.
You don't think NASA would so stupid as to design a flimsy, easily ripped spacesuit, do you?
Do you really think that's a thing they would overlook?
krisdevalle 5 months ago
@krisdevalle Not safe at all. U flip the rover over and lights out Mr. Prof debunker.
shermanr6 5 months ago
@shermanr6 Flip the rover over? You realise it had a low centre of gravity and a top speed of 8mph.
Now you are just talking shit. Quit while you are ahead.
krisdevalle 5 months ago
@krisdevalle You know, with limited gravity n all, u hit one of those moon rocks and the next thing u know ur ass has escaped the moons graviational field. No but seriously, 8 mph over rocks, hills, valleys and an ALIEN surface to me, is TOO dangerous, especially if im a NASA scientist. WE DIDNT GO, America is the land of the fake and home of bullshit!
shermanr6 5 months ago
@shermanr6 Boy, you really displayed your deep ignorance there.
The escape velocity of the moon is 2.38 kilometres PER SECOND.
I told you to quit while you were ahead but you had come back and say even stupider shit. You're not a NASA scientist. You think they'd design a rover that was unsafe, or incapable of dealing with the lunar surface? What the fuck is wrong with you - just because you think it's dangerous, that suddenly makes it a fake? Those guys have bigger balls than you, obviously.
krisdevalle 5 months ago
@krisdevalle EASY TO HAVE BIG BALLS IN A MOVIE!
shermanr6 5 months ago
Thats not a rock...tell me how does hulk do it? How do spiderman has such power?
Its faked
Nostro200 5 months ago
the rock would move lots more if this was in low gravity, NOT THE OTHER WAY ROUND!!!
kernzyp 5 months ago
@kernzyp This rock wouldn't move at all if it was on Earth. Unless you can give me exact measurements on how big the rock was, how much it weighed, etc., there is no way to calculate how much it should've moved.
jetfreak4 5 months ago
@kernzyp not if you kicked it down a hill no gravity to propel it
bmxseanbmx 4 months ago
@kernzyp Think about how big that bouder is and the fact he's kicking it around like that at all...imagine how heavy it would be on Earth.
Klartank 4 months ago
@Klartank Imagine how hollow and plastic it was kicked around in the sound stage in Nevada. Wait, Im sorry...saying it was kicked around in Nevada is jumping to conclusions...definitely a sound stage on earth, so same weight though ;)
stephen2152002 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Buzz Aldrin never went to the moon. The evidence shows that they faked the moon landings. Here's a link to some of it.
3W's (dot) brainsturbator (dot) com/forums/viewthread/1335/
(check link for gaps)
Cosmicmoron 5 months ago
@blahbloblfy. Unfortunate that you see and hear what the GOV wants you to believe, like the moon landing. Great comeback though.
akaredcrossbow 5 months ago
@akaredcrossbow When you actually have hard evidence the moon landing was faked, maybe people will listen to you. Until then, you're going to have to disprove scientists who don't work for the government as well as those that do. You likely believe 9/11 was the work of President Bush, that Pearl Harbor was the work of FDR, etc. People like you fit into a category I like to call FUCKTARDED.
jetfreak4 5 months ago
@jetfreak4
People like you fit in to a caregory I like to call state brainwashed idiots owned by the state.
kennjohnsen 5 months ago
@kennjohnsen People like you fit into a state called "losers" who haven't done their research and simply refuse to believe anything, regardless of what supporting evidence there is, largely due to some agenda they have to attack others to feel better about themselves. Nobody tells us to see or believe anything...we have the ability to think and function as individuals. You fall into a small percentage of people who don't think we went to the moon. This is the US, not Nazi Germany.
jetfreak4 5 months ago
@jetfreak4
You are the loser, and don't function and think as an individual, but as the compact majority.
kennjohnsen 5 months ago
@kennjohnsen I think as an individual. I just clearly don't share your fucked up views.
jetfreak4 5 months ago
@jetfreak4 Why don't you go find some videos of a dune buggy or a sand rover at the beach, dry beach sand then get back to me K. The sand kicks off the tires and falls the same way. The only difference is that it's during the day and they haven't slowed the videos down. Looks like you are right somebody has never been to the beach. LOL
akaredcrossbow 5 months ago
@akaredcrossbow
No it doesn't, like most moonfuck hoaxtards, you are seeing what you want to see and just make shit up.
Blahblobify 5 months ago
@Blahblobify
Like you Moonfuck Moon hoaxsters, you are seeing what you are told to see, and believe what you are told to believe.
kennjohnsen 5 months ago
@kennjohnsen
great now explain 800+ lbs of moon rocks brought back.
