if you want to teach people something in these videos then the last thing you should do ( that you always do do) is patronize them. all of your infomation is an interpretation and no origional ideas. tasteless, classless trash. learn some fucking manners
you understanding of art is not very deep. In fact you really should not be making such a authoritative stance. Artist are a bit more complex and possibly intellectual than maybe your aesthetic valuing potential. Kandinsky "throwing paint on a canvas" When you can comprehend the term metaphysical then you will see Kandinsky for the first time. True there are a lot of crap art out there but you couldn't tell the difference
Creation through destruction anyone?. Let's all agree these "artistic notions" of which you speak of were destroyed around the turn of the 20th century. Modernism, on the whole, was a rejection against the ruling elite and were born in an effort to combat communism/fascism. Oh no wait, maybe your role playing like Stephen Colbert or something. Ah, now that makes since. Creativity my friend
The dog ribs is on the scent of the cropper.The smell is adhominem attacks,slippery slopes,hasty generalizations,post hoc fallacies,faulty comparisons,denying the antecedent,and general philosophical disasters. Stay tuned.
So according to you,we should all adhere to your taste?Dismiss thousands of painters and poets because cropper says we should have his aesthetics?Once it ceases to be grounded in reality it ceases to be art.Are you kidding?Why can't the imagination outlean reality in science fiction and dystopian fiction?Picasso's Guernica is a direct assault against fascism.The dadaists nihilism was directed against world war.I'm going to expose you're ignorance and make you my summer project.
Peevish,bourgeoise,ill-informed.Pollock stole techniques from Native American sand paintings and ancient oriental masters.Art is about exectuting techniques,not wallowing in bourgeoise taste battles between classical and modern temperaments.
You,change the world?You can't even put together one engaging idea.Picasso mastered classicism by the time he was fourteen and was painting at the level of Rembrandt during that time.Kandinsky never smeared a canvas in his life.Mondrian(like Euclid)shows the absolute quality of the line.Since when are the geometric shapes of Kandinsky or Mondrian not intelligible?Emotions come from many things,including the impulses of the brain.I'd suggest you get one.
It's obvious and frightening that you take yourself seriously. You are oversaturated and have lost touch with the infinite points of connection necessary to discuss anything with wisdom. Wisdom and intelligence are vastly different. You unfortunately lack the former and have a tremendously diseased latter. Please don't post any more of this merde. Are you trying to change the world? I think not. The humble basement professor with his natural light. So unpretentious as to be pretentious. RRRetch.
Modern Art is a Heist. The Tate Modern has a whole floor dedicated to a gift shop, complete with sponsors and another floor dedicated to an expensive cafeteria. The last thing they bought was a hat-stand with the pegs pulled off. They place this 'art' alongside great abstract works e.g Salvadore Dali in order to give it a 'kinship' and allow reflected glory. If you did not have the hat-stand next to the Dali, if the hat-stand was just in somebody's house, it would not be MISTAKEN as art EVER.
its like a very very very boring lecture.. but i suppose it makes sense..
i went to a modern art gallery in my local town, which cost £19million. It was a load of crap. That money could have been better spent elsewhere in my opinion.
Hanging a piece of string from one side of the wall to the other is NOT art. I'm sorry, but modern art is pathetic.
Do you have a thought that isnt from an objectivist book...it is like a religion with you... your think you can explain everything from Rands work... its like your bible... LET IT GO... SO... what "old" art is then a visualisation of reality?
And please... the avantgarde (exept for the italian futurism) was against fascism... find me a contempurary art book that agrees with you!!!
Once and for all; Either...O.R.-Understand? Objective...non-Objective. Yes, for everything. Now, no more wasting valuable mAynd Aynergy spitting across the gRand schism. I've got a Civil-I-nation to build.
Now, in anticipation of the bromide response to 'either..O.R.'-I'll add that, no I wouldn't put all the non-objectives into concentration camps-the common knee'jerk' response. Its just a case of principle/subordinate. I would subordinate the non-Objective from mI own perspective, then I can move on.
if you want to teach people something in these videos then the last thing you should do ( that you always do do) is patronize them. all of your infomation is an interpretation and no origional ideas. tasteless, classless trash. learn some fucking manners
commarx 1 year ago
Modern art can be a load of horse shit.-- No, seriously. It can!
yammyspeed13 2 years ago
you understanding of art is not very deep. In fact you really should not be making such a authoritative stance. Artist are a bit more complex and possibly intellectual than maybe your aesthetic valuing potential. Kandinsky "throwing paint on a canvas" When you can comprehend the term metaphysical then you will see Kandinsky for the first time. True there are a lot of crap art out there but you couldn't tell the difference
vanbrooks 2 years ago
Creation through destruction anyone?. Let's all agree these "artistic notions" of which you speak of were destroyed around the turn of the 20th century. Modernism, on the whole, was a rejection against the ruling elite and were born in an effort to combat communism/fascism. Oh no wait, maybe your role playing like Stephen Colbert or something. Ah, now that makes since. Creativity my friend
slaytonj5 2 years ago
are you drinking a NATTY ICE? brewdogs???
utah2 3 years ago
Dadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadada
TheDogRibs 3 years ago
Hitler was an artist...only if somone would have said he was a good painter.