Blahblobify 5 months ago
@Blahblobify
What do you know about 800 pounds of rocks, have you seen it, have you seen a picture of the 800 pound ?
kennjohnsen 5 months ago
@kennjohnsen
Oh Fuck You by your logic we can't prove that Charles Lindbergh flew across the Atlantic or even that World War two happened.
Grow up queer.
Blahblobify 5 months ago
@Blahblobify
Flying across the atlantic is not an impossibility, but a motherfucker like you deny that.
kennjohnsen 5 months ago
@akaredcrossbow Yeah, I guess it's you.
jetfreak4 5 months ago
Beach sand on earth looks the same as this when it is kicked around. It falls the same way. FAIL
akaredcrossbow 5 months ago
@akaredcrossbow Somebody's obviously never been to the beach. Beach sand doesn't travel in the concentrated amounts shown in this video.
jetfreak4 5 months ago
im not saying when we didn't land on the moon but this video is fake.
pwned953 5 months ago
thats no rock.. its a moon turtle.. yah couldn't see, but it bit him on the boot .^_^. astronaut thoughts before kick'n it... *stupid moon turtle!! try'n to bite my foot huh? i'll give u something to bite..*..sec's later. KICK! KICK!.. ect.. lol
2toedoe2 6 months ago 13
thats no rock.. its a moon turtle.. yah could see, but it bit him on the boot .^_^. astronaut thoughts before kick'n it... *stupid moon turtle!! try'n to bite my foot huh? i'll give u something to bite..*..sec's later. KICK! KICK!.. ect.. lol
2toedoe2 6 months ago
Looks like your dad trying to join in a football match ha
dylanlawless1 6 months ago
chatroom
Nostro200 6 months ago
I felt bad for the rock
nitroxide2011 6 months ago
@fauxnim Like you can read and know everything about me. Watergate and Guatemala are two incidents. There is solid proof that we went to the moon. Recent images taken by satellites show the equipment of several Apollo missions. And unlike these two cases, the U.S. never made these things public while they were occuring. How can two cases therefore be explanations for the rest of the times? And why would the U.S. fake the same thing 6 times? To make it convincing, right? Idiot.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@shanehoustein Further more the hijackers would have been at the front of the plane, the fireball would not happen untill the fuel tanks in the wings ruptured and ignited a long way behind the cockpit by which time the debris from the front half of the plane travelling at 100's MPH would have exited the other side of the building, hows your physics lessons going? ;)
musicbruv 6 months ago
@musicbruv this lesson is great, thanks :) I appreciate people taking the time to write comments without getting abusive. I still find it very difficult to believe that it would have survived the fireball and somehow ended up intact on top of the rubble.
shanehoustein 6 months ago
@shanehoustein If you look at footage of the twin towers after the attack you will see all sorts of paper fluttering about in the air, a passport would be heavier but still float slowly to the ground possibly well away from the towers, personaly I think it is very plausable that the passport could just be laying around somewhere.
musicbruv 6 months ago
@shanehoustein You were asking for it, and quite frankly, he's being no more abusive than me. Either way, you've been served. Eat what's on your plate and maybe you'll get smart.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@jetfreak4 yeah... because my job programming computers doesn't require any smarts, right? What about the pods attached to the planes; the fact that Osama wrote with his right hand in the confession video (even tho he was left handed); the way building 7 fell; the fact that Bush and his cabinet wouldn't testify under oath; THE Israelis that went on TV to say they were there to document the event (and therefore had prior knowledge)? The list goes on and on.
shanehoustein 6 months ago
@shanehoustein I seriously doubt you program computers. The so-called pods are either the engines of the plane or they were filmed with poor quality footage that is impossible to definitively make out. High quality footage which I remember seeing on the day of 9-11 showed no pods, just planes. There would have been proof of a missile in the debris. Building 7 collapsing is once again backed up by physics. Muslim tradition is one reason why Bin Laden used his right hand, or the FBI got it wrong
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@jetfreak4 you seriously doubt I program computers? lmao! goes to show how assuming and arogant you are. Building 7... is also backed up by a controlled demolition expert saying it is definitely a controlled demolition. And Bin Laden writing with his right hand - it is a well known fact that he was left handed. If you choose to believe that the FBI got it wrong, or that somehow he was able to force himself to right with his right hand... go ahead... but that is not a "reasonable" explanation.