Windomjeff 3 years ago
you are the same blessing that some shit pieces of art "sad but real" and we should all thank you for reminding us of the state of our mental health
martinsamuelian 3 years ago
Instead, maybe we should all just rub the cropper's head for luck.
TheDogRibs 3 years ago
The dog ribs is on the scent of the cropper.The smell is adhominem attacks,slippery slopes,hasty generalizations,post hoc fallacies,faulty comparisons,denying the antecedent,and general philosophical disasters. Stay tuned.
TheDogRibs 3 years ago
So according to you,we should all adhere to your taste?Dismiss thousands of painters and poets because cropper says we should have his aesthetics?Once it ceases to be grounded in reality it ceases to be art.Are you kidding?Why can't the imagination outlean reality in science fiction and dystopian fiction?Picasso's Guernica is a direct assault against fascism.The dadaists nihilism was directed against world war.I'm going to expose you're ignorance and make you my summer project.
courtabeth 3 years ago
Peevish,bourgeoise,ill-informed.Pollock stole techniques from Native American sand paintings and ancient oriental masters.Art is about exectuting techniques,not wallowing in bourgeoise taste battles between classical and modern temperaments.
courtabeth 3 years ago
Dadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadadada
courtabeth 3 years ago
You,change the world?You can't even put together one engaging idea.Picasso mastered classicism by the time he was fourteen and was painting at the level of Rembrandt during that time.Kandinsky never smeared a canvas in his life.Mondrian(like Euclid)shows the absolute quality of the line.Since when are the geometric shapes of Kandinsky or Mondrian not intelligible?Emotions come from many things,including the impulses of the brain.I'd suggest you get one.
courtabeth 3 years ago
It's obvious and frightening that you take yourself seriously. You are oversaturated and have lost touch with the infinite points of connection necessary to discuss anything with wisdom. Wisdom and intelligence are vastly different. You unfortunately lack the former and have a tremendously diseased latter. Please don't post any more of this merde. Are you trying to change the world? I think not. The humble basement professor with his natural light. So unpretentious as to be pretentious. RRRetch.
PlatypusRyan 4 years ago
"Are you trying to change the world? I think not."
Yes, sir, I am.
MrCropper 4 years ago 5
i agree with your disagreement but teling him to fuck of we detroy our own perspective.
let that for the natzis.
martinsamuelian 3 years ago
Also modernism was the high peak of human culture
after wwII with Postmodernism dominating us
its all crap
itsdamovement 4 years ago
Hitler was man of strong will with wrong ideas
itsdamovement 4 years ago
Modern Art is a Heist. The Tate Modern has a whole floor dedicated to a gift shop, complete with sponsors and another floor dedicated to an expensive cafeteria. The last thing they bought was a hat-stand with the pegs pulled off. They place this 'art' alongside great abstract works e.g Salvadore Dali in order to give it a 'kinship' and allow reflected glory. If you did not have the hat-stand next to the Dali, if the hat-stand was just in somebody's house, it would not be MISTAKEN as art EVER.
orinocojones 4 years ago 2
This boy sure is lost in dull thought...his head is like a Nazi stone block. The 'object' of art that is to liberate your personal subjectivity.
elpaparico 4 years ago
its like a very very very boring lecture.. but i suppose it makes sense..
i went to a modern art gallery in my local town, which cost £19million. It was a load of crap. That money could have been better spent elsewhere in my opinion.
Hanging a piece of string from one side of the wall to the other is NOT art. I'm sorry, but modern art is pathetic.
ChrisTheRockGod 5 years ago
I recommend "the story of art" by EH Gombrich
TakeAleft 5 years ago 2
Do you have a thought that isnt from an objectivist book...it is like a religion with you... your think you can explain everything from Rands work... its like your bible... LET IT GO... SO... what "old" art is then a visualisation of reality?
And please... the avantgarde (exept for the italian futurism) was against fascism... find me a contempurary art book that agrees with you!!!
TakeAleft 5 years ago
Once and for all; Either...O.R.-Understand? Objective...non-Objective. Yes, for everything. Now, no more wasting valuable mAynd Aynergy spitting across the gRand schism. I've got a Civil-I-nation to build.
AynRandMotor 5 years ago
Now, in anticipation of the bromide response to 'either..O.R.'-I'll add that, no I wouldn't put all the non-objectives into concentration camps-the common knee'jerk' response. Its just a case of principle/subordinate. I would subordinate the non-Objective from mI own perspective, then I can move on.
AynRandMotor 5 years ago