shanehoustein 6 months ago
@shanehoustein Building 7 is also attested to have fallen down as the government said it did by many other controlled demolition experts. And why shouldn't I doubt you program computers? You claim to have studied physics yet clearly have no knowledge or understanding of it. It is easily plausible the FBI could have made a mistake. The U.S. government deliberately killing 3,000 citizens at random is not. Have a nice life, Truther. If you reply back, don't expect me to this time.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@jetfreak4 I was using physics just the other day... when I was programming a game using the Box2D physics engine. You are an arrogant, stuck-up, wanker of epic proportions. Better buy yourself a life time supply of tissues mate, because with your attitude you ain't ever getting laid... unless you pay for it... but I guess you'll have enough money because you're so damn smart, right!
shanehoustein 6 months ago
@shanehoustein Don't even claim to know anytihng about my sexual life when you know nothing about physics.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
All of the so-called lists you present have reasonable explanations. You choose to go with the outrageous ones. Now..this is done. I'll hand the rest off to musicbruv.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the moon is made from cheese................
SuperBandstand 6 months ago
@fauxnim This is a waste of my time and energy arguing with a conspiracist. Do us all a favor and beat the crap out of yourself instead of starting fights on the internet. Or better yet, face the people you have a problem with in person. I'm guessing you're too much of a coward to do that. Either way, not my problem. Have a nice life.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@fauxnim Stop talking in rhymes. I bet you think 9-11 was an inside job too. The only person lying to me that I can see is you.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@jetfreak4 911 was an inside job. Proof: the official story says that one hijacker was identified by his passport, which was ejected from the fireball when the plane struck the tower and fell to the street below where it was found by the FBI. Absolutely impossible! But if you want to believe it, go ahead.
shanehoustein 6 months ago
@shanehoustein Explain how it's impossible, and maybe I'll believe you. You have no explanation for how it's impossible, so until you do, I choose to stick with the official story. Better yet, until you convince the majority of Americans it was an inside job, or explain why our own government would plunge our country into economic crisis, kill 3,000 of our own people, nearly bankrupt our own airline industry....etc. Makes even less sense than the FBI finding the terrorist's passport.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@jetfreak4 for starters, the rubble would have come down on top of the passport... unless the passport managed to flutter around in the air like a magic little fairy for an hour before coming to rest on top of the debris. Secondly, none of the hijackers names appeared on any passenger list, so how could the FBI assume, even for a second that the passport originated from the plane? I didn't say the government had anything to do with it. "inside" means people on the inside, not the whole govt.
shanehoustein 6 months ago
@shanehoustein You're obviously lacking both in factual knowledge of 9-11, and in knowledge of the laws of physics. I don't waste my time on truthers normally, and I'm just reminded again of why I don't.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@jetfreak4 I studied physics at university. I have read the 9-11 commission report. Explain to me how exactly I lack knowledge.
shanehoustein 6 months ago
@shanehoustein You lack knowledge because anyone with knowledge of physics knows explosions are unpredictable. You'd be surprised what survived the 9-11 explosions. Jewelry, personal items, the landing gear, which was flung several miles from the towers, etc. Something as light as a passport could easily have been flung far enough away not to be covered in rubble. And it wasn't found by the FBI, but by a passerby, and not quickly either as many like you believe.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@shanehoustein Excuse me, the report says several blocks. Regardless, the report also acknowledges the presence of debris where the passport was found. Also, the alleged passenger lists were not passenger manifests: they were victims lists. And unless you believe the terrorists were victims, there is no reason why they'd appear on the lists. that's my two cents: if you don't like it, good luck selling your theory to the masses.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@shanehoustein Correct... well done the passsport would have taken a long time to hit the ground proberly a long way away, look at the smoke from the fires and you will see the wind was very strong, if you know anything about physics then you should know that heavy objects fall fast and light ones fall slower and are influenced by the atmosphere conditions. did you skip that lesson?
musicbruv 6 months ago
@fauxnim Either say something you can back up or don't say anything at all. There is zero proof this was faked.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
this is a fake moon landing, there on sand in london studio
charlie000111 7 months ago
@charlie000111 And the proof for your claim is what?
CHSarahBs 6 months ago
and meanwhile.. he came back to earth and try the same thing to the rock.. .. .........
jasonyeozhishen 7 months ago
Then Zod, Ursa, and Non showed up and shit really got bad
JustDoWhatITellYou 7 months ago
i may be thick as two short planks, but how does loose rocks sit on the moon?...hopefully some genius will answer that for me!!....lunar gravity...lol as it tells me
BOXINGFANFAN 7 months ago
@BOXINGFANFAN
you may be as think as two short planks if that was a real question? if not im sorry if i offend.
Ashmansworth 7 months ago
@BOXINGFANFAN haha, the moon has gravity, just not as strong as the earths
casboultone 7 months ago
i may be thick as two short planks, but how does loose rocks sit on the moon?...hopefully some genius will answer that for me!!
BOXINGFANFAN 7 months ago
he could've accidentally rip his suit !you know the rest
94petrutz 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is a pretty good video, but it's not as good as the one where the guy gets hit in the crotch with a baseball. Have you seen that one?
dmh497 7 months ago
if you think for your self ..you will realise the potential danger (a tear in their suit)
YOU JUST JUST WOULD'NT BE KICKING just ask yourself ... would you ?
spellgrounds 7 months ago
@spellgrounds Oh god, of course not! Because the boots were made of a light denim and newspaper. Not layers and layers of Nylon, Dacron, Teflon-coated beta cloth, silicone rubber, Mylar, Chromel-R...
joeloud1 7 months ago
That rock is made out of paper! Why didn't they just jump 6 or more feet straight up if the gravity was so low? Why didn't he just pick that rock up and throw it like a baseball?
john17972 8 months ago
@john17972 Two words. Limited mobility. They can hardly move in those suits.
OiTabemashou 7 months ago
haha man they really went out of there way to to prove they went to the moon,
ya back then some people would see this as reall and ya there is still a few today (not to cleaver) people that still think they did haha funny though nice try NASA short on funding lets try and fool people and go to the MOON haha
kevinjamesryan 8 months ago
@kevinjamesryan Couple things: One, why would NASA send a multi-million dollar rocket into space (launch visible from Orlando) with many witnesses, three astronauts, and do absolutely nothing for ten days straight? And also, lack of funding killed Apollos 18 and 19. Again, why would NASA spend millions of dollars on a rocket that did nothing. Look at facts, you goddam moron.
JRsaturn5 8 months ago
whys he kicking rock?
MadCatsx 8 months ago
Antihydrogen Laser PHysics Apparatus
watch?v=GoSaHiCduDc
amiasix 8 months ago
Looks like a kid that plays on the moon. But this guy is really nuts. What if his suit get damaged...
PoweredByFlow 8 months ago
@PoweredByFlow Not as nuts as you might think. The lunar overshoes, worn over the suit proper, were not pressurized and had an outer shell of Chromal R, woven metal, and the toe and sole were of silicon rubber.
w w w*myspacemuseum*com/bootglove*htm
So even if he got a hole through all that, it still wouldn't pop the suit.
loperspest 8 months ago
seems like a really risky thing to do.
pvvned 8 months ago
It would be impossible to move this rock on earth with your foot alone.
jetfreak4 8 months ago 9
@jetfreak4 bullshit
yourmajezty 6 months ago
@yourmajezty Someone's got an ego, as indicated by their username. if bullshit is all you can say, and you can't explain why, you're a waste of space.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@jetfreak4
Styrofoam !!! you asshole!
Nostro200 6 months ago
@Nostro200 Boy you're dumb. That doesn't even resemble styrofoam to the slightest degree in appearance.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@jetfreak4
You have no freaking Idea what man can do nowdays...
Nostro200 6 months ago
@Nostro200 Nowadays wasn't back then moron. This is 2011. That was 1972. Regardless, you have zero proof that was made of styrofoam. So until you can give a solid case, I'm inclined to stick to the evidence. Also, you've never bothered to explain the lunar samples that were brought back from the moon on Apollo 17. Not even all the lunar samples on earth could've accounted for those amounts. And styrofoam wouldn't work, because lab results conclusively showed them to be of lunar origin.
jetfreak4 6 months ago
@jetfreak4
Can do many things...except go to the moon.
Nostro200 6 months ago
@jetfreak4 it looks funny on the moon tough
1Nekit1 5 months ago
I thought only two astronauts were only on the moon surface at any one time, I always wondered who was the third guy operating the camera on the tripod, notice the jerky pans and tilts. Anyone got the answer to that?
beastiesmovie1957 9 months ago
@beasties movie 1957 the cameras were remotely controlled to capture the astronauts death should that happen. like say lunar radiation or a micrometeorite or a suit malfunction, suicide, homoerotic killing,aliens, i have fallen and i cant get up, and last but not least ................ drum roll............................... the blast off.
datzfast 9 months ago
@datzfast and the numer one cause of space fatalities is dead batteries.
datzfast 9 months ago
@beastiesmovie1957 The camera was on the Lunar Rover and it was automatically controlled by someone at Mission Control in Houston......if you want me to be real specific, I think it was the INCO controller.
dave46563 9 months ago